Part V


Appendix A


Unveiling Satan's Deception

A Word Study from the Scriptures

Phineas Rhinehart

The word listed in the Greek of the Strong's Lexicon* under number 2453 having been translated J-e-w by the early translators causes more confusion than any other word in the Bible.  The word J-e-w (plural J-e-w-s) is so translated in the New Testament some 187 times in the majority of our English translations.  The word J-e-w, however, is a generic or made-up term that should not be in the Bible at all, and I shall prove that fact in this study.

The word (Strong's 2453), in its original languages, means that one is either from the one tribe of Judah or that one is a resident of Judea.  And a resident of Judea might be a person of any race or religion.  One would simply have to live in the area of Judea to be a Judean.  A true Judahite would have to be born from the seed-line of the Patriarch Judah, just as the Lord Jesus Christ was.

If the early translators had transliterated Strong's 2453, that is, if they had exchanged each letter of the Greek word into its equivalent English letter, the word would have looked like this: Ioudaios, which is eight letters, not three like J-e-w.  Many words have simply been transliterated in the Bible, causing their actual meanings to be confused.  Such is Strong's Greek word number 32, angelos.  Number 32 is transliterated into the English as angel.  The word angel, however, gives us no information as to the actual meaning of the word.  The word means messenger.  The messenger can be from God—or from Satan.  And too, the messenger can be a human one.  John the Baptiser is called a messenger (Strong's 32) by Jesus in Matthew 11.10.  And Paul calls himself a messenger (Strong's 32) from God in Galatians 4.14.  II Corinthians 11.7 mentions a messenger (Strong's 32) sent by Satan.  The shameful transliteration of angelos (Strong's 32) has caused much of the mysticism regarding Divine Messengers.  With the following examples we shall prove the inconsistencies which translators have made in translating and transliterating words in our Bibles.  Remember, a consistent method is essential for a good translation.  Linguists call such a translation a concordant one.  Take the English word Hebrew or Hebrews (Strong's 1445). The transliteration is as follows for the singular and plural:

                                 Singular     Plural

Transliteration:       Hebraios     Hebraioi

English Bibles:        Hebrew       Hebrews

Take the word Israel (Strg. 2474) and Israelite (Strg. 2475):

Transliteration:       Israel       Israelites

English Bibles:        Israel       Israelite

Another clear case of pure transliteration is found in the word Judea (Strg. 2449):

Transliteration:       Ioudaia

English Bibles:       Judaea or Judea

Yet notice what translators have done with the word Ioudaios (Strg. 2453), which means either Judahite or Judean, according to its particular context:    

                                     Singular   Plural

Greek Transliteration:  Ioudaios   Ioudaioi

English Bibles:            Jew           Jews

Translators have taken it upon themselves to translate or transliterate at their leisure, aiding Satan's great deception by convincing people that those who today call themselves "Jews" are actually of the same seed-line as the Lord Jesus Christ.  But what should we think of the people who claim to be Israelites, yet do not accept Jesus as God and Saviour of the Universe?  Should we believe their claims?  The Apostle John settles that question for us in 1 John 2.22-23:

A liar is one who denies that Jesus is the Christ.  The liar—the one who denies the Father and the Son—has the character of the Antichrist! 2.23. Everyone who denies the Son cannot have the Father.  The one who acknowledges the Son also has the Father!

When studying the Scriptures, the above verses should be a foundation stone concerning what and whom we believe.  And when commentators and translators disregard these verses by taking the word of "liars," such as the ones who claim descent from the tribes of Israel, yet reject Christ—and are indeed His most virulent adversaries—we must reject the places in their commentaries and translations where they have believed these "liars"!

The Gist of What Happened

Over the centuries the ever-evolving English language, has added letters and spellings that have varied greatly since the Authorised Version of the King James Bible appeared in 1611.  At that time Strg. 2453 was spelled Iewe (plural Iewes) instead of J-e-w or J-e-w-s.  The Lord's name was spelled Iesus instead of Jesus.  John was Iohn; the river Jordan was Iordane; Judea was Iudea.  (Obviously the English letter J was not in use at the time.)  And spellings of other words have changed too.  For example, the words up and upon were spelled vp and vpon; the word dove was doue; Thessalonians was Theffalonians; delusion was delufion; strange was ftrange; even was euen; believe was beleeue; Jehoshaphat was Iehofhaphat.  Translators neither translated Strong's Greek number 2453 nor transliterated it.  The word J-e-w (which evolved over the centuries into its modern spelling) translators placed into the Bible because a people exist who call themselves by that name—and they claim that the word encompasses all twelve tribes of Israel.  But where is the Scriptural authority to make the word J-e-w a synonymous term for all the tribes of Israel?  Obviously, no Scriptural authority exists which gives us the right to use the word J-e-w as an all-encompassing term for all the seed-line of Israel.

But you might think that the doctrine came from one of the people who called himself an Israelite.  He was an early “historian,” and he was not a Christian.  In fact he was a Pharisee!  His name was Josephus.  And he began the false doctrine which claims that the one word that means either Judahite or Judean should be used for all twelve tribes of Israel (Josephus, Ant. xi, 5-6), today translated/interpreted J-e-w.  And although Jesus, John, Luke, and Paul always make a sharp distinction between Israel and the Judean scribes and Pharisees “who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets (I Thessalonians 2.15),” traditional Christendom has accepted Josephus’s word without questioning it in the least.   And this fact remains true even though some scholars such as McClintock and Strong have noted that the word originally covered only the tribe of Judah, and that it was Josephus who invented the idea of having the word cover all the tribes (pg. 905 Vol. IV, McClintock & Strong Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, & Ecclesiastical Literature).

So the Hebrew and Greek word can neither be properly translated nor transliterated into the word today spelled J-e-w.  It is a deception and Yet, although the Apostle John clearly warned us that "anyone who does not accept Jesus as the Christ is a liar," most translators, commentators, Bible historians, preachers, and traditional Christians believe the people who make the claim that the word J-e-w is a term which does indeed encompass all the tribes!

Our conclusion is that we should never use the word J-e-w except when quoting someone who has used it!  And then we are better off calling it the "J-word."  For it is unquestionably a major part of Satan's deception, and none of us should aid him in it!  What Satan managed to do with the J-word was rather ingenious to say the least.  He realised that he could not have the word transliterated, which according to consistency would also properly translate it into Judean or Judahite.  If his translators had done that, the average Bible students' antennae would have immediately shot up!  They would have asked, If one is from the tribe of Judah and the other simply a resident of Judea, then who and where are the other eleven tribes?  So Satan invented a generic term for the world of Judeo-Christianity to use, where the word “Jew” has thus so easily slithered into our English translations.


And how can translators reconcile translating the verb Ioudaidzo (Strg. 2450) with "to live as do the Jews," as the King James translators did in Galatians 2.14?  The verb Ioudaidzo (Strg. 2450) means "to take up the laws of the Judean Scribes and Pharisees."  And when the word is transliterated into the English word Judaize by later translators, we might ask how they can transliterate Ioudaidzo (Strg. 2450) in Galatians 2.14, and in the same verse translate Ioudaios (Strg. 2453) with the word J-e-w!  A consistent translation requires both words either to be translated or transliterated.  

The following is what several historians, linguists, and religious authors have to say about "Judaism" and its origins and who the people are today who call themselvesJ-e-w-s”:

"Judaism was not evolved from Judah; it was in Babylon that Judaism first became that which it was and still is."  The authors conclude that, "The distinction between Israel and Judah can best be expressed in the phrase, which may sound paradoxical, but yet aptly characterises the true relationship of the two people: The Israelites were not Jews!"  (Harmsworth, History Of The World. Vol. 1, 781-4)

“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or Hebrew.” (Jewish Almanac, 1980)

The Absurdity of It

The absurdity of using the generic term J-e-w instead of Judahite or Judean, to represent collectively both those born from the tribe of Judah and those who are residents of Judea is easily seen in the following example: The Greek word translated J-e-w in most Bibles is Ioudaios (which is derived from Strg. Greek 2455, Ioudas, English Judah).  And the main Hebrew word is Yehudiy, Strg. Hebrew 3064 (which is derived from Strg. Hebrew 3063, Yehudah, English Judah).  Both base words are the terms for the patron of the tribe of Judah.  But instead of being called Judahites, we are to believe that Judah's offspring are J-e-w-s. If that translation is proper, then in order to be consistent, the offspring of the tribe of Ephraim, instead of becoming Ephraimites, should become Eews!  Benjamin's offspring should be known as Bews instead of Benjamites!  Instead of Levites, Levi's offspring should become Lews!  Simeon's children would become Sews instead of Simeonites!  And Zebulunites would become Zews!  Make any sense?  Well, that is exactly that which has taken place in our English Bibles.

Yet, as ridiculous as it would be to call a Benjamite a "Bew," it is no more ridiculous than the fact that most translators, commentators, and Bible historians tell us that the word J-e-w circumscribes all twelve tribes!  We might also ask why Judah (Strg. Hebrew 3063), which is first used in Genesis 29.35, is not translated J-e-w.  If his offspring are to be J-e-w-s, then it should follow that his name would have been J-e-w.  But if that had been done, Satan could not have used the word J-e-w to represent all twelve tribes!  Every Bible student would have known that the word J-e-w represented only one tribe; and then Satan would have had to invent another word to represent all twelve tribes.

Straightening Out the Mess

Below are the Scriptures where Strg. 2453 is used in the N.T.  It is properly translated with the words Judahite or Judean.  Remember! A Judahite is a person who is a member of the one tribe of Judah by birth.  Therefore, when the word Judean is used, it simply means that one is a resident of Judea or is from the land of Judea, and the word has absolutely no implication as to what race the person is.

Most of the time, however, the people addressed in the Bible as Judeans are not true Judahites!  That is, they are not actually from any of the tribes of Israel by birth.  They are an admixture of most all the races, just as Luke tells us in Acts 2.5 & 10-22 where he informs us that there are people among the Judeans from “every race under the sky.”

Take the time to go through the Bible that you read the most and scratch through the word J-e-w or J-e-w-s, and replace it with either Judahite or Judean!  Do it and you will extinguish Satan's fiery darts of confusion.  Read your Bible in this light and see the difference and note the clarity and constant flow of thought.

Matthew: The word in the following verses should be translated Judahites: 2.2; 27.11; 27.29; 27.37.  In this one verse it should be Judeans: 28.15.

Mark: Judahites in 7.3; 15.2,9,12,18,26.

Luke: Judahites in 7.3; 23.3,37,38,51.

John: Judean in 5.1; 7.2; 11.55.  Judeans in these verses except where the word is used more than one time in a particular verse and then the proper translation is thus set off in parenthesis: 1.19; 2.6,13,18,20; 3.25; 4.9 (twice in this order: Judean & Judeans); 5.10,15,16,18; 6.41,52; 7.1,11, 13,15,35; 8.22,31,48,52,57; 9.18,22 (Judeans twice); 10.19,24,31, 10.33; 11.8,54; 12.9; 13.33; 18.12,14,20,31,36,38; 19.7,12,14,20,21  (three times in this order: Judeans, Judahites, & Judahites), 19.31, 19.38, 19.42, 20.19.

Judahite in John 18.35.

Judahites in 3.1; 4.22 (The proper translation of the last phrase of this verse is "because Salvation originates from the Judahites"; the phrase refers to Christ who came from the tribe of Judah), 6.4; 11.19,31,33,36,45; 12.11; 18.33,39, 19.3,19,40.

Acts: Judean in 13.6; 19.14; 24.24 (it is feminine here, but Judean is fine), 24.27.

Judeans in 2.5,10; 9.22,23; 10.39; 12.3,11; 13.45,50; 14.2,4,5,19; 16.3; 17.1,5,10,13,17; 18.5,12, 18.14 (twice); 19.13,33; 20.3,19; 21.11,27; 22.30; 23.12,20,27,30; 24.9,18; 25.2,7,8,9,10,15,24; 26.2,3,4,7,21; 28.19.

Judahite in 10.28; 16.1 (feminine), 18.2 (twice, Judahite & Judeans), 18.24; 19.34; 22.3. 

Judahites in 13.5,42,43; 14.1 (twice); 16.28; 18.4,19,28; 19.10, 17; 20.21; 21.21; 22.12; 24.5; 28.17,29.

In Acts 10.22, in the King James Bible the phrase "among all the nation of Jews" should be translated "all the races among the Judeans."  This phrase without a doubt proves that there were many races of people among the Judeans.  In Acts 21.39 Judahite.  In Romans 11.1 Paul tells us he is from the tribe of Benjamin, and then see I Corinthians 9.20 where he states that he "became as a Judahite to please the Judeans, in order to benefit the Judahites." 

Romans: Judahite in 1.16; 2.9,10,16,28,29; 3.1; 10.12.

Judahites in 3.9,29; 9.24.

I Corinthians: Judeans in 1.22; 10.32.  Judahites in 1.23; 12.13.

In I Corinthians 9.20 the verse should read, "And I became as a Judahite to the Judeans, that I might benefit Judahites."

II Corinthians: Judeans in 11.24.  By beginning to read where the subject starts at II Cor. 11.19, it is obvious that in this verse Paul did not accept the people whom he called Judeans as either Israelites or Hebrews.

Galatians: Judeans in Galatians 2.13.  Judahite in 3.28.  Judahites in 2.15.  In 2.14 the word is used three times in this order: Judahite, Judeans, & Judeans.

Colossians: Judahite in 3.11.

I Thessalonians: Judeans in 2.14.  This is one of the most important verses in the Scriptures, informing us as to who killed our Lord, the Prophets, and what their fate is.  Read it and think of what the future brings for these hybrid offspring of Satan.  And rejoice!

I Thessalonians 2.14-16:

For you, brothers, became imitators of the Ever-Living’s Assemblies at Judea, those who are in union with Christ Jesus, because you certainly suffered the same persecutions by your own people, just as they certainly suffered persecutions by the Judeans, who indeed killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and brutally persecute us.  Certainly God is displeased with them.  And being hostile toward all mankind, so as to fill their sins to the limit at all times, they try to stop us from telling the races that they can be saved.  But God’s wrath will come on them at the end!

Revelation: Judahites in 2.9 & 3.9.

The Old Testament

In the Old Testament it is better to use Judean (singular) and Judeans (plural) in every place that Strg. Hebrew 3062, 3064, and 3066 are used, because when the Hebrew wants to specify that people are from the tribe of Judah it will use a phrase such as "the men of Judah," which, for example, is found in Jeremiah 43.9. There are only a couple of exceptions, and they’re marked. Below are the Scriptures where you should place either Judean or Judeans:

II Kings: 16.6; 18.26,28; 25.25.

II Chronicles: 32.18.

Ezra: 4.12,23; 5.1,5; 6.7,8,14.

Nehemiah: 1.2; 2.16; 4.1,2,12; 5.17.

5.1,8;  6.6;  13.23,24: Judahites.

Esther: 2.5; 3.4,6,10,13; 4.3,7,13,14,16; 5.13; 6.10,13, 8.1,3,5,7,8,9,11, 13,16,17, 9.1,2,3,5,6,10,12,13,15,16,18,19,20,22, 23,24,25,27,28,29,30,31; 10.3.

Isaiah: 36.11,13.

Jeremiah: 32.12; 34.9; 38.19; 40.11,12,15; 41.3; 44.1; 52.28,30.

Daniel: 3.8,12.

Zechariah: 8.23.


The lesson we should learn from this study is that we must all search the Scriptures regularly and prayerfully, allowing our Lord's Spirit to guide us—never receiving a tradition as truth!  Thus we must follow the orders which the Lord gave to the Judean Scribes and Pharisees in John 5.39: Search the Scriptures, because you think them to contain ever-existing life.  Indeed, they testify about Me!  The Judahites at Berea did just that very thing when Paul and Silas presented the Message to them in Acts 17.  Notice their actions in the following passage:

Acts 17.10-11 So the brothers at once sent both Paul and Silas to Berea during the night, and after their arrival they went into the Judean synagogue.  But these were racially pure—not like those at Thessalonika!  So they accepted the Message, being in an impassioned state concerning It—daily examining the Scriptures in order to verify the teachings.

Follow the examples set forth for us in the Scriptures.  Never use the J-word except when quoting someone!  Never receive anything as truth from anyone who does not accept Jesus as the Christ!  Never accept anything about the Scriptures from people who believe anything that the "liars" claim.  Then, the Ever-Living will gush forth blessings upon your Spirit—for the ageless ages! As stated above, make the following Scriptures your foundation for deciding whether you can believe someone or whether you must doubt all he says:

True Definition of a Liar

2.22.  A liar is the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ!  The liar—the one who denies the Father and the Son—has the character of the Antichrist!

2.23.   Everyone who denies the Son cannot have the Father.  The one who acknowledges the Son also has the Father!

If people meet the requirements in the above Scriptures, then give them the benefit of not doubting them.  If they do not, doubt them immediately regardless of from whom they may claim descent!

*Strong’s Lexicon: In this study, I have used the numbering system set up by James Strong in his 19th century lexicon and concordance.  This numbering system allows English readers to look up and study both Hebrew and Greek words which they could not otherwise find because of the language difference.  Strong’s is not, however, to be used to translate, for as a rule it gives only general definitions.  Proper translation can only be carried out by specific methods, by the study of words and phrases in their specific and general contexts, by the study of the particular author and his normal usage of the word or phrase, by the word or phrase’s extra biblical usage, and etc.



·    A SEMITE (or "Shemite") is someone descended from Shem, one of the sons of Noah.

·    A HEBREW (or "Eber") is someone descended from Heber one of the great-grandsons of Shem. So all Hebrews are Semites, but not all Semites are Hebrews.


Six generations after Heber, Abraham was born to his line, so Abraham was both a Hebrew and a Semite, born of the line of Heber and Shem.  Isaac was born of Abraham, then Jacob of Isaac. Jacob's name was changed to "Israel," and he fathered 12 sons. His sons and their descendants are called Israelites, and they would be both Semitic and Hebrew.  Many non-Israelites were called “Jews” (Judahites, Judeans) simply because they lived in Judah or claimed to follow the religion of the Judeans.  The self-styled or so-called "Jews" of Judaism today are not, nor ever have been Israelites, Hebrews or Semites but rather Chazars (Turkish Mongol Huns).  There is a veritable mountain of evidence, even from Jewish sources that clearly confirms the Jews non-Semitic heritage.


"Thus, at this juncture of time the Edomites 'were incorporated with the Jewish nation, and their country was called by the Greeks and Romans 'Idumea' (Mark 3:8; Ptolemy, 'Geography,' v. 16)." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. V. (1904), p. 41).

"...the Idumeans (Edomites) were...made Jews...and a Turkish people (Chazars) were mainly Jews in South Russia...The main part of Jewry never was in Judea and had never come out of Judea." (H.G. Wells, The Outline of History, 3rd ed., MacMillian, 1921, p. 494


New York Times article Reveals that European-Descended Jews are Counterfeits and have no Blood line to Abraham!

The fact that most of those who call themselves Jews are not Jews (Rev. 2:9) and have no claim to the lands of Palestine because they have no genetic relation to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob can no longer be suppressed. The October 29, 1996 N.Y. Times, in an article entitled, "Scholars Debate Origins of Yiddish and the Migrations of Jews," states:

"Arching over these questions is the central mystery of just where the Jews of Eastern Europe came from. Many historians believe that there were not nearly enough Jews in Western Europe to account for the huge population that later flourished in Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine and nearby areas.

"By reconstructing the Yiddish mother tongue, linguists hope to plot the migration of the Jews and their language with a precision never possible before.

"It has even been suggested, on the basis of linguistic evidence, that the Jews of Eastern Europe were not predominantly part of the Diaspora from the Middle East, but were members of another ethnic group that adopted Judaism.

"...One linguist has recently argued that Yiddish began as a Slavic language that was 'relexified,' with most of its vocabulary replaced with German words.

"...Even more troublesome are demographic studies indicating that during the Middle Ages there were no more than 25,000 to 35,000 Jews in Western Europe. These figures are hard to reconcile with other studies showing that by the 17th century there were hundreds of thousands of Jews in Eastern Europe.

"...Some scholars believe the roots of Yiddish, and even the Ashkenazi people themselves, lie much farther east. In his 1976 book, “The Thirteenth Tribe,”  Arthur Koestler made the startling suggestion, never taken seriously by linguists, that the Eastern European Jews were not really Semitic -- that they were largely descended from the Turkish Chazars, who converted en masse to Judaism in medieval times.

"More recently, Koestler's controversial thesis has been revived and expanded in a 1993 book, The Ashkenazic 'Jews': A Slavo-Turkic People in Search of a Jewish Identity (Slavica Publishers), by Dr. Paul Wexler, a Tel Aviv University linguist.

"Wexler uses a reconstruction of Yiddish to argue that it began as a Slavic language whose vocabulary was largely replaced with German words. Going even further, he contends that the AshkeNAZI Jews are predominantly converted Slavs and Turks who merged with a tiny population of Palestinian Jews from the Diaspora."


Do the Jews of today fit the Description of Antichrist?

These are the 4 verses in the Bible containing the word "antichrist."

1st John 2:18
”Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.”
Antichrists, - Plural, More than a singular antichrist!

1st John 2:22
”Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.”
Do the Jews of today deny the Son of GOD?
Answer: - Yes!

1st John 4:3
”And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.”
Do the Jews deny that Christ, the Messiah, has come in the flesh?
Answer:- Yes!
2nd John 1:7
”For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess (acknowledge) not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.”
Do the Jews acknowledge that Jesus Christ, Jesus Messiah or the Messiah, has come in the flesh?
Answer:- No!

All the apostles were expecting the return of Jesus Christ in a relatively short time period. From their letters you can see they thought it would occur in the lifetime of most of their readers.  They therefore expected the antichrist even sooner!! The description of the antichrist in John's letters describe a person or people already present in the world AT THAT TIME!

The foremost opposition to the Gospel in the days of the Apostles are the same group which are the main opposition to Jesus Christ today.

Jewish Hatred Against Jesus Christ

Was there an organized Jewish conspiracy against the life and ministry of our Saviour - the Lord Jesus Christ?

Let the Scriptures speak for themselves!


". . . of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sin alway: For the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost."

I Thessalonians 2:14-16


In the earthly life and ministry of our Lord, He encountered much opposition as He travelled throughout the ancient land of Palestine in doing the work that His Father sent Him to do. During the first century the land of Palestine where Jesus lived and ministered was divided into three Roman provinces. They were Galilee to the north where Jesus lived as a child and began His ministry; Samaria located in central Palestine where He ministered to the woman at the well in John chapter 4; and Judea to the south where He encountered most of His opposition from the leadership of the Jewish nation and was eventually illegally tried, falsely convicted and crucified as a result of the scheming efforts of the Jews and their manipulation of the Roman civil authorities.

In the Gospel of John the Apostle records the masterful discourse of Jesus that He gave concerning His equality with God and His manifestation as being the living bread sent down from heaven (chapters 5-6). After giving this discourse and seeing the open anger of the Jews in response to His message, He left Judea where Jewish Pharisaism was in total control, and returned to Galilee, which offered Him more personal safety. John records:

"After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: For He would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill Him."

(7:1, 11:53-54)

The Jewish leadership, which included Scribes, Pharisees, Sadducees, Chief Priests and the Sanhedrin heckled and taunted the Lord Jesus as He conducted His teaching and healing ministry among the people. Their purpose was to catch Him in heresy and blasphemy and eventually use it as evidence against Him at His trial (Luke 20:19-26).

"... of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sin alway: For the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost."

I Thessalonians 2:14-16

Reasons Why the Jews Crucified Jesus

1.     He claimed Kingship - John 18:33-37; John 19:12-22

2.     Telling the truth - Luke 4:21-29, John 8:40

3.     Healing on the Sabbath - Matthew 12:9-14, John 5:16

4.     Envy - Matthew 27:18, Mark 15:10

  1. Blasphemy - (A) Forgiving sins - Matthew 9:1-3, Mark 2:1-7 (B) Claiming equality with God - Matthew 26:59-66, Mark 14:61-64, John 10:25-33; 19:7

Jewish Accusations Against Jesus Christ
Genesis 3:15

  1. Keeper of bad company - Matthew 9:10-11
  2. Of poor, common-stock - Mark 6:3
  3. Labourer - Mark 6:3
  4. Possessed of Beelzebub - Mark 3:22
  5. From the wrong neighbourhood - John 7:41, 52
  6. A deceiver and hypocrite - John 7:10-13
  7. Unlearned - John 7:14-15
  8. Had a persecution complex - John 7:20
  9. Demon possessed--full of the devil - John 7:20, 10:20, 8:48, 52
  10. Provoker to anger - John 7:23
  11. A divider of the people - John 7:43
  12. Unpopular, not recommended by rulers, unrecognised by leaders - John 7:45-49 (v. 48)
  13. False prophet - John 7:50-52
  14. Liar, falsifier - John 8:13
  15. A bastard - John 8:19
  16. Had suicidal tendencies - John 8:22
  17. A half-breed - John 8:48
  18. Dishonourable - John 8:49
  19. Boaster, false representative of God, impostor, self-made man - John 8:53
  20. Ungodly, or cometh not from God - John 9:13-16
  21. A sinner - John 9:13-16
  22. Crazy, insane - John 10:20
  23. Perplexing, causing doubt - John 10:22-24
  24. A blasphemer - John 10:31-33

The Jews Killed Jesus Christ
(v. 18, I Thessalonians 2:14-15)

Jewish Hatred and Murder Attempts
on the Life of Jesus Christ

1.     Matthew 2:16 - As a child Herod tried to kill Him.

2.     Matthew 12:14, Mark 3:6 - Pharisees held a council with the Herodians to discuss destroying Jesus because He healed a man on the Sabbath day.

3.     Luke 4:28-30 - Attempted to throw Him off the hill because of His sermon.

4.     John 5:16 - The Jews persecuted Jesus and sought to kill Him for healing the impotent man on the Sabbath day.

5.     John 5:18 - Jews sought to kill Jesus because He claimed equality with God.

6.     John 7:30-32 - The Jewish plot to arrest Jesus with intent to kill Him for claiming He was from God.

7.     John 7:25 - It was common knowledge that the Jews sought to kill Jesus.

8.     John 7:40-44 - Some people desired to arrest Jesus with intent to kill Him.

9.     John 8:59 - Jews attempted to kill Jesus by stoning Him for claiming that He was God.

10. John 10:31 - The Jews again attempt to kill Jesus by stoning for claiming His Deity.

11. John 10:39 - The Jews sought to take Jesus for proving His Deity.

12. John 11:47 - The chief priests and Pharisees plot against Jesus.

13. John 11:53-54 - The Jews make a determined effort to kill Jesus.

14. John 11:55-57 - The Jews sought Jesus even at the Passover Feast.

15. John 12:9-11 - The Jews even desire to kill Lazarus because of their hatred for Jesus.

16. John 18:3, 10, 12 - Jesus was arrested by Jewish soldiers.

17. John 18:13-14 - Jesus was tried by Jewish leaders who had already decided on his guilt.

18. John 18:36 - Jesus acknowledges that it was the Jews who would kill Him.

19. John 18:38-40, 19:1-7, 12-15 - The Jews are adamant in their desire to kill Jesus.

20. John 19:11 - Jesus acknowledges a lesser and a greater sin in those who condemned Him to death.

21. John 19:16-18 - The Jews led Jesus away to be crucified.

The Talmud

The Talmud is a vast literary work written by Jewish Rabbis that contains civil and religious law. It is not a part of the inspired sacred Scripture. The Palestinian Talmud was written in the 3rd century AD, while the Babylonian Talmud was written around 500 AD. It contains discussions concerning every aspect of Jewish life and thought. The Talmud was written by Jewish Rabbis who were men of 'perverse minds and destitute of the truth'.

Concerning the names of Jesus,
the Talmud refers to Him as:

  1. Immach Schemo Vezikro which means, "May His name and memory be blotted out."
  2. Otho Isch = "That man"
  3. Peloni = "A certain one"
  4. Naggar Bar Naggar = "The carpenter son of a carpenter"
  5. Ben Charsch etaim = "The son of a wood worker"
  6. Talui = "The one who was hanged"

Concerning Christ Himself,
the Talmud accuses Him of being:

  1. Illegitimate
  2. Possessed by the soul of Esau and being Esau himself.
  3. A fool and insane
  4. A conjurer and a magician
  5. An idolater
  6. A seducer
  7. Crucified For His crimes
  8. Buried in Hell
  9. Wrongfully worshipped
  10. An idol

The Talmud condemns the teaching
of Christ as follows:

  1. Falsehood
  2. Heresy
  3. Impossible to observe

Taken from "The Talmud Unmasked" By Rev. I.B. Pranaitis 1892 pp28-41  "Mr. Freedman publishes the Talmud's description of the birth and death of Christ as follows: 'Jesus is referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier. Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation. Hanged on the eve of Passover, seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel. Died like a beast and buried in animal's dirt heap.' Taken from Defender's Magazine October 1957, which quoted Freedman's "Facts are Facts".

The innocence of Christ was declared by:

  1. Pilate's wife - Matthew 27:19
  2. Judas Iscariot - Matthew 27:4
  3. Pilate - Matthew 27:24; Luke 23:22; John 19:6
  4. Thief on the cross - Luke 23:41
  5. Roman soldiers - Mark 15:39

For Fear of the Jews

John 7:13; 9:22; 12:42; 19:38; 20:19;Acts 13:5


Commentary on the Book of Jude

Phineas Rhinehart


The Lord's half brother, Jude, whose actual Israelite name is Yuda, has written an importunate letter for Christians of all eras.  Rather than consoling us about the Lord's saving works, he is urgently warning us about the impostors who live among us, eat with us, work along side us, marry into our families, rule over us in our government and courts, and always claim to be on our side - yet are really our mortal enemies.
Just as Jude was, almost all the early Christians were Israelites or Judahites, as were all the original Apostles; and it is the true House of Israel that brought the world the Christ-Message, and a small remnant continues doing so today.  That remnant listens to God's warnings, while the rest of the true House of Israel sleeps a deep sleep that their enemy placed on them through 2000 years of  brainwashing.  It shall remain thus until the Lord's Return!

Jude informs us quickly that these impostors reject the Lord Jesus as the Sovereign God and Saviour.  That's the first indication of who these impostors are.  So now ask yourself, Which race is famous for that?

Toward Jude's goal of writing an importunate warning, he has left us with a powerful and informative letter - one that should make all believers sit up and take a more thorough view of their surroundings.

Most of the Christian world, however, has not paid any attention to these warnings, and so, worship the Christ-haters instead of the Christ.  Most Christians today are content to accept their particular denominations' modified form of salivation (and with it all its ritual stipulations), and willingly ignore the hundreds of warnings about their common enemy - and so because of that, don't even recognize who their enemy is.

Jude has left us many keys and tip-offs as to exactly who these impostors are.  One we find in the word I've translated "impious," a word Jude uses a total of six times in his short letter.  It has the equivalent meaning to a Hebrew word used way back in Deuteronomy, and it means in that context someone who knows there's a God, yet has no respect or regard for Him or His teachings.

God uses the word in that sense when informing Moses what He's going to do to our people because of their lack of faith in Him and their desertion from Him.  Succinctly, He says He's going to turn this impious race loose on us as our punishment - He will make them powerful and us powerless.  

Don't think that hasn't happened.  For no matter what part of the world you live in these impostors control most of your government, its laws, it court decisions, and its foreign policies.  They control the value of your money through the Federal Reserve Bank.  They also strongly affect the ways your ministers teach about Christ and Who He is, because most of our people believe their blasphemous claim that they come from the same genetic seed-line as Moses, Jakob, king David, our Lord, and all the Divine Couriers!

Don't let any preacher or any person tell you that He's taken that curse of punishment off of us in "this age of grace" - by means of the Cross or otherwise!  He's not retracted that punishment!  For it is grace to us that God is punishing us. God punishes only those He loves!

But irrespective of how this punishment affects us and our lives and the people and world around us, it is our duty to take the Scriptural warnings regarding these impostors seriously, and not allow them to pull us away from our true heritage and from our Lord and God, Jesus Christ.  

So take note of every trait that Jude tells you about these beasts, for they are wily and subtle in their deceit, and we need all the help we can get to stay clear of their slanderous lies and satanic doctrines.

Notice what the Lord says to Moses concerning what He will do to our people for their apostasies; and notice His use of the word I've translated "impious":

Deuteronomy 32.20-21:
20. And the Ever-Living exclaimed: "I shall hide My face from them - I shall see how they windup - For they are *a corrupt race - sons who have no faith!

21. They provoked Me with a counterfeit god - They made Me furious with their vanities - So then I shall provoke them with a counterfeit race! I shall make them furious by means of an impious race.
*a corrupt race with no faith!: This is what God says about our people! Notice the definite difference between the two races mentioned here - one is corrupt and has no faith in their Redeemer even though He's shown them much favour; the other knows He exists, yet has no respect or regard for Him, which is exactly like their progenitors Satan and Kain.  The former race He still loves and thus punishes; the latter race He has no feeling for and only uses them as whips on the backs of His people.

*a counterfeit race/an impious race: Notice the two words modifying the word race: they are counterfeit (fakes) in the sense that they claim to be a race that they are not; and they are impious because they have no respect for our God - they work night and day trying to pervert every good thing He's done.

These are the same impious impostors who during the Lord's time went by the titles Pharisees, Sadducees, Scribes, and Scripture Lawyers, and who persecuted the Lord at every turn, eventually murdered Him, then continued their evil work by terrorizing the Divine Couriers and eventually murdered all of them.  Today they continue to be the race that causes divisions among our people, just as Jude informs us in verse 19.

Jude's message is that they live among us today!  They haven't gone anywhere!  They're still here among us as you read!  And although he does not say to rid ourselves of them, we are still to beware of them - to realize who they are, and to avoid following their evil teachings.  To do that you must know them, their teachings, and their character traits.

As a last point on exactly who these people are, Jude notes in verse four that these impostors deny the Lord Jesus - so as you read this letter ask yourself, What one singular race is both adamant about denying the Lord and is also famous for it?

The following is a fresh translation from the most recent edition of the Majority Text.

Jude's Letter to the Called, Separated, and Preserved

Jude, a slave belonging to Jesus Christ, and a brother of James, to those called out, separated by God our Father, and preserved by Jesus Christ:

2. Compassion, peace, and love be increased to you!

Purpose of the Letter
3. Loved-Ones, having been in the process of making every effort to write to you about the common salvation, I received a need to write to you urging you to fight diligently for the faith which has been delivered once and for all to the Separated-Ones.

4. For certain people have sneaked in among you, the ones who were written about long ago for the purpose of the following condemnation: impious people attempting to pervert the grace granted to us by the Ever-Living into unrestrained lawlessness - even denying the only Sovereign-Lord God, indeed our Lord Jesus Christ.  

Three Examples from the Old Testament Serve as Warnings
5. Now I want to remind you, your having once understood the following things: that the Lord delivered a people out of the land of Egypt; secondly, He destroyed those not believing.

6. And also those fallen-angels who did not stay in their realm of rule, but on the contrary, having deserted their own residence, He has held them under darkness in eternal chains, for the purpose of punishing them on the Great Day He returns.

7. In a similar manner to the fallen-angels, just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them indulged in unnatural passions - even having chased after the same sex - they are displayed before all as a fiery, ever-existing warning. They are undergoing a judicial sentence.

The Three Sins of the Impious
8. In spite of these warnings, in the same way these self-deluders also certainly defile the flesh, and reject our authority, and slander honourable Christians.

How Michael Handles Satan
9. But Michael the archangel, when disputing with the devil - he argued about the body of Moses - he dared not bring a slanderous verdict against him, but instead, said: "The Lord rebuke you!"

The Impious Understand the Physical Not the Spiritual
10. But what things they do not comprehend, they slander.  And what things they understand physically - like unreasoning animals - they are corrupted by these things.

Doom to and of the Impious
11. Extreme anguish to them, because they travelled the way Kain went, and poured themselves out to the same deceit Balaam committed for money, and perished at the rebellion Korah led against Moses!

Jude's Graphic Description of the Impostors
12. These people are hidden reefs dining with you in your love-feasts, irreverently gorging themselves. They are empty clouds blown about by various winds. They are late-autumn trees - barren, doubly decayed, plucked up by their roots.
13. They are wild sea waves foaming up their shameful deeds. They are wandering stars for whom the darkest blackness has been preserved for a certain age.

The Previously Predicted Doom of the Impious
14. And Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these too, declaring, "Pay attention: the Lord is coming with His separated myriads, to carry out judgment upon everyone,
15. and to convict all the impious people for all of their impious deeds which they impiously committed, and for all the harsh things the impious sinners spoke against Him."

Further Description of the Impious
16. These people are complainers, faultfinders, walking according  to their own lusts.  Also, their mouth speaks arrogant words, faking flatteries on you for gain.

Orders to Keep Previous Warnings in Mind
17. But you, loved ones, keep in mind the teachings which were foretold by the Couriers sent by our Lord Jesus Christ, because they continually informed you of the following:
18. that in the last period scoffers will exist, walking according to their own impious lusts.    

Final Description of the Deceivers
19. These people are the ones who cause divisions - animals - not having a soul.

Jude's Final Orders to Christians
20.  But you, loved ones, edifying yourselves by means of your separated faith, praying in a separated spirit, you must keep yourselves in union with the love which comes from God,
21. eagerly awaiting the compassion which comes from our Lord Jesus Christ and that carries us into ever-existing life.

It's Your Decision Whom to Show Mercy Upon
22. So indeed have compassion upon some, distinguishing for yourselves which ones.
23. And respectfully deliver others, snatching them out of the fire, hating even the garment which has been stained by the carnal.

The Doxology
24. Now to Him having the ability to keep us from stumbling, and to stand us unblemished  in a state of jubilation before His Glorious Face;
25.   to the only wise God - Who is our Saviour: Honour and Majesty, Sovereignty and Authority, certainly at this time and for all the ages!  Amen.

Note: All underlined words are emphatic in the original, yet are impossible to express in the receiver language, English, unless they're underlined.  All titles I've placed in to help you follow the subject and are not in the original.

All italicised words and phrases the translator has added for clarity or because English demands them. Opposite to English, Greek is an economical language that quite often leaves out linking verbs, objects, articles, and personal pronouns; but they must be added in English to convey the proper meaning of the original text and to allow you to read them in the common English idiom.

The text used for the New Testament is the Second Edition of the Majority Text, edited by Hodges and Farstad.  The Text for all Old Testament Translations is the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, a reproduction of the St. Petersburg Codex B19a, which I consider the oldest and one of the best Hebrew texts.

Appendix B

World Jewish Zionism today, constitutes the last blatant racist ideology still surviving, with the state of Israel the last outpost of real "Apartheid" in the World.  Israel constitutes by its mere existence a complete defiance to all international laws, rules and principles, and the open racism manifested in the Jewish State is a clear violation of all decent ethics and morals known to Man. The so-called "Holy Land" has been a nation by default, scourged by blood and fire ever since the degenerate politics of Pharisaic Judaism first blazed its bloody trail in 1948. There has been no peace and can be no peace in that ravaged land, openly founded upon the racist subjugation of three million men, women and children, dismissed as mere . . "human cattle." (Ed)

The State Of Mind

By Israel Shamir


I...took the train homewards, to Jaffa. The train carried a few Africans, probably illegal immigrants judging by their shy looks. A Romanian building team was gulping beer and burping loudly. They were imported from their impoverished East European land to build the houses for immigrants, as the Jews do not want to be employed in construction in Israel as well as in California. A Jewish Israeli lawyer in black yarmulke leafed papers in his semi-opened briefcase. A blond and armed Israeli soldier talked Ukrainian with its fricative h's to his corpulent girlfriend. He extolled his own heroic fight against the multitude of Arab terrorists under her admiring eyes. A group of Moroccans discussed the closure of Acre steel plant and their slim chances to find another job. The crisis is deepening, one of them said - it is as bad as in 1966.

The train rode through Haifa, and I thought of hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of Americans, Jews and Christian Zionists, who lobby, pray, support and pay - no, not for the Jewish state built on the ruins of Palestine. It would be bad enough; but reality is worse. I thought of millions of Palestinians, rotting in refugee camps and jails, dispossessed, expelled - not by the monster of evil occupation and land grabbing, but by something worse - by a ghost.

The Jewish state is a virtual state that quickly loses all remaining connection to reality. This ghost of a state kills people and collects money in America; it continues some nefarious existence, like the legal term, "estate of the deceased". Its fields are worked by imported guest workers, guarded by imported Russians and Ethiopians, explained by Israeli professors teaching forever in American universities and by brave generals on the lookout for a big shake. Unemployment grows daily, vital services are on strike; the tourist industry has collapsed, hotels are boarded up and other branches of national economy are close to collapse. Israelis buy flats in Florida and Prague, while houses in Israel could not be sold. Sharon's desire to punish Palestinians was similar to punishing one's own left hand: Palestinians and Israelis are intertwined and integrated, and this separation kills the economy of both.

From far away America, Israel looks like a giant, a nuclear state, a great friend of the United States, a Jewish state that is a source of pride for American Jews. A visitor leaves our shores with a strong feeling of our identity and prosperity. Only we, permanent residents, know that it is a cardboard sham. Israel is collapsing, as its active citizens emigrate in despair, while generals complete the destruction of the country. A cruel fate befalls the native Palestinians: a ghost kills them, a spiritless body walking in Zombie-like trance the corridors of the Congress and the deserts of the Middle East.

For the sake of this spectre, important American Jews squeeze every penny from their employees and countrymen, cut down on pensions to the old, no assistance for children, reduce the health and education budget, dry up help to starving Africa and Latin America, build improbable coalitions with notorious racists of Pat Robertson's kind, demand the wholesale destruction of Iraq, bless the bombing of Afghani refugees, keep Afro-Americans in their ghettos, undermine their host society, making enemies of themselves and to America. These deeds are vile enough, but they are useless as well. The Zionist experiment has practically collapsed. It can run for many years to come on a life-supporting machine as a brain-dead vegetable. It can kill people, maybe even start a world war. It cannot become alive.

The Jewish state of Israel is a state of mind; it is but a projection of the American Jewish mind. Worries and problems it articulates are American Jewish problems. For Israeli "Jews", there is no need of segregation, of war, of subjugation of natives. We eat no bagels with lox, speak no Yiddish, read no Saul Bellow or Sholom Aleichem, and avoid synagogues. We prefer Arab food and Greek music. My neighbourhood has seven pork butchers to a kosher one. Forty per cent of Tel Aviv weddings are done outside the Jewish framework: young Israelis prefer to go to Cyprus to get married, just to avoid contact with Rabbis. Tel Aviv is the gays' capital of the Middle East, though according to Jewish law, gays should be exterminated. If American Jews would not bribe Israelis on a large scale, we would just forget about the Diaspora and dissolve into the hospitable Middle East. If they continue to bankroll us, we shall oblige them with a small show of Jewishness.

We are master-sellers of illusion, and as long as there are buyers, we shall provide. In 1946, a group of dedicated men from all over the world came to Palestine under the aegis of the UN. They were sent to prepare the ground for the partition of the land. Among other places, they came to the southernmost kibbutz Revivim in the arid Negev, and came across a wonderful flowerbed with roses, anemones, and violets in front of the kibbutz office. In their report, the members of the delegation expressed their amazement and stated, "Jews make the desert bloom, let them have Negev."

As they left, the kibbutz youngsters went out and pulled the flowers out of the sand: they had bought fresh flowers the same morning on the Jaffa market and had planted them as props for the duration of the visit. This small outlay transferred Negev with its two hundred thousand Palestinians to the Jewish state. The Majority of them were expelled across the newly drawn border, to the camps of Gaza or Jordan. It was cruel and useless: even now, fifty years later, Negev south of Beersheba has a smaller population than in 1948.

In order to populate depopulated lands, Mossad broke and terrorised the Jewish communities of North Africa. The Jews were brought in, sprayed with DDT lice-killer and placed into refugee camps that soon became towns of Netivot, Dimona, Yerucham. They are still there, in the towns of unemployment and misery, drawing social benefits and probably disliking Ashkenazi Jews as much as anybody could. Not in vain, they write "Ashkenazim to Auschwitz" on the walls of their towns.

A few weeks before the Intifadah, Israeli establishment imprisoned a hugely popular leader of Oriental Jews, Rabbi Arie Deri. Tens of thousands of Moroccans gathered at the gates of the jail demanding his release. Intifada saved the skins of Ashkenazi Jews from the civil war, but not forever.

Thus the conjuring tricks of Revivim, conquest of Negev, expulsion of Palestinians, destruction of Moroccan Jewish community succeeded separately and failed altogether. Zionist leaders dreamed to make Palestine as Jewish as England is English. They failed. Palestine is Jewish as Jamaica is English.

The land of Palestine is being ruined now, in front of our eyes. Its beautiful old villages are bombed to oblivion; churches are emptied of their flock; olives are uprooted. Such ruin did not befall the land since the Assyrian invasion 2700 years ago. Nothing could comfort us in the face of this great destruction, and certainly the people connected to it - whether Israeli killers or their American Jewish supporters - will be damned forever.

Still, a wry irony of history will remain as a footnote in the books of the future: the Jewish leadership committed these crimes in vain, and received no profit out of it. Even if the last Palestinian would be crucified on the hill of Golgotha, even that would not bring to life the virtual Jewish state of Israel.

Israel Shamir is an Israeli writer and journalist living in Jaffa. His other articles could be found on his site,


Appendix C

Israel: A Christian Perspective

By Kathleen Kern (now taken down)

Tikkun, March/April 1998

I am a Christian who came to Israel with a deep awareness--instilled by my parents and my academic background--of the horrific abuses the Church has inflicted on Jews for two millennia.

In the winter and spring of 1995, under the auspices of my organization, Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT), I visited with numerous Israelis and Palestinians involved in peace and human rights work. After meeting with grassroots organizers in the West Bank city of Hebron, we received an invitation from the mayor's office to set up a project there.

I knew before the project started in June 1995 that my knowledge of the history of Christian anti-Semitism would be both a burden and a tool. On the whole, my knowledge has been a useful tool that has helped our team in Hebron establish warm relationships with dozens of Israeli peace and human rights activists. It has helped us connect Israelis with Palestinians who are facing home demolition and ongoing harassment from Israeli soldiers and settlers. To do our work, our team has had to open ourselves to the pain and suffering that begat the pain and suffering that begat the pain and suffering ad infinitum.

But at the moment, I only feel the "burden" part. I am tired and sick at heart from what I have seen over the last two years, and I have done almost nothing for the last three days besides deal with the fallout from death threats that some Kachnik--probably at the behest of the Hebron settlers--has made against my co-workers there.

When I first sent Tikkun my reflection piece on Israel at fifty, I tried to convey my ambivalence--how I juggle my relationships with Israelis and Palestinians, my evangelical/fundamentalist upbringing, the realities of what I see, and the historical context that gave rise to Zionism.

You, Michael Lerner, told me it came across as emotionally detached.

So you want to know how I really feel about Israel after having worked for nearly seventeen months as a human rights activist in Hebron? You don't want the sion that I give in presentations to Mennonite Churches that emphasize our conflict resolution work? You don't want the version I give Jewish friends to avoid seeing that veil of pain drop across their faces? You don't want the version that I tell the children in my household so they won't grow up thinking Israelis are bad people?

Are you so sure you want to open those doors that my rage has strained against for the past two years? Are you? Well here it goes. Israel makes me want to throw things at a wall until the plaster shatters and my arms are too sore to hurl anything else. Israel makes me wish that my theology permitted me a purgatory where folks like Ariel Sharon would have to experience every bit of the pain and terror they have inflicted on their victims over the last decades. Israel makes me want to point my finger, like Emile Zola, like the prophet Nathan, at Netanyahu and his cronies, and say: "J'accuse--You are the man," as silent wraiths heap corpses of ewe lambs, slaughtered on the altar of Israeli expansionism, at his feet. God! Do you have any idea what you are asking of me, when you say you want something less detached? I have expended enormous energy to subdue my passion so that I don't repulse those who are only moderately interested in my work. I walk on eggshells so that I do not detonate the passion of others who are too involved with the conflict.

Much of what I have witnessed, I can report only with detachment: I have seen a man with his hands and feet blown off, skin boiled red, thrashing about like a seal. I have seen men picking up little bits of people stuck to asphalt, walls, and trees in Jerusalem. I have seen Israeli soldiers in Hebron beckon settlers to come over and spit on terrified young men they have detained at a checkpoint. I have seen the huge grin on the face of a man holding me up by the hair with his left hand as he drew the other hand back to punch me in the ear. From the ground I watched him run away with my camera held over his head like a football, surrounded by other settlers in white shirts and black pants. They laughed and cheered as though he had made a touch down. I have been called "Nazi"; I have been spat at times too numerous to mention. I have on many occasions had Miriam Levinger cackle at me, "Don't say I didn't warn you."

I have listened as countless soldiers and settlers who have never had a civil conversation with a Palestinian--let alone eaten with them, lived with them, babysat for them as I have--tell me all about what Arabs "are like." I have heard Israeli soldiers tell me, "you have seen nothing," when I confront them about physically abusing young Palestinian men they had detained against the wall across from our apartment. I have stood one too many times in front of tearful Palestinian women asking me "Laish? Why? Why? WHY are they doing this? What have we done?" as they nursed the bruises of their children who had been attacked by soldiers or settlers. I have listened to their sobs and wails as bulldozers plowed into their houses while Israeli soldiers laughed and cheered. My bile, my tears, well up as I write. Before I went to Hebron I lived under the illusion that houses and human bodies were solid. I didn't know they could come apart so easily.

It is better to detach. It is better to think of myself as a biological organism, made up of a finite amount of fluids, because otherwise I think my tears, my vomit, would drown the Fertile Crescent.

The year before I joined CPT, I finished a book, We Are the Pharisees, in which I examined ways the Church has used Jesus' diatribes against the Pharisees as anti-Semitic propaganda. I wrote "... until we understand our horrible history of persecuting the Jews, we cannot really talk with [Jews] on issues surrounding the state of Israel and Israeli-Palestinian relationships. Some of my friends have expressed impatience with the way Jews "use" their past persecutions in order to justify Israeli policies. I believe this is the wrong approach. As long as we refuse to listen to the Jews regarding their history, the Jews have every right to refuse to listen to us. We need to understand why Jews throughout the world crave the security that came with the founding of the State of Israel." I received my author's copies a week before I flew to Israel for the first time. As I re-read my words today, I ask myself, "Do I still believe them? Do I still believe anything I believed before the Israeli-Palestinian conflict infected me?" I am able to rise above my rage long enough to realize that, yes, my words still hold true. Even given my experiences in Hebron, I don't think there is much I would add or change.

As a Christian white European American I want to take responsibility for the injustices in the Middle East. If I can take responsibility for what has happened, that gives me a small measure of control, right? The silence roils in my stomach. I will continue. I still believe I have an obligation to follow Jesus' command that I love my enemies. Can I love Mr. Shektman, Miriam Levinger, and the anonymous Kachniks currently threatening the lives of my friends in Hebron? Yes, I can love them. They were not born hateful. I know--no, I am certain--that God loves them.

Israeli friends have told me that W.B. Yeats' "The Second Coming" has become especially meaningful to them to them in the last few years--"things fall apart; the centre cannot hold."

The lines from that poem that leap out at me are, "the best lack all conviction, while the worst/Are full of passionate intensity." Is that what you meant, when you said you wanted less detachment and more passion? Because there has to be some emotional force that matches those who vociferously defend their right to treat others with contempt? What if the passion only adds to the cumulative rage mushrooming in the region? What if it makes me lose control and betray the principles of non-violence to which I have committed my life? What if my detachment is the only thing holding me together?


Appendix D

What Christians Don’t Know About Israel

By Grace Halsell

American Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S.policy?

President Bush as well as most members of Congress support Israel and they know why.  U.S. Jews sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers. .

The answer to achieving an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere-among those who support Israel but don’t really know why.

This group is the vast majority of Americans. They are well-meaning, fair- minded Christians who feel bond ed to Israel-and Zionism-often from atavistic feelings, in some cases dating from childhood. I am one of those. I grew up listening to stories of a mystical, allegorical, spiritual Israel. This was before a modern political entity with the same name appeared on our maps. I attended Sunday School and watched an instructor draw down window- type shades to show maps of the Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a Good and Chosen people who fought against their Bad “unchosen” enemies.

In my early 20s, I began travelling the world, earning my living as a writer. I came to the subject of the Middle East rather late in my career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge regarding the area. About all I knew was what I had learned in Sunday School.

And typical of many U.S. Christians, I somehow considered a modern state created in 1948 as a homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as a replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard about as a child.

When in 1979 I initially went to Jerusalem, I planned to write about the three great monotheistic religions and leave out politics. “Not write about politics?” scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a water pipe in the Old Walled City. “We eat politics, morning, noon and night!”

As I would learn, the politics is about land, and the co-claimants to that land: the indigenous Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000 years and the Jews who started arriving in large numbers after the Second World War. By living among Israeli Jews as well as Palestinian Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard, smelled, experienced the police state tactics Israelis use against Palestinians.

My research led to a book entitled Journey to Jerusalem. My journey not only was enlightening to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own country. I say sadder understanding because I began to see that, in Middle East politics, we the people are not making the decisions, but rather that supporters of Israel are doing so. And typical of most Americans, I tended to think the U.S. media was “free” to print news impartially.

“It shouldn’t be published. It’s anti-Israel.” In the late 1970s, when I first went to Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could and would classify “news” depending on who was doing what to whom.

On my initial visit to Israel-Palestine, I had interviewed dozens of young Palestinian men. About one in four related stories of torture. Israeli police had come in the night, dragged them from their beds and placed hoods over their heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant noises, hung them upside down and had sadistically mutilated their genitals.

I had not read such stories in the U.S. media. Wasn’t it news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors simply didn’t know it was happening.

On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had been brutally tortured. And I’d make them available to him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter had been lost. I wrote again.

In time I began to realize what I hadn’t known: had it been Jews who were strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews with tortured Arabs were “lost” at WETA.

The process of getting my book Journey to Jerusalem published also was a learning experience. Bill Griffin, who signed a contract with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing Company, was a former Roman Catholic priest. He assured me that no one other than himself would edit the book. As I researched the book, making several trips to Israel and Palestine, I met frequently with Griffin, showing him sample chapters. ”Terrific,” he said of my material.

The day the book was scheduled to be published, I went to visit MacMillan’s. Checking in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across a room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary Margie came to greet me. In tears, she whispered for me to meet her in the ladies room. When we were alone, she confided, “He’s been fired.” She indicated it was because he had signed a contract for a book that was sympathetic to Palestinians. Griffin, she said, had no time to see me.

Later, I met with another MacMillan official, William Curry. “I was told to take your manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them read it for mistakes,” he told me. “They were not pleased. They asked me, ‘You are not going to publish this book, are you?’ I asked, ‘Were there mistakes?’ ‘Not mistakes as such. But it shouldn’t be published. It’s anti-Israel.”

Somehow, despite obstacles to prevent it, the presses had started rolling. After its publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a number of churches. Christians generally reacted with disbelief. Back then, there was little or no coverage of Israeli land confiscation, demolition of Palestinian homes, wanton arrests and torture of Palestinian civilians.

The Same Question

Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard the same question, “How come I didn’t know this?” Or someone might ask, “But I haven’t read about that in my newspaper.” To these church audiences, I related my own learning experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S. correspondents covering a relatively tiny state. I pointed out that I had not seen so many reporters in world capitals such as Beijing, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris.

Why, I asked, did a small state with a 1980 population of only four million warrant more reporters than China, with a billion people?

I also linked this query with my findings that The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post-and most of our nation’s print media-are owned and/or controlled by Jews supportive of Israel. It was for this reason, I deduced, that they sent so many reporters to cover Israel-and to do so largely from the Israeli point of view.

My learning experiences also included coming to realize how easily I could lose a Jewish friend if I criticized the Jewish state. I could with impunity criticize France, England, Russia, even the United States. And any aspect of life in America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more Jewish friends than one after the publication of Journey to Jerusalem-all sad losses for me and one, perhaps, saddest of all.

In the 1960s and 1970s, before going to the Middle East, I had written about the plight of blacks in a book entitled Soul Sister, and the plight of American Indians in a book entitled Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The Illegals.

These books had come to the attention of the “mother” of The New York Times, Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger. Her father had started the newspaper, then her husband ran it, and in the years that I knew her, her son was the publisher. She invited me to her fashionable apartment on Fifth Avenue for lunches and dinner parties. And, on many occasions, I was a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn. home.

She was liberal-minded and praised my efforts to speak for the underdog, even going so far in one letter to say, “You are the most remarkable woman I ever knew.” I had little concept that from being buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I discovered-from her point of view-the “wrong” underdog.

As it happened, I was a weekend guest in her spacious Connecticut home when she read bound galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was leaving, she handed the galleys back with a saddened look: “My dear, have you forgotten the Holocaust?” She felt that what happened in Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier should silence any criticism of the Jewish state. She could focus on a holocaust of Jews while negating a modern day holocaust of Palestinians.

I realized, quite painfully, that our friendship was ending. Iphigene Sulzberger had not only invited me to her home to meet her famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The Times had requested articles. I wrote op-ed articles on various subjects including American blacks, American Indians as well as undocumented workers. Since Mrs.Sulzberger and other Jewish officials at the Times highly praised my efforts to help these groups of oppressed peoples, the dichotomy became apparent: most “liberal” U.S. Jews stand on the side of all poor and oppressed peoples save one-the Palestinians.

How handily these liberal Jewish opinion-moulders tend to diminish the Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to categorize them all as “terrorists.” Interestingly, Iphigene Sulzberger had talked to me a great deal about her father, Adolph S. Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the early Zionists. He had not favoured the creation of a Jewish state.

Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen victim to Zionism, a nationalistic movement that passes for many as a religion. While the ethical instructions of all great religions-including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and Christ, stress that all human beings are equal, militant Zionists take the position that the killing of a non-Jew does not count.

Over five decades now, Zionists have killed Palestinians with impunity. And in the 1996 shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the Israelis killed more than 100 civilians sheltered there. As an Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit, explains of the massacre, “We believe with absolute certitude that right now, with the White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and The New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not count the same way as our own.”

Israelis today, explains the anti-Zionist Jew Israel Shahak, “are not basing their religion on the ethics of justice. They do not accept the Old Testament as it is written. Rather, religious Jews turn to the Talmud. For them, the Talmudic Jewish laws become ‘the Bible.’ And the Talmud teaches that a Jew can kill a non-Jew with impunity.”

In the teachings of Christ, there was a break from such Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal the wounded, to comfort the downtrodden. The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is that having made an icon of Israel, we fall into a trap of condoning whatever Israel does-even wanton murder-as orchestrated by God.

Yet, I am not alone in suggesting that the churches in the United States represent the last major organized support for Palestinian rights. This imperative is due in part to our historic links to the Land of Christ and in part to the moral issues involved with having our tax dollars fund Israeli-government-approved violations of human rights.

While Israel and its dedicated U.S. Jewish supporters know they have the president and most of Congress in their hands, they worry about grassroots America- the well-meaning Christians who care for justice.

Thus far, most Christians were unaware of what it was they didn’t know about Israel. They were indoctrinated by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own country and when they travelled to the Land of Christ most all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being the case, it was unlikely a Christian ever met a Palestinian or learned what caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

This is gradually changing, however. And this change disturbs the Israelis. As an example, delegates attending a Christian Sabeel said they were harassed by Israeli security at the Tel Aviv airport.

“They asked us,” said one delegate, “Why did you use a Palestinian travel agency? Why didn’t you use an Israeli agency?” Obviously, said one delegate, “The Israelis have a policy to discourage us from visiting the Holy Land except under their sponsorship. They don’t want Christians to start learning all they have never known about Israel.”

Grace Halsell is a Washington, DC-based writer. She is the author of 14 books, including Journey to Jerusalem and Prophecy and Politics. The Jerusalem Times (Jerusalem). This news item is distributed via Middle East News Online



Appendix E

I Want to Say Something

Sunday, May 19 2002 @ 02:28 AM GMT

By Jeff Kingham

After nearly two weeks in this so-called Holy Land, senses and skill of analysis begin to fail me, confounded as they are by disbelief and indignation.

The conditions under which the Palestinians have been forced and are continuing to endure are nothing short of barbaric; I know this from personal observation ... from continuing evictions across the street from my hotel in East Jerusalem to persistent, arbitrary harassment in every Israeli-controlled zone, from the shocking brutality of Ramallah and Jenin to, worst of all, the institutionalised outrage against humanity known as the Gaza Strip. Despite the unreality of their condition, the Palestinian people remain without exception the warmest, most unselfish, friendly people I have ever met, never knowing who I am or why I am here. Their resilience and generosity opens channels within me and others who came here with me through which unfamiliar emotions rise like vapours from a bottle of ether broken deep within heart and mind.

Last week I returned from Jenin, where I had been with a few other internationals. It was a site of unconscionable, inconceivable barbarism. Thousands upon thousands of homes destroyed, housing for at least 15,000 reduced to nothing more than concrete powder -- a bitter, painful dust replete with unexploded bombs and missiles and shreds of personal belongings and corpses. Between 1 and 5 people, mostly children in Jenin had been losing limbs or worse daily. Were it anywhere else in the Western world, this monstrous scene of devastation and human misery would have long ago drawn official political and rescue responses from world governments; but it seems clear that the international community already made the shameful decision to cast off the Palestinians. While I helped in Jenin to distribute food and identify and mark unexploded bombs, the sole official international efforts in Jenin consisted of a small slowly assembling United Nations team and another small group of Norwegian and British search and rescue experts.

Hardly any Western media, the bastion of democracy and the free press were evident, save for BBC and a handful of others. What an outrage! There were no international dignitaries touring the site of this war crime (save one Scottish parliamentarian, come to Palestine of his own accord) and absolutely no other international expert teams made available to direct search and relief efforts. Where in the world could these sorts of teams, routinely mobilized by Western nations as good will and humanitarian gestures, have been more useful than in Jenin? Where were they? Where are they? Where will they be after the next Israeli outrage? Many dozens, and maybe more Palestinians remain buried beneath dust and rubble, bombs and belongings.

While these neglected victims of unconscionable aggression were all certainly dead bodies by then, after more than a week beneath the rubble, expert international teams were disturbingly obvious in their absence. Were they in Jenin, search and rescue experts would have saved the lives and limbs of desperate family members clawing through what remained to be exhumed of former lives, looking for answers about missing family members, or trying to retrieve some important possession in the great Palestinian tomb that is now Jenin.

Now, however, weeks after the carnage, the great work in Jenin is not saving, but remembering making sure the world never forgets what happened there.

Gaza, in most ways, is even more shocking, for the outrages here are status quo. The Gaza strip is an Israeli-constructed prison for 1.3 million Palestinians which the world community ignores by international convention. It is a concentration camp divided up into three cell blocks and several isolation cells where the men, women, and children of this bitter slice of Palestine wile away lives, cut off from trade, opportunity, freedom, and the world; it is a prison, nothing more. Israel controls the economy within and without the Strip Gazans are literally forced by the barrel of American-made guns, the turret of American-made tanks, the missile launchers of American-made Apache helicopters and F16s to be the unwilling consumers of Israeli trade and commercial products.

The innocent prisoners of this Israeli-built, Israeli-guarded penitentiary breathe every breath, eat every meal, sleep every night, and wake up every day hemmed in by electric fences and security walls, houses, buildings and infrastructure destroyed in Israeli raids, refugee camps that are the most densely populated places on earth, a small strip of Israeli-patrolled shoreline, checkpoints that are really arbitrarily deadly harassment centres, Israeli settlements that are really thinly disguised fronts for heavy concentrations of IDF forces, etc, etc., etc. Gazans, however, somehow manage to struggle on.

To me, as a foreigner in Gaza, hope would seem a state of mind with no bearing here. Many Gazans, nevertheless, continue to draw their meagre portions from a closely guarded well of hope.

Though no one I have met in the cities and camps of Gaza has actually read the works of Franz Kafka, a new word has gained currency in the lexicon of Palestinian Arabic. Palestinians of the Strip in particular have come to refer to their plight and condition as Kafkaesque; nowhere perhaps has this label ever more appropriate. On my return I think I will look into Arabic translations of The Castle and The Trial for shipment to Gaza. I think perchance that with the works of Kafka in hand, Gaza will soon produce the world's most renowned Kafka scholars, living as they do the unreality and absurdity of institutionalised alienation and dispossession.

Jeff Kingham, is one member of the International Solidarity Movement who stormed the Church of the Nativity with food, he was arrested and has been deported back to the United States.


Appendix F

History of Jewish Ritual Murder

By Willie Martin

(Edited from Mr. Martin's series on Communism)

Jew Watch - Willie Martin's Web Site

For the purpose of brevity, the following is a heavily edited expose’ on Jewish Ritual Murder. A Talmudic sanctioned ritual which is being conductedin our day, just as it has for centuries.

Jewish Ritual Murder: On May 1, 1989, the Oprah Winfrey show had as its guest a person who, as a young girl, was forced to participate in a ritual in which a Christian infant was sacrificed. The amazing thing about this guest is that she was not affiliated with some unknown radical blood letting cult, but simply that She Was A Jew.  According to an article on the show in the "Chicago Tribune," the woman was "undergoing long-term psychiatric treatment," apparently because of the horrific nature of her experience. The newspaper article is quoted below in its entirety.

Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale On Oprah Show

Chicago Tribune, 5/7/89

New York Times News Service

 "Hundreds of television viewers and the leaders of several Jewish and civil liberties organizations have protested allegations on a popular talk show last week that some Jews practice ritual killing of children. The allegations were made by a guest using the pseudonym ‘Rachel’ on 'The Oprah Winfrey Show,' a widely viewed syndicated talk show. During the program, broadcast Monday, Winfrey introduced the guest as someone who was undergoing long-term treatment for a multiple personality disorder. The woman told Winfrey that she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of children and had been a victim of ritualistic abuse herself.

 The guest also said of such practices: 'there's other Jewish families across the country - it's not just my family.' The assertions were made during a program that focused on the cult murders of at least 13 people whose bodies were found last month near Matamoros, Mexico. The woman's comments provoked hundreds of angry phone calls and letters from Jewish and civil liberties groups, spokesmen for the groups said in interviews late last week. Jeffrey Jacobs, the chief operating officer of Winfrey's production company, Harpo Productions Inc., denied Winfrey had acted irresponsibly in broadcasting the interview since she had emphasized on the show that the guest spoke only for herself. He added that Winfrey and her producers would meet with representatives of the Jewish and civil liberties groups next week in Chicago, where the show is taped. Winfrey was travelling Friday, Jacobs said, and was unavailable for comment. Early in the interview Winfrey said, 'This is the first time I have heard of any Jewish people sacrificing babies, but anyway -- so you witnessed the sacrifice?

  The woman responded: 'Right. When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that, and which I had to sacrifice an infant.' The guest was repeatedly identified by Winfrey as being Jewish. At one point, the woman asserted that (Jewish) ritual sacrifices occurred in other Jewish families around the country and that they were known to the Police." (end of article)

 Although all Jews are aware of the blood rite and its importance to the Jewish cult, only the most important Jewish leaders, the rabbis and the wealthiest members of the Jewish community, are allowed to participate in the blood-drinking rite. Kastein states, on page 173, that the ordinary Jews are forbidden to participate in the rite. One reason for this is the fact that the practice of ritual murder is ‘fraught with danger’ for the entire Jewish Community if discovered.

 Most uprisings against the Jews during the past two thousand years have stemmed from the discovery of this practice, and the resulting attempts of the non-Jews to punish the Jews for murdering non-Jewish children. The principal reason that this crime is so often discovered, is that the naked, pierced body of the child, once it has been drained of blood, must be thrown on a trash heap.   The Jewish rite forbids burial of the body, even though this would conceal all evidence of their crime. The Talmud, the Holy Book of the Jews, defines all non-Jews as beasts, and by Jewish law, the burial of beasts is forbidden. Therefore, the Jews try to conceal their crime by throwing the corpse of the murdered child down an abandoned well, where it may not be discovered, or by hiding it in some manner, which will not constitute burial.

 In many cases, the body is discovered, and then the Jews either are attacked by the non-Jews, or they spend thousands of dollars bribing witnesses and officials, and attempting to frame some gentile as a "sex murderer." Bribery and intimidation of public officials and newspapermen is always the first step in this campaign. In the United States, since many of these are Jews, no bribery is necessary, as every Jew knows that it is his first duty to conceal the evidence of ritual murder. It is also customary for the Jews to pay off the murdered child's parents with a large sum of money, which in many cases means that they will not prosecute.

 Could Jewish Ritual Murder Still Exist? At one time or another the Jews have been expelled from every country in Europe. And in almost every case it was over the charge of Ritual Murder.  The accusation was that during the Jewish feasts of Purim and/or Passover, extremist Hassidic Orthodox Jewish sects would sacrifice a Christian youth for their blood. It was then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes or bread for eating in order for the Jews to gain atonement in the eyes of their god. It is possible that Purim blood might sometimes have been held over for the Passover.

 The History Of Jewish Human Sacrifice: The ancient Khazar Jews along with others of that Near East era, followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet. The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned alive. In the pre-Christian era, the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown out their screams. The Carthaginians also were worshippers of Baal and sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in Syracuse in 310 B.C., history records  that the sons of 500 nobles were cast into a fiery pit, or Tophet, from a scaffold shaped in the likeness of their god Baal.

 In recent Excavations at Gezer, the archaeologist R.A.S. Macalister notes that the bodies of sacrificed young children are found in every stratum of Jewish remains from the earliest times. Photographs of the children's bodies are published in Macalister's book, although the book itself, like most works, which attest to the criminal nature of the Jews, is now almost unobtainable. It is classified as a rare book, and most rare book dealers are Jews.

 In the Bible, Isaiah 57:3-5 the prophet, talking of the Jews of his day says: "But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer and the whore. Against whom do ye sport yourselves? Against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? Are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood, Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of the rocks?"

 By the phrase, "ye sons of the sorceress," Isaiah calls attention to the fact that Jewish ritual murder is a black magic rite. It is customary for the rabbi, as he drinks blood, to invoke the presence of Satan, who will then presumably carry out the wishes of the Jews. The drinkers of blood also swear eternal obedience to Satan during the blood rite. Isaiah also calls attention to the fact that here the children are slain "under the cleft of the rocks." This refers to the Jewish ban against burying the slain gentile child, and to hiding the body in the rocks in the hopes that the gentiles will not discover their crime.

 The Jewish Encyclopaedia, Vol. VIII, page 653, published in 1904, says, "The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that in the last days of the kingdom, human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh (Yahu, or Jehovah), as King of Counsellor of the Nation, and that the Prophets disapproved of it."

 Yahu also is interchangeable with Baal, the Golden Idol, and Satan, who is thought to have been a minor god of the Jews, and an instrument of Baal. The two themes of Jewish history are blood and gold, and every practice of the Jews is inextricably bound up with these two factors.

 One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great detail by Arnold S. Leese, entitled "My Irrelevant Defence on Jewish Ritual Murder," London, 1938. Addressing the issue of sacrifices, Mr. Leese states: "Let a Jew speak for us here: 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated (Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1904, Vol. VII, p. 650) to be 'without any religious convictions.' wrote what he himself described as 'an impartial study of the history and sociology of the Jews.' calling his book L'Antisemitisme; in the 1904 edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder: 'To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified, against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the people as the magician par excellence; one finds many formulae of exorcism in the Talmud, and the Talmudic and Cabbalistic demonology is very complicated. Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great importance.  Now, it is very probable, even certain that Jewish magicians sacrificed children; hence the origin of the legend of ritual sacrifice.  Thus Lazare tries to absolve the Jews of the ritual murder charge by saying that they were guilty, but that it was done from motives of sorcery, rather than as a key element in the practice of the Jewish religion. He apparently has not read the Bible, or noted Isaiah's denunciations of the Jews as sorcerers and murderers of children. Of course the Jews killed children during their rites of sorcery, as Lazare admits, but these horrors were committed as essential rites of the Jewish religion.

 Dr. Eric Bischoff, a famous German Jewish scholar, has found the explicit authorization of the practice of Jewish ritual murder in the Thikunne Zohar, Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book of cabbalistic ritual, as follows: "Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the lawful (Jewish) method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the (Jews) high god (Satan)."

 Murders of Christian children by the Jews usually occur during the important feast-days, Purim, one month before Easter, and Passover, at Easter. Jewish law prescribes that the gentile victim at Purim, a Jewish holiday as the Jewish victory over the gentiles, may be an adult. Also if no gentile victim can be obtained, dried blood from a previous victim may be used.  However, a Jewish law is quite specific that the victim at Passover must be a White Child (as the Whites are the True Israelites, and the Jews know this) under seven years of age, who must be bled white, crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and finally given the last blow by being wounded in the side, the dagger prescribed to be in the hands of a rabbi, in a complete re-enactment of the crucifixion of Christ.  This incredible, vindictive ceremony reassures the Jews that even if a few of the gentiles are alerted to the true nature of this scourge, as Christ so clearly railed against them, the Jews will always win out by murdering the critic. Consequently, many critics of the Jews are slain in these terrible ceremonies.

In the United States, perhaps the most famous victim of Jewish ritual murder was the son of Charles Lindbergh, which occurred on March 1, 1932, during the time of the annual Jewish celebration.  Lindbergh's son was chosen because Lindbergh himself was the most logical person to lead the gentiles against the Jews. His son was slain as a warning to him to decline this service. Lindberg's father, a Congressman, had led the fight against Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb Co., when Warburg succeeded in getting a subservient Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act. The elder Lindbergh had published a book, which was burned by Federal agents during World War I, even though he was a Congressman at the time. He was well aware of the nature of the Jewish power problem. Now that his son was world-famous, after his feat of flying solo across the Atlantic, the Jews feared that he might be persuaded to lead a gentile revolt against their power.

 They had already planned World War II, in which Germany was to be the sacrificial victim, and now they brought in an almost illiterate German, Gerhart Hauptmann, and convicted him of the killing. Symbolically, Hauptmann, like Christ, was also a carpenter, a profession that made him a logical victim for the Jews.   Hauptmann's defence was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired him to do some carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills, which proved to be from the Lindbergh ransom money. Although the existence of Fisch was proven, he could not be located during the trial. The court was like the one which had convicted Jesus, for it only accepted evidence which the Jews allowed to be presented.

 In reality, of course, one cannot believe anything which is accepted as evidence in an American court, due to the facility of the Jews for manufacturing evidence and due to the prevalence of Jewish lawyers and judges in all American court rooms. This was also the first of many efforts of the Jews to vilify the Germans so that America would be more easily deceived into fighting a Jew's war.  A book entitled "The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam," indicates that the Talmudic god of the Jews (Not the God of Christians) is a blood loving god: "The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the lord, viz: (1) that of Paschal holocaust (Easter sacrifice & the Feast of Purim); (2) that of circumcision."

 According to the Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1903, Vol. IV., p. 90, when performing the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel (Jewish Rabbi who does the circumcision): "takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided." Among the Jews themselves, the blood rite is an integral part of the ceremony of circumcising Jewish males.  What the Jewish Encyclopaedia does not tell us is that this mixture of wine and blood is then drunk by the rabbi, as a great delicacy. No other people in the world today enacts such a primitive blood rite, save, perhaps, some Stone-Age natives in the deepest jungles of the Congo or New Guinea.

 Hatred of Christianity is a well-hidden tradition among the Jews. One of the principle feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament, the only Jewish book in the entire Bible.  The story is that Xeroxes, King of Persia, became enamoured with a Jewess, Esther a prostitute, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King's minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws of the land, and obtained from the King an order to slay them.   Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's ten sons, who were also hanged.

 This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day the Jewish bakers make cakes, laced with dried Christian blood, in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "Haman's Ears," revealing once again the incredible, inherent hate and barbarism of the “chosen” in our midst.

 Another festival at which Ritual Sacrifice has sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah (Which is called Hanukkah today) which occurs in December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the Maccabees in B.C. 165. Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be “saved” unless every year the blood of a Christian is obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption.

 The Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-267, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder (Sacrifices) made against the Jews through the centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the 19th century! There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made in the 19th century than in any previous century, according to this authoritative Jewish list.  The list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers Romains; there are listed 101 accusations, of which 28 were made in the 19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries! Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says: "The nineteenth century proved little less credulous than those which proceeded it." (Ritual Murder Libel and The Jew, 1935)

 The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed than ever before and has been instrumental in reducing the number of charges by covering them up. It is absolutely amazing that there are always influential Judeo-Christian men/women who can be induced, when Jewish interests are at stake, will declare to all the world that there is nothing improper in not attempting to examine these charges of Ritual Sacrifice by the Jews; and to declare them as lies by "Anti-Semitic" authors.  Yet the record is clear if one is inclined to study and learn.

 Following are few such examples: "Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain." (From the account of Dio Cassius in the 78th Book of his history, dated A.D. 117, Chapter 32)

 The second: "Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by shooting, hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive. Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of God, had their religious medals, with the figure of the Virgin, nailed into the sockets of their eyes. La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo, who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered. Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being burned alive as they fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen writhing above the ground." (From the Daily Mail, 17th September (describing the horrors of the Red Revolution in Spain, A.D. 1936)

 From the Magick, in Paris, France: " was the theory of the ancient (Jewish) magicians that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal (non-Jews), and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape...For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A (Christian) male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim." (Magick, by Master Therion, published in 1929 by the Lecram Press, Paris, France)  A footnote on p. 95 says: "(4) It appears from the Magical Records of (the Jew) Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 and 1928."

 Even today the Jewish sects who keep the Passover by solar computation, indulge in these bloody sacrifices of Christians on that feast-day; an account is given of a visit to the scene of a sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in this century, and these words were used: "I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is withdrawn from the neck of the (Christian) lamb of sacrifice."

 A paragraph from the B'nai B'rith Messenger, 1936: "The sophisticated Pharisee (Jew) of the 20th century unceasingly gives thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves a victimized by that person whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint praise. Riddles are irksome. (Which is why Christ always spoke in parables when speaking before the Jewish Pharisees. They did not like it, did not understand the parables and He knew it) The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise (Jews)?"  Although this paragraph is clothed in nonsense it is a picture of a Ritual Sacrifice, with the victim crucified. And is merely showing the contempt the Jew has for Christians because they cannot understand this type of wording.

 John Foxe's Acts and Monuments of the Church records Ritual Sacrifice, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Sacrifice; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew) it is made clear that his career, apart from this Ritual Sacrifice, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

 There are now many Jewish hospitals in the United States, which are owned and operated by Jewish doctors and nurses. A few unsuspecting parents who place their children in these institutions for minor ailments are stunned to be told, a day or two later, that the child has suddenly passed away. In many such cases, the child has been removed to a synagogue and murdered by the prescribed ritual. The bloodless body of the victim is then turned over to the parents. This procedure also obeys the Jewish prohibition against the burial of a gentile, for the Jews simply allow the parents to take care of the burial.

 It, therefore, behoves American parents to avoid leaving their children unguarded in the presence of a Jewish physician or placing the child in a hospital run by Jews. Any parent should think twice about abandoning a helpless child to a people which has a history of five thousand years of murdering children under such horrible circumstances. And any parent should be able to visualize the horror of the handsome, perfectly formed body of the child on which they have lavished such loving care, being stripped and laid down on a table while Jews, their eyes filled with blood lust and hatred of the Christians, gather round the child and pierce its flesh, and drink its blood, and call down curses upon the name of Jesus Christ.

We could go on and on with case after case for literally hundreds of pages, but we believe this should suffice to show that the Jews did and still engage in blood sacrifice of mainly Christian children for their ceremonies. In other words, the Jews have a god which finds murdered blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese, "What sort of a people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from mutilation of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"

Quoting from the Jewish writer Charles A. Weisman's Book "Who is Esau-Edom?": "During the Middle Ages Jews were found guilty of ritual murder of Christians in England; at Norwich in 1146, and Lincoln in 1225; in France at Blois in 1171; and in northern Italy at Trent in 1475. Even the Jewish Encyclopaedia lists 121 Ritual Murder cases from 1146 to 1900, which were tried in courts. Many of the listings show convictions and the mode in which guilty Jews were executed." (This is referenced to The Jewish Encyclopaedia, Vol. III, (1903) pp. 266-67)

Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?": "From 1900 to 1939's there have been about another twenty cases of ritual murder by Jews. Even to this day there are reports of ritual murder of (Christian) children by certain extremist Hasidic Orthodox Jewish sects." (The Pharisees were originally identical with the Hasidim or Hasidic sect of Judaism. The Jewish Encyclopaedia Vol. IX (1905) p. 661)

Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?": "Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have instituted under their de facto law. A more covert means of (Christian) child sacrifice has been by their infamous 'ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.' In this practice 'the blood of the sacrificed gentile (Christian Child) is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.'" (The Illustrated Atlas of Jewish Civilization, Ed. Martin Gilbert, MacMillan Pub. Co., 1990, p. 125)

Historical Precedents

There are many well-respected authors who have attested to this silent fact of Jewish Ritual Murder, for it is not the uneducated who make such claims.  Sir Richard Francis Burton described the Jewish Ritual Murder of Father Thomas and others in his manuscript "Human Sacrifice among the Sephardim or Eastern Jews" (which was later published, in part, as "The Jew, the Gypsy, and el Islam").  Well-respected Russian writer V.V. Rozanov described such activities in his book "The Relationship of Jews to Blood."  Dr. Vladimir Ivanovich Dal, a Russian physician and author of the Dal Living Dictionary (who even has a current postage stamp in his honour), described this in his book "Searching for the Jews who Murder Christian Babies, and How These Jews Use the Babies' Blood" (later published as "Notes about the Ritual Murders").  Well-respected veterinarian Dr. Arnold Leese, whose books about animals even impressed the queen, wrote about these wicked crimes in his book! "Jewish Ritual Murder."  Likewise, Hellmut Schramm, Ph.D., described such vicious crimes in his book "Jewish Ritual Murder: An Historical Investigation."  Russian attorney and Duma member G.G. Zamyslovsky described these vicious crimes in his book "The Murder of Andrei Youshchinsky." Recently, in the United States, Philip DeVier, Ph.D., wrote about this in his brilliant 256-page book "Blood Ritual."  Matt Hale, J.D. (doctor of law), published a book (2002) based on a speech entitled "Jewish Occult Murders: How and Why Jews Sacrificed Non-Jewish Children as Part of Their Religion."  Harrell Rhome, Ph.D., also describes these wicked acts in his book (2002) "Debacle in Damascus: The 1840 Jewish Ritual Murder Case of Father Thomas."  

In the Old Testament we read about children "passing through the fire."  This is a euphemism, of course; for this actually referred to Jews, who followed the occult rites of “the star of their god,” tossing children in a burning pit called a Tophet.  In an ironic fact, the term "holocaust" itself is actually derived from the practice of Jews making a burning sacrifice to their deity, as English dictionaries prior to 1950 will attest.  

Let me briefly quote Dr. Vladimir Ivanovich Dal from the above-cited book on these crimes:
”It was not just one group of people who have accused Jews of committing such deplorable acts; Jews were accused many times of that in court by a variety of people. On the whole, there was not only their own confession in addition to other evidence; but there were such examples where the Jews were exposed and, consequently, had recognized themselves as being true. One such event should obviously be enough for people to acknowledge the real existence of such villainous human mutilation, but the defenders of Jews say something quite different: The confession was forced by torture and, therefore, proves nothing. Assuming, however, this argument is true, too, and believing all that was ever said and written on this problem in favour of Jews, with respect to forced confessions, there is still one circumstance that will remain, which is never paid enough attention. This circumstance not only remains as unexplained by Jews but also is the proof of the crime it! self--namely, it is not doubtful that, from time to time, the corpses of babies, who were missing, were eventually discovered in such distorted conditions and with such signs of external violence that they attested to images of excruciatingly painful deaths.  This is the kind of murder for which the Jews are accused.  Also, the incidents of this nature exclusively occurred only in places where the Jews live.  We must ask ourselves: In what type of circumstance can we attribute the renewed cases of babies who suffered painful deaths--babies who were carefully tortured up to the point of their tragic deaths--if an accusation is not fair?  What reason can we invent for the villainous torture of a baby, if it is not done for religious mutilation? The external signs on corpses indicate each time this is discovered, positively, that the death could not be accidental in any case but intentional.  And, it is obvious that these injuries sustained by the babie! s are deliberately done and take place over a long time: The whole body is poked or pricked.  Then, scraps of skin are cut.  The tongue was often cut out.  The intimate parts of boys are either cut out, or the boys were circumcised. Occasionally, other parts of the body are cut out, and the palms are punctured. Signs of bruises from tight bandages put on and removed again are not uncommon; often, the entire skin has abrasions as if it was burnt or had something rubbing against it.  Sometimes, the corpse was even washed, with it being discovered without any blood in it; nor was there any blood on the undergarments or clothes, demonstrating that they were taken off during the murder and, afterwards, put on again. The parents and siblings of babies who have experienced such tragic deaths wonder: For what possible reason would people commit such deplorable acts to innocent babies? Without a purpose, it could never be done; yet it continues to happen repeatedly! y over time. The ordinary killer, in any case, would be satisfied with one murder. But a murderer who kills for some type of mysterious, important purpose cannot be rejected here.”

   "The weak, unsatisfactory searching of investigators, the different tricks of Jews, their impudent and stubborn denial, not infrequently a bribery, the confidence by the majority of educated people in that an accusation is merely the infamous slander and, finally, the humanity of our criminal laws--all these things saved the Jewish culprits, nearly every time, from deserved execution.  And they--by using their machinations, by giving false oath assurances of innocence, and by using false propaganda that suggested such accusations were merely the result of accomplished injustice with slander built on them--almost always were well prepared for such accusations.  The Jews punished those who demonstrated credible evidence against them.  In the year 1817 [in Russia], a law was enacted on February 28 that the Superior Command announced on March 6: It was prohibited to even suspect the Jews of such crimes, and the opinion that the Jews needed no! n-Jewish blood was called a prejudice. Meanwhile, an examination of the places where the secret training of Talmudists took place recognizes the realization of this mutilation-murder, and the impartial view put forth in these case productions convinces, without doubt, the truth of their validity."

Jewish Hatred For Christians Rekindled

An infamous sermon by Rabbi Leon Spitz, illustrates the message by which the flames of hatred are rekindled every spring in the synagogues: "...Let Esau (As the Jews have stolen the name Israelites from the True descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob: Israel; they call the True Israelites by their name: Esau) whine and wail and protest to the civilized world, and let Jacob raise his hand to fight the good fight. The anti-Semite understands but one language, and he must be dealt with on his own level. The Purim Jews stood up for their lives. American Jews, too, must come to grips with our contemporary anti-Semites. We must fill our insane asylums with anti-Semitic lunatics. We must combat every alien Jew-hater. We must harass and prosecute our Jew-baiters to the extreme limits of the laws. We must humble and shame our anti-Semitic hoodlums to such an extent that none will wish or dare to become their 'fellow-travellers.' 

 "Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews' Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet." (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: 'It was a Jew who said, 'Wars are the Jews' harvest'; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.' The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem, Vol. III, p. 180).

Jewish ritual murder has now reached its zenith, but is not finished yet!


For a link to the on-line book, “Jewish Ritual Murder” by Arnold Leese, (murdered in 1956) visit this site:


Appendix G

Notes on the Demi-gods of Genesis 6

(original author unknown)

Part I. Who Are The Nephilim?

Of all the unimaginable Biblical phenomena on Earth, the progeny of this union between extra-terrestrials and humans is the most bizarre. Man has paid little attention to them until now, for the fact of their existence has been shrouded in legend. But can they be dismissed as myth any longer? In this end time hour, many strange phenomena are occurring. Jesus said, "As the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be" (Matthew 24:37). It was the wickedness of humanity and the abominable union of the supernatural with the natural that moved God to judge the world. We are fast approaching a new period of God's wrath. The return of these super creatures may even now be a real threat to us.


Who are these beings? A clue to their identity is found in their name--Nephilim. The word itself is Hebrew, and it is first used in Genesis 6:4.  There were giants in the earth in those days: and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

Nephilim is translated "giants" in the Authorized King James Version, but "giants" is in no way a complete description.  Commentators like Lange trace the word "Nephilim" to the root "Niphal" meaning "distinguished ones." This corresponds perfectly with the "men of renown" at the end of Genesis 6:4, nevertheless it is not a generally accepted translation.  Others have sought the root of the word in the Hebrew consonants "npl" as found in Psalm 58:8. Here it means "miscarriage." Accepting this theory, the Nephilim would be those superhuman beings that resulted from miscarriages. Genesis Rabbah (26:7) seems to confirm this translation when it states:  Nephilim denotes that they hurled the word down, themselves fell (naflu) from the world, and filled the world with abortions (nephilim) through their immorality. (1)

Most scholars, however, reject both these interpretations and trace the word "Nephilim" to the Hebrew root "Naphal" meaning "to fall." The Nephilim are the "fallen ones." A direct reference to the fallen angels who sired them. Some writers such as Ben Adam believe the word "Nephilim" refers to the fallen angels themselves and not to their offspring.

Because of some uncertainty in the translation of the Hebrew word, more and more Bible versions are now leaving the original word untranslated. Thus the New International Version renders the passage: "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days..." (Genesis 6:4). This also does justice to the fact that the definite article precedes the word in the original. "The Nephilim were on the earth..." The same definite article is also found in the other biblical passage where the word "Nephilim" occurs, namely, Numbers 13:33. "We saw the Nephilim there..."

Interpreting the Nephilim as "the fallen ones" dismisses the suggestion of one modern author that belief in the Nephilim could lead to racism. He fears that people would boast of having celestial blood in their veins and consider themselves superior to those of ordinary, human ancestry. To claim descent from stellar explorers could lead to a class distinction surpassing anything ever seen in society, but he need have no such qualms! If the Nephilim are stellar, they are also infernal. To claim descent from such beings would be to admit an ancestry from Hell.  Although there is no etymological evidence to justify "giants" as an accurate translation for "Nephilim," such a translation is not without merit. In more senses than one, Nephilim were giants.


For one thing, they were giants in size and strength. Much documentation of the exceptional physical stature and super- human strength of the Nephilim exists, and this is not in the least surprising, knowing that they were "fathered" by angels. Angels as already stated, do "excel in strength" (Psalm 103:20). They are greater "in power and might" than men of earth (2 Peter 2:1 1).

What applies to holy angels, applies equally to the offspring of these rebellious angels. Their moral fall does not seem to have reduced their physical prowess. The Book of Enoch states that their "height was like the tallness of cedars and whose bodies were like mountains."  A modern author describes them in the following terms:  Perverted power and strength are (thus) conspicuous attributes of fallen angels. This titanic energy is displayed in the supernatural strength demons can impart to the human body when they enter it and possess it. (2)

The New Testament supplies many such examples. One of the most noted is that of the Gadarene demoniac, who by his super-human strength could snap fetters and break chains.  John Wesley in his journal entry for May 2, 1739, writes of a certain John Haydon, a respectable person, present in one of his meetings, and who "fell off his chair and began screaming terribly and beating himself against the ground ...Two or three men were holding him as well as they could. The man then roared out, "O thou devil! thou cursed devil! Yea, thou legion of devils! thou canst not stay! Christ will cast thee out!"' Fortunately, after prayer, Wesley reports that "both his body and soul were set at liberty."  These and countless similar examples are reminiscent of what happened to the seven sons of Sceva in Acts 19. A demonised man out-numbered seven to one, was able to overcome all seven by a phenomenal show of strength. The Bible states that they were fortunate to escape from the house naked and wounded.


In Genesis 6, where the word "Nephilim" is first used, we are told that the Nephilim appeared on the Earth just before the Flood, and that their appearance was the main reason for the Flood.

(The main reason for the Flood was mankind's total rebellion against God, Genesis 6:5-8, "The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart. So the LORD said, "I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the ground, man and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them." But Noah found favour in the eyes of the LORD.--ed.)

There followed another incursion of these fallen angels at a later date, (i.e., after the Flood,--ed.).
We read in Genesis 6: "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days and also afterward..."
(N.I.V.). This data is found in Numbers 13:33: "We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim)" (N.I.V.).  This second eruption was probably on a more limited and restricted scale than the first. Nevertheless, God ordered their complete destruction.

One has often wondered at the severe an extreme measures that God asked Joshua to put into effect once he entered the land of Canaan. God commanded him to "utterly destroy them."  (The Canaanites were not these giants, they were descended from Ham's son Canaan--the post-flood giants, the offspring of fallen angels merely lived in the same land--near Hebron and in parts of what is now Jordan.--ed)

We have found it difficult to reconcile this with the character of God. One can only surmise that God had a special reason to issue such a command. Could it be that God knew the heritage of these Nephilim?

God was aware that the Canaanites and their neighbours manifested the whole gamut of demonical practices, and that they were a threat to the character and destiny of His chosen people Israel, who were entering the land at that time. This is why He warned the Israelites not to imitate the occult practices of these people whom they dispossessed. With the same unmatched anger that He had displayed in Genesis 6, God orders the complete extermination of the inhabitants of Canaan. "But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee" (Deuteronomy 20:17). However, Israel, as so often in her history, failed to obey God, and there is reason to believe that some of the Nephilim survived (Joshua 13:13, 16:10; Judges 1:28-34).

The progeny of these Nephilim went under various names. We read of the Anakim, descended from Anak (Numbers 13:28); the Rephaim, descended from Rapha; the Zamzummims, the Emims, the Avims, etc. All shared the characteristics of being huge, tall and strong. Rabbi Bahya ben Asher, a Spanish Cabalist, claimed the Nephilim were heads of the family called "sons of God." They were so called because terror fell on those who saw them. As the virility of the stock declined, they were called Anakim and later Rephaim. (7) Here is an Old Testament description of the Emim:  "The Emim dwelt therein in times past, a people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakim; which also were accounted giants, as the Anakim; but the Moabites called them Emims. (Deuteronomy 2:10, 11)."

These men were such giants that the Israelite spies who went in to reconnoitre the land, cowered before them:  "And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight." (Numbers 13:33).

Flavius Josephus, the noted historian of the first century A.D., described these giants as having "bodies so large and countenances so entirely different from other men that they were surprising to the sight and terrible to the hearing." (8) And he adds that in his day, the bones of the giants were still on display! Deuteronomy 3:11 describes one of these giants in more detail:  "For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants: behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? Nine cubits was the length thereof and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man."

A super king-sized bed! In modem measurements it was 18 feet, 6 inches long, and 8 feet, 4 inches wide! Some of these giants carried spears that weighed from ten to twenty-five pounds. One carried a spear whose staff was "like a weaver's beam" (II Samuel 21:19). Goliath wore a coat of armour that weighed 196 pounds, and he was said to be about nine feet tall. Some of these giants had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot.


These giants were not confined to the Middle East. Two dozen human footprints of abnormal size have been found in the Paluxi riverbed, Texas, some of them measuring eighteen inches long. Other giant markings have been discovered in such diverse places as Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona and California. In the Mt. Vernon area of Ohio, Dr. Wilbur G. Burroughs of the Geological Division of the Berea College, Kentucky, reported finds of human foot prints 23.75 cm. long and 10.25 wide! Near Antelope Springs, Utah, William Meister discovered in 1968 two human footprints 32.5 cm. long and 11.25 wide.

Similar giant footprints have been discovered in other countries especially in the Mt. Victoria region of Australia.  Not only do we have footprints of giants but actual skeletons as well. In 1936 Larson Kohl, the German palaeontologist and anthropologist, found the bones of gigantic men on the shore of Lake Elyasi in Central Africa. Other giant skeletons were later found in Hava, the Transvaal and China. The evidence for the existence of giants is incontrovertible. "A scientifically assured fact," says Dr. Louis Burkhalter. (9)


The Nephilim also were giants in knowledge. According to the Book of Enoch, God was incensed against the fallen angels partly because they disclosed certain classified information to humans. The ancient world associated demons with special esoteric knowledge and with superior intelligence. The word "demon" in Greek (daimon) comes from the root meaning "knowledge" or "intelligence." The Scriptures also testify to the fact that demons have access to knowledge and information denied to ordinary mortals. We read in the Gospels how they recognized and acknowledged the deity of Christ when humans seemed totally blind to the fact. When the Gaderene demoniac saw Jesus, he fell down before him, and cried out, "What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God most high?" (Luke 8:28). These demons recognized Jesus at the beginning of His ministry, way ahead of His own disciples.

In the Book of Acts, with the same supernatural knowledge, demons recognized the mission and message of the Apostle Paul. The possessed damsel at Philippi cried, "These men are the servants of the most high God, which shew unto us the way of salvation" (Acts 16:17). This happened at a time when the people of Philippi had no idea who Paul was, nor did they know the nature of his mission. We cannot but note that every recorded statement made by demons in the New Testament concerning Christ or Paul was one-hundred percent accurate.

Clement of Alexandria suggested an interesting reason for this superior knowledge of demons:  It is evident, since they are demoniac spirits, that they know some things more quickly and more perfectly than men, for they are not retarded in learning by the heaviness of a body.  Examples of this trait in demons are supplied by various missionary organizations. They tell us how people possessed by evil spirits acquire superior knowledge, far above that of their brethren. In an editorial in Christian Life Magazine we find these words concerning the murder of five young American missionaries in the jungles of Ecuador in 1956:

"Indians at Arajuno mission base knew in a few hours what had happened when five missionaries deep in Ecuador's Auca territory in 1956 failed to make radio contact with anxiously waiting fellow missionaries. How? They asked a local witch doctor. He obliged by falling into a trance, calling up his favourite demons and asking them to tell him where the missing missionaries were.  According to the friendly Indians, they heard demons leave the scene and, in a short time, returned with the message that the missionaries were in the Curaray River with Auca lances in them."

John L. Nevius, a medical missionary in China at the end of the last century gathered a significant compendium of data on this subject. After sending a detailed questionnaire to Protestant missionaries all over China, he gleaned a vast amount of information about the symptoms of demonism. One characteristic he found again and again was the prevalence of superior knowledge and intelligence in the possessed person--even on subject matters of which the person had no prior knowledge.


This may well supply the key to the great knowledge and expertise that characterized certain men in ancient times. As already seen, such knowledge and expertise by "primitive" men continue to defy explanation. P.J. Wiseman admits to this mysterious factor:  It was expected that the more ancient the period, the more primitive would excavators find it to be, until traces of civilization ceased altogether and aboriginal man appeared. Neither in Babylonia, nor Egypt, the land of the oldest known habitations of man, has this been the case. (10)

Arthur Custance pertinently states this strange sequence right at the beginning of human history:  " unbelievably long time with almost no growth; a sudden spurt leading within a very few centuries to a remarkably high culture; a gradual slowing up, and decay, followed only much later by recovery of lost arts and by development of new ones leading ultimately to the creation of our modern world. What was the agency which operated for that short period of time to so greatly accelerate the process of cultural development and produce such remarkable results?" (11)

Could this agency be the Nephilim? Could this expertise have been imparted by beings from outer space? And could this explain the mysteries surrounding Stonehenge, the Mayan Caracol, Tiahuanaco, the Bay of Pisco, and particularly the Great Pyramid? Did the knowledge necessary to construct these monolithic structures come from the Nephilim? Were they the ones responsible for what Custance calls the "climax at the beginning"? (12)

As for the Great Pyramid, many scientists suggest a date back in the generations preceding the Flood. If so, those happen to be the very times of the Nephilim, the generations of the "giants" and of the "men of renown." But what if it could be proven that the Great Pyramid was not built until after the Flood? There is still no problem.

(Note: The pyramids are made of fossiliferous limestone derived from flood deposits, so the pyramids definitely do not predate the Flood--ed.)

Could not Noah and his family have carried this information with them into the Ark, and transmitted it later to their descendants? According to the Babylonian version of the Flood, the "Chaldean" Noah was made to bury his books before the Flood, and then disentomb them after emerging from the Ark. But there is still another possibility: Could this knowledge have come from the second eruption of the Nephilim, which occurred after the Flood?


If we go further back, could one find a linkage between this esoteric knowledge and the "tree of knowledge" found in the Garden of Eden? We know that this was the one tree whose fruit Adam and Eve were forbidden to eat, or even touch (Genesis 2:17, 3:3). Why was this tree so named? Few commentators have shed any light on its meaning. Many dismiss the account as mere symbolism, without even telling us what the symbolism is supposed to represent. Others look upon the passage as poetry; conveniently forgetting poetry is often the truest history. It not only relates facts but interprets them as well. Poetry has been described as "history written from the inside rather than from the outside, and therefore incomparably truer. (13) Or in the words of British author Graham Green, "Poetry is the photography of the invisible."

Supposing we applied this principle to the "tree of knowledge." If it is a symbol, then obviously it must be a symbol of something. Or if poetry, then it must convey some inner truth. But why should one speculate and search for cryptic meanings when the truth may well be on the surface. Obviously, the "tree of knowledge" must have something to do with knowledge, or why should it be so named? It undoubtedly contained the key to certain divinely classified material that God did not want early man to possess. But somehow, and it could well be by means of the Nephilim, early man did come to possess that knowledge--at least a part of it.

This was knowledge that primitive man could never have discovered on his own. Indeed, it was knowledge beyond the capacity of modern man! Kelly Segraves reminds us: "With all our intelligences, we cannot figure out how pyramids were constructed." (14)

(not true, the construction of the pyramids has been reviewed and re-examined in recent years. No supernormal or supernatural factors need to be invoked to explain their construction--ed.)

We ask again, could this intelligence have been transmitted by the "sons of God"?

Egypt is not the only country that has pyramids. A whole network of them can be found around the planet--in Cambodia, Shen Shi, China, Thailand, Mexico, Nazca, Yucatan, Alaska...How does one account for such advanced scientific technology, on such a universal scale, and in such prehistoric times?

Could the answer be man's longevity at that time? The average age span before the Flood was close to nine hundred years-- thirteen times the proverbial "three score and ten." This, of course, provided exceptional opportunity for learning, research, experimentation and the accumulation of knowledge. If only modern-day scientists could live that long! But longevity alone could never account for the specialized knowledge that our forefathers possessed. Their awesome expertise indicates a source outside of themselves. No other viable explanation can be offered except that mankind was pre-programmed from the depths of space.

The Bible not only supplies the key to the source of this knowledge, but to the way it was transmitted--space-beings called "fallen-angels." As we have seen, such extraterrestrials possess superior knowledge. This they transmitted to man in direct contradiction to God's wishes.   Satan, the leader of fallen angels, is himself a creature of rare brilliance and inimitable genius. The Latin translation of his name, "Lucifer" (from the Hebrew "Helel"), comes from a root meaning "brilliance" or "magnificence." This is a trait he shares with his cohorts. He and they have access to classified, divine information, and are cognizant of hidden things (See Acts 16:16, 17).

According to Professor C. S. Dickerson, "The source of their knowledge is found in their superior created nature and in their vast experience, as they lived through many thousands of years observing and collecting information." (15)

John L. Nevius, after surveying demon possession in China, documents the amazing knowledge revealed by the demon- possessed: "Many persons while demon possessed give evidence of knowledge which cannot be accounted for in ordinary ways. They often appear to know of the Lord Jesus as a divine person and show an aversion to, and a fear of Him. They sometimes converse in foreign languages of which in their normal states they are entirely ignorant." (16)


Betty and Barney Hill of New Hampshire, while returning home from a vacation in Canada in 1961, spotted a flying saucer and pulled off the road to watch it land. The engine of their car went dead, but they have no recollection of what happened after that. The next thing they remembered was being close to home... sixty miles south! After this bizarre experience, they suffered from nightmares, anxiety syndromes and ulcers. They finally consulted a psychiatrist, the noted Dr. Benjamin Simon of Boston. By the use of hypnosis, he was able to induce from them--quite independently of each other--the story of those missing hours. Both told the same story. Taken aboard the flying saucer, they underwent physical examination by the humanoid occupants. Tape recordings were made of their story (given under hypnosis), and a book was published. Later, an NBC television movie was made of the event.

Stanton T. Friedman, a nuclear physicist, studied these reports and was greatly impressed. But what finally convinced him was the map drawn in 1964 by Betty Hill of a star system unknown to science at the time. Betty claimed that she had been shown this map aboard the UFO, and revealed the details of it under hypnosis. The astronomers who examined the map at that time, dismissed it. But since 1964 new evidence has appeared on the subject--star systems that were invisible in 1964 have now been discovered. And an amazing fact has come to light. Dr. Friedman explains:  "Using these new data, a computer came up with a map of the Zeta Reticuli system--faint stars 220 trillion miles away - which astronomers agree matches Mrs. Hill's precisely." (17)


Giants in wickedness is another distinction of the Nephilim. Sired by demonic beings, their character and activity certainly reveal the nature of the "fallen ones."

Many of the legends surrounding the cross breeding between the natural and the supernatural depict subhuman behaviour. To the last one, the semi-gods of mythology--Zeus (the Roman Jupiter), Poseidon (Neptune), Eros (Cupid), Hermes (Mercury)--were violent, wanton, lustful and promiscuous beyond restraint. They constantly engaged in sex orgies and seduction, and produced the strangest of offspring. Emil Gaverluk tells of Zeus:  "He disregarded marriage laws and engaged in love affairs with members of both sexes. Zeus married Hera, his sister. One of the loves of Zeus was Europa. He seduced her by becoming a bull and carrying her away. Another was Leda, daughter of Thestios, King of Aetolia and the wife of Tyndereus, King of Sparta. But this did not stop Zeus...Athene was the daughter of Metis by Zeus. Metis tried to evade him. He seduced her. She warned him that if he did this again and the child was a male, that child would depose and conquer him. Zeus didn't like the sound of this and took no chances. He swallowed the child whole. Zeus' amorous victories illustrate the actions of uncontrolled spirit-beings lusting after human flesh." (18)

This is only one example from Greek mythology of the evil associations between spirit-entities from space and human beings from Earth. But it was not only the spirit-beings who acted this way; they seem to have passed on the trait to their descendants.  The Nephilim, in this respect more than in anything else, were close imitators of their fathers. They reflected the works of their demon ancestry. And just as there are degrees of goodness among the saints, so there are degrees of evil among the demons. Evidence of this is recorded in Matthew 12:43-45. It tells of the unclean spirit returning to occupy the house from which he had been displaced, and returns with "seven other spirits more wicked than himself."

Irrespective of the degree of evil, all demons are regarded by God as vile and depraved. A recurring biblical adjective is "unclean" (Matthew 10:1, Mark 1:27, 3:11). These spirits are both morally and spiritually unclean, and the same distinctive applies to their progeny on Earth. What is more, those who traffic with such beings, frequently end up like them. Indeed such is the degree of their degradation that the Lord abandons them to their own depravity. Romans 1:24-32 graphically states that "God gave them up." The depths of their degradation and the infamy of their immoralities, puts them on a level lower than animals. Abandoned by God to the consequences of their wickedness, and deranged by demonic harassment, people have been driven to insane asylums and even to suicide.

Is it any wonder when incorrigible spirit-beings and rebellious humans cooperated to pollute Earth, to seek genetic control and produce hybrids that threatened the race itself, and even tried to thwart the very plan of God, that God should intervene in a judgment terrible to behold? (19)


The Nephilim were giants in pride also. Lord Acton claimed that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely, as does knowledge. With their superior intelligence and knowledge, the Nephilim soon succumbed to the sin that became the downfall of Lucifer--pride (1 Timothy 3:6). Like Lucifer, his followers also dreamed of being gods, desiring to control and rule the Earth. Their advanced knowledge was the desired diet for their egotism. Such knowledge wedded to an already arrogant nature led to self-deification. They craved divine honours and religious worship. This was the ambition of Lucifer, of the Nephilim, and of every fallen creature. They were propelled in all that they did by self-will, self-determination, self-glorification, and ultimately self-deification. No wonder Josephus refers to the Nephilim as "sons who were overbearing and disdainful of every virtue."

Man's fascination with the occult and otherworld phenomena is amazingly significant today. At no other time has he been more conditioned to accept the possibility of extraterrestrial life. Having once escaped his Mother Earth, man now strains at his celestial tether, wondering what or who lies beyond the final frontier. With this star ward look, the stage could be set for the coming of the unwelcome guests from space. The "days of Noah" are again here; perhaps even now agents from another realm are plotting the return of the Nephilim.


1. Tr. I. Epstein 1.218.
2. Merill Unger, Demons in the World Today (Wheaton: Tyndale House, 1971), p. 26.
3. Quoted by F. Seth Dryness, Jr., The Journal of Christian Reconstruction, Vol. 1, No. 2, Winter 1974, p. 51.
4. Kurt Koch, Christian Counselling and Occultism (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1973).
5. Ibid., p. 22.
6. Robert Pearson, Storm Over Borneo, (Overseas Missionary Fellowship, 1967).
7. Rabbi Bahya ben Asher., Biur al ha Toral (Venice, 1566), p. 179.
8. Josephus, The Work of Flavius Josephus; Antiquities of the Jews (London: G. G. Rutledge), 1.3.1., Book vii.
9. Revue du Musee de Beyrouth.
10. P.J. Wiseman, New Discoveries in Babylon about Genesis (London: Marshall, Morgan and Scott, 2nd edition), pp. 28-29.
11. Arthur C. Custance, Genesis and Early Man (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House 1975), p. 103.
12. Ibid., pp. 81ff.
13. J. Cynddylan Jones, Primeval Revelation (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1897), pp. 206-7.
14. Kelly Segraves, The Great Flying Saucer Myth (San Diego: Beta Books, 1975), p. 52.
15. C. S. Dickerson, Angels Elect and Evil (Chicago: Moody Press, 1975), p. 165.
16. John L. Nevius, Demon Possession and Allied Themes (Old Tappan, New Jersey: Fleming H. Revell, 1894), p. 161.
17. Stanton T. Friedman, UFOs A Complete Nightmare (Dick Adler, Los Angeles Times, October 20,1975), p. 14.
18. Emil Gaverluk, Did Genesis Man Conquer Space? (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1974), pp. 88-89.
19. C. S. Dickerson, Angels Elect and Evil (Chicago: Moody Press, 1975), pp. 170-174.


Part II: Sons of God, Daughters of Men

"The craving of demons for a body, evident in the Gospels, offers at least some parallel to this hunger for sexual experience." -Derek Kidner

In 1947 an Arab boy tending his sheep accidentally discovered an ancient cave near the Dead Sea. In it were found a priceless collection of ancient scrolls, which soon became known as the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Qumran Texts. Among these writings was one known as the Genesis Apocryphon. At first it was thought to be the long lost Book of Lamech. Although the scroll consisted of a speech by Lamech and a story about some of the patriarchs from Enoch to Abraham; it was not that book.

According to the Bible, Lamech was the son of Methuselah and the father of Noah. He was the ninth of the ten patriarchs of the antediluvian world.  It is significant, however, that the Genesis Apocryphon mentions the Nephilim, and makes reference to the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men" introduced in Genesis 6. The Apocryphon also elaborates considerably on the succinct statements found in the Bible, and provides valuable insights into the way these ancient stories were interpreted by the ancient Israelites.

The copy of the Genesis Apocryphon discovered at Qumran dates back to the 2nd century B.C., but it was obviously based on much older sources. When discovered in 1947, it had been much mutilated from the ravages of time and humidity. The sheets had become so badly stuck together that years passed before the text was deciphered and made known. When scholars finally made public its content, the document confirmed that celestial beings from the skies had landed on planet Earth. More than that, it told how these beings had mated with Earth-women and had begat giants.

Is this story myth or history, fable or fact? Specialized research has revealed that many ancient legends have a basis in fact. But to answer the question, let us consult the most authoritative document known to man--the Bible.

In Genesis 6:1-4 the "sons of God" are captivated by the beauty of the "daughters of men." They subsequently marry them and produce an offspring of giants known as the Nephilim. Genesis goes on to say that these Nephilim were "mighty men" and "men of renown."  "Sons of God"? "Daughters of men"? What sort of beings were these? Were they human or did they belong to an alien species from outer space?


There is no problem in identifying the "daughters of men" for this is a familiar method of designating women in the Bible. The problem lies with the "sons of God." Three major interpretations have been offered to shed light on this cryptic designation.  First, a group within Orthodox Judaism theorized that "sons of God" meant "nobles" or "magnates." Hardly anyone today accepts this potentially dangerous view.

Second, some interpret the "sons of God" as fallen angels. These were enticed by the women of Earth and began lusting after them. Many reputable Bible commentators have rejected this theory on psycho-physiological grounds. How can one believe, they ask, that angels from Heaven could engage in sexual relations with women from Earth? Philastrius labelled such an interpretation a down-right heresy.

Third, many famed scholars contend that the "sons of God" are the male descendants of Seth, and that the "daughters of men" are the female descendants of Cain. According to this view, what actually happened in Genesis 6 was an early example of believers marrying unbelievers. The good sons of Seth married the bad daughters of Cain, and the result of these mixed marriages was a mongrel offspring. These later became known for their decadence and corruption; indeed, it reached such a degree that God was forced to intervene and destroy the human race. This comment of Matthew Henry could be taken as representative of those holding this view:
"The sons of Seth (that is the professors of religion) married the daughters of men, that is, those that were profane, and strangers to God and godliness. The posterity of Seth did not keep by themselves, as they ought to have done. They inter- mingled themselves with the excommunicated race of Cain." (1)

However, in spite of the excellent pedigree of the proponents of this theory, their argument is not convincing. Their interpretation is pure eisegesis--they are guilty of reading into the text what is obviously not there.


Their interpretation fails on other grounds as well. At no time, before the Flood or after, has God destroyed or threatened to destroy the human race for the sin of "mixed marriages." It is impossible to reconcile this extreme punishment with the mere verbal strictures found elsewhere in the Bible for the same practice. If God is going to be consistent, He should have destroyed the human race many times over!

The contrast made in Genesis 6:2 is not between the descendants of Seth and the descendants of Cain, but between the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men." If by "sons of God" is meant "sons of Seth," then only the sons of Seth engaged in mixed marriages, and not the daughters. And only the daughters of Cain were involved, and not the sons. And another strange assumption is implied: that only the sons of Seth were godly, and only the daughters of Cain were evil.
The strangeness is compounded when one seeks for evidence that the sons of Seth were godly. We know from Genesis that when the time came for God to destroy the human race, He found only one godly family left among them--that of Noah. Where were all the other supposedly godly sons of Seth? Even Seth's own son could hardly be called righteous. His name was Enos, meaning "mortal" or "frail." And he certainly lived up to it! Genesis 4:26 reads, "And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the Lord." That statement seems harmless enough, but what does it mean when it says that it was only now that men began to call upon the name of the Lord? Upon whom did Adam call? And Abel? And Seth himself?

Some scholars give us a more literal and exact translation to this verse: "Then men began to call themselves by the name of Jehovah." Other scholars translate the statement in this manner: "Then men began to call upon their gods (idols) by the name of Jehovah." If either of these were the correct translation then the evidence for the so-called godly line of Seth is non- existent. The truth of the matter is that Enos and his line, with few noted exceptions, were as ungodly as the other line. The divine record could not be clearer: "all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth" (Genesis 6:12).

In the Old Testament, the designation "sons of God" (bene Elohim) is never used of humans, but always of supernatural beings that are higher than man but lower than God. To fit such a category only one species is known--angels. And the term "sons of God" applies to both good and bad angels. These are the beings of whom Augustine wrote:  "Like the gods they have corporeal immortality, and passions like human beings." (2)

The designation "sons of God" is used four other times in the Old Testament, each time referring to angels. One example is Daniel 3:25, where king Nebuchadnezzar looks into the fiery furnace and sees four men, "and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God." The translation is different and clearer in our modern versions, "like a son of the gods." Since Jesus had not yet become the "only begotten son" of God, this "son" would have had to be angelic.

Another example is Job 38:7 which says the sons of God shouted for joy when God laid the foundations of the Earth. Angels are the only entities that fit this designation since man had not been created at that time!  In Job 1:6 and Job 2:1 the "sons of God" came to present themselves before the Lord in Heaven. Among the sons of God is Satan--a further implication that the "sons of God" must have been angels.

Since the designation "sons of God" is consistently used in the Old Testament for angels, it is logical to conclude that the term in Genesis 6:2 also refers to angels.


In the New Testament, born-again believers in Christ are called the children of God or the sons of God (Luke 3:38, John 1:12, Romans 8:14, 1 John 3:1). Dr. Bullinger in the Companion Bible states: "It is only by the divine specific act of creation that any created being can be called 'a son of God.'" This explains why every born-again believer is a son of God. It explains also why Adam was a Son of God. Adam was specifically created by God, "in the likeness of God made He him" (Genesis 5:1). Adam's descendants, however, were different; they were not made in God's likeness but in Adam's. Adam "begat a son in his own likeness, after his image" (Genesis 5:3).

Adam was a "son of God," but Adam's descendants were "sons of men."  Lewis Sperry Chafer expresses this in an interesting way when he states:  "In the Old Testament terminology angels are called sons of God while men are called servants of God. In the New Testament this is reversed. Angels are the servants and Christians are the sons of God." (3)

It is thus clear that the term "sons of God" in the Bible is limited to three categories of beings: angels, Adam and believers. All three are special and specific creations of God. As for the use of the term in Genesis 6, since it cannot possibly refer to Adam nor believers in Christ, we conclude that it has to refer to the angels whom God had created.


Two New Testament passages shed further light on Genesis 6. They are Jude 6-7 and 2 Peter 2:4. These verses indicate that at some point in time a number of angels fell from their pristine state and proceeded to commit a sexual sin that was both unusual and repugnant. Jude 6-7 states:  "And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh..."

These angels not only failed to keep their original dominion and authority, but they "left their own habitation." Habitation is a significant word: it means "dwelling place" or "heaven." And the addition of the Greek word "idion" ("their own") means that they left their own private, personal, unique possession. (4) Heaven was the private, personal residence of the angels. It was not made for man but for the angels. This is why the ultimate destination of the saints will not be Heaven but the new and perfect Earth which God will create (Revelation 21:1-3). Heaven is reserved for the angels, but as for the beings referred to in Jude 6-7, they abandoned it.

Not only did these angels leave Heaven, they left it once-for- all. The Greek verb "apoleipo" is in the aorist tense, thus indicating a once-for-all act. By taking the action they did, these angels made a final and irretrievable decision. They crossed the Rubicon. Their action, says Kenneth Wuest, "was apostasy with a vengeance." (5)

As to the specific sin of these angels, we are given the facts in Jude 7. As in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah it was the sin of "fornication" and it means "going after strange flesh." "Strange" flesh means flesh of a different kind (Greek "heteros"). To commit this particularly repugnant sin, the angels had to abandon their own domain and invade a realm that was divinely forbidden to them. Says Wuest: "These angels transgressed the limits of their own natures to invade a realm of created beings of a different nature." (6)

Alford confirms:  "It was a departure from the appointed course of nature and seeking after that which is unnatural, to other flesh than that appointed by God for the fulfilment of natural desire."  The mingling of these two orders of being, was contrary to what God had intended, and summarily led to God's greatest act of judgment ever enacted upon the human race.


Another New Testament verse may have bearing on Genesis 6. In I Corinthians 11:10, Paul instructs that a woman should cover her head as a sign of subjection to her husband, and also "because of the angels." This observation has intrigued commentators through the years. Why this sudden reference to angels? Could it be a reference to what happened in Genesis 6 where angels succumbed to the inducements and physical charm of the women of Earth? Obviously, Paul believed that an uncovered woman was a temptation even to angels. William Barclay mentions an old rabbinic tradition, which alleges that it was the beauty of the women's long hair that attracted and tempted the angels in Genesis. (6)


The offspring of this union between the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men" were so extraordinary that it indicates an unusual parentage. In no way could the progenitors of such beings be ordinary humans. Their mothers possibly could be human, or their fathers, but certainly not both. Either the father or the mother had to be superhuman. Only in such a way can one account for the extraordinary character and prowess of the offspring.  God's law of reproduction, according to the biblical account of creation, is "everything after his kind." God's law makes it impossible for giants to be produced by normal parentage. To produce such monstrosities as the Nephilim presupposes super- natural parentage.


"Nephilim" is a Hebrew word translated in the Authorized King James version as "giants." "There were giants in the earth in those days" (Genesis 6:4). It is true that they were giants in more senses than one. However, the word Nephilim does not mean "giants." It comes from the root "naphal," meaning "fallen ones," and most modern versions of the Bible have left the word "Nephilim" untranslated.

When the Greek Septuagint was made, "Nephilim" was translated as "gegenes." This word suggests "giants" but actually it has little reference to size or strength. "Gegenes" means "earth born." The same term was used to describe the mythical "Titans" -- being partly of celestial and partly of terrestrial origin. (7)

The Hebrew and the Greek words do not exclude the presence of great physical strength. Indeed, a combined supernatural and natural parentage would imply such a characteristic. Angels, according to Scripture, are known for their power. They are often referred to as "sons of the Mighty" (Psalm 103:20). Therefore, if the ones who sired them were strong and mighty, it could be assumed that their offspring were likewise.

No evidence exists in Scripture that the offspring of mixed marriages (believers and unbelievers) were giants, excelling in great strength and might. No evidence can be found anywhere in history for that matter. Such an interpretation poses impossible assumptions.

When the word "Nephilim" is used in Numbers 13:33, the question of size and strength is explicit. Here we are left in no doubt as to their superhuman prowess. When Joshua's spies reported back from Canaan, they called certain of the inhabitants of Canaan "giants." "And there we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, which come of the Nephilim, and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight."

Some commentators have speculated that the Nephilim of Numbers 13 belonged to a second eruption of fallen angels, since the earlier Nephilim had been destroyed in the Flood. And they see an allusion to this in Genesis 6:4, where it states that "there were Nephilim in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men." Could it be that the "after that" was a reference to the Nephilim found in Canaan during the Israelite entry into the land? If so, it could explain why the Lord commanded the total extermination of the Canaanites, as He had earlier ordered the near annihilation of the human race.


The Book of Isaiah says that the Nephilim and their descendants will not participate in a resurrection as is the portion of ordinary mortals. Isaiah 26:14 reads: "They are dead, they shall not live; they are deceased, they shall not rise." The original Hebrew word translated "deceased" here is the word "Rephaim." It would have saved a lot of misinterpretation if the translators had left the word as it was in the original. The verse actually reads: "Dead, they shall not live; Rephaim, they shall not rise." The Rephaim are generally understood to be one of the branches of the Nephilim, and God's Word makes it clear that they are to partake in no resurrection. But with humans it is different: all humans will be resurrected either to life or to damnation (John 5:28-29). (Note: the Nephilim had human mothers, but no human fathers, so they were not considered members of Adam's race. Only the members of Adam's race are offered redemption--the angels are not. Thus when they died the Nephilim spirits could have become disembodied and free to roam, seeking other bodies of men or animals to possess and dwell in. It has been suggested that this group of fallen spirits is responsible for the phenomenon of demon possession in the world today--ed.)

We have already seen that the Greek Version of the Old Testament (The Septuagint) translated "Nephilim" as "gegenes;" we shall now inquire how it translates "sons of God." In some of the manuscripts it is left as "sons of God," but in the others-- including the Alexandrian text--it is rendered by the word "angelos." This text was in existence in the time of Christ, but there is no indication that He ever corrected or queried it. Can we not assume from His silence that He agreed with the translation!


Having studied all the arguments in favour of "sons of Seth," one concludes that the only argument that is valid among them is that of rationality. "Sons of Seth" is an interpretation that is more palatable to human reason. Reason can never subscribe to the incredible notion that fallen angels could have sex relations with women of Earth. Angels have no physical bodies! They do not marry! They belong to an entirely different species of being! The mind revolts against such absurdity. So, what does one do? Settle, of course, for an easy, rational interpretation--sons of Seth and daughters of Cain. But what if the meaning of Scripture is clearly otherwise? There is the rub! Scripture is clearly otherwise! To impose a human interpretation at the expense of the obvious meaning of the divine Word, is a rape of the biblical text. Furthermore, when one deals with the world of the supernatural, rationality is never an argument.

Perhaps the most conclusive argument for interpreting the expression as "angels" is the simplest one of all. If the writer of Genesis wanted to refer to the "sons of Seth" he would have just said so. If God had intended that meaning, then the verse would undoubtedly read, "the sons of Seth saw the daughters of Cain that they were fair..." But the Bible meant something far more sinister--the sexual union between angels from Hell and evil women from Earth. Because of the gravity of such a union, and its dire consequences for the human race, God moved to destroy the race before it could destroy itself--except for one family which had not been contaminated.


God made man in His own image, the highest of all His earthly creations. While God said that everything He made was good, He considered man very good. Man had been made for fellowship with God Himself, but he soon turned his back upon his Maker and worshipped the creature more than the Creator. Before many generations, the human race was being polluted by this abominable union with demons. It seemed that Hell and Earth were in league together against the God of Heaven. God's righteous anger was such that He regretted having made man.  "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the Lord that he had made man. ..."(Genesis 6:5-6)

It was specifically because of this ultimate sin that God brought about a deluge of such magnitude that man and beast were drowned from the face of the Earth. In the words of old Joseph Hall:  "The world was so grown foul with sin, that God saw it was time to wash it with a flood: and so close did wickedness cleave to the authors of it, that when they were washed to nothing, yet it would not wash off, yea, so deep did it stick in the very grain of the earth, that God saw it meet to let it soak long under the waters." (14)


Why Noah and his immediate family were the only ones immune from this great judgment is significant. Genesis 6:9 says, "Noah was a just man." He stood out as an example of righteousness and godliness in a perverse age. Like Enoch before him, Noah also "walked with God." But there was another reason why Noah was spared, one that seems to have escaped most commentators. Genesis 6:9 says that Noah was "perfect in his generation." Does this mean moral and spiritual perfection? Hardly. Genesis 9:20-23 disproves any such perfection. What, then, does the Bible mean by calling him "perfect"? The Hebrew word is "tamiym" and comes from the root word "taman." This means "without blemish" as in Exodus 12:5, 29:1, Leviticus 1:3. Just as the sacrificial lamb had to be without any physical blemish, so Noah's perfection. In its primary meaning, it refers not to any moral or spiritual quality, but to physical purity. Noah was uncontaminated by the alien invaders.

He alone had preserved their pedigree and kept it pure, in spite of prevailing corruption brought about by the fallen angels. (15) And again: Noah's bloodline had remained free of genetic contamination. (16)  This implies, of course, that all the other families on Earth had been contaminated by the Nephilim. It also proves that the assault of Satan on the human race had been far more extensive than realized. It is no wonder that God pronounced such a universal fiat of judgment.  As for the fallen angels who participated in the abomination, God put them in custody "in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day" (Jude 6). This is sometimes interpreted as Tartarus or the "nether realms" (2 Peter 2:4). This would also explain why some fallen angels are in custody and why others are free to roam the heavens and torment mankind.  Such a drastic punishment, both for men and angels, presupposed a drastic sin, something infinitely more evil and more sinister than mixed marriages. It was nothing less than the demonic realm attempting to pervert the human world. By genetic control and the production of hybrids, Satan was out to rob God of the people He had made for Himself.

If Satan had succeeded in corrupting the human race, he would have hindered the coming of the perfect Son of God, the promised "seed of the woman," who would defeat Satan and restore man's dominion (Genesis 3:15). If Satan had by any means prevented that birth, he would obviously have averted his own doom. Satan did succeed to a large extent. It was for this reason that God drowned mankind in the Deluge.


Interpreting the "sons of God" as fallen angels, the question immediately arises--do angels marry? In Matthew 22:30, Jesus said angels neither marry nor are given in marriage. This seems a clear and emphatic negative. However, it does not preclude the possibility of such a thing happening--obviously contrary to the will of God. And it does not preclude fallen angels, who had rebelled against God already, from cohabiting with women of Earth, as the Scriptures state.  Some interpret the words of Jesus as meaning that angels do not marry among themselves. Is it because they are all male? Or is it because celestial beings are deathless and thus need no offspring. Only terrestrial beings need to find immortality in their children. (17) But if they do not need to marry and procreate, is it still possible that they could engage in sexual acts? If not among themselves then with human spouses? Jude seems quite explicit on the matter: the angels left their own habitation, and gave themselves over to fornication, going after strange flesh. In other words, they were capable of performing human functions--eating, drinking, walking, talking, even sexual activity and fathering children.

The fact that angels do not marry does not in itself prove they are sexless. Throughout the Bible, angels are referred to only as men. Finis Drake writes: "It is logical to say...that the female was created specifically for the human race in order that it could be kept in existence; and that all angels were created males, in as much as their kind is kept in existence without the reproduction process. Angels were created innumerable to start with (Hebrews 12:22) whereas, the human multitudes began with one pair." (18) Even in the next world, when the saints will dwell in their resurrection body and live forever, it does not imply that they will be sexless. The Bible teaches that everyone will have his own body in the resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:35-38). No suggestion is made that they will be unsexed. Furthermore, Christ remained a man after His resurrection.


One other question has been raised. If the fallen angels who lusted after women of Earth in Genesis 6 have been interred in Tartarus with "everlasting chains," how does one explain the demons who have been operating since then? They seemed to have been quite active during the ministry of Jesus, and are busy again in our day. Following this reasoning, some share the conclusion of Kent Philpott:  However one might wish to interpret Genesis 6: 1-4 to link this passage with the verses in 2 Peter and Jude seems to post far more problems than it would solve. But 2 Peter 2.4 and Jude 6 clearly assert that the rebellious angels are being kept prisoner in the "nether gloom." If they are prisoners, they could not very well function as the demons are described as functioning in the New Testament. (19)  But Philpott failed to see that there are two categories of fallen angels: Those cast out of Heaven with Lucifer, and who are still free to torment mankind; and those who fell the second time by committing carnal acts with the daughters of men. The spirits in this second category are those chained in the nether regions. 

It seems clear to me that the "sons of God" are none other than fallen angels, and, because of their further sin of lusting after the "daughters of men," many (of the responsible angels) were imprisoned by God. Both the near annihilation of the human race and the incarceration of the fallen angels in Tartarus indicate the magnitude of the sin they committed. By such drastic judgment, God saved the human race from a calamity worse than the physical death originally imposed upon them.


l. Matthew Henry's Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1961).
2. Aurelius Augustine, The City of God (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1949), Transl. Marcus Dods.
3. Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, Volume 2. (Dallas: Dallas Seminary Press, 1947), p. 23.
4. Kenneth S. Wuest, Word Studies in the Greek N.T (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1966), Vol. 4, p. 240.
5. Ibid., p. 240.
6. Ibid., p. 241.
7. Unger, Biblical Demonology (Wheaton: Van Kampen Press, 1957), p. 48.
8 W. F. Allbright, From the Stone Age to Christianity (Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1940), p. 226.
9. Bemard J. Bamberger, Fallen Angels (Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1952), p. 53.
10. Philo, DeGigantibus, pp. 58-60.
11. The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 8, pp. 85 and 273.
12. Ibid., p. 190.
13. Josephus, The Work of Flavius Josephus; Antiquities of the Jews (London: G. G. Rutledge), 1.3.1.
14. Joseph Hall, Contemplations (Otisville, Michigan: Baptist Book Trust, 1976), p. 10.
15. Companion Bible (Oxford University Press). Appendix 26.
16. The Gospel Truth Magazine, Vol. 18, (June 1978), No. 7.
17. Dr. Morgenstem, Hebrew Union College Annual, XIV, 29- 40,114ff.
18. Finis Dake, Annotated Reference Bible, p.63.
19. Kent Philpott, A Manual of Demonology and the Occult (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1973), pp. 77-78.

Appendix H


By Will Hart

Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 9, Number 3 (April-May 2002)

The public does not seem at all aware of the fact that the scientific establishment has a double standard when it comes to the free flow of information. In essence, it goes like this... Scientists are highly educated, well trained and intellectually capable of processing all types of information, and they can make the correct critical distinctions between fact and fiction, reality and fantasy. The unwashed public is simply incapable of functioning on this high mental plane.

The noble ideal of the scientist as a highly trained, impartial, apolitical observer and assembler of established facts into a useful body of knowledge seems to have been shredded under the pressures and demands of the real world. Science has produced many positive benefits for society; but we should know by now that science has a dark, negative side. Didn't those meek fellows in the clean lab coats give us nuclear bombs and biological weapons? The age of innocence ended in World War II.

That the scientific community has an attitude of intellectual superiority is thinly veiled under a carefully orchestrated public relations guise. We always see Science and Progress walking hand in hand. Science as an institution in a democratic society has to function in the same way as the society at large; it should be open to debate, argument and counter-argument. There is no place for unquestioned authoritarianism. Is modern science meeting these standards?

In the Fall of 2001, PBS aired a seven-part series, titled Evolution. Taken at face value, that seems harmless enough. However, while the program was presented as pure, objective, investigative science journalism, it completely failed to meet even minimum standards of impartial reporting. The series was heavily weighted towards the view that the theory of evolution is "a science fact" that is accepted by "virtually all reputable scientists in the world", and not a theory that has weaknesses and strong scientific critics.

The series did not even bother to interview scientists who have criticisms of Darwinism: not "creationists" but bona fide scientists. To correct this deficiency, a group of 100 dissenting scientists felt compelled to issue a press release, "A Scientific Dissent on Darwinism", on the day the first program was scheduled to go to air. Nobel nominee Henry "Fritz" Schaefer was among them. He encouraged open public debate of Darwin's theory:

Some defenders of Darwinism embrace standards of evidence for evolution that as scientists they would never accept in other circumstances.

We have seen this same "unscientific" approach applied to archaeology and anthropology, where "scientists" simply refuse to prove their theories yet appoint themselves as the final arbiters of "the facts". It would be naive to think that the scientists who cooperated in the production of the series were unaware that there would be no counter-balancing presentation by critics of Darwin's theory.

Richard Milton is a science journalist. He had been an ardent true believer in Darwinian doctrine until his investigative instincts kicked in one day. After 20 years of studying and writing about evolution, he suddenly realised that there were many disconcerting holes in the theory. He decided to try to allay his doubts and prove the theory to himself by using the standard methods of investigative journalism.

Milton became a regular visitor to London's famed Natural History Museum. He painstakingly put every main tenet and classic proof of Darwinism to the test. The results shocked him. He found that the theory could not even stand up to the rigours of routine investigative journalism.

The veteran science writer took a bold step and published a book titled The Facts of Life: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism. It is clear that the Darwinian myth had been shattered for him, but many more myths about science would also be crushed after his book came out. Milton says:

I experienced the witch-hunting activity of the Darwinist police at first hand. It was deeply disappointing to find myself being described by a prominent Oxford zoologist [Richard Dawkins] as "loony", "stupid" and "in need of psychiatric help" in response to purely scientific reporting. (Does this sound like stories that came out of the Soviet Union 20 years ago when dissident scientists there started speaking out?)

Dawkins launched a letter-writing campaign to newspaper editors, implying that Milton was a "mole" creationist whose work should be dismissed. Anyone at all familiar with politics will recognise this as a standard Machiavellian by-the-book "character assassination" tactic. Dawkins is a highly respected scientist, whose reputation and standing in the scientific community carry a great deal of weight.

According to Milton, the process came to a head when the London Times Higher Education Supplement commissioned him to write a critique of Darwinism. The publication foreshadowed his coming piece: "Next Week: Darwinism - Richard Milton goes on the attack". Dawkins caught wind of this and wasted no time in nipping this heresy in the bud. He contacted the editor, Auriol Stevens, and accused Milton of being a "creationist", and prevailed upon Stevens to pull the plug on the article. Milton learned of this behind-the-scenes backstabbing and wrote a letter of appeal to Stevens. In the end, she caved in to Dawkins and scratched the piece.

Imagine what would happen if a politician or bureaucrat used such pressure tactics to kill a story in the mass media. It would ignite a huge scandal. Not so with scientists, who seem to be regarded as "sacred cows" and beyond reproach. There are many disturbing facts related to these cases. Darwin's theory of evolution is the only theory routinely taught in our public school system that has never been subjected to rigorous scrutiny; nor have any of the criticisms been allowed into the curriculum.

This is an interesting fact, because a recent poll showed that the American public wants the theory of evolution taught to their children; however, "71 per cent of the respondents say biology teachers should teach both Darwinism and scientific evidence against Darwinian theory". Nevertheless, there are no plans to implement this balanced approach.

It is ironic that Richard Dawkins has been appointed to the position of Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. He is a classic "Brain Police" storm trooper, patrolling the neurological front lines. The Western scientific establishment and mass media pride themselves on being open public forums devoid of prejudice or censorship. However, no television program examining the flaws and weaknesses of Darwinism has ever been aired in Darwin's home country or in America. A scientist who opposes the theory cannot get a paper published.

The Mysterious Origins of Man was not a frontal attack on Darwinism; it merely presented evidence that is considered anomalous by the precepts of his theory of evolution.

Returning to our bastions of intellectual integrity, Forest Mims was a solid and skilled science journalist. He had never been the centre of any controversy and so he was invited to write the most-read column in the prestigious Scientific American, "The Amateur Scientist", a task he gladly accepted. According to Mims, the magazine's editor Jonathan Piel then learned that he also wrote articles for a number of Christian magazines. The editor called Mims into his office and confronted him.

"Do you believe in the theory of evolution?" Piel asked.

Mims replied, "No, and neither does Stephen Jay Gould."

His response did not affect Piel's decision to bump Mims off the popular column after just three articles.

This has the unpleasant odour of a witch-hunt. The writer never publicly broadcast his private views or beliefs, so it would appear that the "storm troopers" now believe they have orders to make sure "unapproved" thoughts are never publicly disclosed.


So, the monitors of "good thinking" are not just the elite of the scientific community, as we have seen in several cases; they are television producers and magazine editors as well. It seems clear that they are all driven by the singular imperative of furthering "public science education", as the president of the Cambrian Institute so aptly phrased it.

However, there is a second item on the agenda, and that is to protect the public from "unscientific" thoughts and ideas that might infect the mass mind. We outlined some of those taboo subjects at the beginning of the article; now we should add that it is also "unwholesome" and "unacceptable" to engage in any of the following research pursuits: paranormal phenomena, UFOs, cold fusion, free energy and all the rest of the "pseudo-sciences". Does this have a familiar ring to it? Are we hearing the faint echoes of religious zealotry?

Who ever gave science the mission of engineering and directing the inquisitive pursuits of the citizenry of the free world? It is all but impossible for any scientific paper that has anti-Darwinian ramifications to be published in a mainstream scientific journal. It is also just as impossible to get the "taboo" subjects even to the review table, and you can forget about finding your name under the title of any article in Nature unless you are a credentialed scientist, even if you are the next Albert Einstein.

To restate how this conspiracy begins, it is with two filters: credentials and peer review. Modern science is now a maze of such filters set up to promote certain orthodox theories and at the same time filter out that data already prejudged to be unacceptable. Evidence and merit are not the guiding principles; conformity and position within the established community have replaced objectivity, access and openness.

Appendix J

Merry Christmas, and OFF WITH YOUR HEAD!


by Carol A. Valentine
Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum
May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes


May 15, 2002 -- Why have I only now found out about this?

We can argue about who is most to blame, but the facts remain the same:  Congress and the White House have been helping to establish a theocracy in America.  That's right, in America -- the nation that used to be a land of religious freedom. 

The would-be leaders of new theocracy:

  • Want to abolish Christmas,
  • Call Christians "idol worshippers,"
  • Demand Christians give up their religion or be put to death,
  • Preach that Jesus practiced sorcery, worshipped stone idols, and was sexually immoral,
  • Want to establish a caste system in the US based on heredity and religion,
  • Want to force US citizens to embrace a synthesized "religion" invented for a servant class.

And now, since the advent of the 9-11 war, the would-be leaders of this theocracy are stronger than ever.  Little stands between them and the realization of their plans.  

This may sound incredible, but it is as real as the ground beneath your feet, and as serious as a heart attack.  I can document everything I have said.  Let me fill you in on the details.

The would-be theocratic leaders that Congress and our presidents have been promoting are members of a sect called Chabad Lubavitch, headquartered in Brooklyn, New York.  Chabad, (sometimes spelled "Habad"), is an acronym for three Hebrew words:  Chochma, Binah and Daas, which mean "wisdom, understanding and knowledge."  Chabad and Lubavitch are functionally synonymous.  Chabad describes the movement; Lubavitch is the name of the town (sometimes said to be in Lithuania, sometimes in Russia) where the movement was headquartered during the nineteenth century. Lubavitchers are a subset of the Hasidic (sometimes spelled "Chasidic") Jews. Doctrinally, Hasidic Jews rely on the Talmud, on the Zohar (the basic book of kabbalah or "calabah"),  and on the Tanya (or "Hatanya") written by the founder of the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, Rabbi Shneur Zalman.  [See Footnote 1 .]

The Chabad Lubavitchers also rely on the works of renowned Jewish teachers such as Maimonides.  Of course they rely on the Torah; but note that the word "Torah," in Jewish religious discourse, is somewhat elastic; it can denote (1) the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament), (2) the Old Testament in its entirety, (3) the Old Testament in its entirety, and the Talmud, and (4) the entire body of Jewish religious literature. 

Reviewing the above, we can see that, doctrinally, Lubavitchers are not an aberration within Judaism.  They are as much part of Judaism as the Dominicans are part of the Roman Catholic Church.  It would be misleading to call the Lubavitch movement a "cult" as some have done, without so naming mainstream Orthodox Judaism. 


For contemporary Lubavitchers, the most admired is late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the "Lubavitcher Rebbe," or simply "the Rebbe." (Jewish people call a rabbi with whom they have a close and personal relationship their "Rebbe."   Since I feel as though I have a close and personal relationship with him -- having read much about him -- and since I am not Jewish, I will use the Americanised form of the word and call Rabbi Schneerson "the Reeb." )

Some Lubavitchers consider the Reeb their Messiah and await for him to return from the dead;  other say that the Messiah is really the Jewish people themselves.  If all that is beginning to sound weird and fringy, realize that the Lubavitchers do not confine themselves to Brooklyn, New York.  They have immediate and constant access to the President of the United States: George Bush's Press Secretary, Ari Fleischer, a Reform Jew, works the Lubavitcher mission. 

The most prominent backer of the Lubavitchers on Capitol Hill is Senator Joseph Lieberman (D.Conn.), an Orthodox Jew, and the former candidate for the Vice-Presidency of the United States.  Jewish members of Congress regularly attend seminars conducted by a Washington DC Lubavitcher rabbi.  The Assistant Secretary of Defence, Paul D. Wolfowitz, the Comptroller of the US Department of Defence, Dov Zakheim (an ordained Orthodox rabbi), and Stuart Eizenstat, former Deputy Treasury Secretary, are all Lubavitcher groupies.


According to the Jerusalem Post of October 19, 2001, "Chabad is a potent force: 2,600 institutions around the world, large numbers of English-speaking rabbis, control of most of Judaism in Italy as well as the chief rabbinate of Russia (its Russia budget alone is $20 million a year). It is an organization with immense world-wide financial resources . . . In fact, Chabad is a movement of monumental importance. Observant Jews are profoundly dependent on its emissaries all over the world . . .  its rabbis dominate or are poised to dominate Jewish communities in a startling number of countries."
mirrored at:
original article at:

The Jewish Virtual Library tells a similar story: "More than 3,700 emissary couples work in more than 100 countries worldwide. Since 1995, more than 400 shlichim (emissaries) were assigned to new posts and more than 500 new Chabad institution [sic] have been established, bringing the total to nearly 2,600 institutions (seminaries, day camps, schools, etc) worldwide. According to headquarters, almost one million children participates [sic] in Chabad activities worldwide in 1999."
mirrored at:


Baruch Goldstein, the American-Israeli who shot 29 Muslims to death as they prayed during Ramadan at the al-Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron in 1994, was a Lubavitcher.  Lubavitch rabbinates are hereditary, passed from father to son, sometimes from father to son-in-law:

His [Goldstein's] family ancestry, through his mother, went back eight generations to the Baal Hatanya founder of the Lubavitch dynasty.

One Year Later -- Purim Hebron 1994 Remembered, by Dr. Manfred R. Lehmann
mirrored at:

Now back to Lubavitcher Ari Fleischer, the Bush press secretary who is one of the most active Lubavitchers in Washington, DC.  This from the (Baltimore) Jewish Times of October 26, 2001:

Like that of most high-ranking White House officials, press secretary Ari Fleischer's life has been an exhausting blur since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But he took a few hours off last week to pick up  an award from American Friends of Lubavitch, and to help boost the group's extensive Jewish outreach efforts on Capitol Hill -- efforts that Mr. Fleischer, a former congressional staffer, has supported from the beginning.

He was given the group's Young Leadership award and Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) was the night's honouree at a dinner that drew hundreds of Washington political bigwigs, Capitol Hill staffers and Washington money people. Mr. Fleischer was an early leader and co-president of Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum, which brings together lawmakers and congressional and administration staffers for Jewish events study . . . In a show of bi-partisanship, both Mr. Fleischer and Mr. Lieberman lavished praise on the active Chabad effort that emphasizes the army of young staffers in government and political jobs.

("Ari Fleischer: Reform Lubavitch," by James Besser, Baltimore Jewish Times, 10/26/2001, V.262,  N.8, p. 30. as quoted by The Jewish Tribal Review.
mirrored at:
(Original article not to hand.)

So we see the Lubavitchers are focused people, whether they're committing mass murder or controlling American Congress and the White House.


The Lubavitchers are proselytisers, but of a different sort. They want to make all Jews -- Reform, Conservative or Orthodox --hyper "Jewish."  Thus we see Orthodox Jews like Lieberman and Reform Jews like Fleischer standing side-by-side working the Lubavitcher program.  Lubavitchers don't want to convert non-Jews to Judaism -- they want Jews to understand they are a class apart from everyone else. 

In a letter he wrote in 1964, Schneerson deplored intermarriage of Jews with non-Jews, calling it "spiritual cremation," and called the concepts of freedom, equality, and integration "misconceived ideals."
mirrored at:

This is particularly amusing, inasmuch as in the Jews led the movement to forcibly integrate the South which resulted in the 1964 Civil Rights Act.  The Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism tells us that "During the Mississippi Summer of 1964, Jews made up half of the young people who volunteered in the effort to end segregation."

Obviously, integration and mixed marriages are for the Gentiles, not the Jews.  We'll see why, as we go along.


In 1995, Schneerson became the first religious leader ever to be awarded the United States  Congressional Gold Medal.  Just this March, Bush II entertained a delegation of Lubavitchers to mark  Schneerson's 100th birthday and issued a glowing statement about Schneerson in a White House Proclamation.
mirrored at:

We will have a chance to look at this more closely later, but first let's learn something of the religion the Lubavitchers have dreamed up for thee and me.


Let's start our journey at a website run by "Jews and Hasidic Gentiles—United to Save America" ("JHG-USA").  The purpose of the website is to popularise Schneerson's plans for Gentiles.   Schneerson's  plan calls for non-Jews to be converted into "Hasidic Gentiles," a lower life form in the cosmology of America's future.  The Reeb's photo is at the top left side of the homepage.
mirrored at:

In the Lubavitch cosmology, rabbis are naturally the top dogs.  Then come the rest of the Jews.  Next come former Christians or other non-Jews who have been converted to "Hasidic Gentiles;" those folk can have a share in the good life provided they forget Christ (or Buddha, etc.) and obey the laws assigned to them by the rabbis.  At the bottom of the heap are those who refuse to conform to the system; those people may be lashed, punished, and executed.  Read on.  I will support everything I have just said.

As you read the Jews and Hasidic Gentiles—United to Save America (JHG-USA) website, be aware of the sliding definitions.  The Hebrew word "Moshiach," (sometimes spelled "Mashiach"), is the word for "Messiah."   Sometimes "Moshiach" connotes a person, but often it connotes the Jewish people as a whole and the Utopia they will bring to the world through their transcendence over lesser beings.


Here is the flier the Lubavitchers are circulating.
I have cached the page at:

The ad reads: "Campaign to Abolish X-mas celebration by gentiles . . .  according to the known Jewish ruling that Christians are idol worshippers. (Likkutei Sichos 37:198)"  

What is the "Likkutei Sichos"?  Look at this page:
mirrored at:

We see that the "Likkutei Sichos" is a printed and bound anthology of talks given by Schneerson. 

O.K.  So now we have established what the Reeb thought of Christians and Christianity.  What should be done about people who follow Jesus Christ?


Go back to the anti-"X-mas" flier:
I have cached the page at:

"A gentile . . . is liable for the death penalty . . . if he has invented a religious holiday for himself . . .  The general principle is we do not allow them to make new religious rituals and to make 'mitzvahs' ["commandment;" sometimes "good deed or blessing"] for themselves by their own devices . . . if he does make some new 'mitzvah,' we lash him, punish him, and inform him that he is obligated [sic] with the death penalty for this." (Rambam Mishne Torah--Hilchose Melachim 10:9)

So Christians or non-Christian Gentiles, according to the "Rambam Mishne Torah" should be lashed, punished, and put to death if they insist on following their own religious practices, including celebration of non-Jewish religious holidays, such as Christmas.  

What is the Rambam Mischne Torah?  The Rambam is none other than Maimonides, the well-known Sephardic Jewish writer who lived in Spain between 1135 and 1204 AD, one of the great fathers of Judaic thought; the Mishne Torah is one of his best known works.  See the "Sephardic Sages" webpage,

mirrored at:

"Maimonides [Rambam] was the author of the Mishneh Torah, one of the greatest codes of Jewish law, compiling every conceivable topic of Jewish law in subject matter order and providing a simple statement of the prevailing view in plain language. In his own time, he was widely condemned because he claimed that the Mishneh Torah was a substitute for studying the Talmud," Sephardic Sages tells us.

Maimonides is regarded as a great teacher throughout Judaism.  Yet these are his words: 

" . . . A gentile . . . is liable for the death penalty . . . if he has invented a religious holiday for himself. "

So to be fair to the Reeb, the idea that Christmas celebrants be put to death did not originate with him.   Indeed, we need to go back further to understand the roots of the "Gentiles must be put to death" phenomena. 


The central book in Judaism is the Talmud, which contains the teachings of the Pharisees -- those people on whom the New Testament spends so many words.  Jesus called their teachings "the ways of men," an abomination, and he condemned them; for doing so, He was crucified.  At the time Jesus lived and up until several hundred years after His death, we are told, the teachings of the Pharisees were not written down, but were memorized, added to, and passed around by word of mouth.  This is called the "oral law."   

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.  Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence.  The Talmud is the largest and most important single piece of literature . . . and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." --Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1948, Vol. 8, pg. 474.

The original Hebrew Babylonian Talmud (Soferim 15,  Rule  10) cites Rabbi Simon ben Yohai:  "Tob shebe goyyim harog." Translation:  "Even the best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed."

This passage is not taken from the commonly available and accepted Soncino edition of the Talmud.  According to the Jewish Encyclopedia of 1903,  the phrase "the best among the Gentiles" has been altered to read "the best among the Egyptians." Quite an improvement, eh?

(See the 1903 Jewish Encyclopedia,  published  by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, "Gentile," Vol. 5, p. 617).

Thus we see that the "Gentiles must be put to death" concept was originated before the Reeb, and even before the Rambam.  The "kill all Gentiles" concept  can be found in the Talmud, the basic book of Judaism. 


See: "The Law Is Only a Minimum," and you will learn that observance of other Christian religious holidays constitute idolatry and will be banned.  Christian holidays to be banned include:

  • Good Friday
  • Easter
  • Ash Wednesday
  • All Saints Day,
  • And "probably even the 'new year.'"
mirrored at:


Later, we will learn that the "idol-worshippers" who refuse to give up their religious observances will be put to death by beheading.  But for now, be aware that Jews and Hasidic Gentiles—United to Save America (JHG-USA) are offering a special discount on those anti-"X-mas" fliers.  Normally they sell for 25 cents a piece -- now they are selling for 15 cents a piece.  Hurry to order!
mirrord at:


Bush II claims to be a Christian.  Want to know what Bush's Lubavitcher friends think about Jesus?   Read the "Who Was Jesus" page:
mirrored at:

You will see that Jesus is called a "dangerous" false prophet who "repeatedly broke the Law by committing terrible sins, while openly challenging the G-d given authority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin."

The "Who Was Jesus" page also cites the Talmud -- the references in parentheses are the specific books.  The quote begins here:

The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of 'Jesus the Nazarene':

1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a). 

2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), and was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).

3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh -- which is also explicitly banned in the Bible.  (Shabbos 104b).

Such is the blasphemy against Jesus coming from the friends of Bush II.  If Jesus Christ stepped into the America Bush is helping to create, Jesus would be put to death again -- by Jewish law.


Not only did Bush issue a proclamation, he actually held a White House reception for the Lubavitchers to celebrate the Reeb's 100th birthday. 

Bush Meets Lubavitch Rabbis to Mark Rebbe's 100th Birthday. 

U.S. President George W. Bush hosted a delegation of 10 leading rabbis and officials from the Lubavitch Hasidic movement at the White House yesterday. The 90-minute meeting took place in the framework of events organized by the movement to mark the 100th birthday of the late Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson . . . Bush added his signature to a document declaring the late Rebbe's birthday 'The day of education and charity.'  [Avraham] Rabbi Shem-Tov thanked the president for his support of Israel and presented him with a Passover Haggadah.

--Reported in Haaretz [Israeli newspaper], March 26, 2002, as quoted by The Jewish Tribal Review
mirrored at:
(Original article not to hand.)

Now let's step back for a moment and imagine we are one of these Lubavitchers at Bush's 90-minute reception on March 25.  Recall that the fundamental book of the Chabad Lubavitch movement is the Tanya or Hatanya.  The late Hebrew University professor Israel Shahak says this about the Hatanya:  

According to this book, all non-Jews are totally satanic creatures 'in whom there is absolutely nothing good.'  Even a non-Jewish embryo is qualitatively different from a Jewish one.  The very existence of a non-Jew is 'inessential,' whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews.

(Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion , Pluto Press, London, 1994, pg. 27.)

Several years later, Shahak cooperated with Norton Mezvinsky to write the "Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel." The authors said this of Schneerson:

The late, highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the 'Lubavitcher Rebbe' who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well as in the U.S., explained that, 'The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world [i.e., Gentile people] . . .  A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. It is written, ‘And the strangers shall guard and feed your flocks’ (Isaiah 61:5). The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews . . . '

("Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel," by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky.  London.  Pluto Press, 1999; as quoted by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2000.)

mirrored at:

So here is my question:  Why are these pure and G-dly Lubavitcher rabbis willing to hang out with a satanic, pork-gobbling idol-worshipper from . . .Texas?  Or was the stink of Bush's Christianity covered up by the perfume of Raw Power? 

I wonder if the rabbis explained to Bush their plans for him and his kind?  Perhaps they did not need to do that.  Perhaps George W. Bush is not really a Christian but is secretly a Hasidic Gentile.  He sure acts that way.


So we have now learned Jesus was not the Son of God, but a false prophet.  Who is the Son of God, then?

In the book of Exodus, G-d openly proclaims His son to the world: "Thus says the L-rd: My firstborn son is Israel.  'Israel' is the Jewish people -- all of them.  The Jews were chosen by G-d to be His special 'son,' to be, in the words of the Bible, 'a kingdom of priests and a holy nation' for the whole world . . .

Read "Who is the Son of G-d?"
mirrored at:

So the Jewish people -- individually and collectively -- "a kingdom of priests and an holy nation" whose jurisdiction is the whole, wide world . . .

But once more, out of fairness, I must point out that this view that the Jewish people are the Son of God is not specifically Lubavitcher.  Let's return to the Talmud once more:

If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death . . . He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, 'One who smiteth man [I.e.,  an Israelite] attacketh the Holy One.'   (Sanhedrin, 58b.)

A Jew -- any Jew -- is the Divine Presence, the Holy One.  Get it, dummy?


The Rebbe is a direct descendant of King David and has received a true prophecy from G-d that we who are alive in this generation shall be the first in history to see the coming of the true messiah.  Many Jews are eagerly anticipating the Rebbe's resurrection from the grave, ready to re-establish the Sanhedrin and anoint the king.
mirrored at:

Do you think we need courts run by rabbis to give us trials like they gave Jesus (Matt. 26:57-67)?  Do you think we need a King to rule over us?  No thank-yew.  We are AMERICANS.  We do not recognize an established state religion, and we are a republic, not a kingdom.  


In our generation, the spiritual leader of the Jewish people--and therefore of the whole world--is Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (known as the "Lubavitcher Rebbe"), in New York . . .Did you catch that -- the Reeb is the leader of the Jewish people AND THEREFORE THE WHOLE WORLD.  So now we see how the Pyramid of Power is shaking out.  From "Who is the Son of G-d?"
mirrored at:


Now let's go back in time to the reign of Bush I, when Congress passed, and Bush signed, Joint House Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14.  In House Joint Resolution 104, the birthday of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, March 26, 1991,  was designated as "Education Day, USA." You may have noticed that in 2002, the Rebbe's birthday was on March 25, not March 26.  More of that later.  Here is JHR 104, Public Law 102-14:
mirrored at:

Let's look at the first clause:

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded . . .

Ah!  You think they're going to mention, perhaps, the great Christian precept "do unto others as you would have them do unto you," or even the Ten Commandments? 

Or perhaps the principles of liberty espoused by Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, or George Mason?  Or  quote the words of Thomas Jefferson in a letter to his friend Charles Thompson, dated January 9, 1816, when he said:

I am a real Christian . . . a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus . . .

To see Jefferson's comments in context, go to: < >.

Certainly Congress had wonderful material at their fingertips to reaffirm the "ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded . . . "

But let's see what Congress did. Here is the second clause of HJR 104:

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws . . .

Naugahyde Laws?  No, that's not Naugahyde, that's Noahide . . .  Never heard of them!  What are they?


Explanation No. 1:  "Noahide" is the adjectival form of "Noah." So perhaps God passed down laws to Noah that somehow we overlooked?  No, I just scrutinized Genesis in my King James version, and on two Bible Internet search engines. God did not pass down seven laws to Noah, and Noah did not pass down seven laws to anyone else. 

Explanation No. 2: Let's go to a Lubavitcher website -- surely they know from where these laws came.
mirrored at:

All of these laws are derived from specific passages in the Torah, which G-d gave to the Jewish people at Mt. Sinai.

Let's try to be logical.  Noah lived and died in Genesis.  Mt. Sinai is not mentioned in Genesis.  Moses lived in Exodus and beyond.  God handed over the Ten Commandments to Moses at Mt. Sinai, in Exodus. Therefore God could not have given Noah these laws at Mt.  Sinai, for Noah had already died, back in Genesis. 

It seems that Bush's friends, the Lubavitchers, the people who call Jesus a false prophet and idol worshipper, can't even keep the Bible time-line straight.  I wonder what Bush's pastor would think of Bush lavishing praise on the Lubavitchers?
Explanation No. 3:  According to the  Encyclopedia Brittanica, the Talmud claims the Noahide laws were given to Adam.   ". . .  also called Noachian Laws,  a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind."

Let's be realistic.  These seven laws which God (allegedly) gave to Adam were never ever written down in the Bible.  However, the descendants of Adam passed the laws down verbally to their descendants ("oral law"), and so on and so on . . . until several hundred years after the death of Jesus the Pharisees started writing them down in the Talmud. 

If your Grandma told you a story she claimed had been passed down through the family -- orally -- from the time of Adam, would you believe her?  No, of course not.  The story is preposterous.

Explanation No. 4:  So now let's turn to the Talmud for an explanation of the Noahide laws.  In a footnote to Yebamoth 62a, the Talmud gives the Scriptural source of these seven Noahide laws:  Genesis 9:7.  In Genesis 9:7, God says to Noah: 

And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein. 

But as you can see, there is not one mention of seven laws in that verse, despite what the Talmudic sages tell us. 

Explanation No. 5:
Wait, I've overlooked something. Let's return to the Jews and Hasidic Gentiles (JHG USA) website:
mirrored at:

All of these laws are derived from specific passages in the Torah, which G-d gave to the Jewish people at Mt. Sinai.

Ah!  The operant word is "derived." The Pharisee scholars derived, or reasoned, the laws into existence.    So . . . just as Athena sprang from the head of Zeus, so the Noahide laws sprang from the heads of the Pharisees.

Naugahyde is man-made, vinyl coated-fabric; it is artificial leather.  These Noahide laws are man made, Pharisee-coated, artificial laws.  As Naugahyde is to leather, so the Noahide Laws are to the Bible.   

Explanation 6: This is proof of the pudding:  Sanhedrin 56a and 56b says:

Our Rabbis taught: seven precepts were the sons of Noah commanded: social laws; (5) to refrain from blasphemy, idolatry; adultery; bloodshed; robbery; and eating flesh cut from a living animal (1) . . .

Footnote 5, for the above passage, says: "I.e., to establish courts of justice, or, perhaps, to observe social justice (Nahmanides on Gen. XXXIV, 13): Hast. Dict. (s.v. Noachian precepts) translates 'obedience to authority.'"

Listen up here, fellow Gentile!  "Obedience to authority" is your moral duty.  Guess who the "authority" is?   

Footnote 1, for the above passage, says:

These commandments may be regarded as the foundations of all human and moral progress. Judaism has both a national and a universal outlook in life. In the former sense it is particularistic, SETTING UP A PEOPLE DISTINCT AND SEPARATE FROM OTHERS (emphasis added) by its peculiar religious law. But in the latter, it recognises that moral progress and its concomitant Divine love and approval are the privilege and obligation of all mankind. And hence the Talmud lays down the seven Noachian precepts, by the observance of which all mankind may attain spiritual perfection, and without which moral death must inevitably ensue. That perhaps is the idea underlying the assertion (passim) that a heathen is liable to death for the neglect of any of these . . .

Let's pause here for a moment and notice the phrase I put in emphasis:  " . . .  setting up a people distinct and separate from others . . . "

Now we can put at least some of it together.  The rabbis derived the Naugahyde laws from Genesis 9:7, by  which they grant to themselves the power to establish courts and demand obedience to their authority from all other races and nations.  Later on, in Exodus, God gives Moses the Ten Commandments.

You don't have to be a triple Ph.D. to figure out that, theologically speaking, laws given by God supersede any laws derived by men.  But the Pharisee Talmudists still prefer the laws derived by men (themselves.)  That's why they mention these man-made laws in JHR 104 PL 102-14 and ignore the Ten commandments.

In Footnote 5, the rabbis have granted themselves the authority  ". . .  to establish courts of justice, or, perhaps, to observe social justice . . . translates obedience to authority." In Footnote 1, " . . . That perhaps is the idea underlying the assertion (passim) that a heathen is liable to death for the neglect of any of these . . . "

Now we see why JHR 104 PL 102-14 did not cite the Ten Commandments.  The Ten Commandments don't give authority to rabbis to set up courts and rule over the rest of mankind, nor give the rabbis the authority to put to death those who will not follow their dictates.

The Naugahyde laws do exactly that.  The purpose of the Naugahyde laws is to establish the supremacy of Jews over others, under pain of death.  House Joint Resolution 104 (PL 102-14) seems to have granted the Naugahyde laws the status of THE fundamental law of the land, only to be tested by the US courts. 

Now we can also understand why, in 1964, the Reeb wrote that intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles was "spiritual cremation" for Jews, while at the same time organized Jewry was urging forced integration between Gentiles of different races.  One race/religion will be permitted to survive, and that is the race/religion of the Jews.  All Gentiles must lose their sense of belonging to a distinct race, owning a distinct culture, owning a distinct history, and practicing a distinct religion. The Gentiles must be homogenized.   The Gentiles must be made Naughahydes, and Naughahydes only. 

No White Pride.  No Black Pride.  No Yellow Pride.  That is racism.  Only Jewish Pride.  That's not racism.  That is God's will.  [Footnote 2. ]


The seven Naugahyde laws can be found here:
mirrored at:

For an insightful discussions of the Naugahyde laws, visit:

But for now visit Lubomyr Prytulak's Ukranian Archives with me.  Mr. Prytulak points out that the seven laws have "proliferated into 30, and even 66," and that "Americans may be filled with unease, or even outright trepidation, at some of these laws.  Some of the laws are mysterious . . . " See what he is talking about:
mirrored at

Now the 30 Naugahyde laws prohibit conjurers (Law 25); prohibit consulting with the dead (Law 30), and prohibit eating a limb taken from a living creature (Law 15), prohibit Molech worship (22), but permit the offering of ritual sacrifices (19). 

Phew!  That's a relief.  We might not be able to live without being permitted to offer ritual sacrifices.  

In case you think this is all funny, try this:  Rabbinical courts will administer the death penalty by decapitation (Law 16).  That's not so funny. 

In the set of 66 laws, there is a prohibition against practicing Ov (Law 7); against practicing Yiddoni (Law 9); and "Against causing our children to pass [through the fire] in the worship of Molech"  (Law 7).  So we see Molech worship is a no-no in both sets of laws -- at least for the Naugahydes.

Molech worship may not have been a big problem for Christians, but remember, it has been a big problem for the Jews.  Read Isaiah or the other Biblical prophets to corroborate this.

But don't believe for a moment that rabbis prohibit Jews from worshiping Molech.  Read the Talmud, (Sanhedrin 64a-64b) to discover the conditions under which Jews may sacrifice their children to Molech. 

The Talmud always provides a way around the rules.  That's the Talmud's job -- to split hairs and twist original intent, just as the supreme Court splits hairs and twists the original intent of our Bill of Rights.  It's a coincidence, isn't it, that Talmudist Jews are so heavily represented in American jurisprudence?   


The entry Noachidae, found in the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FREEMASONRY states the following: 'The descendants of Noah.  A term applied to Freemasons on the theory, derived from the 'legend of the craft,' that Noah was the father and founder of the Masonic system of theology.  And hence the Freemasons claim to be his descendants, because in times past they preserved the pure principles of his religion amid the corruptions of surrounding faiths.'

Notice how closely the Masonic symbol resembles the Star of David.  Trace its outlines. It resembles one half of the Star of David.  Does that make the Freemasons half-baked Jews?
(search in google cache)
mirrored at

So in their own words, Freemasons declare themselves Naugahydes.


Search for official protests to the 1991 Joint House Resolution 104 Pl 102-14 and the Congressional and Presidential endorsement of the Talmudist Noahide laws from the mainstream Christian churches, the evangelical churches, and the Catholic Church.  I could find none.  

The US Government endorsement of Talmudism should have brought cries of protest from the American Civil Liberties Union on the grounds that JHR 104 PL 102-14 violated church-state separation.  The ACLU was silent.  And what of Conservative, Reform, and Orthodox rabbis and congregations, who are so sensitive to establishment of religion when it comes to the public displays of Christmas crèches?  No, they did not object to JHR 104 either.  What of the American Jewish Congress, the Anti Defamation League, the Jewish Defence League?  Not a whisper . . . 


Ours is the last generation of the year of sin and evil and the first of the Messianic Era.  Indeed, for the first time in history, there is a growing consensus of leading rabbis willing to name the most suited to be the Messiah, and they are agreeing that he is the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson . . .
mirrored at:

In 1978, the House of Representatives declared the Reeb's 76th birthday as "Education Day, USA." According to the Chabad webpage, "President Jimmy Carter signed the proclamation into law and Education Day U.S.A. has become an annual tradition."
mirrored at:

Did you notice that Congress and Bush I celebrated "National Education Day USA" and the Reeb's birthday on March 26, 1991:
(Make sure to include the colon at the end.)
mirrored at:

Bush II celebrated the now transmogrified "National Education and Sharing Day U.S.A." and the Reeb's birthday on March 24, 2002:

If you go to: you will see Ronald Reagan (who mentioned the Naughahyde laws in his Proclamation) announced April 2, 1985, was National Education Day.  Reagan says " . . .in honour of his [the Reeb's] 83rd birthday, which falls this year on April 2 ."

March 26, March 24, April 2 . . . The Lubavitchers obviously keep the Jewish/Babylonian lunar calendar, and therefore the American presidents keep it, too. That's why the Reeb's birthday wanders and that's why National Education and Sharing Day wanders, too.     

For "Education and Sharing Day" is merely the deceitfully disguised celebration of Schneerson's birthday.  Plan on Christmas being dropped as a public holiday soon, and replaced by Schneersonmas, a/k/a Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.

OK.  All together now, let's practice : "I'm dreaming of a White Schneerson-mas . . . la la la."


Hey, let's think back to Bush's March, 2002,  proclamation again, just to savor his words . .  . words to the effect that EVERY child, no matter what his BACKGROUND, ETHNICITY, or FAITH,  get the best education possible, and Bush's praise of Schneerson in the same breath.  Schneerson was adamant: he wrote that equality was a misconceived ideal.  How the Lubavitchers must have laughed and joked among themselves after they left the pork-gobbler's little party on March 25.

Later on, we will have a chance to examine the Lubavitcher's own ideas about education.  Once we do, you'll probably laugh at George Bush with the Lubavitchers  -- he is one dumb pork-gobbler.


Many people migrated to America to escape the tyranny of the Old World's ubermensch-
untermensch social system.  My European ancestors did so.  America was long cherished, not just for its liberties, but as a land of opportunity.  One could rise to any social status on the basis of skill and hard work because America was free and had no caste system. 

Now Bush II is helping to destroy whatever remains of that open system.  The Lubavitchers and their Jewish establishment backers intend to set up a caste system, with Jews at the top of the heap. They'll have us believe it is God's will, of course.  Here is a sample: The Ten Commandments apply only to the Jews.

At Mt. Sinai, G-D gave the Ten commandments (and hundreds of others) to the Jewish people. These laws apply only to the Jews in their special role as the world's spiritual leaders.

From "Who is the Son of G-D?'

The Law contains two parallel (but separate) paths for the world: 613 commandments for the Jews, and 66 commandments (contained in the 7 Noachide Laws) for gentiles . .  . Non-Jews may not observe Shabbos (or holidays) in the manner of Jews . . . or be called up for a public Torah reading in a synagogue.

From "The Law is Only a Minimum,"
mirrored at:

So here we have more of the same: The two-tier society, Jews on the top tier, Gentiles on the bottom. 

These Seven Commandments (mitzvos) [the seven Naugahyde laws] are not arbitrary laws, but rather G-d's plan for Mankind . . . (The Seven Universal Laws of Noah have only been replaced for the Jewish people, to whom G-D gave the entire Torah [teaching] as their Law.  They therefore have a special responsibility--with special commandments--to be the priesthood of the world, a 'light unto nations.')

(Notice that "Torah" in this context means the entire body of Jewish teachings.)

From "What is Noah's Covenant?"
mirrored at:

That's why the Jews who run the American Civil Liberties Union don't want the Ten Commandments posted in public places.  The Ten Commandments are not public property -- they are owned by the Jews.   Let the Gentiles eat Naugahyde Laws.

How long will it be before Jews complain of copyright infringement when Gentiles quote the Ten Commandments?


The Noahide communities require . . . . courts of justice, led by rabbinically trained righteous judges, which will function similarly to Jewish batei dinim [Jewish courts] . . .

From "The Final War for Jerusalem (Why Permanent Israeli Victory Is Now Within Reach)"
mirrored at:

A search of the Talmud's Sanhedrin reveals that a Naugahyde is to be tried by one judge, on the testimony on one witness only, and is executed even if no formal admonition preceded his offence.  On the other hand a Jew is tried by a court of 23, on the testimony of at least two, and executed only after formal admonition.  (Footnote 5 of Sanhedrin 71b.)


The Naugahyde children must be kept ignorant.  That's the system in slave-based societies, of course. 

Right now, a supplemental daily home-schooling Torah program is being developed and used to teach Noachide children . . . This approach to education . .. drastically minimizes secular studies (math, science, history, English, social studies, computers & other technical studies) in favour of total immersion in Torah, the Word of G-d.

"The Law is Only a Minimum,"
mirrored at:

Not just socially, but technically and economically the Naughahydes are the bottom dogs.  Without racial, cultural, or historical identity, they are the servant class.  Left only with the Naughahyde Laws -- remember, the Ten Commandments and all the rest are for Jews only -- how much "total immersion in Torah" will the Naughahydes get?

Contrast this to Bush's 2002 Schneerson Birthday Proclamation:

America's future depends in part on ensuring that EVERY child in America receives a quality education . . . Education has always played a vital role in the success of our Nation.  It has provided hope through the principle that ANY citizen can realize the American dream, regardless of BACKGROUND, ETHNICITY, or FAITH. (Emphases added.)
mirrored at:

What a bold lie.  Bush is praising the universality of education on Schneerson-mas -- when Schneerson's followers want universality of education destroyed.



Now let's revisit the influence the Lubavitchers have in this country.  On July 3, 1999, The Washington Post ran an article entitled "Hasidic Outpost In D.C. (New Lubavitch Center Raises Profile of Popular Director)."

The American Friends of Lubavitch has opened a $2 million center in Washington's embassy district, solidifying the Hasidic sect's presence in the diplomatic community and increasing the visibility of its director, Levi Shemtov, already considered by many to be the unofficial rabbi of Capitol Hill . . .

Most Washingtonians familiar with Shemtov know him for his work on the Hill.  He meets privately with Jewish members of Congress and staffers--almost always at their invitation--and holds monthly or bimonthly Capitol Jewish Forums on such issues as ethics, holiday traditions and the relationship between religion and government . . . [Rep.]  Cardin, 55, called Shemtov "a real asset for the Jewish members and Jewish staffers on the Hill . . .

From the context, it would seem these Capitol Jewish Forums to discuss "the relationship between religion and government" are held in Capitol Hill meeting rooms; that is, public facilities are being used for brainstorming sessions on how to turn America into a Talmudist theocracy.

I can enlighten you on the "relationship between religion and government" that will pertain in the new theocracy: High priests will run the courts and pronounce death sentences and our prayers will be subject to government laws.  For Jews, their religion and government are synonymous.

Last September, when Republican House leaders scheduled votes on the impeachment of President Clinton during High Holy Days, Shemtov visited the office of Rep. Richard K. Armey (R-Tex.) and persuaded him to change the schedule . . ( )

Incredible.  Here we have a Constitutional crisis in our country, a crisis for which Congress was putting aside all other national business to consider.  Yet Congress changed the date of a vote to impeach the President of the United States because a Lubavitch rabbi, scarcely 30 years old, asked them to do so. 

The  Lubavitchers expect the Gentiles to "respect" Jewish religious holidays, but they would have Christians put to death for observing Christmas.  See how "Equal Justice Under Law" works for Jews?
The Post features two colour photos of the "unofficial rabbi" of Capitol Hill, a dweebie-looking, even-featured young man with a fuzzy black beard.  Beside him, we see the menacing glance of the Reeb, schneering down from a portrait on the wall.


On October 22, 20001, The Jerusalem Post also paid a gushing tribute to Shemtov.  There's nobody who doesn't love him, it seems.  In Washington, he is very popular with the whores on both sides of the street.

'In political Washington, it's very easy to get caught up in your job,' says Ari Feischer, Republican presidential nominee George W. Bush' spokesman, who met Shemtov while working for a Republican senator from New Mexico.  'Your focus can wander from your religion.  He made it easy for me to find even more of a Jewish life on the Hill.'

Adds Thomas Kahn, House Budget Committee Democratic Staff Director and a frequent guest at Shemtov's Shabbat dinners, which famously bring together Jews who could be natural political adversaries on CNN's Crossifre during the week: 'There's nobody who is more widely respected and warmly received in Congress, the administration, and the diplomatic corps.  A large part of it is just his force of personality and also a tribute to Habad.'

I have captured the October 22, 2000, Jerusalem Post article, curiously titled: "Miriam Frifeature, send to EDITORS/FRIDAY FEATURES AFTER PROOF," at:
(or try google cache.  Mirrored at:)


By now we have seen extraordinary things:  American presidents and the American Congress are setting up a theocratic, non-Biblical, Talmudic state that will replace the one founded in 1789.  Americans will be ruled by Jews.  Christmas, Easter, Good Friday -- certainly Ramadan -- will be outlawed.  If citizens don't follow the synthetic religion designed for them by rabbis, they will be beheaded.  What else is there to learn?

Now you are ready to read
"The Final War for Jerusalem
Why Permanent Israeli Victory Is Now Within Reach"

mirrored at:

Much of this article is a paranoiac rant about the persecution of the Jews: Karl Marx wanted the Jewish nation destroyed, and the Commies have been after them ever since.  Stalin ordered the Commies to bring Hitler to power, and helped Hitler implement the Holocaust.  American Presidents have been/are conspiring against the Jews.  Amaleks have been conspiring to take the Jews out for thirty-three continuous centuries, etc.  Finally we read the truest statement on JHG-USA website:


"In simple terms, we are at war.  It is not a struggle merely for power, wealth, or some other material advantage; it is a titanic clash over the future of world civilization . . .  This war has already spread into every nation, ever social institution, every human activity.  It has thus become a world war in the ultimate sense," say the Lubavitchers.
mirrored at:

Well, that clears matters up.  Jews are going to wipe out all other civilizations in the world and replace them with one of their own design.  They intend to rule the world. 

The Jewish people have the unique power of victory, to liberate the world from its current road to complete self-destruction.  Since we are now in the last generation of the Jewish exile and the first generation of Moshiach our actions are guaranteed to produce miraculous success.


But there is not a sufficient number of Jews to bring about global victory of the Jews over others.  Weenies are needed to help.  Now we see the purpose of the Naugahydes:

And as the Lubavitcher Rebbe has explained, by transforming the gentiles we can quickly create a vast army of supporters who will help us reveal Moshiach [Messiah: that is, the Jewish people] and bring all Jews back to the Torah. 

Specifically, the Rebbe has emphasized that the 'peace process' in Israel will be defeated only through our influence on the gentiles — especially through the campaign to teach the Noachide Laws (see Sichos in English, vol. 16, [19 Kislev 5743]). 


Note, above:  The Reeb demanded the Middle East peace process must be "defeated." Allan Brownfeld Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2000 says:

Rabbi Schneerson always supported Israeli wars and opposed any retreat. In 1974 he strongly opposed  the Israeli withdrawal from the Suez area. He promised Israel divine favours if it persisted in occupying the land. After his death, thousands of his Israeli followers played an important role in the election victory of Binyamin Netanyahu. Among the religious settlers in the occupied territories, the Chabad Hassids constitute one of the most extreme groups. Baruch Goldstein, the mass murderer of Palestinians, was one of them.

As you will see below, two prominent Jews in the Department of Defence -- Assistant Secretary of Defence Paul Wolfowitz and DoD Comptroller Rabbi Dov Zakheim, pay public homage to the Lubavitchers and share public podiums with them at their events.  Does that help to explain why there is no peace in the Middle East?  On the basis of this admonition from Schneerson, who is the aggressor?

Clearly stated, then, the synthetic Naughahyde religion has another practical advantage: It ensures Gentile Americans are politically motivated to endorse the genocide of the Palestinians.


How will this Final War for Jerusalem be fought?  First, the opposing forces will disappear.

The Messiah [the Jews] will teach the Word of G-d to all nations, causing Christianity and other religions to disappear.  The bible says that everyone will become a Hasidic Gentile . . .

"Who is the Son of G_d?"
mirrored at:

Now we see what role the Gentiles in the US military will play in the "Final War for Jerusalem." The US military will help Islam to "disappear." 

On September 11, 2001, remote-controlled planes were used to crash into the WTC and Pentagon sites.  The hits were carried out with the full knowledge and consent of the North American Aerospace Command and blamed on Muslim terrorists.

The significance of the 9-11 terror becomes more obvious each day.  The purpose of the 9-11 terror was to springboard the "Final War for Jerusalem."

Yet without presenting any evidence or granting due process in any recognized court of law, Bush & Company declared the terrorist acts were committed by Muslims, and bombed Afghanistan.  Meanwhile, in Palestine, the Israelis began to move their tanks into the West Bank in the "Final War for Jerusalem."


On December 9, 2001, the US Assistant Secretary of Defence, Paul D. Wolfowitz, who gives public lip service to the Middle-East "peace process," lit the "National Menorah" on the Ellipse.  He shared the podium with Lubavitch Rabbis Abraham Shemtov and Levi Shemtov.  Levi Shemtov, of course, is the unofficial rabbi of Capitol Hill, the rabbi acclaimed by the Washington Post and the Jerusalem Post.   The lighting of the menorah was reported by the Washington Post, "The Warm Glow of Hope," December 10, 2001. 

The Post quotes one of the attendees: "This year, it's more important than ever to celebrate our freedom.   . . It's important for my kids to see that we can practice our religion openly in this country."

Yet if the Lubavitchers have their way, Christians and Muslims will be put to death for practicing their religions in this country.  And George Bush, the "Christian," honours the Lubavitch Rebbe as a great humanitarian.  If Jews think Gentiles are cattle willing to be led to slaughter, can you blame them?

Come to think of it -- we have just read about a high US official lighting the National Menorah.  Have you read any articles about high US officials visiting the National Nativity Crèche?  In fact, do we even have a National Nativity Crèche?  No, that would violate the principle of the separation of church and state. Right?


As Christianity spirals downward into strife and theological confusion, it becomes a vacuum unable to defend itself against either the lies of Amalek [members of an ancient nomadic tribe reputedly descended from Esau's grandson] or the truth of Torah.  Amalek can exploit the worldwide collapse of Christianity only by default — that is, only when the Jewish people do not seize the unprecedented opportunity.

" . .  essentially all six billion gentiles are quite ready to ask the Jews for spiritual leadership in these times of darkness," we are informed. 

Nearly two-thirds of Americans describe themselves as 'born-again' or fundamentalist Christians, most of whom believe that the coming of the Messiah is imminent (despite their confusion as to his identity), and that, as the Bible clearly prophesied, the forces of evil are waging war against Israel.

However, "In essence, the Torah is showing us that Moshiach cannot come until tile (sic) entire world- including the gentile nations--is ready.  On the other hand, the gentiles are essentially ready now, requiring only a small Jewish effort to complete the task."
mirrored at:


Let me repeat those words from the page above:   "While Christianity spirals downward into strife and theological confusion . . .  all six billion gentiles are quite ready to ask the Jews for spiritual leadership in these times of darkness."

People like Dr. Laura Schlessinger have an important role to play in this scenario.   Dr.  Laura, of course, is a famous talk show host who defends so-called traditional values.  She has been an outspoken critic of homosexuality, pornography, sex before marriage, etc. etc., and a defender of all that is Good And Holy.   For this she is very popular with Catholic and Protestant Christians. 

Meanwhile, Dr. Laura publicly proclaims that she follows Orthodox Judaism.  What does Orthodox Judaism have in common with the so-called traditional Christian values Dr. Laura champions? 

Turn to Sanhedrin 54b to see just one of the many Talmudic discussions of pederasty.  Rabbis Rab and Samuel are arguing about sex with children.   Rab's words are followed by footnote, as follows:

Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. (2).

We now turn to Footnote 2:

I.e. Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred.  Samuel makes three the minimum.

This from another subdivision of the Talmud, the Kethuboth (11b). 

When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [less than three years old] it is as if one puts the finger into the eye . . .

Another footnote explains that as "tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

Remember, Dr. Laura is an Orthodox Jew.  Orthodox Jews accept the teachings of the Talmud as the righteous interpretation of Scripture.  In practice, it replaces the Scripture.  Yet while she is on the air, Dr. Laura does not tell her listeners that the theology of her religion permits the sexual abuse of young children.  Surely her listeners would be interested in knowing.

Dr. Laura is a Chabad Lubavitcher.  According to an article cited in the Jewish Tribal Review, she and her family attend the Chabad of the Conejo, in Agoura, California.
mirrored at:

Dr. Laura fills a void for those who believe in "traditional values," of course.  I know a number of "traditional value" Christians who look up to Dr. Laura. 

Dr. Laura fills a void for those who believe in "traditional values," of course.  I know a number of "traditional value" Christians who look up to Dr. Laura.  Dr. Laura is on national radio to offer "spiritual leadership" to these Gentiles, holding out Judaism as a wonderful ideal.  But she is a Judas goat, preparing her listeners to be led into their Naugahyde pens.  Do you notice how much wiser she is than all the dummies who call it?  Dr. Laura is an important player in the Lubavitch program.

Now let's see how the leadership of one denomination of Christians, Roman Catholic Church and  Pope John Paul II, is helping the Lubavitchers with their program on another front.


When referring to Christianity disappearing, no doubt the Lubavitchers are referring to preachers like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robinson who have done much to convert American Protestant Christianity into worship of the state of Israel.  See:

But the Lubavitchers have other friends, working from the inside, making sure Christianity "spirals downward into strife and theological confusion." Recall that earlier in this article, we learned from the Jerusalem Post of October 19, 2001,  that the Chad Lubavitchers control most of Judaism in Italy.  With this in mind, meet Pope John Paul II.

"For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he . .  .
--Proverbs 23:7.

Being Jewish is a mental state, sometimes induced by an inherited family culture, sometimes induced by believing lies concerning Jewish history and Jewish religion, or sometimes induced by imbibing too much popular culture and TV.

This writer was brought up in the Roman Catholic Church when Catholics were taught their Church was the one, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church; that the Pope was Christ's Vicar on Earth and that he sat on the throne of Peter.  Whether or not one agrees with the teaching, it is clear as a bell. 

Please read a 1999 biography on Pope John Paul II, "The early years: an unhappy childhood."
mirrored at:


In that CNN article we are told this Pope, Christ's Vicar on earth, calls Jews "our elder brothers." This is a metaphor: younger brothers of course look up to elder brothers because elder brothers have something to teach.  The word "our" of course connotes Catholics or Christians: those who follow Jesus Christ. 

Christians believe Jesus was God made flesh, and that he was not conceived in the ordinary manner. Mary's virginity is one of the fundamentals tenets of Christianity.  It is part of the Apostle's Creed.  Jesus was "born of the Holy Ghost, conceived of the Virgin Mary . . . "

But Jews don't believe that.  They believe Jesus was conceived in the ordinary manner.  Not only that, but the Jewish belief is that the Virgin Mary was a harlot, that she "played the harlot with carpenters," (Sanhedrin 106a).  There are many such references to Mary's sluttish character in the Talmud and other religious Jewish writings.

The Jewish legends in regard to Jesus are found in three sources, each independent of the others--(1) the New Testament apocrypha and Christian polemical works, (2) in the Talmud and the Midrash, and (3) in the life of Jesus  ("Toledot Yeshu") that originated in the Middle Ages.  There is the tendency of all thee sources to belittle the person of Jesus ascribing to him illegitimate birth, magic, and a shameful death. (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, VOL 7, pg. 170.)

Moreover, the people Pope John Paul II calls "elder brothers" -- today's Jews -- belong to a religion that "traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees."  (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1948, Vol. 8, pg. 474.)

John Paul II pays homage to those who had Christ put to death 2,000 years ago, and, as we have seen in this examination, have stated their intention to put his followers to death as soon as they are in power. 

Those who deny Jesus Christ, who call him a bastard born of a harlot, a false prophet, a sorcerer, and idol-worshipper -- cannot be the "elder brothers" of those who believe he is the Son of God and follow Him, despite what the Pope says. 


Those who will wish to defend Pope John Paul II may tell you, "Gee, he just didn't know all of that . . ." Such a statement would be disingenuous.  The Pope is Polish, and the Polish Catholics and Polish Jews have had a somewhat tortured history.  It is highly unlikely that, as a Polish Catholic prelate, he would have been ignorant of Jewish beliefs.  And even if he was ignorant of Jewish beliefs when he was elected, he has lived in the Vatican for years.  The Vatican is a storehouse for Church history, staffed by some of the most erudite Catholic scholars in the world.  No, that excuse won't fly.


On November 29, 2001, the British newspaper, The Independent, published an article.  The title merits our close examination: 

"Publishing's new sensation: Dead Sea Scrolls. Source material: The blockbuster papyrus that exposed Mary and shocked theologians -- now available in 37 scholarly volumes."
mirrored at:

Notice the phrase  " . . .  that exposed Mary and shocked theologians . . . "

So the Blessed Virgin Mary is being exposed -- as what?  And why would theologians be "shocked"?  These sound like headlines on a supermarket tabloid.  What are we in for?

The article goes on to say said that the Qumran Project of the Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, which has been studying the scrolls for years, recently concluded that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was not a virgin. 

The completion of publication is a landmark for academics and for Christians and Jews, whose most dearly held beliefs have been challenged by the scrolls -- including that of the Virgin birth of Christ, which arose from the use of the word for virgin in early Greek versions of the Bible.  The scrolls reveal that this was a mistranslation: the original Hebrew word used simply meant young woman.

When you read the entire article, you will notice that the reporter does not mention ONE Jewish belief that is being "challenged" by the scrolls -- the only belief being challenged is one that is fundamental to Christianity. 

If you visit the URL for the Oxford Centre's Qumran Project, you will learn that the scrolls are being published, and that the editor in chief is Professor Emanuel Tov of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
mirrored at:

The Independent mentions that the Oxford Centre's Qumran research director is Geza Vermes, and that the scrolls are under the control of the Antiquities Authority of Israel.

You can see a listing of the Oxford Centre's staff here:
mirrored at:

The president is Peter Oppenheimer; the staff:  Glenda Abramson,  Martin Goodman, Ronald L. Nettler, Emanuele Ottolenghi,  David Rechter,  Alison G. Salvesen, Joseph Sherman, Piet W. van Boxel,  Joanna Weinberg, Tali Argov, John Elwolde, Miri Freud-Kandel, Kerstin Hoge, Jeremy Schonfield, Norman Solomon, and Sara Sviri.  As of this writing, the photos of these individuals appear on the Oxford Centre URL given above.  Many of the staff people are experts in Talmudic or Rabbinical studies.  Many of the staff people are Jews.  All in all, the Dead Sea Scrolls project is a Jewish/Israeli/Talmudic project.

These Jews and Israelis now challenge the translation of a single word.  For 2,000 years, the word has been translated as "virgin."  Now it means "young woman." The Independent's headlines tell us this has "exposed" Mary.  Exposed her as what?  Perhaps -- exposed her as not a virgin; perhaps -- exposed her as someone who "played the harlot with carpenters," just as the Talmud says?


What did the Vatican do in face of this "discovery"?  According to The Independent:

Now the completion of the scrolls' publication coincides with an admission by the Vatican that it is to revise parts of the Bible accordingly, a task likely to take five years.

We await to learn how the Vatican will explain away Luke 1:34, wherein Mary talks about her virginity in no uncertain terms. When told of her pregnancy, Mary says:

How shall this be, seeing I know not a man. (Luke 1:34)

If the Vatican is willing to rewrite the Catholic Bible to accommodate the Talmudists who run the Dead Sea Scrolls project, Talmudists who believe Mary was a harlot and Jesus was a bastard, we are on a slippery slope.  It's easy to see where it's going and what the Vatican will  do to the Apostles' Creed, give or take a few years:  I can see it now:

"I believe in God, the Father Almighty,
    the Creator of heaven and earth,
    and in Jesus Christ, who was really an ordinary human bastard: 
Who was conceived by an unknown person,
  And born of to a harlot by the name of Mary . . . "

Remember what we read above about Christianity spiralling "downward into strife and theological confusion, becoming a vacuum unable to defend itself . . ." You see it happening before your eyes, with a little help from the inside.


Realize that by calling Jews "our elder brothers," the Pope is repeating the Lubavitcher line, taken straight from the Lubavitcher program:  "All people are G-d's children, of course, but the Jews are like a 'firstborn son' who brings G-d's word to his younger brothers . . . "
mirrored at:


As the Christian doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus Christ is being destroyed, so also are the relics of His birthplace being destroyed.  For information on the Pope's role in the staged siege of the Church of the Nativity media event:


Now if the Pope is following the Lubaviticher program for world domination -- and he seems to be doing so -- you can bet the Lubavitchers are providing a smokescreen to hide the Papal role -- and they seem to be doing so.  What better smokescreen than a staged "struggle" between Jews and the Pope/Vatican? 

Visit the Jewish Tribal Review.  It hosts a page that is devoted to reproducing stories about this so called struggle, all the while failing to mention Papal and Vatican cooperation with the Lubavitcher program as I have outlined above.  The URL to visit is this one:

When I visited the page on May 10, this story was one of the features:

Two Held for Curse Ritual Against the Pope
Jerusalem Post
March 23, 2000

Former Habad activist Meir Baranes of Safed, who was arrested on Tuesday on suspicion of putting a religious curse on Pope John Paul II, was remanded for five days yesterday by the Acre Magistrate's Court.  A second suspect was arrested yesterday, and will be brought for remand today. Three haredim took part in the pulsa de nura ('lashes of fire') ceremony in a Safed cemetery, aired on Channel 2 on Monday just before the pope's arrival and broadcast on foreign networks worldwide.  Police are searching for a third suspect. Last night, Itim reported that police investigators suspect that the ceremony was staged in cooperation with Channel 2, which denied the charge . . .  The midnight rite, which Channel 2 said was enacted last Thursday in a cemetery in Safed, recalled rabbinical curses cast on prime minister Yitzhak Rabin prior to his 1995 assassination by Yigal Amir. Participants in the ceremony, sounding ritual calls on ceremonial ram's horns, cursed the pope as a 'hater of Israel.'

There are a number of remarkable aspects of the story.  The first is that those who performed the curse were well-connected enough to have the performance aired on Channel 2 in Jerusalem and then on foreign TV networks throughout the world.  The alleged culprit(s) were not insignificant cranks; these people were well-connected to the world-wide Jewish media infrastructure.  The second remarkable feature is that  the state of Israel would grant enough credence to "a religious curse" to arrest anyone for its performance. 

I found the complete Jerusalem Post story on Usenet archives, and have reproduced it here:

Note that curser Meir Baranes is described as an expelled Habad member.  The alleged expulsion gives Habad deniability, of course.  And it gives the world the impression that there is Jewish opposition to the Catholicism of Pope John Paul II; no one notices that he is following the Lubavitch program.  Everyone wins including the Pope and the Vatican.  Full deniability all the way around.

mirrored at:

When you re-read the above-cited article, you will also learn John Paul II was the first Pope to visit a synagogue, the first to visit Auschwitz, that he did not share the "anti-Semitic" views of many other Poles, one of his playmates was a Jew, etc.  That Jewish playmate is quoted:

The people in the Vatican do not know Jews, and previous popes did not know Jews, but this pope is a friend of the Jewish people because he knows Jewish people.

The Pope's boyhood friend is an ignoramus or a liar.  Many Popes in history knew "the Jewish people," and knew what made them tick.  

From the time of Pope Innocent III, the Talmud was burned at the stake in nearly every century from the 11th to the 18th in Italy, France, Germany, Spain, and may other countries . . .  (Babylonian Talmud, Rodkinson translation, "The History of The Talmud," pg. 2 of Introduction. )

But this CNN biography of the Pope would have us believe John Paul II is ignorant of the history of the Roman Catholic Church and its confrontation with the Talmud and Talmudists.  If John Paul was so ignorant of Church history when he was a Polish prelate, surely one of the cardinals on the permanent Vatican staff would have tapped him on the shoulder by now and clued him in. 


The Pope and Vatican officials are clearly cooperating in another campaign to make  Christianity disappear.  The Catholic policies on priests who break their vows of celibacy -- whether with women, young boys, or great woolly mammoths -- has been established by the Vatican for centuries. Priests are not permitted to do that sort of thing, and their bishops are not supposed to look the other way when they find out about it.  Catholics are expected to obey the laws of God and His Church, and the law of the land, in that order.

If Catholic priests and prelates in the US have not been doing their jobs, there is no need to stage a media event.  The proper policies should now be applied with penalties, as appropriate. Certainly the Roman Catholic Church has the infrastructure to make these corrections.   In a world full of telephones, faxes, and e-mail interfaces, there is no need to have the American cardinals travel to Rome to meet with the Pope and stage a media event. 

But on April 24, 2002, both the Washington Post and the Washington Times carried a front-page, large collared photos of the Pope, head characteristically lopped over to one side, sitting on a dais flanked on either side by at least a dozen and a half cardinals. The caption under the Washington Times photo reads: "Vatican voice: Pope John Paul II addressed the closed-door meeting with American cardinals yesterday . . . "

But the meeting was not "closed door" at all.  The Associated Press was invited inside the private library; the Pope and cardinals posed in their respective positions before the picture was shot.  A double paged, almost identical photo appeared in the May 6 edition of Newsweek, pgs. 24-25.  We may assume the room was full of newsmen, popping, snapping, flashing, buzzing, and calling instructions for poses.

What is the most likely effect of this?  The effect could only be the demoralization of Catholics worldwide.  "As Christianity spirals downward into strife and theological confusion, it becomes a vacuum unable to defend itself . . . "

The paedophilia circus will help bring about the disappearance of Christianity; disappointed Christians will  turn to the Jews, become Hasidic Gentiles, and solidify the Jewish Empire.  Just as the Lubavitchers said.   


Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. All economic and technological aid to the Communist Bloc, including the PLO, will be terminated immediately. Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.

Jewish courts (the batei dini of the rabbis) will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha [Jewish law] . . .  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.
mirrored at:

Look at this sentence from the above quote:

Jewish courts (the batei dini of the rabbis) will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts.

This is no less than a plan for insurrection.  The Jewish fifth column is in place; when the rabbis give the word, it will jump out and overturn whatever is left of our system of justice, based as it was on the principles of Anglo-Saxon law.

And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.

This is the police state, with Hasidic Gentiles used as front men, Lubavitchers as commissars.


Should any officials of Chabad Lubavitch be questioned about statements from the "Jews and Hasidic Gentiles--United to Save America (JHG-USA)," these officials may deny that JHG-USA is officially connected to them.  Similarly, the White House, Ari Fleischer, Joseph Lieberman, etc., will also perhaps distance themselves.  But they cannot distance themselves from the Rambam, or from the Talmud.  No, what you have read here represents the age-old beliefs and ambitions of Judaism. 


WASHINGTON, (March 11 (JTA) [Jewish Telegraphic Agency]  --  Lubavitch rabbis from across the United States and 40 countries launched their 100th birthday commemoration of the spiritual leader,  Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, by marking the six-month anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

A photo of the ubiquitous Rabbi Levi Shemtov appears in the article.  The caption tells us that the memorial service/birthday celebration was held outside the Pentagon.

Why are the Lubavitchers combining the celebration of a great and holy man with the service of mourning for the deaths of 125 Americans?  What could these two events possibly have in common?   An American Friends of Lubavitch publication, "15 Minutes," reported that 500 Lubavitch emissaries were at the Pentagon that day.   Five hundred. 

Five hundred is not the fringe.  Five hundred is the carpet.  Once again: Why was 9-11 so significant an event for the Lubavitchers?
mirrored at:

Now back to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency:

Standing Monday in the cold wind and bright sunshine across from the crash site at the Pentagon, the rabbis sang 'Oseh Shalom' and 'God bless America' at 9:38 AM, the time that the hijacked passenger plane hit the center of the American defence establishment . . . .

If you search google on "Oseh Shalom" and "lyrics," you will discover a number of translations similar to this one: "May he who makes peace in high places, make peace for us and for all Israel, and let us say, amen."

Officially, the 9-11 terrorism had nothing to do with Israel, nothing at all.  Factually, however, the dream of the Reeb and his followers for Jewish world domination had everything in common with Bush's war on Islam.  By this war, the Jews hope the US will annihilate Islam, the most vigorous religious rival to Judaism.
And how does "peace for Israel" relate to 9-11? Think back to the massive slaughter of Palestinians Israel has been able to effect since 9-11. There is no sweeter peace to be found than at the graveyard of one's enemy . . .

Dov Zakheim, the US undersecretary of defence and reportedly the leading candidate to become the next president of New York's Yeshiva University, quoted from the Torah and said that to 'tie the freedom of the country to the memory of the rebbe is a marvellous thing.'

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency "Lubavitch Recall Sept. 11 Attack")
mirrored at:

Zakheim mocks everything America has stood for by mentioning "the freedom of the country" at the Schneerson birthday party/wake.  Schneerson did everything in his power to destroy Bill of Rights traditions in our country, and Zakheim violates his oath of office by endorsing Schneerson.  According to "15 Minutes:"

Calling America 'the greatest country in the world,' Zakheim delivered a dvar Torah (sermon), expounding on the halachic (Jewish law) requirements of a poor man bringing a meal offering in the Temple,
mirrored at:

This is a concatenation of the bizarre.  Dov Zakheim is the Comptroller of the Department of Defence.  If you do a google search on him, you will learn that he is also an ordained Orthodox rabbi, and was a contender for the presidency of Yeshiva University.  And here he is, lecturing on Jewish law --- on a trivial topic -- at a birthday kick-off for the Reeb-come wake for the Pentagon victims . . . 

Your search on Zakheim will reveal that he publicly deplored Jonathan Pollard's treason and incurred Israeli ire when he opposed the US production of Israel's Lavi jet fighter planes.  Zakheim  said the production of these planes for Israel would cost the US taxpayer billions of dollars.

Rabbi Zakheim sounds like the guardian of the public purse and quite a patriot, doesn't he?  
On the other hand, Zakheim lauds Schneerson, and says that to "tie the freedom of the country to the memory of the rebbe is a marvellous thing."  Rabbi Zakheim is familiar with the Reeb's work.  He knows about the Naughahyde laws.  He knows about Schneeron's life-long dedication to destroy the Bill of Rights, to create a Talmudist theocracy where Christians and others can be put to death for following a non-Naugahyde religion . . . 

I suspect Rabbi Zakheim is not a guardian of the public purse.  I suspect Rabbi Zakheim is not a patriot at all -- at least not an American patriot.  DoD Comptroller Zakheim stands with his hand in the Pentagon's till.  What a wonderful ruse.  Perhaps Rabbi Zakheim poses as a "good Jew" publicly, but behind our backs he is robbing us blind and siphoning US tax dollars to the Lubavitchers and Israel.  Given his endorsement of Schneerson, given Schneerson's exhortation for Jewish world domination, why wouldn't Rabbi Zakheim do exactly that?  You think he'd be worried about Donald Rumsfeld looking over his shoulder? Funny name, that one.  Rumsfeld.  RumsFELD . . .  You don't suppose?  Naw . . . .

Now here's what Rabbi Levi Shemtov while at the October 11 Birthday kick-off-Pentagon wake:

"It was not the rebbe's[Schneerson's] goal to be Maschiach," the messiah, "but it was his goal to bring Maschiach by making the world a better place."
mirrored at:

From Shemtov's lips, we learn Schneerson did not use "Mashiach" to mean a person, but the Jewish people.  And we have already seen Schneerson's goal was bring the rule of the Jewish people over everybody on Planet Earth...  That certainly would make the world a better place -- for the Jews.  And the Jews are the only people who really matter.   Gentiles are a different species . . .  

By their own actions and words, the Lubavitchers tell us that 9-11 would have been Schneerson's dream: Their actions and words lead us to an almost inevitable conclusion: 9-11 was a Lubavitch event.  That's why they "launched" the celebration of Schneerson's birthday outside the Pentagon ruins.

By their own actions and works, the Lubavitchers tell us they are the vanguard of expansion and consolidation of the international Jewish Empire.  Their enforcement arm is the office of the Presidency of the United States, the US military, and Congress.   


Now let's briefly visit the sixteenth century.  In what we now call Mexico, there lived a civilization of fierce warriors, the Aztecs.  Aztec legends said that one of their gods, Quetzalcoatl, who was tall, light skinned, and had a beard, had been put out to sea by a rival.  Aztec prophecies predicted Quetzalcoatl's return. 

Cortez was tall, light-skinned, and had a beard.  When he sailed up the Aztec coast and came ashore, the Aztecs thought he was Quetzalcoatl.  So instead of fighting their new conquerors, the Aztecs became slaves to their returning "god." Cortez's small band of Spanish soldiers conquered Montezuma's thousands easily.  ("The Conquest of New Spain," Bernal Diaz, 1963 translation published by Penguin Classics.)

Moving forward to our times: Jews can read the Book of Revelations as easily as Christians.  How simple it is for the Jews to create and enact scenarios which parallel Biblical prophecies.  Christians become convinced that "End Times" are around the corner and welcome the Jews as the harbingers of Christ's return.  So instead of resisting their Jewish conquerors, many Christians welcome them and eagerly become their serfs.

Our Jewish conquerors are well-versed in Christian myths about the End Times -- they have read the New Testament, they take minister's courses, they even write books and tell Christians how to interpret the symbols in Revelations.  Is it any wonder that so many Christians think the salvation of Heaven requires the Jews to be well set up with all the wealth imaginable, including whatever they want in the Middle East?  Is it any wonder that many Christians think that a slaughter of the Moslems is what God wants?

Even if others are sucked in by this manipulation, there is no need for the rest of us to follow.


As the Lubavitchers point out, "Judaism has always been a conquering religion . . . "
mirrored at:

We know Jews will not live side by side with their non-Jewish neighbours and share the good life.  Jews must control and dominate.

Again, as the Lubavitchers have pointed out, Jews cannot achieve world domination without help from Gentiles.  They must induce Christians and non-Christian Gentiles to act like the Aztecs did before Cortez -- Jews must create a willing untermensch.  They must create Naugahydes.

Now comes hope.  History has shown time and time again that the Jewish Supremacists overplay their hand.  That is why, historically, the Jews have been expelled from one country after another.

I suspect they are overplaying their hand again.  I suspect that if enough Americans, both Christians and non-Christian, discover the true plans of the Jews, the conquest may be thwarted.  I believe it is possible to stop these tyrants.

I recommend that all non-Jews buy a copy of the Soncino translation of the Talmud's Tractate Sanhedrin (Tractates are subdivisions within the Talmud).  I suggest the Soncino translation because it is accepted and unchallenged by Jewry, having been translated into English by Hebrew-speaking rabbis.  The Sanhedrin will cost you $29.95.   You can order it at:

You can also order through and other bookstores.

Verify what I have quoted in this article and read the hundreds of other astounding statements.  (For example, look at the conditions under which grown men may have sexual intercourse with three-year old girls (Sanhedrin 55b, 69a.)  Pressure your minister to buy the Sanhedrin and become familiar with its contents.  Ask him to buy the full set of the Talmud volumes for your Church library ($850 for a 30-volume set).

Every non-Jew and every Christian needs to know what the Talmud contains.  There has been quite a bit of discussion about the Qur'an since 9-11.  Now it's time to discuss the Talmud. 


We have already seen examples of premeditated and deceitful programs have been carefully executed over decades.  Recall that Schneerson's birthday has been observed by the government of the United States since 1978, artfully disguised as Education and Sharing Day.  But let's put another face on all this.

We have already seen that Lubavitch missionary Ari Fleischer was a leader in the organization of the Chabad Lubavitch Forum on Capitol Hill, and that Fleischer "lavished praise on the active Chabad effort that emphasized the army of young staffers in government and political jobs."

We have seen that Ari Fleischer praised the Capitol Hill rabbi, Levi Shemtov, thus:  "In political Washington, it's very easy to get caught up in your job.  Your focus can wander from your religion.  He [Shemtov] made it easy for me to find even more of a Jewish life on the Hill."

Now see  what Fleischer told the Jewish Times (Baltimore, Md.) on January 5, 2001:

'I believe deeply in my religion and I believe in the principles of my party.  I don't commingle the two.'
mirrored at:

But Ari Fleischer, by his deed and words, has made it clear that his religion and his party are one and the same.  His on-the-job- purpose is to destroy what remains of our First Amendment and whatever remains of traditional American culture, and replace it with theocracy run by Pharisees.  Truth means nothing to folks such as Fleischer. 

Review what you have read here: According to both classical Judaism and contemporary Chabad Lubavitch,  Christians should be put to death (beheaded) for the practice of their religion.  Obedient Naughaydes will be deprived of education in math, science, history, English, social studies, computers and other technical studies and be fashioned into a permanent underclass.

Yet see what Ari Fleischer told the Jewish Times on January 5, 2001:

'The Jewish religion teaches people to be responsible, to be open-minded and to care about others . . . '

If you have your $29.95 copy of the Tractate Sanhedrin, you will be impervious to lies such as these.  You will be able to read for yourself what the Jewish religion really teaches.


You may be called "anti-Semitic" for discussing the Talmud and other Jewish religious works. Should this happen, ask this question: "Is it anti-Christian to read and discuss the Gospels?"

Point out to your accusers that Jewish doctrines demand "idol-worshippers" (Christians) be put to death, and that set of 30 Naughahyde laws specify they be put to death by decapitation. Then ask them:

What is anti-Semitic about reading classical Jewish religious literature and protesting plans for my own decapitation?

Follow that up with this question:

What is American about forbidding this discussion?

Key Lubavitch doctrines have been captured and are available through the mirrors I have provided in this article, and supplemental documentation on Lubavitcher goals is plentiful on the Internet.  I propose that we make mirrors of those websites; please feel free to mirror this article.





Each of us live under different circumstances. But each of us know people of good will, friends and neighbours or casual acquaintances, people who want to live in Liberty, and who want to live at peace with one another.

Most of these people have access to computers. These are the people we must reach. Good, honest, decent people ARE being awaken from their sleep.

The first step in any program for constructive reform is awareness. We must awaken good, honest, and decent people by reaching them. Our future depends on getting the word out.


Copy and pass this vital information on to other people with whom you are acquainted.  If we are indeed the last generation and all the indications seem to be there, this could be the most important message anyone will ever read, as it may make the difference in where they will spend ALL of eternity.



You are what you know

 and you will be held accountable what you DO

 with what you know


The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II


"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws


Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2