Noahide News

 

Part 165

April 13,  2005 

Day 144 of 1290 of 2300

 

 The FINISH 

of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.

mason seal

 

Extra Extra

 

http://www.gsnonweb.com/

Turkish president visits Syria amid U.S. unease

DAMASCUS, April 13 (Reuters) - Turkish President Ahmet Necdet Sezer landed in Syria on Wednesday on a state visit which has stirred unease in the United States and drawn criticism from some political analysts who say it sends the wrong signal.

Syria, branded by Washington as a sponsor of international terrorism, is under heavy international pressure to pull all its troops and security forces from neighbouring Lebanon. It has pledged to do so by the end of this month.

Sezer has been careful in the run-up to the visit to stress the importance of Turkey-U.S. ties -- already strained by the Iraq war and its aftermath -- and Turkish media said the president would deliver a strong message to his Syrian hosts.

"Diplomatic sources say (the president) is expected to relay a message to (Syrian President Bashar al-Assad) that he must pull his troops from Lebanon as soon as possible," the top-selling Hurriyet daily said.

Assad has publicly hailed Sezer's decision to go ahead with his trip as evidence that NATO member Turkey is ready to stand up to the United States on issues of national interest.

Syrian Prime Minister Naji al-Otari said Sezer's "insistence on this visit" embodied Turkish support for "just causes".

Turkish nationalists insist Turkey must not be seen to bow to U.S. pressure over Syria, but some Middle East experts have criticised Sezer's decision to visit Damascus.

"(Sezer's trip) seems nothing but sailing in the open seas without a compass," wrote Cengiz Candar in the conservative daily Dunden Bugune Tercuman, arguing Turkey lacks a coherent strategy for dealing with the Middle East.

UNIQUE POSITION

Uniquely in the region, Turkey has strong security ties with Israel, Syria's mortal enemy, but under the Islamist-rooted government of Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan has tried to build better ties with Arab countries and with Iran.

Turkey, Syria and Iran share the same concerns about the turmoil in Iraq and fear it could lead eventually to the creation of a Kurdish state in the north of the country.

Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Turkey....WEretz ISREALHELL....Babylon Proper 

This, they say, would fan separatism among their own Kurdish populations, leading to regional instability.

Syria agreed to end its 29-year troop presence in Lebanon last month after many Lebanese blamed it for the February assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri. Damascus denies any responsibility for his death.

Turkey, which has seen a big thaw in ties with Syria after years of tension, stayed relatively quiet as the United States and the European Union piled pressure on Damascus to withdraw.

The U.S. ambassador in Ankara, Eric Edelman, then publicly urged Turkey to join the "international consensus" on Syria, in comments interpreted by the Turkish media as a call to Sezer to cancel or postpone his visit to Damascus.

Sezer's trip reciprocates a state visit to Ankara by Assad last year. Sezer returns to Turkey on Thursday evening

____

http://www.gsnonweb.com/

ATHENS, April 13 (Reuters) - A Greek court will rule on Wednesday whether to allow sales of a cartoon book from Austria depicting Jesus Christ as a drinking buddy of Jimi Hendrix and a marijuana-smoking, naked surfer.

Cartoonist Gerhard Haderer was found guilty by a Greek court of "malicious public blasphemy" this year and received a six-month suspended prison sentence for his take on the life of Christ -- but he can only be detained if he comes to Greece.

The book went on sale in Greece briefly in 2002, but the Orthodox Church was outraged and succeeded in having it immediately withdrawn through a provisional court order.

"This should never have happened if we were living in a real democratic society," said Athina Kouri of the book's Greek publishers Oxy. "Our position is that there should be no obstacle to the freedom of speech."

Haderer's lawyer Maria Mazioti is expected to file an objection to the ruling on Wednesday on the grounds that another European Union member, Austria, refused to charge the cartoonist after complaints in his home country regarding the same book.

"The Life of Jesus" has been translated into 10 languages.

Dozens of top Greek cartoonists are backing their colleague, saying the decision has harmed the image of their country.

A 1,000-signature petition, signed by international artists, including 2004 Nobel Literature Prize winner Elfriede Jelinek, demanded the immediate lifting of the ban.

It was not clear whether Haderer, who has said he would take the case to the European Court of Human Rights, would be present at the trial.

____

Give us a king to Judge us, Give us the Robber, Crucify Jesus....ALL the people cried out.

These Hard hearted people denied the Messiah, for he refused to murder the enemies of Jewry, by the power of the murderer since the beginning. their father, and the lust of their father the murderer they do, and have since Righteous Abel.

 All the Prophecies concerning the Messiah, the prophets of Baa'l, the Sanhedrin,  who delivered Jesus to be Crucified according to their laws they made unto themselves of Talmud Bavli of Babylon, which makes the Word of God of None effect unto them, are replicating every prophecy, which concerned Jesus the Christ, to bring their own "REVEALED" mere man king, to deceive all the masses that have been Judaizd by the leaven of the Pharisees, their Moshiach, which will destroy the Goyim and their arch enemy the saints of Jesus the Christ, in their hashem wars of their Hoodlum haha shemborg collective.

Already, they are brainwashing Judeo-Churchinsanity, to accept that the sanhedrin of the Dragon, satan will cry out to accept the one they pierced, thus Evangelical Churchinsanity accept the Sanhedrin who has bemused and snared them with their fables.

Because they believed not the TRUTH, that Jesus the Christ, the Everlasting Father, Almighty GOD the IAMHE, is God come in the flesh, and they have watered him down into a mere creature, instead of the creator, God has sent them strong delusion so they believe the Lie.

Already they rumor they may have missed the Talmudic created Scofield "Secret Rapture" that did not require that they STAND FIRM, but flee, and when they realize that the Son of perdition is "REVEALED" for they denied the truth, it is too late, for by strong delusion sent by the Father, they will cling to the beast of the Dragon.

If you have been deceived, and snared to this great whore, and you seek and yearn with your heart and soul, Cry out now to the LORD Almighty for Salvation by faith and become heirs to His Promise. I cannot save you, nor any man, only the shepherd. Beware time is Nigh and the Completion is at hand.

 

Dan:11:14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.

http://www.vbm-torah.org/archive/kings05.htm

SHIUR #5: Appointing A King

by Rav Mosheh Lichtenstein 

 

Having analyzed in previous shiurim some of the different aspects inherent in monarchy, the time has come to direct our attention to individual components of the halakhic (Law) system of government.

 Which of the various possibilities for selecting a king does the Torah (Talmud Bavli, Mishnah Torah)  endorse? Actually, the formulation of the Torah itself is ambiguous.

downright confusion of the dragon

On the one hand, the narrative states that the people will set a king upon themselves (Devarim 17:14 - "Ve-amarta asima alai melekh"). On the other hand, the king is described by the Torah, in the very next verse, as being chosen by God.

They cried out for a King and denied the KING of KINGS over them, do not be deceived, see prophet Samuel, who was NOT of the Sanhedrin of Abomination 

The Ramban, who points out the discrepancy between the two verses, quotes the opinion of "the commentators" (da'at ha-mefarshim) who explain that the choice of the king is in God's hands, made known to us by means of the urim ve-tumim or the prophet. 

Jesus the Christ IS, was, and forever the KING of KINGS, who they continue to deny. Their house shall be left desolate until they say, "Blessed is he who comes in the NAME of the LORD

The first verse, which describes the people as choosing their king should be understood to mean that they shall coronate the person chosen by God. 

of course as dictated by the self made Elohim who sit upon the seat of Moses, the Sofiet Talmudic RED Esau Vipers of Sanhedrin of abomination who have made their laws unto themselves and deny the Commandments of God the Father.

They will do this very soon, by referendum....and ALL the people cried out........

 

The Ramban himself, however, believes that it is the people who appoint the monarch, offering various other suggestions to understand the phrase that the king will be God's choice.

for they say in their laws that they are gods 

A third approach is adopted by the Rambam who combines the two elements, ruling that both the Sanhedrin (High Court) and a navi (prophet) (freemason apostate Solomon Molech, Catholicos)  are required. Actually, the Rambam is fusing together two Tannaitic sources. The Tosefta (Sanhedrin 3:4) states that the Sanhedrin is required to appoint a king, while the Sifri explains that the prophet determines God's choice. 

either way they have the world deceived in their vision against the King of Kings the Everlasting Holy Covenant, and now all the world accept them whose names are written in the Lambs Book of life since the foundation of the world who stand Fim in their testimony and their witness of his, will too refuse and be a-shamed by the shem sham, ...a-shemed of the Lord Jesus the Christ 

 

Rather than assuming that the two sources disagree, along the lines of the Ramban (Mammon-eyes)  and "the commentators,  (them who have produced the perversion of Gods Word)   " the Rambam posits a system which accepts both elements as necessary to appoint a monarch. 

of course by disagreement and confusion

What is the relationship between the functions? Obviously, if the navi (Nasi, High Priest of Baa'l Nimrod worship of the "Golden Calf)  selects a person as being worthy of the position, the Sanhedrin would not be able to contradict his choice, 

Thus they must have their Elijah prophet, which is ironically shembolically looking as though he may be Giovanni Battista RE, John Baptist RE, the carpenters son, the beast out of the earth with two horns as a lamb......to be revealed by the Catholicos of Sanhedrin, Pontifex Maximas of Sime-On Magus of perversion soon....a brand new "HOLY Father" just yet another snake charmer and Noahide deceiver

for they cannot dare claim that their knowledge or information is better than his. "For man can see the eyes, but God sees into the heart." Therefore, we must understand the Rambam as requiring human participation in order to establish an additional source of authority.

referendum.....ALL the People must Cry out.....Give us a king to be over us. And thus the fall of Arik Sheinerman the king of the south, Judah, Aholibah the whore sister to Dan, Samaria, Aholah, the hasidic Sofiet talmudic Communitarian RED Esau of the North who controls Washington DC and Heil Bushkevik.......the two now sit at one table deceiving one another, each hoping to retain the whore daughter Jerusalem.

Bush is playing his card lead by the Chabad Lubavitch, knowing the hasidic plan of the revived beast sanhedrin, knowing the Sharon disengagement will fall.

Immediately when Bush sees Arik Sheinerman's shake up in secular zion, he will move rapidly to gain control of that whore city Jerusalem that spiritual Sodom and Egypt where Our Lord was crucified.

But Bush will fall, and the Sanhedrin of the sons of the shemaGoG will anoint their false Christ, Moshiach ben satan the deceiver of all the earth, who will do the work of the Dragon by the Dragon's power and scatter the saints of his Only enemy, Jesus the Christ who will destroy him in his Glorius Coming, by the Power of the WORD of GOD the two edged sword out of his MOUTH without hand. 

 Though the prophet is the ultimate search committee, whose ruling is final, the Sanhedrin must be involved as representing the people. Their acceptance and appointment of the king establishes the monarch as deriving his authority from the people's election. The Sanhedrin do not function here in their judicial but rather in their representative capacity. By involving the Sanhedrin in addition to the prophet, the Rambam roots the monarchical powers in the will and acceptance of the nation.

The same Sanhedrin in their envy of the ONLY Begotten Son of God, who said look it is the heir, let us rob him and slay him and take his kingdom, did err, for his Kingdom he inherited since the foundation of the world, and that KINGDOM was and is and never will be a kingdom of the corrupted flesh, But the KINGDOM of his Father, Sion, God's Holy Mountain in Heaven, his Bride a NEW Jerusalem not tainted by bloody whoredom, and we his saints sent since the beginning to Testify of him the ONLY IAM who are faithful and TRUE are made as Priest and Kings unto God and his Father forever and we are the invited Guest of his wedding to His beautiful Bride wearing the white of his saints, New Jerusalem into a company of inumerable angels........Praise the Highest

 

The same point is explicit in a gemara in Berakhot (55a), though in somewhat of an aggadic context.

 

    "R. Isaac said: We must not appoint a leader over a community without first consulting it, as it says: 'See, the Lord has called by name Bezalel, the son of Uri.' The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses: Do you consider Bezalel suitable? He replied: Sovereign of the Universe, if you think him suitable, surely I must also! Said [God] to him: All the same, go and consult them. He went and asked Israel: Do you consider Bezalel suitable? They replied: If the Holy One, blessed be He, and you consider him suitable, surely we must!"

    Do you consider Jesus the Christ the Everlasting FATHER Almighty God suitable, the Father ask?

    and the people all cried NO, for we have heard that god is with the jews, and the god of the jews is our God, so crucify Jesus.......

    Not knowing the jews in their perversion of Talmud Bavli they deceive the masses by saying Torah, which is Mishnah Torah of the Babylonian Talmud the Tradition which makes the WORD of GOD of none effect, and it states in its Blasphemy and sorcery and sick perversion that their g-d has no ONLY Begotten SON and in fact that Jesus the Christ was a bastard and the son of a whore and a Roman Soldier.....yes they hold the skirts of the Jews and ten folow after each "Chosen" who chose the "Robber" and crucified the "Chooser" and cry let us follow you for we have heard that god is with you..................But not until the Day they say, "Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the LORD Jesus the Christ....jesus the Nazarene

     

Even though the Almighty has chosen Betzalel, He requests that the people also participate in the selection. 

For the rib-eyes argue with  their g-d and usually win.....Talmud Bavli

Moshe's reaction is that since God Himself has made the decision, what need is there for any additional input? After all, the proper choice has certainly been made. The Almighty, though, responds that the participation of the people is necessary, not in order to select the best candidate, but in order to provide him with the necessary mandate for his authority.

remember Bush's mandate of the Majority to slay wonderfully? Where do you suppose he received his mandate? Yes from an apostate people.

 

[The idea of the Sanhedrin functioning as the representative body of Am Yisrael, at least in the Rambam's doctrine, is well established and has been advanced by various Acharonim, basing themselves upon the Rambam's formulations in Hilkhot Terumot 1:2 and Hilkhot Melakhim 5:2. See Rav Soloveitchik's article on kiddush ha-chodesh in Kovetz Chidushei Torah and Rav Goren's discussion in the opening essay of his sefer Meishiv Milchama, amongst others. See also Prof. Blidstein's book, "Ekronot Medini'im," p. 58. Actually, as pointed out by Prof. Blidstein, the Rambam himself already formulated this very idea in his Peirush Ha-mishnayot on Horayot (1:6). There, the Rambam states explicitly that the Sanhedrin is "Kahal Yisrael bi-khlaliyuto" (The Congregation of Israel in its entirety).]

 Bye-Bye Sharon

Having concluded that the Rambam requires a mandate from the people and therefore rules that the Sanhedrin must be involved in the selection, we must now look into the role of the prophet. 

ram-bam thank you mam, mrs. Amaraka

Is he serving only as a search committee, better equipped than mere mortals to identify the proper candidate, but not invested with any special authority, or does he also serve as the representative of Divine authority?

"HOLY Father" the Catholicos of Sanhedrin the gods........elohim...who are no gods, but devil possessed men who deny the Father in heaven

 In other words, is the source of monarchical power rooted only in a human source of authority or is a Heavenly source required as well? The implications of this for our current situation are obvious. If the only necessary source of authority is the decision of the people, then it is available nowadays, no less than in yesteryear, and open to democratic as well as monarchical heads of government. If, however, Divine authority is also required, then we can only grant legitimacy by means of a prophet or the urim ve-tumim. (Other possible sources of authority for democratic functions will be discussed in future installments, b"n.

 

The halakhic expression of this query is the issue whether a navi is required only le-khatchila or also be-di'eved. If we support the former position that the navi is no more than a search committee, then his involvement is not crucial. If he can assist in the selection process - thank God; if not, then Beth Din (the court) will apply their own judgment.

Note: revelation of Jesus the Christ, 13:

The beast out of the seas = Sanhedrin REVIVED OCT 13, 2004

the beast with a head wound, Moshiach ben satan

THEN.................the beast out of the earth as a lamb with two horns

will Moshiach ben satan be REVEALED before the Conclave elects RE?

Or will they elect John Baptist RE the king, the carpenters son, just before the Sanhedrin anoints their mere man false king? then give blessing to the Monarchy?

Either way, it is April 13, 2005  and the Conclave of secrecy will begin in just a few days for their "HOLY Father" of the Universal Ecumenical Noahide Laws of the Religion unto the Dragon.

 

 However, the latter position maintains that God must grant His authority, and therefore the navi is indispensable. 

The Keren Ora, in his commentary on Horayot (11b) seems to suggest that this issue is a machloket (dispute) between the Talmud Bavli and the Yerushalmi. 

Babylonian Talmud and Talmud Jerusalem.

The Babylonian Talmud has authority over the Jerusalem Talmud

The Bavli is of the opinion that any leader accepted by the people is considered a king, while the Yerushalmi, which states that all Israelite kings after Yehu were thieves (since they were not appointed by a prophet), 

so they must make a prophet of Baa'l to appease the school of Jerusalem Talmud

insists upon the authority of the navi alone to grant the mantle of monarchy. He also quotes a Tosafot (Sanhedrin 20b) that requires election by God in order to exercise royal authority, since Divine authority alone can grant one man power over his fellow man.

and who has this Authority........"Holy Father" of Holy SEE of Vatican two Bull

 In contrast to this Tosafot, the Rambam in his commentary on the Mishna (Keritut 1:1) raises various scenarios regarding the accession of a prospective king, including popular acclaim, use of force, appointment by a navi, the Sanhedrin or Kohen Gadol, all of which are recognized as granting him royal authority.

and all the kings of the earth drink of the cup of iniquity of the great whore

 Two other well-known sources who address this issue are the Radvaz (Melakhim 3:8), who opines that a king may be chosen either by a prophet or by the people, and Rav Kook, who ponders this issue in a teshuva (Mishpat Kohen 144:15) and tends to accept the first option, that a navi is dispensable, thus paving his way for legitimizing the Hasmonean kingdom.

see Jor-DAN 

Thus, the question of the necessity of Divine involvement in the appointment of a king is the subject of a (possible) machloket between the Bavli and the Yerushalmi and between Rambam and Tosafot, and is also the subject of further discussion in Acharonim.

 King of Confusion

Having presented the above mentioned opinions, we cannot yet conclude this segment without connecting them to the issues and concepts dealt with in previous shiurim. Throughout all of the above discussion, we did not disbetween different functions of royalty. However, as we explained in previous shiurim, it is obvious that not all halakhot relating to a melekh can be lumped together without analyzing their essential nature. Therefore, we must now proceed to review our conclusions in light of this. As a starting point, we may take a remark of Rav Kook's in the closing lines of the responsum cited above. Having been questioned as to the right of the Hasmoneans to wage war (a royal prerogative) and concluding that they were legitimate rulers since appointment by a navi is dispensable, he adds the following:

 

    "Aside from this, it seems reasonable that at a time when there is no king, these privileges revert to the hands of the nation as a whole, since the prerogatives of monarchy also pertain to the general condition of the nation. In particular, it seems that every Judge who arises in Israel has the status of a king, as regards several royal prerogatives, particularly those pertaining to governance of the nation." (Mishpat Kohen, 144)

     

The truth of his remarks rings loud and clear. As long as we are concerned with the public weal - what we defined as issues of malkhut (government) rather than personal status - it is eminently logical that the people have the ability to grant the authority and prerequisites of power to a ruler (or, in the absence of a monarchy, to any governing administration set up by the people). To the extent that a navi is needed, it is only for matters pertaining to the king's personal status. Conversely, if we accept the claim that the Davidic kingdom confers a personal sacral status, that clearly can be authorized by Divine authorization alone.

Thus REFERENDUM....set up by the Chabad Hasidim Pharisees of Sanhedrin...see Sanhedrin Ruling on the "Road Map to Hell" that George knows for a fact will not stand. For Bush knows that Sharon, appeasing the Hasidim, will be cast out, then he thinks it is he who shall be given Jerusalem....hahahhahha but he too is to be double crossed by the Sanhedrin Chabad Lubavitchers, and they will place their Moshiach of the Abomination which makes desolate........

 

Thus, the sources cited above must be analyzed as to which element of monarchy they are dealing with. Since both the Bavli and Yerushalmi are discussing the issue of korban nasi (leader's sacrifice), they are obviously disagreeing; however, it is not necessarily a machloket (Law) regarding the legitimacy of the governing authority, but rather a narrower question of whether the korban is a function of personal status or abuse of power. The Radvaz makes his comment regarding the halakha of mored be-malkhut; Tosafot discuss mishpat ha-melekh (royal privileges); the Rambam deals with the halakha of anointing a king after a disputed succession; and Rav Kook is confronted by the issue of declaring war. Regarding each, a separate analysis must be made. At the moment, we will not undertake this task; however, we must point out that the issue at stake may be the understanding of each particular function and its relationship to the varying royal elements, rather than a sweeping machloket as to the need for a navi to legitimize royal power and person.

 

In conclusion, it is worthwhile to point out that the Ramban also claims, basing himself on the phrase, "Ve-amarta asima alai melekh," that the people's request of a king is itself part of the mitzva, a requirement which would indicate that the source of authority is rooted in the people, who must express their willingness to establish a human king over themselves.

 

 

http://www.vbm-torah.org/archive/kings05.htm

A third approach is adopted by the Rambam who combines the two elements, ruling that both the Sanhedrin (High Court) and a navi (prophet) are required. 

Actually, the Rambam is fusing together two Tannaitic sources. The Tosefta (Sanhedrin 3:4) states that the Sanhedrin is required to appoint a king, while the Sifri explains that the prophet determines God's choice. Rather than assuming that the two sources disagree, along the lines of the Ramban and "the commentators," the Rambam posits a system which accepts both elements as necessary to appoint a monarch. What is the relationship between the functions? Obviously, if the navi (false prophet) selects a person as being worthy of the position, the Sanhedrin would not be able to contradict his choice, for they cannot dare claim that their knowledge or information is better than his.

thus the Catholicos will be a token figurehead, to deceive the masses so they will make an image OF THE BEAST

 

 "For man can see the eyes, but God sees into the heart." Therefore, we must understand the Rambam as requiring human participation in order to establish an additional source of authority. Though the prophet is the ultimate search committee, whose ruling is final, the Sanhedrin must be involved as representing the people.

having absolute RULE

 

 Their acceptance and appointment of the king establishes the monarch as deriving his authority from the people's election.

Noahide Demonicrazy

 The Sanhedrin do not function here in their judicial but rather in their representative capacity. By involving the Sanhedrin in addition to the prophet, the Rambam roots the monarchical powers in the will and acceptance of the nation.

The same point is explicit in a gemara in Berakhot (55a), though in somewhat of an aggadic context.

 

    "R. Isaac said: We must not appoint a leader over a community without first consulting it, (REFERENDUM of Majority) 

ussed in future installments, b"n.

 

_______

Saul worked for the SANHEDRIN when the stoning of Jesus the Christ believers was taking place. Stephen was stoned while Saul of Sanhedrin held his clothing. The religion of the jews is contrary unto all mankind. Come out of the Whore......

_______

thanks Rowen Berkely

AROUND THE JEWISH WORLD
Festering rivalry in Prague bursts into open with violence on Shabbat
By Dinah Spritzer
http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?strwebhead=Violence+mars+Prague+Shabbat+service

PRAGUE, April 12 (JTA) — A long-simmering dispute in the Prague Jewish
community over the leadership of one of the city’s most prestigious
synagogues has resulted in a violent altercation and the shul’s temporary
closure. The rabbi of the famed Old-New Synagogue, Manis Barash, was
conducting Shabbat services Saturday and was displeased to find that Karol
Sidon, chief rabbi for the Czech Federation of Jewish Communities, was
offered an aliyah to the Torah by the synagogues’s gabbai, according to
observers. Barash, an American-born Chabad member, made his displeasure
known, pointing out that he, not Sidon — who was fired as chief rabbi of
Prague last summer — was the only person who should be conducting a Torah

Matthew 23:

1: Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,
2: Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
3: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
4: For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
5: But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
6:
And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
7: And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.

8: But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
9: And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
10: Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
11: But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.


reading, gabbai Jakub Svab said. Soon the incident erupted into violence,
leaving several people injured and at least one considering criminal
charges.

The background to the incident was laid last summer. The Prague community
erupted in a furor when then-chairman Tomas Jelinek fired Sidon, claiming
the rabbi was not performing his duties properly and had misplaced
ceremonial objects. But Jelinek admitted that the larger problem was an
interpersonal conflict over the direction of the community. Sidon is an
Orthodox convert, while Jelinek is secular. Jelinek wanted to open the
community to more foreign and liberal elements, and claims Sidon was too
closed to such ideas. Sidon, for his part, claimed Jelinek wanted unfettered
power. When Jelinek dismissed Sidon he installed Barash, who is not fluent
in Czech, as the synagogue’s chief rabbi. The move was highly controversial,
since Sidon’s congregation had been worshiping at the shul with him since at
least the mid 1990s, and Chabad wasn’t part of the official Czech Jewish
Community. Sidon moved his congregation to the more contemporary High
Synagogue.

On Saturday, however, the 30 or so worshippers who usually attended the High
Synagogue turned up at the Old-New Synagogue with Sidon in tow. It seemed
like an attempt to “take the synagogue back in some way. It was like the
army had marched in,” said Rafael Ohana, an Israeli tour guide who has lived
in Prague for five years and regularly attends Barash’s services. The
dispute turned heated when Barash refused to allow Sidon to have an aliyah.
Sidon told the congregation that they should move to the High Synagogue.
Most of the worshippers left, witnesses say. Shortly after, violence broke
out in the Old-New Synagogue’s entrance hall. A press release issued by the
Prague Jewish Community, many of whose members opposed Sidon’s firing last
summer, reported that six Barash supporters beat up two young worshippers.
The alleged victims “ended up seriously wounded, one of them tugged by his
legs on the floor after being beaten in the head, which resulted in a
concussion,” according to the release.

But Ohana had a different version of events. Barash’s wife “wanted to come
inside the synagogue. There was a Czech woman, a Sidon supporter, who told
the guards, ‘Don’t let this lady in, she does not belong here,’ ” Ohana
said. Upon hearing that, Ohana said, a Czech-Israeli woman, Tfila Yerucham,
the 19-year-old sister of the synagogue’s cantor, responded, “Anyone is
welcome here. What you are saying now is what the Nazis told my
 grandmother.” The Czech woman then told her boyfriend that Yerucham had
called her a Nazi, Ohana continued. The boyfriend then “hit Tfila in the
face a few times and she fell to the floor,” Ohana said. “He beat and kicked her.”

Ohana’s version of events was reinforced by Yerucham’s father, who says the
fight was laced with political undertones about control of the synagogue.
Several Chabad House regulars entered the fight. “Everybody was fighting
everybody. There might have been 20 people going at each other,” said Ohana,
who said most of the fighters on the Chabad side were Israelis, not locals.
“I am sorry for all of this,” said Ohana, “but the ones who got hurt were on
the side that started it.”

Martin Hrehorcak, the “boyfriend” Ohana was referring to, said his
girlfriend never told guards not to admit Barash’s wife, but said Yerucham
insulted his girlfriend after she said Sidon was her rabbi. “It’s true that
I pushed and slapped the Israeli girl after she called my girlfriend a Nazi
pig,” he admitted. “But I did this to wake her up, not to hurt her. She has
a history of getting hysterical and when I was talking to her she wasn’t
answering, I thought she was going to have a fit, so I did what
psychiatrists recommend.” Hrehorcak said Ohana and other Chabad supporters
didn’t witness the event, but attacked him and others when they heard
Yerucham scream. He said he plans to press charges. “All of a sudden all of
these Chabad guys were attacking me and they injured my spine,” he said. “It
wasn’t about the girl only; this was about the conflict with Chabad and the
synagogue.”

Several attempts to reach Barash by phone were unsuccessful. Much has
transpired in the community since the contretemps with Sidon last year:
Jelinek was ousted as chairman last November in a community vote that was
attended mostly by Sidon supporters. He has challenged the vote and a new
community election is expected to take place next month. Two months ago, in
response to a previous request for judgement by Jelinek, a rabbinical judge
in Israel issued a ruling recognizing Barash as the official rabbi of the
Old-New Synagogue. Svab, the gabbai, said Barash must have been surprised to
see Sidon’s supporters enter the shul on Saturday. “As far as I know, the
only people who attended his services were Israelis and tourists,” he said
of Barash.


________

Thanks Rowen Berkely

ACROSS THE FORMER SOVIET UNION
Russian shul takeover leads to squabble in Jewish community
By Lev Krichevsky
http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?strwebhead=Russian+shul+takeover+causes+friction


MOSCOW, April 11 (JTA) — A recent takeover of a Moscow synagogue by Russia’s largest Jewish organization has again sparked tension within the country’s Jewish community. The conflict may torpedo any hope of a burgeoning alliance between the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia and the Russian Jewish Congress, whose new leader had announced an end to bitter infighting between the two groups.

In the center of the conflict is a three-story structure on the outskirts of
Moscow. It is one of the city’s five synagogue buildings. The building is
home to Darkei Shalom, a seven-year-old unaffiliated Orthodox congregation.
Two months ago, the Federation of Jewish Communities took over the
building — and the congregation’s rabbi fought back. The federation, which is headed by one of Russia’s chief rabbis, Berel Lazar, controls most of the country’s synagogues.

The synagogue was built by a Muslim philanthropist, Ryashid Bayazitov, who sought to create a “little Jerusalem” in the Russian capital by placing an Orthodox church, a mosque and a synagogue in one compound. When the synagogue was completed and offered free to Jewish organizations, none of the major groups in the community were interested in the financial burden associated with running a new synagogue in a remote neighborhood. Rabbi
David Karpov, a Moscow-born Chabadnik, accepted the offer. Since then,
Karpov, now 48, has created a congregation from scratch. The synagogue now offers a variety of religious and social activities, attracting 50-60 people to its Saturday morning services. Although he is a devoted follower of the late Lubavitcher rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, Karpov never allied himself with Lazar, the politically connected rabbi who is Chabad’s chief emissary in the former Soviet Union. Instead, Karpov affiliated with Chamah, a religious and social-welfare organization that runs several charitable and educational projects in Moscow. Karpov also has been a longtime member of the presidium of the Russian Jewish Congress. The most powerful player in Russian Jewish life in the mid-1990s, the group has been at odds with the federation during the past several years.

Who’s responsible for the dispute between the federation and Karpov depends on whom you ask. Bayazitov transferred the rights for the building to the federation. Karpov said it was Chabad’s plan to take over his congregation that made Bayazitov reconsider. The federation says the issue of who should run the shul originally was raised late last year by Bayazitov, who, according to Boruch Gorin, a spokesman for the federation, told JTA he was unhappy with how the synagogue functioned. “He got complaints that there were some marginal people in the synagogue, alcoholics, bums, that the synagogue was turned into a flophouse,” Gorin said, so he presented the federation with an ultimatum. “Either we establish order in the synagogue or else he closes the synagogue down.” Karpov dismissed the accusations.
“Everything is in order in the synagogue — to the extent one can talk about order in a synagogue.” Karpov said that indeed each week some 30 people sleep over in the synagogue for Shabbat, but he said these are the members of the congregation who cannot travel on the Jewish day of rest, and not “some bums,” as Gorin suggested. Bayazitov, a 40-year-old ethnic Tatar and a prominent businessman, was not available for comment.

Karpov said the only way for his congregation to have the issue resolved
would be through a rabbinical court, but there is no rabbinical court in
Russia whose ruling would be recognized by all the community’s factions.
Gorin and Karpov told JTA that Karpov was given an ultimatum — he could become a federation rabbi or he could leave the synagogue. But Karpov said this condition is unacceptable. “If I agree, as an employee of the FJC I might be removed from the synagogue at any moment,” he said. “I built this congregation and want to stay with the people who have their trust in me.” Karpov said his congregation was too weak to defend itself “unless someone stands up for us.” But the federation’s executive director, Rabbi Avraham
Berkowitz, denied the ultimatum was made. He said Karpov was asked only to follow federation guidelines, such as not allowing people to sleep in the synagogue. “No synagogue in the world has people sleeping in it,” he told JTA, adding that apartments are being offered to house anyone who might need a place to sleep on Shabbat.

The conflict has awakened tensions between the two groups, even after the new leader of the RJC, Vladimir Slutsker, said the feud would end. Last week, the RJC’s leadership called on the federation to resolve the conflict around the synagogue while retaining the shul’s independence. In response, a spokesman for the federation accused the RJC of a biased approach to the conflict and said that by making a public statement on the issue, RJC has taken upon itself “responsibility for aggravating” the situation in the Jewish community.

This week, the RJC made a public statement on the issue, criticizing the
Chabad federation over its handling of the crisis. Gorin responded by
calling RJC merely “one of the foundations in the Russian Jewish community, not even the largest one,” which “has no right to interfere in the issue.” Earlier, a group of non-Chasidic Orthodox rabbis affiliated with KEROOR, a rival group, issued a statement that said the incident around Darkei Shalom was just another in a string of similar incidents. Each time, they charged, the federation takes over religious properties and entire congregations by using its close ties with local and federal authorities.

Berkowitz denied that the government plays any role in these affairs, and
Gorin said his group sees nothing wrong about being the most successful player among Russian Jewish groups. He insisted that congregations themselves turn to the federation for support, not the other way around. “If we can run Jewish organizations better than any other organizations, we should not be shy about that,” he said. “And those congregations that are becoming part of the FJC are attracted to us by the possibility of having a strong sponsor.”

In the meantime, Karpov seems to be gearing up for a new stage in the
conflict. He said members of his congregation “are ready to take actions to defend their right to exist.” But, he added, he would prefer to resolve the issue peacefully.


Chabad Lubavitch dontcha just love the "Chosen"

_____

 

Noahide News part 166

 

 

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II

"Questions"

"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

 ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees

Exod-U.S the coming Geula 

anti-semitism?

Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

Noahide News Part 3

Noahide News Part 4

Noahide News Part 5

Noahide News Part 6

Noahide News Part 7

Noahide News Part 8

Noahide News Part 9

Noahide News Part 10

Noahide News Part 11

Noahide News Part 12

Noahide News Part 13

Noahide News Part 14

Noahide News Part 15

Noahide News Part 16

Noahide News Part 17

Noahide News Part 18

Noahide News Part 19

Noahide News Part 20

Noahide News Part 21

Noahide News part 22

Noahide News Part 23

Noahide News part 24

Noahide News Part 25

Noahide News Part 26

Noahide News part 27

Noahide News Part 28

Noahide News Part 29

Noahide News Part 30

Noahide News Part 31

Noahide News Part 32

Noahide News Part 33

Noahide News Part 34

Noahide News Part 35

Noahide News Part 36

Noahide News Part 37

Noahide News Part 38

Noahide News Part 39

Noahide News Part 40

Noahide News Part 41

Noahide News Part 42

Noahide News Part 43

Noahide News Part 44

Noahide News Part 45

Noahide News Part 46

Noahide News Part 47

Noahide News Part 48

Noahide News Part 49

Noahide News Part 50

Noahide News Part 51

Noahide News Part 52

Noahide News Part 53

Noahide News Part 54

Noahide News Part 55

Noahide NewsPart 56

Noahide News Part 57

Noahide News Part 58

Noahide News Part 59

Noahide News Part 60

Noahide News Part 61

Noahide News Part 62

Noahide News Part 63

Noahide News Part 64 

Noahide News Part 65

Noahide News Part 66

Noahide News Part 67

Noahide News Part 68

Noahide News Part 69

Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist

Noahide News Part 70

Noahide News Part 71

Noahide News Part 72

Noahide News Part 73

Noahide News Part 74

Noahide News Part 75

Noahide News Part 76

Noahide News Part 77

Noahide News Part 78

Noahide News Part 79

Noahide News Part 80

Noahide News Part 81

Noahide News Part 82

Noahide News Part 83 ALERT ALERT ALERT

Noahide News Part 84

Noahide News Part 85

Noahide News Part 86

Noahide News Part 87

Noahide News Part 88

Noahide News Part 89

Noahide News part 90

Noahide News Part 91

Noahide News Part 92

Noahide News Part 93

Noahide News Part 94

Noahide News Part 95

Noahide News Part 96

Noahide News Part 97

Noahide News Part 98

Noahide News Part 99

Noahide News Part 100

Noahide News Part 101

Noahide News Part 102

Noahide News Part 103

Noahide News Part 104

Noahide News Part 105

Noahide News Part 106

Noahide News Part 107

Noahide News Part 108

Noahide News Part 109

Noahide News Part 110

Noahide News Part 111

Noahide News Part 112

Noahide News Part 113

Noahide News Part 114

Noahide Naws Part 115

Noahide News Part 116

Noahide News Part 117

Noahide News Part 118

Noahide News Part 119

Noahide News Part 120

Noahide News Part 121

Noahide News Part 122

Noahide News Part 123

Noahide News Part 124

Noahide News part 125

Noahide News Part 126

Noahide News Part 127

Noahide News Part 128

Noahide News Part 129

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News Part 130

Noahide news Part 131

Noahide News Part 132

Noahide News Part 133

Noahide News Part 134

Noahide News Part 135

Noahide news Part 136

Noahide News Part 137

Noahide News Part 138

Noahide News Part 139

Noahide News Part 140

Noahide News Part 141

Noahide News Part 142

Noahide News Part 143

Noahide News Part 144  

Noahide news Part 147

Noahide News Part 148

Noahide News Part 149

Noahide News Part 150

Noahide News Part 151

Noahide News Part 152

Noahide News Part 153

Noahide News Part 154

NoahideNews Part 155

Noahide News Part 156

Noahide News Part 157

Noahide News Part 158

Noahide News Part 159

Noahide News Part 160

Noahide News Part 161

Noahide News Part 162

Noahide News Part 163

Noahide News Part 164

Noahide News Part 165

Noahide News part 166