Noahide News

 

Part 216

June 20, 2005 

 

 The FINISH 

of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.

mason seal

Extra Extra

http://www.shmais.com/picofdayall.cfm

 

Dedicated to Marsha, aka: Dead Dog Speaking or "Locust" who says her adversary is Jesus the Christ, who denies that the beast out of the Bottomless pit is their king, Moshiach they will have over them, who thinks that Jesus the Christ is the beast from the bottomless pit who goes into perdition. Who will not Repent of her sorceries and Blasphemy.

Rv:9:1: And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit.

Rv:9:2: And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit.

Rv:9:11: And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

Rv:11:7: And when they shall have finished their testimony,
the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.

the TWO Witnesses of Jesus the Christ the IAMHE

Rv:17:8: The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

Rv:20:1: And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.

Rv:20:3: And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

 

 

The King, they will have "OVER THEM"

Appointing a King
by the Tzemach Tzedek, 3rd Rebbe of Lubavitch

Explaining the commandment to appoint a King over Israel,
as it states
"put a King over yourself." (Devarim 17:15)

What is the Purpose of a Jewish King?

Moshiach ben satan the Son of perdition, who comes out of the bottomless pit, False Christ to deceive all who dwell upon the earth


We need to understand why Shmuel HaNovi (the prophet) became upset with the Jews when they asked him "give us a King" (Shmuel I 8:6). Even Hashem said to him "it is not you they have rejected, but Me...." What is the reason for this anger? After all, isn't this one of Hashem's commandments to appoint a King?

NO the LORD Jesus the Christ the Alpha and Omega from the beginning IS THE KING OF KINGS, whom they deny, and now Judeo Churchinsanity with them

 As the sages say, there are 3 commandments incumbent upon the Jews when the entered the land, one of which is to appoint a King (Sanhedrin 20b).

Sanhedrin is of the Authority of the Dragon

The root of what is intended by appointing a King is that in him and by him will the Jew be botel (nullified) to Hashem. 

sealed to their Covenant with death and hell they have made unto themselves

 

Because all Jews must be botel to the King and his officers. The King himself is botel to G-dliness...this is the main thing about a King, the reason he is called Melech (King) -- that he is a chariot (the meaning of a chariot is that it is nullified to the will of its driver) to midas malchuso in Atztilus (he is botel to the characteristic of G-d's Kingship in its purest degree). 

and God said he will not disanull their Covenant, they think to anull

Since the King is botel to the Kingship of heaven, and the Jews are botel to the King -- this makes the Jew (via the King) botel to G-dliness.

sons of the shemaGoG of satan

This is the constant job of the King -- to enable the created beings to be botel to Hashem through their being botel to him and him being botel to Hashem. There is also the simple meaning of appointing a King, that he should guide the nation appropriately. Because without leadership, "men would eat each other alive." The King dispenses justice and thus maintains society.

Noahide Laws unto the Dragon, Making the WORD of None effect to ALL who dwell upon the earth whose names are not written in the Lambs Book of Life slain from the foundation of the world

These two reasons for appointing a King are not applicable to the sages among the Jews, because among Jewish souls we find two types:

  1. those who are not sages, who are empty of Torah and G-dly wisdom, but nonetheless they are full of mitzvos (Law)  and are as careful as can be in turning away from evil and turning towards good, even in the finest details of Rabbinic decrees. This situation is due to the source of their soul, which is not suited to receiving the level of Torah and G-dly wisdom, only the level of deeds. This is exemplified by those who learn from a Rabbi, but as soon as they leave they forget everything and become fully involved in the details of day-to-day life;
  2. The high souls, sages who are able to master Torah, contemplating Hashem's wisdom and His Torah day and night.
Thus, according to the two reasons for appointing a King stated above, we find that only the simple souls need a King to guide them properly. One for whom Torah is his main activity, who can discern the permitted from the forbidden, for whom it is all as clear to him as the sun, a tzaddik who would never purposely sin -- according to the second reason (keeping the social order), what need does he have for a King? He only needs a prophet or a judge, like Shmuel. Nor is the first reason (nullification to Hashem via the King) applicable to him so much; this level is only applicable to those who are not sages and who lack bitul [nullification] in their essence above. This lack of bitul is the reason why they are not sages, because G-dly wisdom is the level of bitul, and those who are proud are fooled because G-dly wisdom cannot penetrate their "self-ness". Thus, they need a King to whom they can nullify their "self-ness". 

they need a mathematical physics degree

 

But sages are botel to Hashem in the root of their souls Above -- they have no need for a King to whom to be nullified, because they themselves are nullified.

are as gods in their laws

 High souls like the Rashbi (Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, author of the holy Zohar) are above the level of having a flesh and blood King, because sages such as he are called "children" to Hashem rather than "servants". This is why Shmuel did not want to give them a King -- because he wanted all Jews to be on this level. Then they wouldn't need a human King at all.

They do not need KING Jesus, for they are self righteous, through the Sith myth


Dovid Hamelech -- The Exemplary Jewish King
Dovid Hamelech (King David) was completely botel, a chariot. He guided the children of Israel like a shepherd, watching each and every sheep, providing spiritual needs and physical needs. He did this In a way unlike Kings who followed him. He was neshoma klolis, an all-inclusive soul. The guidance of the King is over every detail and deed of his people, and nothing is concealed from him.

Jesus the Christ is the ONLY KING who holds the keys to David

Why Will Moshiach be a King?
We still need to understand why it is that Moshiach will also be a King, because based on what is explained above it seems difficult to understand. At the time of the coming of Moshiach, may it be speedily in our days, all Jews will be sages, as it is stated "the entire world will be filled with the knowledge of G-d"  and that "no longer will a man teach his brother" . If so, why is a King needed?

to deceive the World



It is also difficult to understand the commandment in the Torah of appointing a King. After all, there is one Torah for all Jews, and therefore even sages have this commandment--which is difficult to understand based on what we explained above.

The truth is that level of Kingship applies even to sages, even when they are ones who contemplate Hashem's Torah and do not need the bitul of a servant, as described previously. The Kingship that applies to sages is a higher level of Kingship. The explanation is that the Torah is limitless, and there are endless levels, in the manner of one elevation after another in comprehending Torah. And in the time of Moshiach, there will be a revelation of G-dliness with comprehension of the inner Torah through Moshiach, who will teach the inner Torah to the entire people -- 

Dark sentences of Qabalah and Zohar sorceries and Blasphemy

even that which is presently concealed. It goes without saying that he himself will understand even more, since he won't be able to reveal and teach everything that he knows to the entire nation because they simply won't be able to absorb it.

Because of this (the fact that he will understand more than the rest of the nation) he is called a King, in the same way that a King here in this world is only a King insofar as his subjects are botel to him -- namely, that his understanding is above their understanding. After all, if something can be understood as having a good reason, one doesn't need a King's decree in the matter! Because even without the King's command this thing would be correct in and of itself and would appear good in the eyes of the (King's) subject.

Goobly Gock

 

 Rather, the decree of the King only applies to matters which go against his subject's intellect, and only due to his being botel to the King does he nullify his own will to that of the King -- because he doesn't know what is in the heart of the King (he doesn't know the reason why the King made this decree). 

OX-y  Moron of the red heifer, Golden Calf

This is called being botel to that which is above his own wisdom -- that even though the decree of the King doesn't make sense to him, he nonetheless obeys it. He does this because the King thinks it's right and surely the King has a good reason.

to deceive all who dwell upon the earth

The reason for the commandments (including such super-rational commandments as the Red Heifer) will be revealed in the future by Moshiach, though to him much more will be revealed, without end relative to what he can reveal to the people. Thus, Moshiach will be both a Rav (teacher) and a Melech (King) over Israel, even as all Jews will be on the level of sages to such a degree that even the reasons for commandments will be revealed to them. But Moshiach will not reveal everything that will be revealed to him, and his knowledge will be above the Jews; thus, he will reign as a King, because Kingship is that which is above the intellect of the recipient.

and he will snare them all by his dark sentences of Talmud Bavli the perversion of the Dragon and his minions of hell.

Thus, we see that Moshiach will be a Rav because he teaches the deepest secrets of the meanings of the commandments, but also a King because his knowledge will be so much greater than even those on the highest levels

________

Even More ISREALHELL TREASON

http://www.jta.org/index.asp

Subcommittee okays aid to Israel, Palestinians

A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee approved funds for Israel and the Palestinians.

The powerful Appropriations Committee’s foreign operations subcommittee approved standard levels of assistance for a number of Middle East countries last Thursday and doubled assistance for the Palestinians, to $150 million, per President Bush’s request. That $150 million is in addition to the same amount approved earlier this year in emergency assistance to the Palestinians, and carries with it the same conditions prohibiting direct assistance to the Palestinian Authority — and the same proviso allowing the president to waive those conditions.

The subcommittee also approved the expected $2.28 billion in military assistance to Israel, as well as funds for Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon. The full appropriations committee considers the bill Tuesday, and the full House is expected to consider it by the end of this month.

_______

http://www.jta.org/index.asp

House passes measures favoring Israel

Two pro-Israel measures were attached to the U.N. reform act passed by the U.S. House of Representatives.

The act, which passed last week and which recommends funding cuts if the United Nations fails to adopt accountability reforms, also would expand the Western European and Others Group at the United Nations to afford Israel permanent membership with full rights and privileges, said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), who authored the pro-Israel measures. “This would help guarantee Israel’s eligibility for leadership posts at all U.N. bodies and would help secure its participation in all U.N. forums,” she said.

To bring in Moshiach's Supra Bogey Government

The other pro-Israel measure would withhold funds commensurate with the cost of running offices “focused on the Palestinian agenda” until such offices are eliminated or consolidated into other U.N. groups.

______

Anti-Christ ISREALHELL

http://www.jta.org/index.asp

Kids love the ‘Code’

“The Da Vinci Code” tops Israeli high-schoolers’ lists of favorite books.

According to an Education Ministry study released this week, Dan Brown’s best-selling book, as well as Mark Haddon’s “The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time,” are the books most read by Israeli 11th- and 12th-graders. In junior high schools, J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” won out.

The survey was commissioned as part of efforts to encourage reading among Israeli youth and offset the growing popularity of television and computer games

______

 

"Pipes of divine flow"

O Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
From glen to glen and down the mountainside
The summer's gone and all the roses falling
'Tis you, 'tis you must go and I must bide.

Tradition of the elders

The Beard

 

    From the onset of Chassidism, and especially amongst Chabad Chassidim, there has always been an emphasis placed on maintaining a full untrimmed beard.
    The purpose of this essay is to explain the reasons and rationale that lie behind the wearing of a beard. These include the many benefits and blessings that one receives for keeping one’s beard. There are those, who are unaware of the importance of the beard and this has led some to begin trimming their beard, tearing out the hair root, or in some instances, shaving.
  •  
  • I. The Halachic Prohibitions
  •  

    There are many famous Halachic issues involved in removing a beard. The Sefer Hadras Panim Zakan brings literally hundreds of Poskim [Halachic authorities] that discuss these issues. It is not possible to present all the opinions on this subject, so we will focus on the opinion of the third Lubavitcher Rebbe, the Tzemach Tzedek , which is the authoritative opinion as far as Lubavitcher Chassidim are concerned. The Tzemach Tzedek did not just regard the discussion about wearing beards as an academic matter, in fact, he waged many battles for its observance. The Russian Czar Nikolai I wanted to institute a policy making it mandatory for all Jews to shave. The Tzemach Tzedek exerted himself and through Mesiras Nefesh [self-sacrifice] was able to get this decree revoked.

 

    A summary of the Tzemach Tzedek’s opinion follows:

 

    A. It is forbidden to remove the beard through scissors, (even with those that do not resemble a razor) or through depilatories (hair removal through medicine). This is due to the law of Payos Hazakain, “Neither shall you mar the corners of your beard.”

 

    B. Those who remove their beards transgress the Torah law of, “A man shall not wear the garment of a woman.” Some authorities hold that this brings with it a punishment of Malkos (lashing). This reason applies even to those who cut their beard with a scissors.

 

    C. Removing the beard without a razor can lead one to remove the beard with a razor – leading to a transgression of Torah law. Furthermore, using a scissors to cut the beard violates the reason that underlies the prohibition (Taam Hamitzvah ).

 

    D. The hairs of the beard contain a high degree of holiness as is taught in Tanach and the words of the Rabbis.

 

    E. The Rabbis from the time of the receiving of the Torah were accustomed not to remove their beards

 

    F. There is a basis to permit the removal of hair that is under the throat (totally out of the area of the “corners”) but due to the fact that we do not know the exact place of the Payos (corners), we should be strict in this matter.

 

    The Rebbe disapproved of the practice of trimming the beard, and says that the Tzemach Tzedek himself requires one to refrain from trimming.

 

    In regard to pulling out the hairs of the beard, the Arizal writes that, it is strictly prohibited to pull or uproot even one of the hairs anywhere on the beard, because they are “pipes for a divine flow.” (They are a path by which the Divine blessings and revelations are channeled to a person.)
  •  
  • II. The Benefits
  •  

    Maintaining a beard carries with it great advantages, as the Tzemach Tzedek writes: “Therefore, he who doesn’t shave his beard or touch it with metal at all, awakens the Yud Gimel Tikkunei Dikna.” (This refers to a very high spiritual level as is known to those well versed in Kabbala and Chassidus.)

    If it seems that wearing a beard relates only to abstract spiritual levels, the following are two letters that the Rebbe wrote addressing this subject:

    “Without quoting here what it says in the Inner part of Torah and in the holy Zohar and in many Seforim, that the hairs of the beard are the idea of Yud Gimel Tikkunei Dikna; and how they elicit success in learning Torah and fulfilling Mitzvos, behold everyone agrees that the beard is a part of the Tzelem Elokim (G-dly image) and removing the beard, even according to those who permit it in certain ways, nevertheless, [this person] lacks the G-dly image.”

    “In regard to the idea of growing one’s beard, it is simple that according to all opinions there is an important point in it, and all the differing opinions are whether to permit [the removal of the beard] when one must [remove it] so to speak, and whether this is a Rabbinical or Torah prohibition. But, as mentioned above, it is simple in the revealed part of Torah, and specifically and strongly in the Inner part of Torah, that in the Tikkunei Dikna (as they are called in Zohar and Kabbala Seforim, which are accepted by all Jews with the full strength of the Oral Torah) there is a very high level of holiness, and the attribute of Hashem is Midda K’negged Midda [measure for measure]. A measure [the beard hair] of man [below] elicits the same measure from above, so to speak. "

    As can be seen from the above letters, the hairs of the beard are the receptacle for Divine blessing in one’s day-to-day life.

    Furthermore, even those who disagree with the Tzemach Tzedek in this matter, concur that a beard is a sign of Yiras Shamayim [fear of Heaven]. The Rebbe writes in a letter, expressing his amazement that someone without a beard should be involved in making Tefillin because the one who wears the Tefillin is dependent on the Yiras Shamayim of the one who fashioned them.

    There is a story told that a man once came to one of the Chabad Rabbeim and asked him: “Why are Chabad Chassidim so careful not to touch their beards, but are not as scrupulous when it comes to Loshon Hora [evil talk]?”

    The Rebbe answered him, “To speak Loshon Hora doesn’t require a great deal of contemplation – it comes before one even realizes what he is saying. However to touch one’s beard, a person has to make a conscious decision to act."

    In another letter the Rebbe writes: a certain man came to him with complaints about wearing a beard. The Rebbe asked him, “Why is it that when someone conjures up an image of Moshe Rabbeinu or Aharon Hakohen, whether Jewish or not, they picture them with a big beard?”

    The man answered that not only when he imagines Moshe Rabbeinu but even when he thinks about people who kept Torah and Mitzvos throughout the generations, he imagines them with a full untouched beard.

    III. Conclusion

    It seems clear that that there are many Halachic reasons to refrain from shaving or trimming one’s beard. There are many blessings that are elicited through keeping a beard, both in a material and spiritual sense. The choice seems obvious...

_____

 

Education Day USA, "No Child Left behind from satan's Noahide Democrazy"

http://canada.metropolis.net/research-policy/cern-pub/CERNnewsletter_mar_2005.htm

Involuntary Particularism: What the Noahide Laws Tell Us About Citizenship and Alienage
Gidon Rothstein

http://www.aleph-institute.org/

Aleph attempts to assist all, regardless of their religious observance, affiliation, background or lack of one. Aleph has also developed educational programs for non-Jews, based on the Seven Noahide Laws (universal code of ethics and morality) that are applicable to all of humankind, and provides social services to all who reach out to us, regardless of race, creed, sex, color or religion.

 

Let this Viper Rot in his Grave unto eternal shame

National Day of Reflection

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Amid the distractions and concerns of our daily existence, it is appropriate that Americans pause to reflect upon the ancient ethical principles and moral values which are the foundation of our character as a nation.

We seek, and steadfastly pursue, the benefits of education. But education must be more than factual enlightenment-it must enrich the character as well as the mind.

One shining example for people of all faiths of what education ought to be is that provided by the Lubavitch movement, headed by Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, a worldwide spiritual leader who will celebrate his 80th birthday on April 4, 1982. The Lubavitcher Rebbe's work stands as a reminder that knowledge is an unworthy goal unless it is accompanied by moral and spiritual wisdom and understanding. He has provided a vivid example of the eternal validity of the Seven Noahide Laws, a moral code for all of us regardless of religious faith. May he go from strength to strength.

In recognition of the Lubavitcher Rebbe's 80th birthday, the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States in Congress assembled have issued House Joint Resolution 447 to set aside April 4, 1982, as a "National Day of Reflection."

NOW, THEREFORE, I, RONALD REAGAN, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim April 4, 1982, as National Day of Reflection.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and sixth.

Ronald Reagan

Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson
Lubavitch
770 Eastern Parkway
Brooklyn, N.Y. 11213

By the Grace of G-d
25th of Nissan, 5742
Brooklyn, N. Y.

President Ronald Reagan
The White House
Washington, D. C.

Greeting and Blessing:

Because of the Intervening Passover season, the Festival of Our Liberation, this is my first opportunity of acknowledging your gracious letter of April 2, 1982. I wish to assure you, Mr. President, and the First Lady, that I deeply appreciate your warm felicitations and good wishes on the occasion of my birthday.

I particularly appreciate your thoughtful and profoundly meaningful message that serves as the preamble to your Proclamation of a National Day of Reflection, in conjunction with the said occasion.

Following, as it does, your Proclamation of a National Day of Prayer, your Proclamation of a National Day of Reflection is not only eminently consistent with it, but indeed a corollary thereof. By focusing attention on "the ancient ethical principles and moral values which are the foundation of our character as a nation," and on the time-honored truth that "education must be more than factual enlightenment - it must enrich the character as well as the mind," while reaffirming the eternal validity of the G-d-given Seven Noahide Laws (with all their ramifications) for people of all faiths - you have expressed most forcefully the real spirit of the American nation.

More than ever before the civilized world of today will look up to the United States of America for guidance as behooves the world's foremost Super Power - not merely in the ordinary sense of this term but even more importantly, as a moral and spiritual Super Power, whose real strength must ultimately derive from an unalterable commitment to the universal moral code of the Ten Commandments. Indeed, it is this commitment to the same Divine truths and values that, more than anything else, unites all Americans in the true sense of E Pluribus Unum.

With prayerful wishes for Hatzlachah (success) in carrying out your enormous responsibilities for the benefit of all Americans and all mankind, and with esteem and blessing,

Cordially 

M. Schneerson

____


Above and below: President Ronald Reagan meets with Chabad representatives and signs the National Scroll of Honor on the occasion of the Rebbe's birthday

____

George W. Bush, High Treason, Blasphemy and MURDER, No Child left behind from Satan, and you apostate JUDEO-Churchinsanity have passed your children through the fire unto MOLECH, haha Moshiach, the Son of perdition.

 

For Immediate Release

Office of the Press Secretary

March 25, 2002

Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.

Proclamation

By the President of the United States of America


A Proclamation

America's future depends in part on ensuring that every child in America receives a quality education. And by teaching our children the importance of serving those in need, (Talmudic Hassidic Jews) we will help fulfill an important part of their education, showing them the rewards that come from compassionate outreach.

Education has always played a vital role in the success of our Nation. It has provided hope through the principle that any citizen can realize the American dream, regardless of background, ethnicity, or faith. By challenging young people to set high goals and to work hard to achieve them, we prepare our youth to carry on the success of the American story and to become leaders of this great Nation. A core foundation of knowledge and values is essential for students to excel and contribute to the well-being of our communities, our country, and the world. Parents are a child's first and most important teachers, and they provide the cornerstone of a child's early education. Quality teachers, however, also play an important role in a child's personal and intellectual development. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which I signed into law in January 2002, requires that, by the end of the 2005-06 school year, there must be a "highly qualified" teacher in every classroom. Through this new law, States and school districts will have multiple tools to help them meet the new teacher quality requirements. Key elements of this effort include providing State grants to recruit and train teachers, and recruiting high-quality individuals to become teachers, offering expanded student loan forgiveness for teachers. And we must encourage Americans to volunteer their time to serve as mentors to our young people.

HERE comes the TREASON and Bushkeviks Hassidic TREASON and Blasphemy against jesus the Christ, for this Viper bastard is anti-Christ, a servant of his RED Sofiet Esau. What doe a Viper anti-Christ Chabad Lubavitch who hates Jesus the Christ have to DO WITH this LAW? Are you too stupid and apostate, you cannot understand?

Great teachers are also found outside the classroom, making a positive impact on children and on local families. For example, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, demonstrated the power of teaching others to pursue both intellectual and moral excellence. For this purpose, he established education and outreach centers that offered social services and humanitarian aid. Today, more than 1,400 of these centers operate in 35 countries, meeting the spiritual and material needs of local communities.

Thanks to George's non faith based initiative

 These beacons of hope communicate the Rebbe's ideal of living a meaningful life through personal responsibility and dedication to those in need.

Yes indeed, the talmudic shemborg collective

On the 100th anniversary of the Rebbe's birth, I encourage Americans to help teach our young people. In classrooms, homes, and places of worship, we can all make a lasting impact on individual children and thus invest in our country as a whole. NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 24, 2002, as Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A., 2002. I call on all Americans to help our young people better understand the importance of character and develop a true love of learning. By doing so, we invest in the future of our country. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-sixth. GEORGE W. BUSH

Damned to eternal damnation and everlasting Shame. Robert G. Pickle

 

If you are with them, you are 

ANTI CHRIST

____

The Evangelical Apostate Churchinsanity proselyte, Noahide "Left behind" Tim Lehaye series

the Left Behind series portrays the lie that a person who is "forced" to take the "Mark of the Beast" may still be in right standing with God and go to Heaven! 

_______

Apostate, complacent Amaraka, you were taken by these RED Sofiets Talmudic Hassidim of the beast from within by Treason, sorcery and Blasphemy, and even now in these last days you refuse to REPENT in Jesus the Christ Mighty Name, and your destruction is NIGH

Jan Feldman.
Lubavitchers as Citizens: 

Policy Review logo
21 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC 20036  (202) 466-6730  FAX: (202) 466-6733
Published by the Hoover Institution

A Paradox of Liberal Democracy.
Cornell University Press. 212 pages. $32.50

ighly educated Americans tend to have little place in their imagination and less patience in their hearts for the devoutly religious. The cruder among the highly educated dismiss religion as a crude relic of a bygone era. Moderates may tell you that religion, in moderation, is a fine thing. From time to time, they may indulge in it themselves at weddings, at funerals, and at the celebration each year of a few major holidays. But the devoutly religious, especially if they are fellow citizens, especially if they belong to faiths that have become part of the American mainstream, especially if they are fellow Christians and Jews, are another matter. It’s not that those who place religious belief at the center of their lives are, for that reason, more inclined to break the law or impose a special financial burden on the state. No, what truly discomfits so many of the highly educated about the devoutly religious is the determination to stand apart, to refuse to join in, to go their own way.

 

But why? For the most part, devoutly religious Christians and Jews happily embrace modernity’s great political achievements — individual rights and equality before the law. So the problem is more with what the devoutly religious stand for. To varying degrees, they say “no thank you” to the glorification of one of modernity’s moral ideals,  autonomy, as well as to its many enticements — sexual liberation, popular culture, and affluent, commercial society. And notwithstanding the high-flown theorizing the highly educated can put forward to justify their distaste and the impartiality and universality they may claim for their reasoning, it is this “no thank you,” no matter how politely put, that rankles and drives them to distraction.

 

What is true of many highly educated people tends to be more true of our professional political theorists. Indeed, most schools of political theory, it seems, have reason for denigrating the devoutly religious. Academic liberals dislike the proud dependence of the devoutly religious on external authorities, particularly spiritual leaders and God. Communitarians, when brought face-to-face with a real-life, tightly-knit community in which individuals are commanded to subordinate their private desires to the community’s good, suddenly discover that the good of community consists in no small measure in its having been chosen freely by those who belong to it

With barely distinguishable differences in emphasis, deliberative democrats and civic republicans wax indignant about the failure of religiously devout parents to educate their children for the responsibilities of citizenship, primary among which the theorists believe is the responsibility to engage regularly in vigorous public debate about constitutional first principles and the fine points of public policy. Too often, feminists, regardless of what devoutly religious women say about the dignity and fulfillment of their lives, cannot bring themselves to see in them anything but subordination to men. And multiculturalists find themselves confounded by a group within their midst — rather than safely located on some distant shore — whose members do not regard multiculturalism as a supreme value that ought to be affirmed by each member of the group.

But don’t be fooled by the profusion of scholarly slogans and schools. When all is said and done, the vast majority of these theorists see eye-to-eye. They are all — at least those who belong to the dominant schools — progressive liberals. Of course progressive liberalism needn’t go hand-in-hand with a Voltairean hostility to religion. As the exemplary writings of William Galston, Charles Taylor, and Michael Walzer have demonstrated, respect for the wisdom, beauty, and even truth of religion can be compellingly combined with a belief in government’s high responsibility to protect the powerless and voiceless. Nevertheless, a sizeable majority of our political theorists, in the name of progress and freedom — or under some other name but in the service of a progressive interpretation of individual freedom — insist upon, or at least would welcome, state intervention, particularly in the form of inculcation by the public schools, of the right virtues and values in order to correct the beliefs and practices of the children of the devoutly religious.

 

Proponents of this view are called “perfectionist liberals”; they believe that it is the task of the liberal state to perfect the liberalism of its citizens. They welcome state intervention not merely for the public good, but for the sake of the devoutly religious themselves, in order to save them or at least their children from their supposedly unfulfilling, backward, and degrading faith. Perfectionist liberals are not much perturbed, if they notice it at all, by the intolerance that underwrites their determination to use government to save, or transform the souls of, their fellow citizens and their belief that the state has not only a right but a duty to do so.

 

From another vantage point, the religiously devout are to many of today’s political theorists what Jews were to Christian thinkers in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries: an embarrassment and a reproach. If Christianity represented the transcendence of the Law, what but stubbornness, such thinkers asked, could account for the determination by Jews to adhere to their ancestral ways? No doubt many simply assumed the falsity of Judaism. But for some, the question was driven by a nagging, perhaps subterranean doubt: What if the Jews knew something important? What if Christianity had not transcended God’s revelation to Moses? Similarly, many political theorists today silently presume that in our enlightened age it can only be the stubborn refusal to see the light that explains the resolve of the devoutly religious to cling to their peculiar beliefs. Some come to this conclusion because of an atheism as invincible as it is unprovable. But, in the case of the more acute, lurking behind the presumption is also an anxiety: What if the religiously devout know something that we do not know, something to which we prefer to close our eyes lest it complicate our lives? And in this anxiety lies an opportunity.

 

It is political scientist Jan Feldman’s startling contention that the Lubavitcher Jews have a great deal to teach academic political theorists, particularly perfectionist liberals, about citizenship and liberalism. It is also an audacious contention. The Lubavitchers are a school of Hasidism (also known as Chabad)

PHARISEES

 whose members revere the late Menachem Mendel Schneerson of Crown Heights, Brooklyn, the Lubavitcher rebbe. They are not just any devoutly religious group. Numbering between 150,000 and 200,000 worldwide, with perhaps another 250,000 maintaining close ties, the Lubavitchers have been described in the New York Times, not without cause, as “the most ambitious, aggressive, and, at times, detested Jewish movement.” In contrast to most movements within Judaism, including much of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Judaism, they are seen as proselytizers, political opportunists, and zealous proclaimers of the Messiah.

Moshiach ben satan that son of perdition

 Feldman’s book, the work of a woman who is herself both a professor and an observant Jew with “a close affiliation with Lubavitch,” succeeds in humanizing the Lubavitchers and in capturing the rhythm of their lives, built around the Hasidic belief that even ordinary people can hasten the coming of the messiah through the joyous, enthusiastic fulfillment of the commandments. 

invoke the Dragon

She also exposes some typical limitations of academic political theory concerning the devoutly religious. But neither a friendly portrayal of their faith nor a critique of the excesses of the academics leaves the Lubavitchers as immune from criticism as she would have readers believe.

 

hat strikes the eye first about the Lubavitchers is their anachronistic appearance: the men in their black hats and black suits and bushy beards (which replicate the appearance of eighteenth century Polish aristocrats); the women in their long skirts and long sleeves and big wigs (which they believe protect the dignity of men as well as women); and the parents with their great gaggles of children (who reflect the priorities they believe imposed on the them by God’s commandments). Of course the Lubavitchers are also known for their massive outreach programs. The mobilized faithful can be seen in the pale and awkward young men hovering beside their mitzvah-mobiles on college campuses and busy city street corners, insistently inviting Jews passing by to step into the back of their open U-Haul trucks to say a prayer, and in the establishment around the world of Chabad Houses that provide Torah study, a Shabbat meal, and a seat at holiday feasts to Jews away from home. And the Lubavitchers are notorious for their enthusiasm for their spiritual leader, investing the Lubavitcher rebbe, in death as in life, with mystical, messianic, world-redemptive powers.

 

So the chasm between the Lubavitcher life and the liberal or progressive life is real and wide. It also provides Feldman with her opening. For the liberal life places a special emphasis on respecting humanity in its breathtaking diversity, and so is compelled by its own principles to, at minimum, tolerate much that it finds disagreeable in the Lubavitcher life and, at its best, to come to grips with what is respectable in the Lubavitcher life.

 

Feldman, who, with her family, lived for a year among the Lubavitchers in Montreal and whose research is also based on a wealth of detailed interviews, does not gaze at the Lubavitchers through rose-colored glasses. She does, though, leave to others the unseemly thrill of airing the community’s dirty linen (in recent years others have stepped to the plate). She understands the complexities of what Martin Buber had in mind when he described ultra-orthodox Jews in Jerusalem as at once “sublime and grotesque.” Yet Feldman has her priorities. She wants to bring into focus what is sublime in the Lubavitchers and to show that much that strikes the secular intellectual as grotesque in their ways is based on a failure of understanding and want of sympathetic imagination.

 

At the same time, her inquiry, which grows out of her personal concerns as observant Jew and professional political theorist, is narrowly focused. What she especially wants to know is whether, in a liberal democracy, one can be both a good Lubavitcher and a good citizen. Although Lubavitchers see no particular contradiction, the preponderance of opinion among her fellow professional political theorists, she stresses, is that one can’t. Because of their faith, the expert consensus goes, the devoutly religious
are incapable of informed, rational, autonomous political deliberation. They are assumed to march in lockstep to the polls to cast their leader’s vote. They are seen as refusing to be bound by the accepted standard of “reasonable public speech” because they may refer to Torah, the core of Jewish law, for guidance. This is regarded as a breach of political civility. Finally, they are perceived as rejecting our fundamental principles of justice and democracy when they reject liberal values. We put the burden of proof on them to demonstrate that their “otherness” is not a threat to us.

 

Feldman thinks that the expert consensus, which reflects the predominance in the academy of perfectionist or, as she sometimes refers to it, “militant” liberalism, is partly right and partly wrong. It is partly right because the Lubavitchers do reject the image of the good citizen as the freely choosing, autonomous individual subject to no authority save his own critical intellect. But it is partly wrong because it conflates one peculiar and demanding interpretation of good citizenship with democratic citizenship as such.

Noahide laws against Jesus the Christ, Anti-Christ treasonous Vipers RED Sofiet Talmudic Blasphemers of the Sanhedrin of the Dragon of HELL and are contrary unto all mankind

Feldman can’t quite bring herself to say that the theorists’ rarefied conception of citizenship is unreasonable in its demands and illiberal in its reach. Yet it is, because it demands a specific orientation of the mind and because it reaches beyond lawful outer conduct to pry into matters of conscience. Instead, she sets out to show that nothing in the Lubavitcher life stands in the way of the lesser and bottom-line requirements of merely democratic citizenship, by which she seems to mean the ordinary, common-sense view that citizenship in a free country largely consists in obeying the law, voting one’s interest and one’s conscience, and caring for oneself, one’s family, and one’s community.

The Law IS JESUS the Christ fulfilled, and that Talmudic chassid rabid rib-eyes of Hell, WILL NOT BE REMOVED from his saints who will stand Firm, many who are already doing so against your DRAGON of HELL and his Sanhedrin

Given this looser understanding, the Lubavitcher rebbe, Feldman earnestly contends, can be seen as a “friendly critic of American democracy.”

Enemy of Christ Jesus....anti Christ and of satan

While devoted to religious freedom, he also believed that the best arguments for religious freedom, and the virtues necessary for maintaining it, had religious sources. In fact, the religious grounding of religious freedom has great precursors in the American intellectual tradition, particularly the Puritans who set sail from England in order to find a land where they could practice their austere religion as conscience dictated. What would have undoubtedly astounded our Puritan forbears, however, was the rebbe’s belief that the religion on which freedom and democracy in America particularly depended was Torah Judaism.

worship of the Dragon

 

While wishing to bolster what they believe to be the foundations of democracy in America, the rebbe’s followers have no desire to alter or abolish them, argues Feldman. They embrace the rabbinic teaching, dina d’malchuta, dina, or the law of the land is law.

and the Treasonous Vipers of the 102nd Congress of the United States of ISREALHELL, and the BUSH family have embraced the DRAGON, and apostate "Amaraka" you have accepted freely, and no not YOU HAVE ALREADY received the MARK of their beast, Moshiach ben Dragon the son of perdition, and are fallen away from truth in Righteousness, and are damned and perish for you believe not the TRUTH, God has sent you a strong delusion and YOU BELIEVE the LIE. You are become TWO fold, THE Children of Hell, and their proselytes....behold Judeo-Churchinsanity........ 

 

 And they emphasize that the seven Noahide Laws — constituting the covenant entered into by Noah and God after the Flood — include respect for other human beings, respect for their rights and property, and the creation of a judicial system, and are binding on all humanity.

and REJECTING the Creator the WORD, Christ Jesus the IAMHE, even as they have.

 These religious principles, grounded in the Torah (TALMUD BAVLI, MIshnah TORAH)  and elaborated in the Talmud, form the backbone of the Lubavitchers’ theological justification for honoring liberal democracy in America.

 worship unto the Dragon of HELL, anti Christ

The Lubavitchers, however, do not simply embrace the protections of civil and criminal law, mind their own business, and withdraw from public life. In fact, they have shown a certain facility with the mess and the mechanics of the democratic process and have established themselves as significant political players in Canada as well as in America. In 1994, their representatives on Capitol Hill demonstrated their comfort in the halls of power by successfully lobbying for the rebbe to receive the Congressional Gold Medal.

ROOT these Vipers OUT and REPENT apostate Amaraka for if not you will surely Perish in your sins

In general, Jews in North America are the most progressive of ethnic and racial groups. At the same time, most ultra-orthodox Jews avoid the politics of the secular state. In contrast to both, the Lubavitchers, Feldman notes, have their own agenda

TREASON, Blasphemy, sorcery and the lust of their father the murderer, and murder they do....well

They have entered the political fray both to pursue narrow, local goals, seeking to obtain more of government’s scarce resources for their communities, and to advance the largest, most universal goals, the hastening of the messiah’s arrival and the redemption of the world, the best known instance of which is their fight to display giant menorahs in public places in order to increase the nation’s spirituality.

They invoke the Son of Perdition and the Nation has indeed fallen away from the TRUTH, as has most of the world

While politically aggressive, the Lubavitchers defy conventional partisan categories. They are, Feldman reports the Lubavitcher emissary in Washington saying, “sometimes to the left of the Democrats, and sometimes to the right of Republicans.” 

They control both parities and are Facist Nassi's of their SOS Jackbooted Hoodlum haha unto their dragon and his beast sanhedrin and her Beast Moshiach ben satan they are about to reveal and the world will marvel and apostate Amaraka has already embraced with open arms in her two fold anti-Christ three gods blasphemy

 

They would keep abortion “safe, legal, and rare” but favor school prayer. They strongly support social welfare programs but support with equal strength school vouchers and military spending. They oppose gay marriage but also oppose discrimination against minorities and favor criminalizing “hate speech.” They embrace the separation of church and state but reject the idea that the public square should be denuded of religious symbols.

They are double minded Hypocrites of confusion and they DO LIE and they Do murder and they DO Blasphemy the KING of KINGS as do their Judeo-Churchite mammonite prosperity devils the evangelicals

So why do so many schools of professional political theory, above all the perfectionist liberals, implicitly condemn Lubavitchers as bad citizens? 

BECAUSE they worship LUCIFER

The problem, according to Feldman, lies less with the Lubavitchers than with the theorists’ fantastically ambitious conception of citizenship, which lays claim not merely to the individual citizen’s outer conformity to law but to the personality or spirit that citizens bring to political life. What has usually been thought good enough in a free society — earning a living, raising a family, worshiping God as you see fit or not, pursuing your interests as you understand them, casting or not casting your vote, arguing if you like with fellow citizens, and all the while refraining from infringing the rights of others — is thought not good enough by many of our leading theorists. What a free citizen owes his or her fellow citizens, according to them, turns out to be rather more rigorous. It requires a specific kind of personality, which as it happens coincides exactly with many political theorists’ idealized self-image.

shemborg Talmudic collective of shame

This personality celebrates the multiplicity of goods, the openness of choices, the subjectivity of values, the rights of individuals, and the diversity of societies. Valuing these goods of course can form, or contribute to the formation of, an appealing personality. But according to the perfectionist liberals, it should not be optional. Parents and government have an obligation to instill these beliefs in their children. Parents play their part by exposing their children to a wide variety of lifestyles, and government plays its by ensuring a public school curriculum that reinforces the lesson. To do less is to deprive young people of the opportunity to choose for themselves what is right and good.

 

The question, though, is whether requiring this much deprives parents of their right to educate their children as they believe proper. And the danger is that this form of education exalts the act of choice at the expense of the thing chosen, fostering a confusion between the freedom to choose in accordance with what is right and good and the rightness and goodness of whatever individuals choose.

FORCE

 

Indeed, by making the celebration of autonomous choice the ticket of admission to the public square, the political theorists’ favored conception of citizenship takes sides against the central teaching of devout Christians and Jews that what is needful is loving recognition of Him to whom one owes obedience. Of course, if the devoutly religious life were truly irrational and manifestly cultivated bad citizens, which is the underlying conceit of much contemporary citizenship theory, then such undermining could hardly be considered a loss.

 

But is the Lubavitcher way truly irrational? Are you a bad citizen if you do not pledge allegiance to critical rationality and individual autonomy? Feldman answers with a resounding “no.” The Lubavitcher life displays its own rationality, she contends, which the liberal life can’t see or won’t consider.

 

In defending her claim, Feldman manages to go not far enough and also too far. What Feldman should have said but does not say is that the Lubavitcher life embodies goods that political theorists ought to appreciate and is based on claims about humanity’s obligations and God’s governance that they lack reasons for rejecting, as they are wont to do, out of hand. 

Jesus the Christ is the LORD of LORD and these hassidic Talmudic Vipers are Anti-Christ, and you are cowards and are two fold in bed with the Great WHORE, Amaraka the Apostate 

But what she should not have said but does say is that there are two rationalities, a Lubavitcher rationality and a liberal rationality.

a Repuppetken Neocon Talmudic God and a Liberal DEMON-Cratic god, and neither is the LORD GOD

 While perspectives are multiple and conflicting, and while wisdom comes in many forms, there is only one reason. And the Lubavitcher life, by taking a great deal on faith and placing it securely beyond question or doubt, substantially restricts reason’s operation.

 

Feldman finds rationality pervading the Lubavitcher life. Central to it, as for all observant Jews, is Torah study. 

study of Talmud bavli Mishnah Torah, of the dragon, Blasphemy, sorcery and MURDER, and they control The satanist George W. Bush the Treasonous Murderous Viper in the Whore House in the Chabad Washington DC

This education, Feldman argues, is anything but rote, mechanical, or dogmatic. Young men, and increasingly young women, hone their intellects through endless hours poring over the Talmud and confronting its conflicting commentaries and interpretations, multiple layers of play and paradox, and constant posing of dissenting opinion. 

CONFUSION unto their DRAGON

While such study has its fixed points — the sovereignty of God, the sanctity of Torah, the wisdom of the sages — 

the Dragon, His perversion and his useless men of sorcery and Blasphemy

 

it forms an endless school in the complexity of human affairs. And while such study often encourages hair-splitting and distinction-mongering, it constantly calls attention to the exalted purpose — the love of God and the repair of the world — for which it is undertaken.

the straining of gnats, swallowing camels and flesh blasphemy of their Dragon and his Moshiach ben perdition

 

But what of the Lubavitcher conviction that the world is 5,763 years old and that evolution is myth? And how about their belief in the efficacy of prayer, in the divine supervision of the world, in the miraculous powers of righteous men (tzaddkim), in the obligation to obey strictly an ancient legal code (halacha)? What place can these beliefs and convictions have in a liberal and enlightened world? Feldman readily concedes that many will find Lubavitcher beliefs “strange, incomprehensible, even downright crazy.” But invoking the bedrock liberal distinction between public life and private life, she argues that such convictions and beliefs are not political in nature and demand nothing special from the polity. As for the case of Simcha Goldman, an observant Jew and captain in the U.S. Army who did demand something special, the right to wear his kippah (skullcap) while in uniform, Feldman sees it as an example of the constitutional order working as it should. Goldman took his claim to the courts, the Supreme Court decided Goldman had no right, and eventually Congress passed legislation effectively overruling the Court by granting the right.

Yet they, will slay by their Talmud Bavli and their laws unto the Dragon, by force, any who will not DENY Jesus the Christ the LORD GOD Almighty. And these sick perverted Talmudic Chassidim jews and all who follow them are cast into the pit where death and hell and their Moshiach ben satan and his false prophet are cast, very, very soon, for it is WRITTEN and Iniquity is almost finished

But what of the women? Surely the way the Lubavitchers treat their women rises to the level of public concern. And to an extent it does. Like all citizens, the Lubavitchers are prohibited by the laws of the land from depriving their female children of a basic education, from assaulting and battering their women or physically harming them in any way and, once they reach maturity, from blocking their exit from the community.

IF not for the Goyim laws, would there be any Hassidic Jewish WOMEN who are not beaten and humiliated? And now that their laws are passed, Guess what Feminazi's of Apostate Amaraka? You are denounced to secondary citizen's one more, for their sickness prevails

 But beyond that, the state must mind its own business. No doubt some will shudder at the thought of allowing Lubavitcher parents to teach their children that men and women are subject to overlapping but differing catalogues of divine commandments; that, owing to the quality of natural differences or the quality of their souls, women must take a leading role at home while men must take a leading role in public; that separation of the sexes should be the norm and that women should dress modestly in public and hide their hair under wigs lest they sexually arouse easily arousable men.

sounds like the Church of God group

 But a shudder is not an argument. And the arguments for liberating the women (and children) of the devoutly religious from their parents, however ingenious, that the citizenship theorists muster to justify their shudder turn on assigning the state responsibility for the health of the hearts and souls of its citizens. But no healthy liberal state can properly claim citizens as its creatures, to be compressed into a mold of the state’s own making.

 

Furthermore, in a critical respect, the Lubavitcher life enhances women’s choices. As Feldman emphasizes, Lubavitcher communities have become home to many ba’alot teshuva, literally “masters of return.” These are women who have grown up in secular, educated and, in many cases, well-to-do households but have chosen to adopt the Lubavitcher way of life. In her conversations with them, Feldman heard these “refugees from liberal lifestyles” explain that the contemporary culture of promiscuity, and the opportunities that the marketplace provides to compete with men and other women left them feeling hollow, sullied, and estranged from their deepest longings — and that observant Judaism celebrates their roles as wives, mothers, and women in search of a way of life that makes even the routine of daily life an occasion for affirming the world’s holiness.

BY Force, or become excommunicated

By elaborating the logic of the Lubavticher life, Feldman aims to convince liberals of their obligation to tolerate “nonliberal” subgroups. In making her case, she is partly right and partly wrong. She is right that the Lubavitchers in America have every right to be tolerated, but she is wrong to downplay the irreducible tensions between the liberal life and the Lubavitcher life.

The Dragon of the Sanhedrin of the Talmud Bavli, by law now has rights to apostate "Amaraka" and they have elected to cast out Jesus the Christ, the final cut-off.

 Clash there is between the liberal life and the Lubavitcher life, but to grasp it properly one must go beyond Feldman’s framing of the issues. One must also understand the clash within the liberal life and the suppression of clash within the Lubavitcher life.

 

eldman grants the perfectionist liberals too much. The consensus that she takes as an authoritative representation of the liberal tradition, while a powerful persuasion within it, has gone astray. It has made an idol of autonomy. It threatens to sacrifice toleration on autonomy’s altar. And so it endangers the balance of competing principles critical to conserving our liberalism.

The "New republican Constitution" see protocols of the "Illuminated Masters of Chassidim, learned elders of zion

 

In fact, toleration and autonomy are kindred principles. Both grow out of respect for the equal rights of individuals, and both provide interpretations of how that respect should be put into practice. The principle of toleration maintains that individuals should be allowed to pursue their lives free of government supervision, provided that they respect the life, liberty, and possessions of others. The principle of autonomy affirms that individuals achieve their full potential in choosing for themselves how to conduct their lives, guided by no authority — meaning not only government authority but also that of parents, teachers, and custom and tradition — save their own critical intellect.

 

Whereas the principle of toleration concerns the limits of political authority, the principle of autonomy advances a moral ideal. The liberal spirit is drawn by both, but often in competing directions. The principle of toleration imposes limits on the regulation of belief and conduct beyond which the state may not pass. In contrast, the principle of autonomy, especially as progressively interpreted, provides the state with a justification for passing beyond those critical limits on the regulation of belief and conduct that the liberal tradition has solemnly warned the state to honor: limits that separate matters that pertain to the body from those that pertain to the soul, that distinguish harm to others from harm to oneself, that divide the public realm of politics from the private realm of family and religion.

 

Liberals who put the emphasis on toleration are willing to suffer within their midst individuals who worship other gods or no gods at all. But those who put autonomy first yearn to sanctify the freely choosing life as the only life worth living. They have learned too little from Rousseau, the French Revolution, and other more sinister forms of what Isaiah Berlin called “positive liberty,” and so they indulge the self-important delusion that they and the state have a moral obligation to force their fellow citizens to be free.

They must force "Amaraka" to embrace their Talmudic gods, the Dragon by force, here steps in the 102nd Congress of Blasphemy and treason and Heil Bushkevik of Dan the serpent by the way who will Judge his people via Noahide Universal unto his Dragon and the Beast Sanhedrin and the Beast Moshiach and his false Prophets

 

The tension between securing the conditions for toleration and promoting the life of autonomy runs throughout the modern liberal tradition; in On Liberty Mill provides a model for managing it. Mill certainly takes his stand in favor of the autonomous life and acknowledges its opposition to the traditional life: “The despotism of custom is everywhere the standing hindrance to human advancement, being in unceasing antagonism to that disposition to aim at something better than customary, which is called, according to circumstances, the spirit of liberty, or that of progress or improvement.” But, Mill stresses, the spirit of progress or improvement — by which he means progress in enlarging the number of individuals who pursue autonomy and improving their exercise of it — is not identical to the spirit of liberty, and they must not be conflated:
The spirit of improvement is not always a spirit of liberty, for it may aim at forcing improvements on an unwilling people; and the spirit of liberty, in so far as it resists such attempts, may ally itself locally and temporarily with the opponents of improvement; but the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centers of improvement as there are individuals. The progressive principle, however, in either shape, whether as the love of liberty or of improvement, is antagonistic to the sway of Custom, involving at least emancipation from that yoke; and the contest between the two constitutes the chief interest of the history of mankind.

They cloak this freedom wit the great deception of Noahide Demonicrazy, their snare of anti-Christ spirit

When push comes to shove, the spirit of improvement must yield to the spirit of liberty. Toleration takes precedence over autonomy, because you cannot respect individuals by forcing them to abandon strongly held beliefs and deeply entrenched practices.

 

But in this limitation Mill also finds progressive hope. The blessings of toleration, he suggests, are a constant enticement to the pursuit of autonomy and hasten the spread of its appeal. The liberal state exerts an ineluctable pull on its citizens and cannot help but shape their sensibilities and inform their morals. Its political institutions and laws, its public debates, and its popular culture loudly proclaim and subtly insinuate the moral ideal of the sovereign and self-aware individual.

 

In other words, it is one thing, as Mill envisaged, to create the political conditions under which individuals are free to undertake “new and original experiments in living.” It is quite another, as some of his more enthusiastic descendants would do, to assign government responsibility to root out religious faith, employ the resources of the state to rigorously train individuals to reject custom and tradition, and to legislate autonomy as the nation’s norm. Surely a free country has room for those who instead wish to serve God in accordance with their conscience and their tradition.

 

Actually, America also has an interest in welcoming the devoutly religious, and for the reason that Mill in the nineteenth century, as popular government and the liberal state were consolidating in England, welcomed personal eccentricity: because the devoutly religious embody a part of the truth that their absence would leave it more difficult for the rest of us to discern. Particularly in America, where democracy has triumphed and the liberal life is growing routinized, the devoutly religious remind us of the possibility of service to an authority higher than self. They teach about the costs of progress. They instruct about the variety of ways of being human.

they force us to embrace their gods of Babylon and their Dragon of Hell and death the coven-anent they have made

Neither tolerating nor learning from the Lubavtichers, however, requires the suspension of the operation of our critical faculties. To the contrary, we have every reason to notice that Torah study for them commonly departs from an ideal which they also recognize, instead confining students to repetitive study of Tanya (1796), the classic Chabad work of its founder Rabbi Schneur Zalman, and a narrow range of Lubavticher interpretations of sacred texts, cutting them off from the wider world of human learning, and constricting their sentiments and sense of what is possible and valuable as a human being. We have an obligation to observe that Lubavitcher spiritual leaders and basic beliefs have contributed to the creation of a cult-like reverence for the Lubavitcher rebbe, a reverence that passes well beyond respect for his achievements as a man and love for the spirit he embodied, and threatens to transform him into a fairy-tale wizard for the faithful and to induce a worship of him that borders on the idolatrous. And we have a duty to take account of the fact that the Lubavitcher life educates individuals, from the time they are boys and girls and throughout their lives as men and women, to feel ill at ease in each other’s presence, and thereby cultivates distance and distrust in every member of its faith community for half of humanity.

hahahhahaha this was their first move until these very same Hassidim Chabad Lubavitchers set up their Sanhedrin and have elected the seven of the ten

Dogmatism, fanaticism, and puritanical austerity will be a danger wherever religion is freely practiced. Nevertheless, a religious faith like that of the Lubavitchers — which, despite its foreign ways, is grounded in the biblical belief that all human beings are created in the image of God, and which teaches respect for basic rights and the laws of the land — offers common ground enough with liberalism for the Lubavitchers to respect liberal ways and for liberals to respect Lubavitcher ways.

and they are all one big family of the DRAGON and his beast

All that is necessary to understand this is a healthy skepticism about the moral ideal of autonomy, a generosity in the understanding of those whose beliefs about God differ from one’s own, and a toleration for those commands of conscience that do not violate other people’s rights. All that is necessary, in short, is a return to what is finest in the liberal tradition.

 Tolerance and acceptance of the DRAGON, THEIR god WHO IS NO GOD, OF THEIR FLESH WORLD

____

Shem wars of the Talmudic jews, the coming draft of the coming Moshiach ben satan

Dear Senator Frist, Senator Reid, Speaker Hastert, and Representative Pelosi:

The United States military is too small for the responsibilities we are asking it to assume. Those responsibilities are real and important. They are not going away. The United States will not and should not become less engaged in the world in the years to come. But our national security, global peace and stability, and the defense and promotion of freedom in the post-9/11 world require a larger military force than we have today. The administration has unfortunately resisted increasing our ground forces to the size needed to meet today’s (and tomorrow’s) missions and challenges.

So we write to ask you and your colleagues in the legislative branch to take the steps necessary to increase substantially the size of the active duty Army and Marine Corps. While estimates vary about just how large an increase is required, and Congress will make its own determination as to size and structure, it is our judgment that we should aim for an increase in the active duty Army and Marine Corps, together, of at least 25,000 troops each year over the next several years. There is abundant evidence that the demands of the ongoing missions in the greater Middle East, along with our continuing defense and alliance commitments elsewhere in the world, are close to exhausting current U.S. ground forces. For example, just late last month, Lieutenant General James Helmly, chief of the Army Reserve, reported that “overuse” in Iraq and Afghanistan could be
leading to a “broken force.” Yet after almost two years in Iraq and almost three years in Afghanistan, it should be evident that our engagement in the greater Middle East is truly, in Condoleezza Rice’s term, a “generational commitment.” The only way to fulfill the military aspect of this commitment is by increasing the size of the force available to our civilian leadership.

Eretz ISREALHELL Babylon PROPER

********************************

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution places the power and the duty to raise and support the military forces of the United States in the hands of the Congress. That is why we, the undersigned, a bipartisan group with diverse policy views, have come together to call upon you to act. You will be serving your country well if you insist on providing the military manpower we need to meet America’s obligations, and to help ensure success in carrying out our foreign policy objectives in a dangerous, but also hopeful, world.

Respectfully,
Peter Beinart - Jeffrey Bergner - Daniel Blumenthal - Max Boot - Eliot Cohen

Ivo H. Daalder - Thomas Donnelly - Michele Flournoy - Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

Reuel Marc Gerecht - Lt. Gen. Buster C. Glosson (USAF, retired) - Bruce P. Jackson

Frederick Kagan - Robert Kagan - Craig Kennedy - Paul Kennedy

Col. Robert Killebrew (USA, retired) - William Kristol - Will Marshall

Clifford May - Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey (USA, retired) - Daniel McKivergan

Joshua Muravchik - Steven J. Nider - Michael O’Hanlon

Mackubin Thomas Owens - Ralph Peters - Danielle Pletka - Stephen P. Rosen

Maj. Gen. Robert H. Scales (USA, retired) - Randy Scheunemann - Gary Schmitt

Walter Slocombe - James B. Steinberg

______

Thanks, Rowan Berkely

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9216.htm

Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid—Something Evil This Way is Coming!

By: Jack Dalton 

06/21/05 "ICH" - - George W. Bush stated in 1999 that he wanted to invade Iraq. He wanted to go down in history as a great American president. Last year during an interview with Tim Russert, Bush told the world that,
“I am a war president…I make all my decisions with war in mind…” For Bush, his road to immortality and greatness was, and still is, thru war; and not just one war, but continuous war. 

shemwars unto desolation

Bush and those around, beside and in back of him have articulated non-stop that they (he) are after permanent republican “rule” over this nation and us, the citizens of this nation. 

see the "New republican Constitution" Protocols of the Learned Elders of zion...the so called...hahahahahahaahahh forgeries.... The devil cries out while he is kicking you.

 

Apostate Amaraka, Just because you are anti-Christ cowards, does not make me wrong.

 

Virtually every government agency within the federal bureaucracy has as its head or director a BushCo loyalist. 

Talmudic Hassidim who Bush is Loyal, unto the DRAGON

Those that the U.S. Senate have been unwilling to give an up or down vote for, Bush has waited for a congressional recess and then just signed off on an “executive order” recess appointment, totally by-passing the “advice and consent” of the Senate. 

TREASON

Bush and company have stated many times and in no-uncertain of terms that they will be satisfied with nothing less than 100% approval for everything they want; and they will do whatever it takes to make sure of that. Lie, cheat, steal and hire pundits to read the BushCo script and try and pass it off as “news.” 

Today the fight goes on in the Senate over John Bolton, the BushCo proposed U.N. ambassador. Bolton will not get the senate vote, but no matter as the senate will recess this next week for the 4th of July and Bush will give Bolton a recess appointment by way of an “executive order” much as he has done in the past. There goes the U.N. which BushCo wants and needs. Other wise they run the risk of being prosecuted at some point in time by the international community for committing a war of aggression under the Nuremberg principals—which to date BushCo has not withdrawn from, at least not yet. 

That was what was behind all the “force protection” so-called “agreements” BushCo extorted so many to sign. At least they would sign if they still wanted U.S. dollars coming their way. So much for “agreements.” 

Noahide Enforcement bait, carrot on the stick unto the Dragon

This is all about power, pure unadulterated political power.

and the Dragon has given them their seat and their power

 Everything is secondary to securing permanent political power. The securing of this political power extends way past just the rest of the world. In order for BushCo to do that they must of necessity secure their power over us here in the U.S. first and foremost. 

TREASON and High Crimes and sorcery and Blasphemy of Apostate Judeo Amaraka

Virtually everything BushCo has done since 9/11 especially the “Patriot Act” has been to silence dissent and opposition to the plans of BushCo,
(Hassidic Chabad Lubavitch who control Washington DC and the Sanhedrin)
which simply stated is permanent one party “rule” (their word not mine) and the pushing of their “world view” and moralistic self-righteousness down our throats; 

Nassi Facism

and all while BushCo violates every international law, agreement and our own constitution. But, no matter as BushCo is rewriting that document on a daily basis. 

the "New republican Constitution of their head Nasi of the beast Sanhedrin and the SOS, : sons of the shemaGoG of satan

Now we have something else that BushCo wants to rewrite, or just do away with all together and the BushCo mouth pieces in the U.S. House of Representatives are right there to help—can anyone say, Tom DeLay & Co? 

They are out to repeal the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution—the two term limit on the presidency! The GOP has already announced it is out to “restructure the entire federal government” just last month. In fact they made this declaration just 2 weeks after the Downing Street Memo was released to the public. 

This cannot be allowed to happen! BushCo has already turned this nation on its head to the point I do not recognize my own country any more. BushCo lies its butt off about everything it does and has done the while the army of hired Karl Rove pundits tags all voices of opposition as liars, or un-American, or, traitors, or un-patriotic, or, or, or… Everyone lies but BushCo according to them, and half the country just quietly accepts that and joins in the choir of condemnation. 

because they are twice the children of hell and are become Judaized, and say their god is the gods of the jews, who say their gods have no only Begotten Son, thus this apostate Judeo-Churchinsanity have watered down the IAMHE and substituted HIM with a secondary lesser figure, a person in their image, and are anti-Christ in heart, though they say LORD LORD with their lying mouths, and they are damned and they shall perish in everlasting shame, for they are fearful and cowards and respecters of men's flesh.

I for one shall not go “…quietly into that good night…” I will resist this till I draw my last breath. If this, concerning the move to eliminate the two term limit to the presidency, does not motivate people to take immediate action I am afraid this nation truly is lost. For those of you that write this off as just another nut-job Vietnam vet screaming “the sky is falling” I have news for you—the sky is falling!! 

So while the members of BushCo attempt to divert our attention with false arguments—like the one they are trying to generate by falsely saying the Downing Street Memo is a forgery—they are quietly about the business of turning this nation into something it is not supposed to be—a
tyrannical dictatorship and they will succeed to a great extent if they manage to overturn the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution

Just keep in mind when you read the following that this is not old news—it is recent today history in the making—how it turns out is up to us. 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House) 

HJ 24 IH 

109th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. J. RES. 24

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. 


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 17, 2005 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr.
SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States,
which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification: Article --`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.'. 

The 22nd Amendment 

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term. 

Section. 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress. 

Jack Dalton is a disabled Vietnam veteran, activist and independent writer that lives in Portland, Or. He has a blog, Jack’s Straight Speak and is a columnist for the POAC as well as many other web publications.

It would be much easier if I were a dictator. George W. Bush

_____

 

e-mail sent to Sanhedrin 6-20-2005

your window is closing. Your vision shall fall.
 
your false king and his so called prophet will be cast into the pit, and death and hell are cast in with him.
 
All who dwell upon the earth who worship the Dragon who has given Sanhedrin her seat and authority will be cast into the pit.
 
All the kings of the earth who drink from the cup of the whores 'jerusalem"'s iniquity will be destroyed
 
For even as Enoch testified, the LORD Jesus comes with ten thousands of his saints your beast will slay by the Noahide Laws of your dragon.
 
Then the testimony is finished.
 
then what will you do, Dov?
 
REPENT, for there is ONE IAMHE, and he will judge your wretched soul, and damn you to eternal damnation, where there will be gnashing of teeth in outerdarkness. 

________

 

Hey George W. Bush and Chabad chassidim, anti Christ, and all the cowards in Washington DC,  and all you Judeo Mammonite proselytes of Hell, Chinese made dime store US Flag waving evangelical dragon worshippers so called Patriots,........... Let's Roll ! Because the saints of the Most High are "against you"

Every police officer, every sheriff's deputy, every city clerk, ever teacher in public education, every lawyer, every magistrate, every judge, every freemason noachidae, every Us representative, every federal judge, every apostate preacher,every useless lukewarm pew sitter,  every congressman/woman, every  elected official in these Unites States of America, who do not stand for the Lord Jesus the Christ, and UPHOLD the Christian laws which this Nation was founded, who instead worship strange gods and uphold laws which are not accorded by the people of the people and by the people, will be held accountable for your bloodlust and blasphemy and sorcery and ungodly unbelief, NOT ONE of you are exempt. DO you hear apostate "Amaraka" do you hear? 

For we fight a battle against one another into eternal Damnation of Eternal life. We who have put on the full armor of the LIVING Word will in no wise be destroyed, for OUR LORD is KING.

Sanhedrin, I warn you, you are defeated at Calvary from the foundation of the World.

You who are in Judea, DO you Hear?

__________

http://www.yiddishkeit.org/Default_YK.asp?

Conferences

 

Rabbi's Cohen and Jacobson from Chabad of Hunter

JULY 5 2005, 2PM.

"Universal values and human personality: the Noahide
Codes".

Congressional resolution of 1991: "Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded...[T]hese ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide laws".


Panel discussion at Hunter College 695 Park Ave, New York USA.

All welcome, refreshments served.

RSVP via email.

______

Their Judeo Churchinsanity proselyte murderous bloodlust of their father the murderer since the beginning. This is what their Judeo-Jaysooooooooooose would do.

The Arabs start wars and then start slobbering and crying like animals when they lose ground. The easiest and most effective way to deal with these slime is to put uranium and plutonium in their water supplies. Within ten years the variety of cancers in their populations would weaken them to the point of behaving.

Posted by: torsten stett at December 6, 2003 01:49 PM

_____

Sadly, if more attacks occur in the U.S., we may have to embark on a solution of genocide to rid the world of the Arab/Muslim menance. Sad, but true. The universe is probably full of examples of rogue races who could not "fit in" with the rest of the planet's societies, so.....they must be eliminated.

Posted by: Fred at December 7, 2003 11:54 AM

____

I would have no problem watching death squads exterminate any one who practices islam, and anyone of arabic blood. I would welcome the practice of bashing arab babies heads against walls to save bullets. The extermination of this hideous religion is the only answer to this problem. Support genocide!

Posted by: Death at December 8, 2003 02:55 PM

____

The Klan will not allow the alien infection of arabs to continue any longer! We will exterminate all of them and put them into melting pots and make a new crayon color: Dark Arab Asshole! Seig Heil!

Posted by: Suzanne Somers at January 9, 2004 05:06 PM

_____

Kill The Arabs...Kill 'em All.

Somebody recently asked me: "What is a 'neocon?'" My response: "A formerly liberal, fair-weather-US-flag-waving Zionist - or one in thrall to Zionism."

That led to my definition of Zionist: "A Jewish supremacist, particularly one with an ironically Nazi-esque flair."

In fairness, the Zionist label wasn't entirely correct, since America's agenda now has come so closely to resemble that of Israel's - in effect, if not strictly aligned with the intent of the Chosen Ones, that is. You know, kill the Arabs...kill 'em all.
Sort of like modern-day Canaanites

_____

Reports are starting to come in from everywhere about racist attacks happening in the US. Again, I urge anyone that has any information even from their local mainstream new, about such attacks, send them to maximumrnr@mindspring.com. Dozens of racially motivated attacks are happening around the US. Charles Maggio said that in Hoboken people were driving around with "Kill All Arabs" written on the side of their trucks.

_____

Chicago, IL: Teens Use Videos to Combat Racism
In the weeks following the September 11th attacks, the Chicago area experienced a surge of anti Arab-American violence. A Molotov cocktail was thrown through the Arab Educational  School, and Muslim and Arab American institutions received numerous threatening calls. About 500 to 700 demonstrators gathered near a high school, and several people chanted "Kill the Arabs."

_____

Ought we to feel guilty for helping the Israelis kill the Arabs? Notice how terrible I just made Israel sound, but anyone with any knowledge at all realizes that it's not quite that simple. They don't just "kill," them, they do it to protect themselves, for the most part.

______

Gawd bliss "amaraka" the land of the New Judeo-Jaysoose murderers of the bloodlust of the Dragon

_______

http://www.kazakhembus.com/090904.html

President Nazarbayev Helps Dedicate Synagogue, Calls on

World to Follow Kazakhstan’s Example of Religious Peace


President Nursultan Nazarbayev called on the people of the world to follow his country’s example of preserving interethnic and inter-religious harmony as he helped to dedicate the largest synagogue in Central Asia in Kazakhstan’s capital city of Astana on September 7.

At the ceremony dedicating the synagogue, he said: “Recently, an Islamic cultural center was built on the capital’s left bank; a Russian Orthodox church and a Roman Catholic cathedral have also opened their doors. Today, the followers of Judaism have their own house of worship.”

The President continued: “After the visit of Pope John Paul II [in 2001] and the first Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions [in 2003] Astana can rightfully claim to be the spiritual center of Eurasia.”

President Nazarbayev believes Kazakhstan has something to offer to the World: “Today Kazakhstan is able to develop precisely due to hard work, mutual trust and friendship of people of 130 ethnic groups and 45 religions. If all of the world follows the example of the peoples of Kazakhstan, peace and calm will reign on the planet… let it be so!”
Noahide Kazakhstan
As he helped dedicate the synagogue,
the President was joined by the Chief
Rabbi of Israel, Yona Metzger, Muslim
and Jewish clergy from Kazakhstan,
Israel, Russia, Ukraine, as well as
Alexander Mashkevich, President of
the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress and
the Jewish Congress of Kazakhstan.

The construction of the synagogue,
named “Beit Rachel – Chabad Lubavitch
in memory of Mr. Machkevich’s mother,
was financed by the Euro-Asian Jewish
Congress based in Almaty.

There is an American connection at Beit
Rachel. Representative Robert Wexler, a
Democratic member of the U.S. Congress
from Florida who is Jewish, laid its
cornerstone on a visit to Astana in 2002.
Ronald Lauder, founder and president of
The Ronald S. Lauder Foundation, which
supports Jewish communities in Eastern
Europe, came from New York for the
dedication.

Speaking at the ceremony, Rabbi Metzger
thanked all those who made the synagogue
possible and remarked that it had been a
long time since a new synagogue opened
its doors in a country that is predominantly
Muslim. Along with other Rabbis, he
presented President Nazarbayev with a
Menorah. Representatives of Jewish
organizations from 60 cities across
Kazakhstan also took part in the
dedication.

Earlier that day, Rabbi Metzger and Mr.
Mashkevich also presented President
Nazarbayev with the International Maimonidis Prize. Mr. Mashkevich believes the world at this perilous time, needs to see the example of a leader who would find ways to ensure conflict-free coexistence of all peoples and all religions: “This outstanding prize is [therefore] awarded to an outstanding man, the President of Kazakhstan.”

An important part of the ceremony at the synagogue, which will also serve as a Jewish community center, was the presentation of a Torah scroll written in Israel specially for this synagogue. Its last words were inscribed by honored members of Kazakhstan’s Jewish community and Rabbis from abroad. Two more scrolls were handed over to the new synagogue as presents from the Jewish community of Ukraine, and a message was delivered from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.

The dedication closed with a special prayer to accompany the arrival of the Torah scrolls, followed by a joyful dance with the Torah scrolls.

Beit Rachel’s site covers 5,600 square meters (60,000 square feet). The tip of the Star of David is 25 meters (75 feet) above ground.

The Jewish Center of Kazakhstan "Chabad Lubavitch", in a press release said: “The opening of the synagogue in the state capital provides a shining example of the policy of tolerance to religious beliefs and clearly demonstrates the sincere aspiration of Kazakhstan’s leadership for peace and accord between nations.”

There are many thousands of Jews in Kazakhstan who, along with Muslims, Christians, and others, experienced a remarkable religious revival since Kazakhstan became independent in 1991.
 

One big happy Chabad Lubavitch family of the Dragon

_____

KAZAKHSTAN'S JEWS CELEBRATE
          
          On August 10, 2001, National Conference of Soviet Jewry reported that the Jewish community of Kazakhstan celebrated the fifth anniversary of the stone-laying for a future synagogue, and the remembrance day (yahrzeit) of Rabbi Levi Yitzhak Schneerson, the father of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, the late Menachem Mendel Schneerson.
          "They came to a synagogue in the largest Kazakh city and they brought their children with them, even the smallest ones," said Juda Kubalkin, Chief Rabbi of the capital Astana. "The Jews of Kazakhstan are not afraid anymore that they will lose jobs for observing Sabbath or will be jailed for reading the Torah."  The celebration was attended by the Jewish community, as well as diplomats and government officials.
          Rabbi Levi Yitzchak, a prominent rabbi who lived and died in Kazakhstan, was an outspoken critic and target of the Soviet regime.  His grave, left unmarked during the Soviet era, is today a major pilgrimage site for Jews from around the world. 
          "The Jewish community became one of the most active in Kazakhstan", said Daniel Russell, the Charge d'Affaires of the U.S. Embassy.  Yeshaya Cohen, Chief Rabbi of Kazakhstan, noted, "Could we even imagine in the past that we would be able to celebrate our holidays and to come to the synagogue freely? But this time has come."

_________

Noahide News Part 217

 

 

 

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II

"Questions"

"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

 ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees

Exod-U.S the coming Geula 

anti-semitism?

Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

Noahide News Part 3

Noahide News Part 4

Noahide News Part 5

Noahide News Part 6

Noahide News Part 7

Noahide News Part 8

Noahide News Part 9

Noahide News Part 10

Noahide News Part 11

Noahide News Part 12

Noahide News Part 13

Noahide News Part 14

Noahide News Part 15

Noahide News Part 16

Noahide News Part 17

Noahide News Part 18

Noahide News Part 19

Noahide News Part 20

Noahide News Part 21

Noahide News part 22

Noahide News Part 23

Noahide News part 24

Noahide News Part 25

Noahide News Part 26

Noahide News part 27

Noahide News Part 28

Noahide News Part 29

Noahide News Part 30

Noahide News Part 31

Noahide News Part 32

Noahide News Part 33

Noahide News Part 34

Noahide News Part 35

Noahide News Part 36

Noahide News Part 37

Noahide News Part 38

Noahide News Part 39

Noahide News Part 40

Noahide News Part 41

Noahide News Part 42

Noahide News Part 43

Noahide News Part 44

Noahide News Part 45

Noahide News Part 46

Noahide News Part 47

Noahide News Part 48

Noahide News Part 49

Noahide News Part 50

Noahide News Part 51

Noahide News Part 52

Noahide News Part 53

Noahide News Part 54

Noahide News Part 55

Noahide NewsPart 56

Noahide News Part 57

Noahide News Part 58

Noahide News Part 59

Noahide News Part 60

Noahide News Part 61

Noahide News Part 62

Noahide News Part 63

Noahide News Part 64 

Noahide News Part 65

Noahide News Part 66

Noahide News Part 67

Noahide News Part 68

Noahide News Part 69

Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist

Noahide News Part 70

Noahide News Part 71

Noahide News Part 72

Noahide News Part 73

Noahide News Part 74

Noahide News Part 75

Noahide News Part 76

Noahide News Part 77

Noahide News Part 78

Noahide News Part 79

Noahide News Part 80

Noahide News Part 81

Noahide News Part 82

Noahide News Part 83 ALERT ALERT ALERT

Noahide News Part 84

Noahide News Part 85

Noahide News Part 86

Noahide News Part 87

Noahide News Part 88

Noahide News Part 89

Noahide News part 90

Noahide News Part 91

Noahide News Part 92

Noahide News Part 93

Noahide News Part 94

Noahide News Part 95

Noahide News Part 96

Noahide News Part 97

Noahide News Part 98

Noahide News Part 99

Noahide News Part 100

Noahide News Part 101

Noahide News Part 102

Noahide News Part 103

Noahide News Part 104

Noahide News Part 105

Noahide News Part 106

Noahide News Part 107

Noahide News Part 108

Noahide News Part 109

Noahide News Part 110

Noahide News Part 111

Noahide News Part 112

Noahide News Part 113

Noahide News Part 114

Noahide Naws Part 115

Noahide News Part 116

Noahide News Part 117

Noahide News Part 118

Noahide News Part 119

Noahide News Part 120

Noahide News Part 121

Noahide News Part 122

Noahide News Part 123

Noahide News Part 124

Noahide News part 125

Noahide News Part 126

Noahide News Part 127

Noahide News Part 128

Noahide News Part 129

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News Part 130

Noahide news Part 131

Noahide News Part 132

Noahide News Part 133

Noahide News Part 134

Noahide News Part 135

Noahide news Part 136

Noahide News Part 137

Noahide News Part 138

Noahide News Part 139

Noahide News Part 140

Noahide News Part 141

Noahide News Part 142

Noahide News Part 143

Noahide News Part 144  

Noahide news Part 147

Noahide News Part 148

Noahide News Part 149

Noahide News Part 150

Noahide News Part 151

Noahide News Part 152

Noahide News Part 153

Noahide News Part 154

NoahideNews Part 155

Noahide News Part 156

Noahide News Part 157

Noahide News Part 158

Noahide News Part 159

Noahide News Part 160

Noahide News Part 161

Noahide News Part 162

Noahide News Part 163

Noahide News Part 164

Noahide News Part 165

Noahide News part 166

Noahide News Part 167

Noahide News Part 168

Noahide News Part 169

Noahide News Part 170

Noahide News Part 171

Noahide News Part 172

Noahide News Part 173

Noahide News Part 174

Noahide News Part 175

Noahide News Part 176

Noahide News Part 177

Noahide News Part 178

Noahide News Part 179

Noahide News Part 180

Noahide News Part 181

Noahide News Part 182

Noahide News Part 183

Noahide News Part 184

Noahide News Part 185

Noahide News part 186

Noahide News Part 187

Noahide News Part 188

Noahide News Part 189

Noahide News Part 190 Alert ! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 191

Noahide News part 192

Noahide News Part 193

Noahide News Part 194

Noahide News Part 195

Noahide News Part 196

Noahide News Part 197

Noahide News part 198

Noahide News Part 199

Noahide News Part 200

Noahide News Part 201

Noahide News Part 202

Noahide News Part 203Alert Alert Alert !

Noahide News Part 204 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 205

Noahide news Part 206

Noahide News Part 207

Noahide News Part 208

Noahide News Part 209

Noahide News Part 210

Noahide News Part 211

Noahide News Part 212

Noahide News Part 213

Noahide News Part 214

Noahide News Part 215

Noahide News Part 216

Noahide News Part 217