"god the jews"

rainbow stew

Noahide News

Part 15

mason seal

Extra Extra

read all about it !

are they serious, these gods? You better betcha

 
The Death Of Americanism
And Therefore Our Constitution,
And Our Nation, Known As America

By Ed44
All Rights, Privileges, and Immunities Of Copyright Reserved
Informed.org
6-11-4
 
 
The 'process' began with the Nixon Whitehouse and the Asst. Attorneys, in the Attorney Generals Office, under that Administration. One of these, by the name of Rehnquist, was 'rewarded' for his participation, with a job in our United States Supreme Courthouse. It was then that the Department of Justice was ordered, and eagerly complied, with a request very similar to that which John Ashcroft acted in Contempt of Congress to conceal. The objective was to place Nixon, and all others in the Executive Branch of Government, 'Above the Law', with an argument of 'Official Immunity'.
 
For the past 35 years 'America' has been systematically, quietly, 'redefined'. They did not succeed but some of the same people involved in this were then given positions where they could implement this as 'Law' through dicta from our judicial Branch. The 'redefinition' abolished our most important Constitutional protection. The 'Prohibition of Titles of Nobility', established in Article I, sections 9 & 10. The 'immunity' doctrine grants 'Nobility status to ALL who are employed, and collectively make up, our government(s).
 
The most recent excuse for this 'redefinition' came on September 11, 2001. People have short memories but I remember, with horror, the frequent reference to 'America Redefined'. One network even adopted this as the Title of their News Program for the year following. The result is an Administration, and government, that acts with impunity. 'They' are not 'under Law'. They, in their minds, ARE 'the law'.
 
Few Americans today know the definition of America. It is found in our Constitution but ONLY if one realizes our Constitution was established to 'Secure the Blessings of Liberty' that blood was shed to secure. The definition of 'Liberty', and therefore what became the United States of America, is what I call 'Americanism' or, in other words, the definition of America as a Nation of People. It is the common characteristic that defines us as a Nation. It is what established our Government as a Government under the Rule of Law and clearly makes a distinction between our Government and our Nation. They are NOT one-in-the-same. Becoming aware of this distinction there is, then, no doubt that the Government under our current administration is a ROGUE government.
 
The definition of Americanism, and America as a Nation of People known as the United States, or by the nick names of 'Americans' in the Land known as America, is found in our Declaration of Law more commonly known as the Unanimous Declaration of Independence of the United States of America;
 
We hold these Truths to be self-evident (meaning they must be taken as Fact in this Land)
 
1 - All men (Human Beings) are created equal. (this includes ALL of humanity, along with those who live, or may be found, in Iraq or Afghanistan)
 
2 - Endowed (entitled) by their Creator, to certain inalienable (inherent) Rights, (Human Rights as well as the Civil found in Constitutions and International Law)
 
3 - That among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness ('among these' means 'not limited to'. Purpose of Government and Law is to find, and make more 'certain' other Rights of the Individual Human Being)
 
4 - TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men by consent of the governed.
 
NOTE: Number 4 is what separates 'We the People' from our Government and makes our Government Accountable to our Constitution by which LIMITED powers are delegated. A Government that is NOT 'the Law' but 'subject to' the Law.
 
It is now called the 'Age of Terrorism', as a replacement for the 'America Redefined' phrase, is just the final nail in the coffin of a death that began with the quiet, subtle, reversal of the glorious Civil Rights movement of the 1960's with a Judiciary intent on overthrowing our government 'of the people, by the people, and for the people', with the aid of Attorneys who play word games to exempt a few from any accountability to any law of God or of Man.
 
'We the People' are now the 'enemy combatant', by their definition. 'We the People' are the 'threat of terrorism' that justifies any and all 'pre-emptive' strike, with a license to invade our privacy, our homes, and even torture us. No 'nationality', including those of us who are of American nationality, is protected. This is why it is so extremely distressing to me to hear some of my fellow Americans dismiss, or attempt to justify, the torture of Iraqis or any other Individual Human Being of any Nationality or caught outside the borders of their homeland. 'We the People' in and of America, are just as much at risk, and maybe more at risk, of being subjected to the same treatment inflicted on those held in Guantanamo or Abu Ghrab, as our Government has turned against ALL of us who are not part of It.
 
Those that give up essential Liberties for the mere appearance of safety, will lose both Liberty and Safety. It is a MYTH that Liberty and Security are Mutually Exclusive. In fact; you cannot have one without the other.
 
I speak from real world experience as one who has attempted to hold criminals and terrorists, hiding in our government in positions of public trust, accountable to the law. Our 'protectors', the Attorney General and his Office for the State of Texas, and the Department of Justice, will stop at nothing to protect them with free legal services at the expense of our Nation's Treasury. Even after attaining several judgments on the Law and on the Facts, by some judicial Officials, acknowledging the acts were criminal and terroristic, (committed while Bush was Governor here) they continue to Obstruct Justice for those they consider 'Nobles' by title of employment by election, selection, or appointment to a position in government.
 
_____
 
By Ed44, with all rights, privileges, and immunities of copyright reserved.
<http://www.informed.org>www.informed.org
Join our Experiment in OpenLaw
_________
 
Let us Make a Name (Shem) for ourselves and be as gods

e-mails received from Jason Guenther

http://www25.brinkster.com/lowestroom/main.html

jason wrote:

>>>>Ya, your right. See. i know LUCIFER is a valid name because thats what THEY call him. however, in the scripture, my beef is not the validaity of the name, but the the "DECEPTION" of changing the text to hide stuff. Ya know Rob, what theyve in fact done is "NOACHIDED" the bibles ever so subtilly!!!. I dont see any other way to describe it, but they have intentionally "GENTILED/GREEKED" the text to hide what the hebrew in fact says!>>>>

jason

Southern American Marketing, Inc. wrote:
But, at the same time it was written in aramic, hebrew and latin over Jesus the King of Kings
 
so the Lucifer and strongs reference is exactly that, when this Moshaich comes in his own name that is exactly what he is the boasting one

___

Southern American Marketing, Inc. wrote:
They rejected the WRITTEN WORD of Moses...see Daniel's Vision of the first about the last end of the indignation.....and since it clearly testified of Jesus and their hatred
 
they manufactured another Torah....the Oral tradition./.......the Mishnah Torah

>>>>yes, I agree that Moses WROTE the word and yes I agree that they "ORALED" it all up, but I also belive what God says.....THE PEN OF THE SCRIBES IS IN VAIN!. God could not have been talking about the prophets who were ordained to pen the word, but those who came after who TRANSLITERATED and RE-INTEREPRETED then "added" and "took away" from the text IN the bible and OUT with oral traditions!. When "ORAL TRADITION" is incited it points only to TALMUD etc. and this just is not the case. The church has ORAL TRADITIONS of the NT that are but "RE_INTEREPRETATION" of the text, and whether it be written or not is irrelevant. See, when I criticize the scriptures Rob , Im not criticizing the word itself, Im criticizing the "RE_INTERPRETATION of that text "WRITTEN IN THE VERY BIBLE IM READING"!. The bible itself is......."PURE".....in that it contains THE TRUTH and also a record of the LIES/REBELLION of that text the scribes penned. God is TRUTH and as such he gives freely ALL THE TRUTH, the good he gave and DOES NOT HIDE the evil they say!. Anyhow, was just swimming in that last night.<<<

jason

______

Southern American Marketing, Inc. wrote:
You know I am about to come to the conclusion that all of that does not matter in this day...either they believe or they don't
 
But I understand clearly what you say...clearly and i see it
 
and now i know why they needed so many DIFFERENT translations
 
to muddy it even further
to make them all false
 
and then they could say SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

jason wrote:

YOU GOT IT!. "IF" God gave the responsibility to the "oracles" of God and they killed them for what they said and "WROTE", how can anyone think for a moment that if they went to the extent of killing them, they would leave the writing un-touched, SEEING HOW THIS IS WHAT DROVE THEM TO KILL IN THE FIRST PLACE???. And, if they killed the Word INCARNATE, I don't doubt for a second that they mutilated the Word thourougly, and understand why Christ said "continue in the word" because after enough gleaning and searching, "THE SPIRIT", and not vain "intellect" reveals these truths. Yea, we see!.

_____

Southern American Marketing, Inc. wrote:
Yeah...they crucified the author...they slew the Prophets he rose early and sent...they slew the disciples....they beheaded  Esaias......... John the Baptist.....
 
and they produced abominable works
 
but remember they could not have done it at one time for there would not be one shem in the universe left if they had


Absolutely, the Lords STRANGE ACT. Now Rob, what is fact says its "jew"....IS NOT.....but is part of 1/3rd OF HEAVEN that got hoofed out!. BUT, that which says its "jew" has USURPED the body/temple/"HUMAN' and holds it hostage. Rob, they SAY they are not..."human"......but ABOVE that.....god's.

 They say they want a PLANET OF THEIR OWN. They say they are the MASTERS and us....heathen, goyim, gentiles, chattle.....are but for THEIR PLEASURE as slaves for food, clothing industry. herein we know we fight now against FLESH AND BLOOD because jewry is NOT flesh and blood "AND THATS WHY THEY SAY IT IS.....THE LIE"!!!.  The liars NEVER tell the truth. If they say its BLACK then its WHITE. If they say JEWRY IS FLESH AND BLOOD, its not,....ITS SPIRIT......and that not of God.<<<<

jason


jason wrote:

Rob,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for
the manifestation of the sons of God.
(aka BNAI HA ELOHIYM)
[Romans 8:19]


Go on in the verses Rob, the "CREATION" and earnest expectation of "THE CREATURE" (not the spirit) awaits the......."MANIFESTATION"..............of the BNI HA ELOHIYM and why???? Because the creation "GROANS TO BE RELEASED" and to obtain "incorruptable". Thus, the  the "REVELATION" or REVEALING (thats what MANIFESTATION means) is of........"THE DEVILS KIDS DUDE and why????. Because, the Lords "stars" are called......."MORNING STARS".....and the devils....."SONS OF GOD/BNAI HASHEM/ELOHIYM" (Job 38:7), "two seeds", two kinds of "sons", two types of "STARS"!!!. The revelaing of the "SHAMES" is what brings the lambs WRATH and thus "creation dissolved" so that INCORRUPTIBLE can prevail. Roms. 8 is "NOT" talking about the saints but the "SHEMS"......

Raging waves of the sea,
foaming out their own .....
s-h-a-m-e;

{SHEM/NAME}

wandering stars,
 to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.
[Jude 13]



Dude, THE "SHAMES" HAVE "FALLEN"/BEEN CAST DOWN "IN" THE EARTH/ HAVE ARRIVED!!!!

___

jason wrote:

Rob.........

These are the sons of Shem,
 after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, after their nations.
These are the families of the sons of Noah,
after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood. And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar. And they said,
Go to, let us build us a city and a tower,
whose top may reach unto heaven; and
let us make us a
(SHEM/SHAME/)
NAME,
 lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

 lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

And THE HASHEM came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
And THE HASHEM said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language (1 Cor.14:43), that they may not understand one another’s speech. So THE "I AM THAT I AM JESUS" scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.  Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because THE HASHEM did there confound the language of all the earth:(Jer.50:1-12, 51:17, Ezek.36:32, Zech.10:5, ACTS 9:22,
 1 Pet. 2:6! etc.)
and from thence did THE I AM scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.
These are the generations of Shem:
Shem was an hundred years old, and begat Arphaxad two years after the flood:
[Genesis 10:31-32, 11:1-10]

NAME
Strongs 8034 shem, shame; a prim. word [perh. rather from 7760 through the idea of def. and "CONSPICUIOUS POSITION"; comp. 8064]; an apellation, AS "A MARK" OR MEMORIAL OF INDIVIDUALITY MARK" OR MEMORIAL OF INDIVIDUALITY: by impl. HONOR, AUTHORITY, character:- + base, [-in] fame [-ous], name [-d], RENOWN, REPORT.

THIS IS THE CORRECT INTERPRETATION!!!. God is "NOT" the author of "CONFUSION", the "HA SHEM's" ARE"!!!!. "US, OUR, WE" in the Torah is "CABAL, CABBALA, CABBALED" respectiviely, its hidden by the "GREEK" replacements in translation. "THE MARK" Rob is....."THE SHEM/NAME".....and its is "IN" them, they speak/teach/preach it to the inhabitants.....AND THEY ALL DENY CHRIST JESUS!....NOT PHYSICAL, "SPIRITUAL" AND ONLY....."WORDS"....ARE THE EVIDENCE JUST JESUS SAID!!!!. (ye shall be judged by EVERY WORD that pro-seed-eth from your mouth!). You can TELL if Satan is "IN" someone, the....SHEM/SHAME.....is in them!. Nothing that is "SHAMED" or "ASHAMED" makes it into the kingdom. If you are allowed access to the GARDEN via the "FLAMING SWORD THAT TURNETH EVERY WHICH WAY" and you have a "fig leaf" on dude.....YOUR TOAST.....and is why "CURSED IS CANAAN" for being "ashamed" of Noah drunk in the tent!. Every human must SEEK OUT THE GARDEN OF EDEN for it was at the garden that man fell. Is why you must become as a LITTLE CHILD for "children have NO SHAME" and are innocent till their eyes opened later on!. The very appearance of those with "SHEM'S/SHAME" in them is WHITED SEPHULCHRE's!!. They have NO concept whatsoever of the efficacy of Gods GRACE and are rank legalists working under THE LAW OF THE SHEM'S......."GRACE",,,,,,,is the "mark" of one not baring a SHEM in them "made by mammon"!!1. "ITS THE NAME"!!!.

___

jason wrote

1 ¶  Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin:
2  That walk to go down into Egypt, and have not asked at my mouth; to strengthen themselves in the strength of Pharaoh, and to trust in the shadow of Egypt!
3  Therefore shall the strength of Pharaoh be your shame, and the trust in the shadow of Egypt your confusion.
4  For his princes were at Zoan, and his ambassadors came to Hanes.
5  They were all ashamed of a people that could not profit them, nor be an help nor profit, but a shame, and also a reproach.

trongs 8034 shem, shame; a prim. word [perh. rather from 7760 through the idea of def. and "CONSPICUIOUS POSITION"; comp. 8064]; an apellation, AS "A MARK" OR MEMORIAL OF INDIVIDUALITY: by impl. HONOR, AUTHORITY, character:- + base, [-in] fame [-ous], name [-d], RENOWN, REPORT.

___

jason wrote:

Rob, "WHAT" is that "little book", the one that is eaten then becomes BITTER that all holy prophets "eat" and their eyes opened?????

1 ¶  Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin:
2  That walk to go down into Egypt, and have not asked at my mouth; to strengthen themselves in the strength of Pharaoh, and to trust in the shadow of Egypt!

"Come to Pharaoh", saith the Chassidim Lubavitch


3  Therefore shall the strength of Pharaoh be your shame, and the trust in the shadow of Egypt your confusion.
4  For his princes were at Zoan, and his ambassadors came to Hanes.
They were all ashamed of a people that could not profit them, nor be an help nor profit, but a shame, and also a reproach.
6  The burden of the beasts of the south: into the land of trouble and anguish, from whence come the young and old lion, the viper and fiery flying serpent, they will carry their riches upon the shoulders of young asses, and their treasures upon the bunches of camels, to a people that shall not profit them.

See Daniel, they take the Gold and silver unto their gods of Egypt...after WTC September 11, 2001 when Judah attacked Dan the king of the North


7  For the Egyptians shall help in vain, and to no purpose: therefore have I cried concerning this, Their strength is to sit still.
8 ¶  Now go, write it before them in a table(a table is "OF THE HEART"!), and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever:

Bitterness


That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the LORD:(THE TRUTH OF THE SHEM'S, LYING CHILDREN ARE ONLY SATAN'S FOR "NO LIAR" SHALL ENTER IN!!)
10  Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits:

who slew the Prophets of the IAM


11  Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One (Jesus!) of Israel to cease from before us.

so they cried out "Let his Blood be on our hands and our children for we have made a shem for ourselves"
12  Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel, Because ye despise this word, and trust in oppression and perverseness, and stay thereon:
13  Therefore this iniquity (satan worship......as god's)  shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant.
14  And he shall break it as the breaking of the potters’ vessel that is broken in pieces; he shall not spare: so that there shall not be found in the bursting of it a sherd to take fire from the hearth, or to take water withal out of the pit.

see www.samliquidation.com/chabad_wall.htm

jason wrote:

Rob, im 100% convinced the "ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION" already STANDS in
the "HOLY PLACE/TEMPLE OF GOD/PEOPLE"!!!. Dude......FLEE TOO THE
MOUNTAINS.....and tell all those in JUDEA to do the same!. "IM TELLIN YA
"SUDDEN" DESTRUCTION" CAN COME AT ANY MOMENT FOR EVERYTHING IS "SET IN
PLACE" AND HAS TAKEN PLACE!!!. Dude, ya better turn your eyes from
"MAN/MAMMON/FLESH & BLOOD" and stop waiting for MOShIACH BEN MAMMON to
return cuz HES HERE ALREADY in his children and the Lords wrath is
coming "BECAUSE OF HIS TEMPLE DUDE"!!!. Im tellin ya that the
"HASHEMS/JEWS/SHEM/SAYERS" are the BNAI HA SHEM/ELOHIYMS, Satan and his
angels are cast down and "HERE NOW ALREADY" in the "sanctuary of
strength".....THE HOLY PLACE!!!. Nope, there is gonna be NO sacrifices
on the temple mount....THATS A LIE, ITS NOT GONNA HAPPEN THAT
WAY....."ITS ALREADY HAPPENED"!!!

_____

jason wrote:

Rob..........

19  For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for
the manifestation (REVEALING) of the sons of God/BNAI HA SHEMS/ELOHIYMS.

the god's of their shame of shem


20  For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
21  Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
22  For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.
23  And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.

{InCORRUPTABLE ONLY COMES WHEN ALL THIS IS "DISSOLVED"/DAY OF THE LORD AND SUDDEN DESTRUCTION!!}

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come,
 except there come a falling away first,
and that man of sin be revealed
(MANIFESTATION)
, the son of perdition;

Who opposeth and exalteth himself above
all that is called God, or that is worshipped;
so that he as God sitteth in the  temple of God,
shewing himself that he is God.

Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work:
 only he who now letteth will let,
 until ....he.... be
taken out of the way
.

{John 7:34!}
And then shall that
W i c k e d

b e   r e v e a l e d,
(MANIFESTATION!)

whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth,
and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness ....in.... them that perish;
 because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion,
 that they should believe..... a lie:(Jn.8:44)

That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
[2 Thessalonians 2:3-12]


When ye therefore shall
"s e e"
the abomination of desolation,
spoken of by Daniel the prophet,
*s t a n d i n g*
 in the holy place
(Psa.46:4),

(whoso readeth, let him understand:)
Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
[Matthew 24:15-16]


And arms shall stand on his part,
and they shall pollute
the sanctuary of strength,

(1 Sam.15:29, 22:33, 2 Cor.12:9, 6:16)
and shall take away the daily sacrifice,
(Mt.9:13, 9:49, 12:1, Heb.10:8-26, Psa.4:5, 27:6, 51:17, 107:22,  Jer:17:26, 1 Cor.10:20)

and they shall place the abomination
that maketh desolate.

[Daniel 11:31]


Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
Behold, your house (TEMPLE!) is left unto you desolate.
 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple:
and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
[Matthew 23:36-39, 24:1]


But ye are they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number. Therefore will I number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to the slaughter: because when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein I delighted not. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, my servants shall eat, but ye shall be hungry: behold, my servants shall drink, but ye shall be thirsty: behold, my servants shall rejoice, but ye shall be ashamed: Behold, my servants shall sing for joy of heart, but ye shall cry for sorrow of heart, and shall howl for vexation of spirit.
And ye shall leave your
SHEM/SHAME/
NAME

for a curse unto my chosen:

 for the Lord GOD shall slay thee,
 and call his servants by
another SHEM/NAME:

(JESUS CHRIST - CHRISTIANS)
[Isaiah 65:11-15]


Let them bring them forth, and shew us what shall happen: let them shew the former things, what they be, that we may consider them, and know the latter end of them; or declare us things for to come. Shew the things that are to come hereafter,
that we may know that ye are gods:
 yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together.
Behold, ye are of nothing, and your work of nought:
an abomination is he that chooseth you.....(the "Robber")
 I have raised up one from the north, (DAN) and he shall come: from the 'rising of the sun' shall he call upon my name: and he shall come upon princes as upon mortar, and as the potter treadeth clay.
[Isaiah 17:22-25]


Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
For there are certain men crept in unawares,
who were before of old ordained to this condemnation,
ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, --- our Lord Jesus Christ. I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt,

afterward destroyed them that believed not.
And
the angels/Bnai Ha Shems/Elohiyms
which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication,

 and going after "strange flesh",
are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
[Jude 3-7]


 THE "WICKED" HAS BEEN REVEALED NO DOUBT!

 

_______

The Son Of Patriot
Act Also Rises
hoodlum haba
By Kim Zetter
Wired News
6-14-4
 
While activists and politicians work to repeal or change parts of the Patriot Act that they say violate constitutional rights, Patriot Act II legislation -- which caused a stir when it came to light last year -- is rearing its head again in a new bill making its way through Congress.
 
The bill would strengthen laws that let the FBI demand that businesses hand over confidential records about patrons by assigning stiff penalties (up to five years in prison) to anyone who discloses that the FBI made the demand. The bill would also let the FBI compel businesses to cooperate with record requests, and it would expand the government's secret surveillance powers over noncitizens in the United States.
 
"There is no reason for this legislation," said lawyer Chip Pitts, head of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee of Dallas and a former constitutional law professor. "Given the expanse of powers and secrecy already granted in the Patriot Act, and given the unclear security benefits and possible security detriments of that legislation, why do we need a further amendment of the law to grant more powers to the government?"
 
The bill, known as the Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of 2003, or HR 3179, was introduced last September by Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin) and was co-sponsored by Rep. Porter Goss (R-Florida), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a possible contender to replace departing CIA chief George Tenet.
 
It contains four sections that first appeared in a proposed piece of legislation dubbed Patriot Act II. That proposed law was discovered last year by the Center for Public Integrity just weeks before the invasion of Iraq. Patriot Act II, or "Son of Patriot" as critics called it, was written by the Justice Department to expand Patriot Act powers, but the department was forced to shelve the proposal after news of it created an uproar.
 
Judeo-Churchizionian Patriots to zion of ISREALHELL of Is Ra El? Is EL Ra? Is abaddon Ra the god of the sun they worshipped in the House of the Lord that the Lord Said Ezekeil dig into the wall and see the abomination these who have made a name/shem for themselves do? Who hath his name in the Greek tongue Apolluon, and in the Egyptian tongue Horus RA. Who have a king over them...the self made gods unto this their god king RA?
 
But critics, like conservative former Rep. Bob Barr (R-Georgia), say that rather than abandoning the legislation altogether, the department has been extracting provisions and having sympathetic lawmakers slip them one by one into new bills to pass the legislation piecemeal. At least five other bills pending in Congress also contain provisions from Patriot Act II, but HR 3179 is the one that's in imminent danger of being passed under the radar.
 
Last year, a Patriot Act II provision was slipped into the Intelligence Authorization Act of 2004 at the last minute and passed quickly before legislators opposed to it had time to fully examine it. The Intelligence Authorization Act, an annual bill that allocates funds for intelligence agencies, is a must-pass bill that generally gets drafted and passed quickly in secrecy.
 
The new bill, HR 3179, was set to pass through Congress without a hearing last year, but the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Sensenbrenner, changed its mind and held a hearing May 18. The bill is waiting for markup in that committee, but critics fear that Rep. Goss and the House Intelligence Committee will slip the bill into this year's Intelligence Authorization Act during a closed-door hearing on June 16, and pass it quickly before lawmakers can revise or further debate it.
 
Proponents of HR 3179 say critics are overreacting to the bill. They say the bill will simply "plug a few gaps" in the Patriot Act by establishing penalties for noncompliance that were never specified in the Patriot Act.
 
So was the Enablink AKT of the Talmudicist Theosophist Hitler the hired hand
 
But opponents say the bill grants the government more power to investigate people without probable cause and to do so under a cloak of secrecy. As a result, individuals being investigated will have no chance to protest unconstitutional searches and seizures.
 
No Due Process of the Constitution FOR the United States
 
Under the Patriot Act and Patriot Act II provisions passed in the Intelligence Authorization Act last year, the FBI doesn't need a court order or probable cause to obtain the transaction records for patrons of libraries, Internet service providers, telephone companies, casinos, travel agents, jewelers, car dealers or other businesses.
 
The FBI can simply draft a "national security letter" stating records are needed for a national security investigation, without being specific about the data being sought or the people being investigated. A nondisclosure provision prevents the letter recipient from telling anyone about it, including patrons whose records may be investigated.
 
The Kestapo
KGB
 
Under HR 3179, anyone who knowingly violates the secrecy clause could be imprisoned for up to a year, and anyone who violates it with "the intent to obstruct an investigation or judicial proceeding" could be imprisoned up to five years. The bill also lets authorities force individuals and companies to comply with security letters under contempt-of-court threats.
 
Jeff Lungren, spokesman for the House Judiciary Committee where the bill currently resides, said HR 3179 simply gives teeth to the Patriot Act.
 
Simply make more treasonous comrad's
 
"Right now you can't disclose if you receive a national security letter," he said. "But if you do disclose it, there is no penalty for that. There's (also) no stick to deal with a person that refuses to comply with a national security letter."
 
But Jim Dempsey, director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, said the bill tips the balance of power further into government hands while hampering the ability of people "to push back" and provide balance to government powers.
 
No grievance
 
Currently, if government investigators request data that is too broad or intrusive, a company has some wiggle room to protect patrons' Fourth Amendment rights by resisting and negotiating a more targeted search, Dempsey said. But letting the FBI force cooperation while at the same time demanding secrecy and threatening imprisonment would make it unlikely that unreasonable secretive searches would ever be prevented or challenged.
 
Goodbye Government Dissent. Goodbye all Amendment RIGHTS.....that they haha, have given us.......
 
"It's a way to increase the government's leverage," Dempsey said, noting that no company employee would want to go to jail for 30 days, let alone five years, to defend the privacy of the company's patrons.
 
No, they will willingly give them up to be afflicted and slain at Abu Ghraib like Torture prisons of the Ministry of Truth
 
Dempsey said he believes the original Patriot Act didn't specify penalties for disclosure because lawmakers were ambivalent about the act's powers and didn't want to eliminate opportunities for checks and balances.
 
Like Three divisions of the US Constitutional Government ?
 
Steve Lilienthal, director of the Center for Privacy and Technology Policy at the conservative Free Congress Foundation, said the gag rule is 
"a license for abuse."
 
"You have the right to talk to an attorney, but the attorney cannot talk to anyone else," he said. "You're prevented from going to the Department of Justice to communicate, or to the relevant congressional community to tell them when an abuse has taken place. It's almost un-American."
 
In addition to penalties for disclosure, HR 3179 expands surveillance of noncitizens by amending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, or FISA. Currently FISA investigations involve individuals or groups acting on behalf of a foreign government or terrorist organization. But HR 3179 would let the government conduct secret domestic surveillance against noncitizens believed to be engaged in international terrorism, but who have no known affiliation with a foreign government or terrorist group.
 
Pitts, the attorney with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, said the amendment could be used to justify surveillance of noncitizens for criminal activity, for work with organizations like Amnesty International or for donating money to an environmental organization that stages protests.
 
"Because there is no accepted definition of international terrorism, and because they're eliminating the need for someone to be acting on behalf of a foreign government, you're relying on subjective and perhaps arbitrary or politically motivated definitions" to determine who could be secretly investigated, he said.
 
Barr, a member of the American Conservative Union who has been practicing law since leaving Congress last year, testified against the bill during the May hearing and said that Congress should not be passing new laws to strengthen the Patriot Act while there are concerns about how the legislation has been used to date. The FBI has admitted using the Patriot Act for nonterrorism investigations, such as cases involving corruption in a Las Vegas strip club, drug trafficking and other criminal activity.
 
Barr said the surveillance powers of the Patriot Act play "fast and loose" with the Constitution and that the secrecy penalties in HR 3179 would make its assault on the Fourth Amendment even worse.
 
"If the government is able to conduct its powers in secret, then we never know the extent to which its power is being used or being abused," he said. "If the government wants to conduct more of its business in secret and without probable cause, then (we should) just amend or repeal the Fourth Amendment, not allow the government to eat away at it in small steps and pretend it's still there."
 
Barr said the law should allow recipients of national security letters the right to challenge them, just as they can challenge grand jury subpoenas.
 
The American Civil Liberties Union recently discovered just how daunting the secrecy provisions can be when it was forced to file a lawsuit in secret that challenged the constitutionality of national security letters under the First Amendment. The organization was able to reveal the existence of the lawsuit only after negotiating with the government about what it could say about the suit.
 
The lawsuit was filed after the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act request for information about how often and in what cases authorities have used national security letters to date, and the organization received six pages of blacked-out documents.
 
Pitts said that although HR 3179 is not yet on the radar screen of most congress members, activists are working to thwart what he calls a "stealth measure."
 
"The last time (a Patriot Act II provision) slipped through and got signed was on the day of Saddam Hussein's capture," Pitts said. "There was not a single activist who knew it was coming down the pike. At least this time we know about it in advance."
 
In total, six bills pending in Congress contain provisions taken from Patriot Act II. In addition to HR 3179, three other House bills (and two Senate companion bills) were introduced late last year:
 
HR 3179: Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of 2003 HR 3037: Anti-Terrorism Tools Enhancement Act of 2003 HR 2934 and S 1604: Terrorist Penalties Enhancement Act of 2003 HR 3040 and S 1606: Pretrial Detention and Lifetime Supervision of Terrorists Act of 2003.
 
© Copyright 2004, Lycos, Inc. All Rights Reserved. http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,63800,00.html
 
http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,63800,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1


Hoodlum haha of the "SAYERS" the shem gods

______

The best way to establish the shem sham is to shut up the anti-Shem-ites, like they attempted to shut up the Nazarene, who is Forever.

Israeli Nationals, Nukes,
And Attacks On US
Nuclear Facilities

This Memo was sent via John Kaminski
Memo To FBI Agent Colleen Rowley
From R. Leland Lehrman
6-12-4
 
Colleen -
 
I have never contacted the FBI before for any reason, and would not have if I were not convinced that at least one FBI agent there was honest. That's you.
 
I was shocked and distressed by the attitude of the FBI leadership to your work prior to 9/11 and was completely supportive of your Woman of the Year award.
 
Because of your willingness to work towards accountability in the FBI, I have chosen to bring you this analysis.
 
The basic premise is that Israeli nationals, recently busted all around the country, are part of a possible attack on the United States, perhaps even involving nuclear weapons or an attack on nuclear facilities.
 
To say such a thing is considered political suicide, given the power of the Israeli lobby, but perhaps you will be willing to at least look at the below published news reports and documents.
 
Let's go backwards first.
 
The most recent incident was at King's Bay Naval Nuclear Facility:
 
http://www.news4jax.com/news4georgia/3344771/detail.html
 
http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/052204/geo_15672724.shtml
 
The news reports describe the fact that the dogs alerted to the scent of explosives and there was a remote control robot in a suitcase in the van.
 
Daniel Hopsicker has additional details at:
 
http://madcowprod.com/index58.html
and
http://madcowprod.com/index59.html
 
Additional context is found here:
 
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=51595
 
 
Prior to that incident, Israeli "movers" including the son of the Likud Party spokesperson Shmuel Dahan were busted in Tennessee near the Nuclear Fuel Services plant in Erwin.
 
Details on that investigation, with notes on other incidents involving Israeli movers are here:
 
http://madcowprod.com/index54.html
 
Previous busts include Pennsylvania with a video of the Sears Tower:
 
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/sears2.html
 
Whidbey Island Naval Station: (scroll down the page for the Whidbey Article)
 
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=49488
 
 
Cloudcroft New Mexico:
 
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/globemovers.htm
 
"The Midwest":
 
http://www.miami.com/herald/special/news/terrorism/digdocs/088964.htm
 
and of course NYC:
 
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
 
 
Dominic Suter, the head of the moving company to which the Mossad agents were attached in the NYC case ended up on an FBI terrorist watch list distributed to the Italian banking authorities. I have a copy of that watch list which I will forward to you when I can find it.
 
Two more remaining contextual details of high importance are the Israeli art student spy-ring in Florida and around the country documented in the DEA/FBI report.
 
Synopsis here:
 
http://www.atlanta.creativeloafing.com/2002-03-20/fishwrapper.html
 
 
Full report here:
 
http://cryptome.org/dea-il-spy.htm
 
 
and the Fox News Report that got pulled:
 
http://100777.com/node/view/180
 
Today, I have heard that the National Enquirer is running a story that MI5 and Mossad are alleging that al Qaeda has planted weapons around the USA. Mossad has a history of planting misleading rumors in the press prior to their attacks. Documentation for that claim appears in Mossad whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky's books, By Way of Deception and The Other Side of Deception. One of my sources, a former Captain in Military Intelligence, and I think the Mossad may be much more involved than that. They have a history of attacking the US and blaming the Arabs or calling it an accident. See:
 
http://www.ussliberty.org
 
and
 
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm
 
 
Ashcroft and Cheney keep saying they "KNOW" a terrorist attack will hit this summer. Maybe they have inside information. As we know, the top level of the US administration (Feith, Wolfowitz, Libby, Luti, Perle) has very close ties to Israel, some of them even being dual nationals like, I believe, Dov Zakheim (recently retired Pentagon Comptroller). Perle, himself was once busted spying for Israel when he was attached to Scoop Jackson's office in the Senate.
 
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/10/Richard_Perle_lowdown.html
 
Have you read Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski's pieces on Israeli generals in Feith's office?
 
http://www.peacehost.net/EPI-Calc/OpenDoor.htm
 
Here's a picture of one of the meetings:
 
http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Jan2002/020118-D-9880W-043.html
 
Altogether, I think that the QUANTITY of Israeli nationals busted spying and or possibly moving explosives (of the 120 Israeli nationals deported prior to 9/11, most were expert in explosives or signals intelligence (check DEA/FBI report for confirmation of that) prior to and after 9/11 warrants a thorough investigation and interdiction if possible. Especially given the high-level Israeli infiltration of the US civilian and military command.
 
God knows I hope I'm wrong, I hope this summer will be uneventful, but when you have the amount of context I have and the incidents keep getting more and more frequent and alarming, this citizen feels like he has to DO something. I have contacted sympathetic members of the armed forces, and now you at FBI. I will continue to contact officials with the ability to DO something about this and hope that you can recommend others who might be sympathetic. BTW, you should know about the case of FBI translator whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. Below please find the latest on that and a few odd items including the full text of the newspaper article on the Israelis busted in the Midwest.
 
Thanks for your time, please give me a call when you can.
Maybe there's something more we can do together.
 
R. Leland Lehrman
Santa Fe, NM
 
 
Dear 9/11 activists and concerned citizens, We recently received the following appeal from former FBI translator and 9/11 whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, calling for people to join her this Monday in US District Court in DC. At the hearing, Judge Reggie Walton is expected to rule on whether John Ashcroft's "State's secrets" gag order against her will stand.
 
(http://www.septembereleventh.org/edmonds/ashcroft_filing.pdf)
 
She needs our support. Please forward this email far and wide, especially to anyone you know in the DC area who might be able to attend. Details are in the letter below.
 
Towards peace and truth,
 
Emanuel Sferios
 
webmaster, 9/11 Visibility Project
http://www.septembereleventh.org
 
----------
 
An email from Sibel Edmonds:
 
For over two years Attorney General John Ashcroft has been relentlessly engaged in covering up my reports and investigations into my allegations. He has asserted the rarely invoked State Secret Privilege in my court proceedings, and has used it to quash a subpoena request for my deposition from attorneys representing 9/11 family members on information regarding 9/11.
 
Ashcroft is not protecting 'national security' or 'state secrets' of the United States. On the contrary, he is endangering our national security by covering up facts and information related to criminal and terrorist activities against this country and it's citizens.
 
Ashcroft is fully aware that making this information public will bring about the question of accountability, will expose serious criminal activities, and his complicity in covering up.
 
On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Judge Reggie Walton is expected to issue his ruling on the state secret privilege assertion by AG Ashcroft, which is intended to gag me. The hearing will be held in US District Court for the District of Columbia, located at 3rd and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, Judge Walton's courtroom. Please attend if you can, since by your presence both the court and Ashcroft will understand that this attempt to cover up will not go unnoticed.
 
I will be there, in front of the Court's Constitution Avenue entrance, at 9:30 AM, and will be joined by Daniel Ellsberg to make press statements and to meet with all of you.
 
DC Court with map
http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/location.html
 
Hope to see you there,
 
Sibel D. Edmonds
 
and
 
"AFTER CALLING CBS AT 60 MINUTES - Tanya Fimon 212 975 6631 - PLEASE FORWARD THIS ACTION REQUEST WIDE AND FAR, & post it everywhere !!
 
Regarding Sibel Edmonds' CBS 60 minutes interview.
 
CBS will be making a decision as to whether to air the interview this Sunday or the following Sunday. This decision is being made between now and tommorow morning.
 
Because Sibel Edmonds has a press conference this coming Monday and a Friday opportunity for congresspersons to meeet with her in a secured setting where she will be able to legally bypass the gag order and speak what she knows. It is vital that the CBS interview air this Sunday, thus giving time for Congress and other folks to respond to the story.
 
Its important that CBS interviews the interview this Sunday.
 
Plese call Tanya Fimon 212 975 6631, and ask her to please air the interview this sunday.
 
Thanks.
 
Other links worth checking out:
 
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/dangerous_blind_spot.html
http://www.madcowprod.com/archive.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring.html
 
Here's the news report on the Midwest Bust in full:
 
WANTED BY FBI: STILL MORE SUSPICIOUS MEN WITH ISRAELI PASSPORTS, BOX-CUTTERS, OIL PIPELINE AND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PLANS.
 
Nuclear Plants Tighten Security
 
FBI seeking 6 men seen in Midwest
 
By Martin Merzer, Curtis Morgan and Lenny Savino
The Miami Herald
October 3, 2001
 
WASHINGTON -- As the nation stands on high alert, the FBI is searching for six men stopped by police in the Midwest last weekend but released -- even though they possessed photos and descriptions of a nuclear power plant in Florida and the Trans- Alaska pipeline, a senior law enforcement official said Tuesday.
 
The Federal Aviation Administration imposed new flight restrictions around nuclear plants nationwide Tuesday, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission advised the nation's 103 nuclear plants late Monday to fortify security. On Tuesday, agency spokesmen said the FAA's flight restrictions and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's security recommendations were based on Ashcroft's general alert rather than a specific threat. Ashcroft warned that Americans could be struck by another terrorist attack this week.
 
The incident in the Midwest apparently contributed to the new warning. The six men stopped by police were traveling in groups of three in two white sedans, said a senior law enforcement official, who requested anonymity.
 
SUSPICIOUS MATERIAL
 
In addition to the photographs and other suspicious material, they carried "box cutters and other equipment,'' the official said. They appeared to be from the Middle East and held Israeli passports. They were let go after the Immigration and Naturalization Service determined that the passports were valid and that the men had entered the United States legally, the official said.
 
The FBI declined to comment. An INS spokesman called the report unfounded. "We have absolutely no information at this point in time to substantiate that story,'' said the agency's Russ Bergeron. It could not be learned in what state the six men were stopped or how they aroused suspicion. It was not known whether their true identities matched those on the passports, or why the FBI was not releasing their names or descriptions.
 
Investigators think the men almost certainly have changed cars by now and have fled to Canada or elsewhere. Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were ``furious'' that the INS allowed the men to be released without consulting the FBI, the official said. Ashcroft and Mueller appeared Monday evening at a news conference to announce that the government had ``credible'' but vague information that another wave of terrorist attacks could strike Americans within a week.
 
ON ALERT
 
Spokeswoman Rachel Scott said FPL's plants remained at the highest level of alert. "We are in very close communication with all levels of law enforcement, including the FBI, to ensure we have the security measures in place to protect the plants,'' she said. Also Tuesday, the FAA restricted all flights below 18,000 feet and within 10 miles of 86 "sensitive nuclear sites'' , the agency said. Exceptions can be made for law enforcement, medical and firefighting flights. The 800-mile-long Trans-Alaska Pipeline runs from Prudhoe Bay on the Arctic Ocean to Valdez on the Pacific.
 
R. Leland Lehrman
Santa Fe, NM
 
No plan is the best plan - Masanobu Fukuoka
 
www.miami.com/herald/special/news/terrorism/digdocs/088964.htm
 
 
Comment
From Pat
6-12-4
 
Hello again, Jeff. Am reading the article "Israeli Nationals, Nukes..." posted at your website. Do you know what is frighteningly close to Whitpain, PA? The Limerick Nuclear Power Facility.
 
http://www.nucleartourist.com/us/limerick.htm
 
You bet I want to know about this information. I live just outside of the evacuation zone and drive within spitting distance of the power plant weekly.
 
The link from the article on your website fails to mention the close proximity of Limerick to the Whitpain area where the suspects were detained. Thought you might want to know.

____

Teacher jailed for making revisionist  film

SUSAN BELL IN PARIS

A TEACHER banned from working in France for peddling revisionist views on the Holocaust has been sentenced to two years in prison by a French court after he made a film contesting a brutal Second World War massacre by Nazi SS storm-troopers.

The conviction of Vincent Reynouard, 33, coincides with the 60th anniversary today of the slaughter of 642 villagers, including 245 women and 207 children, at Oradour-sur-Glane on 10 June, 1944, four days after the D-Day landings by Allied forces.

In his film entitled The Tragedy of Oradour-sur-Glane: 50 Years of Official Lies, Reynouard blamed the inhabitants of the tiny Limousin village for their fate.

Disputing evidence of eyewitness survivors, the former teacher denied that the SS deliberately killed more than 350 women and children after rounding them up and ordering them into the village church, arguing that the deaths were due to explosives concealed in the church by members of the French Resistance active in Oradour.

Reynouard had sent videos of his film, along with order forms for additional copies, to the last two living survivors of the massacre, the village memorial centre (now a national war memorial and museum) and to the mayor of Oradour and numerous villagers.

Reynouard was first convicted in 1991 of distributing revisionist literature when he was a student in Caen, in Normandy. Six years later he was sacked from his post as a maths teacher at a technical college in nearby Honfleur, after he set homework involving counting Dachau concentration-camp victims and was discovered to have stored revisionist documents denying the Holocaust on the school computer.

Reynouard was eventually banned from teaching anywhere in France. He also wrote a revisionist book questioning the Nazi slaughter entitled The Oradour Massacre: A Half-Century of Theatre.

In 1998, some 500 French and German copies of the book were seized by police in Brussels and the Flemish port city of Antwerp at the request of French judicial authorities.

Reynouard’s sentence was handed down by the Limoges appeals court, which said that his film had insulted the memory of those who had been massacred.

The court doubled his original prison sentence, but reduced his fine of 10,000 (£6,688), ordering him instead to pay 1,000 (£668) in damages to each of the three civil parties in the case, including Marcel Darthout, one of the last two survivors of the massacre still alive today.

Today, only the stone skeleton of the original Oradour-sur-Glane remains. The late president Charles de Gaulle ordered that the charred ruins of the village should be left as a memorial to the suffering of France under the Nazi occupation and a new village was constructed nearby.

A rusting bicycle, a blackened iron bedstead and the charred wreckage of a baby carriage are still standing as a chilling reminder of the horrific events of that spring afternoon when Hitler’s troops razed the village to the ground and murdered its inhabitants.

The massacre is believed to have been a reprisal for a French Resistance attack which killed 40 Germans following the D-Day invasion.

The SS Das Reich storm-troopers were heading for Normandy when they were ordered to attack the village, a sleepy backwater near Limoges with little Resistance activity. Many historians have argued that the Nazis attacked Oradour-sur-Glane in error after mistaking it for nearby Oradour-sur-Vayres, a suspected Resistance stronghold about 15 miles away.

On their arrival, the SS rounded up children and women, many carrying babies in their arms, and marched them to the village church, where they locked them inside before throwing in grenades filled with poison gas, and opening fire.

As those who survived screamed for mercy, the SS built a human bonfire by throwing wood on to their badly injured bodies and setting it alight. Only one woman escaped from the church, by throwing herself from a 12ft-high altar window.

Among the 60 troops who perpetrated the massacre were 14 French nationals from the eastern region of Alsace, of whom all but one had been conscripted by force.

_____

Just pat yourselves on the back in your Judeo-Jaysoose wunderlandt rainbow mysticism, when you wake and say Whut happened?

 

The Day The Constitution Died
By Molly Ivins
AlterNet
6-11-4
 
AUSTIN, Texas - When, in the future, you find yourself wondering, "Whatever happened to the Constitution?" you will want to go back and look at June 8, 2004. That was the day the attorney general of the United States - a.k.a. "the nation's top law enforcement officer" - refused to provide the Senate Judiciary Committee with his department's memos concerning torture.
 
In order to justify torture, these memos declare that the president is bound by neither U.S. law nor international treaties. We have put ourselves on the same moral level as Saddam Hussein, the only difference being quantity. Quite literally, the president may as well wear a crown - forget that "no man is above the law" jazz. We used to talk about "the imperial presidency" under Nixon, but this is the real thing.
 
The Pentagon's legal staff concurred in this incredible conclusion. In a report printed by The Wall Street Journal, "Bush administration lawyers contended last year that the president wasn't bound by laws prohibiting torture and that government agents who might torture prisoners at his direction couldn't be prosecuted by the Justice Department. ...
 
"The report outlined U.S. laws and international treaties forbidding torture, and why those restrictions might be overcome by national security considerations or legal technicalities."
 
The report was complied by a group appointed by Department of Defense General Counsel William J. Haynes II, who has since been nominated by Bush for the federal appellate bench. "Air Force General Counsel Mary Walker headed the group, which comprised top civilian and uniformed lawyers from each military branch and consulted with the Justice Department, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Defense Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies. It isn't known if President Bush has ever seen the report."
 
When members of the Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Ashcroft about his department's input, he simply refused to provide the memos, without offering any legal rationale. He said President Bush had "made no order that would require or direct the violation" of laws or treaties. His explanation was that the United States is at war. "You know I condemn torture," he told Sen. Joe Biden. "I don't think it's productive, let alone justified."
 
But another memo written by former Assistant Attorney General Jay S. Bybee, now a federal appeals court judge in California, establishes a basis for the use of torture for senior Al Qaeda operatives in custody of the CIA. I am not one to leap to conclusions, but it seems quite clear how whatever perverted standards allowed at Guantanamo Bay jumped across the water to Abu Ghraib prison. Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller, commander at Gitmo, was dispatched last August to Abu Ghraib to give advice about how to get information out of prisoners. "Miller's recommendations prompted a shift in the interrogation and detention procedures there. Military intelligence officers were given greater authority in the prison, and military police guards were asked to help gather information about the detainees," according to The New York Times.
 
Among the legal memos that circulated within the administration in 2002, one is by White House counsel Alberto Gonzalez, famously declaring the Geneva Convention "quaint," and another from the CIA asked for an explicit understanding that the administration's public pledge to abide by the spirit of the Geneva Convention did not apply to its operatives. The only department consistently opposing these legal "arguments" was State. In April 2002, Secretary Rumsfeld sent a memo to Gen. James T. Hill outlining 24 permitted interrogation techniques, four of which were considered so stressful as to require Rumsfeld's explicit approval before they were used.
 
 
It has been apparent for some time that the abuses at Abu Ghraib were not isolated instances - torture from Afghanistan to Gitmo to Iraq has so far resulted in 25 deaths now under investigation. As the late Jacabo Timmermann, the Argentine journalist who was tortured during "the dirty war," said, "When you are being tortured, it doesn't really matter to you if your torturers are authoritarian or totalitarian." I doubt it helps any if they're supposed to be bringing democracy, either. And as Ashcroft said, it isn't productive.
 
The damage is incalculable. When America puts out its annual report on human rights abuses, we will be a laughingstock. I suggest a special commission headed by Sen. John McCain to dig out everyone responsible, root and branch. If the lawyers don't cooperate, perhaps we should try stripping them, anally raping them and dunking their heads under water until they think they're drowning, and see if that helps.
 
And I think it is time for citizens to take some responsibility, as well. Is this what we have come to? Is this what we want our government to do for us? Oh and by way, to my fellow political reporters who keep repeating that Bush is having a wonderful week: Why don't you think about what you stand for?
 
Molly Ivins writes for Texas Oberserver.
 
\http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18919

_____

Amaraka are you mourning for Reaganazi? Don't fret, at the end of the shem sham Rainbow, is you temporary pot of Noahide Stew and a silver spoon......

http://www.hoffman-info.com/reagan.html

Heil to the Chief

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson: Reagan's False Messiah

3. Reagan's closest religious crony was not a priest or pastor, but Menachem Mendel Schneerson, Grand Rabbi of the Chabad-Lubavitch wing of Orthodox Judaism: "Chabad's closest presidential relationship, (Avraham) Shemtov says, was with Ronald Reagan, who corresponded personally with Schneerson...Chabad delegations were both the first visitors to the White House when Reagan was elected and his last visitors on his final day in office."

The founder of Chabad-Lubavitch was Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liady, whose somewhat uncharitable doctrine that all gentiles are "completely evil," sub-human garbage ("supernal refuse"), who possess "no redeeming characteristics," is still imparted to students in Chabad-Lubavitch schools (many of these children are named "Zalman" in his honor).

In his old age, Rabbi Schneerson, did nothing to discourage the delusion that he was the Messiah. Even after Schneerson's death in 1994, many of his followers continue to claim that either he will rise from the dead or that he is in fact, still alive: "We believe that he is alive and well, and has only `disappeared' temporarily, and that he will reveal himself at any moment." --Rabbi Zimroni Tzik.

Who was and is not and yet will be?

According to Prof. David Berger, a lecturer in Jewish studies at Brooklyn College and at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, "the messianists are no longer satisfied with identifying the rebbe (Schneerson) as the Messiah, but identify him as God himself."

By proclamation, in 1983, President Reagan established the birthday of this false messiah and "god", Schneerson, (March 28), as "Education Day USA" (it has been observed on various days in the spring, including March 26, April 2 and once on Hitler's birthday, April 20; see http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/resource/speeches/1986/41986b.htm).

His birthday is based on a 354 day Talmudic Lunar-tic calendar, that is why it falls on different days

The ominous law which grew out of Reagan's repeated proclamations in Schneerson's name, Public Law 102-14, establishes a statutory obligation on Americans to obey the Talmudic interpretation of the "Noahide Laws" (a counterfeit name, since rabbinic tradition disparages Noah), which stipulate the death penalty for "avoda zara" (idol worship), of which, according to the halachic authority Maimonides, all who worship Jesus Christ, are guilty. So we have, thanks to Mr. Reagan, a law on the Federal statute books, which can be invoked at any time to establish legal grounds for executing those who worship Jesus as the second person of the Holy Trinity.

There is no TRINITY of GODS, this is where Hoffman is either in err or he too is disinformation. There is ONE LORD THY GOD, the same redeemer, the same today as yesterday and forever, the Word which hath created everything Created, the Alpha and the Omega the First and the last, the Beginning and the END, God and His Father, the Everlasting Father, Immanuel, Jesus of Nazareth, the Incarnate IMage of God himself in heaven, come to Give Man salvation, as many who will believe, My Lord and My God, who breathed His Holy Spirit to his disciples, who is the Holy Spirit and the Father and the Image he sent which HE created All mankind. 

While Jimmy Carter was the first American president to officially flirt with Chabad-Lubavitch Judaism, it was Reagan who massively collaborated with them, formally creating the legal grounds for the subsequent 1991 Public Law 102-14, with his Proclamations 5317 and 5463. All subsequent presidents have reconfirmed Reagan's proclamations, and the former Press Secretary who gave George W. Bush his hypnotic cues from the audience (watch the videotape), during Bush's Purim 2003 "we're going to war in Iraq" news conference, was the Chabad-Lubavitch agent, Ari Fleischer.

Messiah Schneerson's cult continues to command influence and remains incumbent on all top government officials, whether of the Right or the Left. For instance, Rabbi Schneerson is slated to be adored June 17, 2004 in a civic ceremony at the prestigious John F. Kennedy Library in Massachusetts. Hundreds are expected to gather for this seance, billed as "One People, One Soul." Co-sponsored by 22 Chabad Centers from greater Boston, it will feature a keynote address by Talmud expert Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz of Jerusalem, and will be graced by top US lawmakers and federal officials and who knows -- perhaps even an appearance by the late rabbi himself!

Sources: Sue Fishkoff, "The Rebbe's Army" (NY: Schocken Books, 2003), pp. 192-193; Yair Sheleg, "Waiting for a Revelation," Haaretz (Israeli newspaper), May 26, 2004; and http://www.ukar.org/gore10.html

Reagan's King Checkmates Americans' Rights

4. On November 3, 1983, Reagan signed the law establishing the third Monday of every January as the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Holiday. This law has nothing to do with the advancement of the civil rights of black people, who were saddled with a paralyzing welfare entitlement mentality commensurate with the rise of King, and who had been far better served by the empowering self-reliance creed of the now largely forgotten black educator, Booker T. Washington.

Reagan knew fully well, as he affirmed to New Hampshire Governor Meldrim Thompson, that Martin Luther King was a serial adulterer, plagiarist (having cheated on his PhD. dissertation at Boston College) and Communist party affiliate. "I have the reservations you have," Reagan wrote Thompson, "but here the perception of too many people is based on an image, not reality."

With a monumental shrug of his broad shoulders, Reagan knowingly committed one of the most treacherous acts of compromise of any president in our nation's history, signing into law the King holiday. By so doing, Mr. Reagan sentenced American children in public schools across the land to an immersion every January in King's crippling philosophy of entitlement, with its undercurrent of contempt for poor whites, whose ancestors were themselves slaves in 17th and 18th century America (not just "indentured servants").

With the exception of Abraham Lincoln, no American is studied in our public schools with the fervor and to the extent accorded Martin Luther King, not even our nation's founder, George Washington, who has been relegated mostly to serving as an icon of February clearance sales in advertisements for used cars and furniture.

King dedicated himself to overthrowing our immemorial rights to free association (i.e. the right to choose your employees and the customers you will serve in your business), and the right of private property (the right to decide to whom you will sell or rent your property). He succeeded when these rights were derogated by the misnamed Civil Rights Act of 1964. Imposing, by Federal fiat, a national holiday honoring King, institutionalizes the moral, ethical and legal rectitude of the assault on these rights.

Due to King and his enabler Reagan, we have raised a generation of American judges, legislators and students with no grasp of the necessity of these vital rights, and no memory of their hallowed, thousand year legacy. Instead, we now have millions of Americans too terrified of Federal enforcement agents to dare to hire or rent to those whom they most desire to employ or house. This represents a grievous abridgment of the civil rights of all Americans.

Morning in Reagan's America: The US as Cheap Labor Colony

5. After his reelection in 1984, Reagan began to press for the acquisition of a vast pool of coolie labor on behalf of his corporate patrons, due to the fact that most native-born Americans in that era insisted on a living wage, according to the ancient standard of the Church (I Timothy 5:18).

In order to lay the groundwork for the transformation of yeoman America into a cheap labor colony, Reagan championed a controversial amnesty scheme for millions of illegal aliens, most of whom were Mexican nationals. In 1986, Reagan triumphed, signing into law the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, granting the amnesty which almost immediately led to an unprecedented immigration invasion which has not abated to this day, and which in turn created vast financial burdens on California's medical insurance program; and the inflation of housing costs to unbearable levels, (causing many native-born Americans to be unable to afford a home in California). The American southwest has subsequently been transformed into a crime-ridden outpost of a resurgent "Aztlan." President George W. Bush has proposed another calamitous, Reagan-style amnesty for illegal aliens on the same grounds and for the benefit of the same traitorous, Antichrist, predatory capitalist interests.

to make all seventy Goyim nations equal.......share the wealth

The Commie Fighter Who Worked for the Commies

6. Ronald Reagan's foreign policy supported and maintained in power many of the protagonists in the Muslim and Arab world who have lately been branded as planetary threats to world peace, including Saddam Hussein, Reagan's ally in the Iraqi-precipitated Iran-Iraq war, and Usama bin Laden, who was armed and funded by Reagan's CIA in Afghanistan.

Reagan is alleged to be a redoubtable "Commie fighter." This risible PR spin overlooks the historic role the US government has played in ensuring the survival and expansion of the Communist slave system (in Russia by Henry Ford and Franklin D. Roosevelt; in Eastern Europe by Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman, and in China by George C. Marshall and Richard M. Nixon).

Communism only becomes vulnerable to destabilization by the US when it exhibits two defects: falling out of favor with the International Trade Cartel (Cuba) or falling out of favor with International Zionism (the USSR). Both Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson in the late 1960s and Republican Nixon in the early 1970s did ample business with the Soviet Union in ways that significantly bolstered the Soviet system.

It was only after a clear consensus emerged in New York, London and Jerusalem that the Judaics were scheduled to at long last terminate their world-historic Communist operations in Russia, and transform themselves into "victims of Communism," that Reagan was given the green light to play liberator. Yet at the same time our hero was acting this part, his Office of Special Investigations (OSI), a Federal agency which functions as an enforcement arm of international Zionism, was kidnapping elderly anti-Communist Christians and shamefully and disgracefully handing them over to the Communist butchers they had once fought. Most notorious in this regard was the Reagan administration's monstrous betrayal of the Catholic Croatian statesman Andrija Artukovic, an octogenarian who was keelhauled on a hospital gurney back to Communist Yugolslavia in 1986, to the hideous glee of vengeful Judeo-Communists.

It is patent that on those occasions when his Judaic handlers sought to have him assist vicious Communist persecution, Reagan timidly obeyed his orders and collaborated; and in those geo-political situations, such as in Russia, where, after 70 years on the road to nowhere, the Russian nation had been raped and drained to the point of collapse, and it was time for the Holy People to head for greener pastures in Brooklyn, Beverly Hills and Tel Aviv, that Reagan was allowed to step in, on cue, and assume the mantle of "Liberator of The Evil Empire."

A Hero for Split-Personalities

Amid the sawdust of the American funhouse carnival, in the double-mind of the split-personalities who people that funhouse, Ronald Wilson Reagan is a paradigm of "the good and the true" in a "world of venal compromise." This hypnotic belief is similar to the mesmeric conviction that our current President can be a Skull and Bones secret society member and a good Christian; a papally-certified Right-to-Life campaigner and the man who was instrumental in helping abortionist Alan Specter defeat the staunch anti-abortionist, Congressman Patrick Toomey, in the Republican primary battle for the US Senate in Pennsylvania.

It all makes sense, under the ensign of the grinning clown, in the funhouse chamber of thrills, chills and spills, in the words of the barker's spiel, "A hero, a giant, a knight, a prince, the king of character!" But when the klieg lights have all gone dark and the sawdust has been scattered on the wind, it is the rabbis and the witches who will write the final epitaph of the Reagan legacy, "Solve et coagula."

Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of six books, including Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare 2001.

______

The god's...the shems...the Elohym...of shame....they who reject the Creator, who have created the "Replacement Theology" the sons of hashem....the nephillim..........who Jesus said were of their father the Liar, who is the murderer since the beginning....the "SAYERS" who are in no wise the seed of Abraham in faith of jesus the Christ, they who slew him....of the Robber.......and their proselytes....the Judeo-Churchi-zionians of the Talmudic Noahide persuasion will follow up on their standard of Talmudic Torture. Soon, very soon the sayers and their servants their followers of their fables...will stage a "TERRORIST" incident and blame it on a fundamental CHRISTIAN....who they will call a "hater" and an anti-shem....and all their Judeo-Churchi-zionians of mammon will cry for their blood.....hence any who Stand firm for the Head "anti-Shem-god"  GOD, Jesus the Creator.....will become "Talmudic Terrorist" and will be convicted by one shem witness and one shem elohynm judge........Prepare in Jesus the Christ Mighty name....and know ye this....the seed of the serpent is forever defeated at Calvary and since the beginning of the World by the LAMB of God....the demon's are loosed upon the earth.......

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/061504A.shtml

Nuremberg Revised
    By William Rivers Pitt
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

    Tuesday 15 June 2004

    The document is titled 'Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under U.S.C. 2340-2340A.' It is a memo dated August 1, 2002, and was written at the specific request of Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President of the United States of America.

    U.S.C. 2340, one of two sections of the U.S. Code referred to in the August 1 memo, reads as follows:

(1) "torture" means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control;
(2) "severe mental pain or suffering" means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from -
(a) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;
(b) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;
(c) the threat of imminent death; or
(d) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality.

    U.S.C. 2340A reads as follows:

(a) Offense. - Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(b) Jurisdiction. - There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection A if -

 

(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender.

    The first paragraph of the August 1 memo to Gonzales reads as follows:

We conclude below that Section 2340A proscribes acts inflicting, and that are specifically intended to inflict, severe pain or suffering, whether mental or physical. Those acts must be of an extreme nature to rise to the level of torture within the meaning of Section 2340A and the Convention. We further conclude that certain acts may be cruel, inhuman or degrading but still not produce pain and suffering of the requisite intensity to fall within 2340A's proscription against torture.

    'The Convention' referred to in that paragraph is the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which was ratified by the United States in 1994. As with any treaty ratified by the U.S., the Convention against Torture carries the full force of law.

    Note well the import of that first paragraph from the August 1 memo. The argument leaps blithely over the definitions of torture as described in U.S.C 2340, and proceeds directly to the import of 2340A, the section which demands a 20 year prison term for any American who tortures another human being. If the person being tortured should die, U.S.C. 2340A demands the death penalty for the American responsible.

    The limited series of photographs which has been released from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq requires us, as American citizens, to consider carefully those definitions of torture in U.S.C. 2340. They are straightforward and unambiguous, as an American law should be.

    A review of a segment of the photographs released from Abu Ghraib reveals:

Men ordered to masturbate in front of each other and in front of female American soldiers, a humiliating experience which offends their religion (see: "The application of procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality");

 

 

    This is what we have been allowed to see, but there is more. Seymour Hersh, the reporter who first broke the Abu Ghraib story, spoke recently at the University of Chicago. Hersh is one of the few people alive today who has seen all of the photographic evidence of the torture which took place in that prison. "You haven't begun to see evil," he said, "horrible things done to the children of women prisoners, as the cameras run." Words like "Rape" and "Murder" have been used to describe the evidence which remains as yet unreleased.

    The Bush administration is scrambling to defend itself against accusations that section 2340 has been grossly violated with intent, which means a number of American officials stand in peril of punishment as demanded by section 2340A. Not long ago, administration officials described the barbarism at Abu Ghraib as the rogue behavior of a few wretches, and not a policy deliberately formulated and put into effect. The leaking of memos like that from August 1st, several of which have since been deemed 'Classified' and which Attorney General Ashcroft is refusing to release, prove this defense to be a bald-faced lie.

    The truth is that, beginning as early as 2002, the Bush administration worked long and hard to come up with as many justifications as possible for the horrors we have seen from Abu Ghraib, the purpose of said justifications being to defend Administration officials from the punishments required by law for those who engage in the torture of their fellow human beings. The sum and substance of these defenses would hold that what happened at Abu Ghraib was not torture, and even if it was, the President of the United States can do whatever he wants.

    This broad exculpation of George W. Bush was delineated in another memo, dated March 2003, and titled 'Working Group Report on Detainee Interrogations in the Global War on Terrorism.' In this report, now classified, torture is justified because, "The president's inherent constitutional authority to manage a military campaign" frees him to behave however he wishes. By this rationale, legal prohibitions like those found in U.S.C. 2340 and the Convention against Torture, "must be construed as inapplicable to interrogations undertaken pursuant to his commander in chief authority."

    The March 2003 report goes on to say that torture can be justified by necessity. This 'Doctrine of Necessity' would have us believe that any horror performed against another human being is justified because it supposedly ensures that no more terror attacks will happen. The rationale reaches back to the disgraced and discredited Nuremberg Defense, once put forth by the Nazis, which would pardon dealers of death and agony because they were just following orders. In this case, according to these Bush administration memos, those orders came from a President not bound by law because of the aforementioned Necessity Doctrine.

    There are two clear holes in this disturbing rationale:

  1. The Convention against Torture, given the force of American law in 1996, states: "No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture." Simply put, there is no rationale available to George W. Bush or any of his people that removes them from the need to obey the law.

  2. The original reason for the development of these legal excuses for torture came about because American military and intelligence officials felt they were not getting enough information from Taliban and al Qaeda detainees using 'conventional' interrogation techniques. The people tortured in Abu Ghraib, however, were not Taliban, were not al Qaeda, were not capable of perpetrating the kind of terrorist attacks against the United States which created the rationale for this 'Necessity Doctrine' in the first place. Those tortured and killed were not terrorists, but were Iraqi civilians unjustly swept up by American forces. There is no aspect of the 'Doctrine of Necessity' which can justify the torture and murder of innocent people.

    According to the UK Telegraph, the Nuremberg Defense is about to be tested again, but this time it will be the American government under the hammer. A report from the Telegraph dated June 13th states, "New evidence that the physical abuse of detainees in Iraq and at Guantanamo Bay was authorized at the top of the Bush administration will emerge in Washington this week, adding further to pressure on the White House. The Telegraph understands that four confidential Red Cross documents implicating senior Pentagon civilians in the Abu Ghraib scandal have been passed to an American television network, which is preparing to make them public shortly."

    "According to lawyers familiar with the Red Cross reports," continues the Telegraph, "they will contradict previous testimony by senior Pentagon officials who have claimed that the abuse in the Abu Ghraib prison was an isolated incident. 'There are some extremely damaging documents around, which link senior figures to the abuses,' said Scott Horton, the former chairman of the New York Bar Association, who has been advising Pentagon lawyers unhappy at the administration's approach. 'The biggest bombs in this case have yet to be dropped.'"

    These four Red Cross documents will likely become part of the defense being mounted by attorneys representing Lynndie England, the woman featured in several Abu Ghraib photographs. England has been portrayed as some sort of Dragon Lady, one of the wretches who tortured Iraqi civilians all on their own. England's attorneys have put forth a list of 100 witnesses they intend to put on the stand to prove that she was acting under orders, and not on her own. The excuses prepared for George W. Bush and his people, like the August 1 memo and the March 2003 report, support her claim that she was just following orders.

    Some of those witnesses include Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, Defense Undersecretary for Intelligence Stephen Cambone, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, and White House General Counsel Alberto Gonzales.

    It would be the final irony of this matter to have a person like Lynndie England be central to the process of bringing the true barbarians in this horror show to justice. It would be the final irony of this matter to have this woman, who tortured her fellow human beings with a smile on her face, be instrumental in bringing about the final and long-overdue death of the Nuremberg Defense.

 


    William Rivers Pitt is the senior editor and lead writer for t r u t h o u t. He is a New York Times and international bestselling author of two books - 'War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know' and 'The Greatest Sedition is Silence.'

 

  ______

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Burning_the_Reichstag

Bushkevik

Burning the Reichstag

 

On the 27. February in 1933, one month after Adolf Hitler was declared Reichskanzler, the Reichstags-building in Berlin was burning.

The Burning Reichstag Newspaper - Reichstag's burning
When the police arrived they found Marinus van der Lubbe on the premises.
After being tortured by the Gestapo he confessed to starting the Reichstag Fire.
However he denies that he was part of a Communist conspiracy.
Hermann Goering refused to believe him and he ordered the arrest of several leaders of the German Communist Party (KPD).

When Hitler heard the news about the fire he gave orders that all leaders of the German Communist Party should "be hanged that very night."
Paul von Hindenburg vetoed this decision but did agree that Hitler should take "dictatorial powers". KPD candidates in the election were arrested and Hermann Goering announced that the Nazi Party planned "to exterminate" German communists.
Communists burned the Reichstag!

 

As well as Marinus van der Lubbe the German police charged four communists with setting fire to the Reichstag. This included Ernst Torgler, the chairman of the KPD and Georgi Dimitrov of the Soviet Comintern.

Marinus van der Lubbe was found guilty of the Reichstag Fire and was executed on 10th January, 1934. Adolf Hitler was furious he rest of the defendants were acquitted and he decided that in future all treason cases were taken from the Supreme Court and given to a new People's Court where prisoners were judged by members of the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP).

The burning of the Reichstag was very useful for the German Government. On the 28. of February, the Reichstagsbrandverordnung (similiar to Patriot Act) was set in power.

This Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of the People and State abrogates the following constitutional protections.

A supplemental decree creates the SA (Storm Troops) and SS (Special Security) Federal police agencies.

ANALYSIS

The events in 1933 can be summarized as follows:

 

_____

Just like the Bushkevik's in the whorehouse of zion for an obedient Goy Nation. tsk tsk shem's, your shame proceeds you and was demised at Calvary....who told you to flee the wrath to come?

Post-9/11 laws expand to more than terrorism

By LANCE GAY
June 14, 2004

Federal and state prosecutors are applying stiff antiterrorism laws adopted after the 9/11 attacks to broad, run-of-the-mill probes of political corruption, financial crimes and immigration frauds.

If the government gets its way, even routine transactions of buying or selling American homes could soon come under the scrutiny of money-laundering provisions of the USA Patriot Act. The Treasury Department, which already has caught up financial transactions in casinos, storefront check-cashing stores and auto dealers for scrutiny, wants to expand Patriot Act coverage to home purchases as well.

Since 9/11, critics say the greatest effect of new state and federal antiterrorism laws has been on crimes already covered by other laws.

Washington-area snipers John Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo were both convicted under a post-9/11 Virginia antiterrorism statute making it a death-penalty offense to be involved in more than one murder in a three-year period. Muhammad was sentenced to death, and Malvo was given life imprisonment without parole.

The FBI has used Patriot Act provisions in a political corruption probe involving a Las Vegas girlie bar, and the Justice Department reported to the House Judiciary Committee last year that it used the new law in probes of credit-card fraud, theft from a bank account and a kidnapping.

In the first action of its kind, the Treasury Department also used the Patriot Act this year to put Syria's largest commercial bank and two commercial banks in Myanmar on blacklists - actions that forbid any U.S. financial institution from doing business with them.

Legal experts say they're not surprised that antiterrorism laws are being used for more than just terrorism.

Peter Swire, a law professor at Ohio State University, recalled that Congress adopted antiracketeering laws in 1970 with the intent to thwart mobsters, but the punitive laws have since been broadened and put to use in civil cases against corporations, and most recently against the organized campaigns of pro-life protesters against abortion clinics.

Swire worked in the Clinton administration and chaired a White House working group looking at issues involved with electronic surveillance. He said many Patriot Act provisions, which sped through Congress within days after 9/11, were proposals that either Congress or the White House had previously rejected. Many provisions are slated to expire next year unless Congress makes the changes permanent.

Swire said one little-noted impact of that law on the judicial system is that prosecutors can add more charges against defendants, even when terrorism isn't involved.

"Prosecutors like to have more arrows in their quiver - it gives them more leverage in plea bargaining," he said. Plea bargaining is the process where prosecutors offer to drop some charges in return for a defendant's guilty plea in order to avoid costly, time-consuming trials.

Swire contends the Patriot Act has been so controversial that the Justice Department has been very cautious in using all of its provisions.

"They are careful because they know people are checking to see if it is abused," he said. "Once it becomes permanent, I think it will be used more widely."

The American Civil Liberties Union and other civil rights groups are campaigning for Congress to terminate some of the more controversial provisions of the Patriot Act, contending the law unnecessarily expands government powers.

The ACLU says the government already has sufficient investigative tools, and the Patriot Act has been used for non-terrorist-related crimes such as seizing stolen funds from bank accounts in Belize.

Michael Mello, a law professor at Vermont Law School, disagrees and said the Patriot Act made some needed changes in government procedures, including provisions that tore down barriers that prohibited the FBI and CIA from sharing information.

"There's been a sea change by tearing down that wall," said Mello. "To forbid the FBI from getting spooks' (CIA) information that someone in the United States was carrying out a significant criminal enterprise is insane."

In spite of the criticism from the ACLU and others, Mello said he doesn't believe the Patriot Act has been misused or has resulted in any expansion of government powers. "In the absence of evidence, the critics lose," he said.

Mello agrees that there are some provisions in the Patriot Act that should be allowed to expire. He opposes a controversial provision allowing the Justice Department to use so-called "national security letters" to obtain library records, medical records and banking records of people put under surveillance. The Patriot Act wasn't needed when police searched library records in the hunt for Unabomber Ted Kaczynski or the effort to track New York's Zodiac killer, Mello noted.

Many government activities under the Patriot Act remain shrouded in secrecy. One of the provisions not expiring is an expansion of police powers to obtain "sneak-and-peek" warrants allowing surveillances - including break-ins - without notifying the people being watched.

The government is being more aggressive in asking courts for surveillance warrants. The Justice Department last year made a record 1,727 requests for wiretap approvals from the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, but does not publicly disclose how many investigations that might involve.

Attorney General John Ashcroft told the Senate Judiciary Committee last week that the Patriot Act has been used judiciously, and he urged Congress to give speedy consideration to extending it.

______

93% Of All US Navy
Ships Said At Sea - Why?
A Little Puzzle In Logic

Half Past Human.com
6-14-4
 
If the navies of the world were putting to sea en masse - and they are (10 carrier groups out from US alone - 93 per cent of ALL US naval ships are at sea - official stats)....
 
And if the Federal Reserve Bank was force-feeding liquidity into the system at rates that exceeded the post-911 period, then a few reasonably sound deductions might be made of this....
 
But first, some assumptions:
 
1) Navies put to sea when they expect severe weather.
 
2) It is very expensive to keep navies at sea for any length of time, and the poorer the country, the shorter the time possible.
 
3) Navies do *not* put to sea en masse for war, especially nuclear war (think about it, the task forces are easy to find. Lob in a nuclear warhead and, voila: no more task force (and no 'collateral
damages or radioactive real estate).
 
4) The Fed forcing money into the system has a short term, limited effect - likely on the order of less than 2 month's cycle time (money velocity through the system).
 
Therefore, our deductions might be as follows:
 
a) Since many of the most powerful nations have sent their naval forces to sea, then whatever the reason for it, it not likely to be a political one.
 
b) Because so many navies are at sea, it seems logical that the powers that be suspect something of a global dimension to occur that would adversely affect ships if there were in port. This argues for both global impact, and climatic/environmental dynamic, as no purely political/social event would affect all navies planet-wide.
 
c) Since navies can only mill-about so long on the water, especially en masse, the 'whatever' is a short-term expectation.
 
d) Since the effects of the Fed liquidity explosion are going to go through the monetary system like heroin through an addict, that is, one short term 'rush' and then withdrawal leading to very shakey behavior, the 'whatever' that the Fed is preparing for is, also likely, a short-term expectation.
 
Of course the definition of 'short-term' could vary, but it would seem safe to assume that the US Navy won't be at sea for months. Perhaps a good definition would be that of a month. And some sort of global navy affecting event may or may not occur.
 
This may suggest the Aussie Bloke stuff, but, today, a single large earthquake in Antarctica rattled the world, setting off a series of quakes along many parts of the Pacific Rim. So, if the navies of the world were expecting something to occur, and thought to be better safe than sorry, they might put,
indeed, put to sea.
 
Since we have two, verified, observable occurances, i.e. navies out to sea, and Fed pumping money like never before in history, we have a logic puzzle. Neither of the observable events makes sense within the context of today's world, unless there is something wicked this way coming.....or thought to be by those we pay to know.
 
Refutations invited, please.
 
http://www.halfpasthuman.com
Do you need me to tell you why?

___________

The Great Sheinerman Pull-out

want some ocean front property on Phoebe

Israel Confiscates Swaths of West Bank


Monday June 14, 2004 6:46 PM

 

AP Photo JRL102

By MARK LAVIE

Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel has expropriated thousands of acres of Palestinian farmland deep in the West Bank for the most controversial segment of its separation barrier, Palestinian officials said Monday.

The WALL and the Military Street.....Daniel 9

The military, meanwhile, said it is taking down a few of the roadblocks that have disrupted West Bank life for more than three years - though the main obstacles to Palestinian travel remain in place.

Israel began building the barrier last year, (June 19, 2003 to November 2004......62 weeks) to keep out Palestinian militants who have killed hundreds of Israelis since the outbreak of fighting in 2000.(to Lock in the shem's) In some areas, the trenches, walls and fences run near Israel's old frontier with the West Bank, but elsewhere dip deep into the territory claimed by the Palestinians for a future state.

hahahhahahahahhah a future Obedient Goyim Universal Noahide Prison

The latest land seizures are part of construction of a barrier segment near the Israeli settlement of Ariel, in the heart of the West Bank.

Palestinians charge that the barrier project is meant to swallow up large parts of the West Bank, pointing to the Ariel sector as a prime example.

If Israel builds the barrier to include Ariel on the ``Israeli'' side, it would mean cutting a wedge halfway through the northern part of the territory, because Ariel is in the middle.

With 18,000 residents, Ariel is the second-largest West Bank settlement. Maale Adumim, east of Jerusalem, has 26,000.

The United States is opposed to adding Ariel to Israel by means of the barrier, and Israel has so far avoided making a clear decision.

Asaf Shariv, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's spokesman, said that for now only an east-west section of the barrier is being built, leaving the option of encircling Ariel separately - a concept the Americans apparently do not oppose.

Amarakan's of the Judeo Churchizionist persuasion

A U.S. official said there are ongoing consultations about the Ariel issue.

of course on the condition of anonymity

The Ariel barrier project is already causing hardships for Palestinians.

Nooooooooooo!

Residents of the nearby Palestinian village of Azawiya were informed that 4,500 acres of land are being expropriated for a 2-mile stretch of barrier, said Annan Elashkar, a Palestinian liaison officer with Israel.

Azawiya resident Khader Abdel Raouf, 65, said he had his 32 acres of olive groves seized.

Abdel Raouf said his family of 15 lives off the olive oil produced by the trees. ``I have been planting and harvesting these olives since I was a small boy,'' Abdel Raouf said in tears. ``This land belongs to me and I belong to it.''

Not anymore....it belongs to the shem gods

Palestinian Cabinet minister Saeb Erekat said building a barrier around Ariel would ``mean the destruction and devastation of the road map,'' an internationally backed peace plan for a Palestinian state next year, because of the confiscation of Palestinian land.

hahahahhheeeeeeeeehoooooooooooooooo hoodlum hahahahahahahahahaha

For months, Palestinians and their supporters have been demonstrating at many construction sites along the length of the barrier, making similar complaints. Thousands of acres of land have been confiscated for the barrier.

so what....in the name of Judeo Jaysooooooooooose.....keel em all say the Hagee's of Bushkevik's Amaraka

Despite the tension, the military began easing restrictions in the West Bank by starting to remove about 40 ramparts and gates that blocked West Bank roads, a defense official said on condition of anonymity.

The official said obstacles can be lifted in areas where the barrier has been completed. The military released a statement saying the easing is in keeping with its policy to ``to make a clear distinction between the terrorists who hide among civilians and those not involved in terror.''

You can tell them by the way they hold their mouth

Shortly after violence erupted in September 2000, Israeli forces erected dozens of roadblocks in the West Bank, choking travel.

The violence errupted in July 2001 at the hand of Arik Sheinerman....Winston

Israel said the restrictions were necessary to stop Palestinian attacks, but Palestinians charged they were part of a plan to ruin their economy and force them to surrender.

Become obedient Noahide's of the shem god's

In the Israeli parliament, meanwhile, Sharon's government survived three motions of no confidence when the opposition Labor Party abstained.

So what Bushkevik has survived millions of votes of Non Competence

Sharon lost his parliamentary majority while ramming a plan to pull out of Gaza through his Cabinet. Labor has pledged to give him a ``safety net'' in parliament votes as a gesture of support for the Gaza plan.

ocean front property....any one?

Also Monday, Palestinian Foreign Minister Nabil Shaath said Yasser Arafat is considering bringing militant groups into the Palestinian Authority's security forces as part of a reform program.

Arafat has offered members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a group with ties to his Fatah movement, to join the official forces, while the Islamic militant group Hamas has ``asked for a role within the security institutions,'' Shaath said.

However, a leader of the militant Islamic Jihad on Monday criticized efforts to reform the Palestinian security forces, indicating it would not cooperate.

______

 

Noahide News Part 16

 

 

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II

"Questions"

"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

 ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7 Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees

Exod-U.S the coming Geula 

anti-semitism?

Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of
 Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

Noahide News Part 3

Noahide News Part 4

Noahide News Part 5

Noahide News Part 6

Noahide News Part 7

Noahide News Part 8

Noahide News Part 9

Noahide News Part 10

Noahide News Part 11

Noahide News Part 12

Noahide News Part 13

Noahide News Part 14

Noahide News Part 15

Noahide News Part 16