Rebbe Nachman of Breslev teaches that we must constantly search for
the Divine message in all the events of our lives, since Hashem speaks
to us by way of our environment.
At the time of this writing, hurricane Katrina
has been declared a national emergency in the USA; her winds now
exceed 175 mph (nearly 300 km/hour). She's a mere one hundred miles
from the US coast, and approaching at a foreboding 13 miles per hour.
Authorities in Louisiana have ordered hundreds of thousands of people
to flee from their homes.
Fleeing from Katrina, New Orleans, Sunday afternoon
Katrina is hitting just as the bulldozers are completing the
destruction of Gush Katif. The Talmud teaches
that Hashem administers the world according to the "ATFAT"
principle, in other words, "a turn for a turn" (for
an elaboration of the ATFAT principle, see Chapter Six of The
Trail to Tranquility). My heart tells me that there's a link
between the forced expulsion of 8500 people from their blood, sweat,
and tear-soaked homes in Israeli Gaza and between the nearly 850,000
people who are forced to flee from their homes in Louisiana.
HIS Black heart of sorcery unto his dragon god who is
no GOD, but their "REPLACEMENT gods of Phariseeism of Sanhedrin of the
Dragon who gave them their power, who God the father, has put it into their
hearts to DO HIS WILL. DO not let ISREALHELL be your stumbling block, for
now all the world is drunken with the cup of the whore' INIQUITY
Sharon, at the prodding of the American government, has destroyed
hallowed centers of prayer, Torah learning, and settlement in the Land of
(The Dragon who is not the name above Everyname, Jesus
wasting much time in showing His wrath. In fact, Katrina has chosen Ms.
Rice's home state as a target; I humbly believe that the unfortunate people
of Louisiana can blame Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice for their misfortune. This is a
classic ATFAT situation: He who creates exiles in the Holy Land, will have a
hundred-fold exiles in his own land.
A bizarre turn of events - for weeks, the media
was savoring over the confrontations between Jewish settlers and Jewish
soldiers; now, similar pictures are pouring over the wire from New Orleans.
In the above photo, courtesy of Reuters, a National Guardsman holds back
people seeking refuge in the Louisiana Superdome, Sunday afternoon.A
coincidence? I don't believe in coincidences.
Katrina, written קטרינה in Hebrew,
has a numerical equivalent of 374. Two relevant passages in Torah share the
exact numerical equivalent of 374 also: רעה
גמלוך, or "They have done you evil"
(see Gen. 50:17), and ים ביבשה, or
"The sea upon land" (see Exodus 14:15). The former passage may be
an indication as to the spiritual cause of Katrina, while the latter passage
describes the physical manifestation.
And now these who say
they are jews but are Liars and are of the shema_GOG of satan will turn upon
the seed of Abraham, the Spiritual ISRAEL of the GOD of ISRAEL, JESUS who by
faith in HIM are heirs to HIS Promise, then the Wrath of that CREATOR GOD
will soon be poured upon the earth. Still waiting for your peace treaty Hal
Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice, I implore you to repent, to ask Hashem's
forgiveness for destroying a flourishing part of Israel. Cancel all your
demands for further territorial concessions in Israel.
If by your initiative more Jews are rendered homeless, G-d forbid, I shudder
to think of what could happen. Please take Katrina very seriously,
for she is a no-nonsense messenger from The Almighty.
INdeed she is, do you hear Massah Lazer?
Sofiet Talmudic Shemborg Collective from the North, NOW are surrounding the
Camp of the saints of the TRUE ISRAEL from the beginning. The Camp who knew
of the REDEEMER and the Camp who when the REDEEMER came, BELIEVED, the same
Camp from the foundation of the WORLD sent to TESTIFY and Stand Firm.
all about them, and not a single Goyim
New Orleans firefighters carry their hose through floodwaters as they
attempt to extinguish a fire (REUTERS/Jason Reed)
Establishes Hurricane Relief Fund
LUBAVITCH HEADQUARTERS, NY — Wednesday, August 31,
ubavitch World Headquarters announced
that it has established a disaster relief fund to aid victims of Hurricane
The Chabad Disaster Relief Fund will accept contributions “earmarked for
relief aid for victims of Katrina and to the rebuilding
of the Jewish community facilities destroyed by the hurricane,” said
Rabbi Yehuda Krinsky, chairman of the agencies in charge of the
Chabad-Lubavitch representatives worldwide.
As Chabad representatives of all the affected states coordinate with Chabad
Houses in cities where evacuees are temporarily being housed, helping them
find food and lodging, they anticipate a severe crisis in the aftermath of the
“We are going to see tremendous dislocation. We’ll have to put something
in place to provide housing, furniture and clothing for so many who will face
the loss of their homes and businesses and all their belongings,” Rabbi
Zelig Rivkin, Chabad representative to Louisiana (headquartered in New
Orleans) told lubavitch.com. Rabbi Rivkin was reached by phone at the
Chabad House in Houston, Texas, to where he and his
family were evacuated after remaining in New Orleans to help community members
until the 11th hour.
Rabbi Krinsky expressed gratitude to all those who have called with offers of
assistance. “We are grateful for all the calls of concern and support, and
we appeal to everyone in the larger Jewish community to contribute to the
Chabad Disaster Relief Fund to alleviate in some measure, the awful
earmarked “Katrina” can be made online Katrina
Relief Fund or by mail, payable to: Jewish Hurricane Relief Fund,
770 Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, NY ll2l3
their little shemborg Sofiet Communitarian collective of wannabe gods
38: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Double Cross to the WORLD, Noahide Enslavement, the only freedom is Jesus the
Christ the TRUTH
Upon seizing the reins of
government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full
agenda of reform. ... Full support will be given to Israeli forces
to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where
necessary. Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over
Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the
authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts
will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will
be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha.... .... And law and
order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security
measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory
W. Bush " said: "I am not looking forward to this
trip. It's as if the entire Gulf coast were obliterated
by the worst kind of weapon you can imagine."
GULAG, the roundup of the Lord's saints to follow. The TREASONOUS BREACH of
They promote the Racial
wars of shem's sham of shame. Those who are in Jesus the Christ are ONE FOLD,
ONE Blood, One Nation of his Chosen
September 02, 2005
Troops begin combat
operations in New Orleans
Times staff writer
NEW ORLEANS — Combat
operations are underway on the streets “to take this city
back” in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
place is going to look like Little Somalia,”
Brig. Gen. Gary Jones, commander of the Louisiana National Guard’s Joint
Task Force told Army Times Friday as hundreds of armed troops under his
charge prepared to launch a massive citywide security mission from a staging
area outside the Louisiana Superdome. “We’re going to go out and take
this city back. This
will be a combat operation to get this city under control.”
Jones said the
military first needs to establish security throughout the city. Military and
police officials have said there are several large areas of the city are in
a full state of anarchy.
Dozens of military
trucks and up-armored Humvees left the staging area just after 11 a.m.
Friday, while hundreds more troops arrived at the same staging area in the
city via Black Hawk and Chinook helicopters.
“We’re here to do
whatever they need us to do,” Sgt. 1st Class Ron Dixon, of the Oklahoma
National Guard’s 1345th Transportation Company. “We packed to stay as
long as it takes.”
While some fight the insurgency
in the city, other carry on with rescue and evacuation operations.
Helicopters are still pulling hundreds of stranded people from rooftops of
Army, Air Force,
Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard and police helicopters filled the city sky
Friday morning. Most had armed soldiers manning the doors. According to
Petty Officer 3rd Class Jeremy Grishamn, a spokesman for the amphibious
assault ship Bataan, the vessel kept its helicopters at sea Thursday night
after several military helicopters reported
being shot at from the ground.
also told Army Times that they have been shot at by armed civilians in New
Orleans. Spokesmen for the Joint Task Force Headquarters at the Superdome
were unaware of any servicemen being wounded in the streets, although one
soldier is recovering from a gunshot wound sustained during a struggle with
a civilian in the dome Wednesday night.
“I never thought
that at a National Guardsman I would be shot at by
other Americans,” said Spc. Philip Baccus of the 527th Engineer
Battalion. “And I never thought I’d have to
carry a rifle when on a hurricane relief mission. This is a disgrace.”
Spc. Cliff Ferguson
of the 527th Engineer Battalion pointed out that he knows there are plenty
of decent people in New Orleans, but he said it is hard to stay motivated
considering the circumstances.
“This is making a
lot of us think about not reenlisting.” Ferguson said. “You have to
think about whether it is worth risking your neck for someone who will turn
around and shoot at you.
We didn’t come here to
fight a war. We came here to help.”
DO not be deceived Amaraka
they are propagating Justification for Military rule of Jackbooted thugs who
have no problem with KILLING Americans. DO YOU HEAR? They have long planned
URBAN Warfare against your cities. This will spark civil riots nationwide to
bring in their Hoodlum haha of their Hassidic Noahide Rule.
West Rips Bush During NBC Concert
Sep 3, 6:08 AM (ET)
By FRAZIER MOORE
NEW YORK (AP) - It began, fittingly enough, with jazz from New Orleans
natives Harry Connick Jr. and Wynton Marsalis. But "A Concert for
Hurricane Relief," a heartfelt and dignified benefit aired on NBC and
other networks Friday night, took an unexpected turn thanks to the outspoken
rapper Kanye West.
Appearing two-thirds through the program, he claimed "George
Bush doesn't care about black people" and said America is set up
"to help the poor, the black people, the less well-off as slow as
The show, simulcast from New York on NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and Pax, was aired
live to the East Coast, enabling the Grammy-winning rapper's outburst to go
Admitting censorship is rampant by the
MEDIA of the Talmudic Illuminated Hassidim
There was a several-second tape delay, but the person in charge "was
instructed to listen for a curse word, and didn't realize (West) had gone
off-script," said NBC spokeswoman Rebecca Marks.
West's comment about the president was
cut from NBC's West Coast airing, which showed three hours later on tape.
While allowing that "the Red Cross is doing everything they
can," West - who delivered an emotional outburst at the American Music
Awards after he was snubbed for an award - declared that government
authorities are intentionally dragging their feet on aid to the Gulf Coast.
Without getting specific, he added, "They've
given them permission to go down and shoot us."
After he stated, "George Bush doesn't care about black people,"
the camera cut away to comedian Chris Tucker.
Then the entire ensemble performed
"When the Saints Go Marching In."
- Ashamed To Be
By Ted Lang ©2004-2005
All Rights Reserved
- As we reflected in horror and with a great sadness brought
on by a haunting nostalgic emptiness with the realization of the passing of
our once-great nation, signified by a new threshold of unprecedented
"terrorist attacks upon the US mainland on September 11, 2001, we were
inspired by Lee Greenwood's now famous ode, "God Bless the USA. Its key
point: we should accept defeat, pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and
get back in the race; after all, we are Americans and should be proud that
we enjoy the greatest freedoms in all humanity.
- That hype might have worked for Americans back then, myself
included; but as some of US began to question and to analyze, we arrived at
irrefutable conclusions based on astonishingly strong circumstantial
evidence. The Bush regime's odd behavior and its lightning scrambles to
remove, hide, and cover up such evidence served to firmly back up suspicions
of a series of deliberate, conspiratorial, arrangements that seem to have
been perpetrated by Bush's neoconservative (Talmudic
- Everything that could possibly have been said and written
concerning the hurricane disaster just visited upon Louisiana and
Mississippi already has been. It is beyond my poor power to add or detract.
The miserable failings, once again, of the Bush administration, of the
Congress, of FEMA, of the Corps of Engineers, and "the State in
general, have been aired. No further purpose is served in discovering new
creative political attacks to further criticize Bush and America's
incompetent government organizations and bureaucracies.
- People deserve the government they want, and most in
America have supported this low class, incompetent, disastrous and secret
cabal government that has brought US down.
- Republican Paul Craig Roberts says it best:
- "The Bush administration is damned by its gross
incompetence. Bush has squandered the lives and health of thousands of
people. He has run through hundreds of billions of borrowed dollars. He has
lost America's reputation and its allies. With barbaric torture and
destruction of our civil liberty, he has stripped America of its inherent
goodness and morality. And now Bush has lost America's largest port and 25
percent of its oil supply. Why? Because Bush started a gratuitous war egged
on by a claque of crazy neoconservatives who have
sacrificed America's interests to their insane agenda.
- Are these the things Americans should be proud of? Hardly!
And NO! I am NOT proud to be an American - not any longer!
If spineless, gutless, immoral and ignorant American sheeple cannot see the
error of our now-Big Brother Government, they deserve a 9-11 and a New
Orleans disaster on a daily basis! If they cannot or will not
awaken from their stupor, than perhaps God and Bush will wipe US of the face
the earth! 21st century Pearl Harbor, huh? What is needed is to rid the
world of its 21st century political dinosaurs - Americans!
- Imagine dead bodies in wheel chairs and rotting in the
intense heat under decaying blankets. Is this a concept of America that
generates envy, or the world's pity and contempt? Imagine day old babies
dying and lying on the ground without an appropriate burial! Imagine the
dead floating in the street while Bush and his secret cabal withhold aid for
five days to teach America dependency on government. Hey
America, aren't you pleased?! So what the hell is there to be proud of?
- Although Joe Farah
- of WorldNetDaily is loath to be identified with any
particular party, his conservative tendencies align him with Bush and
- And Pat Buchanan
- aligns the same way, considering he once was on the
Republican ticket campaigning for president. And Roberts served as an
assistant secretary of the Treasury under Republican President Ronald
Reagan. And I,ve been a Republican since 1964 and voted for Bush in 2000
hoping he would help US recover from the error of big Clinton government.
I,m proud I didn't vote for Bush in 2004. In fact, of all the
"Republicans just cited, it is I who first suggested our nation should
impeach Bush over two years ago
- How's that for punditry and vision?
- Never before has the nation-cleansing act of impeachment
been more important - it has now become mandatory to save our nation. But
now it must be accomplished concurrent with the total and immediate
withdrawal of our troops in Iraq. Of course, it is already far too late for
New Orleans, Louisiana, Biloxi and Mississippi.
- Impeachment and the Iraqi withdrawal are now
desperately needed to prevent the very next disaster, which will be coming
- Although Paul Williams is apparently clueless as to Dick
Cheney's plan to nuke Iran in retaliation for an arranged nuclear hit on a
southern city on the order of the same inside job executed with the
precision demonstrated by the Bush regime on September 11, 2001, abstinence
from such a repeat "drill by the Bush War
Crime family will not "be an option on the table. These
lunatics know no bounds. All it will take is this
arranged nuclear hit, and Bush's dictatorship for life and the destruction
of all America will be assured. That is the significance of Katrina.
- The Bush regime simply refused to provide any modicum of
relief to the hurricane victims for five full days. That's
all that needs to be known to reveal the hatred and contempt Bush and his
regime have for the American people. It proves they don't give a
damn about the "collateral damage either here or in Iraq. These
cold-blooded despicable bastards are indeed capable of unleashing yet
another 9-11, and this time a nuclear one.
- And no, God will NOT bless America. He will probably be
real glad we,re finally off His radar screen.
- Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.
is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide
laws, and if not -they will be killed." Rabbi Yitzhak
for violating any of the Seven Noahide
Laws is a capital punishment by DECAPITATION. (pg.1192 of the Encyclopedia
And On their
DRAFT: Due to Appear in
the Georgetown Immigration Law Journal
Particularism: The Noahide
Laws, Citizenship, and Alienage1
Gruss Scholar in
Residence, NYU School of Law
3701 Henry Hudson Pkwy,
Bronx, NY 10463
998-6566, H:(718) 549-9124
inherent tension between emphasizing the value of citizenship and extending a
kind hand to aliens has come to the fore in recent scholarly literature.
Offering rights too easily to non-citizens minimizes the value of citizenship
itself, a problem for those who wish to promote strong identification with one's
Bushitlers open Border Progromme
The overriding desire to help aliens,
many if not most of whom inhabit difficult lives in the lower socioeconomic
classes of society, spurs others to argue for expanding the rights of lawful
permanent residents (LPR's), even to where they are indistinguishable from those
given to citizens.3
SEE NEW ORLEANS,
submission to their Noahide Authority of their dragon the Devil
the debate is a disagreement about the purpose and value of citizenship,
especially when it is counterpoised to the sticky questions of when or whether
it is proper to discriminate against or deny benefits to people based on their
lack of membership in a certain club. This article suggests reasons why,
and a model for how, to distinguish between citizens and lawful permanent
shabbos goyim of
jewrisdiction ISREALHELL USA
do so by extrapolating from a system that articulated the two categories fairly
While Jews were bound by the commandments of the Torah,
envisioned another set of laws,
known as the laws of the sons of Noah or Noahide
law,4 which applied to all non-Jews.1 While it applies to all human
beings, Noahide law also
as a kind of
in that the Talmud required non-Jews to agree to adhere
to Noahide laws and standards in order
to be allowed to live in a Jewish commonwealth.5 That was
already only a theoretical possibility for the rabbis of the Talmud and ever
since, but studying their expectations of resident aliens sheds light on how
one group of
balanced a keen interest in a strong sense of citizenship with a reasonable and
fair-minded treatment of outsiders who came to reside among them.
will see that even at their most universal,
Jews were remarkably
particularistic in their expectations of non-Jews.2
Resident aliens in a Jewish polity were required to
accept fairly specific and fundamental aspects of the Jewish worldview; once
they did so, they were welcomed into Jewish society. Since,
however, they did not fully attach themselves to the Jewish way of life, they
also only received some of the benefits of citizenship.
particularism of the Noahide
laws, we will argue, is simply an example of the
necessary particularism of all legal systems, which always implicitly
espouse a particular worldview in the details of their
laws. Citizens are those members of a
society who accept that way of looking at the world, of how society
should work, of how citizens need to treat each other and outsiders, and of the
proper ways to work for change and improvement within that society.
Or be decapitated
Those who wish to fully join in
the endeavor of
prosperity of that society and worldview will become citizens;
those who sympathize with essential aspects of the society but choose not to
join it fully cannot then expect the full benefits of
the system that they have chosen not to join.6 Those who refuse
to identify with the society's goals and values in even a limited way should not
expect the right of permanent residence, and perhaps
not even residence at all.
idea of using Jewish law to reflect on American is not new, but has been
cogently critiqued by Suzanne Last Stone.7
Responding to a trend started
by the late Robert Cover and followed by others,8 Stone argued that such
analyses often neglect features of Jewish law that make it less salient than
it might seem. Specifically, she saw the centrality of divine
authority in Jewish law--Judaism's insistence that
adherence to the law be grounded in the belief that God commanded it-
the non god of Talmudic Judaism, the DRAGON that
making this system too different from secular law
to provide useful comparison.9
Models of Applying One Legal System to Another
obliquely raises the question of how one system, with its particularistic
assumptions and worldview, can offer meaningful insight for another, a
question we obviously must address before embarking on our endeavor in
comparative alienage. Granting Professor Stone's point that systems of
law are often so different as to prevent importing elements from one to
another, we can still envision three circumstances where transfer is
plausible and appropriate.
claims of one system may appeal to the members of the other because they are
convincing within the second group's own ways of looking at the world.
Theoretically, all or most Americans might decide that the Jewish (or Moslem
or Russian or French) view of marriage, or self-defense, or contracts, made
sense in an American context as well, and adjust their laws to incorporate
stress the importance of naturalizing the
innovation into the host context because I do not want to be
misunderstood as arguing in favor of allowing outside
systems to shape that of the United States. To claim that
the United States should act in a certain way because God commanded x (or
whatever justifies that law for the external system) is to speak gibberish
in the context of the public debate of the United States. For a
mixture of reasons political and principled, this country has long rejected
the authority of any but the most general religious framework in structuring
the country's laws and institutions.
JESUS the Christ the Creator
Private belief is a matter
of personal conscience, but to be heard in the public arena requires
phrasing oneself in terms that stand independently of any particular
destruction to usher in shemborg Dragoniac rule
given the restrictions just posited, there will still be circumstances that
allow for the reasonable claim that the United States should adopt another
legal system's view of a topic.
Treason and Blasphemy
grant that American values and ideals must remain the frame of
reference, we can easily imagine occasions where other systems' handling of
some national concern seems more effective than current American practice,
in a way that does not diverge from any American values or ideals. In
such situations, we could feel free to adopt that practice in toto.
that kind of cutting and pasting of law from one system to another is
inappropriate, a second kind of transference would be to
the categories of one system to the other, with the details differing from
system to system. Nation building
provides a good example, since the nation overseeing the building tries to
apply broad categories--democracy,
tolerance, pluralism-- while recognizing that they may be expressed in a
vastly different manner than in the original country.10 The resulting
laws reflect the home country, but their underlying categories come from
the overseeing nation.
see Iraq Noahide
SEE HJR 104, PL
102-14 US Congress 1991, 102nd Congress
least intrusive model, the one that best fits our current discussion, argues
only for applying the broad themes of one legal system to another. If
a religious law insisted that its members pray a certain number of times a
day, a thematic application of that law could be to recognize its underlying
assumption that repeated recitations of formulae help people deepen their
connection to core values. Picking up on the theme, although not its
content, a secular legal system might decide to institute some kind of
ritualized recitation, such as the Pledge of
Allegiance or the National Anthem, to help its citizens retain their sense
of connection to the goals of the larger society.
techniques of Talmudic sorcery
will here suggest that that
last kind of transference would be helpful in shaping the American discourse
about citizenship and alienage.
In order to do so, however, we need to unravel the tangle of claims that
Judaism made about Noahide
discussions of Noahide
law saw it as a form of natural law, where natural was used as a
synonym for intuitive, or a law aimed at developing a minimal political
See Judge ROY Moore's Freemason satanic ruse and
his Judeo-Churchinsanity Ten commandment "Natural Law" monument
We will show that despite some
indications that Jews thought of Noahide
law as rational and minimal, the system actually required non-Jews to
understand and accept fundamental aspects of the Jewish worldview before
they could reside in a Jewish commonwealth.
1991 and the
apostate Nation of Amaraka, have accepted the system of the anti-Christ
beast in total submission
listed in the Talmud, non-Jews must establish a court system,3 are
prohibited from committing blasphemy (cursing the Name of God), idolatry,
incest, murder, theft, and eating part of an animal that was removed before
the animal died. The details of those general requirements show that
these laws were meant to inculcate a fairly Jewish view of four central
topics: God, society, sexuality, and food.
academic discussions of the Noahide
laws have tended to ignore or fail to recognize its particularism.
Hugo Grotius, one of the earliest non-Jewish writers to speak of Noahide
law, characterized it as a Jewish version of ius
gentium, the term used for Roman laws governing relationships
between Romans and non-Romans.11 Part of that characterization is the
recognition that these laws evinced a
Jewish strategy for
how to deal with strangers in their midst. Ius gentium was assumed to
be a universal law, “an intercultural law known to all peoples, later
portrayed as a universal law flowing from a natural reason common to all
mankind.”12 Grotius saw Noahide
law as an early universal law, the basis for international law.
Talmudic World Order to the Dragon
the Noahide laws were
universal, Grotius and the majority of those who followed him have assumed
that they must be rational, by which they meant that the laws could be
intuited even without any external or divine guidance.13 Some Talmudic
sources also seem to take that view of the issue,4 leading writers such as
Moses Mendelssohn, Martin Buber, and Hermann Cohen,14 as well as
contemporary thinkers such as David Novak and Nahum Rakover,15 to assume
that the Noahide laws were a Jewish
vision of an intuitive universal law.
world.....all who dwell upon the earth whose names are not written in the
Lambs Book of Life will worship the beast, and they will say, "Who can
do battle against the beast, in fear
Fox, however, argued against the concept of natural law in Judaism, in
general and specifically regarding Noahide
law.16 Faced with sources that identified some laws as intuitive, Fox
claimed that the Talmud only meant that they were explicable, that after God
had commanded them, they could be explained in a way that all people would accept
accept the Mark
of the Beast
prove that Noahide
laws were not supposed to be intuitive, Fox pointed to Maimonides' ruling
that observance of these laws earned non-Jews a share in the World to Come
only if they obeyed them as a response to God's command.17 Someone who
figures out Noahide
law independently, Maimonides wrote, may qualify as wise, but not as one of
the Righteous of the Nations, his term for non-Jews who properly fulfill
God's wishes.5 Insisting on an awareness of divine command, Fox
correctly argues, means that Jews were not satisfied with observance of Noahide
law because of its appeal to reason.6
than argue further about whether Noahide
laws were intuitive, it seems most correct to accept the middle position
suggested by Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, among others.18 Explicitly
avoiding expressing an opinion on the issue of natural law, Rabbi
Lichtenstein noted that Jewish sources certainly assumed the existence of an
intuitive and universally binding morality.19 That morality, however,
is not coterminous with Noahide
law, as Norman Lamm and Aaron Kirschenbaum also wrote.20
details of the Noahide
laws we will discuss in a moment lead to that same conclusion. Our
analysis shows that regardless of whether the Noahide
laws were intuitive, their details7 go far beyond any kind of intuitive or
natural law. Reviewing these particularistic pieces of Noahide
law will reveal the nomos, the underlying vision of
the kind of a world its adherents should inhabit, embedded within Noahide
Dan:11:14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
To anticipate, we will find
that Noahide laws
obligate non-Jews to view themselves as members of a society dedicated to a
joint set of beliefs rather than as individuals free of positive obligation
to the society as a whole, to concede the existence of a single God and to
refrain from rebelling against Him,21 to adopt a radically strict respect
for rights to property and life, to be aware of proper and improper forms of
sexuality, and to recognize the seriousness of making use of animals as
food. After proving those generalizations, we can consider what that
suggests about American law.
Blasphemy against the Only One IAMHE, Jesus
the Christ, for their Dragon and his devils
commandment to establish courts has received too much attention for us to
meaningfully summarize it here.22 Two aspects of the commandment,
though, show that it was geared towards forming a sense of a cohesive
society, not just one that headed off conflict among its
collective of shabbos goyim slaves
accuracy of that view of the law depends on which position we accept in a
medieval disagreement about the scope of the obligation. In his
codification of the law, Maimonides added that this commandment explained
why all the people of Shechem23 --in the Biblical story of the abduction and
rape of Dinah-- deserved their deaths at the hands of Simeon and Levi.
See Iraq, Afghanistan, NEW ORLEANS
In Maimonides' view, all
those present were capitally obligated to protest and judge their prince's
abduction of Dinah, the daughter of Jacob; their failure to do so made them
liable for death.9
See Road Map to HELL, Gaza Disengagement of the
Hassidic Talmudic RED Sofiet Chabad Lubavitch
More than just solving the
theological problem of how Simeon and Levi, generally admired in Jewish
tradition, could commit mass murder,
Maimonides here expresses a forceful view of non
-Jews' responsibility to insure the observance of the Noahide
assumption of extensive observer-responsibility is itself certainly not
intuitive, as shown, at the very least, by Nahmanides' (a thirteenth century
Catalonian Talmudist and Biblical commentator) rejecting it.24
Nahmanides instead sees the obligation of dinim as mandating the
establishment of a system of civil law.10 He did not set clear
parameters for what this system had to cover, but gave numerous examples,
including “theft, overcharging, withholding wages, bailments, rape and
seduction, torts, lending, business, and so on.”25
See New Orleans
Nahmanides does not fully define that civil law, the sixteenth-century R.
Moses Isserles assumed that non-Jews had to adopt Jewish law in these
areas.26 Jewish civil law, let us note, is certainly not intuitive;
its laws are derived, analyzed, and elaborated in extensive and complex
Biblical and Talmudic discussions, with debates at most stages of the
process, indicating that even those who grew up in the system were not able
to intuit the law in any simple manner. Isserles, too, would have to
be placed on the list of those who see Noahide
law as particularistic.
if Nahmanides thought that dinin meant that non-Jews would make their own
laws,27 he may still not have thought of those laws as intuitive.
Rather, he may have assumed that the types of laws were intuitive, but that
there was a range of equally acceptable laws dealing with the issues raised
by those areas of law. In addition,
to write their own laws in this area implies that the rest of the system,
where they did not have such power, was not accessible to intuitive
rule-making. Whether we follow Maimonides or Nahmanides in either of
his versions, then, we have only a weak form of natural law, and much of Noahide
law left unexplained.11
these perspectives of the commandment differ sharply from each other, they
nonetheless each envision non-Jews as obligated to create a cohesive society
Collective, sofiet style, Nasi Style
rather than just avoiding
conflict among citizens. This is most clear for Maimonides, who sees
the Noahides as
responsible for the behavior of others in their
see Purim New Orleans
Nahmanides and Isserles, the scope of laws they required still goes beyond
the minimal needs of a working society.12
final aspect of dinin is the Talmud's
each of the seven Noahide laws was
punishable by death,
including theft of a minimal amount of money.28 This severity of
punishment gives the impression that adhering to the standards of the seven
Noahides was the bare minimum that justified human existence;
any of these laws, to any extent, meant that the person had forfeited the
right to life.
That, too, is not only not intuitive, but makes a very Jewish assumption,
that one's right to life depends on adhering to standards of behavior set by
God rather than by man.
the non god of
the jews who say Jesus the Christ is in hell boiling in Human excrement. If
you worship this Jesus, you will be Beheaded
Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
commandments to forego all idolatry and to refrain from blasphemy obligate
non-Jews in monotheistic belief29 and a basic submission to the Creator
within a Jewish model.
I do, His name is Jesus the Lord God Almighty,
and your souls are cast into the pit where there is outer darkness forever
Considering that paganism was alive
and well in the societies where Jews lived in the time of the Mishnah and
the Talmud--Christianity did not conquer the Roman world until the fourth
century, and Persia was a pagan society even beyond that time-- it is
unreasonable to claim that Jews thought that these rules were intuitive.13
Talmudic references to the explicability of the prohibition of idol worship
meant only that non-Jews could readily understand why Jews, who believed in
one God, would see idol worship as violating their mores.14
They hated the
LORD and crucified his, and they all....ALL cried out "Give us the
Robber" their Dragon
particular, the rules about idol worship
to learn and understand Jewish views of what it means to worship a deity.
We can easily understand that non-Jews would be prohibited from worshipping
any idol according to its ordinary manner of worship (ke-darkah); what
becomes more surprising is the system's calling for the death penalty for a
non-Jew who bows down, offers incense, sacrifices, or libates to an idol;30
in contrast, other acts of admiration and love for the idol--kissing,
hugging, washing, dusting-- do not incur the death penalty. The
included forms of worship make the list because they were the ones that
could constitute an avodat penim, an act of worship that occurred within the
sanctuary of the Temple itself.
a system asserts that particular acts count as worship regardless of the
interpretation of those acts in the minds of the people performing them, it
is privileging those acts, announcing that Temple forms of worship carry an
objective weight not true of other forms of affection or obeisance. To
adhere to this law properly and avoid the death penalty, non-Jews
would have to engage and understand Jewish rules for each of these kinds of
non-Jews could obey the Noahide
blasphemy regulation without any particularly Jewish knowledge--the law
simply prohibits cursing God,
using any term that
clearly refers to Him32-
Striking GOD from the Allegiance to the flag,
OUR Father, Jesus the LORD God, etc
are nonetheless being required to recognize and accept Judaism's views of
the consequences of certain kind of behavior towards God.
from the beginning, their father, who is not the life Giver
murder is intuitive, but the particular rules codified by Noahide
laws are not nearly as obvious. The killing of either a fetus
(abortion) or a person who will certainly die within a defined period of
time, or bringing about someone's death indirectly but deliberately (such as
by tying her up in a place where a train will run over her) all qualify as
capital murder in the Noahide
Or by Talmudic assisted suicide by Hospices
against a persons knowledge, by Morphine. Or by Haarp assisted chemtrail
33 American society's raging debate about abortion and assisted
suicide shows that these are not intuitive rules; more than that, these
rules show that the Noahide
system expected people to treat all human life, however underdeveloped or
certain to end, as out of bounds to human decisions about when it should
the goyim saints of Jesus, ok saith these Talmudic Hassidic Vipers of Hell
laws as a class may be intuitive,35 but the Noahide
version is certainly not. Maimonides concluded that
were prohibited from engaging in intercourse with their mothers, father's
wives, married women, maternal sisters, men, and animals,36 primarily based
on the Talmudic parsing of the first verse in Scripture that discusses human
marriage. The verse reads “therefore shall a man leave his mother
and father and cleave to his wife and they shall be one flesh,”37 which
to assert that sexuality cannot be expressed with one's
parents (since the man is supposed to leave his parents, with the father's
wife standing in for the father himself), must create a physical cleaving of
the sort that only men and women can create (not men and men),38 must be
with one's own wife as opposed to somebody else's, and must be of the kind
of union that could turn them into one flesh, which rules out bestiality.
Talmud: It is ok
for a rib-eye priest to satan the dragon to marry a woman who has had sex
with an animal. It is ok for a priest to have sex with a girl, less than
three years and a day, for it is as the tearing of the tear Duct, she will
in this presentation, is an extension of marriage; only those relationships
that could be marital are allowed.39 Marriage, and therefore sex,
could only happen outside the original nuclear family and only with partners
who could theoretically lead to offspring.40 Even without insisting
that sex happen only within marriage, Noahide
law was requiring that it take the form of a marital act, and that it not
interfere in any preexisting marriage.15
murder, theft is intuitive, but the Noahide
reaction to it goes beyond what intuition would urge. Theft of even
the most minimal amounts of money, even if the victim of the theft is
himself not the rightful owner, incurs the death penalty.
keep in Mind, Chapter 13 of the revelation of
Jesus the Christ, the Dragon has given these Hassidic Vipers their power and
their seat ad their authority. They will establish their own guidelines by
In the most
extreme example, if one
steals a minimal amount of money from a
thief who himself stole that money, both would be liable for death.
ok for a jew.
Mt:23:4: For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
More than seeking to protect property, which could be done through less
extreme measures, Noahide
law was making clear that violating others' rights to their possessions
forfeited one's own right to life in that society.
purged for the
good of the shem sham collective of wannabe gods
Min haHay--The Limbs of a Living Animal
who see Noahide law
as either a natural law or a minimal political law identify the prohibition
of ever min hahay, eating the limb of an animal that was removed while it
was still alive, as an issue of cruelty to animals.41 That would be
true if the rule forbade cutting off the limb of an animal, but it only
actually prohibits eating a limb that was cut off before the animal's death.
We need to focus on what the rule addresses in trying to understand its
purpose in the code.
that Jewish tradition thought that Adam was not allowed to eat meat at all
suggests that ever min hahay (limb from a living animal) was a food
prohibition, not a cruelty one. When, after the Flood, God allowed people to
eat meat (in Judaism's
of early human
history), He required
them to insure that the meat was dead before they ate it. Animals were
now acceptable sources of food, but they only became so after they had died
or been killed. The seriousness of the prohibition was to stress how
off limits animals were expected to be while they were still alive.
together, the seven Noahide
laws thus obligate those who would live as resident aliens in a Jewish
(USA, HJR 104,
PL 102-14, 1991, 102nd Congress )
to accept fundamental Jewish ideas in four areas of life--the
relationship to God, to sex, to others' lives and property, and to food.
Resident aliens would not need to become Jews to be tolerated,43 but they
would have to accept and adopt basic Jewish beliefs in realms that go to the
core of human self-perception.
Goyim of the shem sham shemborg collective of Olam haba or Hoodlum haha, as I
like to term their filthy perversion and "Replacement Theology"
against the Redeemer from the Beginning, the Word of God, the Word who hath
created everything created, the Lamb, the Living Word, Jesus the Christ
this the entirety of Noahide
law, it would already teach us a great deal about how Jews expected the
non-Jews in their midst to live.44 To round out the picture of Noahide
law, however, we need to consider two more aspects of that system, its
codifying rules that emphasize the differences between Noahides and Jews and
its expectation that Noahides would go beyond these rules and observe a set
of unenforced obligations.
the status of a ger toshav,
shabbos goyim proselyte slave to the Dragon
the Jewish legal term for a lawful permanent
resident of a Jewish commonwealth, earned the non-Jew equal support in the
minimal social welfare network,45 several rules highlight the system's
insistence that non-Jews remember, recognize, and respect their status as
outsiders. First, the Sifre, an extra-Talmudic collection of
authoritative Scriptural inferences, rules that even such non-Jews may not
live in Jewish cities.46 The requirement to set up separate
communities stresses that they are being accepted and tolerated, but only as
outsiders; full inclusion requires conversion.
for fear of the
jews many became jews, made two fold the children of hell the Hassidim
Phaisees proselytes. See Judeo-Churchinsanity
themes underlie Talmudic statements about the significance of a non-Jew
striking a Jew, observing the Sabbath, and studying Torah. In each
case, the Talmudic rhetoric stresses that non-Jews need to accept that they
are not part of the special community that Jews view themselves to be.
wanne be gods, the superior of mankind, for they
chose the "ROBBER" the murderer from the beginning, thus the lust
of their father the murderer they do.
In the first example, the Talmud characterizes a non-Jew striking a Jew as
akin to striking God.
for in their laws they say they are as gods, and
they CRUCIFIED, him by which the WORD came, for he said he was the SON of GOD.
Wisdom is Justified of, by her children
That phrasing emphasizes the Talmud's assumption
of Jewish exceptionalism, that the Jews' more detailed legal system gives
them a special status as God's representatives on earth.
their Talmudic non god, the Tetragrammaton YHVH,
Who they say has no only begotten Son, the WORD of God the Creator, from the
beginning. For their leaders the Pharisee Hassidim, the husbandmen, said
"There is the SON of the Noble man, let us KILL him and rob his
inheritance, thus they Crucified the ONLY Begotten SON of God, his Image.
Now they seek to make one who will come in his own name their king, and this
one is the false Christ, son of perdition, their Moshiach ben satan, and he
will slay the saints of Jesus the Christ by their false peace of their
Universal Noahide Demonicrazy, wonderfully.
striking a Jew becomes more than a simple tort, it becomes an offense
against God Himself.47
other two examples involve areas of Jewish life that were seen as so
particular to Jews that non-Jews were not allowed to take part; the Talmud
assumed, in fact, that God
(DRAGON their god of this world) would treat non-Jews' trespassing these
boundaries as a capital crime.
and the apostate goyim sleep, and have "Fallen
Away" from Truth.
Study of Torah was seen as the vehicle
of a unique bond between God and the Jewish people,48 so that a non-Jew who
studied Torah was breaking into this bond, and deserving of death.49
Their Torah is Mishnah Torah of Talmud Bavli,
their tradition which Makes the Written WORD of God of none effect. Their
Babble belongs to their non god, the Dragon the murderer and the murder for
their father they do
The right to take a day a week to cease all productive activity--the
Sabbath-- was also seen as a special gift to the Jewish people; humans
in general had to devote every day to being productive, to contributing to
the settlement of the world.17
the slaves of
the shem wanna be gods
of being a resident alien in a Jewish land, then, was recognizing the limits
that status placed on participating in the majority society. Full
participation was readily available, but only to those who actually
converted to the culture, lifestyle, and, in this case, religion of the
ONLY them who
submit to the Beast, and his Mark and the number of his name, hahaMoshiach ben
David and his Magan David and he is their king=tet=9 and their Tzadik=90 and
they say is their ultimate final Tzadik = 900
right to left in their language 900909/600606
Aspects of Noahide
now we have only reviewed the prohibitions of Noahide
law, but several sources suggest that there were positive expectations as
well. A tantalizing Talmudic statement as well as non-Jews' right to
voluntarily accept specific mitsvot highlight the system's assumption that
codified Noahide law
was just the minimum; non-Jews were expected to supplement the prohibitions
of Noahide law with
(self-initiated) practices that give positive content to their spiritual
as head of Sanhedrins US Supreme court, for he is a shabbo's goyim obedient
Freemason Noahide, and has his rewards. He will help the Hasssidic Sanhedrin
who controls Bushitler to enforce these satanic laws of the Assyrian
Sumerian Doctrine of Devils against the Only Everlasting Holy Covenant Jesus
the Christ, God and his Father.
Tractate Hullin,18 the Talmud mentions that non-Jews accepted thirty
positive commandments, although it hastens to add that they only managed to
stay faithful to three of those.19 Without trying to fully unpack the
statement, it clearly shows the Talmud's approval of non-Jews' independently
legislating obligations outside of the original Noahide
Here they bring
in Acts of the Jerusalem Council by the so called freemason dog, James the
Just, who sent a letter by Paul the apostle to the churches that they must
partake in the leaven of the Pharisees. Paul took the letter, but REFUSED to
teach the law, But only Preached Salvation by Grace through the Lamb of GOD
the only atonement to the Father. They put Paul into prison and later
statement, somewhat off the beaten path of the Talmudic discussion of
non-Jews,20 could not on its own support a claim that they were expected to
develop a positive relationship with God as well. In the midst of its
discussion of the Noahide
laws, however, the Talmud notes that its list includes only prohibitions,
not requirements of action,51 suggesting that there might be an extensive
set of positive obligations not clearly codified in the Talmud.
Indeed, the next sentence asserts that non-Jews must exercise justice,52
while other Talmudic statements assume that non-Jews were required to give
charity and to bear children.53
that positive obligation seriously means that Jews saw non-Jews as obligated
by a law that taught them basic propositions about life, but that also
reminded them to expand that minimal law in positive ways.
Mk:7:6: He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
Lk:8:12: Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved.
similar to Adam's original mandate to “work and preserve” God's garden,
non-Jews were supposed to bear children, give charity, set up a just
society, and live productive lives, with the exact definition of those later
terms left open to the sincere judgment of the non-Jews involved.21
33: Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:
34: And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.
35: And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.
36: Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise.
37: But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son.
38: But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.
39: And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.
40: When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
41: They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
42: Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
43: Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
44: And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
45: And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.
46: But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet.
Jewish Versions of Worship
those non-Jews uncomfortable with such an open-ended set of requirements,
one more option was available, an option that is particularly surprising in
light of our earlier discussion. Jewish authorities generally assumed
a non-Jew's right to observe any commandments of the Torah other than the
Sabbath and Torah study and to be rewarded by God for that action.
Talmud Bavli to their filthy non god the Dragon
who has given them their seat and power and their authority over all
mankind, but the saints whose names are written in the Lamb's Book of Life,
slain from the foundation of the WORLD, Jesus the Christ the Creator
Most surprisingly, Maimonides
(Prophet of Baa'l)
allows a Jew to circumcise a non-Jew, as long
as the non-Jew intends the act to fulfill the Biblical commandment of
and denies the
circumcision of their hearts in TRUTH and Righteousness to the ONLY Righteous.
This is nothing but perverted sick genital mutilation of Mohell's of Hell and
death their covenant with flesh they have made unto themselves. Yea they have
"REPLACED" the Lord God the Creator from the beginning, the same
Redeemer God of spiritual Israel, by their Mystery Babylon and their Assyrian
Sumerian Doctrine of devils.
note this in particular because the Bible and Talmud54 assume that
circumcision, like the Sabbath, created a covenant between God and the
Jewish people;55 letting non-Jews circumcise without any intention of
converting allows them into a circle that might otherwise be clearly thought
of as exclusive to the Jewish people.22
broke the Covenant of eternal Life through the REDEEMER, and Chose the
"Robber" and crucified the Chooser, and will not repent of their
sorceries and murders and blasphemies and thefts of mankind, for the religion of
the jews is contrary unto all mankind. Now the apostate fallen away Judeo-Churchinsanist
led by the wolve's in sheep's clothing the Telly Tubby Mammonite televangelist
eat of their leaven, and are made two fold the children of their flesh broken
Covenant against Jesus the Christ the Iamhe, the Creator from the beginning.
They have watered down Jesus to a mere man and they believe not in
Righteousness, so God has sent them a strong delusion so they believe the lie
and will surely perish in eternal Damnation. Are you one of these who are
leavened with the yeast of the Pharisees, who give bread from death, and not
life the Living Bread? Jesus the Christ the image of the invisible Father?
question of how open Judaism is to the performance of its commandments by
non-Jews is vigorously debated,23 but it offers at least one option for
fleshing out a non-Jew's obligations towards God. That does not mean
that non-Jews are supposed to undertake such obligations, or that these
obligations are the only way for a non-Jew to have a successful relationship
with God. Jewish writers' raising that possibility, though, offers one
final proof that Noahide
law was not seen as the end of a non-Jew's road, but the minimum base from
which to build a fulfilled relationship with God.
and to turn away
from Jesus the Christ the Life and the way to the DRAGON they worship, the
god of the jews who is no GOD the Father.
Jewish Law to American Immigration Concerns
Bushitler's Hassidic Talmudic open Border for Shabbos Goyim ger Toshav's,
plan of the social communitarian Universal slaves of the shemborg collective
of Eretz ITSREALHELL of Babylon proper
have seen that a Jewish commonwealth would demand that any resident aliens
in its midst adopt practices that inculcate and observe fundamental
principles of the larger Jewish society. Those resident aliens would have to
see themselves as members of a society that prevented injustice, they would
have to recognize only a single God
(Dragon, aka. satan)
whom they could not blaspheme, they
would have to strictly respect the sanctity of property that was not their
own and of life, and they would have to limit their intake of animal flesh
to that of animals that were already dead. Beyond that, they were
supposed to adopt positive goals such as childbearing and giving charity,(to
and, more broadly, developing a vision and a practice of how to serve the
a so called single
god of Talmud Bavli which is shekinah gods, male and female, a morphidite non
gods, plural gods of polytheism of Judaism which is not the ONLY Imahe, the
Living God of Israel in spirit, Christ Jesus the Image of his invisible Father,
for HE is the same as the Father. The triune Judeo-Churchapostates of their
"Chosen" also worship non gods and have watered down the IAMHE to a
secondary figure mangod. Are you one of these prosperity mammonites to strange
gods who are no GOD?
universalist model of having one legal system inform another would argue for
the United States to adopt the entire Noahide
system. Since Jewish law thought of this as the bare minimum of
acceptable society, Jews might hope that any non-Jewish society would adopt
those laws as well. Fine for the traditionalist and believer,56 that
model only works for those already convinced of the second system's greater
rightness than the first.
the fallen away from
Righteousness who God has sent a strong delusion and they believe the Talmudic
Judeo-Chruchiani9ty lie of their father the murderer from the beginning.
second option does not concede nearly as much to Noahide
law. In a structural adaptation, we would note that Noahide
law picked on God, society (meaning property and personal rights and
safety), sexuality, and food as areas to legislate for resident
Taking the categories but not the content, we might then argue that resident
aliens should be specifically regulated in those areas as well.
too, however, Professor Stone's complaint about trying to import what is
essentially a religious system into what is essentially a secular one still
the Noahide system
does suggest, however, is a general social principle that current U.S. law
ignores. That is, Noahide
law stresses, inter alia, that Jewish society stands for different values
than other societies. Those who would join that society, even
partially, must be introduced to, and accept upon
themselves, at least
fundamental aspects of that society's worldview. Full citizens, of
course, need to accept the whole picture; partial citizens--and anyone
allowed to live in a society for the rest of his or her natural life is
certainly a partial citizen--need to accept less, but at least the basic
beliefs of that society and commit to promoting their continued welfare.
sick treason and
blasphemy of Bushilter and his puppe tmasters the Chassidim Chabad Lubavitch
becomes relevant to this country when we remember that every society, no
matter how universalist in its rhetoric, actually espouses a particular
worldview, both in terms of definition of the good life and of how to get
there. Robert Cover noted twenty years ago that law always constitutes
a nomos, a vision of an ideal world towards which that society strives.57
Stanley Fish repeatedly reminds his readers of how much every human being
and every society is locked into its own assumptions about how the world
does and should work.58
this necessary aspect of our-- and any-- culture can help us articulate a
vision both of citizenship and of alienage. Citizens are members of a
society dedicated to a particular set of ideals and a worldview of how best
to actualize those ideals in practice. Of course, in countries like
the U.S. where citizenship is granted by birth, an educational process has
to occur to ready children to become proper adult citizens, but the goal of
that education is to inculcate whatever the society sees as its central
values and processes.
Via the Red Sofiet
Talmudic Communitarian Socialistic "Education Day USA" shem of shame
of haha Bushitlers and his rib-eyes of Hell who control him
addition, that self-definition needs to be adjusted frequently, as societies
change over time. The United States today would not define itself
exactly as the Founding Fathers would have, so that we could not simply
expect prospective citizens to read their writings and declare them ready
The total destruction of the Constitution of the
People by the People and FOR the people. To a despotic Global sick Tyranny
of the DEVIL. And the masses sleep, led by their telly tubby televangelsit
of false Gospel
But American society does differ from the rest of
world, and the extent of a person's acceptance of and participation in those
differences should determine his or her acceptance in that society.
and if you stand
firm in the testimony and the witness of Jesus the Christ who is the
Everlasting Father, the Almighty God, they will purge you from heir little
empire of their Dragon and his soon to be "REVEALED" Moshiach ben
satan the false Christ.
is not my intent here to articulate or promote my own view of those defining
ideals, since more qualified people have already done so, from many
perspectives, and I have no reason to think that my own vision is more
persuasive than that of others. What seems unequivocal, though, is
that the United States, as a society, stands for important and significant
ideals, and that part of citizenship is embracing those ideals, certainly
theoretically, and, where possible, actively.
responses to this claim might be that a) the U.S. makes an ideal of giving
its citizens the freedom not to care about the welfare of the society and b)
that, empirically, Americans do not share any common set of ideals.
are not a shemborg collective of obedient
the first, I concede that the freedom to be apathetic is part of our
conception of freedom, but that does not mean that we promote it; part of
our vision of a tolerant society is that we do not penalize action or
inaction just because we find it distasteful. Our allowing citizens to
remain ignorant of this society's goals and welfare, then, does not indicate
our condoning their so doing.
the bonds of American society have frayed in recent years is also readily
conceded; part of the goal of this article is to call for rearticulating the
general principles around which we all can rally.
The bonds they have destroyed from within.
Whether those ideals
are electoral democracy,
individualism, libertarianism, equality of all peoples, or some combination
of those and other ideals I have left off the list, a vigorous debate about
how to properly articulate the fundamental beliefs of this country should go
far to reminding Americans of how much they share in common, regardless of
their beliefs about abortion, homosexuality, or other hot-button issues
to some consensus about what we mean by citizenship would inherently allow
us to improve our education of our citizens towards that
see the Protocols of zion of the Illuminated
Hassidic 'masters" how they will inculcate our children by the teaching
of their Dragon in OUR Schools by Blasphemy and TREASON, Education Day USA
to make citizenship more than just membership in a club, or a set of rights
and even of obligations.60 The full rights and responsibilities of
being an American would devolve to those who accept and adhere to the
American worldview, and to furthering the prosperity of the society that
adopts that worldview.24
Open Borders to
all who will accept the DRAGON and his Hassidic shemborg of murder and
Blasphemy into their Socialistic World View of Tyranny
main concern here, though, is with aliens. Recognizing the nomos
aspect of law, we can better identify what separates Americans from
non-citizens. Resident aliens, who have been granted the right to live
in this country for the rest of their lives, are not required to commit to
such fundamental American ideals as rule of law, tolerance of others,
individual rights, and so on.61
lacuna in the law becomes all the more remarkable when we recognize the
truth of Alexander Aleinikoff's
claim that once immigrants are accepted as
LPR's, naturalization is relatively routine.62
treated as Leper's
If the biggest hurdle
for a non-American to get to this country is securing a permanent visa, it
should be at that point that we insure that the prospective immigrant in
fact sympathizes with the American Project (or Creed or Dream).
"Amarakan" Dream of Noahide slavery unto their mammon
course, we cannot expect them to immediately accept all the facets of that
project. Luckily, as Michael Walzer points out, worldviews can be
expressed in thicker and thinner forms.63 The Noahide
have shown, were a
thinner form of the thick Jewish worldview,
leaven of the Pharisees of the Dragon their
father the murderer from the beginning
dealing only with the most central issues and in a much more attenuated form
than in the system as a whole. Translated to American terms, LPR's
could be required, upon arrival (or before leaving their home countries) to
commit to some modest version of that American Creed, enough of it that the
United States can feel comfortable with their commitment to join American
society to a minimal extent.64
Do you see what
they have done?
from suggesting that America needs to articulate its worldview clearly, both
for its citizens and for those who would at least partially join American
society, the Noahide
model promotes a particular view of language requirements, aliens' rights,
dual citizenship, and the “transitional” model of alienage suggested by
and now they put fear and Terror and destruction and devastation upon the
apostate Amarakan's turned from the ONLY Messiah, to force them to submit
and accept the beast and his Mark, his star of Molech, that Magan David of
their sorcery to their Dragon, that old serpent the Devil
requirement for citizens to demonstrate proficiency in English has come
under attack in some articles, on the grounds that prospective citizens can
understand and accept their responsibilities in other languages as well.
Remembering that a legal system represents a worldview strongly suggests
including language proficiency in the citizenship requirement.
Language shapes how people think and express themselves;65 once we recognize
that law inherently inculcates a worldview, it makes sense to require
citizens to be able to think and express themselves in the language of the
Noahide law points
out, come in three versions. There are the rights of human beings by
virtue of their humanity, rights of partial members of society-- as
recognition of partial common cause-- and rights of citizens, which express
the fraternity and mutual fructification that comes with sharing a
Their are GOD given
Rights and Freedom by Salvation for the citizen's of a Kingdom far away which
has the ONLY King of Kings. Sion is that Kingdom. I am not "Patriotic"
to any kingdom of the devil, nor enslaved by accepting him and his beast and his
Moshiach and his shemgods who are of the Murderer from the Beginning. I owe my
only allegiance to that KING and that Kingdom. To that Kingdom by faith in the
KING Jesus the Christ, I stand Firm. Thus these vipers, these husbandmen will
also seek to slay the saints of the Living Word of God.
The two fold
children of Hell, these Noahide Telly Tubby Judaised Televangelist lead the
apostate masses of their flesh into the pit along with death and hell, where
there is gnashing of teeth in outer darkness forever. Are you one of these who
love your lives and trade your souls for the flesh life and then the second
in America ought to work the same way. Some minimal rights of welfare
should be extended to all those present in society (regardless of
Total Socialism of the Treasonous Vipers of
Washington DC led by their Chassidim of the Dragon and their One World Odor
stinch of the Talmudic non gods of Judaism of Hell and death their Covenant
they have made.
simply because they are human beings in our midst.
Those who come to join society partially, by accepting permanent residence,
would have access to a broader, but not complete, set of rights.67 The
differentiation is not for its own sake, but as part of reminding ourselves
and others that the nomos of America is what allows the society to flourish,
and the full benefits of that flourishing properly devolve only to those who
are sworn to promoting the country's continued welfare.
IF you are
not with them, you are against them.....G.W. Bushitler
articulation of the American creed will also help answer dual citizenship
questions. There are numerous countries in the world which, while not
holding to the same nomos as the United States, are nonetheless close enough
to predict few times of conflict for citizens of both.
Noahide Countries of goyim. Noahide Demoncratic
nation building of "Pax Judaica"
worldviews present much more significant problems for citizens' ability to
serve both countries fully at the same time.
Rather than deciding on
dual citizenship as a general policy, the Noahide
example suggests that political decisions would need to be made about each
country separately, to see whether its worldview corresponds well enough to
the American one to expect that citizens could reasonably identify with both
countries at the same time.
the Noahide example
suggests that Hiroshi Motomura's argument in favor of granting LPRs certain
rights so as to foster their transition to citizenship68 should be encased
in some other rubric. When immigrants arrive in this country, they
might be asked whether they intend to become citizens after the waiting
period or not. Those who assert their intent to naturalize could be
given a wider basket of benefits immediately,
Welfare, Foodstamps and Mammon of the jews who
control all monetary institutes
to foster their transition, as
Motomura suggested. Of course, if they failed to naturalize after some
set period of time, they would revert to ordinary LPRs, with the more
limited rights and benefits involved.
Submit to their
Dragon and receive their shemborg reward. Do not, and be shunned or
law in the Jewish system thus highlights one model of how to deal with
outsiders who wish to come into a nation's midst. To the extent that
they intend to remain outsiders, the host society nonetheless has to insure
that they understand and respect the central and crucial values of that
society. In doing so, the aliens become partial members with access to
some of the benefits of membership.
such a system into place--the practical lesson I would recommend drawing
from our study of the Noahide
system-- requires clearly articulating our central values, or at least
engaging in a political process to decide what form those values take at the
present historical moment.
waving little chinese made "Apostate
Amarakan" dime store 'Patriotic flags, and a moment of silence to the
That statement of values can strengthen
citizenship, both birthright and naturalized, making it more than a set of
rights or membership in a club, turning it into a commitment and an
obligation to participate in fostering the good health of the society that
articulates this particular view of the world.
Mt:12:30: He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
from the thick creed to be used by citizens, adapting the ideas of the Noahide
system would call for developing a thinner version of that creed as well.
Outsiders would be expected to commit to that thinner version, as the price
of entry into a society whose workings differ--greatly or minimally--from
the workings of their home society.
point of demanding this of permanent residents is not to set up a barrier to
their entry into American society. Indeed, I see no reason why those
who hope to naturalize need to be made to wait a full five years from entry.
To the extent that they understand what America is and means, and can
present reasonable evidence of the sincerity of their attachment to this
country, there is no reason that five years should be the magic time
period.69 The point of demanding this is so that we all, citizens and
not, understand what it means to be an American, and take seriously
membership in that society, whether as a citizen or as an LPR, in order, as
our founding phrase goes, to form a more perfect Union.
to their DRAGON of
TALMUD BAVLI, Mystery BABYLON
News Part 276
14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"
section 16 "The
Beast Has Risen"