Noahide News

Part 393

Feb. 13 , 2006 AD of Our LORD Jesus the Christ the Creator

Happy "New World Odor"

Talmudic Dragon Moon Calendar  Shevat 16, 5766 ,   their Babylonian times of their  Babylonian Sumerian Doctrine and laws 5766

 

Ps:118:24: This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.

 

 The FINISH 

of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.

mason seal

Extra Extra

http://www.shmais.com/picofdayall.cfm

 

Apostate Amaraka, you have made the Judeo-Churchinsanity Covenant with Death and Hell, Beware.......for the time is ripe for a great Harvest

Satanic Pictures
Much damage was done to the East-West relations by
the Satanic Pictures, but there is more
damage to be expected elsewhere.


By Israel Shamir
2-12-6
 
The West was not amused by burning embassies in Beirut and elsewhere. "Them there Muslims do not understand our sense of humour; they do not understand our idea of liberty". - droned the newspapers. Others condemned the tactless escapade of the Danes but thought the reaction was quite out of proportion. However the flare up was anything but incidental.
 
A resourceful American journalist Christopher Bollyn investigated the Danish Satanic Pictures and their procurer, one Flemming Rose, and found out that Rose was not an innocent lover of freedom of speech, neither was he some quaint Scandinavian collector of smut pictures with religious connotations who kept his presentations of the Muslim prophet next to that of a Nun-with-the-Great Dane. Rose was a devotee of the Zionist Neo-Con cult, and made a pilgrimage to the pope of this persuasion -- Daniel Pipes, wrote Bollyn.
 
So far, so good. But the execrable Rose peddled his stuff four months ago, and that's a long time, as the media counts. The Muslims did not even notice his effort, as possibly not many of them read the Jylland Pest. Like a naughty child who multiplies his effort when his well-prepared jibe fails to annoy, eleven newspapers in seven countries republished the pictures simultaneously. It was a show of hands: behind various newspapers in various countries, beyond companies and corporations, we were allowed to see the Enemy, the Not-So-Hidden Hand, the player on the international scene across all borders.
 
Who is the Enemy? Christendom was called the culprit by many other observers. But to be sure, the same people who offended Muslims do not think twice before offending believing Christians ­ it is enough to recall the Cross changing into a Swastika on the posters of Amen, the movie, or the crucifix in a glass of piss (an illustration to the Talmud?) in a New York Museum. Thus we have to exonerate Christians and look elsewhere.
 
The Israeli daily Haaretz made its first objective clear: the Muslim press shows Sharon and rabbis in a disrespectful light, let them try their own medicine. This amounts to an admission that the Jews and their Mammonite allies are behind the publication. The Iranians did not allow the Enemy to sow discord between the Muslims and the Christians, but turned instead to anti-Jewish holocaust jokes. Equally tasteless, it was a reasonable tit-for-tat.
Indeed, Judeo-Mammonite control of the Western mass media is impressive. It only begins with the Middle East: I encountered it when my book Galilee Flowers that called for the dismantling of the Jewish state by peaceful means of universal suffrage, was incinerated by the decision of a court of Paris, and no freedom-loving newspaper in the whole of Europe would say a word in its defence.
 
Jewish control continues with the holocaust taboo enforcement. We saw it when the mind-police kidnapped Ernst Zundel from his home in the US, locked him up for two years in Canadian jail and shipped him to the German gaol, while the mainstream media kept mum. We noticed it when a British historian, respectable David Irving, was snatched and dropped into an Austrian casemate, and no newspaper in the whole of Europe dared to call for his release. The only major treatment of Irving affair in Britain was that by Judaeophilic Malte Herwig in The Observer. He pours scorn on the captive prisoner like Feuchtwanger on Bukharin in the worst tradition of 1937' trials: "The discredited right-wing historian David Irving arrogance is at the heart of Irving's desire for outrage - or something more sinister?"
 
As opposed to its 'deniers' or 'revisionists', I never thought of the Holocaust narrative is the basis of Jewish power. It is, in my view, just an indicator of that power, nothing more, neither less. And that power is great. Jewish media control has infiltrated the Western nerve system. While the Jyllands Posten of Flemming Rose is semi-fascist and neo-con, (Talmudic Jew)  its sister newspaper, belonging to the same owner, Politiken, is liberal and humanist, and also run by a Jew who became an Israeli citizen. Thus, a left- or a right-wing Dane will be fed by the same spoon.
 
see protocols of satan's RED Sofiets
 
But the Jewish control does not stop at the Middle East, or at the Jews, and for a good reason. A tank can be used as a nut-cracker, but it has more functions than that. The unified and perfected Jewish media machine can be utilised for much more important tasks than fighting off holocaust jokes. Its main goal is to bring us to the Brave New World, to the new spiritless totalitarianism, while smaller tasks are incidental to the great one.
 
Last month there were a few important but apparently unconnected developments. The British PM Tony Blair, made a step towards total control over his population. England introduced a new computer system that collects and stores data of car traffic. Connected to ubiquitous video cameras, it allows the Big Brother to trace your movements from your work to your girlfriend and to your home. It passed without a hitch. Then it tried to pass the Internet Terror Bill, that would have given police the power to shut down websites which "promote terrorism". The House of Lords blocked it. Last month the Lords threw out plans for a new offence of "glorifying" acts of terrorism. The Government was also defeated when peers voted to redraft ministers' version of the offence of "intentionally" or "recklessly" disseminating a "terrorist publication". And the best of all, the indomitable Lords blocked the bill against "religious hatred" which was supposed to close the only loophole for criticising Jews.
 
After that, the Adversary splashed the Satanic Pictures. The predictable and predicted reaction of the offended Muslims will force the parliaments to accept the new set of 'anti-hate' laws. The Jews, the preferred mascot of the Mammonites, will feel better protected, but more important, freedom of speech will be gone.
 
This great freedom was the advantage of the West over the Soviet East, for one of the less savoury features of the Soviet regime was its infamous Article 58 of the Criminal Code "Anti-Soviet propaganda". In the early Stalin's days, one has to express sympathy with the enemies of the Republic to be sentenced; in his heyday, a joke would suffice; in Brezhnev's era it was used to ensure conformity in the society. Even in the very end of the Soviet days, the Damocles' sword of Article 58 influenced all discussion and eventually allowed Gorbachev to carry out his transformation of Russia without a debate. He eliminated the social achievements of the Soviet era, surrendered Russian industry and oil to a few Jewish crooks, gave the keys of the Russian might to the CIA and broke up the country into feuding successor states. The only positive feature of Gorbachev-Yeltsin transformation was the removal of Article 58. Now it is creeping back.
 
Some time ago booby-trapped anti-Jewish billboards appeared in Moscow. When a passer-by tried to remove it, the explosive device went off. The government rushed an 'anti-hate' bill through the parliament, and lo! No more anti-Jewish billboards came to be. A month ago, there was an extremely fishy incident in a Moscow synagogue, and a new reinforced 'anti-extremism' bill was introduced into the Russian parliament.
 
Thus, under the cover of fighting extremism, terrorism and hatred, the remainder of freedom on our planet shrinks from day to day. Eugene Rostow, "a Kennedy's Huntington", predicted in 1960s that the two systems, Communism and Capitalism would eventually converge
 
The fourth beast, the Great Harlot Noahide religion unto the Dragon of Talmud Bavli
 
 
and bring forth the best features of both systems. Now the Convergence has actually taken place. Once, the Red East was socially secure, but at the expense of personal freedom, while the West was free at the expense of equality and social guarantees. Now they have converged: the Russians have lost their free schools and health and have received the freedom to sleep under the bridge, while the West now has its own Gulag and its own political dissidents. East and West reinstalled Article 58 under the guise of anti-hate, anti-terrorism, anti-extremism laws.
 
House Joint Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14 
 
 
The grand plan of world domination is unveiling. On its first stage, the power of old elites and of the church was broken. The enemy used democracy and liberty as his weapons against the old order, and we, the Left and the Liberals, enjoyed his support. The adverse vote in the House of Lords (albeit reshuffled and remoulded) proves that the old system with all its faults had some positive qualities. But that stage is over. Now the enemy is fighting against democracy and liberty, employing fear and (anti-)racism.
 
The enemy has the advantage of interaction on the global scale. Following a defeat in England they can attack in France and provoke in Gaza. They can cause grief and feign horror at your response. But we have to win unless we want our children to live in the world of slaves and masters. You do not have to care about Muslim sensibilities or Jewish prejudices ­ it is your freedom at stake. We have to think globally because our enemy acts globally. We must defeat fear and discord, the main tools of the enemy.

____

http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0%2C%2C1708567%2C00.html

Thousands (Millions) would (Will)  die in US strikes on Iran, says study

A surprise American or Israeli air strike on Iranian nuclear sites could cause a large number of civilian as well as military casualties, says a report published today.

The report, Iran: Consequences of a War, written by Professor Paul Rogers and published by the Oxford Research Group, draws comparisons with Iraq. It says the civilian population in that country had three weeks to prepare for war in 2003, giving people the chance to flee potentially dangerous sites. But Prof Rogers says attacks on Iranian facilities, most of which are in densely populated areas, would be surprise ones, allowing no time for such evacuations or other precautions.

"Military deaths in this first wave of attacks would be expected to be in the thousands," he says. "Civilian deaths would be in the many hundreds at least, particularly with the requirement to target technical support for the nuclear and missile infrastructure, with many of the factories being located in urban areas."

The death toll would eventually be much higher if Iran took retaliatory action and the United States responded, or if the US took pre-emptive military action in addition to strikes on nuclear sites.

Prof Rogers, of the University of Bradford's peace studies department, says: "A military operation against Iran would not ... be a short-term matter but would set in motion a complex and long-lasting confrontation. It follows that military action should be firmly ruled out and alternative strategies developed."

The Long Con War

US and other western critics of Tehran say the government there is intent on securing a nuclear weapons capability. The Iranians deny this, saying they are pursuing civilian nuclear energy. The issue could still be resolved diplomatically, but both the US and Israel have said the option of air strikes remains open.

Prof Rogers says the aim of an attack would be to set back Iran's nuclear programme by at least five years. He says Britain could be drawn in as US aircraft would probably use UK bases.

He lists the expected targets as the Tehran Research Reactor, a radioisotope production facility, a range of nuclear-related laboratories, and the Kalaye Electric Company, all in Tehran, and facilities in Isfahan and Natanz.

"The new reactor nearing completion at Bushehr would be targeted, although this could be problematic once the reactor is fully fuelled and goes critical some time in 2006," he says. "Once that has happened, any destruction of the containment structure could lead to serious problems of radioactive dispersal affecting not just the Gulf coast but west Gulf seaboards in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates."

He adds: "All the initial attacks would be undertaken more-or-less simultaneously, in order to kill as many of the technically competent staff as possible, therefore doing the greatest damage to longer-term prospects."

Iran would be unable to prevent such an attack, as it has only limited air defences. But Prof Rogers says it has a large arsenal of responses. It could:

· withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty and pursue speedy development of nuclear weapons capability;

· encourage retaliatory action against Israel by the Lebanese-based Hizbullah group, which has missiles capable of hitting Haifa and several other Israeli cities;

· close the Strait of Hormuz, one of the main access routes for oil from the Gulf;

· send Iranian paramilitary units into states such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates;

· or order Iranian Revolutionary Guards to step up links with insurgents in Iraq.

Prof Rogers says a US or Israeli attack could also help al-Qaida by increasing the anti-US mood in the region and beyond.


_______

http://www.counterpunch.org/phillips02092006.html

February 9, 2006

200 Insiders Against the World

Inside the Global Dominance Group

By PETER PHIILLIPS

The leadership class in the US is now dominated by a neo-conservative (Talmudic Jews and their Sanhedrin led Judeo-Noahide proselytes of freemasonry) group of some 200 people who have the shared goal of asserting US military power worldwide. This Global Dominance Group, in cooperation with major military contractors, has become a powerful force in military unilateralism and US political processes.

A long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant ruling class in the US, which sets policy and determines national political priorities. C. Wright Mills, in his 1956 book on the power elite, documented how World War II solidified a trinity (Iron Triangle) 

sec20C
Is the Iron Triangle Complete? Yep, George W. Bush stated on January, he has
completed the iron triangle. ( or is it truly the iron pyramid of the god of

 

 of power in the US that comprised corporate, military and government elites in a centralized power structure working in unison through "higher circles" of contact and agreement.

Neo-conservatives (Talmudic Hassidim Chabad Lubavitch in Pentagon)  promoting the US Military control of the world (Noahide Global enforcement) are now in dominant policy positions within these higher circles of the US. Adbusters magazine summed up neo-conservatism as: "The belief that Democracy, however flawed, was best defended by an ignorant public pumped on nationalism and religion. Only a militantly nationalist state could deter human aggression Such nationalism requires an external threat and if one cannot be found it must be manufactured."

In 1992, during Bush the First's administration, Dick Cheney supported Lewis Libby and Paul Wolfowitz in producing the "Defense Planning Guidance" report, which advocated US military dominance around the globe in a "new order." The report called for the United States to grow in military superiority and to prevent new rivals from rising up to challenge us on the world stage.

Daniel 11:

3: And a mighty king shall stand up, that shall rule with great dominion, and do according to his will.
4: And when he shall stand up, his kingdom shall be broken, and shall be divided toward the four winds of heaven; and not to his posterity, nor according to his dominion which he ruled: for his kingdom shall be plucked up, even for others beside those.

 

At the end of Clinton's administration, global dominance advocates founded the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Among the PNAC founders were eight people affiliated with the number-one defense contractor Lockheed-Martin, and seven others associated with the number-three defense contractor Northrop Grumman. Of the twenty-five founders of PNAC twelve were later appointed to high level positions in the George W. Bush administration.

In September 2000, PNAC produced a 76-page report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. The report, similar to the 1992 Defense Policy Guidance report, called for the protection of the American (Jerisdiction ITSREALHELL Via HJR 104, PL 102-14 Homelandt SAYKurity led by the Russian RED Sofiet Talmudic Jew Chert-off) Homeland, the ability to wage simultaneous theater wars, perform global constabulary roles, and the control of space and cyberspace.

Gobal Satanic Anti-Christ Force and Noahide Enforcement

 It claimed that the 1990s were a decade of defense neglect and that the US must increase military spending to preserve American geopolitical leadership as the world's superpower. The report also recognized that: "the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event such as a new Pearl Harbor." The events of September 11, 2001 presented exactly the catastrophe that the authors of Rebuilding America' Defenses theorized were needed to accelerate a global dominance agenda. 

Daniel 11:

Olso and the Rabin assassination

5: And the king of the south shall be strong, and one of his princes; and he shall be strong above him, and have dominion; his dominion shall be a great dominion.
6: And in the end of years they shall join themselves together; for the king's daughter of the south shall come to the king of the north to make an agreement: but she shall not retain the power of the arm; neither shall he stand, nor his arm: but she shall be given up, and they that brought her, and he that begat her, and he that strengthened her in these times.

Bush's Talmudic thousand sparks of light Gulf war for ITSREALHELL

7: But out of a branch of her roots shall one stand up in his estate, which shall come with an army, and shall enter into the fortress of the king of the north, and shall deal against them, and shall prevail: 
8: And shall also carry captives into Egypt their gods, with their princes, and with their precious vessels of silver and of gold; and he shall continue more years than the king of the north.
9: So the king of the south shall come into his kingdom, and shall return into his own land. 
10: But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. 
11: And the king of the south shall be moved with choler, and shall come forth and fight with him, even with the king of the north: and he shall set forth a great multitude; but the multitude shall be given into his hand.
12: And when he hath taken away the multitude, his heart shall be lifted up; and he shall cast down many ten thousands: but he shall not be strengthened by it
.

The Attack of the Shembol of Aholah Dan....WTC 911, by Aholibah the King of the south

Brought "Purim Iraq"

13: For the king of the north shall return, and shall set forth a multitude greater than the former, and shall certainly come after certain years with a great army and with much riches.

 

The resulting permanent war on terror has led to massive government defense spending, the invasions of two countries, and the threatening of three others, and the rapid acceleration of the neo-conservative plans for military control of the world.

14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.

The US now spends as much for defense as the rest of the world combined. The Pentagon's budget for buying new weapons rose from $61 billion in 2001 to over $80 billion in 2004. Lockheed Martin's sales rose by over 30% at the same time, with tens of billions of dollars on the books for future purchases. From 2000 to 2004, Lockheed Martins stock value rose 300%. Northrup-Grumann saw similar growth with DoD contracts rising from $3.2 billion in 2001 to $11.1 billion in 2004. Halliburton, with Dick Cheney as former CEO, had defense contracts totaling $427 million in 2001. By 2003, they had $4.3 billion in defense contracts, of which approximately a third were sole source agreements.

At the beginning of 2006 the Global Dominance Group's agenda is well established within higher circle policy councils and cunningly operationalized inside the US Government. They work hand in hand with defense contractors promoting deployment of US forces in over 700 bases worldwide.
There is an important difference between self-defense from external threats, and the belief in the total military control of the world. When asked, most working people in the US have serious doubts about the moral and practical acceptability of financing world domination.

15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.
16: But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed.

 

Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and Director of Project Censored a media research organization. www.project.censored.org

A more in-depth review of the global dominance group's agenda and a list of the 200 advocates see: http://www.projectcensored.org/


______

CRACKDOWN ON HOLOCAUST REDUCTIONISTS: OMEN OF COMING PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS

By Rev. Ted Pike

Today Canadian Christians who publicly criticize homosexuality or blame Jewish leaders for the crucifixion are likely to be indicted as "hate criminals." But in 1971 when B'nai B'rith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress persuaded Parliament to enact their national anti-hate law, these Jewish organizations were wary of alarming Christians. Instead, they began anti-hate law enforcement by going after those least likely to be defended by society: Holocaust reductionists - those who reduce the six million figure of Jewish Holocaust dead.

During the following 30 years, the Canadian public watched passively as Malcolm Ross, Doug Collins, Ernst Zundel, etc., were pilloried by the press and financially exhausted by the courts for the "hate crime" of inquiring whether the number of Jewish Holocaust dead might be less than six million.

Then, around the turn of the century, B'nai B'rith's hate crimes gestapo turned on Christians. More cases have now been prosecuted against Christians (primarily critics of homosexuality) in the last five years than of Holocaust reductionists in the previous 30.

Today holocaust reductionists, Ernst Zundel and Germar Rudolf, have been deported from what they thought was safe haven in America. They face prosecution in Germany for violation of its B'nai B'rith anti-hate law which makes it a "thought crime" to diminish the six million figure of Jewish Holocaust victims.

David Irving, perhaps the world's best-known and respected Holocaust reductionist was arrested and imprisoned several days ago in Austria under its B'nai B'rith hate law.

Also, lesser-known Belgian reductionist Siegfried Verbeke has been arrested in Holland and is awaiting deportation to Germany. Although not a German citizen, a German judge issued an international arrest warrant against him for the German crime of Holocaust reduction.

And, on September 19, Belgian reductionist Vincent Reynouard's house was ransacked by police. He was subjected to more than three hours of detention and hostile questioning. He is free on probation only if he submits to a psychiatric examination and ceases all Holocaust reductionist activities.

Long Arm of Zionist "Justice"

On June 20, 2004 the Jerusalem Post reported that Israel's Knesset empowered the State of Israel to criminalize anyone in the world who publicly reduces the six million figure. The government is now authorized to request extradition to Israel of such alleged "hate criminals" from any nation. Israel can also seize, prosecute, and imprison them should they set foot in Israel.

After Rudolf and Zundel have been tried in German and Austrian courts, Israel can request that they be extradited to stand trial in Israel for their "hate crimes." The American government, not having hate laws, acceded to deportation of Rudolf and Zundel. Germany and Austria, with hate laws in place, are much more likely to comply with Israel's possible demand.

Clearly, we are in the first stages of implementation of the Knesset deportation program. The public is being conditioned to approve the seizure and deportation of anyone who questions Zionism's dubious "Holocaust reality."

Yet tomorrow it will not just be Holocaust reductionists but also Christians who will be shipped to foreign courts. For Knesset, there exists a much greater crime, a crime they believe has caused unimaginable physical and mental Jewish suffering through the last two millennia. This is the accusation, rooted in the New Testament, that Jews were responsible for the crucifixion of Christ. Knesset believes the Holocaust was the result of centuries of New Testament bias, calling Jews "Christ-killers."

Of course, the New Testament does lay blame for Christ's death on Jewish leaders and the mob they incited (Acts 2:36, 3:13-15, etc.). Consequently, evil Jewish leaders today consider the New Testament "hate literature." Millions of Christians who believe the New Testament are thus considered anti-Semites.

The same SANHEDRIN,  the same Hassidic Pharisee's who are Chabad Lubavitch, and they Now control Berlin, Paris, China, Russia, London and Washington DC and the Sanhedrin anti-Christ, as well as Judeo-Churchinsanity

Who Will Be Deported Next?

Today, Knesset wants Holocaust reductionists persecuted and shipped to Israel. But what of tomorrow? Considering the much greater offense of "Christian anti-Semitism," it is inevitable that Knesset should also declare such anti-Semites to be criminals.

It is highly significant that Christ, describing last days' persecution of believers, states that such oppression will originate with evil Jewish leaders and that Christians may be deported to Israel for prosecution. He said they will "deliver you to the courts (Sanhedrin), and you will be flogged in the synagogues…" (Mark 13:9, NAS).

Yet according to ADL/B'nai B'rith's "Report on Global Anti-Semitism," ghostwritten for the U.S. State Department's new Dept. of Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith says that not only are those who claim Jews killed Christ 2,000 years ago anti-Semitic but so are all "strong" critics of Jews, matters Jewish, Jewish leaders, and the state of Israel.

This means that not only courageous Christians and pastors but also talk show hosts, publishers, anti-war activists, etc. will be liable for imprisonment or deportation. This is not a theoretical danger; it has already happened to those who reduced the number of Holocaust victims.

We Must Identify our Enemy

ADL/Knesset will not be restrained by protests to the U.S. Department of Immigration, the Supreme Court, or Germany. They will, however, be thwarted by massive public awareness of their role in the creation of hate crime/deportation laws.

This can be done through talk shows, the Internet, letters to the editor, calls to Congress, and discussions in conservative groups and Sunday school classes. Documentation of ADL invention of hate laws is found in my video, "Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians," and at www.truthtellers.org or www.adl.org.

ADL's (Beware ADL is Aholibah and is not Dan Amaraka Aholah of the Hassidim of Sanhedrin, the RED Sofiet Talmudic Chabad Vipers of HELL)  program to destroy Christian civilization can only go forward deceptively, behind the scenes. If patriotic Americans only react to the effects of ADL initiatives yet do not identify the source of these evils, ADL's power is not curtailed. It is not enough to chop off tentacles of evil ADL legislation because, like the proverbial octopus, ADL continues working in Congress and the media, regenerating assaults on freedom.

Both are WHORES, Aholibah and her sister Aholah

We must go to the very eye of this anti-Christ beast, courageously raising understanding of ADL/Knesset (Sanhedrin) inspiration behind hate laws and resulting deportation demands. Only by massive public awareness of the ADL/Knesset threat can our nation resist increasing global pressure to submit to international hate crimes jurisdiction.

Evil Jewish leaders over the past century have, as "God's chosen people," enjoyed immunity from criticism by most evangelicals. That must change. It's time for the unholy alliance between Christians and such leadership to end. If it doesn't, the monster we have helped create will devour us.

________

Sanhedrin

Beware of the scribes and the Pharisees

Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin

 

Folio 56a

THE WHOLE DAY [OF THE TRIAL] THE WITNESSES ARE EXAMINED BY MEANS OF A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE DIVINE NAME, THUS, 'MAY JOSE SMITE JOSE.'1  WHEN THE TRIAL WAS FINISHED, THE ACCUSED WAS NOT EXECUTED ON THIS EVIDENCE, BUT ALL PERSONS WERE REMOVED [FROM COURT], AND THE CHIEF WITNESS WAS TOLD, 'STATE LITERALLY WHAT YOU HEARD. THEREUPON HE DID SO, [USING THE DIVINE NAME]. THE JUDGES THEN AROSE AND RENT THEIR GARMENTS, WHICH RENT WAS NOT TO BE RESEWN. THE SECOND WITNESS STATED; I TOO HAVE HEARD THUS' [BUT NOT UTTERING THE DIVINE NAME], AND THE THIRD SAYS: 'I TOO HEARD THUS'.

GEMARA. It has been taught: [The blasphemer is not punished] unless he 'blesses' the Name, by the Name.2  Whence do we know this? — Samuel said: The Writ sayeth, And he that blasphemeth [nokeb] the name of the Lord … when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death.3  How do you know that the word nokeb4  [used in the Hebrew] means a 'blessing'? — From the verse, How shall I curse [Ekkob]5  whom God hath not cursed;6  whilst the formal prohibition is contained in the verse, thou shalt not revile God.7  But perhaps it means 'to pierce,'8  as it is written, [So Jehoiada the priest took a chest,] and bored [wa-yikkob]9  a hole in the lid of it,10  the formal injunction against this being the verses, Ye shall destroy the names of them [idols] out of that place. Ye shall not do so unto the Lord your God?11  — The Name must be 'blessed' by the Name, which is absent here. But perhaps the text refers to the putting of two slips of parchment, each bearing the Divine Name, together, and piercing them both? — In that case one Name is pierced after the other.12  But perhaps it prohibits the engraving of the Divine Name on the Point of a knife and piercing therewith [the Divine Name written on a slip of parchment]? — In that case, the point of the knife pierces, not the Divine Name. But perhaps it refers to the pronunciation of the ineffable Name, as it is written, And Moses and Aaron took these men which are expressed [nikkebu]13  by their names;14  the formal prohibition being contained in the verse, Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God?15  — Firstly, the Name must be 'blessed' by the Name, which is absent here; and secondly, it is a prohibition in the form of a positive command, which is not deemed to be a prohibition at all.16  An alternative answer is this: The Writ saith, [And the Israelitish woman's son] blasphemed wa-yikkob17  [and cursed],18  proving that blasphemy [nokeb] denotes cursing. But perhaps it teaches that both offences must be perpetrated?19  You cannot think so, because it is written, Bring forth him that hath cursed,20  and not 'him that hath blasphemed and cursed', proving that one offence only is alluded to.

Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin.21  It would have been sufficient to say], 'A man, etc:' What is taught by the expression any man?22  The inclusion of heathens, to whom blasphemy is prohibited just as to Israelites, and they are executed by decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by decapitation.23

Now, is [the prohibition of blasphemy to heathens] deduced from this verse? But it is deduced from another, viz., The Lord, referring to the 'blessing' of the Divine Name.24  — R. Isaac the smith25  replied; This phrase ['any man'] is necessary only as teaching the inclusion of substitutes of God's name,26  and the Baraitha is taught in accordance with R. Meir's views For it has been taught: Any man that curseth his God shall bear his sin.27  Why is this written? Has it not already been stated, And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death?28  Because it is stated, And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death, I might think that death is meted out only when the ineffable Name is employed. Whence do I know that all substitutes [of the ineffable Name] are included [in this law]? From the verse, Any man that curseth his God — shewing culpability for any manner of blasphemy [even without uttering the Name, since the Name is not mentioned in this sentence]: this is the view of R. Meir. But the Sages maintain: [Blasphemy] with use of the ineffable Name, is punishable by death: with the employment of substitutes, it is the object of an injunction. [but not punishable by death].

This view [of R. Isaac the smith] conflicts with that of R. Miyasha; for R. Miyasha said: If a heathen [son of Noah] blasphemed, employing substitutes of the ineffable Name, he is in the opinion of the Sages punishable by death. Why so? — Because it is written, as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land [when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death].29  This teaches that only the stranger [i.e.. a proselyte], and the native [i.e., a natural born Israelite] must utter the ineffable Name; but the heathen is punishable even for a substitute only. But how does R. Meir interpret the verse, 'as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land'? — It teaches that the stranger and citizen are stoned, but a heathen is decapitated. (Goyim Gentile) For I would think, since they are included [in the prohibition], they are included [in the manner of execution too]: hence we are taught otherwise. Now how does R. Isaac the smith interpret the verse, 'as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land', on the view of the Rabbis?30  — It teaches that only a stranger and a native must revile the Name by the Name, but for a heathen this is unnecessary. Why does the Torah state any man?31  — The Torah employed normal human speech.32

Our Rabbis taught: seven precepts were the sons of Noah commanded: social laws;33  to refrain from blasphemy, idolatry; adultery; bloodshed; robbery; and eating flesh cut from a living animal.34


footnotes 

 
  1. The witnesses, in giving testimony, do not state that they heard the accused say, 'May He slay himself', uttering the actual divine name, but use the word 'Jose' as a substitute for the divine name. 'Jose' is chosen as a substitute, because it contains four letters, like the actual Tetragrammaton, which must have been used by the blasphemer for him to be punished. Moreover, the numerical value of 'Jose' is the same as of Elohim [81]. According to Levy, s.v. [H], the first Jose [H] stands for Jesus ([H], son), and the second is an abbreviation of [H], Joseph, the Father, by which, however, God was to be understood. The witnesses were accordingly asked whether the accused in his blasphemy had set Jesus above God. (R. Joshua b. Karha, the author of this saying, lived at a time when Judeo-Christians ascribed more power to Jesus than to God.)
  2. As in the Mishnah, 'Jose strike Jose'. 'Bless' is here a euphemism for curse, and is so in the whole of the ensuing discussion.
  3. Lev. XXIV, 16. The repetition shows that the Divine Name must be cursed by the Divine Name.
  4. [H]
  5. [H]
  6. Num. XXIII, 8.
  7. Ex. XXII, 27.
  8. I.e., it is a capital offence to pierce the Divine Name, written on a slip of parchment, and thus destroy it.
  9. [H]
  10. II Kings XII, 10.
  11. Deut. XII, 3f. The interpretation is based on the juxtaposition of the two verses; v. Mak. 22a.
  12. The knife passes successively from one slip to the other, but one Name does not pierce the other.
  13. uceb
  14. Num. 1, 17.
  15. Deut. VI, 13, which is interpreted as a prohibition against the unnecessary utterance of His Name.
  16. The statement, Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God, though implying abstention from something, is nevertheless given as a positive command, but punishment is imposed for the violation only of a direct negative precept.
  17. [H]
  18. Lev. XXIV, 11.
  19. I.e., only he who both blasphemes, that is, utters the ineffable Name, and curses it, is executed.
  20. Ibid. XXIV, 14.
  21. Ibid. XXIV, 15.
  22. Lit., 'A man, a man', Heb. ish ish, [H].
  23. The only place where death is explicitly decreed for non-Israelites is in Gen. IX, 6: Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed. It is a general law, applicable to all, having been given in the pre-Abrahamic era; his blood shall be shed must refer to the sword, the only death whereby blood is shed.
  24. V. infra 56b. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, of every tree of the garden, thou mayest freely eat. Gen. II, 16. Every word or phrase in this verse is separately interpreted, the Lord teaching the prohibition of blasphemy to a Noachide.
  25. In the Talmudic period the Rabbi was an honorary official; consequently, he had to have a private occupation e.g., R. Joshua, who came into conflict with R. Gamaliel, was a blacksmith, (Ber. 28a.) others translate, charcoal-burner.
  26. I.e., even if only a substitute was employed in blasphemy, the death penalty is incurred.
  27. Lev. XXIV, 15
  28. Ibid. 16.
  29. Ibid.
  30. That a heathen too must use the ineffable Name for incurring punishment.
  31. This is a difficulty For R. Isaac and R. Miyasha, as they explain the opinions of the Sages. They both maintain that the culpability of a heathen is deduced from And the Lord (God commanded etc.) When employing substitutes, his culpability, in the view of R. Miyasha is deduced from as well the stranger etc.; Whilst R. Isaac denies that it is punishable at all. Hence the difficulty, why the repetition ish ish, a man, a man?
  32. I.e., no particular significance attaches to the repetition, it being the usual idiom.
  33. I.e., to establish courts of justice, or, perhaps, to observe social justice (Nahmanides on Gen. XXXIV, 13): Hast. Dict. (s.v. Noachian precepts) translates 'obedience to authority'.
  34. These commandments may be regarded as the foundations of all human and moral progress. Judaism has both a national and a universal outlook in life. In the former sense it is particularistic, setting up a people distinct and separate from others by its peculiar religious law. But in the latter, it recognises that moral progress and its concomitant Divine love and approval are the privilege and obligation of all mankind. And hence the Talmud lays down the seven Noachian precepts, by the observance of which all mankind may attain spiritual perfection, and without which moral death must inevitably ensue. That perhaps is the idea underlying the assertion (passim) that a heathen is liable to death for the neglect of any of these. The last mentioned is particularly instructive as showing the great importance attached to the humane treatment of animals; so much so, that it is declared to be fundamental to human righteousness.

     

Sanhedrin 56b

R. Hanania b. Gamaliel said: Also not to partake of the blood drawn from a living animal. R. Hidka added emasculation. R. Simeon added sorcery. R. Jose said: The heathens were prohibited everything that is mentioned in the section on sorcery. viz., There shall not be found among you any one, that maketh his son or daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them [sc. the heathens in Canaan] out from before thee.1  Now, [the Almighty] does not punish without first prohibiting.2  R. Eleazar added the forbidden mixture [in plants and animals]: now, they are permitted to wear garments of mixed fabrics [of wool and linen] and sow diverse seeds together; they are forbidden only to hybridize heterogeneous animals and graft trees of different kinds.

Whence do we know this? — R. Johanan answered: The Writ saith: And the Lord God commanded the man saying, of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat.3  And [He] commanded, refers to [the observance of] social laws, and thus it is written, For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment.4  The Lord — is [a prohibition against] blasphemy, and thus it is written, and he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death.5  God — is [an injunction against] idolatry, and thus it is written, Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.6  The man — refers to bloodshed [murder], and thus it is written, Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed.7  Saying — refers to adultery, and thus it is written, They say, If a man put away his wife, and she go from him, and became another man's.8  Of every tree of the garden — but not of robbery.9  Thou mayest freely eat — but not flesh cut from a living animal.10

When R. Isaac came,11  he taught a reversed interpretation. And He commanded — refers to idolatry; God [Heb. elohim] to social law. Now 'God' may rightly refer to social laws, as it is written, And the master of the house shall be brought unto elohim [i.e., the judges] (The Seventy Elders who sit on the seat of Moses) .12  But how can 'and He commanded' connote a prohibition of idolatry? — R. Hisda and R. Isaac b. Abdimi-one cited the verse, They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made them a molten calf, etc.13  And the other cited, Ephraim is oppressed and broken in judgment, because he willingly walked after the commandment.14  Wherein do they differ? — In respect of a heathen who made an idol but did not worship it: On the view [that the prohibition of idolatry is derived from] they have made them a molten calf, guilt is incurred as soon as the idol is made [even before it is worshipped]; but according to the opinion that it is from, because he willingly walked after the commandment, there is no liability until the heathen actually follows and worships it. Raba objected: Does any scholar maintain that a heathen is liable to punishment for making an idol even if he did not worship it? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish Court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen; but those for which a Jewish Court inflicts no capital penalty on Jewish delinquents are not forbidden to him.15  Now what does this exclude? Presumably the case of a heathen who made an idol without worshipping it?16  R. Papa answered: No. It excludes the embracing and kissing of idols.17  Of which idols do you say this? Is it of those whose normal worship is in this manner; but in that case he is surely liable to death? — Hence it excludes the embracing and kissing of idols which are not usually worshipped thus.

'Social laws.' Were then the children of Noah bidden to observe these? Surely it has been taught: The Israelites were given ten precepts at Marah, seven of which had already been accepted by the children of Noah, to which were added at Marah social laws, the Sabbath, and honouring one's parents; 'Social laws,' for it is written, There [sc. at Marah] he made for them a statute and an ordinance;18  'the Sabbath and honouring one's parents'. for it is written, As the Lord thy God commanded thee!19  — R. Nahman replied in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: The addition at Marah was only in respect of an assembly, witnesses, and formal admonition.20  If so, why say 'to which were added social laws'?21  — But Raba replied thus: The addition was only in respect of the laws of fines.22  But even so, should it not have been said, 'additions were made in the social laws'? — But R. Aha b. Jacob answered thus: The Baraitha informs us that they were commanded to set up law courts in every district and town. But were not the sons of Noah likewise commanded to do this? Surely it has been taught: Just as the Israelites were ordered to set up law courts in every district and town, so were the sons of Noah likewise enjoined to set up law courts in every district and town! — But Raba answered thus: The author of this Baraitha [which states that social laws were added at Marah] is a Tanna of the School of Manasseh, who omitted social laws and blasphemy23  [from the list of Noachian precepts] and substituted emasculation and the forbidden mixture [in plants, ploughing. etc.].23  For a Tanna of the School of Manasseh taught: The sons of Noah were given seven precepts. viz., [prohibition of] idolatry, adultery, murder, robbery, flesh cut from a living animal, emasculation and forbidden mixtures. R. Judah said: Adam was prohibited idolatry only, for it is written, And the Lord God commanded Adam.24  R. Judah b. Bathyra maintained: He was forbidden blasphemy too. Some add social laws. With whom does the following statement of Rab Judah in the name of Rab agree: viz., [God said to Adam,] I am God, do not curse Me; I am God, do not exchange Me for another; I am God, let My fear be upon you?25  — This agrees with the last mentioned [who adds social laws to the list].

Now, what is the standpoint of the Tanna of the School of Manasseh? If he interprets the verse, And the Lord God commanded etc. [as interpreted above], he should include these two [social laws and blasphemy] also, and if he does not, whence does he derive the prohibition of the rest? — In truth, he does not accept the interpretation of the verse, 'And the Lord God commanded etc., but maintains that each of these [which he includes] is separately stated: Idolatry and adultery.

Footnotes

  1. Deut. XVIII, 10ff.
  2. Therefore, since it is stated that they are being expelled as a punishment for these sins, they must first have been warned (i.e., prohibited) against them.
  3. Gen. II, 16.
  4. Gen. XVIII, 19. Thus 'command' relates to justice and judgment.
  5. Lev. XXIV, 16 — 'The Lord' being used in connection with blasphemy.
  6. Ex. XX, 3.
  7. Gen. IX, 6.
  8. Jer. III, 1. Thus 'saying' is used in connection with adultery.
  9. Since it was necessary to authorize Adam to eat of the trees of the garden, it follows that without such authorisation — i.e., when something belongs to another — it is forbidden.
  10. By interpreting thus: Thou mayest eat that which is now ready for eating, but not whilst the animal is alive. It is perhaps remarkable that a verse, the literal meaning of which is obviously permission to enjoy, should be interpreted as a series of prohibitions. Yet it is quite in keeping with the character of the Talmud: freedom to enjoy must be limited by moral and social considerations, and indeed only attains its highest value when so limited. Cf. Ab. VI, 2: No man is free but he who labours in the Torah.
  11. V. p. 361, n. 5.
  12. Ex. XXII, 7. The root idea of 'elohim' is power, majesty.
  13. Ex. XXXII, 8.
  14. Hos. V, 11, referring to idolatry; thus in both cases 'command' is used in connection with idolatry.
  15. V. Mishnah 60b.
  16. For which a Jew is not punished by death.
  17. Teaching that these are not punishable.
  18. Ex. XV, 25. Ordinance (Heb. mishpat) refers to social law.
  19. Deut. V, 16. This occurs in the fifth commandment of the second Decalogue. Similar words are used in the fourth commandment: therefore the Lord thy God commanded thee to keep the sabbath day. In both cases then there is a reference to some previous event, shewn by the use of the past tense: commanded thee. Now the second Decalogue, though spoken by Moses towards the end of his life in the plains of Moab many years after the first at Sinai, was nevertheless a repetition thereof. Therefore this reference back must have been made in the first promulgation also, and can only relate to Marah, where, as stated above, 'he made for them a statute and an ordinance', i.e., gave certain laws to the the Israelites.
  20. I.e., that Justice should be meted out by an 'assembly'. viz., a Sanhedrin; that an accusation was to be attested by at least two witnesses, and that a formal warning or admonition was to be given to the accused before he committed his offence, as otherwise he was not liable to the prescribed penalty. But the sons of Noah, though bidden to observe civil laws, were not bound by these regulations.
  21. Since the addition was only in the method of procedure, but not in actual content.
  22. E.g., Deut. XXII, 19, 29, where a slanderer of a woman's honour is ordered to pay 100 silver shekels to her father, and a seducer of a virgin 50 silver shekels. These payments are not regarded as equitable indemnifications against loss sustained, but as fines for reprehensible acts. These laws were wanting in the civil code of the sons of Noah, and only these commands added at Marah.
  23. The text employs abbreviations for these commands.
  24. Which means that He commanded him to remember His Godhead, and not to reject it for a different deity.
  25. 'Let my fear be upon you' is an exhortation to dispense justice uprightly, without fear of man.

 

The Goal, Destroy Christianity, Christ Jesus whom they reject for the "Robber"

Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin

 

Folio 57a

for it is written, The earth also was corrupt before God;  and a Tanna of the School of R. Ishmael taught: Wherever corruption is mentioned, it must refer to immorality and idolatry.  'Immorality.' as it is written, for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.  'Idolatry,' for it is written, Lest ye corrupt yourselves and make you a graven image, etc.  And the other teacher [who deduces this from the verse, and the Lord God commanded etc.]?  He maintains that this verse [sc. the earth also etc.] merely describes their way of living.  'Bloodshed', as it is written, Whoso sheddeth man's blood, etc.  And the other?  — This verse [he will maintain] merely teaches the manner of execution.  Robbery, for it is written, As the wild herbs have I given you all things;10  upon which R. Levi commented: as the wild herbs, but not as the cultivated herbs.11  And the other?12  — He will hold that this verse is written to permit animal flesh,13  [but not to prohibit robbery]. Flesh cut from the living animal, as it is written, But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.14  And the other?15  — He may hold that this verse teaches that flesh cut from live reptiles is permitted.16  Emasculation, for it is written, Bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.17  And the other?18  — He may regard this merely as a blessing.19  Forbidden mixture, as it is said, Of fowls after their kind.20  And the other?21  — He will maintain that this was merely for the sake of mating.22

R. Joseph said, The scholars23  stated: A heathen is executed for the violation of three precepts — Mnemonic G Sh R—24 viz., adultery, bloodshed, and blasphemy. R. Shesheth objected: Now bloodshed is rightly included, since it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed;25  but whence do we know the others? If they are derived from bloodshed,26  the other four should also be included; whilst if their inclusion is taught by the extending phrase any man,27  should not idolatry too be included?28  But R. Shesheth said thus: The scholars stated, A heathen is executed for the violation of four precepts [including idolatry]. But is a heathen executed for idolatry? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen. This implies that they are merely forbidden, but their violation is not punished by death! — R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: Their prohibition is their death sentence.29

R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples of Rab maintained: A heathen is executed for the violation of the seven Noachian laws; the Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it applies to all. Now is a heathen executed for robbery? Has it not been taught: 'With respect to robbery — if one stole or robbed30  or [seized] a beautiful woman,31  or [committed] similar offences,32  if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean33  against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'?34  But if robbery is a capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? — Because the second clause wishes to state, 'but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained,' therefore the former clause reads, '[theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept.'35  But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: 'For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty'?36  — How else could that clause have been taught? Could he state, 'forbidden' … 'permitted'? Surely it has been taught; A Cuthean and a [Jewish] shepherd of small cattle [sheep, goats, etc.]37  need neither be rescued [from a pit] nor may they be thrown [therein]!38 'And similar acts.' To what can this apply in the case of robbery? — R. Aha b. Jacob answered: To a worker in a vineyard [who eats of the grapes]. When so? If his is the finishing work, it is permitted?39  If it is not the finishing work, is it not actual robbery?40 — But R. Papa said: This applies to [the theft of] an article worth less than a perutah.41  But if so, why say that such robbery of a Jew by a Cuthean must not be kept: does he not forgive him?42  — Though he later forgives him, he is grieved when it occurs [therefore it is prohibited] — But how can you say that such robbery by one Cuthean from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a Cuthean does not forgive,43  is it not actual theft? — But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered; It applies to the withholding of a labourer's wage.44  One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted.45  To what can 'a similar act' apply in the case of a beautiful woman? — When R. Dimi came,46  he said in the name of R. Eleazar in the name of R. Hanina: To a heathen who allotted a bondwoman to his slave [for concubinage] and then took her for himself, for this he is executed.47

'A similar act', however, is not taught with reference to murder.48  Abaye said: If it should be, however, that it is so taught, it would be in accordance with R. Jonathan b. Saul. For it has been taught; If one was pursuing his neighbour to slay him, and the latter could have saved himself by maiming a limb [of the pursuer, e.g., his foot], and did not thus save himself [but killed him instead],

Footnotes

  1. Gen. VI, II
  2. And once they were punished for these offences, they must first have been admonished against them.

Part 2: Address by the Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson,

He, has put in the heart of the President of this country ("The king's heart is in the hand of the L-rd," cf. Proverbs 21:1) the desire to proclaim and publicize to all the citizens of this country - 

with the approval of the representatives of the people of the land

 

 

  1. Ibid. 'Corrupted his way' connotes immorality; cf. the way of a man with a maid. Prov. XXX, 19.
  2. Deut. IV, 16.
  3. How does he utilize this latter verse?
  4. But is not intended to imply a prohibition.
  5. Gen. IX, 6.
  6. I.e., who deduces it from the verse, all the Lord commanded.
  7. I.e., by the sword, v. p. 380 n. 5; but the fact of execution is taught elsewhere.
  8. Ibid. 3.
  9. I.e., only as that which grows wild, without any owners; but not as that which is cultivated, hence owned by someone. This proves that robbery was forbidden them.
  10. V. n. 8.
  11. Which was prohibited to Adam, v. infra 59b.
  12. Ibid. 4. 'Flesh with the blood thereof' means flesh cut from the living animal.
  13. V. n. 8.
  14. V. infra 59a, b.
  15. Ibid. This, of course, is a direct negation of emasculation.
  16. V. p. 386, n. 8,
  17. But it is not intended to convey any prohibition.
  18. Ibid. VI, 20; hence different species are not to be crossed.
  19. V. p. 386, n. 8.
  20. It being easier to mate with the same species than with another; but no prohibition is implied thereby.
  21. The term be Rab does not necessarily mean the school presided over by Rab, though it may have that meaning occasionally. In one sense, it connotes the school founded by him, but lasting many generations after his lifetime. In another, it denotes schools in general. In this very instance, the views attributed to be Rab conflict with the teaching of Rab, Rab Judah, and all his disciples (Weiss. Dor II, p. 206.)
  22. [H]: a mnemonic is given to facilitate the remembering of the subjects of a discussion. Here it stands for Gilluy 'Arayoth — adultery; Shefikuth damin — murder; and birkath ha-shem — blasphemy.
  23. Gen. IX, 6.
  24. That as bloodshed was forbidden on pain of death, so were the others too.
  25. Heb. [H]. Lev. XXIV, 15: Any man ([H]) that curseth his God shall bear his sin. Ibid. XVIII, 6: No man ([H]) shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness. In both cases one referring to blasphemy, and the other to incest, the repetition of ish extends the law to embrace heathens too.
  26. Lev. XX, 2: Whosoever he be (ish ish ) of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed to Moloch (i.e., engages in idol worship); he shall surely be put to death. The repetition then, here too, should extend the death penalty for idolatry to heathens.
  27. I.e., in speaking of heathens, when the Tanna teaches that they are forbidden to do something, he ipso facto teaches that it is punishable by death; for only in speaking of Jews is it necessary to distinguish between prohibition and punishment.
  28. Stole (ganab) refers to secret stealing, robbed (gazal), to stealing by open violence.
  29. In war, v. Deut. XXI, 10-14 — a species of robbery. [This is the only possible and correct rendering of the text, contra Goldschmidt. Cf. Tosef A.Z.]
  30. Acts which are not actual robbery, but partake of its nature.
  31. 'Cuthean' (Samaritan) was here substituted by the censor for the original goy (heathen).
  32. [I.e., though it is forbidden to rob the heathen (v. Yad, Genebah I, 2; VI, 8), the offence was non-actionable. For reason, v. B. K. (Sonc. ed.) note on Mishnah 37b.]
  33. But actually it is punishable too. [This is merely a survival of old Semitic tribal law that regarded theft and robbery as a crime against the state, and consequently punishable by death. V. Muller, D. H., Hammurabi, 88]
  34. Thus the Tanna does refer to punishment; since then he omits a reference to punishment in the clause under discussion, it shows that the heathen is not executed for robbery. In the whole of this discussion the punishment referred to is death.
  35. Both are regarded as robbers the latter because they permit their charges to graze in other people's fields.
  36. One need neither exert oneself to save them from death, nor may one encompass it. This, of course, is theoretical only, v. p. 388, n. 6. Not a few of these harsh utterances (where they do not reflect the old Semitic tribal law, v. p. 388. n. 7) were the natural result of Jewish persecution by the Romans, and must be understood in that light. In actual practice, these dicta were certainly never acted upon, and it is significant that a commission of Roman officers, after investigating Jewish law in its relation to Gentiles, took exception only to two laws, one relating to the damage done by a goring ox, and the other permitting a Jew the use of property stolen from a Gentile. R. Gamaliel repealed this latter law. (B.K. 38a: Sifre Deut. 344.) Hence, reverting to the discussion, the Tanna could not have stated that the murder of a Cuthean by a Jew is permissible, therefore he is forced to speak of punishment.
  37. E.g., the gathering in of the grapes. Deut. XXIII, 25 is interpreted by the Rabbis as referring to work in connection with the finishing touch given to the produce.
  38. Not merely bordering thereon.
  39. A small coin, one-eighth of the Roman as.
  40. One does not mind such a trifle, and readily forgives it.
  41. Even such a trifle, v. infra 59a.
  42. This only borders on a robbery, for actual robbery means depriving a person of what he already possesses
  43. I.e., non-actionable.
  44. R. Dimi was a Palestinian Amora of the fourth century, who travelled to and fro between, Babylon and Palestine, and was very zealous in transmitting the teachings of Palestine Scholars to his colleagues in Babylon (v. J. E. IV, 603; cf. p. 361, n. 5, supra.
  45. This, though not actual robbery, is similar to it.
  46. A deed is either actual murder or not. Even unwitting murder is murder, though the Almighty shewed mercy by sparing the murderer.

 

Sanhedrin 57b

he is executed for his death.

R. Jacob b. Aha found it written in the scholars'  Book of Aggada:  A heathen is executed on the ruling of one judge, on the testimony of one witness, without a formal warning, on the evidence of a man, but not of a woman, even if he [the witness] be a relation. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. Whence do we know all this? — Rab Judah answered: The Bible saith, And surely your blood of your lives will I require;  this shows that even one judge [may try a heathen].  At the hand of every living thing will I require it: even without an admonition having been given;  And at the hand of man: even on the testimony of one witness;  at the hand of man:  but not at the hand [i.e., on the testimony] of a woman; his brother: teaching that even a relation may testify. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. What is R. Ishmael's reason? Because it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man within [another] man, shall his blood be shed.  What is a man within another man? — An embryo in his mother's womb.10  But the first Tanna [who excludes the murder of an embryo from capital punishment] is a Tanna of the school of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation. He connects the [second] 'man' with the latter half of the sentence, and interprets thus: Whoso sheddeth man's blood, within man [i.e., within him], shall his blood be shed. Now, how can man's blood be shed, and yet be retained within him? By strangulation.

R. Hamnuna objected: Now, is not a [heathen] woman commanded [to keep the social laws]? Surely it is written, For I know him, that he will command his sons and his household [which includes the womenfolk] after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord to exercise charity, and judgment?11  — He raised the objection, and he answered it himself: he would command 'his sons' to exercise judgment; 'his daughters' to perform charity.

R. Awia the elder said to R. Papa: Let us say that a heathen woman who committed murder must not be executed, since it is written, at the hand of every man [who committed murder] etc. implying,12  'but not at the hand of woman'? — He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: Whoso sheddeth man's blood implies whosoever it be [even a woman]. Let us say that a heathen woman who committed adultery is not executed, since it is written, therefore shall a man forsake [his father and mother, and cleave to his wife], implying12  that a man [must cleave], but not a woman? — He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: The verse, And they shall be as one flesh, reassimilated them to each other [making the law of fidelity applicable to both].

Our Rabbis taught: [A man, a man shall not approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness.13  It would have been sufficient to state,] A man shall not approach etc. What is taught by the repetition, A man, a man? — The extension of the law to heathens, that they too are forbidden incest [including adultery]. Now is this deduced from this verse; is it rather not deduced from a different text, viz., [And the lord God commanded…] saying, which refers to adultery?14  — The latter text refers to adultery with a woman of their own [i.e., with a heathen married woman]; the former to adultery with one of ours [i.e., a Jewish married woman], for the second clause teaches: If he committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law. With regard to what is this?15  — R. Nahman said in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: With regard to an assembly, witnesses and formal admonition.16  Is a Jewess then of less account?17  But R. Johanan answered thus: It is with regard to a betrothed Jewish maiden,18  whose violation by heathen law is not a capital offence;19  hence they are judged by Jewish law.

But if their offence was against a fully married woman, are they judged according to their law? Surely it has been taught: 'If a heathen committed adultery with a [Jewish] betrothed maiden, he is stoned; with a fully married woman, he is strangled.' Now if we judged them according to the law pertaining to them, should he not be decapitated? — R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: By a 'married woman' this Baraitha means one whose huppah ceremony20  has been performed, but without the marriage being consummated. Since by their law her violation is not a capital offence, they are judged by ours. For R. Hanina taught: They recognise the inviolability of a woman whose union has been consummated, but not if she merely entered the huppah without the union having been consummated. It has been taught in agreement with R. Johanan: All prohibited [sexual] relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens, but those for which a Jewish Beth din (Temple)  does not impose death are permitted to heathens; this is R. Meir's view. But the Sages maintain: There are many relationships21  for which a Jewish Beth din does not impose death, which are nevertheless forbidden to a Gentile. If a heathen committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law; if with a heathen woman, he is judged according to heathen law. The only difference that this makes is with respect to a betrothed maiden.22  But should not the Tanna include a woman whose huppah ceremony has been performed without the marriage being consummated? — The teacher of this Baraitha is the Tanna of the college of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation, and by both codes [Jewish and heathen] this last-mentioned offence is punished by strangulation.

Now, is R. Meir of the opinion that all relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens? Surely it has been taught: A proselyte,

 

  1. Yet this cannot be regarded as real murder, and hence may be called 'a similar act'. But the sages dispute this, and maintain that he is not executed at all.
  2. V. p. 387, n, 7. It may also mean the School of Rab (Bacher. Agad. Bab. Amor. p. 2).
  3. Aggadah (or Haggadah, from nagad, to declare), means the whole non-legal portion of Jewish learning. Here however, an actual law is cited from the Book of Aggadah. In the T. J. and Midrashim, many statements cited in the T. B. as being from the Book of Aggadah of the schools, are those cited under the name of Noachian precepts. Hence it is possible that the reference is to a collection of laws relating to Gentiles, and in order to distinguish it from specifically Jewish laws, it was called the Book of Aggadah (Weiss, Dor, III, p. 158).
  4. Gen. IX, 5.
  5. The interpretation is based on the use of the singular, 'I' will require.
  6. This is based on the extending word 'every'.
  7. This is based on the singular.
  8. Not the same phrase in Heb. as the preceding one.
  9. Lit. rendering of Gen. IX, 6.
  10. This law was directed against the Roman practice of prenatal murder. Weiss, Dor, II, 22.
  11. Ibid. XVIII, 19. Why then should a woman's testimony be inadmissible?
  12. According to Rab Judah's exegesis.
  13. Lit. rendering of Lev. XVIII, 6.
  14. V. p. 383.
  15. Since by the Noachian Law also he is liable to death.
  16. He must be tried by a full Sanhedrin; he cannot be convicted on the testimony of less than two witnesses, and he must have been formally admonished before committing the offence.
  17. I.e., is he dealt with more leniently because his offence was against a Jewess? For when his offence is against a heathen, these are unnecessary.
  18. V. p. 333, n. 3; p. 337, n. 5.
  19. As they do not regard her as married until the actual consumation of the nuptials.
  20. V. p. 333, n. 3.
  21. The Gaon of Wilna deletes 'many': Maimonides likewise does not include it in his text. Actually, the dispute of the Sages and R. Meir is only in reference to a half sister by one's mother.
  22. Tosef. 'A.Z. IX. Since heathen law does not recognise this as a capital offence, he is judged by our law. This statement supports R. Johanan's contention

 

 

Alert ! Alert! Alert!

Keep in mind......

e-mail from the Hassidic anti-Christ Pharisaic Chabad Lovtobitch (Lubavitch) Sanhedrin of the Dragon....rabid rib-eye Dov Stein

דואר אלקטרוני info@beith-din.com          אתר אינטרנט www.beith-din.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Southern American Marketing, Inc. [mailto:robert@samliquidation.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
August 16, 2005 9:06 PM
To: Dov
Subject:

Dov SSStein
IT is not chamas who you control who you worry about....IT IS JESUS the Christ GOD and his Father you so tremble.
Very soon your Moshiach and Sanhedrin and your dragon is cast into the pit with death and hell the Covenant you have made to yourselves

His Reply

We authentic Jews will treat CHAMAS (Hamas)  wonderful when we get rid from your christian influence during 2000 years of murdering and thethts. Soon the CHAMAS will treat you christians as it did 11/9 (9-11-2001)

8-16-2005

IW
They will come to you before as 11/9
The only chance that you will remain  is the treatment that we the jews will the CHAMAS
 

 

From: Southern American Marketing, Inc. [mailto:robert@samliquidation.com]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 6:32 PM
To: Dov
Subject:

Dov Stein
 
hahah neat manuever
 
14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.
 
So it is time to have your Hamas to "Proceed with your all engulfing "TERROR"
 
Lob those missiles on the "Lesser Brethren"
 
and send in Bigboy haha Bushitler
and then double cross him
 
hahahha gotta hand it to you den of Vipers, you are following the Prophecy of Jesus the Christ 100% and know it not
 
OH well IW...ITSREALHELL Warner here has told you, REPENT or perish forever, Don Stein

 

http://www.ukar.org/gore10.html

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts.  The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory

_____

E-mail from Dov Stein, Sanhedrin 1-26-2006

From: Southern American Marketing, Inc. [mailto:robert@samliquidation.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 6:10 PM
To: Dov
Subject:

well lookie, lookie Dov Stein, the Sanhedrin has pulled off their Hamas Victory, Now all you need is more "Terror" to Justify reinvadeing the Gaza and begin Noahide Enforcement to your strange gods who are no God the Creator, but the murderer from the beginning, that Old serpent the dragon who has given you your power and seat and authority. But lo, and alas It is very, very Temporary, where will you hide on that Great and Terrible Day of the Lord's wrath for your iniquities, and blasphemy and theft's and murders? Repent in Jesus the Christ Mighty Name, Dov Stein

 

From: ??
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: RE:

Hamas is better. Now we will have the oportunity to through all of them back to Saudi Arabia what was impossible with Fatach.

____

all the Kings of the earth are deceived

 

_________

Judge Roy Moore another shemsham of Shame

Letter to pastor of the church I attended at one time


 
 
To Pastor Paul Wilde.
 
Be sure, while you have Judge Roy Moore, there to ask him why the monument had the "Moral" Law written upon it.
 
Ask Mr. Moore, if he is aware of House Joint Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14. Made by the 102nd Congress of the United States of America. A Very real Law, By the Congress, and the executive.
 
The law which states:
 
102d CONGRESS
 
1st Session
 
H. J. RES. 104
 
JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
 
HJ 104 EH
 

102d CONGRESS
 
1st Session
 
H. J. RES. 104
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
 
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;
 
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;
 
Now, If Mr Moore says he is aware of their Law which is Solely derived from the Babylonian Talmud, the Most Holy Book of the jews, ask why he has not spoken out loudly about this Blasphemous Treasonous Law of satan
 
For the Talmud clearly states , that Jesus who is Christ, is a son of a whore and a ROMAN soldier, and is in hell boiling in human excrement
 
and that, Tractate Sanhedrin 57a. any who breaks even one of these laws will be decapitated.
 
Being that if they worship Jesus as GOD, Isaiah 9: Everlasting Father, Almighty GOD
 
The Law the Jerusalem Council, led by James, attempted to undermine Salvation by Grace only, By faith in Jesus Christ, of ACT 15, Which Paul the apostles was eventually slain because he refused to have them yoked to the Pharisaic LAW.
 
Then you may ask Mr. Moore, if he understands that in their Law, the "Goyim" Gentiles shall not have the TEN Commandments of GOD the same Father, for it is only for their own inheritance, but we must abide the Seven Universal Laws or be put to death.
 
Then ask Mr. Moore, if he is aware that the Sanhedrin was revived at Tiberias, Israel on Oct. 13, 2004
 
Then ask Mr Moore, if he is aware that the Sanhedrin led by their Nasi, Steinsaltz has just sent the Noahide Delegation to the US
 
Then ask MR. MOORE, if he is aware that George Bush, studies the Daf Yomi of Talmud Bavli, which is anti-CHRIST
 
Then ask MR. Moore if he is aware that Abramoff was a Chabad Lubavitch anti-Christ who say they are about to REVEAL their own Messiah, Moshiach ben Dovid
 
Then Ask MR. Moore if he is aware that the Chabad controls Moscow, London, Beijing, Paris, Germany and Washington DC, as well as Sanhedrin
 
Ask Mr Moore, If he understands that the two whores, Aholah which is Dan Samaria, of the North fights for the Seat of David, against Aholibah, her sister, the King of the South, secular zion, Judah, Sharon's Government to establish their Vision of the Great Harlot of the dragon which has given them their seat and power and their authority, to enslave the entire world by these laws which are anti-Christ.
 
ASK JUDGE ROY MOORE why he is not shouting at the top of his lungs regarding these RED Sofiet Talmudic sons of Satan's Synagogue, who have taken Control of the White House, Congress and the Judicial and are now fighting the WAR unto desolation, for all whose names are not written in the Lambs Book of Life slain from the Foundation of the WORLD.
To gain their Broken Covenant land from the Euphrates to the Nile which includes, Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Eretz Israel, Babylon Proper, when they made the Covenant with Death and Hell, and they made their "Replacement Theology", of their Tradition  which makes the WORD of GOD of None effect into another god who is no GOD the REDEEMER from the beginning, the WORD of God, who was with GOD and Who is GOD.
 
Will you do that Pastor Wilde, or will you complacently set back and be deceived and let your  congregation cry out for the Judeo-Churchinsanity Bloodlust of the Murderer from the Beginning, and do the lust of their father the murderer, and CRY to slay Ishmael. Because their GOD is not the LIFE GIVER and them whose names are in the BOOK of the LAMB DO NOT SLAY ANYMAN for any reason.
 
These are the sons of Hagar, the BOND Woman of Jerusalem that Great Whore City, That Spiritual Sodom and EGYPT, where our LORD was Crucified
 
Sincerely
 
robert pickle a servant of the only redeemer, the same from the foundation of the world, Jesus who alone is the Christ of the world

_______

 

Chertoff the Talmudic Hassidic Chabad Lubavitch anti-Christ Sanhedrin "Son of the Devil"

 

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/021206Y.shtml

Katrina Report Spreads Blame
    By Spencer S. Hsu
    The Washington Post

    Sunday 12 February 2006

Homeland Security, Chertoff singled out.

    Hurricane Katrina exposed the U.S. government's failure to learn the lessons of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, as leaders from President Bush down disregarded ample warnings of the threat to New Orleans and did not execute emergency plans or share information that would have saved lives, according to a blistering report by House investigators.

    A draft of the report, to be released publicly Wednesday, includes 90 findings of failures at all levels of government, according to a senior investigation staffer who requested anonymity because the document is not final. Titled "A Failure of Initiative," it is one of three separate reviews by the House, Senate and White House that will in coming weeks dissect the response to the nation's costliest natural disaster.

    The 600-plus-page report lays primary fault with the passive reaction and misjudgments of top Bush aides, singling out Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security Operations Center and the White House Homeland Security Council, according to a 60-page summary of the document obtained by The Washington Post. Regarding Bush, the report found that "earlier presidential involvement could have speeded the response" because he alone could have cut through all bureaucratic resistance.

    The report, produced by an 11-member House select committee of Republicans chaired by Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.), proposes few specific changes. But it is an unusual compendium of criticism by the House GOP, which generally has not been aggressive in its oversight of the administration.

    The report portrays Chertoff, who took the helm of the department six months before the storm, as detached from events. It contends he switched on the government's emergency response systems "late, ineffectively or not at all," delaying the flow of federal troops and materiel by as much as three days.

Purim Saints of NOLA

    The White House did not fully engage the president or "substantiate, analyze and act on the information at its disposal," failing to confirm the collapse of New Orleans's levee system on Aug. 29, the day of Katrina's landfall, which led to catastrophic flooding of the city of 500,000 people.

Six Shot Dead Military Men at the Levy by NOLA Police.....??????

    On the ground, Federal Emergency Management Agency director Michael D. Brown, who has since resigned, FEMA field commanders and the U.S. military's commanding general set up rival chains of command. The Coast Guard, which alone rescued nearly half of 75,000 people stranded in New Orleans, flew nine helicopters and two airplanes over the city that first day, but eyewitness reconnaissance did not reach official Washington before midnight.

    At the same time, weaknesses identified by Sept. 11 investigators - poor communications among first responders, a shortage of qualified emergency personnel and lack of training and funding - doomed a response confronted by overwhelming demands for help.

    "If 9/11 was a failure of imagination then Katrina was a failure of initiative. It was a failure of leadership," the report's preface states. "In this instance, blinding lack of situational awareness and disjointed decision making needlessly compounded and prolonged Katrina's horror."

    Chertoff spokesman Russ Knocke said, "every ounce of authority" and "100 percent of everything that could be pre-staged was pre-staged" by the federal government before landfall once the president signed emergency disaster declarations on Aug. 27. Brown had "all authority" to make decisions and requests, and his "willful insubordination . . . was a significant problem" for Chertoff, Knocke said.

    White House spokesman Trent Duffy said Bush had full confidence in his homeland security team, both appointed and career. "The president was involved from beginning to end," implementing emergency powers before the storm and taking responsibility afterward, Duffy said.

    Duffy objected to a leaked draft of an unpublished report, and said the White House is completing its own study. "The president is less interested in yesterday, and more interested with today and tomorrow," he said, "so that we can be better prepared for next time."

for he is directed by his Daf Yomi of Talmud Bavli

    The report puts the government response in a larger context and offers a few new details. In months of hearings, House and Senate investigative committees have already revealed the lack of White House awareness of events on the ground, political infighting between federal and state leaders, delays in ordering evacuations and the meltdown of FEMA operations.

    The review, launched Sept. 15, suggests that federal funding be used to update state evacuation studies. It proposes making commercial airliners available in an emergency and creating a database to provide a national clearinghouse of shelter data. It also suggests naming a professional disaster adviser to the president, akin to the military's chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    Democrats, whose leaders considered the investigation a partisan whitewash and boycotted it, called for Chertoff's removal. Reps. Charlie Melancon (D-La.) and William J. Jefferson (D-La.),who informally participated in the inquiry, renewed calls for an independent commission styled after the one that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks, saying that the investigation, while comprehensive, was rushed, failed to compel the White House to turn over documents and held no administration officials accountable.

    House investigators acknowledge that after reviewing nine hearings, scores of interviews and 500,000 pages of documents, they "will never know" what would have happened had federal, Louisiana and New Orleans officials activated plans and called on the military before the storm, and evacuated the city sooner than Aug. 28. However, the committee found U.S. disaster preparedness - individual, corporate, philanthropic and governmental - remains dangerously inadequate.

    "All the little pigs built houses of straw," it wrote. "Katrina was a national failure, an abdication of the most solemn obligation to provide for the common welfare."

    The report reconstructs a chronology of events over a three-week span from Aug. 22 to Sept. 12. It focuses primarily on failures by Chertoff and the rest of the administration to execute a year-old National Response Plan and set up a related command structure, designed to marshal resources in the critical first 72 hours after a catastrophe.

    The report said the single biggest federal failure was not anticipating the consequences of the storm. Disaster planners had rated the flooding of New Orleans as the nation's most feared scenario, testing it under a catastrophic disaster preparedness program in 2004.

    About 56 hours before Katrina made landfall, the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center cited an "extremely high probability" that New Orleans would be flooded and tens of thousands of residents killed.

    Given those warnings, the report notes Bush's televised statement on Sept. 1 that "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees," and concludes: "Comments such as those . . . do not appear to be consistent with the advice and counsel one would expect to have been provided by a senior disaster professional."

    As the president's principal disaster adviser, Chertoff poorly executed many decisions, including declaring Katrina an "incident of national significance" - the highest designation under the national emergency response plan and convening an interagency board of experienced strategic advisers on Aug. 30 instead of Aug. 27; designating an untrained Brown to take charge of the disaster; and failing to invoke a federal plan that would have pushed federal help to overwhelmed state and local officials rather than waiting for them to request it.

    The report said Chertoff was "confused" about Brown's role and authority, and that it was unclear why he chose him, given his lack of skills and his hostility to FEMA's downgrading under new plans.

    After failing to foresee the need to muster buses, boats and aircraft, the next critical federal mistake was failure to confirm catastrophic levee breaches, the report asserts.

    Despite a FEMA official's eyewitness accounts of breaches starting at 7 p.m. on Aug. 29, the president's Homeland Security Council, led by homeland security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend and her deputy, Ken Rapuano, did not consider them confirmed until 11 hours later, on Aug. 30.

    The first federal order to evacuate New Orleans was not issued until 1:30 a.m. Aug. 31, and came only after FEMA's ground commander in New Orleans, Phil Parr, put out a call for buses after finding water lapping at the approaches to the Superdome, where about 12,000 victims were camped.

    The council's "failure to resolve conflicts in information and the 'fog of war,' not a lack of information, caused confusion," the House panel wrote. It added that the crisis showed the government remains "woefully incapable" of managing information, much as it was before the 2001 attacks.

    The summary obtained by The Post generally praises pre-storm evacuations by Gulf Coast leaders, but it criticizes preparations and decisions by Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D) and New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin (D), who knew that 100,000 city residents had no cars and relied on public transit. The city's failure to complete its mandatory evacuation, ordered Aug. 28, led to hundreds of deaths, the report said.

    Neighboring Plaquemines Parish, by contrast, issued its order Aug. 27, helping to hold the number of storm deaths there at three. Nursing homes outside New Orleans were able to find special transportation for patients, while at least one in the city could not find bus drivers by the time people were told to leave.

    The investigation also condemned "hyped media coverage of violence and lawlessness, legitimized by New Orleans authorities," for increasing security burdens, scaring away rescuers and heightening tension in the city.

    It faulted Nagin for repeating, in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, rumors of armed gangs committing rapes and murder in an "almost animalistic state." The report said few cases of gunshots or violence were confirmed, although it acknowledged that few police were able to investigate and victims may have had little incentive to report crime.

  -------

______

Net and Yahoo of Aholah Dan, the TBN Telly tubby  Noahide favorite son, squares off against Olmert of Judah, Aholibah for the battle of the seat of King David. They are playing Double speak double cross Globally. Putim is part og the scheme for he is led by his hassidic handler Beral Lazar Chabad Lubavitch rib-eye between the BEARS teeth

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=98438

Netanyahu: "Olmert is Detached from Reality"
12:59 Feb 13, '06 / 15 Shevat 5766
By Hillel Fendel

  Likud Chairman Netanyahu says that Acting Prime Minister Olmert is dangerously ignoring the Hamas rise to power.

"Olmert is detached from reality," Netanyahu told Army Radio today. "He did not see that his policy of free withdrawals led to the Hamas victory, and he did not foresee the firing of Kassams at Ashkelon, and he does not see the Hamas state that has arisen atop of Gush Dan [the greater Tel Aviv-Netanya area]."

The "I Told you So" Hassidic son of Sanhedrin of Satan, says

Netanyahu similarly criticised the media for underplaying the Hamas dangers. When Army Radio interviewer Razi Barkai said, "OK, we've exhausted the diplomatic topic, let's discuss something else," Netanyahu laughed and said,
"I know that the media has its limitations, but to think that we've exhaused this topic in two minutes is simply a joke. We have just undergone a veritable earthquake, with the rise of a fundamentalist-Islamic terrorist organization to power, giving it the ability to create another Iran right on our border - and we just pass over it as if it were nothing."

Olmert, in one of his first public speeches since assuming Prime Ministerial duties a month ago, said last night that his Kadima Party is the only alternative for the Israeli public: "On the right is a conservative party that is detached from reality and buried in slogans of the past - the Likud - while on the left is a radical socialist party led by Amir Peretz."

Olmert also said, "A government headed by myself will not conduct any negotiations with Hamas."

Both the Likud and Labor responded sharply to Olmert's speech. A Labor Party response attacked Olmert's mention of a seven-year plan to fight poverty: "The amount he spends on cigars is more than the minimum wage."

The Likud initiated a campaign today emphasizing the Russian invitation to Hamas - and the French half-hearted approval of such - as an indication of Olmert's perceived weakness. "Putin and Chirac are giving Olmert a lesson," the new Likud slogan states.

Kadima's new slogan is, "Israel is stronger than Bibi."

Netanyahu told Army Radio today,
"Olmert reveals inexperience in his attempts to deal with a complex reality that can be dealt with. He allowed Hamas to vote in Jerusalem, gave it money, brought the partition wall closer to central Israel, and now, after the horses have run away, he wants to close the barn doors that he left open."

Since Sharon would not have allowed Sanhedrin Dan to have their Hamas in power, he was conveniently "Removed". Olmert played into Sanhedrin's plan, Netanyahoo of Sanhedrin is now capitalizing on it, playing the Hamas Fear Factor. Hamas will do exactly what Sanhedrin wants, in order to enslave the palestinian's via their Noahide Laws

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts.  The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory


Netanyahu was asked twice if he regards Olmert as unfit to serve as Prime Minister. Despite his harsh criticism of Olmert, Netanyahu preferred to dodge this question - apparently in order to leave open the option of the Likud's joining an Olmert-led government in the future.

The Likud candidate continued,
"The Likud will build a wall against Hamas with international help, and we will ensure that the Jordan Valley and Judean Valley remain a part of the State.

Judea and Samaria of DAN..Jor-DAN

.. It must be understood that Hamas is not Fatah. You have to listen to them and believe them. Olmert will withdraw in order to enable another Iran to be built here. I have to tell the public the truth: This danger can be reduced.

see Dov Steins e-mail fom Sanhedrin

From: ??
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: RE:

Hamas is better. Now we will have the oportunity to through all of them back to Saudi Arabia what was impossible with Fatach.

 



"There is no difference between Kadima and Labor, they are both left-wing parties. Olmert has taken Peres, and Chaim Ramon, and Dalia Itzik. There is a choice: Either the Likud policies that foresee developments, or a policy of illusions led by Olmert, leading to continued strengthening of Hamas."

Beware, for the WAR unto desolation is Begun

_________

In order to snare the masses to the Talmudic Judeo-Chruchinsanity Scofield, Chosen jew shem sham of shame, of the Prophets of Baal, they must make is seem as though Russia will go against Israel, in order to get their Global WAR.

This is not the RED Dan of the RED Sofiet Talmudic North who is now in control of Moscow, Washington DC, London, Paris, Beijing and Berlin, and controls the Sanhedrin, which now is converging on spiritual ISRAEL, them by faith in Christ Jesus, his saints

But a Ruse of deception for Global Noahide enforcement

If you are one, who fell for the C.I Scofield, Darby, Lehaye Secret Rapture deception, I advise you REPENT immediately in Jesus the Christ, The ONLY Everlasing Father. For along with your deception, you now say that the god of the jews is your god, and the jews say that Jesus is a bastard son of a whore and a Roman Soldier, their god who is no god, has no Only Begotten SON the Savior, and they seek to slay any man, woman or child who worships Jesus, by the power and the working of Satan whom they serve

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=98419

Russia Joins Worldwide Islamic Jihad
08:03 Feb 13, '06 / 15 Shevat 5766

  A7 Radio's "Weekend Edition" with Tamar Yonah and Malkah Fleisher



Russian President Vladimir Putin has shocked the world by inviting the
radical islamic terrorist organization, Hamas, to visit Russia. Stating that Russia never considered Hamas to be a terrorist organization, Putin is raising the question - will there be another Cold War? Plus: Iran expels International Atomic Energy Agency surveillance systems - will Iran go nuclear? How many pounds of weaponry will be loaded on to long-range B2 bombers aimed at Iran?


______

They are dividing the earth for their gain....Beware
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/682345.html

Last update - 20:56 13/02/2006

Venezuela ready to receive Hamas visit 'with pleasure'

By The Associated Press

Venezuela said Monday it would welcome leaders from the Hamas movement "with pleasure" if they visit the country as part of a South American tour following victory in Palestinian elections.

Asked if the Venezuelan government will receive the Islamic militant group, Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel told reporters, "Of course we will. What is the problem?"

"If they come, with pleasure," Rangel said. "They've just won an election."

The United States, the European Union and the United Nations have insisted they would not deal with a Hamas-led Palestinian Authority and threatened to withhold hundreds of millions of dollars in aid unless the group recognizes Israel and renounces violence.

Hamas, responsible for scores of deadly attacks against Israelis, has refused to renounce its calls for Israel's destruction or give up its weapons.

The United States and Europe consider Hamas a terrorist organization.

President Hugo Chavez, however, frequently criticizes what he calls U.S. imperialist dominance in world affairs, and has often expressed sympathy for the Palestinian cause.

The leftist leader has said his government will be one of the first to recognize an independent Palestinian state.

Rangel said earlier this month that Hamas was expected to visit Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia and Venezuela as part of a regional tour to celebrate its electoral victory. On Monday, he said he didn't know when Hamas would arrive because the visit was not yet confirmed.

Moscow offered to meet this month with Hamas leaders.

____

Zech:12:11: In that day shall there be a great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon

 

Ar-magiddon

Rv:16:16: And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/682299.html

Last update - 16:03 13/02/2006

Study: U.S. attack on Iran would spark conflict involving Israel

By Reuters

LONDON - A United States attack on Iran could eventually lead to a lengthy confrontation involving many other countries in the region, including Israel, a British think tank said in a report released on Monday.

"A U.S. military attack on Iranian nuclear infrastructure would be the start of a protracted military confrontation that would probably involve Iraq, Israel and Lebanon as well as the United States and Iran, with the possibility of west Gulf States being involved as well," it said.

According to the Oxford Research Group report, thousands of military personnel and hundreds of civilians would be killed if the U.S. launched an air strike on Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear arms.

The report said any bombing of Iran by U.S. forces, or by Israel, would have to be part of a surprise attack that would inevitably catch many Iranians unprotected.

An attack could lead to the closure of the Gulf at the Straits of Hormuz and would probably have a substantial impact on oil prices, as well as spurring new attacks by Muslim radicals on Western interests, the report said.

"Military deaths in [the] first wave of attacks against Iran would be expected to be in the thousands, especially with attacks on air bases and Revolutionary Guard facilities," said the report by Paul Rogers of the University of Bradford.

"Civilian deaths would be in the many hundreds at least," it said. "If the war evolved into a wider conflict, primarily to pre-empt or counter Iranian responses, the casualties would eventually be much higher."

Western states suspect Iran of secretly aiming to build a nuclear bomb. Tehran says its nuclear facilities are intended to produce only electricity.

The U.S. and Israel have said they would prefer to solve the dispute through diplomacy but have not ruled out military action.

The report said an attack by the U.S. or Israel on Iran would probably spur Tehran to work as rapidly as possible towards developing a nuclear military option.

It said U.S. forces, already tied down in Iraq, would have a limited number of military options when dealing with Iran and would have to rely almost entirely on the air force and navy.

Any attack would almost certainly unify Iran and bolster the government in Tehran, and mean that any future U.S. relationship with Iran would have to be based on violence, the report said.

A military response to the crisis would be a "particularly dangerous option and should not be considered further," the report concluded.

 

____

Last update - 21:21 13/02/2006

Israeli envoys to play up Hamas links to Chechen separatists

By The Associated Press

Outraged by Moscow's (Aholah)  overtures to Hamas, Israel (Aholibah) has told its diplomats to play up alleged ties between the Palestinian militants and Chechens fighting to break away from Russia, Israeli political sources said on Monday.

They said the Foreign Ministry supplied embassies in Russia and elsewhere with an information pamphlet linking the Hamas and Chechen causes after Russian President Vladimir Putin said last week he wanted to invite leaders of the Islamic group to visit.

Putin's move raised hackles in Israel and the United States by challenging their campaign to isolate Hamas, which won Palestinian legislative elections last month, until it renounces violence and recognises the Jewish state's right to exist.

"The idea is to show the Russians and others that there is no difference between Hamas terrorism and Chechen terrorism," said a political source who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Hamas denies having links to the Chechen separatists.

"It is widely known that Hamas does not intervene in the internal affairs of other sovereign countries," said group spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri. "Attempts by Israel to isolate Hamas internationally, politically and economically have failed."

Russia has been fighting a Chechen insurgency since 1994 when it sent troops into the southern province to quell what later became an Islamist-led bid for independence. It says it is confronting mercenaries financed by "international terrorism."

The rebels say fighters from outside Russia are among them, but there has been no mention of Palestinian involvement.

The pamphlet circulated by Israel's Foreign Ministry was compiled by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, a think-tank staffed by former Israeli intelligence operatives.

"We would ask you to bring the contents of this report to the attention of opinion-shapers in the communities where you are based," said an attached memo addressed to diplomats, a copy of which was seen by Reuters.

Brain Dead Judeo-Churchinsanity

The pamphlet cites posters celebrating Hamas and Chechen leaders as Islamic warriors, which it says were distributed by the Palestinian militant group at West Bank universities and an orphanage in 2004 and later seized by Israeli troops.

No military or financial cooperation is alleged.

Hamas suicide bombings helped spearhead a Palestinian revolt that erupted in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip in 2000. Asked if his group supported the Chechen cause in principle, Abu Zuhri declined comment.

Arik Sheinerman ging up the Temple mount,  spearheaded the WAR unto desolation, WTC, IRAQ War and Now the INTERNATIONAL Clash of Civilzations...........of the Sanhedrin Beast for the Dragon they serve the murderer from the beginning

Putin has said that, unlike the United States and European Union, Russia does not consider Hamas a terrorist organisation.

______

Bushitlers,Talmudic Land of the Brave, "we do not torture"

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/021306Z.shtml

Report: US Is Abusing Captives
    By Maggie Farley
    The Los Angeles Times

A UN inquiry says the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, which at times amounts to torture, violates international law.

    New York - A draft United Nations report on the detainees at Guantanamo Bay concludes that the US treatment of them violates their rights to physical and mental health and, in some cases, constitutes torture.

    It also urges the United States to close the military prison in Cuba and bring the captives to trial on U.S. territory, charging that Washington's justification for the continued detention is a distortion of international law.

    The report, compiled by five U.N. envoys who interviewed former prisoners, detainees' lawyers and families, and U.S. officials, is the product of an 18-month investigation ordered by the U.N. Commission on Human Rights. The team did not have access to prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.

    Nonetheless, its findings - notably a conclusion that the violent force-feeding of hunger strikers, incidents of excessive violence used in transporting prisoners and combinations of interrogation techniques "must be assessed as amounting to torture" - are likely to stoke U.S. and international criticism of the prison.

    Nearly 500 people captured abroad since 2002 in Afghanistan and elsewhere and described by the U.S. as "enemy combatants" are being held at Guantanamo Bay.

    "We very, very carefully considered all of the arguments posed by the U.S. government," said Manfred Nowak, the U.N. special rapporteur on torture and one of the envoys. "There are no conclusions that are easily drawn. But we concluded that the situation in several areas violates international law and conventions on human rights and torture."

    The draft report, reviewed by the Los Angeles Times, has not been officially released. U.N. officials are in the process of incorporating comments and clarifications from the U.S. government.

    In November, the Bush administration offered the U.N. team the same tour of the prison given to journalists and members of Congress, but refused the envoys access to prisoners. Because of that, the U.N. group declined the visit.

    Nowak said he did not expect major changes to the report's conclusions and recommendations as a result of the U.S. government's response, though there would be amendments on minor issues.

    Navy Lt. Cmdr. J.D. Gordon, a spokesman for the Pentagon, said the Defense Department did not comment about U.N. matters.

    The report is not legally binding. But human rights and legal advocates hope the U.N.'s conclusions will add weight to similar findings by rights groups and the European Parliament.

    "I think the effect of this will be to revive concern about the government's mistreatment of detainees, and to get people to take another look at the legal basis," said Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch. "There are lots of lingering questions about how do you justify holding these people."

    The report focuses on the U.S. government's legal basis for the detentions as described in its formal response to the U.N. inquiry: "The law of war allows the United States - and any other country engaged in combat - to hold enemy combatants without charges or access to counsel for the duration of hostilities.

Especially if you are the Talmudic "War President" of LONG War, Unto desolation

 Detention is not an act of punishment, but of security and military necessity. It serves the purpose of preventing combatants from continuing to take up arms against the United States."

In real wars they just shoot you on front lines

    But the U.N. team concluded that there had been insufficient due process to determine whether the more than 750 people who had been detained at Guantanamo Bay since January 2002 were "enemy combatants," and determined that the primary purpose of their confinement was for interrogation, not to prevent them from taking up arms. The U.S. has released or transferred more than 260 detainees from Guantanamo Bay.

    It also rejected the premise that "the war on terrorism" exempted the U.S. from international conventions on torture and civil and political rights.

    The report said some of the treatment of detainees met the definition of torture under the U.N. Convention Against Torture: the acts were committed by government officials, with a clear purpose, inflicting severe pain or suffering against victims in a position of powerlessness.

gawd Bliss Amaraka

    The findings also concluded that the simultaneous use of several interrogation techniques - prolonged solitary confinement, exposure to extreme temperatures, noise and light; forced shaving and other techniques that exploit religious beliefs or cause intimidation and humiliation - constituted inhumane treatment and, in some cases, reached the threshold of torture.

    Nowak said that the U.N. team was "particularly concerned" about the force-feeding of hunger strikers through nasal tubes that detainees claimed were brutally inserted and removed, causing intense pain, bleeding and vomiting.

    "It remains a current phenomenon," Nowak said.

    International Red Cross guidelines state: "Doctors should never be party to actual coercive feeding. Such actions can be considered a form of torture and under no circumstances should doctors participate in them on the pretext of saving the hunger striker's life."

    One detainee, a Kuwaiti named Fawzi Al Odah, told his lawyer this month that he stopped his five-month hunger strike under threats of physical abuse.

    Thomas B. Wilner, a lawyer at Shearman & Sterling in Washington who has represented 12 Kuwaitis held at Guantanamo Bay, said that Odah told him that in December guards began taking away clothes, shoes and blankets from about 85 hunger strikers.

    Wilner said Odah described guards mixing laxatives into the liquid formula they gave to about 40 prisoners through the nose tubes, causing them to defecate on themselves.

In Jesus Mighty Name, Keeel All em dirty Arabs, Right? Churchinsanity Bloodlusters of the Murderer? Bush is a man of Gawd, right? Jesus said KILL any who oppose Bush....right? and your chosen massah race is your damned Talmudic jews? Right.........wrong, and you are all damned into eternal shame

    Wilner said Odah told him that on Jan 9, an officer read what he said was an order from Guantanamo Bay's commander, Brig. Gen. Jay W. Hood, stating that hunger strikers would be strapped into a restraint chair and force-fed with thick nasal tubes that would be inserted and removed twice a day. After hearing a neighboring prisoner scream in pain and tell him not to go through it, Odah reluctantly ceased his hunger strike, Wilner said.

    "I stopped it because they forced me to stop," Wilner quoted Odah as telling him. "They stopped it through torture."

    Pentagon officials said the number of hunger strikers had dropped to four.

    Officials have been force-feeding detainees since August, but they started leaving the long nasal tubes in place in September after detainees complained that having them jammed down their noses to their stomachs and removed twice a day caused intense pain, bleeding, vomiting and fainting, Wilner said.

    In January, he said, after harsh treatment resumed and hunger strikers were left strapped in the restraint chair in their own excretions, most gave up their protest.

    "It is clear that the government used force to end the hunger strike," Wilner said. "It was brutality purposely applied to them to make them stop."

    White House spokesman Scott McClellan dismissed Odah's claims Thursday.

Scott McClellan the Spokesperson of the Noahide beast

    "Well, yes, we know that Al Qaeda is trained in trying to make wild accusations and so forth," McClellan said in response to a question about Odah. "But the president has made it very clear what the policy is, and we expect the policy to be followed. And he's made it very clear that we do not condone torture, and we do not engage in torture."

We do however lie in every breath, said the spokesperson

    Wilner said Odah had not been accused of being part of Al Qaeda.

    The International Red Cross is the only party allowed by the U.S. government to have access to prisoners and monitor their physical and mental health, but the organization is forbidden from making its findings public.

and are of Blasphemy and TREASON, too.

    The five U.N. envoys are independent experts appointed by the U.N. Commission on Human Rights to examine arbitrary detention, torture, the independence of judges and lawyers, freedom of religion and the right to physical and mental health.

    The five had each been following the situation at Guantanamo Bay since it opened in January 2002. They decided in June 2004 to do a joint report and asked the U.S. government for access to all detention centers.

    "This report is not aimed at criticizing," Nowak said. "It is looking at what international human rights law says about Guantanamo. We are hoping that this report will actually strengthen the dialogue."

    --------

_______

The Follies of the Sanhedrin's Chief Jester, Bushitler is Being revealed

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4707626.stm

 

Uproar as Saddam returns to court

 

 

Saddam Hussein
Saddam Hussein attended court in traditional Arab dress
An angry Saddam Hussein has appeared in court saying he was being forced to attend after boycotting earlier sessions with his seven co-defendants.

The former Iraqi leader shouted "Down with Bush" and continued a stormy exchange with the new chief judge who he says is biased and wants removed.

The defendants are accused of killing 148 Shia villagers in Dujail in 1982.

The trial was adjourned until Tuesday but not before two ex-Saddam aides complained of being forced to testify.

The former head of Saddam Hussein's office, Ahmed Khudayir, and the former chief of foreign intelligence, Hassan al-Obeidi, both blocked questions.

Scuffles

Amid threats of a continued boycott, the chief prosecutor had asked new chief judge, Raouf Abdul Rahman, to bring Saddam Hussein and his co-defendants to the Baghdad court by force if necessary.

On entering court, Saddam Hussein said: "They have forcibly brought me here."

He told the judge: "Exercise your right to try me in absentia. Are you trying to overcome your own smallness?"

The former leader wore a blue traditional Arab robe and a black jacket in contrast to the suit he had worn previously.

"Down with the traitor, down with traitors, down with Bush. Long live the ummah (Islamic nation)... long live the ummah... long live the ummah," Saddam Hussein shouted.

His half-brother Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti scuffled with guards as he was brought in.

Both then continued to harangue the judge throughout the early proceedings, refusing orders to sit down and be quiet.

"This is not a court, this is not a court, this is a game," Saddam Hussein shouted.

Barzan Ibrahim sat on the floor with his back to the judge.

Judge Rahman said he was implementing laws that Saddam Hussein had put in place.

The judge rejected claims that the defence lawyers had been thrown out, saying they had chosen not to attend.

Failure to show

The prosecution brought Mr Khudayir and Mr Obeidi to the witness stand to try to link Saddam Hussein's leadership directly with the killings in Dujail. The defendants deny all the charges.

Mr Khudayir headed Saddam Hussein's presidential office from 1995 to the fall of the regime. He attended a military planning session on 9 April 2003, two days before the Americans entered Baghdad.

But he said he knew nothing of the events at Dujail in 1982.

"I am not fit to be a witness in this case," he said.

When shown a document, purported to contain his signature, which apparently showed Saddam Hussein had ratified "the execution of the Dujail detainees", Mr Khudayir said: "I don't remember. I don't remember anything at all."

Mr Obeidi said he was being forced to appear as a witness and refused to testify. Saddam Hussein laughed as he spoke.

The new chief judge took over last month after the resignation of chief judge Rizgar Amin and has adopted a more hardline approach to the defendants.

Saddam Hussein and some of his co-defendants failed to show up at the past few sessions.

The BBC's Jon Brain in Baghdad says the prosecution was aware that the spectacle of an empty dock risked further undermining a trial that has repeatedly descended into farce.

But he says if the defendants were brought in by force, defence lawyers would argue it proved their claim that the judge was biased towards the prosecution.

_______

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/12/D8FNUKEO0.html

Gore Laments U.S. 'Abuses' Against Arabs
Feb 12 9:08 PM US/Eastern

 

JIDDAH, Saudi Arabia

Former Vice President Al Gore told a mainly Saudi audience on Sunday that the U.S. government committed "terrible abuses" against Arabs after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and that most Americans did not support such treatment.

Gore said Arabs had been "indiscriminately rounded up" and held in "unforgivable" conditions. The former vice president said the Bush administration was playing into al-Qaida's hands by routinely blocking Saudi visa applications.

"The thoughtless way in which visas are now handled, that is a mistake," Gore said during the Jiddah Economic Forum. "The worst thing we can possibly do is to cut off the channels of friendship and mutual understanding between Saudi Arabia and the United States."

Gore told the largely Saudi audience, many of them educated at U.S. universities, that Arabs in the United States had been "indiscriminately rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa or not having a green card in proper order, and held in conditions that were just unforgivable."

"Unfortunately there have been terrible abuses and it's wrong," Gore said. "I do want you to know that it does not represent the desires or wishes or feelings of the majority of the citizens of my country."

On Iran, Gore complained of "endemic hyper-corruption" among Tehran's religious and political elite and asked Arabs to take a stand against Iran's nuclear program.

Iran says its program is for peaceful purposes but the United States and other Western countries suspect Tehran is trying to develop nuclear weapons.

"Is it only for the West to say this is dangerous?" Gore asked. "We should have more people in this region saying this is dangerous."

Several audience members criticized the United States for what they described as "unconditional" U.S. support for Israel, saying U.S. diplomats helped Israel flout U.N. resolutions that they enforced when the measures targeted Arabs.

Gore refused to be drawn into questions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"We can't solve that long conflict in exchanges here," Gore said.

Also at the forum, the vice chairman of Chevron Corp., Peter Robertson, said President Bush's desire to cut U.S. dependence on Mideast oil shows a "misunderstanding" of global energy supply and the critical role of Saudi Arabia.

In his State of the Union address this month, Bush pledged to cut U.S. dependence on Middle East oil by 75 percent by 2025.

"This notion of being energy independent is completely unreasonable," Robertson said at the economic forum, which opened Saturday.

"I believe Middle Eastern oil can and must play a certain role in the system," Robertson said. "Saudi Arabia's massive resources will continue to promote international energy security and serve as a moderating force in balancing supply and demand."

Cherie Blair, wife of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, made a plea at the forum for women's rights, telling Saudi leaders that the dearth of women in the work force was "undermining economic potential" of the kingdom.

Irish President Mary McAleese urged Saudi Arabia to learn from Ireland's economic transformation, which hinged on opening the country to the outside world and ushering women into the workplace.

___

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-02-13T153028Z_01_

L13432231_RTRUKOC_0_US-SYRIA-US-FOREX.xml&rpc=22

Syria switches to euro amid confrontation with US

Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:31 AM ET13

DAMASCUS (Reuters) - Syria has switched all of the state's foreign currency transactions to euros from dollars amid a political confrontation with the United States, the head of state-owned Commercial Bank of Syria said on Monday.

"This is a precaution. We are talking about billions of dollars," Duraid Durgham told Reuters.

The bank, which still dominates the Syrian market although private banks have been allowed to set up in the last few years, has also stopped dealing with dollars in the international foreign exchange flows of private clients.

The United States has been at the forefront of international pressure on Syria for its alleged role in the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri a year ago. Damascus denies involvement in the killing.

"It looks like a kind of pre-emptive action aimed at making their foreign assets safer, preventing them from getting frozen in case of any conflict," said a Middle East economist who requested anonymity

Amaraka the Nation of Lies, Murders, Thefts, Blasphemy and TREASON, gawd bliss her, and Judeo-Apostasy says......amen and amen

________

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/130206usprovocation.htm

Another Russian MP Says Muslim Riots Were US Provocation

Echoing the comments of Liberal Democrats leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, another Russian MP has gone public with his contention that the recent Muslim riots were a staged US provocation in order to swing public opinion in Europe behind supporting an attack on Iran.

Gennady Zyuganov told a news conference that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a "well thought-out major provocation using newspapers and magazines to aggravate the situation, the relationship between the European countries and the Muslim world.”

Zyuganov (pictured below) said that the riots could only benefit the US and that they were "not advantageous for Europe but those who have raised this hysteria, insulted religious feelings of one and a half billion of Muslims, are pushing Europe into the arms of the American military clique.”

Last week, Vladimir Zhirinovsky said that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a planned psyop on the part of the US and aimed to “provoke a row between Europe and the Islamic world”.

“It will all end with European countries thanking the United States and paying, and giving soldiers,” said Zhirinovsky.

Although the riots have largely calmed, the build-up to a military strike on Iran is intense, with newspapers today reporting that the Pentagon had significantly advanced in its planning for bombing raids and submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks on the country.

_____

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=681830&contrassID=2

The coma and the conspiracy theory

Monday, 13 February (43 days to election day)

Forget monitoring vital signs. Monitor talkbacks.

The moment that Ariel Sharon takes a turn for the worse, the messages flood in. Thankfully, the great majority are wishes that he might not suffer, or prayers for a miracle recovery.

It is a measure of the unbearable meanness of the Internet, however, that the first to arrive are almost always those who wish him ill, wish him hell, or alternatively, those who voice the hope that he will live on to suffer through endless rounds of new surgeries and unimaginable cutting-edge bio-tech tortures.

anti-Semitic haters

It is a measure of the unbearable, globalized meanness of our age, that you generally can't tell until the end of the letter whether the letter writer in question is a maniacal Palestinian - often resident in the Bay Area or the Rust Belt - or a foaming at the mouth settler wannabe - often writing from South Africa or Australia, or whether the war crime in question took place in Qibiya or Kfar Darom.

This time around, though, there was a whole new group, particularly evident on the Talkbacks of a competitive English Israel Website.

Within minutes of Ariel Sharon having been rushed to an operating theater for emergency abdominal surgery on a Sabbath morning, the debate was not should he die in pain or live in agony, but rather When Olmert Will Let Him Die for Maximal Electoral Advantage.

This group is clearly one of a number of what may be called Web Anthills, in which the members of a like-thinking e-clan instantaneously share the same take on a given issue.

In a sense, this is no conspiracy theory. Why not? Because, as far as the writers are concerned, (A.) It's no conspiracy, it's only Kadima, and (B.) It's no theory, because we all know it to be true.

The debate, which swirled while the operation was still in progress - an operation from which, hospital officials had cautioned, Sharon might well not emerge alive - offered a variety of dates for a state funeral, for maximum pro-Kadima effect.

One poster said that Kadima would deliberately keep Sharon in his vegetative state until a few days before the election - to minimize the "staleness" of the sympathy factor in keeping him alive until March 28. Then, the poster said, they will "pull the plug," to coincide with "massive tear-jerking television coverage," and world leaders attending a state funeral, all to Olmert's advantage.

Other talkback respondents voted for March 27, or other dates in between.

Mean or inappropriate as the letters may be, they still point to a valid political question, one that political commentators addressed at length this week:

What effect has Sharon's incapacitation had on the election race, and how might that influence change if the prime minister were to die?

A possible answer to the first question was hinted at during Army Radio's dawn news broadcast Sunday, when anchor Ronit Kfir noticed that there were barely six weeks left to the election.

"Only forty-four days left? That can't be. There's no campaign going on," she told the national radio audience.

Another indication came from a poll released on Sunday, which averaged in the results of all newspaper opinion surveys at the weekend. The most striking outcome was that the numbers, placing Kadima at 41 seats in the 120-seat Knesset, Labor at 20 and the Likud at 15-16, were the same figures as in a parallel survey compiled a month ago, just after it became clear that Sharon would not return to office.

Several senior political analysts were asked Sunday what the influence on the electorate would have been, had Sharon not survived the surgery on the Sabbath. Some of the answers, though considerably more judicious, bore an oblique resemblance to some of the Web posters.

"It's awful to talk about this, but there are politics and realpolitik involved, although among the Kadima people and Ariel Sharon's friends, these aren't the thoughts you sense they are thinking, rather, 'What can we do for him [the prime minister] now, so that this doesn't drag on for too long," said Ben Caspit of Maariv.

Still, according to Caspit, speaking on the radio Sunday, "In the end, we are all human beings, and when Sharon does go to the World of Truth, if and when,
there will be two weeks of a 'festival' that will bring the entire world and its wife to land here, and in those two weeks, [Kadima] could rise from 40 to 50 seats, later sliding from 50 to 40, instead of sliding from 40 to 30.

In terms of picturing Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert as a world leader, Caspit continued, "something like this could certainly 'upgrade' him, a conversation with Bush, a conversation with Mubarak, with the Russians, the French, the British."

Added Raviv Drucker of Channel 10 Television, "Why discuss the 'if and when,' let's talk about the here and now. It's clear that it's much harder to run a negative campaign [against Kadima] when things like this happen."

"'When everyone aims for unity after the death of a prime minister, how can I put up something else,'" Drucker quoted one non-Kadima campaign manager as saying.

Moreover, the Kadima campaign is built on tearing one more day off the calendar each day, Drucker said, "and this 'supplies' a few more days."

_____

If he had been slain, would you have heard of it?

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-02-13T204504Z_01_N12148881_

RTRUKOC_0_US-CHENEY-ACCIDENT-1.xml&rpc=22

White House under fire in Cheney shooting accident

Mon Feb 13, 2006 3:45 PM ET7

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush knew hours after Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot a fellow quail hunter but the White House came under fire on Monday for not making the information public until the next day.

The victim, Harry Whittington, 78, took pellets in his cheek, neck and chest when Cheney fired his shotgun while aiming for a bird during a hunt in southern Texas on Saturday, and was in stable condition at a Corpus Christi hospital.

Whittington was in intensive care as a precautionary measure because he was "peppered by shotgun spray," said Peter Banko, administrator of Christus Spohn Hospital. His condition is "not critical, not serious. It's just stable at this time."

The accident happened around 5:30 p.m. on a private ranch about 200 miles south of San Antonio, where the vice president has hunted previously. Whittington was treated on the scene by Cheney's traveling medical detail before being taken by helicopter to the hospital.

The accident was not reported publicly by the vice president's office until Sunday afternoon and then only after an account provided by the ranch's owner appeared on the Web site of the Corpus Christi Caller-Times -- the local newspaper.

In a testy exchange with reporters on Monday, White House spokesman Scott McClellan was bombarded with questions about the propriety of a private citizen making public a shooting incident involving the vice president and whether Cheney had followed White House protocol.

McClellan said Bush and senior aides were first told by staff in the Situation Room that there had been an accident in Cheney's hunting party and that the president learned later on Saturday night that the vice president had been the shooter.

"I think he was informed in a relatively reasonable time," he said at the news briefing.

A LONG STORY

of the LONG Con

of the LONG war

of the WAR President of Sanhedrin ?

McClellan said the vice president's staff did not tell reporters about the accident on Saturday because they were concerned about getting Whittington medical attention and were still gathering facts.

Whooooey

Cheney and the owner of the property, Katharine Armstrong, then agreed that she should provide the information to the public about an accident that happened on her ranch

Whooooey

________

http://www.worldnews.com/

Insider reignites Iraqi intelligence war
By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - The US intelligence community's top Middle East analyst from 2000 to 2005 has accused the George W Bush administration of distorting and politicizing intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq war.

In an article published on Friday in Foreign Affairs magazine, analyst Paul Pillar, who resigned from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) last year, also charges that the Bush administration ignored much of the analysis that had been prepared by the intelligence community, including its predictions of the chaos and conflict that followed the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. He argues that



the administration not only ignored the traditional model for separating the functions of policymakers - who are to make decisions based on facts and analyses developed by independent intelligence specialists - from those of the intelligence analysts themselves, but "turned the entire model upside down".

"The administration used intelligence not to inform decision-making, but to justify a decision already made," he wrote. "It went to war without requesting - and evidently without being influenced by - any strategic-level intelligence assessments on any aspect of Iraq."

Indeed, said Pillar, as the national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, the first request he received from the administration for such an assessment was not until a year after the March 2003 invasion.

Pillar's charges that the administration "cherry-picked" and otherwise manipulated the intelligence process in order to take the country to war are the most serious since the leak of the so-called "Downing Street Memo" to the London Sunday Times last May.

The memo, the minutes of a meeting of British Prime Minister Tony Blair's war cabinet in July 2002, quotes intelligence chief Alastair Campbell, who had just returned from a trip to Washington, as reporting that Bush "wanted to remove Saddam, through military action ..." and, to that end, "... the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy".

Carefully planned for shembolic "Purim Saddam" March 17, 2003

The memo's contents - which bolstered charges by a number of retired US intelligence officers who had spoken out against the war - put the administration and its Republican backers on the Senate Intelligence Committee, on the defensive. The Republicans on the committee have stalled Democratic demands for an investigation of the administration's use of the prewar intelligence.

That Pillar, a witness - and a high-ranking one at that - has now publicly joined the chorus of critics with his own bill of particulars, marks a serious setback to Bush's Republican administration and one the Democrats are certain to seize on.

Senate minority leader Harry Reid called for investigation. "Evidence that the Bush White House manipulated and selectively declassified intelligence to wage a public relations campaign before, during and after the invasion of Iraq grows every day," he said.

Pillar's charges are also likely to be more difficult for the administration to refute in light of new disclosures on Thursday that I Lewis "Scooter" Libby - the former chief of staff of Vice President Dick Cheney who is now under indictment for lying to federal authorities about his role in "outing" a CIA operative - has since testified that he had been "authorized" by Cheney and other White House officials to leak classified information to reporters in the run-up to the war.

The purpose of those leaks, which continued after the war, according to The National Journal, which broke the story, was to "build public support" for going to war.

According to previously published reports, Libby acted as the liaison between the White House and special units in the Pentagon's policy office of former under secretary of defense, Douglas Feith. (Talmudic Hassidic Chabad Lubavitcher)  Those units reviewed "raw intelligence", particularly related to alleged links between then Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda, and sent it directly to Cheney's office and the White House without submitting it for vetting by professional intelligence analysts.

In his article, which generally avoids naming specific individuals responsible for politicizing the intelligence process, Pillar explicitly identifies Feith's Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group as responsible for distorting the normal intelligence process in a number of ways - by supposedly discovering links between al-Qaeda and Saddam reported in the raw intelligence and by presenting "briefings [that] accused the intelligence community of faulty analysis for failing to see the supposed alliance" between the two.

While Pillar admits the intelligence community made serious mistakes in gauging the status of Saddam's alleged weapons programs, he charges that the Bush administration deliberately ignored the larger strategic judgments by the intelligence community - that "deterrence of Iraq was working, that Saddam was being kept 'in his box", and that the best way to deal with the weapons problem was through an aggressive inspections program to supplement the sanctions already in place".

"That the administration arrived at so different a policy solution indicates that its decision to topple Saddam was driven by other factors - namely, the desire to shake up the sclerotic power structures of the Middle East and hasten the spread of more liberal politics and economics in the region.

Noahide enforcement

"If the entire body of official intelligence analysis on Iraq had a policy implication, it was to avoid war - or if war was going to be launched, to prepare for a messy aftermath. What is most remarkable about prewar US intelligence on Iraq is not that it got things wrong and thereby misled policymakers; it is that it played so small a role in one of the most important US policy decisions in recent decades."

Before the war, according to Pillar, the intelligence community also considered the main challenges that would be faced by any post-invasion authority in Iraq, and forecast "a deeply divided Iraqi society" that could erupt into "violent conflict" unless the occupying power "established security and put Iraq on the road to prosperity in the first few weeks or months after the fall of Saddam".

It also predicted that war and occupation would "boost political Islam and increase sympathy for terrorists' objectives - and Iraq would become a magnet for extremists from elsewhere in the Middle East".

But this assessment was undertaken only on the intelligence community's own initiative. The administration never requested such an analysis, according to Pillar.

As the administration marched to war in 2002 and 2003, according to Pillar, intelligence officers registered "varying degrees of private protest", particularly when the administration's public statements went "beyond what analysts deemed credible or reasonable", especially regarding the alleged existence of an al-Qaeda-Saddam alliance and Bush's assertion in his 2003 State of the Union address that Iraq had tried to buy uranium ore in Africa.

The intelligence community never backed up the al-Qaeda-Saddam connection, according to Pillar. "The enormous attention devoted to this subject did not reflect any judgment by intelligence officials that there was or was likely to be anything like the 'alliance' the administration said existed," he wrote.

"The reason the connection got so much attention was that the administration wanted to hitch the Iraq expedition to the 'war on terror' and the threat the American public fear most, thereby capitalizing on the country's militant post-9/11 mood.

"Feeding the administration's voracious appetite for material on the Saddam-al-Qaeda link consumed an enormous amount of time and attention at multiple levels, from rank-and-file counterterrorism analysts to the most senior intelligence officials. It is fair to ask how much other counterterrorism work was left undone as a result."

Pressure exerted by administration officials on intelligence analysts was seldom crude or direct, according to Pillar, who said they made their preferences known more subtly. "It was clear that the Bush administration would frown on or ignore analysis that called into question a decision to go to war and welcome analysis that supported such a decision. Intelligence analysts - for whom attention, especially favorable attention, from policymakers is a measure of success - felt a strong wind consistently blowing in one direction. The desire to bend with such a wind is natural and strong, even if unconscious."

The fact that Pillar published his article in Foreign Affairs, whose publisher, the Council on Foreign Relations, is headed by Richard Haass, a top adviser to former secretary of state Colin Powell, is also likely to bolster the critics who have charged the administration with politicizing intelligence.

Not only is the magazine the most influential foreign policy publication of its kind, but Haass, who resigned as head of Powell's policy office shortly after the war began, has repeatedly expressed bewilderment as to when the administration decided to go to war and why it did so.

Powell's chief of staff at the time, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, has also publicly charged that Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Feith's superior, formed a "cabal" that deliberately circumvented or manipulated the normal policymaking process, including the intelligence community, in order to take the country to war.

_______

Noahide News Part 394

 

 

No to Noahide

http://angelofthewest.tripod.com/index.htm

 

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II

"Questions"

"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

 ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7 Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees

Exod-U.S the coming Geula 

anti-semitism?

Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

Noahide News Part 3

Noahide News Part 4

Noahide News Part 5

Noahide News Part 6

Noahide News Part 7

Noahide News Part 8

Noahide News Part 9

Noahide News Part 10

Noahide News Part 11

Noahide News Part 12

Noahide News Part 13

Noahide News Part 14

Noahide News Part 15

Noahide News Part 16

Noahide News Part 17

Noahide News Part 18

Noahide News Part 19

Noahide News Part 20

Noahide News Part 21

Noahide News part 22

Noahide News Part 23

Noahide News part 24

Noahide News Part 25

Noahide News Part 26

Noahide News part 27

Noahide News Part 28

Noahide News Part 29

Noahide News Part 30

Noahide News Part 31

Noahide News Part 32

Noahide News Part 33

Noahide News Part 34

Noahide News Part 35

Noahide News Part 36

Noahide News Part 37

Noahide News Part 38

Noahide News Part 39

Noahide News Part 40

Noahide News Part 41

Noahide News Part 42

Noahide News Part 43

Noahide News Part 44

Noahide News Part 45

Noahide News Part 46

Noahide News Part 47

Noahide News Part 48

Noahide News Part 49

Noahide News Part 50

Noahide News Part 51

Noahide News Part 52

Noahide News Part 53

Noahide News Part 54

Noahide News Part 55

Noahide NewsPart 56

Noahide News Part 57

Noahide News Part 58

Noahide News Part 59

Noahide News Part 60

Noahide News Part 61

Noahide News Part 62

Noahide News Part 63

Noahide News Part 64 

Noahide News Part 65

Noahide News Part 66

Noahide News Part 67

Noahide News Part 68

Noahide News Part 69

Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist

Noahide News Part 70

Noahide News Part 71

Noahide News Part 72

Noahide News Part 73

Noahide News Part 74

Noahide News Part 75

Noahide News Part 76

Noahide News Part 77

Noahide News Part 78

Noahide News Part 79

Noahide News Part 80

Noahide News Part 81

Noahide News Part 82

Noahide News Part 83 ALERT ALERT ALERT

Noahide News Part 84

Noahide News Part 85

Noahide News Part 86

Noahide News Part 87

Noahide News Part 88

Noahide News Part 89

Noahide News part 90

Noahide News Part 91

Noahide News Part 92

Noahide News Part 93

Noahide News Part 94

Noahide News Part 95

Noahide News Part 96

Noahide News Part 97

Noahide News Part 98

Noahide News Part 99

Noahide News Part 100

Noahide News Part 101

Noahide News Part 102

Noahide News Part 103

Noahide News Part 104

Noahide News Part 105

Noahide News Part 106

Noahide News Part 107

Noahide News Part 108

Noahide News Part 109

Noahide News Part 110

Noahide News Part 111

Noahide News Part 112

Noahide News Part 113

Noahide News Part 114

Noahide Naws Part 115

Noahide News Part 116

Noahide News Part 117

Noahide News Part 118

Noahide News Part 119

Noahide News Part 120

Noahide News Part 121

Noahide News Part 122

Noahide News Part 123

Noahide News Part 124

Noahide News part 125

Noahide News Part 126

Noahide News Part 127

Noahide News Part 128

Noahide News Part 129

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News Part 130

Noahide news Part 131

Noahide News Part 132

Noahide News Part 133

Noahide News Part 134

Noahide News Part 135

Noahide news Part 136

Noahide News Part 137

Noahide News Part 138

Noahide News Part 139

Noahide News Part 140

Noahide News Part 141

Noahide News Part 142

Noahide News Part 143 THE JEWISH RELIGION Its InfluenceToday

Noahide News Part 144

Noahide News Part 145

Noahide News Part 146

Noahide news Part 147

Noahide News Part 148

Noahide News Part 149

Noahide News Part 150

Noahide News Part 151

Noahide News Part 152

Noahide News Part 153

Noahide News Part 154

NoahideNews Part 155

Noahide News Part 156

Noahide News Part 157

Noahide News Part 158

Noahide News Part 159

Noahide News Part 160

Noahide News Part 161

Noahide News Part 162

Noahide News Part 163

Noahide News Part 164

Noahide News Part 165

Noahide News part 166

Noahide News Part 167

Noahide News Part 168

Alert ! Noahide News Part 169 Alert ! Alert ! false Elijah cometh?

Noahide News Part 170

Noahide News Part 171

Noahide News Part 172

Noahide News Part 173

Noahide News Part 174 

Noahide News Part 175

Noahide News Part 176

Noahide News Part 177

Noahide News Part 178

Noahide News Part 179

Noahide News Part 180

Noahide News Part 181

Noahide News Part 182

Noahide News Part 183

Noahide News Part 184

Noahide News Part 185

Noahide News part 186

Noahide News Part 187

Noahide News Part 188

Noahide News Part 189

Noahide News Part 190 Alert ! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 191

Noahide News part 192

Noahide News Part 193

Noahide News Part 194

Noahide News Part 195

Noahide News Part 196

Noahide News Part 197 Alert Alert Alert !

Noahide News part 198

Noahide News Part 199

Noahide News Part 200

Noahide News Part 201

Noahide News Part 202

Noahide News Part 203Alert Alert Alert !

Noahide News Part 204 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 205

Noahide news Part 206

Noahide News Part 207

Noahide News Part 208

Noahide News Part 209

Noahide News Part 210

Noahide News Part 211

Noahide News Part 212

Noahide News Part 213

Noahide News Part 214

Noahide News Part 215

Noahide News Part 216

Noahide News Part 217

Noahide News Part 218

Noahide News Part 219

Noahide News Part 220 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 221

Noahide News Part 222 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 223

Noahide News Part 224 Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 225

Noahide News Part 226

Noahide News Part 227

Noahide News Part 228 Alert! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News Part 229

Noahide News Part 230 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 231

Noahide News Part 232

Noahide News Part 233

Noahide News Part 234

Noahide News part 235

Noahide News Part 236

Noahide News part 237

Noahide News Part 238

Noahide News Part 239

Noahide News Part 240

Noahide News Part 241 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 242

Noahide News Part 243

Noahide News Part 244

Noahide News Part 245

Noahide News Part 246

Noahide News Part 247

Noahide News Part 248

Noahide News Part 249

"Left Behind"

Noahide News Part 250

Noahide News Part 251

Noahide News Part 252

Noahide News Part 253

Noahide News Part 254

Noahide News Part 255

Noahide News Part 256

Noahide News part 257

Noahide News Part 258

Noahide News Part 259

Noahide News Part 260

Noahide News Part 261

Noahide News Part 262

Noahide News Part 263

Noahide News Part 264

Noahide News Part 265

Noahide News Part 266

Noahide News Part 267

Noahide News Part 268

Noahide News Part 269

Noahide News Part 270

Noahide News Part 271

Noahide News Part 272

Noahide News Part 273

Noahide News Part 274

Noahide News Part 275

Noahide News Part 276

Noahide News Part 277

Noahide News Part 278

Noahide News Part 279

Noahide News Part 280

Noahide News Part 281

Noahide News Part 282

Noahide News Part 283

Noahide News Part 284

Noahide News Part 285

Saints of the Living God

Noahide News Part 286

Noahhide News Part 287

Noahide News Part 288

Noahide News Part 289

Goon squad part II

Noahide News Part 290

Noahide News Part 291

Noahide News Part 292

Noahide News Part 293

Noahide News Part 294

Noahide News Part 295 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 296

Noahide News Part 297

Noahide News Part 298

Noahide News Part 299

Noahide News Part 300

Noahide News Part 301

Noahide News Part 302

Noahide News Part 303 yap yap yap

Noahide News Part 304

Noahide News Part 305

Noahide News Part 306

Noahide News Part 307

Noahide News Part 308

Noahide News Part 309

Noahide News Part 310

Noahide News Part 311

Noahide News Part 312

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News part 313

Noahide News Part 314

Noahide News part 315

Noahide News Part 316

Noahide News Part 317

Noahide News Part 318

Noahide News Part 319

Noahide News Part 320

Noahide News Part 321 Sanhedrin Alert !

Noahide News Part 322

Noahide News Part 323

Noahide News Part 324

Noahide News Part 325

Noahide News Part 326

Noahide News Part 327

Noahide News Part 328

Noahide News Part 329

Noahide News Part 330

Noahide News Part 331

Noahide News Part 332

Noahide News Part 333

Noahide News Part 334

Noahide News Part 335

Noahide News Pat 336

Noahide News Part 337

Noahide News Part 338

Noahide News Part 339

Noahide News Part 340

Noahide News Part 341

Goon Squad 3 Do you Understand?

Goon Squad 4 Can you hear, you who Partake?

Goon Squad 5

Goon Squad 6

Goonsquadtheseven

Goonsqad8thefallenaway

Noahide News Part 342

Noahide News Part 343

Noahide News Part 344

Noahide News Part 345

Noahide News Part 346

Noahide News Part 347

Noahide News Part 348

Noahide News Part 349

Noahide News Part 350

Noahide News Part 351

No to Noahide

Noahide News Part 352

Noahide News Part 353

Noahide News Part 354

Noahide News Part 355

Noahide News Part 356

Noahide News Part 357

Noahide News Part 358

Noahide News Part 359

Noahide News Part 360

Noahide News Part 361

Noahide News Part 362

Noahide News Part 363

Noahide News Part 364

Noahide News Part 365

Noahide News Part 366

Noahide News Part 367

Noahide News Part 368

Noahide News Part 369

Noahide News Part 370

Noahide News Part 371

Noahide News Part 372

Noahide News Part 373

Noahide News Part 374

Noahide News Part 375

Noahide News Part 376

Noahide News Part 377

Noahide News Part 378

Noahide News Part 379

Noahide News Part 380

Noahide News Part 381

Noahide News Part 382

Noahide News Part 383

Noahide News Part 384

Noahide News Part 385

Noahide News Part 386

Noahide News Part 387

Noahide News Part 388

Noahide News Part 389

Noahide News Part 390

Noahide News Part 391

Noahide News Part 392

Noahide News Part 393

Noahide News Part 394