March 28, 2005
Day127 of 1290 of 2300
of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.
Yes there will be war. The Sanhedrin of the sons of the shemagog have declared it upon all mankind who do not submit to their global rule with their coming false Christ, Moshiach at the helm. It is brewing. By the Disengagement in June-July, Danbushkevik must create even more chaos in the middle east. Iran and Syria will be taken to restore their Babylonian territories of whoredoms. The US will be under enforcement of the Noahide Laws. Terri Schiavo was only a first, ruled by the Freemason Noahide Courts. Time is rapidly approaching. The roobers are attacking secular Judah, to set the seventy ancients upon their thrones, along with their mere man king despot of all the apostate earth. It is not playing out as seen on countless Judeao Churchian movies of sensational draconian enday drama. But is a smoothed tongued beast, crept in and un-noticed by the masses and upon them in their complacent apostasy. It is so deceiving that if it were not for the sake of the elect there will be no flesh left. Are you prepared? Are you standing firm in the testimony of the LORD God and His Father, and the WORD of God?
Do you hear in Judea?
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/557471.htmlLast Update: 28/03/2005 17:07
Knesset votes down bill calling for pullout referendum
By Gideon Alon, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service
The Knesset plenum on Monday afternoon rejected the bill on the disengagement referendum by a vote of 72 to 39.
There were three abstentions and three MKs were
not present in the plenum during the vote.
Ministers Benjamin Netanyahu, Limor Livnat and Silvan Shalom voted for the referendum while many of the Shas MKs, who stayed outside the plenum during the initial round of voting, eventually returned and voted against the bill.
United Torah Judaism MKs abstained together with Shinui members Eliezer Sandberg and Hemi Doron.
Earlier in the day, settler leaders, fearing the defeat of the bill, asked that it be removed from the Knesset agenda, but Likud MK Michael Eitan, who has spearheaded efforts to pass the plebiscite bill, said the vote would go forward.
The anti-disengagement right has viewed the referendum as potentially the most potent weapon in foiling the pullout. The request to remove the vote from the agenda may have been intended to allow the right to reintroduce the referendum bill at a later date when they believe they have a majority.
Eitan, chairman of the Knesset's Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, rejected the Monday morning request by settler leaders who feared they won't have a majority in the first vote in the Knesset plenum.
"There is no point in canceling the vote, and the public deserve to know the political balance of power on this issue," Eitan told Haaretz on Sunday night.
The defeated bill will not be subject to Knesset rules that stipulate that when the Knesset votes down a private-member bill, it cannot be raised again for six months, Eitan said.
"This provision does not apply to bills initiated by a Knesset committee, and in this instance, the law proposal is the initiative of the Constitution Committee," he said.
Just prior to the Monday afternoon Knesset vote on the referendum bill, Eitan verbally attacked the behavior of Shas spiritual leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. "It is painful to me that a figure so widely admired by sectors of Israel's population, the honorable Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, has engaged in accounting like any politician," Eitan said.
Landau lobbies Yosef in last-ditch referendum move
In a last-ditch effort to hobble the disengagement, MK Uzi Landau, leader of the anti-pullout Likud "rebels," had appealed earlier Monday to Rabbi Yosef to order the ultra-Orthodox party to support the referendum in the Knesset vote.
In order to pass, the bill needed the Shas votes, as well as some 30 votes from Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Likud. The "rebels," or "loyalists," as they refer to themselves, failed to sway large number of Likud comrades into voting in favor.
The referendum issue also came up during Sunday's cabinet meeting, where Vice Premier Shimon Peres said that the Labor Party will quit the government immediately if the bill is approved. "I want to inform the cabinet that a referendum is a basic law. To vote in favor of it is a gross violation (of the coalition agreement)," the party's Minister without Portfolio Haim Ramon said at the meeting
Declaration Concerning the Disengagement
Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / 27 Adar 5765
The reestablished Sanhedrin has concluded extensive deliberations on the disengagement plan, rejecting it as a contradiction to the Torah of Israel.
The current format of the Sanhedrin is the renewal of the historic Sanhedrin, Judaism's highest legal-religious tribunal during Holy Temple times.
see the abominations the seventy ancients do in the House of the Lord Ezehiel....Ezek. 8
The 71-man assembly convened in one of the Holy Temple chambers, and existed from several decades before the Common Era until roughly 425 C.E. The renewed body was launched last year in Tiberias, and convenes in Jerusalem.
Following an intensive study and debate on the issue and its halakhic [Jewish legal] implications, the Sanhedrin drafted a declaration Monday, stating inter alia:
* The disengagement plan, involving the uprooting of Jewish communities in Gaza and Samaria and the abandonment of these areas to a foreign entity, is in direct contradiction to the Torah of Israel, and is null and void. Future governments of Israel will have to re-conquer the areas in question.
Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. ... Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha.... (Talmud Bavli, Decapitation) .... And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. —Committee for Israeli Victory
* The decision to implement the uprooting will cause large numbers of Jews to transgress many of the Torah's (Talmud Bavli, Mishnah Torah) commandments.
* The Government of Israel and the Knesset, in their present form and power structure, are institutions that have no authority according to Jewish Law to render decisions that contradict the Torah (Talmud of satan) of Israel.
* No Jew is permitted to cooperate with the program of uprooting, in any way whatsoever.
* Any Jew – including a soldier or policeman – who supports the uprooting, whether directly or indirectly, whether by voting in its favor, or by giving counsel, or by supplying vehicles or materials, and certainly anyone who actively participates in the uprooting, thus transgresses a large number of Torah commandments, such as not standing idly by one's neighbor's blood
* The uprooting of the residents of the Gaza Strip and Samaria is a crime
and an injustice to the residents, and places many other
communities – in fact, all citizens of the State of Israel – in mortal
* By this declaration, the Sanhedrin, as the link of continuity of the Torah received by Moses at Sinai,
Oral traditions at the Valley of Sin
hereby expresses the stance of Israel's Torah... The Sanhedrin, as the representative of the Jewish people throughout history, hereby affirms that the Jewish people -- regardless of this or that government -- does not relinquish, and is not entitled to relinquish, so much as the span of a solitary man's foot of the Land of Israel according to its Biblical boundaries, for it is G-d's land.
their god of their flesh world
14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
Sanhedrin the beast out of the seas,REV.13
1: And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a
beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten hornsand upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2: And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
3: And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
4: And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
5: And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
6: And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
7: And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
Remember Baruch Goldstein
Early on the morning of Purim 1994, when the Israel Defense Forces were busy making their final preparations for withdrawing from Gaza and Jericho under the Oslo Accords, Baruch Goldstein decided to do something to shuffle the deck and stop the withdrawal: He fired into a crowd of Muslim worshipers in the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron, killing 29 Palestinians.
the Hassidim of Dan's Chabad Lubavitch of Sanhedrin will not allow Sharon to withdraw......war in ISREALHELL will be War worldwide, ending at Megiddo
In his testimony in court, Yigal Amir said that the idea of killing the prime minister first entered his head when he attended Goldstein's funeral and saw Goldstein's hundreds of admirers.
At the time, the government declined to listen
to then-attorney general Michael Ben-Yair's recommendation that it immediately
evacuate all the settlers from Hebron, thereby demonstrating uncompromising
Since then, the extremist camp has grown, and today, its members number in the thousands. It is currently girding up its loins to stop the disengagement - and once again, we are witnessing intensive violent activity whose goal is to fan the flames of hatred between Arabs and Jews. Now, as then, preparations for the disengagement are being accompanied by daily
Drunk with the cup of
whoredom of Hassidic Pharisee, Talmud Bavli
It is inconceivable that no lessons have been learned - that the army and police are once again waiting for a commission of inquiry to describe after the fact what could have been prevented in advance. The job of the IDF, which is responsible for security in the territories, is not to describe the violence and warn against it, but to prevent it. The Purim rampage by Yitzhar residents was not exceptional; it followed seven other incidents that had been extensively reported in the media during the previous week.
Had it not been for the presence of human rights activists in the area, it is doubtful that the public would even know about what happened. These activists brought about the arrest of Avri Ran of Itamar; they are also the ones who reported the poisoning of livestock in the South Hebron Hills. The settlers, for their part, attacked the soldiers and policemen who came to arrest them and ultimately succeeded in chasing them off.
While the army debates the correct way to treat the settlers, and settler spokesmen exploit feelings of pity to cry about collective delegitimization, the next massacre is brewing almost openly. The principal lesson that should have been learned from Baruch Goldstein - who, like Yigal Amir, was no "wild weed," but rather someone who acted with the support and encouragement of many - is that there is no place for understanding and tolerance on this issue: The rioters belong in jail.
and all they who control
Dan Bushkeviks hassidic Chabad WhiteHouse
This is even truer when it is clear to everyone that the rioters are attempting to ignite a fire as the evacuation of settlements approaches. This is almost the last possible moment for action by IDF officers in the territories, who last week reported feelings of helplessness in their ranks. One can assume that stronger political backing would produce results. But attempts to ingratiate themselves with the right, and statements such as that of Major General Yair Naveh about the need to embrace the settlers, will lead to disaste
Noahide Demonicrazy of satan's shemagog-ue
and Dan Bushkevik of Chabad Lubavitch
Last Update: 28/03/2005 17:48
Yesha Council: PM has blocked chance to prevent civil war
By Haaretz Service and Itim
The anti-disengagement camp(Hassidim Chabad Lubavitch, Sanhedrin) slammed the Knesset's Monday afternoon rejection of the disengagement referendum bill.
The Knesset plenum on Monday afternoon rejected
the bill on the disengagement referendum by a vote of 72 to 39.
Following the vote, the council of settler leaders announced it would focus its struggle against the pullout into actions in the field.
all out war....WWIII in the Middle East Noahide takeover
The Council of Jewish Settlements of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza District, also known as the Yesha Council, said it intends to act together with more than 100,000 activists in Gush Katif and the northern West Bank in efforts to prevent the pullout.
"In a destructive manner, the prime minister blocked today the chance to bring the disengagement plan to a vote by the people and thus prevent a civil war," the Yesha Council said in a statement.
'We are full of hope that a steadfast public struggle will, in the end, decide the struggle over our home," the council said.
Yesha Council Chairman Bentzi Lieberman told Army Radio on Monday afternoon that "from our standpoint there will not be violence of any sort."
However, Lieberman warned that what he described as the Knesset's "undemocratic decision" might well lead some fringe anti-pullout activists to make use of violent tactics in their protests against the disengagement.
"We greatly fear this. We warned that this might happen," he said and noted that such fringe groups have had their numbers boosted by Monday's Knesset decision.
National Religious Party MK Effi Eitam said "hundreds of thousands of citizens, who have been prevented from exercising their right to vote in a national referendum or in elections on the disengagement plan, will vote with their feet in Gush Katif in a democratic and non-violent fashion. They will prove that the majority of the nation opposes disengagement."
Eitam said the Knesset voted against the people and against democracy
The James the Just Freemason Noahide Conference against the "Dis-engagement
Jerusalem Conference: How The Disengagement
16:09 Mar 28, '05 / 17 Adar 5765
Meron, a leading lawyer on the volunteer Land of Israel Lawyers Forum, spoke
today at the Jerusalem
Conference on the ways in which the disengagement plan
blatantly harms the civil rights of the residents to be uprooted.
"Israel stands on two legs," Meron said, "as the Declaration of Independence defines it as a Jewish and democratic (Noahide Demonicrazy) state. The Jewish aspects are hardly ever discussed... But we are here to discuss the democratic aspects, or at least one of them. I will not discuss the breach of trust by elected officials, for instance, but rather the harm done to civil rights.
"It is fundamental that a democracy operates under the assumption of consent by the minority to follow the will of the majority. However, this is is only with the condition that the majority not oppress the minority - or at least, if it must do so, it must do so in a proportionate manner. For instance, ten starving passengers on a raft may not vote 9-1 to eat the tenth... No matter what name this plan goes by, it is nothing more than 'internal displacement,' involving an impairment of freedom of movement, religion, assembly and right to property."
"However, as bad as all that is, it is still not the main danger. Above all is the fact that this plan will leave many people psychologically crippled. We know this from our experience in Sinai in 1982. Between 15 and 25% of those to be uprooted from their homes will end up having to go to the National Insurance Institute and request 'handicapped' status. This means between 1,000 and 2,000 people!"
"We're talking about problems such as divorce, suicide, early death due to broken heart, leaving the country , and emotional difficulties."
"How can these numbers be reduced? The government must be generous in time, money, and empathy. Some experts have recommended that there be some sort of ideological compensation [such as annexation of certain parts of Yesha, or the like]. But instead, as it has done throughout this plan, the government takes the exact opposite track - giving us reports of how soldiers are training to conquer Gush Katif strongholds, and how jails are being built to hold hundreds or thousands of disengagement opponents..."
"The first thing that should have been done, and should be done, is to find places to relocate entire communities. But for almost a year since Sharon first announced this plan, the government did absolutely nothing in this regard. Only this past November, did it begin thinking about it - but what did it offer? Halutza, Negev, Galilee - things that are totally not appropriate to the agriculture of Gush Katif... We recommended the Nitzanim area between Ashkelon and Ashdod, and the government refused. Only recently has it begun considering this seriously – with no chance that anything will be ready in time, even if it works out...
DO YOU HEAR in JUDEA ?
“The government must prepare the new sites in advance. Instead, what is happening is that the government is preparing to uproot the people twice – first to the temporary home, and then two years from now, or whenever the new homes are ready, to the new place. All experts agree that the damage to children under such circumstances is much worse...”
“We, in the lawyers' forum,(scribes of the Pharisees) found 40 different injustices that are being done to the residents. In the brief time allotted to me, I can only mention some of them: the fact that almost every single person will end up poorer than he is now... Some of them will end up much poorer. There is no compensation for a host of things, such as the harvests they are missing now, and possible claims by foreign importers, and for loss of reputation, and even for part of their property...”
The schedule of the Jerusalem Conference, which will take place through Wednesday, can be viewed by clicking here.
Did you hear the joke about the rib-eye, priest, and the moslem ?
Top Rabbi, Catholic Bishop, Anglican and Muslim Leaders Agree Tsunami Is Warning From God
"There will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth dismay
among nations, in perplexity at the roaring of the sea and the waves..." -
Luke 21:25 NASB
(LifeSiteNews.com) The recent catastrophe in Southeast Asia has led many to reflect on the shortness and instability of mortal life and turn their thoughts towards God. In the wake of the tsunami, religious leaders from various faith backgrounds have urged people to look at the disaster as a warning sign to a world which is far from God's ways.
Israel's Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar commented on the catastrophe last week saying "G-d is angry" and "we must pray more and ask for mercy." In comments to the Ynet website, he said: "The nations of the world are obligated to observe the seven Noahide laws, such as prohibitions against murder and illicit (sexual) relations... The deaths are very painful."
The Catholic Bishop of Port Blair in the Andaman Islands of India, Alex Dias, told the media, "I believe that the tsunami is a warning. A warning from God to reflect deeply on the way we lead our lives." The Bishop who is leading the main relief effort in the area continued, "We are too hurried today. We are rushing here, rushing there. Everything is a façade. There are lots of cracks and undulating things in our lives. A disaster like this is a word from God to think about those cracks and smoothen them out. We are filling our lives with so much that there is little place for God." He concluded, "In moments of grave crisis, we remember God and we should also think how to put him back in the primary position in our lives."
Chief executive of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, Amjad Mehboob, also spoke to the media about the tragedy as a warning from the Almighty. In comments to AAP he said: "It's a test - he wants to see how we react to this. If we react with compassion, our hearts are filled and we do something about it, then that act in itself is something God is wanting to see in us. We turn to God, we become God-conscious and when we become God-conscious we do good and not bad, we seek good in others."
then murder terri Schiavo, then the saints of
Jesus the Christ by their satanic Noahide Laws of their Sanhedrin of the sons of
the shemagogue of satan
The Anglican Dean of Sydney, Phillip Jensen, said the disasters were a warning from God that judgment was imminent. The statement was backed by South Sydney Anglican Bishop Robert Forsyth who said Jesus Christ used the example of disasters to bring people to God. "Without explaining the disaster, even Jesus drew peoples' attention to let the disasters be a warning to them of their own mortality and their need to be right with God," Bishop Forsyth said. "So at this point the Dean's point is echoing the point of Jesus."
In the name of Jesus the Christ the IMHE, they deliver
you to satan and their Moshaich ben satan that son of perdition of the
sanhedrins Hooldlum hoo haha
In the Gospel of Luke, chapter 13, Jesus himself spoke of a disaster, noting that those who perished were not more evil than others, but that it was a warning for all to repent. "Or those eighteen upon whom the tower fell in Siloe, and slew them: think you, that they also were debtors above all the men that dwelt in Jerusalem? No, I say to you; but except you do penance, you shall all likewise perish," said Christ
and they crucified the LORD and call him and Idol, now they attempt to snare his saints and his elect.
the shemgods warning the goyim animal nations again?
Tsunami Sol-Tice DEC. 26 2004
Now Tsunami the day after Astarte, March 28, 2005
Shembolism and Tesla
promoting Noahidsm to the Dragon
It struck just before midnight local time, with an estimated magnitude of 8.2, and caused widespread panic.
There were unconfirmed reports of casualties from the tremor as people left coastal areas of Sumatra.
Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand and India are also on alert after forecasts of a "widely destructive tsunami".
The quake struck between the Sumatran cities of Padang and Medan at around 2315 local time (1615 GMT) and lasted up to three minutes, according to Indonesia's Meteorological and Geophysics Office.
Its epicentre was located at about 200km (125 miles) off the Sumatran mainland.
Most people were in bed at the time and there were no immediate reports of damage, says the BBC's Tim Johnstone in the Indonesian capital, Jakarta.
Reports from Banda Aceh say thousands came out into the streets, fearful of collapsing houses, while an official quoted by Reuters news agency spoke of "dozens" killed on the island of Nias.
Communications were swamped, although some mobile phone messages were getting through.
'I heard my neighbours screaming'
The 26 December tsunami caused major damage and killed tens of thousands of people in states across the region.
Russ Evans, a seismologist from the British Geological Survey, told the BBC that Monday's tremor quake was almost certainly an after-shock of the earlier quake, which had a magnitude of 9.
A new tsunami was certainly possible, he said, but on a smaller scale.
The quake was felt across the region with people in the Malaysian capital, Kuala Lumpur, some 500km away, evacuating high-rise buildings and running out into the streets.
"I was getting ready for bed, and suddenly, the room started shaking," said Kuala Lumpur resident Jessie Chong.
"I thought I was hallucinating at first, but then I heard my neighbours screaming and running out."
Thailand and India, badly hit by the 26 December disaster, issued tsunami alerts while Sri Lanka evacuated coastal areas
Dozens of Goyim already slain
Dozens Reported Dead in
Indonesia After Quake
JAKARTA (Reuters) - A massive earthquake killed dozens of people and destroyed hundreds of homes in the main town on Indonesia's Nias (Nasi?) island Monday evening, a local government official told Metro TV.
"I can guarantee that dozens have died," Agus Mendrofa, the deputy mayor of Gunungsitoli town, said.
The massive 8.2 magnitude quake struck off the coast of Sumatra Monday close to where a quake triggered a tsunami that left nearly 300,000 people dead or missing across Asia, residents and officials said.
The latest quake had the potential to cause a "widely destructive tsunami" and authorities should take "immediate action," including evacuating coastlines within 600 miles of the epicenter, the Pacific tsunami warning center said.
One official said any possible tsunami could be headed toward the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius.
Indonesia's Metro TV quoted a resident on the island of Nias, off western Sumatra, as saying buildings there were damaged.
"Things are quite bad right now," the resident said. "There is much damage. People are running in panic. Many people are also trapped."
He did not elaborate on what he meant by people were "trapped."
Tens of thousands of people across northern and western Sumatra fled their homes and drove or ran to higher ground, TV and residents said.
Thailand urged people living along parts of its west coast, including tourists on the resort island of Phuket, to evacuate while Malaysia issued a warning to coastal residents.
"About 3,000 to 4,000 tourists and locals have been evacuated from Patong and Kamala beaches to higher places," Phuket deputy governor Wichai Buapradit told Reuters.
"We've told them to take their valuable belongings and to go to higher places," he added.
Authorities in India's Andaman and Nicobar islands, north of the epicenter, issued a preliminary tsunami warning as did the federal government in New Delhi. Sirens were ringing in the eastern Sri Lankan town of Trincomalee and many coastal areas were evacuated, residents said.
NO REPORTS OF TSUNAMI
Indonesia's information minister said there were no reports of a tsunami along the coast.
"There is no report of any damage," the Andaman and Nicobar islands' Lieutenant-Governor Ram Kapse told Reuters by telephone. "We have issued an initial warning. If there is any problem, we will evacuate."
A spokesman for the U.S. Geological Survey told Reuters the quake struck 125 miles west northwest of Sibolga, Sumatra or 880 miles northwest of the Indonesian capital of Jakarta at 1609 GMT, close to where the 9.0 magnitude quake struck in December.
It was felt as far away as Singapore and the Malaysian coastal city of Penang, jolting people out of their beds just past midnight.
"It felt stronger than on Dec. 26," said Arumugam Gopal, a resident of Penang.
A telephone operator in the Sumatran city of Medan said: "It was very strong. We all ran out of the building."
An NGO official in Banda Aceh, the town worst hit by the Dec. 26 tsunami, sent out a telephone message saying thousands of people fled their homes and headed for higher ground after feeling what he described as "a very damn big earthquake."
U.S. Geological Survey spokesman Don Blakeman said Monday's quake was considered a "great earthquake" because it was larger than a magnitude 8. He said it was an aftershock from December's temblor but was a "very serious earthquake in its own right."
But the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said the quake had the "potential to generate a widely destructive tsunami in the ocean or seas near the earthquake."
"Authorities can assume the danger has passed if no tsunami waves are observed in the region near the epicenter within three hours of the earthquake," it added
. Who is going to verify what is taught in the village schools? But what an envoy of the government or a king on his throne himself may say cannot but become immediately known to the whole State, for it will be spread abroad by the voice of the people.
INVOLUNTARY PARTICULARISM: WHAT THE NOAHIDE LAWS TELL US ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AND ALIENAGE Gidon Rothstein
Updated June 1, 2001
Copyright© 1997-present by English Works! at Gallaudet University, Washington, D.C.
Salvation and Conversion. You do not have to be a Jew to attain your rewards in the hereafter. Jews are required to fulfill a wide range of commandments (613 in fact) in addition to the first ten. Non-Jews are only required to observe the seven Noahide Laws from Genesis 8. These include avoiding the following:
Faculty Focus is a monthly publication documenting the activities, accomplishments, and honors of the University of Houston Law Center Faculty.
Irene Merker Rosenberg is giving a lecture on the admissibility of confessions under American and Jewish law. The talk is part of a lecture series on American and Jewish law sponsored by TORCH. Attendees will receive 1 CLE ethics credit. It will be held on Tuesday, March 15th, 11:45am-1:00p.m. at Vinson & Elkins, 2300 First City Tower 1001 Fannin, Conference Room 27 East. The cost is $20. To R.S.V.P. call 713-721-6400
Ext. 105. A kosher lunch will be provided. Professor Rosenberg is also giving a talk to high school students on the differences between American and Jewish Law. Professor Rosenberg’s article entitled The Seven Noahide Laws: Of Monkey Brains and Courts was published by Rutgers J. L. & Religion. It is also available at www.lawandreligion.com
The Seven Laws of Noah
and Related Concepts
The articles, information, and links provided on this site do not represent official policies, procedures, or opinions of Auburn University or any of its operational units. The information on this site have come from a variety of sources, including speeches, articles, tracts, and other presentations, and they have been composed over a period of time, and many are of historic interest. Also, writer's inclusion on this site does not imply his full agreement with all of the articles. Each writer is responsible only for his own stated views. Many of the articles on this web site have been included only for the viewers use in the comparison of differing views and beliefs.
Frimer, D.I, "Israel, the Noahide Laws and Maimonides: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Maimonidean Thought", in B.S. Jackson, ed., The Jerusalem Conference Volume (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986: Jewish Law Association Studies, II), 89-102 (Blue 4, 349.33/J5)
Institute for Judaism and Civilization
Our focus is on the relationships of Judaism with the arts, sciences, and values of general civilization, and the study of the universal morality expounded in the Noahide laws.
There is unfortunately in the Jewish world outside and inside the State of Israel a good deal of estrangement between "religious" and "nonreligious", between the languages of secular culture and science and traditional learning. Yet the essential oneness of the Jewish people and the sense of the ultimate oneness of humanity - reveals this as abnormal, as nonnormative. The Institute for Judaism and Civilization, under the direction of Rabbi Dr Shimon Cowen, addresses this problem.
The Institute has sought to establish a serious discourse between Jewish tradition and (Jewish practitioners of) the arts, sciences, and professions of general society. So far the Institute has established ongoing seminar series in "Judaism and Psychotherapy", "Judaism and the Arts", "Judaism, law and public policy" and "Judaism and Medicine". There is also a group, which explores the relationship between Judaism and the gentile world through the Noahide laws, given in Torah to the descendants of Noah general humanity. The Institute's journal, The Journal of Judaism and Civilization, of which the first volume has appeared, publishes proceedings of these seminars.
The Director of the Institute for Judaism and Civilization, Rabbi Dr Shimon Cowen, has a dual background in secular and religious studies. He received a PhD in social philosophy from Monash University, Melbourne and rabbinic ordination (s'micha) both in the Kollel Menachem Lubavitch, Melbourne, of which he was Programme Director, and from the chief rabbi of Haifa, Rabbi S.Y. Cohen. He is also a Senior Research Fellow and lecturer in the Australian Centre for Jewish Civilization, Monash University.
For further information and forthcoming events, visit the website:
www.ijc.ozsurf.net.au; or call Rabbi Cowen: 9527 5902
Last November, the Institute published thefourth volume in its series, Monographs in Judaism and Civilization entitled Perspectives on the Noahide Laws- Universal Ethics, by Rabbi Shimon Cowen. It is intended as a scholarly basis for wider discussion of the Noahide laws, the code ofuniversal law and ethics set out in Torah for the gentile world.The work has been praised by a number ofsenior academics on a world scale, including Professor Robert P.George, Princeton University, a member of the US President’s Council on Bioethics
XII. Jewish Public Law and Other Legal Systems
Rakover, "The 'Law' and the Noahides."
Enker, "Aspects of Interaction between the Torah Law, the King's Law, and the Noahide Law in Jewish Criminal Law."
Shilo, Shmuel: "Maimonides on 'Dina de-Malkhuta Dina' (The Law of the State is Law)"
Kirschenbaum, "The Role of Punishment in Jewish Criminal Law: a Chapter in Rabbinic Penological Thought."
Cohen, 195 -206
Stone, Suzanne Last: "Siniatic and Noahide Law: Legal Pluralism in Jewish Law"
Research Seminars and Guest Lectures: Seminars were given by Donald McCallum, University of Manchester, on "A Wittgensteinian approach to Maimonides' Guide"; Dr Uri Ehrlich, BGU, on "Early Versions of the Amidah Prayer", and Dr Meir Bar-Asher, HU, "Jews and Judaism in Early Shi'ite Religious Literature". A fourth seminar, by Prof Irven Resnick, U Tenn., on "Medieval Stereotypes of the Jew: Evidence from Natural Philosophy and Medicine" had to be cancelled because of the speaker's indisposition. A special rabbinics seminar by Prof. Arnold Enker, of Bar-Ilan University, on "Criminal Law Aspects of the Noahide Laws", attracted a substantial audience despite being held in July. The 2003 AGM was followed by a guest lecture by Professor Joseph Kostiner of Tel Aviv University on "The Arab States and Israel: A present evaluation".
Novak went on to discuss the Noahide laws as the most fundamental of all commonalities between Judaism and any gentile nation on earth. The acceptance of the Noahide law is really the acceptance of natural law. It applies to all humankind. Jews can very well see in Christians those human beings outside the people of Israel who have understood these truths of natural law best. In addition, a community that acknowledges the supreme Lordship of God is a community Jews can respect in principle.
Christianity has appropriated only part of the law of the Torah for itself, the moral law, and has not appropriated those laws that are addressed to Israel in its very separateness (diet, dress, etc.). This partialness of the Christian appropriation of Jewish law is the key problem with Christian normativeness for Jewish theology. It was an extremely intense problem in regard to early Jewish Christians who were seen as discarding parts of the Torah; but it is a lesser problem concerning Gentile Christians who can be understood as voluntarily taking on parts of the Torah beyond Noahide Law. Christians, of course, understood that they had superseded the Old Law with a better one. This asymmetry between the two traditions shows why neither group would want the other to have superior political power - the other would inevitably assume a second class status. Neither can tolerate the other as "Israel."
Conse- quently, when Congress acts on a resolution as if it were a law, the way I look at it, is they can never be charged with violating a law, for the simple reason it was never a law, but merely a resolution. Do you think perhaps, Ted, that's the reason they have proceeded in the manner they have for the last 60 plus years? Please note the use of the word "world" in the above quotation ("return the world to the noxal and ethical val- ues..."). The "world", of course, being the "New World Order". When the 'Noahide Laws" were passed 3,000 years ago, the law stated: "This law shall be enforced in all the courts of the land." There are seven (7) Noahide Laws, which on the surface might appear to be harmless.
Royce R. Till Professor of Law
University of Houston - Law Center
100 Law Center
Houston, TX 77204-6060
Click here for email address
Of God's Mercy and the Four Biblical Methods of Capital punishment: Stoning, Burning, Beheading, and Strangulation
Tulane Law Review, Vol. 79, p. 1169, March 2004
Irene Merker Rosenberg and Yale L. Rosenberg
University of Houston - Law Center and University of Houston - Law Center
Date posted to database: January 5, 2005
Over the past decades following the publication of Lynn White's landmark essay on “The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis,”2 many theologians and biblical scholars have been challenged to rethink their religious traditions along ecophilosophical lines.3 In this spirit, I was invited by Rabbi Shimon Cowan to participate in a forum in Melbourne on Jewish and Christian perspectives on humanity's relationship with animals and, by extension, the more-than-human natural world in general. The point of departure for our discussion was the seventh and last 'Noahide' law: the law that was given to Noah following the Flood, according to which humanity was given permission to eat meat, as well as plants, but with the proviso that we abstain from consuming living flesh, and specifically, blood (Genesis 9:3-4). In Rabbi Cowan's view, the Noahide laws, which comprise also injunctions against idolatry, blasphemy, forbidden sexual relations, murder, theft and lawlessness, are presented in the Torah as binding, not only upon Jews, but upon all the descendents of Noah, that is, all humanity, and as such represent a promising basis for dialogue between Jews and non-Jews.4 My own contribution to this discussion, which appears here in revised form, comes from the perspective of someone who, not unlike the German romantic philosopher Schelling,5 seeks among the embers of the Judaeo-Christian tradition sparks that might one day be kindled into a new religion of the earth: one that would be at once profoundly humane and genuinely ecological.
Hauser Global Law School Program, New York University School of Law
40 Washington Square South, New York, New York 10012-1099
Forum Paper Title: Involuntary Particularism: The Noahide Laws, Citizenship, and Alienage
Download the paper in Rich Text Format
"Involuntary Particularism" argues that the code of law known as the Noahides, which the Talmud assumed applied to all non-Jews but especially to those living in a Jewish commonwealth, can shed light on how to shape United States policy towards lawful permanent residents. The paper argues that Noahide law, commonly taken to be a universal law or a minimal political law, actually required non-Jews, particularly those who wished to live in a Jewish commonwealth, to adopt a nonintuitive Jewish perspective of several central topics. In an important twist, we show that the Jews who articulated Noahide law quite possibly thought of themselves as espousing universally intuitive truths. Their necessary particularism, their legal statements necessarily reflecting their view of the world, gives an example of a fact Robert Cover and others have noted before, that legal systems are nomoi, are expressions of a worldview. That example suggests that the United States would profit by engaging in a careful discussion and decision process about which ideals are truly fundamental to the project of this country. Doing so would, as a first step, improve citizenship and the bonds of this society, making clearer to Americans the ideals that bind them into one whole. In addition, though, it would clarify the role of the Lawful Permanent Resident. Some scholars have argued that all such people should be made citizens, since there is no meaningful difference between the two. Noting that current law does not require those applying to be resident aliens to commit to the ideals of the country (just to live according to the Constitution and the laws), the paper uses the Noahide example to suggest that there be an ideological component to admitting people for Lawful Permanent Residence. Since they are not going to become citizens, however, they need not commit to all of the country's ideals. Instead, using Michael Walzer's notion of a "thick" and "thin" version of a worldview, we suggest that a thinner form be produced, to which LPRs would need to commit. We then apply the idea that LPRs need to commit to partial citizenship to several currently troubling issues about their status. We suggest that there should be three tiers of benefits, those given to all human beings who happen to be on American soil, those given to full citizens, and an in-between set for those who are willing to commit to this country partially but not fully. Stressing the existence of a particularly American worldview promotes retaining the language requirement, since language is so essential to how people construct their world. Dual citizenship, in our model, can be allowed with countries whose ideals are reasonably similar to those of the US, but not with those whose ideals fundamentally differ from ours. Our model also argues for producing a faster track to citizenship than the five years currently required, for those who are already willing to commit to the thicker version of the American ideal
Protocols of zions Illuminated "masters"
"We must inculcate this doctrine with Kings and Princes, that the Catholic faith cannot exist in the present state, without politics; but that in this, it is necessary to proceed with much certainty. Of this mode, we must share the affection of the great, and be admitted to the most secret councils."
PURIM Pope John Paul, just in time for the Sanhedrins Noahide Catholicos
Rv:13:11: And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
Michel LauriganThe sellout in Jewish Christian relations since nineteen forty-six.
Stained glass window dedicated to the Second Vatican Council, Our Lady of Lourdes, West Orange, New Jersey. Top left is Pope John XXIII, with the Holy Ghost, watching Pope Paul VI continuing the work of the Council.
Ecumenism is a phase in the battle between the Church and the Synagogue of Satan (Apoc.2:9).
The plan revealed in 1884 by Elijah Benamozegh, the cabalist rabbi from Livorno,
Italy, was a new assault on the Church-not to wipe Catholicism off the face of the earth-but to "transform" it and bring it into accordance with theNoaicLaw.1
Was the Second Vatican Council a step to implement this plan?
The importance of this article is understood by reading the address of Bishop Joseph Dore to a Jewish lodge of B'nai B'rith,2 titled"The Church and the Synagogue" (see pp.69-73).
I will put enmity between thee and the woman; between thy seed and her seed. (Gen. 3:15)
On October 28, 1998, at the discerning of the prize Nostra Aetate,3granted jointly by Samuel Pisar and the Center for Understanding Between Jews and Christians of Sacred Heart University of Fairfield, Connecticut, at the Sutton Place Synagogue in New York, Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger, Archbishop of Paris, made a declaration whose title was full of promise Jews and Christians, Tomorrow.4 This declaration, whose importance was perfectly evident to contemporaries, still merits our attention today. Before the leaders of the Jewish world, the Cardinal presented an historical tableau of the relations between Christians and Jews and went on to make an in-depth analysis of the work of salvation of mankind. We might have hoped for a reminder of the Catholic teaching on the history of salvation. A few citations from the Cardinal will permit the reader to form an idea of the gravity of the subject matter and will serve as introduction to the present study.
As we are nearing the third millennium of the Christian era, a new age has begun in the history of mankind—A page is being turned in the history of humankind....In Christian-Jewish relationships, Christians have opened their eyes and ears to the Jewish pain and wounds. They accept to be held responsible and agree to bear that burden without rejecting it on others.5
For what fault should Christians be bearing the burden? The Cardinal takes it upon himself to respond in the chapter entitled "Election and Jealousy," a chapter that would deserve to be cited in full, so twisted is its presentation of the history of salvation. The election is that of the unfaithful Jewish nation, an election that has never been revoked, with the "setting aside of the elect" in "reserve." The jealousy is that of Christians:
Christian jealousy of
Israelvery quickly took the shape of a claim for a legacy: just get rid of the other, who is so close and yet so different!...The pagans who had become Christians gained access to the Holy Scriptures and to the Jewish festivals. But human—only too human—envy prompted them to marginalize or throw out the Jews [meaning their Judaism, their practices, their rites, and their beliefs]6 ....But [the Cardinal adds] the number and might of the pagans who had entered the Church of the Messiah upset the inverted order of the dispensation of salvation. This movement tended to deprive the Jewish existence of its concrete, carnal, historical contents, and to consider the life of the Church until recent history, as the final achievement of Jewish hope and life.7 This was how the theory of substitution was developed.8
Cardinal Lustiger goes on to try to prove that the Jews were thus despoiled by Christians of their role as the chosen people, the priestly people who are to bring salvation to mankind:
...When Constantine granted the Christians a tolerance that was tantamount to a recognition of Christianity in the life of the State and eventually led to make it the religion of the Empire, the Jews were brutally rejected. This was a simplistic and unrefined way of denying redemption the time and childbirth labor that it requires....9
The mythology10 of the substitution of the Christian people for the Jewish people fostered a secret, inextinguishable envy and legitimated the captation [i.e., usurpation -Ed.] of
Israel's legacy, of which countless examples could be offered. (I will mention only one: the French kings' claim to descend from David. This led their advisors to have them crowned according to the ritual designed for the kings of Israel, as reported in the Bible and as had already been done in Byzantium.)11
At the end of his historical tableau and his very particular theology of history, the Cardinal reassures his audience. Times have changed: the time of contempt has passed, giving way to the time of respect.12 The heritage will soon be rendered to its legitimate owner, the Jewish people, the true Israel, once again become the priestly people13 who will bring authentic salvation to the nations, peace to the Gentiles, and the unity of which the world is so much in need. His discourse concludes with this word of hope:
This new awareness was condensed for the Catholic Church in the Second Vatican Council's Nostra Aetate Declaration. In the last 30 years it has given way to many comments, especially on the initiatives of Pope John Paul II. However, this new understanding still has to remodel in depth the ideas of many peoples who belong to the Christian sphere but whose hearts have not yet been purified by the Spirit of the Messiah. Historical experience shows us that lasting "patience" and many educational efforts are required to "appropriate one's soul" (Lk. 21:19).
Notwithstanding, there is no steering away from the direction we are now following.14
In summary: The "appropriation" of the heritage by jealous Christians who supplanted the Jews in their role as the people of God and instrument of the salvation of the world. -The recognition and confession of this fault in the 20th century after a new awareness that came with Vatican II.—The heritage must come back to the dispossessed Jews. -It will be necessary to do reparation for the fault committed and to allow the necessary time for the Christian spirit to change.—The march of history is irreversible.
More recently-in 2002—Cardinal Lustiger spoke before the European Jewish Congress,15 before the World Jewish Congress16 and before the American Jewish Committee17 to expose his "reflection on the election and the vocation of
Israeland its relations with the nations." His Judeo-Christian syncretism18seems to please the elites of Judaism without the Catholic world's raising the least objection to the heterodoxy of his thought.
and now the evangelical Judeao-Churchians
How has a cardinal, at the end of the 20th century, managed to rewrite the history of salvation to the point of denying the entire redemptive work of Jesus Christ, continued by His Church? How was the spiritual subversion of the 20th century carried off?
Was it at the Second Vatican Council, as Cardinal Lustiger would have us believe? If the Church is no longer the verm
Israel, what does she become in this new theology of history? It is to these delicate questions that this study will attempt to give a response.
Historical Attempts to "Recover the Heritage"
Originally chosen by God for a magnificent mission—to give mankind the Savior—the Jewish people were the hope and honor of humanity during the two millennia before Jesus Christ. They preserved the divine promises, bore witness to the true God in the midst of pagan idolatry, kept intact here below the faith, the truth, and the pure and substantial worship of the Father, as well as the expectation of the Savior of the world. Until the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Jews were, in all truth, "the people of God"; in choosing to be born of the race of Abraham, Christ Jesus crowned and consecrated it with His own sanctity.
However, Calvary separated the chosen people in two: on the one hand, the disciples, the Apostles, and the first Christians who recognized in Jesus crucified the Messias come to accomplish the Law and the Prophets, and who adhered fully to His message, His spirit, and His Mystical Body: . On the other hand fall those on whose head, and by whose own desire, fell the blood of the Just,19placing them under a malediction that will endure as long as their rebellion.
"Their act of deicide dug an abyss between ancient and modern times, which the divine mercy will fill up one day when justice will have done its work," writes Monsignor Delassus.20
For two millennia, those whorejected the Law of Moses for the Talmud have undertaken to thwart the work of Redemption. They have participated in all of the rebellions of the human spirit against God and against His Christ, whom they have not wished to recognize, and against His Church, which they consider a "usurper." Even as she protected herself against them, and even as she reminds the world of the horror of deicide, the Church has never ceased to pursue them with her charity, in order to lead them back to the fold, to the source of grace: to Calvary where flowed the redeeming Blood. This charity even pushed the Church to protect them, rejected as they often were by Christian nations. The true converts among them have countless times born witness to the charity of the Church in their regard.21
However, the workers of iniquity were little moved by this mildness on the part of the Roman pontiffs. In each century, the attacks against the Church and against Catholic civilization have redoubled. Joshua Jehouda, author of a work entitled Anti-Semitism: A Mirror of the World22 describing those of the modern and contemporary ages: "Three attempts on the part of the Jewish world have aimed to purify the Christian consciousness of its miasmas of hate; three breaches effected in the out-dated fortress of Christian obscurantism; three steps in the effort to destroy the Catholic dogmatic." These three steps were the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Revolution: "The Renaissance, the Reformation and the Revolution constitute three attempts to rectify Christian thought in bringing it into harmony with the progressive development of reason and science." The author specifies: "In spite of these three attempts to purify Christian dogma of its anti-Semitism, Christian theology has not yet cast off its contempt." That is why "[i]n the nineteenth century two new attempts were made to purify the mentality of the Christian world, one by Marx and the other by Nietzsche."23
The Jewish thinker deplores the partial failure of these two new attempts. The fortress of Catholicism continued to hold out strong. Only with the post-World War II era would the most subtle and destructive attack be launched against the Roman Catholic Church: to change Catholic theology through the work of churchmen themselves. It was "a revolution in tiara and cope," initiated in the 19th century by the Carbonari, pursued by the modernists in the 20th century, and finally triumphant at Vatican II.
Vatican II: The Open Door
After World War II, Jewish organizations sought to address the Christian world on the necessity of revising the teaching of the Church on Judaism.
In 1946, the Oxford Conference, under the auspices of British and American Jewish organizations, reunited Catholics and Protestants for a debate concerning problems encountered since the war: a simple first contact. A second international conference was organized at Seelisberg, in
Switzerland, primarily concerned with the problem of anti-Semitism. To a large degree, this was a gathering of experts.24 Among the 60 or so participants figured Fr.Journet.25 Jacques Maritain, for his part, was unable to participate at the conference; however, he sent a warm message of encouragement.26 Jules Isaac became the "key player" at this gathering. The conference culminated in a manifesto entitled The Ten Points of Seelisberg. Of these ten points, we can retain the following:
5) Avoid distorting or misrepresenting biblical or post-biblical Judaism with the object of extolling Christianity.
6) Avoid using the word "Jews" in the exclusive sense of the enemies of Jesus, and the words "the enemies of Jesus" to designate the whole Jewish people.
7) Avoid presenting the Passion in such a way as to bring the odium of the killing of Jesus upon all Jews or upon Jews alone...
8) Avoid promoting the superstitious notion that the Jewish people are reprobate, accursed, reserved for a destiny of suffering.27
"The archives of Jules Isaac bear witness to the tireless activity of our author." The words are of Andre Kaspi, who recently published a biography outlining the personality of Jules Isaac.28 In it he confirms a number of known facts and reveals a few others. One of the most important contributions of Jules Isaac was his book Jesus andfor a new theology of the Judeo-Christian relationship.
Israel, which sought to prove that the Jewish people were neither deicide nor cursed, but that Christianity was responsible for ambient anti-Semitism by its theological anti-Judaism. This work went on to expose 21 points, a veritable "manifesto"
In 1948, Isaac founded 'Judeo-Christian Friendship," whose aim was clearly proclaimed: the "rectification of Christian teaching." Many liberal Catholics participated in these gatherings whose bias was evident. "The ten points of Seelisberg and the twenty-one points of Jesus and
Israelwere passed out on all sides,"29 writes Kaspi. At the same time, Isaac was persuaded to meet with the head of the Catholic Church. Pius XII received him briefly October 16, 1949, at Castel Gandolfo. Jules Isaac exposed the ten points of Seelisberg to the Sovereign Pontiff; the outcome of the meeting was of little satisfaction to a writer of history manuals.
In October 1959, Cletta Mayer and Daniel Mayer-founders of CEPA (Centre d'Etudes des Problemes Actuels, Center for the Study of Modern Problems),in close collaboration with the Anti-Defamation League (an association created in 1913 by the Masonic Lodge B'nai B'rith)-"met with Jules Isaac in Paris at the Hotel Terminus and spoke with him of an eventual proposition for John XXIII. Jules Isaac approved."30
The idea of convoking a council had been launched by John XXIII several months earlier.31 A preparatory commission was established, in which participated a number of theologians and eminent personalities. However, in the shadows an anti-council was in preparation that was to supplant the true one when the time came. Ralph Wiltgen has given sufficient proof of the fact in The Rhine Flows into the Tiber: A History of Vatican II.32
In mid-June 1960, on the advice of Monsignor Julien, Isaac addressed himself to Augustine Cardinal Bea, the German Jesuit. "I found in him a powerful supporter." It is true that a certain gossip already suspected Cardinal Bea of having "remained Jewish at heart."33 His support was even more powerful than Isaac could have ever hoped. He obtained an audience with Jean XXIII without difficulty, June 13, 1960. On this occasion, Isaac handed the Pope a thesis entitled: On the Necessity of a Reform of Christian Teaching Regardingfirm condemnation of Catholic "anti-Semitism" to come from the council he had just convoked. Henceforth there were a number of exchanges between the council offices at the
Israel. "I asked if I might carry away with me some glimmer of hope," Isaac recounts. John XXIII replied that he was entitled to more than a hope, but "that he was not an absolute monarch." After Isaac had left, John XXIII made it quite clear to the administrators of the Vatican Curia that he expected a Vaticanand organizations of the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League, as well as those of B'nai B'rith. These Jewish associations knew how to make themselves heard at Rome.34
Indeed, if Isaac worked relentlessly, he was not alone. Rabbi Abraham J. Heschel of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York, who had heard of Bea for the first time 30 years before in Berlin, sought to meet with the cardinal in Rome. On that occasion, the two men discussed two files prepared by the American Jewish Committee, one on "The image of the Jews in Catholic teaching," the other 20 pages concerning "Anti-Jewish elements in the Catholic liturgy."
Heschel declared that he hoped the Council would expurgate from Catholic teaching all suggestion that the Jews were a cursed race. At the same time, Heschel added, the Council would in no way exhort the Jews to become Christians.35
During the same timeframe, Dr. Goldmann, head of the World Conference of Jewish Organizations,
also confided his aspirations to John XXIII. In addition, B'nai B'rith put pressure on Catholics to reform their liturgy and suppress in their religious services any word that might seem unfavorable to the Jews and that calls to mind the "deicide." "Wise and long-mitred heads around the Curia warned that the bishops in council should not touch this issue with ten-foot staffs. But still there was John XXIII, who said they must."36
At Rome, therefore, various Fathers busied themselves with the drafting of a text on Judaism, including Fr. Baum and Monsignor John Osterreicher,37 members of Cardinal Bea's general staff. The declaration, containing a clear refutation of the accusation of deicide, was to be presented at the first session of the Council, opening October 11, 1962. The World Jewish Congress was pleased with the drafting of such a text; it made its satisfaction known, and decided to send the Israeli Dr. Charm Y. Ward to the Council as an observer.
Vaticanwas immediately besieged by protestations from Arab countries, outraged by the preferential treatment accorded to the Jews. As a result, in June 1962, the Secretary of State, in accord with Cardinal Bea, withdrew from the agenda the discussion of the planned declaration Dejudaeis, prepared by the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity.38
An agency-close enough to the Curia to have access to the private addresses of 2,200 cardinals and bishops temporarily residing in Rome—sent simultaneously to each of them a900-page book entitled The Plot Against the Church and signed with a pseudonym, Maurice Pinay. The thesis of the book-based on numerous facts and multiple citations-was that the Jews had constantly sought to infiltrate the Church and subvert her teaching and that they were on the point of succeeding. Such documentary evidence should have warned the Council Fathers of a subversive movement within the Council. The utmost prudence was called for.
The withdrawal of the project for a declaration on the Jews at the first session of the Council was a veritable defeat for Bea, who nonetheless refused to be discouraged. March 31, 1963, at the Hotel Plana in New York, he had a secret meeting with the authorities of the American Jewish Committee,39 who insisted that the united bishops change thetheology of the Church concerning the history of salvation. "Globally," he said, "the Jews are accused of being guilty of deicide, and a curse supposedly weighs upon them." He refuted these two accusations and reassured the rabbis. Those present in the room wanted to know if the declaration would admit publicly that deicide, the curse, and the rejection of the Jewish people by God, were errors in Christian teaching. Bea replied evasively and this high-society gathering drew to a close over a glass of sherry!
A short time later Rolf Hochhuth's play The Deputy premiered, calumniating Pius XII on his attitude during the war. This way of putting pressure was not terribly subtle, but it could have an influence on the conciliar assembly...
Over the course of the second session of the Council, in the fall of 1963, the declaration on the Jews was put in the hands of the bishops. From then on it became the fourth chapter of a declaration on ecumenism, which apparently allowed it to pass more discretely. M. Schuster, the European director of the Jewish-American Committee, considered the distribution of the project to the Council Fathers as "one of the greatest moments in History." The text was discussed at length40 and then strangely withdrawn from the vote at the end of the session. The defenders of Catholic orthodoxy had just distributed a number of works on The Jews in the Light of Scripture and Tradition,41 which should also have alerted the Council Fathers to the enemy's game. Apparently, the warning was again heeded. "Something happened in the wings," commented the National Catholic Welfare Conference.
Without going into the details of a long story, let us just say that two other projects would be proposed and discussed at length during the third and fourth sessions. Over the course of 1964 and 1965, Jewish interventions before Paul VI were to multiply. The personalities with the most influence over the Pope were Joseph Lichten of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, Zachariah Schuster and Leonard Sperry of the American Jewish Committee, the American Cardinal Spellman, Arthur J. Goldberg, American Supreme Court judge, and Rabbi Heschel.
Roddy makes the following revelation:
In Rome [before the third session], six members of the American Jewish Committee had an audience with the Pope....The Pope told his callers he agreed with all Cardinal Spellman had said about Jewish guilt.
A few lines later, he again underlines:and asked the Pontiff to press for a declaration in which Catholics would be forbidden to proselytize Jews.43
With the American Jewish Committee's Shuster beside him, Heschel talked hard about deicide42 and guilt,
On November 20, 1964, during the third session, bishops and cardinals united voted by a large majority in favor of the provisional schema concerning the Church's attitude toward Judaism.44Leon de Poncins hastened to draft an opuscule entitled The Jewish Problem Before the Council, which was distributed to all the Fathers before the fourth and last session. It was the final warning. In his introduction, the author observes "a profound misconception of the essence of Judaism on the part of the Council Fathers."45 The brochure did a certain amount of good, permitting the "front of refusal"46to sharpen its arguments. This front managed to eliminate certain expressions from the first version such as: "Although a large part of the chosen people remain temporarily far from Christ, it would be an injustice to call them a people under a curse...or deicide." It had them replaced by those that figure in the final version of Nostra Aetate adopted October 28, 1965, by 2221 voices, against only 88, during the fourth session: "The Jews should not be presented as repudiated or cursed by God, as though such a conclusion followed from Scripture."
After these troubled years of an unprecedented doctrinal war; after these struggles for influence among the Curia and the Council Fathers; after the diffusion of numerous texts defending the theology of salvation as taught by the Church for two millennia, a compromise was reached over a new text. On the whole, the Jews were disappointed by the document's content. They had hoped for more. Yet a door had been opened...one it would be difficult to close. Indeed, for the first time with Nostra Aetate, the bishops of the Catholic Church had given a positive and bold presentation of unbelieving Jews. Andre Chouraqui underlines the fact, together with its ramifications:
All of a sudden, the Church, struck by near-total amnesia for almost two millennia, remembers the spiritual bond uniting it to
Israel, the race of Abraham, restored to the privileged situation of elder brother in the family of the people of God. This fundamental theological recognition is heavy with consequences that will be revealed for centuries to come—We had to wait twenty centuries before the Church came to a new awareness of her Jewish roots.... What is more, the Church categorically rejects all form of proselytism in their regard. She forbids what she once taught.47
John Halperin, of the Office of the World Jewish Conference in Geneva, confirmed Chouraqui's statements on the occasion of a colloquium at Fribourg:
We need to emphasize the fact that the 1965 declaration Nostra Aetate truly opened the way toward an entirely new dialogue and inaugurated in the Church a new way of looking8 at the Jews and Judaism by manifesting the Church's openness to substituting a doctrine of respect for one of contempt.49
Menahem Macina50 corroborates this judgment:
We must not forget the immense progress that the declaration Nostra Aetate represents in comparison with the previous situation. A single observation will allow us to appreciate the distance that has been covered. The reader may know that popes and councils, when they promulgate documents destined to all of Christendom, customarily seek out citations in the writings of their predecessors to support the teaching they intend to promote by their new documents, in order to illustrate the continuity of Church doctrine and tradition. However, unlike the Council's text on Islam, there is not a single reference in the declaration on the Jews to any positive precedent, be it in the works of the Fathers, or of ecclesiastical writers, or of the popes.51
Numerous testimonies could be cited to confirm this analysis. We will end with this statement by Paul Giniewski in his fundamental work, Christian Anti-Judaism: The Mutation: "The schema on the Jews, which might have been considered as an end, proved on the contrary and very rapidly to be the inauguration of a new phase in the positive evolution of Judeo-Christian relations."52
The door had been opened....53 The men of the Church admitted that the Jews were no longer "a people under a curse." No longer cursed, nor reprobate. "Henceforth," Chouraqui continues, "The Church recognized the permanence of Judaism in the plan of God, and the irreversible character of the principles defined by Nostra Aetate, thus refusing any restriction or ambiguity in the dialogue with the Jews." The seeds had been sown; they had only to grow..."From then on, it was necessary to keep going forward on the road to mutual recognition between Jews and Christians. But it was impossible to dismiss as profit and loss two thousand years of bloody struggle."54
The purification of the Christian sphere55 could now begin.
Purifying the Christian Sphere
Christians first said,
"We, too, are
The debates subsequent to Vatican II's "new awareness" have little by little prepared the Christian world for a new theology of the relations between the Church and Judaism.57 To change our mentality by "many educational efforts" aimed at those of the "Christian sphere": such was the object of the directives issued by the Vatican58 and by the various episcopacies for nearly 40 years. This effort tends toward:
1) Emphasizing the permanence of the first Covenant;
2)Teaching respect for the (unbelieving) Jewish people, "a priestly nation";
3)Renouncing all attempt to convert the Jews;
4)Constantly advancing dialogue and cooperation with Judaism;
5)Preparing the way toward a Noaic religion.
Influential members of
Two examples will serve to illustrate our thesis: the text of the French Episcopal Committee for Jewish Relations(Easter, 1973) and the American Episcopacy's Reflections on Covenant and Mission (August 12, 2002). According to the Jews, these two declarations go far beyond the affirmations of the Council. The heterodox expressions are obvious:
Christians should regard Judaism not only as a social and historical reality, but as one that is above all religious; not as an outdated relic of a venerable past, but as a living, evolving reality. The principle indicators of this vitality of the Jewish people are: the testimony of its collective fidelity to one God; its fervor in examining the Scriptures to discover the meaning of human life in the light of Revelation; its search for an identity among other men; its constant effort to gather together into a reunited community. These signs pose to us, Christians, a question that touches the heart of our faith: What is the mission proper to the Jewish people in the plan of God?
An election that endures: the first Covenant was not passing. Contrary to an exegesis that is ancient but difficult to defend, it does not follow from the New Testament that the Jewish people were despoiled of their election. On the contrary, the whole of Scripture moves us to recognize the sign of God's fidelity to His people in the Jewish people's constant effort to remain faithful to the Law and the Covenant. Indeed, the New Covenant did not render the first one obsolete. The Jewish people are conscious of having received a universal mission to the Nations, by way of their unique vocation.59
What is this mission? We will examine that in a paragraph below. The second declaration, more recent, is that of the American bishops. It is truly astonishing:
The Roman Catholic reflections describe the growing respect for the Jewish tradition that has unfolded since the Second Vatican Council. A deepening Catholic appreciation of the eternal covenant between God and the Jewish people, together with a recognition of a divinely-given mission to Jews to witness to God's faithful love, lead to the conclusion that campaigns that target Jews for conversion to Christianity are no longer theologically acceptable in the Catholic Church.60
The testimonies of theologians on the permanence of the first Covenant are abundant and we could produce a litany of citations. Here are a few of them:
Perhaps we should go to the heart of the issue and consider the dethronement of the mother-religion by the daughter-religion under a new perspective. The idea of the New Covenant taking up where the Old left off is at the origin of the Judeo-Christian split with all of its consequences. In one of his great theological studies, significantly entitled The Covenant Never Abolished, Professor Norbert Lohfink, a Jesuit and professor of Biblical research at the Papal University of Rome, affirms peremptorily: "The popular Christian concept of the New Covenant promotes anti-Judaism."61
We believe that Christ established a New Covenant. Did He render the Old Covenant obsolete in so doing? We long thought so. There are surely Christians who still think so today.62
Alan Marchandour does not hesitate to write, on the occasion of a colloquium entitled "The Trial of Jesus: The Trial of the Jews?":
For a long time,
Christians only saw
Such a language is
Charles Perrot, of the Catholic Institute of Paris, expresses a similar way of thinking:
If the Church substitutes itself for Israel-if she replaces Israel-is that not to say by the very fact that she eliminates it, by absorption or worse? Yet such language is dangerous. Can it still be admissible in our day?64
The Church has to
"revise" its history as much as its theology. To this end, the
All of the experts reaffirmed the Jewish origins of Christianity and qualified as aberrant the theology of substitution, namely that the New Covenant in Christ would annul the Old Covenant. In opening the symposium, Cardinal Etchegaray (president of the Jubilee organizational committee)65 explained in his gravelly voice, straight from the gorges of the Pyrenees: "It is question of examining the relations between Christians and Jews, too often reversed." The same discourse was taken up by the animator of the encounter, the Swiss Dominican Georges Cottier, the Pope's private theologian (and the president of the Jubilee's theological-historical committee), who reminded his audience: "Our reflection bears on the divine plan of salvation and on the role of the Jewish people within it—the chosen people; the people of the Covenant and of the promises.
That the theology of substitution is an aberration remains an essential point, admitted since Vatican II but difficult to spread among the people," remarked a participant.66
And the journalist of the daily poses the question: "Why would Rome call together experts from the five continents in order to verify something that would seem today to be a truth of the faith?"
Another colloquium was held at the University of Fribourg from March 16 to 20, 1998, under the theme of Judaism, Anti-Judaism and Christianity. Editions Saint Augustin published the acts of the colloquium in the year 2000. All the speeches delivered are of the greatest interest.
The European Encounters Between Jews and Catholics were held even more recently, organized by the European Jewish Congress, January 28-29, 2002, in Paris, on the theme: After Vatican II and Nostra Aetate: The Deepening of Relations Between Jews and Catholics in Europe under the Pontificate of John Paul II.67 Several European personalities engaged in the dialogue between Jews and Catholics received honorific awards.
An evening party organized in the conference rooms of the Paris city hall, Monday, January 28, reunited some 700 people, Catholics and Jews. At the speaker's table were seated Master Henri Hajdenberg, president of the gathering; Cardinal Lustiger; the chief rabbi of Moscow, Pinchas Goldschmidt; the chief rabbi Rene Samuel Sirat; Dr. Michel Friedman, vice-president of the European Jewish Congress; and Walter Cardinal Kasper, president of the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with Judaism. In their discourses, all of the speakers underlined the importance of the progress made since Nostra Aetate:
Much was said that evening about the present relations between Jews and Catholics: a new spirit passed over us, truly translating into action the gestures and the words of Catholics, above all those of John Paul II. "A new page; a new step;" such is the sentiment, moreover, that would continue to be confirmed during the course of the next day. After the exposes of the different speakers, the projection of the film Pope John Paul II in the Holy Land imposed an impressive silence over the vast conference room. Over the course of the following day, January 29, before a more limited public, in the presence of several cardinals, bishops and Jewish personalities, as well as a few delegations of people from Germany, Austria, Belgium, Italy, Switzerland, and Poland, in a frank and positive atmosphere, speakers discussed The Evolution of Judeo-Catholic Relations: From the Theory of Substitution to Mutual Respect, and The Necessary Transmission of the Memory of Shoah, in the context of today.
Over the course of the
afternoon, various speakers exposed The Challenges of Assimilation and
Secularization, and The Evolution of Judeo-Catholic Relations with the
We could multiply the accounts of the various reunions, congresses, colloquia, days of encounter, etc., that spring up every year.
The Roman Notes from June 24, 1985, should be read and meditated in the light of what has just
been said: Notes on the Correct Way to Present the Jews and Judaism in Preaching and Catechesis in the Roman Catholic Church.69
The gesture of John Paul II at the synagogue of Rome, April 13, 1986, is an illustration of this method. His visit was highly symbolic: "The Church of Christ, in the person of John Paul II, comes forward to the synagogue and discovers its link with Judaism by contemplating its own mystery." John Paul II said on this occasion:
The Jewish religion is not "extrinsic" to us, but in a certain way is "intrinsic" to our own religion. With Judaism therefore we have a relationship which we do not have with any other religion. You are our dearest brothers and, in a certain way, it could be said that you are our elder brothers.70
The most important event
for Jews since the Holocaust has been the re-establishment of a Jewish state in
the Promised Land. As members of a biblically based religion, Christians
Christians have no other choice than to be thrilled about the presence of the Jews in the Holy Land.
Paul Giniewski analyzes the teaching of the last 40 years in the light of Jewish thought.72 He distinguishes three phases:
● the "vidouy," that is to say, the sincere recognition of the fault committed and of one's errors;
● the "techouva," which signifies conversion to the contrary behavior;
● finally, and most importantly, the "tikkun" or the reparation.
The Jewish writer asks himself which phase we have reached. "The techouva" he replies, without hesitation. This phase will not be achieved until the day
will have raised up numerous vocations of students and teachers of the new doctrine. The objective is ambitious: to cause a teaching to be heard and accepted that is contrary to the one that was previously taught....Thus the crucifixion of the Jews will come to an end.
when the teaching of respect will be formulated in didactic texts and their propagation
Finally, the Church will have to make reparation. Certain authors have already described what the "tikkun" will be.
Jews will once again assume their role before the nations,
a role that is clarified in a number of works including a brochure destined to
popularize the theme, The Mission of
March 12, 2000, at St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, John Paul II, in the name of the Catholic Church, read a mea culpa74 for the faults of Christians over the course of history. This gesture can only be understood in the context of a new consciousness of the Church's persecution "by the Inquisition"75 (a system of violence and constraint) of the people of the Covenant, long despoiled and persecuted. Thus Christians have accomplished their "vidouy."
Furthermore, so that these actions would be sufficiently clear to both parties, namely to Christians as well as to Jews, the text of repentance was slipped by John Paul II himself into a crack in the Wailing Wall,76 part of the ruins of the Temple of the Old Covenant. A wall that awaits only to be reconstructed in the religious capital of the renewed Covenant: Jerusalem dethroning Rome, the usurper.77
Not one stone was left standing upon another
If the Church is no
longer the verus
This study is already lengthy, and is not the place to present all the aspects of theNoaic religion. This religion, introduced with Vatican II, is destined to supplant Catholicism.78 The subject is so vast that a colloquium could easily be consecrated to it. We will give a few historical markers and point out various aspects of this new "Catholicism."
Catholicos of Sanhedrin's High Priest
After the French
Revolution, which emancipated the Jews and permitted them to enter civil
societies, the rabbis and Jewish thinkers considered the religious aspect of the
world they were bringing into being...It would also be necessary to resolve the
religious problem that would most certainly arise. What was at stake in these
theological debates between the rabbis of the 19th century can be summarized as
follows: "When we will have recovered our role as a people called to bring
salvation to the Gentiles, what will be the religion of
Christians, who imagined themselves to be the new
Elijah Benamozegh, the rabbi of Livorno, the Plato of Italian Judaism and "one of the masters of contemporary Jewish thought,"79 proposed a solution that he published in 1884 in his master-work Israel and Humanity.80 The sub-title is evocative: A Study on the Problem of a Universal Religion, and Its Solution. Benamozegh's solution, around which would rally little by little the supporters of Judaism, can be summarized as follows:
The Catholic Church should reform her teaching on three points. She should:
"Renounce the belief in the divinity of Jesus, the Son of Man, as He called Himself." Jesus was a simple rabbi, and so He remained. Preach Jesus Christ, but a human Jesus Christ, come to bring a certain moral code for the happiness of all men.
● change her way of looking at the Jews, rehabilitating them as the elder people, a priestly people "who was able to maintain the primitive religion in its original purity." It is a people neither deicide nor rejected by God. No curse weighs upon it. On the contrary, it is destined to proposed happiness and unity to all of humanity. "To recognize its function," writes Gerard Haddad,81 citing Benamozegh, "which Paul82 thought he could eliminate."
● Accept a reinterpretation—not a suppression— of the mystery of the Trinity.
On these three conditions, "the Catholic Church is the Church of true Catholicism," a trueCatholicism that Benamozegh names Noachism, the religion for all those who belong to the "Christian sphere," as Lustiger calls it. This Noachism83 possesses a morality that the Church is called to reveal to the peoples of the earth. The American Judeo-Episcopal Declaration of August 12, 2002, refers to it explicitly:
Judaism assumes that all people are obligated to observe a universal law. That law, spoken of as the Seven Noahide Commandments, is applicable to all human beings. These laws are: 1) the establishment of a court of justice so that law will rule in society; and the prohibitions of 2) blasphemy, 3) idolatry, 4) incest, 5) bloodshed, 6) robbery, and 7) of eating the flesh of a living animal.
The new end of the Church will be the evangelization of the nations to this Noaic humanitarianism, as well as their unification.84 The primacy of Rome will be redefined to facilitate the unity of Christians. Noachism will be "the religion of natural morality"! For in no way must the non-Jew seek to convert to Judaism or Talmudic Mosaism, a religion that is reserved for the Chosen People. Benamozegh's solution, long neglected, is now being adopted by the authorities of the Jewish world. The chief rabbi Rene Samuel Sirat, for example alluded to the status of non-Jews at the funeral of a young Frenchman of 24, victim of a terrorist attack against the cafeteria of the Hebraic University of Jerusalem, July 31, 2002:
David, my dear David, you had chosen to draw near to our Jewish community spiritually and culturally, and to claim for yourself the beautiful title of guer toshav, denoting one who is at once stranger and citizen to Judaism, such as was praised in the Bible and marvelously rendered explicit in the last century by the rabbi Elijah Benamozegh, in his book Israel and Humanity. It is a question of a free decision to draw close to the tradition of Israel, and to observe the seven laws—called the Noaic laws—of natural morality revealed long ago to Noah, father of all the living.... For is it necessary to repeat that one is not obliged to convert to Judaism in order to merit eternal salvation.85
The new religion that came from Vatican II ought to be understood in the light of the struggle-ancient, but always new—between Jesus (Mary) and Satan; the Church and the Synagogue. In the 20th century, Satan seems to have found his Trojan horse (Vatican II) full of Achaeans bent on subversive theology.
At the heart of this movement [of conversion]— and this has been taught explicitly by Christian theologians such as Louis Bouyer, Yves Congar and Henri de Lubac...86 -lies the rediscovery of faith....This is the task which the Catholic Church and many Christians want to carry out today.
Such is the conclusion drawn by Cardinal Lustiger in his second speech at the New York synagogue.87
No, your Eminence. We are Roman Catholics, and our faith is in Jesus Christ, true God and true man, born of the most pure womb of the Virgin Mary through the operation of the Holy Spirit; our faith is in Jesus Christ, Savior of man, crucified under Pontius Pilate and raised from the dead, come to fulfill the Law and the Prophets in founding the Church of Rome—Catholic and Apostolic—the new and eternal Covenant. This is not the Covenant that you are preaching. With the help of God, and with the help of the magisterium of the Church and her Tradition of 2000 years, we will not die Noaic.
This fidelity may obtain for the Jews to accept the precious graces of the Redemption-graces that the Virgin Mary is able to bestow in abundance—just as Drach, Libermann, Ratisbonne, Lemann, Zolli, and so many others have already accepted them: true converts, true sons of the Roman Church, and true sons of Mary.
God of goodness, Father of mercy, we beg You by the Immaculate Heart of Mary, through the intercession of the patriarchs and the holy Apostles, to cast Your eyes with compassion on the remains of Israel in order that they might come to know our only Savior, Jesus Christ, and that they might participate in the precious graces of the Redemption. Lord, forgive them, for they know not what they do. (Prayer indulgenced by Leo XIII and St. Pius X)
Translated exclusively by Angelus Press. For as many footnotes as possible, Angelus Press has located authorized English sources and translations, which are very important to this article. Originally published in Le Sel de la Terre. Autumn 2003, No.46. Michel Laurigan is the pseudonym of a history professor in
Francespecializing in modern Church history. He assists at the Latin Mass.
Sanhedrin 57a. Punishment for any who break the least of these satanic laws, Death by "DECAPITATION
Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
I Robert G. Pickle, of Robertsdale Alabama, Stand Firm for the witness and the testimony of the ONLY Living IAMHE, My God and my Savior, Jesus the Christ. I denounce Talmudic Jewry for it is the worship unto the Dragon. I renounce Freemasonry for they are the talmudic Jews apostate useful yid-iots unto the Dragon. I renounce the Pontifex Maximas of Sime-On Magus, I renounce Judeao-Churchinsanity the Two fold children of hell of the Talmudic Pharisees of their covenant with Death and Hell. I renounce any allegiances with this world and this earth and I am at enmity one against the other. I renounce Murder, Theft, Sorcery, Blasphemy, and ALL Liars as the anti-Christ enemies of my Lord and Savior. I renounce the Talmudic perversion and Blasphemy and the Universal Noahide Laws of satans dragon and the Treasonous Vipers in Washington DC who are controlled by the Hassidic Chabad Lubavitch. I totally reject all of Congress and the president George Walker Bush, for they are the workers of Iniquity in the scheme of their Noahide laws unto the Dragon which they will soon enslave apostate America. I deny all who follow them.
I deny the Sanhedrin and admit by free will given by Grace by the Father in heaven, they are become mine enemies for they are the anti-Christ enemy of the LORD
I am contrary unto any who deny the Lord of Host Jesus the Christ, and you are mine enemy as well as the enemy of my Lord and my Father in Heaven.
I have declared openly against the rabid rib-eyes of the synagogues of satan that they will soon be cast into outer darkness for their Blasphemies and sorceries and murders
so be it, even so, come quickly Lord Jesus the Christ My Lord
War by deception
the REDS are here
http://www.chjcc.org/organizations.htmlAgudas Chasidei Chabad
From the Certificate of Incorporation, July 25, 1940
First: The name of the corporation shall be AGUDAS CHASIDEI CHABAD OF UNITED STATES.
Second: "Agudas Chasidei Chabad" consists of the union of pious orthodox Jews whose conception of religion is piety, study, knowledge, mutual helpfulness and charity, all of which are practiced in a spirit of sincerity, cheerfulness, humbleness and modesty; with a full appreciation of and adherence to the spirit of Americanism and Democracy.
Third: The purposes for which this corporation is formed are as follows:
(a) To promote the religious, intellectual, moral and social welfare among its members and their families.
(b) To foster the spirit of Americanism among its members and families inculcating a love of Democracy and the basic principles upon which the American democracy is founded, all without any political affiliation or implication whatever.
(c) to foster the spirit of orthodox Judaism among its members and their families and among members of the Jewish faith.
(d) To establish, maintain and conduct a place of worship in accordance with the Chasidic ritual and mode of worship of the Jewish Orthodox faith, customs and traditions, for its members, their families and friends.
(e) To establish and maintain groups and study circles for the study and diffusion of the principles of Chabad Chasidism, to wit: devotion to the orthodox Jewish religion, study, learning, knowledge, mutual helpfulness and charity, all of which are to be practiced in a spirit of sincerity, cheerfulness, humbleness and modesty with a full appreciation of and adherence to the spirit of Americanism and Democracy.
(f) To support, maintain and conduct a school for the study of the Holy Law and maintain classes for the teachings of the customs and traditions of the Jewish Orthodox faith.
(g)The aforesaid mode of worship and all religious activities shall be under the jurisdiction of Rabbi Joseph Isaac Schneersohn, Chief Rabbi, of the Hierarchy of the Agudas Chasidei Chabad, and his successors.
(h) To acquire, own and maintain real and personal property to house its activities, and to provide a suitable place wherein the Chief Rabbi of the Hierarchy of the Agudas Chasidei Chabad may maintain and carry on the religious activities of said Hierarchy.
(I) To maintain branches in such states, territories, governments or countries as will be found necessary properly to carry on the work of this corporation but always subject to the laws of the States, Governments or countries in which such branches will be situated. To enroll members throughout the United States and Canada to assist in the purposes and activities hereinabove set forth.
(j) To do all things necessary to the accomplishment of the foregoing purposes and, if the Trustees shall so decide, to associate itself with persons and organizations desiring to assist in the effectuation of the purposes hereinabove set forth.
(k) This corporation shall be conducted without pecuniary profit to any individual, group or individuals or to the corporation.
Fourth: The principal office of said corporation shall be located at 770 Eastern Parkway, in the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York.
Among the signatures to this document is included the signature of the previous Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Joseph Isaac Schneersohn.
Noahide News Part 153
The Last Deception
section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"
section 16 "The Beast Has Risen"
Daniel's Seventy Weeks
Was Peter a Jew?
The Two Witnesses
"The Whore of Babylon"
Are the " Ael-ians coming"
Wall Street " The Mark" is Here
Wall Street II
Wall Street III
It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"
Declared section Part II
"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"
Qabalah Part II
Qabalah Part III
National Identification Card
ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding
A Sincere Request to "Rapture" Teachers
Compulsory Constitutional Cremation
Homeland Security, "The Police State"
"The Fourth Beast"
The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah
The Scribes of Baal
How will they do it- " The false-christ"
False Christ Part II
Baal's food Tax
"The Changing of the Guards"
"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun
"Moshiach ben Lucifer"
Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"
"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)
I Witch, New One World Order Seal
Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah
Satan's Enforcers Part 2
Satan's Enforcers Part 3
Satan's Enforcers Part 4
The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith
Pledge of Allegiance Part Two
I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ
King of the Noachides
"Beware the Mark"
"Beware the Mark" part two
"Beware the Mark" Part 3
"Beware the Mark" Part Four
"Beware the Mark" Part Five
Harvest of Fear
"Harvest of Fear" Part Two
"Harvest of Fear" Part Three
National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement
Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?
The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba
The "Lessor Jew"
Temporary Coup d' Etat
The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?
The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !
Protocols Today Part Two
Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"
Identity of the Illuminati
The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch
Chabad Satan Part 1A
Chabad Satan Part 2
Chabad Satan Part 2A
Chabad Satan Part 2B
Chabad Satan Part 3
Chabad Satan Part 3A
Chabad Satan Part 4
Chabad Satan Part 4A
Chabad Satan Part 4B
Chabad Satan Part 4C
Chabad Satan Part 5
Chabad satan Part 5A
Chabad Satan Part 5B
Chabad Satan Part 5C
Chabad Satan Part 6
Chabad Satan Part 6B
Chabad Satan Part 6C
Chabad Satan Part 6D
Chabad Satan Part 7
Chabad Satan Part 7A
Chabad Satan Part 7B
Chabad Satan Part 7C
Chabad Satan Part 8
Chabad Satan Part 8A
Chabad Satan Part 8B
Chabad Satan Part 8C
Chabad Satan Part 8D
Chabad Satan Part 9
Chabad Satan Part 9A
Chabad Satan Part 9B
Chabad Satan Part 9C
Chabad Satan Part 9D
Chabad Satan Part 10
Chabad Satan Part 10A
Chabad Satan Part 10B
Chabad Satan Part 10C
Chabad Satan Part 10D
Chabad Satan Part 11
The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction
Chabad Wall Part 2
Chabad Wall Part 3
Chabad Wall Part 4
The Chabad Phoenix is Rising
Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"
Patriot Akt II, Comrad
The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"
Satan's One World Religion
OWR Part 2
OWR Part 3
OWR Part 4
World Religion Part 5
World Religion Part 6 One
One World Religion Part 6
One WorldReligion Part 7
Re the god of Talmud Bavli
"The Raiser of Taxes"
Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764
The Final Nazi
Nazi Part 2
Nazi Part 3
Nazi Part 4
The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king
Changing the Time and the Laws
The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees
Exod-U.S the coming Geula
Who murdered Jesus the Christ
"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism
Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky
"The Two Whores"
Noahide News 2
Noahide News Part 3
Noahide News Part 4
Noahide News Part 5
Noahide News Part 6
Noahide News Part 7
Noahide News Part 8
Noahide News Part 9
Noahide News Part 10
Noahide News Part 11
Noahide News Part 12
Noahide News Part 13
Noahide News Part 14
Noahide News Part 15
Noahide News Part 16
Noahide News Part 17
Noahide News Part 18
Noahide News Part 19
Noahide News Part 20
Noahide News Part 21
Noahide News part 22
Noahide News Part 23
Noahide News part 24
Noahide News Part 25
Noahide News Part 26
Noahide News part 27
Noahide News Part 28
Noahide News Part 29
Noahide News Part 30
Noahide News Part 31
Noahide News Part 32
Noahide News Part 33
Noahide News Part 34
Noahide News Part 35
Noahide News Part 36
Noahide News Part 37
Noahide News Part 38
Noahide News Part 39
Noahide News Part 40
Noahide News Part 41
Noahide News Part 42
Noahide News Part 43
Noahide News Part 44
Noahide News Part 45
Noahide News Part 46
Noahide News Part 47
Noahide News Part 48
Noahide News Part 49
Noahide News Part 50
Noahide News Part 51
Noahide News Part 52
Noahide News Part 53
Noahide News Part 54
Noahide News Part 55
Noahide NewsPart 56
Noahide News Part 57
Noahide News Part 58
Noahide News Part 59
Noahide News Part 60
Noahide News Part 61
Noahide News Part 62
Noahide News Part 63
Noahide News Part 64
Noahide News Part 65
Noahide News Part 66
Noahide News Part 67
Noahide News Part 68
Noahide News Part 69
Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist
Noahide News Part 70
Noahide News Part 71
Noahide News Part 72
Noahide News Part 73
Noahide News Part 74
Noahide News Part 75
Noahide News Part 76
Noahide News Part 77
Noahide News Part 78
Noahide News Part 79
Noahide News Part 80
Noahide News Part 81
Noahide News Part 82
Noahide News Part 83ALERT ALERT ALERT
Noahide News Part 84
Noahide News Part 85
Noahide News Part 86
Noahide News Part 87
Noahide News Part 88
Noahide News Part 89
Noahide News part 90
Noahide News Part 91
Noahide News Part 92
Noahide News Part 93
Noahide News Part 94
Noahide News Part 95
Noahide News Part 96
Noahide News Part 97
Noahide News Part 98
Noahide News Part 99
Noahide News Part 100
Noahide News Part 101
Noahide News Part 102
Noahide News Part 103
Noahide News Part 104
Noahide News Part 105
Noahide News Part 106
Noahide News Part 107
Noahide News Part 108
Noahide News Part 109
Noahide News Part 110
Noahide News Part 111
Noahide News Part 112
Noahide News Part 113
Noahide News Part 114
Noahide Naws Part 115
Noahide News Part 116
Noahide News Part 117
Noahide News Part 118
Noahide News Part 119
Noahide News Part 120
Noahide News Part 121
Noahide News Part 122
Noahide News Part 123
Noahide News Part 124
Noahide News part 125
Noahide News Part 126
Noahide News Part 127
Noahide News Part 128
Noahide News Part 129
The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father
Noahide News Part 130
Noahide news Part 131
Noahide News Part 132
Noahide News Part 133
Noahide News Part 134
Noahide News Part 135
Noahide news Part 136
Noahide News Part 137
Noahide News Part 138
Noahide News Part 139
Noahide News Part 140
Noahide News Part 141
Noahide News Part 142
Noahide News Part 143
Noahide News Part 144
Noahide news Part 147
Noahide News Part 148
Noahide News Part 149
Noahide News Part 150
Noahide News Part 151
Noahide News Part 152
Noahide News Part 153