Feb. 13 , 2006 AD of Our LORD Jesus the Christ the Creator
Happy "New World Odor"
Talmudic Dragon Moon CalendarShevat 16, 5766 , their Babylonian times of their Babylonian Sumerian Doctrine and laws 5766
Ps:118:24: This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.
of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.
Apostate Amaraka, you have made the Judeo-Churchinsanity Covenant with Death and Hell, Beware.......for the time is ripe for a great Harvest
Thousands(Millions) would (Will) die in US strikes on Iran, says study
The report, Iran: Consequences of a War, written by Professor Paul Rogers and published by the Oxford Research Group, draws comparisons with Iraq. It says the civilian population in that country had three weeks to prepare for war in 2003, giving people the chance to flee potentially dangerous sites. But Prof Rogers says attacks on Iranian facilities, most of which are in densely populated areas, would be surprise ones, allowing no time for such evacuations or other precautions.
The death toll would eventually be much higher if Iran took retaliatory action and the United States responded, or if the US took pre-emptive military action in addition to strikes on nuclear sites.
Prof Rogers, of the University of Bradford's peace studies department, says: "A military operation against Iran would not ... be a short-term matter but would set in motion a complex and long-lasting confrontation. It follows that military action should be firmly ruled out and alternative strategies developed."
The Long Con War
US and other western critics of Tehran say the government there is intent on securing a nuclear weapons capability. The Iranians deny this, saying they are pursuing civilian nuclear energy. The issue could still be resolved diplomatically, but both the US and Israel have said the option of air strikes remains open.
Prof Rogers says the aim of an attack would be to set back Iran's nuclear programme by at least five years. He says Britain could be drawn in as US aircraft would probably use UK bases.
He lists the expected targets as the Tehran Research Reactor, a radioisotope production facility, a range of nuclear-related laboratories, and the Kalaye Electric Company, all in Tehran, and facilities in Isfahan and Natanz.
"The new reactor nearing completion at Bushehr would be targeted, although this could be problematic once the reactor is fully fuelled and goes critical some time in 2006," he says. "Once that has happened, any destruction of the containment structure could lead to serious problems of radioactive dispersal affecting not just the Gulf coast but west Gulf seaboards in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates."
He adds: "All the initial attacks would be undertaken more-or-less simultaneously, in order to kill as many of the technically competent staff as possible, therefore doing the greatest damage to longer-term prospects."
Iran would be unable to prevent such an attack, as it has only limited air defences. But Prof Rogers says it has a large arsenal of responses. It could:
· withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty and pursue speedy development of nuclear weapons capability;
· encourage retaliatory action against Israel by the Lebanese-based Hizbullah group, which has missiles capable of hitting Haifa and several other Israeli cities;
· close the Strait of Hormuz, one of the main access routes for oil from the Gulf;
· send Iranian paramilitary units into states such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates;
· or order Iranian Revolutionary Guards to step up links with insurgents in Iraq.
Prof Rogers says a US or Israeli attack could also help al-Qaida by increasing the anti-US mood in the region and beyond.
February 9, 2006
By PETER PHIILLIPS
The leadership class in the US is now dominated by a neo-conservative(Talmudic Jews and their Sanhedrin led Judeo-Noahide proselytes of freemasonry) group of some 200 people who have the shared goal of asserting US military power worldwide. This Global Dominance Group, in cooperation with major military contractors, has become a powerful force in military unilateralism and US political processes.
A long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant ruling class in the US, which sets policy and determines national political priorities. C. Wright Mills, in his 1956 book on the power elite, documented how World War II solidified a trinity(Iron Triangle)
Is the Iron Triangle Complete? Yep, George W. Bush stated on January, he has
completed the iron triangle. ( or is it truly the iron pyramid of the god of
of power in the US that comprised corporate, military and government elites in a centralized power structure working in unison through "higher circles" of contact and agreement.
Neo-conservatives (Talmudic Hassidim Chabad Lubavitch in Pentagon) promoting the US Military control of the world (Noahide Global enforcement) are now in dominant policy positions within these higher circles of the US. Adbusters magazine summed up neo-conservatism as: "The belief that Democracy, however flawed, was best defended by an ignorant public pumped on nationalism and religion. Only a militantly nationalist state could deter human aggression Such nationalism requires an external threat and if one cannot be found it must be manufactured."
In 1992, during Bush the First's administration, Dick Cheney supported Lewis Libby and Paul Wolfowitz in producing the "Defense Planning Guidance" report, which advocated US military dominance around the globe in a "new order." The report called for the United States to grow in military superiority and to prevent new rivals from rising up to challenge us on the world stage.
3: And a mighty king shall stand up, that shall rule with great dominion, and do according to his will.
4: And when he shall stand up, his kingdom shall be broken, and shall be divided toward the four winds of heaven; and not to his posterity, nor according to his dominion which he ruled: for his kingdom shall be plucked up, even for others beside those.
At the end of Clinton's administration, global dominance advocates founded the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Among the PNAC founders were eight people affiliated with the number-one defense contractor Lockheed-Martin, and seven others associated with the number-three defense contractor Northrop Grumman. Of the twenty-five founders of PNAC twelve were later appointed to high level positions in the George W. Bush administration.
In September 2000, PNAC produced a 76-page report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. The report, similar to the 1992 Defense Policy Guidance report, called for the protection of the American(Jerisdiction ITSREALHELL Via HJR 104, PL 102-14 Homelandt SAYKurity led by the Russian RED Sofiet Talmudic Jew Chert-off) Homeland, the ability to wage simultaneous theater wars, perform global constabulary roles, and the control of space and cyberspace.
Gobal Satanic Anti-Christ Force and Noahide Enforcement
It claimed that the 1990s were a decade of defense neglect and that the US must increase military spending to preserve American geopolitical leadership as the world's superpower. The report also recognized that: "the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event such as a new Pearl Harbor." The events of September 11, 2001 presented exactly the catastrophe that the authors of Rebuilding America' Defenses theorized were needed to accelerate a global dominance agenda.
Olso and the Rabin assassination
5: And the king of the south shall be strong, and one of his princes; and he shall be strong above him, and have dominion; his dominion shall be a great dominion.
6: And in the end of years they shall join themselves together; for the king's daughter of the south shall come to the king of the north to make an agreement: but she shall not retain the power of the arm; neither shall he stand, nor his arm: but she shall be given up, and they that brought her, and he that begat her, and he that strengthened her in these times.
Bush's Talmudic thousand sparks of light Gulf war for ITSREALHELL
7: But out of a branch of her roots shall one stand up in his estate, which shall come with an army, and shall enter into the fortress of the king of the north, and shall deal against them, and shall prevail:
8: And shall also carry captives into Egypt their gods, with their princes, and with their precious vessels of silver and of gold; and he shall continue more years than the king of the north.
9: So the king of the south shall come into his kingdom, and shall return into his own land.
10: But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress.
11: And the king of the south shall be moved with choler, and shall come forth and fight with him, even with the king of the north: and he shall set forth a great multitude; but the multitude shall be given into his hand.
12: And when he hath taken away the multitude, his heart shall be lifted up; and he shall cast down many ten thousands: but he shall not be strengthened by it.
The Attack of the Shembol of Aholah Dan....WTC 911, by Aholibah the King of the south
Brought "Purim Iraq"
13: For the king of the north shall return, and shall set forth a multitude greater than the former, and shall certainly come after certain years with a great army and with much riches.
The resulting permanent war on terror has led to massive government defense spending, the invasions of two countries, and the threatening of three others, and the rapid acceleration of the neo-conservative plans for military control of the world.
14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
The US now spends as much for defense as the rest of the world combined. The Pentagon's budget for buying new weapons rose from $61 billion in 2001 to over $80 billion in 2004. Lockheed Martin's sales rose by over 30% at the same time, with tens of billions of dollars on the books for future purchases. From 2000 to 2004, Lockheed Martins stock value rose 300%. Northrup-Grumann saw similar growth with DoD contracts rising from $3.2 billion in 2001 to $11.1 billion in 2004. Halliburton, with Dick Cheney as former CEO, had defense contracts totaling $427 million in 2001. By 2003, they had $4.3 billion in defense contracts, of which approximately a third were sole source agreements.
At the beginning of 2006 the Global Dominance
Group's agenda is well established within higher circle policy councils and
cunningly operationalized inside the US Government. They work hand in hand with
defense contractors promoting deployment of US forces in over 700 bases
There is an important difference between self-defense from external threats, and the belief in the total military control of the world. When asked, most working people in the US have serious doubts about the moral and practical acceptability of financing world domination.
15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.
16: But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed.
Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and Director of Project Censored a media research organization. www.project.censored.org
A more in-depth review of the global dominance
group's agenda and a list of the 200 advocates see: http://www.projectcensored.org/
By Rev. Ted Pike
Today Canadian Christians who publicly criticize homosexuality or blame Jewish leaders for the crucifixion are likely to be indicted as "hate criminals." But in 1971 when B'nai B'rith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress persuaded Parliament to enact their national anti-hate law, these Jewish organizations were wary of alarming Christians. Instead, they began anti-hate law enforcement by going after those least likely to be defended by society: Holocaust reductionists - those who reduce the six million figure of Jewish Holocaust dead.
During the following 30 years, the Canadian public watched passively as Malcolm Ross, Doug Collins, Ernst Zundel, etc., were pilloried by the press and financially exhausted by the courts for the "hate crime" of inquiring whether the number of Jewish Holocaust dead might be less than six million.
Then, around the turn of the century, B'nai B'rith's hate crimes gestapo turned on Christians. More cases have now been prosecuted against Christians (primarily critics of homosexuality) in the last five years than of Holocaust reductionists in the previous 30.
Today holocaust reductionists, Ernst Zundel and Germar Rudolf, have been deported from what they thought was safe haven in America. They face prosecution in Germany for violation of its B'nai B'rith anti-hate law which makes it a "thought crime" to diminish the six million figure of Jewish Holocaust victims.
David Irving, perhaps the world's best-known and respected Holocaust reductionist was arrested and imprisoned several days ago in Austria under its B'nai B'rith hate law.
Also, lesser-known Belgian reductionist Siegfried Verbeke has been arrested in Holland and is awaiting deportation to Germany. Although not a German citizen, a German judge issued an international arrest warrant against him for the German crime of Holocaust reduction.
And, on September 19, Belgian reductionist Vincent Reynouard's house was ransacked by police. He was subjected to more than three hours of detention and hostile questioning. He is free on probation only if he submits to a psychiatric examination and ceases all Holocaust reductionist activities.
Long Arm of Zionist "Justice"
On June 20, 2004 the Jerusalem Post reported that Israel's Knesset empowered the State of Israel to criminalize anyone in the world who publicly reduces the six million figure. The government is now authorized to request extradition to Israel of such alleged "hate criminals" from any nation. Israel can also seize, prosecute, and imprison them should they set foot in Israel.
After Rudolf and Zundel have been tried in German and Austrian courts, Israel can request that they be extradited to stand trial in Israel for their "hate crimes." The American government, not having hate laws, acceded to deportation of Rudolf and Zundel. Germany and Austria, with hate laws in place, are much more likely to comply with Israel's possible demand.
Clearly, we are in the first stages of implementation of the Knesset deportation program. The public is being conditioned to approve the seizure and deportation of anyone who questions Zionism's dubious "Holocaust reality."
Yet tomorrow it will not just be Holocaust reductionists but also Christians who will be shipped to foreign courts. For Knesset, there exists a much greater crime, a crime they believe has caused unimaginable physical and mental Jewish suffering through the last two millennia. This is the accusation, rooted in the New Testament, that Jews were responsible for the crucifixion of Christ. Knesset believes the Holocaust was the result of centuries of New Testament bias, calling Jews "Christ-killers."
Of course, the New Testament does lay blame for Christ's death on Jewish leaders and the mob they incited (Acts 2:36, 3:13-15, etc.). Consequently, evil Jewish leaders today consider the New Testament "hate literature." Millions of Christians who believe the New Testament are thus considered anti-Semites.
The same SANHEDRIN, the same Hassidic Pharisee's who are Chabad Lubavitch, and they Now control Berlin, Paris, China, Russia, London and Washington DC and the Sanhedrin anti-Christ, as well as Judeo-Churchinsanity
Who Will Be Deported Next?
Today, Knesset wants Holocaust reductionists persecuted and shipped to Israel. But what of tomorrow? Considering the much greater offense of "Christian anti-Semitism," it is inevitable that Knesset should also declare such anti-Semites to be criminals.
It is highly significant that Christ, describing last days' persecution of believers, states that such oppression will originate with evil Jewish leaders and that Christians may be deported to Israel for prosecution. He said they will "deliver you to the courts (Sanhedrin), and you will be flogged in the synagogues " (Mark 13:9, NAS).
Yet according to ADL/B'nai B'rith's "Report on Global Anti-Semitism," ghostwritten for the U.S. State Department's new Dept. of Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith says that not only are those who claim Jews killed Christ 2,000 years ago anti-Semitic but so are all "strong" critics of Jews, matters Jewish, Jewish leaders, and the state of Israel.
This means that not only courageous Christians and pastors but also talk show hosts, publishers, anti-war activists, etc. will be liable for imprisonment or deportation. This is not a theoretical danger; it has already happened to those who reduced the number of Holocaust victims.
We Must Identify our Enemy
ADL/Knesset will not be restrained by protests to the U.S. Department of Immigration, the Supreme Court, or Germany. They will, however, be thwarted by massive public awareness of their role in the creation of hate crime/deportation laws.
This can be done through talk shows, the Internet, letters to the editor, calls to Congress, and discussions in conservative groups and Sunday school classes. Documentation of ADL invention of hate laws is found in my video, "Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians," and at www.truthtellers.org or www.adl.org.
ADL's (Beware ADL is Aholibah and is not Dan Amaraka Aholah of the Hassidim of Sanhedrin, the RED Sofiet Talmudic Chabad Vipers of HELL) program to destroy Christian civilization can only go forward deceptively, behind the scenes. If patriotic Americans only react to the effects of ADL initiatives yet do not identify the source of these evils, ADL's power is not curtailed. It is not enough to chop off tentacles of evil ADL legislation because, like the proverbial octopus, ADL continues working in Congress and the media, regenerating assaults on freedom.
Both are WHORES, Aholibah and her sister Aholah
We must go to the very eye of this anti-Christ beast, courageously raising understanding of ADL/Knesset (Sanhedrin) inspiration behind hate laws and resulting deportation demands. Only by massive public awareness of the ADL/Knesset threat can our nation resist increasing global pressure to submit to international hate crimes jurisdiction.
Evil Jewish leaders over the past century have, as "God's chosen people," enjoyed immunity from criticism by most evangelicals. That must change. It's time for the unholy alliance between Christians and such leadership to end. If it doesn't, the monster we have helped create will devour us.
Beware of the scribes and the Pharisees
GEMARA. It has been taught: [The blasphemer is not punished] unless he 'blesses' the Name, by the Name.2 Whence do we know this? Samuel said: The Writ sayeth, And he that blasphemeth [nokeb] the name of the Lord when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death.3 How do you know that the word nokeb4 [used in the Hebrew] means a 'blessing'? From the verse, How shall I curse [Ekkob]5 whom God hath not cursed;6 whilst the formal prohibition is contained in the verse, thou shalt not revile God.7 But perhaps it means 'to pierce,'8 as it is written, [So Jehoiada the priest took a chest,] and bored [wa-yikkob]9 a hole in the lid of it,10 the formal injunction against this being the verses, Ye shall destroy the names of them [idols] out of that place. Ye shall not do so unto the Lord your God?11 The Name must be 'blessed' by the Name, which is absent here. But perhaps the text refers to the putting of two slips of parchment, each bearing the Divine Name, together, and piercing them both? In that case one Name is pierced after the other.12 But perhaps it prohibits the engraving of the Divine Name on the Point of a knife and piercing therewith [the Divine Name written on a slip of parchment]? In that case, the point of the knife pierces, not the Divine Name. But perhaps it refers to the pronunciation of the ineffable Name, as it is written, And Moses and Aaron took these men which are expressed [nikkebu]13 by their names;14 the formal prohibition being contained in the verse, Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God?15 Firstly, the Name must be 'blessed' by the Name, which is absent here; and secondly, it is a prohibition in the form of a positive command, which is not deemed to be a prohibition at all.16 An alternative answer is this: The Writ saith, [And the Israelitish woman's son] blasphemed wa-yikkob17 [and cursed],18 proving that blasphemy [nokeb] denotes cursing. But perhaps it teaches that both offences must be perpetrated?19 You cannot think so, because it is written, Bring forth him that hath cursed,20 and not 'him that hath blasphemed and cursed', proving that one offence only is alluded to.
Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin.21 It would have been sufficient to say], 'A man, etc:' What is taught by the expression any man?22 The inclusion of heathens, to whom blasphemy is prohibited just as to Israelites, and they are executed by decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by decapitation.23
Now, is [the prohibition of blasphemy to heathens] deduced from this verse? But it is deduced from another, viz., The Lord, referring to the 'blessing' of the Divine Name.24 R. Isaac the smith25 replied; This phrase ['any man'] is necessary only as teaching the inclusion of substitutes of God's name,26 and the Baraitha is taught in accordance with R. Meir's views For it has been taught: Any man that curseth his God shall bear his sin.27 Why is this written? Has it not already been stated, And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death?28 Because it is stated, And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death, I might think that death is meted out only when the ineffable Name is employed. Whence do I know that all substitutes [of the ineffable Name] are included [in this law]? From the verse, Any man that curseth his God shewing culpability for any manner of blasphemy [even without uttering the Name, since the Name is not mentioned in this sentence]: this is the view of R. Meir. But the Sages maintain: [Blasphemy] with use of the ineffable Name, is punishable by death: with the employment of substitutes, it is the object of an injunction. [but not punishable by death].
This view [of R. Isaac the smith] conflicts with that of R. Miyasha; for R. Miyasha said: If a heathen [son of Noah] blasphemed, employing substitutes of the ineffable Name, he is in the opinion of the Sages punishable by death. Why so? Because it is written, as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land [when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death].29 This teaches that only the stranger [i.e.. a proselyte], and the native [i.e., a natural born Israelite] must utter the ineffable Name; but the heathen is punishable even for a substitute only. But how does R. Meir interpret the verse, 'as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land'? It teaches that the stranger and citizen are stoned, but a heathen is decapitated. (Goyim Gentile) For I would think, since they are included [in the prohibition], they are included [in the manner of execution too]: hence we are taught otherwise. Now how does R. Isaac the smith interpret the verse, 'as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land', on the view of the Rabbis?30 It teaches that only a stranger and a native must revile the Name by the Name, but for a heathen this is unnecessary. Why does the Torah state any man?31 The Torah employed normal human speech.32
Our Rabbis taught: seven precepts were the sons of Noah commanded: social laws;33 to refrain from blasphemy, idolatry; adultery; bloodshed; robbery; and eating flesh cut from a living animal.34
Whence do we know this? R. Johanan answered: The Writ saith: And the Lord God commanded the man saying, of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat.3 And [He] commanded, refers to [the observance of] social laws, and thus it is written, For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment.4 The Lord is [a prohibition against] blasphemy, and thus it is written, and he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death.5 God is [an injunction against] idolatry, and thus it is written, Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.6 The man refers to bloodshed [murder], and thus it is written, Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed.7 Saying refers to adultery, and thus it is written, They say, If a man put away his wife, and she go from him, and became another man's.8 Of every tree of the garden but not of robbery.9 Thou mayest freely eat but not flesh cut from a living animal.10
When R. Isaac came,11 he taught a reversed interpretation. And He commanded refers to idolatry; God [Heb. elohim] to social law. Now 'God' may rightly refer to social laws, as it is written, And the master of the house shall be brought unto elohim [i.e., the judges] (The Seventy Elders who sit on the seat of Moses) .12 But how can 'and He commanded' connote a prohibition of idolatry? R. Hisda and R. Isaac b. Abdimi-one cited the verse, They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made them a molten calf, etc.13 And the other cited, Ephraim is oppressed and broken in judgment, because he willingly walked after the commandment.14 Wherein do they differ? In respect of a heathen who made an idol but did not worship it: On the view [that the prohibition of idolatry is derived from] they have made them a molten calf, guilt is incurred as soon as the idol is made [even before it is worshipped]; but according to the opinion that it is from, because he willingly walked after the commandment, there is no liability until the heathen actually follows and worships it. Raba objected: Does any scholar maintain that a heathen is liable to punishment for making an idol even if he did not worship it? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish Court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen; but those for which a Jewish Court inflicts no capital penalty on Jewish delinquents are not forbidden to him.15 Now what does this exclude? Presumably the case of a heathen who made an idol without worshipping it?16 R. Papa answered: No. It excludes the embracing and kissing of idols.17 Of which idols do you say this? Is it of those whose normal worship is in this manner; but in that case he is surely liable to death? Hence it excludes the embracing and kissing of idols which are not usually worshipped thus.
'Social laws.' Were then the children of Noah bidden to observe these? Surely it has been taught: The Israelites were given ten precepts at Marah, seven of which had already been accepted by the children of Noah, to which were added at Marah social laws, the Sabbath, and honouring one's parents; 'Social laws,' for it is written, There [sc. at Marah] he made for them a statute and an ordinance;18 'the Sabbath and honouring one's parents'. for it is written, As the Lord thy God commanded thee!19 R. Nahman replied in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: The addition at Marah was only in respect of an assembly, witnesses, and formal admonition.20 If so, why say 'to which were added social laws'?21 But Raba replied thus: The addition was only in respect of the laws of fines.22 But even so, should it not have been said, 'additions were made in the social laws'? But R. Aha b. Jacob answered thus: The Baraitha informs us that they were commanded to set up law courts in every district and town. But were not the sons of Noah likewise commanded to do this? Surely it has been taught: Just as the Israelites were ordered to set up law courts in every district and town, so were the sons of Noah likewise enjoined to set up law courts in every district and town! But Raba answered thus: The author of this Baraitha [which states that social laws were added at Marah] is a Tanna of the School of Manasseh, who omitted social laws and blasphemy23 [from the list of Noachian precepts] and substituted emasculation and the forbidden mixture [in plants, ploughing. etc.].23 For a Tanna of the School of Manasseh taught: The sons of Noah were given seven precepts. viz., [prohibition of] idolatry, adultery, murder, robbery, flesh cut from a living animal, emasculation and forbidden mixtures. R. Judah said: Adam was prohibited idolatry only, for it is written, And the Lord God commanded Adam.24 R. Judah b. Bathyra maintained: He was forbidden blasphemy too. Some add social laws. With whom does the following statement of Rab Judah in the name of Rab agree: viz., [God said to Adam,] I am God, do not curse Me; I am God, do not exchange Me for another; I am God, let My fear be upon you?25 This agrees with the last mentioned [who adds social laws to the list].
Now, what is the standpoint of the Tanna of the School of Manasseh? If he interprets the verse, And the Lord God commanded etc. [as interpreted above], he should include these two [social laws and blasphemy] also, and if he does not, whence does he derive the prohibition of the rest? In truth, he does not accept the interpretation of the verse, 'And the Lord God commanded etc., but maintains that each of these [which he includes] is separately stated: Idolatry and adultery.
The Goal, Destroy Christianity, Christ Jesus whom they reject for the "Robber"
R. Joseph said, The scholars23 stated: A heathen is executed for the violation of three precepts Mnemonic G Sh R24 viz., adultery, bloodshed, and blasphemy. R. Shesheth objected: Now bloodshed is rightly included, since it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed;25 but whence do we know the others? If they are derived from bloodshed,26 the other four should also be included; whilst if their inclusion is taught by the extending phrase any man,27 should not idolatry too be included?28 But R. Shesheth said thus: The scholars stated, A heathen is executed for the violation of four precepts [including idolatry]. But is a heathen executed for idolatry? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen. This implies that they are merely forbidden, but their violation is not punished by death! R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: Their prohibition is their death sentence.29
R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples of Rab maintained: A heathen is executed for the violation of the seven Noachian laws; the Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it applies to all. Now is a heathen executed for robbery? Has it not been taught: 'With respect to robbery if one stole or robbed30 or [seized] a beautiful woman,31 or [committed] similar offences,32 if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean33 against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'?34 But if robbery is a capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? Because the second clause wishes to state, 'but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained,' therefore the former clause reads, '[theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept.'35 But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: 'For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty'?36 How else could that clause have been taught? Could he state, 'forbidden' 'permitted'? Surely it has been taught; A Cuthean and a [Jewish] shepherd of small cattle [sheep, goats, etc.]37 need neither be rescued [from a pit] nor may they be thrown [therein]!38 'And similar acts.' To what can this apply in the case of robbery? R. Aha b. Jacob answered: To a worker in a vineyard [who eats of the grapes]. When so? If his is the finishing work, it is permitted?39 If it is not the finishing work, is it not actual robbery?40 But R. Papa said: This applies to [the theft of] an article worth less than a perutah.41 But if so, why say that such robbery of a Jew by a Cuthean must not be kept: does he not forgive him?42 Though he later forgives him, he is grieved when it occurs [therefore it is prohibited] But how can you say that such robbery by one Cuthean from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a Cuthean does not forgive,43 is it not actual theft? But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered; It applies to the withholding of a labourer's wage.44 One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted.45 To what can 'a similar act' apply in the case of a beautiful woman? When R. Dimi came,46 he said in the name of R. Eleazar in the name of R. Hanina: To a heathen who allotted a bondwoman to his slave [for concubinage] and then took her for himself, for this he is executed.47
'A similar act', however, is not taught with reference to murder.48 Abaye said: If it should be, however, that it is so taught, it would be in accordance with R. Jonathan b. Saul. For it has been taught; If one was pursuing his neighbour to slay him, and the latter could have saved himself by maiming a limb [of the pursuer, e.g., his foot], and did not thus save himself [but killed him instead],
Part 2: Address by the Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson,
He, has put in the heart of the President of this country ("The king's heart is in the hand of the L-rd," cf. Proverbs 21:1) the desire to proclaim and publicize to all the citizens of this country -
with the approval of the representatives of the people of the land
R. Jacob b. Aha found it written in the scholars'2 Book of Aggada:3 A heathen is executed on the ruling of one judge, on the testimony of one witness, without a formal warning, on the evidence of a man, but not of a woman, even if he [the witness] be a relation. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. Whence do we know all this? Rab Judah answered: The Bible saith, And surely your blood of your lives will I require;4 this shows that even one judge [may try a heathen].5 At the hand of every living thing will I require it: even without an admonition having been given;6 And at the hand of man: even on the testimony of one witness;7 at the hand of man:8 but not at the hand [i.e., on the testimony] of a woman; his brother: teaching that even a relation may testify. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. What is R. Ishmael's reason? Because it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man within [another] man, shall his blood be shed.9 What is a man within another man? An embryo in his mother's womb.10 But the first Tanna [who excludes the murder of an embryo from capital punishment] is a Tanna of the school of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation. He connects the [second] 'man' with the latter half of the sentence, and interprets thus: Whoso sheddeth man's blood, within man [i.e., within him], shall his blood be shed. Now, how can man's blood be shed, and yet be retained within him? By strangulation.
R. Hamnuna objected: Now, is not a [heathen] woman commanded [to keep the social laws]? Surely it is written, For I know him, that he will command his sons and his household [which includes the womenfolk] after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord to exercise charity, and judgment?11 He raised the objection, and he answered it himself: he would command 'his sons' to exercise judgment; 'his daughters' to perform charity.
R. Awia the elder said to R. Papa: Let us say that a heathen woman who committed murder must not be executed, since it is written, at the hand of every man [who committed murder] etc. implying,12 'but not at the hand of woman'? He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: Whoso sheddeth man's blood implies whosoever it be [even a woman]. Let us say that a heathen woman who committed adultery is not executed, since it is written, therefore shall a man forsake [his father and mother, and cleave to his wife], implying12 that a man [must cleave], but not a woman? He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: The verse, And they shall be as one flesh, reassimilated them to each other [making the law of fidelity applicable to both].
Our Rabbis taught: [A man, a man shall not approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness.13 It would have been sufficient to state,] A man shall not approach etc. What is taught by the repetition, A man, a man? The extension of the law to heathens, that they too are forbidden incest [including adultery]. Now is this deduced from this verse; is it rather not deduced from a different text, viz., [And the lord God commanded ] saying, which refers to adultery?14 The latter text refers to adultery with a woman of their own [i.e., with a heathen married woman]; the former to adultery with one of ours [i.e., a Jewish married woman], for the second clause teaches: If he committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law. With regard to what is this?15 R. Nahman said in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: With regard to an assembly, witnesses and formal admonition.16 Is a Jewess then of less account?17 But R. Johanan answered thus: It is with regard to a betrothed Jewish maiden,18 whose violation by heathen law is not a capital offence;19 hence they are judged by Jewish law.
But if their offence was against a fully married woman, are they judged according to their law? Surely it has been taught: 'If a heathen committed adultery with a [Jewish] betrothed maiden, he is stoned; with a fully married woman, he is strangled.' Now if we judged them according to the law pertaining to them, should he not be decapitated? R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: By a 'married woman' this Baraitha means one whose huppah ceremony20 has been performed, but without the marriage being consummated. Since by their law her violation is not a capital offence, they are judged by ours. For R. Hanina taught: They recognise the inviolability of a woman whose union has been consummated, but not if she merely entered the huppah without the union having been consummated. It has been taught in agreement with R. Johanan: All prohibited [sexual] relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens, but those for which a Jewish Beth din (Temple) does not impose death are permitted to heathens; this is R. Meir's view. But the Sages maintain: There are many relationships21 for which a Jewish Beth din does not impose death, which are nevertheless forbidden to a Gentile. If a heathen committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law; if with a heathen woman, he is judged according to heathen law. The only difference that this makes is with respect to a betrothed maiden.22 But should not the Tanna include a woman whose huppah ceremony has been performed without the marriage being consummated? The teacher of this Baraitha is the Tanna of the college of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation, and by both codes [Jewish and heathen] this last-mentioned offence is punished by strangulation.
Now, is R. Meir of the opinion that all relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens? Surely it has been taught: A proselyte,
Alert ! Alert! Alert!
Keep in mind......
e-mail from the Hassidic anti-Christ Pharisaic Chabad Lovtobitch (Lubavitch) Sanhedrin of the Dragon....rabid rib-eye Dov Stein
דואר אלקטרוני email@example.com אתר אינטרנט www.beith-din.com
From: Southern American Marketing, Inc. [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 6:32 PM
Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. ... Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha.... .... And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. Committee for Israeli Victory
E-mail from Dov Stein, Sanhedrin 1-26-2006
all the Kings of the earth are deceived
Judge Roy Moore another shemsham of Shame
Letter to pastor of the church I attended at one time
Chertoff the Talmudic Hassidic Chabad Lubavitch anti-Christ Sanhedrin "Son of the Devil"
Katrina Report Spreads Blame
By Spencer S. Hsu
The Washington Post
Sunday 12 February 2006
Homeland Security, Chertoff singled out.
Hurricane Katrina exposed the U.S. government's failure to learn the lessons of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, as leaders from President Bush down disregarded ample warnings of the threat to New Orleans and did not execute emergency plans or share information that would have saved lives, according to a blistering report by House investigators.
A draft of the report, to be released publicly Wednesday, includes 90 findings of failures at all levels of government, according to a senior investigation staffer who requested anonymity because the document is not final. Titled "A Failure of Initiative," it is one of three separate reviews by the House, Senate and White House that will in coming weeks dissect the response to the nation's costliest natural disaster.
The 600-plus-page report lays primary fault with the passive reaction and misjudgments of top Bush aides, singling out Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security Operations Center and the White House Homeland Security Council, according to a 60-page summary of the document obtained by The Washington Post. Regarding Bush, the report found that "earlier presidential involvement could have speeded the response" because he alone could have cut through all bureaucratic resistance.
The report, produced by an 11-member House select committee of Republicans chaired by Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.), proposes few specific changes. But it is an unusual compendium of criticism by the House GOP, which generally has not been aggressive in its oversight of the administration.
The report portrays Chertoff, who took the helm of the department six months before the storm, as detached from events. It contends he switched on the government's emergency response systems "late, ineffectively or not at all," delaying the flow of federal troops and materiel by as much as three days.
Purim Saints of NOLA
The White House did not fully engage the president or "substantiate, analyze and act on the information at its disposal," failing to confirm the collapse of New Orleans's levee system on Aug. 29, the day of Katrina's landfall, which led to catastrophic flooding of the city of 500,000 people.
Six Shot Dead Military Men at the Levy by NOLA Police.....??????
On the ground, Federal Emergency Management Agency director Michael D. Brown, who has since resigned, FEMA field commanders and the U.S. military's commanding general set up rival chains of command. The Coast Guard, which alone rescued nearly half of 75,000 people stranded in New Orleans, flew nine helicopters and two airplanes over the city that first day, but eyewitness reconnaissance did not reach official Washington before midnight.
At the same time, weaknesses identified by Sept. 11 investigators - poor communications among first responders, a shortage of qualified emergency personnel and lack of training and funding - doomed a response confronted by overwhelming demands for help.
"If 9/11 was a failure of imagination then Katrina was a failure of initiative. It was a failure of leadership," the report's preface states. "In this instance, blinding lack of situational awareness and disjointed decision making needlessly compounded and prolonged Katrina's horror."
Chertoff spokesman Russ Knocke said, "every ounce of authority" and "100 percent of everything that could be pre-staged was pre-staged" by the federal government before landfall once the president signed emergency disaster declarations on Aug. 27. Brown had "all authority" to make decisions and requests, and his "willful insubordination . . . was a significant problem" for Chertoff, Knocke said.
White House spokesman Trent Duffy said Bush had full confidence in his homeland security team, both appointed and career. "The president was involved from beginning to end," implementing emergency powers before the storm and taking responsibility afterward, Duffy said.
Duffy objected to a leaked draft of an unpublished report, and said the White House is completing its own study. "The president is less interested in yesterday, and more interested with today and tomorrow," he said, "so that we can be better prepared for next time."
for he is directed by his Daf Yomi of Talmud Bavli
The report puts the government response in a larger context and offers a few new details. In months of hearings, House and Senate investigative committees have already revealed the lack of White House awareness of events on the ground, political infighting between federal and state leaders, delays in ordering evacuations and the meltdown of FEMA operations.
The review, launched Sept. 15, suggests that federal funding be used to update state evacuation studies. It proposes making commercial airliners available in an emergency and creating a database to provide a national clearinghouse of shelter data. It also suggests naming a professional disaster adviser to the president, akin to the military's chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Democrats, whose leaders considered the investigation a partisan whitewash and boycotted it, called for Chertoff's removal. Reps. Charlie Melancon (D-La.) and William J. Jefferson (D-La.),who informally participated in the inquiry, renewed calls for an independent commission styled after the one that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks, saying that the investigation, while comprehensive, was rushed, failed to compel the White House to turn over documents and held no administration officials accountable.
House investigators acknowledge that after reviewing nine hearings, scores of interviews and 500,000 pages of documents, they "will never know" what would have happened had federal, Louisiana and New Orleans officials activated plans and called on the military before the storm, and evacuated the city sooner than Aug. 28. However, the committee found U.S. disaster preparedness - individual, corporate, philanthropic and governmental - remains dangerously inadequate.
"All the little pigs built houses of straw," it wrote. "Katrina was a national failure, an abdication of the most solemn obligation to provide for the common welfare."
The report reconstructs a chronology of events over a three-week span from Aug. 22 to Sept. 12. It focuses primarily on failures by Chertoff and the rest of the administration to execute a year-old National Response Plan and set up a related command structure, designed to marshal resources in the critical first 72 hours after a catastrophe.
The report said the single biggest federal failure was not anticipating the consequences of the storm. Disaster planners had rated the flooding of New Orleans as the nation's most feared scenario, testing it under a catastrophic disaster preparedness program in 2004.
About 56 hours before Katrina made landfall, the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center cited an "extremely high probability" that New Orleans would be flooded and tens of thousands of residents killed.
Given those warnings, the report notes Bush's televised statement on Sept. 1 that "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees," and concludes: "Comments such as those . . . do not appear to be consistent with the advice and counsel one would expect to have been provided by a senior disaster professional."
As the president's principal disaster adviser, Chertoff poorly executed many decisions, including declaring Katrina an "incident of national significance" - the highest designation under the national emergency response plan and convening an interagency board of experienced strategic advisers on Aug. 30 instead of Aug. 27; designating an untrained Brown to take charge of the disaster; and failing to invoke a federal plan that would have pushed federal help to overwhelmed state and local officials rather than waiting for them to request it.
The report said Chertoff was "confused" about Brown's role and authority, and that it was unclear why he chose him, given his lack of skills and his hostility to FEMA's downgrading under new plans.
After failing to foresee the need to muster buses, boats and aircraft, the next critical federal mistake was failure to confirm catastrophic levee breaches, the report asserts.
Despite a FEMA official's eyewitness accounts of breaches starting at 7 p.m. on Aug. 29, the president's Homeland Security Council, led by homeland security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend and her deputy, Ken Rapuano, did not consider them confirmed until 11 hours later, on Aug. 30.
The first federal order to evacuate New Orleans was not issued until 1:30 a.m. Aug. 31, and came only after FEMA's ground commander in New Orleans, Phil Parr, put out a call for buses after finding water lapping at the approaches to the Superdome, where about 12,000 victims were camped.
The council's "failure to resolve conflicts in information and the 'fog of war,' not a lack of information, caused confusion," the House panel wrote. It added that the crisis showed the government remains "woefully incapable" of managing information, much as it was before the 2001 attacks.
The summary obtained by The Post generally praises pre-storm evacuations by Gulf Coast leaders, but it criticizes preparations and decisions by Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D) and New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin (D), who knew that 100,000 city residents had no cars and relied on public transit. The city's failure to complete its mandatory evacuation, ordered Aug. 28, led to hundreds of deaths, the report said.
Neighboring Plaquemines Parish, by contrast, issued its order Aug. 27, helping to hold the number of storm deaths there at three. Nursing homes outside New Orleans were able to find special transportation for patients, while at least one in the city could not find bus drivers by the time people were told to leave.
The investigation also condemned "hyped media coverage of violence and lawlessness, legitimized by New Orleans authorities," for increasing security burdens, scaring away rescuers and heightening tension in the city.
It faulted Nagin for repeating, in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, rumors of armed gangs committing rapes and murder in an "almost animalistic state." The report said few cases of gunshots or violence were confirmed, although it acknowledged that few police were able to investigate and victims may have had little incentive to report crime.
Net and Yahoo of Aholah Dan, the TBN Telly tubby Noahide favorite son, squares off against Olmert of Judah, Aholibah for the battle of the seat of King David. They are playing Double speak double cross Globally. Putim is part og the scheme for he is led by his hassidic handler Beral Lazar Chabad Lubavitch rib-eye between the BEARS teeth
Netanyahu: "Olmert is Detached from
12:59 Feb 13, '06 / 15 Shevat 5766
By Hillel Fendel
|Likud Chairman Netanyahu says that Acting Prime Minister Olmert is dangerously ignoring the Hamas rise to power.|
The "I Told you So" Hassidic son of Sanhedrin
of Satan, says
Netanyahu similarly criticised the media for underplaying the Hamas dangers. When Army Radio interviewer Razi Barkai said, "OK, we've exhausted the diplomatic topic, let's discuss something else," Netanyahu laughed and said,
"I know that the media has its limitations, but to think that we've exhaused this topic in two minutes is simply a joke. We have just undergone a veritable earthquake, with the rise of a fundamentalist-Islamic terrorist organization to power, giving it the ability to create another Iran right on our border - and we just pass over it as if it were nothing."
Olmert, in one of his first public speeches since assuming Prime Ministerial duties a month ago, said last night that his Kadima Party is the only alternative for the Israeli public: "On the right is a conservative party that is detached from reality and buried in slogans of the past - the Likud - while on the left is a radical socialist party led by Amir Peretz."
Olmert also said, "A government headed by myself will not conduct any negotiations with Hamas."
Both the Likud and Labor responded sharply to Olmert's speech. A Labor Party response attacked Olmert's mention of a seven-year plan to fight poverty: "The amount he spends on cigars is more than the minimum wage."
The Likud initiated a campaign today emphasizing the Russian invitation to Hamas - and the French half-hearted approval of such - as an indication of Olmert's perceived weakness. "Putin and Chirac are giving Olmert a lesson," the new Likud slogan states.
Kadima's new slogan is, "Israel is stronger than Bibi."
Netanyahu told Army Radio today,
"Olmert reveals inexperience in his attempts to deal with a complex reality that can be dealt with. He allowed Hamas to vote in Jerusalem, gave it money, brought the partition wall closer to central Israel, and now, after the horses have run away, he wants to close the barn doors that he left open."
Since Sharon would not have allowed Sanhedrin Dan to have their Hamas in power, he was conveniently "Removed". Olmert played into Sanhedrin's plan, Netanyahoo of Sanhedrin is now capitalizing on it, playing the Hamas Fear Factor. Hamas will do exactly what Sanhedrin wants, in order to enslave the palestinian's via their Noahide Laws
Upon seizing the reins of government, the new
Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.
... Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade
PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.
Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens
within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile
courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the
existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically
rewritten to conform to halacha.... .... And law and order will be
fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in
accordance with Torah law. Committee for Israeli Victory
Netanyahu was asked twice if he regards Olmert as unfit to serve as Prime Minister. Despite his harsh criticism of Olmert, Netanyahu preferred to dodge this question - apparently in order to leave open the option of the Likud's joining an Olmert-led government in the future.
The Likud candidate continued,
"The Likud will build a wall against Hamas with international help, and we will ensure that the Jordan Valley and Judean Valley remain a part of the State.
Judea and Samaria of DAN..Jor-DAN
.. It must be understood that Hamas is not Fatah. You have to listen to them and believe them. Olmert will withdraw in order to enable another Iran to be built here. I have to tell the public the truth: This danger can be reduced.
see Dov Steins e-mail fom Sanhedrin
Beware, for the WAR unto desolation is
"There is no difference between Kadima and Labor, they are both left-wing parties. Olmert has taken Peres, and Chaim Ramon, and Dalia Itzik. There is a choice: Either the Likud policies that foresee developments, or a policy of illusions led by Olmert, leading to continued strengthening of Hamas."
In order to snare the masses to the Talmudic Judeo-Chruchinsanity Scofield, Chosen jew shem sham of shame, of the Prophets of Baal, they must make is seem as though Russia will go against Israel, in order to get their Global WAR.
This is not the RED Dan of the RED Sofiet Talmudic North who is now in control of Moscow, Washington DC, London, Paris, Beijing and Berlin, and controls the Sanhedrin, which now is converging on spiritual ISRAEL, them by faith in Christ Jesus, his saints
But a Ruse of deception for Global Noahide enforcement
If you are one, who fell for the C.I Scofield, Darby, Lehaye Secret Rapture deception, I advise you REPENT immediately in Jesus the Christ, The ONLY Everlasing Father. For along with your deception, you now say that the god of the jews is your god, and the jews say that Jesus is a bastard son of a whore and a Roman Soldier, their god who is no god, has no Only Begotten SON the Savior, and they seek to slay any man, woman or child who worships Jesus, by the power and the working of Satan whom they serve
Russia Joins Worldwide Islamic Jihad
08:03 Feb 13, '06 / 15 Shevat 5766
|A7 Radio's "Weekend Edition" with Tamar Yonah and Malkah Fleisher|
Russian President Vladimir Putin has shocked the world by inviting the
radical islamic terrorist organization, Hamas, to visit Russia. Stating that Russia never considered Hamas to be a terrorist organization, Putin is raising the question - will there be another Cold War? Plus: Iran expels International Atomic Energy Agency surveillance systems - will Iran go nuclear? How many pounds of weaponry will be loaded on to long-range B2 bombers aimed at Iran?
They are dividing
the earth for their gain....Beware
Venezuela ready to receive Hamas visit 'with pleasure'
By The Associated Press
Venezuela said Monday it would welcome leaders
from the Hamas movement "with pleasure" if they visit the country as
part of a South American tour following victory in Palestinian elections.
Asked if the Venezuelan government will receive the Islamic militant group, Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel told reporters, "Of course we will. What is the problem?"
"If they come, with pleasure," Rangel said. "They've just won an election."
The United States, the European Union
and the United Nations have insisted they would not deal with a Hamas-led
Palestinian Authority and threatened to withhold hundreds of millions of
dollars in aid unless the group recognizes Israel and renounces violence.
Hamas, responsible for scores of deadly attacks against Israelis, has refused to renounce its calls for Israel's destruction or give up its weapons.
The United States and Europe consider Hamas a terrorist organization.
President Hugo Chavez, however, frequently criticizes what he calls U.S. imperialist dominance in world affairs, and has often expressed sympathy for the Palestinian cause.
The leftist leader has said his government will be one of the first to recognize an independent Palestinian state.
Rangel said earlier this month that Hamas was expected to visit Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia and Venezuela as part of a regional tour to celebrate its electoral victory. On Monday, he said he didn't know when Hamas would arrive because the visit was not yet confirmed.
Moscow offered to meet this month with Hamas leaders.
Zech:12:11: In that day shall there be a great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon
Rv:16:16: And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/682299.htmlLast update - 16:03 13/02/2006
Study: U.S. attack on Iran would spark conflict involving Israel
LONDON - A United States attack on Iran could
eventually lead to a lengthy confrontation involving many other countries in
the region, including Israel, a British think tank said in a report released on
"A U.S. military attack on Iranian nuclear infrastructure would be the start of a protracted military confrontation that would probably involve Iraq, Israel and Lebanon as well as the United States and Iran, with the possibility of west Gulf States being involved as well," it said.
According to the Oxford Research Group report, thousands of military personnel and hundreds of civilians would be killed if the U.S. launched an air strike on Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear arms.
The report said any bombing of Iran by
U.S. forces, or by Israel, would have to be part of a surprise attack that
would inevitably catch many Iranians unprotected.
An attack could lead to the closure of the Gulf at the Straits of Hormuz and would probably have a substantial impact on oil prices, as well as spurring new attacks by Muslim radicals on Western interests, the report said.
"Military deaths in [the] first wave of attacks against Iran would be expected to be in the thousands, especially with attacks on air bases and Revolutionary Guard facilities," said the report by Paul Rogers of the University of Bradford.
"Civilian deaths would be in the many hundreds at least," it said. "If the war evolved into a wider conflict, primarily to pre-empt or counter Iranian responses, the casualties would eventually be much higher."
Western states suspect Iran of secretly aiming to build a nuclear bomb. Tehran says its nuclear facilities are intended to produce only electricity.
The U.S. and Israel have said they would prefer to solve the dispute through diplomacy but have not ruled out military action.
The report said an attack by the U.S. or Israel on Iran would probably spur Tehran to work as rapidly as possible towards developing a nuclear military option.
It said U.S. forces, already tied down in Iraq, would have a limited number of military options when dealing with Iran and would have to rely almost entirely on the air force and navy.
Any attack would almost certainly unify Iran and bolster the government in Tehran, and mean that any future U.S. relationship with Iran would have to be based on violence, the report said.
A military response to the crisis would be a "particularly dangerous option and should not be considered further," the report concluded.
____Last update - 21:21 13/02/2006
Israeli envoys to play up Hamas links to Chechen separatists
By The Associated Press
Outraged by Moscow's(Aholah) overtures to Hamas, Israel (Aholibah) has told its diplomats to play up alleged ties between the Palestinian militants and Chechens fighting to break away from Russia, Israeli political sources said on Monday.
"The idea is to show the Russians
and others that there is no difference between Hamas terrorism and Chechen
terrorism," said a political source who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Hamas denies having links to the Chechen separatists.
"It is widely known that Hamas does not intervene in the internal affairs of other sovereign countries," said group spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri. "Attempts by Israel to isolate Hamas internationally, politically and economically have failed."
Russia has been fighting a Chechen insurgency since 1994 when it sent troops into the southern province to quell what later became an Islamist-led bid for independence. It says it is confronting mercenaries financed by "international terrorism."
The rebels say fighters from outside Russia are among them, but there has been no mention of Palestinian involvement.
The pamphlet circulated by Israel's Foreign Ministry was compiled by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, a think-tank staffed by former Israeli intelligence operatives.
"We would ask you to bring the contents of this report to the attention of opinion-shapers in the communities where you are based," said an attached memo addressed to diplomats, a copy of which was seen by Reuters.
Brain Dead Judeo-Churchinsanity
The pamphlet cites posters celebrating Hamas and Chechen leaders as Islamic warriors, which it says were distributed by the Palestinian militant group at West Bank universities and an orphanage in 2004 and later seized by Israeli troops.
No military or financial cooperation is alleged.
Hamas suicide bombings helped spearhead a Palestinian revolt that erupted in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip in 2000. Asked if his group supported the Chechen cause in principle, Abu Zuhri declined comment.
ging up the Temple mount, spearheaded the WAR unto desolation, WTC, IRAQ
War and Now the INTERNATIONAL Clash of Civilzations...........of the Sanhedrin
Beast for the Dragon they serve the murderer from the beginning
Putin has said that, unlike the United States and European Union, Russia does not consider Hamas a terrorist organisation.
Bushitlers,Talmudic Land of the Brave, "we do not torture"
Report: US Is Abusing Captives
By Maggie Farley
The Los Angeles Times
A UN inquiry says the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, which at times amounts to torture, violates international law.
New York - A draft United Nations report on the detainees at Guantanamo Bay concludes that the US treatment of them violates their rights to physical and mental health and, in some cases, constitutes torture.
It also urges the United States to close the military prison in Cuba and bring the captives to trial on U.S. territory, charging that Washington's justification for the continued detention is a distortion of international law.
The report, compiled by five U.N. envoys who interviewed former prisoners, detainees' lawyers and families, and U.S. officials, is the product of an 18-month investigation ordered by the U.N. Commission on Human Rights. The team did not have access to prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.
Nonetheless, its findings - notably a conclusion that the violent force-feeding of hunger strikers, incidents of excessive violence used in transporting prisoners and combinations of interrogation techniques "must be assessed as amounting to torture" - are likely to stoke U.S. and international criticism of the prison.
Nearly 500 people captured abroad since 2002 in Afghanistan and elsewhere and described by the U.S. as "enemy combatants" are being held at Guantanamo Bay.
"We very, very carefully considered all of the arguments posed by the U.S. government," said Manfred Nowak, the U.N. special rapporteur on torture and one of the envoys. "There are no conclusions that are easily drawn. But we concluded that the situation in several areas violates international law and conventions on human rights and torture."
The draft report, reviewed by the Los Angeles Times, has not been officially released. U.N. officials are in the process of incorporating comments and clarifications from the U.S. government.
In November, the Bush administration offered the U.N. team the same tour of the prison given to journalists and members of Congress, but refused the envoys access to prisoners. Because of that, the U.N. group declined the visit.
Nowak said he did not expect major changes to the report's conclusions and recommendations as a result of the U.S. government's response, though there would be amendments on minor issues.
Navy Lt. Cmdr. J.D. Gordon, a spokesman for the Pentagon, said the Defense Department did not comment about U.N. matters.
The report is not legally binding. But human rights and legal advocates hope the U.N.'s conclusions will add weight to similar findings by rights groups and the European Parliament.
"I think the effect of this will be to revive concern about the government's mistreatment of detainees, and to get people to take another look at the legal basis," said Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch. "There are lots of lingering questions about how do you justify holding these people."
The report focuses on the U.S. government's legal basis for the detentions as described in its formal response to the U.N. inquiry: "The law of war allows the United States - and any other country engaged in combat - to hold enemy combatants without charges or access to counsel for the duration of hostilities.
Especially if you are the Talmudic "War President" of LONG War, Unto desolation
Detention is not an act of punishment, but of security and military necessity. It serves the purpose of preventing combatants from continuing to take up arms against the United States."
In real wars they just shoot you on front lines
But the U.N. team concluded that there had been insufficient due process to determine whether the more than 750 people who had been detained at Guantanamo Bay since January 2002 were "enemy combatants," and determined that the primary purpose of their confinement was for interrogation, not to prevent them from taking up arms. The U.S. has released or transferred more than 260 detainees from Guantanamo Bay.
It also rejected the premise that "the war on terrorism" exempted the U.S. from international conventions on torture and civil and political rights.
The report said some of the treatment of detainees met the definition of torture under the U.N. Convention Against Torture: the acts were committed by government officials, with a clear purpose, inflicting severe pain or suffering against victims in a position of powerlessness.
gawd Bliss Amaraka
The findings also concluded that the simultaneous use of several interrogation techniques - prolonged solitary confinement, exposure to extreme temperatures, noise and light; forced shaving and other techniques that exploit religious beliefs or cause intimidation and humiliation - constituted inhumane treatment and, in some cases, reached the threshold of torture.
Nowak said that the U.N. team was "particularly concerned" about the force-feeding of hunger strikers through nasal tubes that detainees claimed were brutally inserted and removed, causing intense pain, bleeding and vomiting.
"It remains a current phenomenon," Nowak said.
International Red Cross guidelines state: "Doctors should never be party to actual coercive feeding. Such actions can be considered a form of torture and under no circumstances should doctors participate in them on the pretext of saving the hunger striker's life."
One detainee, a Kuwaiti named Fawzi Al Odah, told his lawyer this month that he stopped his five-month hunger strike under threats of physical abuse.
Thomas B. Wilner, a lawyer at Shearman & Sterling in Washington who has represented 12 Kuwaitis held at Guantanamo Bay, said that Odah told him that in December guards began taking away clothes, shoes and blankets from about 85 hunger strikers.
Wilner said Odah described guards mixing laxatives into the liquid formula they gave to about 40 prisoners through the nose tubes, causing them to defecate on themselves.
In Jesus Mighty Name, Keeel All em dirty Arabs, Right? Churchinsanity Bloodlusters of the Murderer? Bush is a man of Gawd, right? Jesus said KILL any who oppose Bush....right? and your chosen massah race is your damned Talmudic jews? Right.........wrong, and you are all damned into eternal shame
Wilner said Odah told him that on Jan 9, an officer read what he said was an order from Guantanamo Bay's commander, Brig. Gen. Jay W. Hood, stating that hunger strikers would be strapped into a restraint chair and force-fed with thick nasal tubes that would be inserted and removed twice a day. After hearing a neighboring prisoner scream in pain and tell him not to go through it, Odah reluctantly ceased his hunger strike, Wilner said.
"I stopped it because they forced me to stop," Wilner quoted Odah as telling him. "They stopped it through torture."
Pentagon officials said the number of hunger strikers had dropped to four.
Officials have been force-feeding detainees since August, but they started leaving the long nasal tubes in place in September after detainees complained that having them jammed down their noses to their stomachs and removed twice a day caused intense pain, bleeding, vomiting and fainting, Wilner said.
In January, he said, after harsh treatment resumed and hunger strikers were left strapped in the restraint chair in their own excretions, most gave up their protest.
"It is clear that the government used force to end the hunger strike," Wilner said. "It was brutality purposely applied to them to make them stop."
White House spokesman Scott McClellan dismissed Odah's claims Thursday.
Scott McClellan the Spokesperson of the Noahide beast
"Well, yes, we know that Al Qaeda is trained in trying to make wild accusations and so forth," McClellan said in response to a question about Odah. "But the president has made it very clear what the policy is, and we expect the policy to be followed. And he's made it very clear that we do not condone torture, and we do not engage in torture."
We do however lie in every breath, said the spokesperson
Wilner said Odah had not been accused of being part of Al Qaeda.
The International Red Cross is the only party allowed by the U.S. government to have access to prisoners and monitor their physical and mental health, but the organization is forbidden from making its findings public.
and are of Blasphemy and TREASON, too.
The five U.N. envoys are independent experts appointed by the U.N. Commission on Human Rights to examine arbitrary detention, torture, the independence of judges and lawyers, freedom of religion and the right to physical and mental health.
The five had each been following the situation at Guantanamo Bay since it opened in January 2002. They decided in June 2004 to do a joint report and asked the U.S. government for access to all detention centers.
"This report is not aimed at criticizing," Nowak said. "It is looking at what international human rights law says about Guantanamo. We are hoping that this report will actually strengthen the dialogue."
The Follies of the Sanhedrin's Chief Jester, Bushitler is Being revealed
Uproar as Saddam returns to court
Saddam Hussein attended court in traditional Arab dress
The former Iraqi leader shouted "Down with Bush" and continued a stormy exchange with the new chief judge who he says is biased and wants removed.
The defendants are accused of killing 148 Shia villagers in Dujail in 1982.
The trial was adjourned until Tuesday but not before two ex-Saddam aides complained of being forced to testify.
The former head of Saddam Hussein's office, Ahmed Khudayir, and the former chief of foreign intelligence, Hassan al-Obeidi, both blocked questions.
Amid threats of a continued boycott, the chief prosecutor had asked new chief judge, Raouf Abdul Rahman, to bring Saddam Hussein and his co-defendants to the Baghdad court by force if necessary.
On entering court, Saddam Hussein said: "They have forcibly brought me here."
He told the judge: "Exercise your right to try me in absentia. Are you trying to overcome your own smallness?"
The former leader wore a blue traditional Arab robe and a black jacket in contrast to the suit he had worn previously.
"Down with the traitor, down with traitors, down with Bush. Long live the ummah (Islamic nation)... long live the ummah... long live the ummah," Saddam Hussein shouted.
His half-brother Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti scuffled with guards as he was brought in.
Both then continued to harangue the judge throughout the early proceedings, refusing orders to sit down and be quiet.
"This is not a court, this is not a court, this is a game," Saddam Hussein shouted.
Barzan Ibrahim sat on the floor with his back to the judge.
Judge Rahman said he was implementing laws that Saddam Hussein had put in place.
The judge rejected claims that the defence lawyers had been thrown out, saying they had chosen not to attend.
Failure to show
The prosecution brought Mr Khudayir and Mr Obeidi to the witness stand to try to link Saddam Hussein's leadership directly with the killings in Dujail. The defendants deny all the charges.
Mr Khudayir headed Saddam Hussein's presidential office from 1995 to the fall of the regime. He attended a military planning session on 9 April 2003, two days before the Americans entered Baghdad.
But he said he knew nothing of the events at Dujail in 1982.
"I am not fit to be a witness in this case," he said.
When shown a document, purported to contain his signature, which apparently showed Saddam Hussein had ratified "the execution of the Dujail detainees", Mr Khudayir said: "I don't remember. I don't remember anything at all."
Mr Obeidi said he was being forced to appear as a witness and refused to testify. Saddam Hussein laughed as he spoke.
The new chief judge took over last month after the resignation of chief judge Rizgar Amin and has adopted a more hardline approach to the defendants.
Saddam Hussein and some of his co-defendants failed to show up at the past few sessions.
The BBC's Jon Brain in Baghdad says the
prosecution was aware that the spectacle of an empty dock risked further
undermining a trial that has repeatedly descended into farce.
But he says if the defendants were brought in by force, defence lawyers would
argue it proved their claim that the judge was biased towards the prosecution.
But he says if the defendants were brought in by force, defence lawyers would argue it proved their claim that the judge was biased towards the prosecution.
Gore Laments U.S.
'Abuses' Against Arabs
Feb 12 9:08 PM US/Eastern
By JIM KRANE
Associated Press Writer
JIDDAH, Saudi Arabia
Former Vice President Al Gore told a mainly Saudi
audience on Sunday that the U.S. government committed "terrible
abuses" against Arabs after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and
that most Americans did not support such treatment.
Gore said Arabs had been "indiscriminately
rounded up" and held in "unforgivable" conditions. The
former vice president said the Bush administration was playing into al-Qaida's
hands by routinely blocking Saudi visa applications.
"The thoughtless way in which visas are now handled, that is a
mistake," Gore said during the Jiddah Economic Forum. "The worst thing
we can possibly do is to cut off the channels of friendship and mutual
understanding between Saudi Arabia and the United States."
Gore told the largely Saudi audience, many of them educated at U.S.
universities, that Arabs in the United States had been "indiscriminately
rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa or not having a green
card in proper order, and held in conditions that were just unforgivable."
"Unfortunately there have been terrible abuses and it's wrong,"
Gore said. "I do want you to know that it does not represent the desires or
wishes or feelings of the majority of the citizens of my country."
On Iran, Gore complained of "endemic hyper-corruption" among
Tehran's religious and political elite and asked Arabs to take a stand against
Iran's nuclear program.
Iran says its program is for peaceful purposes but the United States and
other Western countries suspect Tehran is trying to develop nuclear weapons.
"Is it only for the West to say this is dangerous?"
Gore asked. "We should have more people in this region saying this is
Several audience members criticized the United States for what they described
as "unconditional" U.S. support for Israel,
saying U.S. diplomats helped Israel flout U.N. resolutions that they enforced
when the measures targeted Arabs.
Gore refused to be drawn into questions about the Israeli-Palestinian
"We can't solve that long conflict in exchanges here," Gore said.
Also at the forum, the vice chairman of Chevron Corp., Peter Robertson, said
President Bush's desire to cut U.S. dependence on Mideast oil shows a
"misunderstanding" of global energy supply and the critical role of
In his State of the Union address this month, Bush pledged to cut U.S.
dependence on Middle East oil by 75 percent by 2025.
"This notion of being energy independent is completely
unreasonable," Robertson said at the economic forum, which opened Saturday.
"I believe Middle Eastern oil can and must play a certain role in the
system," Robertson said. "Saudi Arabia's massive resources will
continue to promote international energy security and serve as a moderating
force in balancing supply and demand."
Cherie Blair, wife of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, made a plea at the
forum for women's rights, telling Saudi leaders that the dearth of women in the
work force was "undermining economic potential" of the kingdom.
Irish President Mary McAleese urged Saudi Arabia to learn from Ireland's
economic transformation, which hinged on opening the country to the outside
world and ushering women into the workplace.
___ http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-02-13T153028Z_01_ L13432231_RTRUKOC_0_US-SYRIA-US-FOREX.xml&rpc=22 Syria switches to euro amid confrontation
DAMASCUS (Reuters) - Syria has switched all of the state's foreign currency
transactions to euros from dollars amid a political confrontation with the
United States, the head of state-owned Commercial Bank of Syria said on Monday. "This is a precaution. We are talking about billions of dollars,"
Duraid Durgham told Reuters. The bank, which still dominates the Syrian market although private banks have
been allowed to set up in the last few years, has also stopped dealing with
dollars in the international foreign exchange flows of private clients. The United States has been at the forefront of international pressure on
Syria for its alleged role in the assassination of former Lebanese Prime
Minister Rafik al-Hariri a year ago. Damascus denies
involvement in the killing. "It looks like a kind of pre-emptive action aimed at making their
foreign assets safer, preventing them from getting frozen in case of any
conflict," said a Middle East economist who requested anonymity Amaraka the Nation
of Lies, Murders, Thefts, Blasphemy and TREASON, gawd bliss her, and
Judeo-Apostasy says......amen and amen
Another Russian MP Says Muslim
Riots Were US Provocation Echoing the comments
of Liberal Democrats leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, another Russian MP has gone
public with his contention that the recent Muslim riots were a staged US
provocation in order to swing public opinion in Europe behind
supporting an attack on Iran. Gennady Zyuganov told a news conference that the
publication of the offensive cartoons was a "well thought-out major
provocation using newspapers and magazines to aggravate the situation, the
relationship between the European countries and the Muslim
world. Zyuganov (pictured below) said that the riots could only
benefit the US and that they were "not advantageous for Europe but those
who have raised this hysteria, insulted religious feelings
of one and a half billion of Muslims, are pushing Europe into the arms of the
American military clique. Last week, Vladimir Zhirinovsky
said that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a planned
psyop on the part of the US and aimed to provoke a row between Europe
and the Islamic world. It will all end with European countries thanking the
United States and paying, and giving soldiers, said Zhirinovsky. Although the riots have largely calmed, the build-up to a
military strike on Iran is intense, with newspapers
today reporting that the Pentagon had significantly advanced in its planning
for bombing raids and submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks on the
The coma and the conspiracy theory Monday, 13 February (43 days to
Forget monitoring vital signs. Monitor talkbacks.
The moment that Ariel Sharon takes a turn for the worse, the messages flood in. Thankfully, the great majority are wishes that he might not suffer, or prayers for a miracle recovery.
It is a measure of the unbearable meanness of the Internet, however, that the first to arrive are almost always those who wish him ill, wish him hell, or alternatively, those who voice the hope that he will live on to suffer through endless rounds of new surgeries and unimaginable cutting-edge bio-tech tortures.
Gore said Arabs had been "indiscriminately rounded up" and held in "unforgivable" conditions. The former vice president said the Bush administration was playing into al-Qaida's hands by routinely blocking Saudi visa applications.
"The thoughtless way in which visas are now handled, that is a mistake," Gore said during the Jiddah Economic Forum. "The worst thing we can possibly do is to cut off the channels of friendship and mutual understanding between Saudi Arabia and the United States."
Gore told the largely Saudi audience, many of them educated at U.S. universities, that Arabs in the United States had been "indiscriminately rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa or not having a green card in proper order, and held in conditions that were just unforgivable."
"Unfortunately there have been terrible abuses and it's wrong," Gore said. "I do want you to know that it does not represent the desires or wishes or feelings of the majority of the citizens of my country."
On Iran, Gore complained of "endemic hyper-corruption" among Tehran's religious and political elite and asked Arabs to take a stand against Iran's nuclear program.
Iran says its program is for peaceful purposes but the United States and other Western countries suspect Tehran is trying to develop nuclear weapons.
"Is it only for the West to say this is dangerous?" Gore asked. "We should have more people in this region saying this is dangerous."
Several audience members criticized the United States for what they described as "unconditional" U.S. support for Israel, saying U.S. diplomats helped Israel flout U.N. resolutions that they enforced when the measures targeted Arabs.
Gore refused to be drawn into questions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
"We can't solve that long conflict in exchanges here," Gore said.
Also at the forum, the vice chairman of Chevron Corp., Peter Robertson, said President Bush's desire to cut U.S. dependence on Mideast oil shows a "misunderstanding" of global energy supply and the critical role of Saudi Arabia.
In his State of the Union address this month, Bush pledged to cut U.S. dependence on Middle East oil by 75 percent by 2025.
"This notion of being energy independent is completely unreasonable," Robertson said at the economic forum, which opened Saturday.
"I believe Middle Eastern oil can and must play a certain role in the system," Robertson said. "Saudi Arabia's massive resources will continue to promote international energy security and serve as a moderating force in balancing supply and demand."
Cherie Blair, wife of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, made a plea at the forum for women's rights, telling Saudi leaders that the dearth of women in the work force was "undermining economic potential" of the kingdom.
Irish President Mary McAleese urged Saudi Arabia to learn from Ireland's economic transformation, which hinged on opening the country to the outside world and ushering women into the workplace.
Syria switches to euro amid confrontation with US
DAMASCUS (Reuters) - Syria has switched all of the state's foreign currency transactions to euros from dollars amid a political confrontation with the United States, the head of state-owned Commercial Bank of Syria said on Monday.
"This is a precaution. We are talking about billions of dollars," Duraid Durgham told Reuters.
The bank, which still dominates the Syrian market although private banks have been allowed to set up in the last few years, has also stopped dealing with dollars in the international foreign exchange flows of private clients.
The United States has been at the forefront of international pressure on Syria for its alleged role in the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri a year ago. Damascus denies involvement in the killing.
"It looks like a kind of pre-emptive action aimed at making their foreign assets safer, preventing them from getting frozen in case of any conflict," said a Middle East economist who requested anonymity
Amaraka the Nation of Lies, Murders, Thefts, Blasphemy and TREASON, gawd bliss her, and Judeo-Apostasy says......amen and amen
Another Russian MP Says Muslim Riots Were US Provocation
Echoing the comments of Liberal Democrats leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, another Russian MP has gone public with his contention that the recent Muslim riots were a staged US provocation in order to swing public opinion in Europe behind supporting an attack on Iran.
Gennady Zyuganov told a news conference that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a "well thought-out major provocation using newspapers and magazines to aggravate the situation, the relationship between the European countries and the Muslim world.
Zyuganov (pictured below) said that the riots could only benefit the US and that they were "not advantageous for Europe but those who have raised this hysteria, insulted religious feelings of one and a half billion of Muslims, are pushing Europe into the arms of the American military clique.
Last week, Vladimir Zhirinovsky said that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a planned psyop on the part of the US and aimed to provoke a row between Europe and the Islamic world.
It will all end with European countries thanking the United States and paying, and giving soldiers, said Zhirinovsky.
Although the riots have largely calmed, the build-up to a military strike on Iran is intense, with newspapers today reporting that the Pentagon had significantly advanced in its planning for bombing raids and submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks on the country.
The coma and the conspiracy theory
Monday, 13 February (43 days to
It is a measure of the unbearable, globalized meanness of our age, that you generally can't tell until the end of the letter whether the letter writer in question is a maniacal Palestinian - often resident in the Bay Area or the Rust Belt - or a foaming at the mouth settler wannabe - often writing from South Africa or Australia, or whether the war crime in question took place in Qibiya or Kfar Darom.
This time around, though, there was a whole new group, particularly evident on the Talkbacks of a competitive English Israel Website.
Within minutes of Ariel Sharon having been rushed to an operating theater for emergency abdominal surgery on a Sabbath morning, the debate was not should he die in pain or live in agony, but rather When Olmert Will Let Him Die for Maximal Electoral Advantage.
This group is clearly one of a number of what may be called Web Anthills, in which the members of a like-thinking e-clan instantaneously share the same take on a given issue.
In a sense, this is no conspiracy theory. Why not? Because, as far as the writers are concerned, (A.) It's no conspiracy, it's only Kadima, and (B.) It's no theory, because we all know it to be true.
The debate, which swirled while the operation was still in progress - an operation from which, hospital officials had cautioned, Sharon might well not emerge alive - offered a variety of dates for a state funeral, for maximum pro-Kadima effect.
One poster said that Kadima would deliberately keep Sharon in his vegetative state until a few days before the election - to minimize the "staleness" of the sympathy factor in keeping him alive until March 28. Then, the poster said, they will "pull the plug," to coincide with "massive tear-jerking television coverage," and world leaders attending a state funeral, all to Olmert's advantage.
Other talkback respondents voted for March 27, or other dates in between.
Mean or inappropriate as the letters may be, they still point to a valid political question, one that political commentators addressed at length this week:
What effect has Sharon's incapacitation had on the election race, and how might that influence change if the prime minister were to die?
A possible answer to the first question was hinted at during Army Radio's dawn news broadcast Sunday, when anchor Ronit Kfir noticed that there were barely six weeks left to the election.
"Only forty-four days left? That can't be. There's no campaign going on," she told the national radio audience.
Another indication came from a poll released on Sunday, which averaged in the results of all newspaper opinion surveys at the weekend. The most striking outcome was that the numbers, placing Kadima at 41 seats in the 120-seat Knesset, Labor at 20 and the Likud at 15-16, were the same figures as in a parallel survey compiled a month ago, just after it became clear that Sharon would not return to office.
Several senior political analysts were asked Sunday what the influence on the electorate would have been, had Sharon not survived the surgery on the Sabbath. Some of the answers, though considerably more judicious, bore an oblique resemblance to some of the Web posters.
"It's awful to talk about this, but there are politics and realpolitik involved, although among the Kadima people and Ariel Sharon's friends, these aren't the thoughts you sense they are thinking, rather, 'What can we do for him [the prime minister] now, so that this doesn't drag on for too long," said Ben Caspit of Maariv.
Still, according to Caspit, speaking on the radio Sunday, "In the end, we are all human beings, and when Sharon does go to the World of Truth, if and when, there will be two weeks of a 'festival' that will bring the entire world and its wife to land here, and in those two weeks, [Kadima] could rise from 40 to 50 seats, later sliding from 50 to 40, instead of sliding from 40 to 30.
In terms of picturing Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert as a world leader, Caspit continued, "something like this could certainly 'upgrade' him, a conversation with Bush, a conversation with Mubarak, with the Russians, the French, the British."
Added Raviv Drucker of Channel 10 Television, "Why discuss the 'if and when,' let's talk about the here and now. It's clear that it's much harder to run a negative campaign [against Kadima] when things like this happen."
"'When everyone aims for unity after the death of a prime minister, how can I put up something else,'" Drucker quoted one non-Kadima campaign manager as saying.
Moreover, the Kadima campaign is built on tearing one more day off the calendar each day, Drucker said, "and this 'supplies' a few more days."
If he had been slain, would you have heard of it?
White House under fire in Cheney shooting accident
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush knew hours after Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot a fellow quail hunter but the White House came under fire on Monday for not making the information public until the next day.
The victim, Harry Whittington, 78, took pellets in his cheek, neck and chest when Cheney fired his shotgun while aiming for a bird during a hunt in southern Texas on Saturday, and was in stable condition at a Corpus Christi hospital.
Whittington was in intensive care as a precautionary measure because he was "peppered by shotgun spray," said Peter Banko, administrator of Christus Spohn Hospital. His condition is "not critical, not serious. It's just stable at this time."
The accident happened around 5:30 p.m. on a private ranch about 200 miles south of San Antonio, where the vice president has hunted previously. Whittington was treated on the scene by Cheney's traveling medical detail before being taken by helicopter to the hospital.
The accident was not reported publicly by the vice president's office until Sunday afternoon and then only after an account provided by the ranch's owner appeared on the Web site of the Corpus Christi Caller-Times -- the local newspaper.
In a testy exchange with reporters on Monday, White House spokesman Scott McClellan was bombarded with questions about the propriety of a private citizen making public a shooting incident involving the vice president and whether Cheney had followed White House protocol.
McClellan said Bush and senior aides were first told by staff in the Situation Room that there had been an accident in Cheney's hunting party and that the president learned later on Saturday night that the vice president had been the shooter.
"I think he was informed in a relatively reasonable time," he said at the news briefing.
A LONG STORY
of the LONG Con
of the LONG war
of the WAR President of Sanhedrin ?
McClellan said the vice president's staff did not tell reporters about the accident on Saturday because they were concerned about getting Whittington medical attention and were still gathering facts.
Cheney and the owner of the property, Katharine Armstrong, then agreed that she should provide the information to the public about an accident that happened on her ranch
Insider reignites Iraqi
By Jim Lobe
WASHINGTON - The US intelligence community's top Middle East analyst from 2000 to 2005 has accused the George W Bush administration of distorting and politicizing intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq war.
In an article published on Friday in Foreign Affairs magazine, analyst Paul Pillar, who resigned from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) last year, also charges that the Bush administration ignored much of the analysis that had been prepared by the intelligence community, including its predictions of the chaos and conflict that followed the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. He argues that
the administration not only ignored the traditional model for separating the functions of policymakers - who are to make decisions based on facts and analyses developed by independent intelligence specialists - from those of the intelligence analysts themselves, but "turned the entire model upside down".
"The administration used intelligence not to inform decision-making, but to justify a decision already made," he wrote. "It went to war without requesting - and evidently without being influenced by - any strategic-level intelligence assessments on any aspect of Iraq."
Indeed, said Pillar, as the national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, the first request he received from the administration for such an assessment was not until a year after the March 2003 invasion.
Pillar's charges that the administration "cherry-picked" and otherwise manipulated the intelligence process in order to take the country to war are the most serious since the leak of the so-called "Downing Street Memo" to the London Sunday Times last May.
The memo, the minutes of a meeting of British Prime Minister Tony Blair's war cabinet in July 2002, quotes intelligence chief Alastair Campbell, who had just returned from a trip to Washington, as reporting that Bush "wanted to remove Saddam, through military action ..." and, to that end, "... the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy".
Carefully planned for shembolic
"Purim Saddam" March 17, 2003
The memo's contents - which bolstered charges by a number of retired US intelligence officers who had spoken out against the war - put the administration and its Republican backers on the Senate Intelligence Committee, on the defensive. The Republicans on the committee have stalled Democratic demands for an investigation of the administration's use of the prewar intelligence.
That Pillar, a witness - and a high-ranking one at that - has now publicly joined the chorus of critics with his own bill of particulars, marks a serious setback to Bush's Republican administration and one the Democrats are certain to seize on.
Senate minority leader Harry Reid called for investigation. "Evidence that the Bush White House manipulated and selectively declassified intelligence to wage a public relations campaign before, during and after the invasion of Iraq grows every day," he said.
Pillar's charges are also likely to be more difficult for the administration to refute in light of new disclosures on Thursday that I Lewis "Scooter" Libby - the former chief of staff of Vice President Dick Cheney who is now under indictment for lying to federal authorities about his role in "outing" a CIA operative - has since testified that he had been "authorized" by Cheney and other White House officials to leak classified information to reporters in the run-up to the war.
The purpose of those leaks, which continued after the war, according to The National Journal, which broke the story, was to "build public support" for going to war.
According to previously published reports, Libby acted as the liaison between the White House and special units in the Pentagon's policy office of former under secretary of defense, Douglas Feith. (Talmudic Hassidic Chabad Lubavitcher) Those units reviewed "raw intelligence", particularly related to alleged links between then Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda, and sent it directly to Cheney's office and the White House without submitting it for vetting by professional intelligence analysts.
In his article, which generally avoids naming specific individuals responsible for politicizing the intelligence process, Pillar explicitly identifies Feith's Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group as responsible for distorting the normal intelligence process in a number of ways - by supposedly discovering links between al-Qaeda and Saddam reported in the raw intelligence and by presenting "briefings [that] accused the intelligence community of faulty analysis for failing to see the supposed alliance" between the two.
While Pillar admits the intelligence community made serious mistakes in gauging the status of Saddam's alleged weapons programs, he charges that the Bush administration deliberately ignored the larger strategic judgments by the intelligence community - that "deterrence of Iraq was working, that Saddam was being kept 'in his box", and that the best way to deal with the weapons problem was through an aggressive inspections program to supplement the sanctions already in place".
"That the administration arrived at so different a policy solution indicates that its decision to topple Saddam was driven by other factors - namely, the desire to shake up the sclerotic power structures of the Middle East and hasten the spread of more liberal politics and economics in the region.
"If the entire body of official intelligence analysis on Iraq had a policy implication, it was to avoid war - or if war was going to be launched, to prepare for a messy aftermath. What is most remarkable about prewar US intelligence on Iraq is not that it got things wrong and thereby misled policymakers; it is that it played so small a role in one of the most important US policy decisions in recent decades."
Before the war, according to Pillar, the intelligence community also considered the main challenges that would be faced by any post-invasion authority in Iraq, and forecast "a deeply divided Iraqi society" that could erupt into "violent conflict" unless the occupying power "established security and put Iraq on the road to prosperity in the first few weeks or months after the fall of Saddam".
It also predicted that war and occupation would "boost political Islam and increase sympathy for terrorists' objectives - and Iraq would become a magnet for extremists from elsewhere in the Middle East".
But this assessment was undertaken only on the intelligence community's own initiative. The administration never requested such an analysis, according to Pillar.
As the administration marched to war in 2002 and 2003, according to Pillar, intelligence officers registered "varying degrees of private protest", particularly when the administration's public statements went "beyond what analysts deemed credible or reasonable", especially regarding the alleged existence of an al-Qaeda-Saddam alliance and Bush's assertion in his 2003 State of the Union address that Iraq had tried to buy uranium ore in Africa.
The intelligence community never backed up the al-Qaeda-Saddam connection, according to Pillar. "The enormous attention devoted to this subject did not reflect any judgment by intelligence officials that there was or was likely to be anything like the 'alliance' the administration said existed," he wrote.
"The reason the connection got so much attention was that the administration wanted to hitch the Iraq expedition to the 'war on terror' and the threat the American public fear most, thereby capitalizing on the country's militant post-9/11 mood.
"Feeding the administration's voracious appetite for material on the Saddam-al-Qaeda link consumed an enormous amount of time and attention at multiple levels, from rank-and-file counterterrorism analysts to the most senior intelligence officials. It is fair to ask how much other counterterrorism work was left undone as a result."
Pressure exerted by administration officials on intelligence analysts was seldom crude or direct, according to Pillar, who said they made their preferences known more subtly. "It was clear that the Bush administration would frown on or ignore analysis that called into question a decision to go to war and welcome analysis that supported such a decision. Intelligence analysts - for whom attention, especially favorable attention, from policymakers is a measure of success - felt a strong wind consistently blowing in one direction. The desire to bend with such a wind is natural and strong, even if unconscious."
The fact that Pillar published his article in Foreign Affairs, whose publisher, the Council on Foreign Relations, is headed by Richard Haass, a top adviser to former secretary of state Colin Powell, is also likely to bolster the critics who have charged the administration with politicizing intelligence.
Not only is the magazine the most influential foreign policy publication of its kind, but Haass, who resigned as head of Powell's policy office shortly after the war began, has repeatedly expressed bewilderment as to when the administration decided to go to war and why it did so.
Powell's chief of staff at the time, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, has also publicly charged that Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Feith's superior, formed a "cabal" that deliberately circumvented or manipulated the normal policymaking process, including the intelligence community, in order to take the country to war.
Noahide News Part 394
No to Noahide
The Last Deception
section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"
section 16 "The Beast Has Risen"
Daniel's Seventy Weeks
Was Peter a Jew?
The Two Witnesses
"The Whore of Babylon"
Are the " Ael-ians coming"
Wall Street " The Mark" is Here
Wall Street II
Wall Street III
It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"
Declared section Part II
"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"
Qabalah Part II
Qabalah Part III
National Identification Card
ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding
A Sincere Request to "Rapture" Teachers
Compulsory Constitutional Cremation
Homeland Security, "The Police State"
"The Fourth Beast"
The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah
The Scribes of Baal
How will they do it- " The false-christ"
False Christ Part II
Baal's food Tax
"The Changing of the Guards"
"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun
"Moshiach ben Lucifer"
Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"
"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)
I Witch, New One World Order Seal
Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah
Satan's Enforcers Part 2
Satan's Enforcers Part 3
Satan's Enforcers Part 4
The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith
Pledge of Allegiance Part Two
I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ
King of the Noachides
"Beware the Mark"
"Beware the Mark" part two
"Beware the Mark" Part 3
"Beware the Mark" Part Four
"Beware the Mark" Part Five
Harvest of Fear
"Harvest of Fear" Part Two
"Harvest of Fear" Part Three
National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement
Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?
The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba
The "Lessor Jew"
Temporary Coup d' Etat
The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?
The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !
Protocols Today Part Two
Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"
Identity of the Illuminati
The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch
Chabad Satan Part 1A
Chabad Satan Part 2
Chabad Satan Part 2A
Chabad Satan Part 2B
Chabad Satan Part 3
Chabad Satan Part 3A
Chabad Satan Part 4
Chabad Satan Part 4A
Chabad Satan Part 4B
Chabad Satan Part 4C
Chabad Satan Part 5
Chabad satan Part 5A
Chabad Satan Part 5B
Chabad Satan Part 5C
Chabad Satan Part 6
Chabad Satan Part 6B
Chabad Satan Part 6C
Chabad Satan Part 6D
Chabad Satan Part 7
Chabad Satan Part 7A
Chabad Satan Part 7B
Chabad Satan Part 7C
Chabad Satan Part 8
Chabad Satan Part 8A
Chabad Satan Part 8B
Chabad Satan Part 8C
Chabad Satan Part 8D
Chabad Satan Part 9
Chabad Satan Part 9A
Chabad Satan Part 9B
Chabad Satan Part 9C
Chabad Satan Part 9D
Chabad Satan Part 10
Chabad Satan Part 10A
Chabad Satan Part 10B
Chabad Satan Part 10C
Chabad Satan Part 10D
Chabad Satan Part 11
The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction
Chabad Wall Part 2
Chabad Wall Part 3
Chabad Wall Part 4
The Chabad Phoenix is Rising
Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"
Patriot Akt II, Comrad
The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"
Satan's One World Religion
OWR Part 2
OWR Part 3
OWR Part 4
Religion Part 5
World Religion Part 6 One
One World Religion Part 6
One WorldReligion Part 7 Religion Part 7
Re the god of Talmud Bavli
"The Raiser of Taxes"
Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764
The Final Nazi
Nazi Part 2
Nazi Part 3
Nazi Part 4
The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king
Changing the Time and the Laws
The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees
Exod-U.S the coming Geula
Who murdered Jesus the Christ
"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism
Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky
"The Two Whores"
Noahide News 2
Noahide News Part 3
Noahide News Part 4
Noahide News Part 5
Noahide News Part 6
Noahide News Part 7
Noahide News Part 8
Noahide News Part 9
Noahide News Part 10
Noahide News Part 11
Noahide News Part 12
Noahide News Part 13
Noahide News Part 14
Noahide News Part 15
Noahide News Part 16
Noahide News Part 17
Noahide News Part 18
Noahide News Part 19
Noahide News Part 20
Noahide News Part 21
Noahide News part 22
Noahide News Part 23
Noahide News part 24
Noahide News Part 25
Noahide News Part 26
Noahide News part 27
Noahide News Part 28
Noahide News Part 29
Noahide News Part 30
Noahide News Part 31
Noahide News Part 32
Noahide News Part 33
Noahide News Part 34
Noahide News Part 35
Noahide News Part 36
Noahide News Part 37
Noahide News Part 38
Noahide News Part 39
Noahide News Part 40
Noahide News Part 41
Noahide News Part 42
Noahide News Part 43
Noahide News Part 44
Noahide News Part 45
Noahide News Part 46
Noahide News Part 47
Noahide News Part 48
Noahide News Part 49
Noahide News Part 50
Noahide News Part 51
Noahide News Part 52
Noahide News Part 53
Noahide News Part 54
Noahide News Part 55
Noahide NewsPart 56
Noahide News Part 57
Noahide News Part 58
Noahide News Part 59
Noahide News Part 60
Noahide News Part 61
Noahide News Part 62
Noahide News Part 63
Noahide News Part 64
Noahide News Part 65
Noahide News Part 66
Noahide News Part 67
Noahide News Part 68
Noahide News Part 69
Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist
Noahide News Part 70
Noahide News Part 71
Noahide News Part 72
Noahide News Part 73
Noahide News Part 74
Noahide News Part 75
Noahide News Part 76
Noahide News Part 77
Noahide News Part 78
Noahide News Part 79
Noahide News Part 80
Noahide News Part 81
Noahide News Part 82
Noahide News Part 83ALERT ALERT ALERT
Noahide News Part 84
Noahide News Part 85
Noahide News Part 86
Noahide News Part 87
Noahide News Part 88
Noahide News Part 89
Noahide News part 90
Noahide News Part 91
Noahide News Part 92
Noahide News Part 93
Noahide News Part 94
Noahide News Part 95
Noahide News Part 96
Noahide News Part 97
Noahide News Part 98
Noahide News Part 99
Noahide News Part 100
Noahide News Part 101
Noahide News Part 102
Noahide News Part 103
Noahide News Part 104
Noahide News Part 105
Noahide News Part 106
Noahide News Part 107
Noahide News Part 108
Noahide News Part 109
Noahide News Part 110
Noahide News Part 111
Noahide News Part 112
Noahide News Part 113
Noahide News Part 114
Noahide Naws Part 115
Noahide News Part 116
Noahide News Part 117
Noahide News Part 118
Noahide News Part 119
Noahide News Part 120
Noahide News Part 121
Noahide News Part 122
Noahide News Part 123
Noahide News Part 124
Noahide News part 125
Noahide News Part 126
Noahide News Part 127
Noahide News Part 128
Noahide News Part 129
The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father
Noahide News Part 130
Noahide news Part 131
Noahide News Part 132
Noahide News Part 133
Noahide News Part 134
Noahide News Part 135
Noahide news Part 136
Noahide News Part 137
Noahide News Part 138
Noahide News Part 139
Noahide News Part 140
Noahide News Part 141
Noahide News Part 142
Noahide News Part 143 THE JEWISH RELIGION Its InfluenceToday
Noahide News Part 144
Noahide News Part 145
Noahide News Part 146
Noahide news Part 147
Noahide News Part 148
Noahide News Part 149
Noahide News Part 150
Noahide News Part 151
Noahide News Part 152
Noahide News Part 153
Noahide News Part 154
NoahideNews Part 155
Noahide News Part 156
Noahide News Part 157
Noahide News Part 158
Noahide News Part 159
Noahide News Part 160Noahide News Part 161
Noahide News Part 162
Noahide News Part 163
Noahide News Part 164
Noahide News Part 165
Noahide News part 166
Noahide News Part 167
Noahide News Part 168
Alert ! Noahide News Part 169 Alert ! Alert ! false Elijah cometh?
Noahide News Part 170
Noahide News Part 171
Noahide News Part 172
Noahide News Part 173
Noahide News Part 174
Noahide News Part 175
Noahide News Part 176
Noahide News Part 177
Noahide News Part 178
Noahide News Part 179
Noahide News Part 180
Noahide News Part 181
Noahide News Part 182
Noahide News Part 183
Noahide News Part 184
Noahide News Part 185
Noahide News part 186
Noahide News Part 187
Noahide News Part 188
Noahide News Part 189
Noahide News Part 190 Alert ! Alert! Alert!
Noahide News part 191
Noahide News part 192
Noahide News Part 193
Noahide News Part 194
Noahide News Part 195
Noahide News Part 196
Noahide News Part 197 Alert Alert Alert !
Noahide News part 198
Noahide News Part 199
Noahide News Part 200
Noahide News Part 201
Noahide News Part 202
Noahide News Part 203Alert Alert Alert !
Noahide News Part 204 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!
Noahide News Part 205
Noahide news Part 206
Noahide News Part 207
Noahide News Part 208
Noahide News Part 209
Noahide News Part 210
Noahide News Part 211
Noahide News Part 212
Noahide News Part 213
Noahide News Part 214
Noahide News Part 215
Noahide News Part 216
Noahide News Part 217
Noahide News Part 218
Noahide News Part 219Noahide News Part 220 Alert ! Alert!
Noahide News Part 221
Noahide News Part 222 Alert ! Alert!
Noahide News Part 223
Noahide News Part 224 Alert! Alert!
Noahide News part 225
Noahide News Part 226Noahide News Part 227
Noahide News Part 228 Alert! Alert! Alert!
Noahide News Part 229
Noahide News Part 230 Alert ! Alert!
Noahide News Part 231
Noahide News Part 232
Noahide News Part 233
Noahide News Part 234
Noahide News part 235
Noahide News Part 236
Noahide News part 237
Noahide News Part 238
Noahide News Part 239
Noahide News Part 240
Noahide News Part 241Alert ! Alert ! Alert!
Noahide News Part 242
Noahide News Part 243
Noahide News Part 244
Noahide News Part 245
Noahide News Part 246
Noahide News Part 247
Noahide News Part 248
Noahide News Part 249
Noahide News Part 250
Noahide News Part 251
Noahide News Part 252
Noahide News Part 253
Noahide News Part 254
Noahide News Part 255
Noahide News Part 256
Noahide News part 257
Noahide News Part 258
Noahide News Part 259
Noahide News Part 260
Noahide News Part 261
Noahide News Part 262
Noahide News Part 263
Noahide News Part 264
Noahide News Part 265
Noahide News Part 266
Noahide News Part 267
Noahide News Part 268
Noahide News Part 269
Noahide News Part 270
Noahide News Part 271
Noahide News Part 272
Noahide News Part 273
Noahide News Part 274
Noahide News Part 275
Noahide News Part 276
Noahide News Part 277
Noahide News Part 278
Noahide News Part 279
Noahide News Part 280
Noahide News Part 281
Noahide News Part 282
Noahide News Part 283
Noahide News Part 284
Noahide News Part 285
Saints of the Living God
Noahide News Part 286
Noahhide News Part 287
Noahide News Part 288
Noahide News Part 289
Goon squad part II
Noahide News Part 290
Noahide News Part 291
Noahide News Part 292
Noahide News Part 293
Noahide News Part 294
Noahide News Part 295 Alert ! Alert!
Noahide News Part 296
Noahide News Part 297
Noahide News Part 298
Noahide News Part 299
Noahide News Part 300
Noahide News Part 301
Noahide News Part 302
Noahide News Part 303 yap yap yap
Noahide News Part 304
Noahide News Part 305
Noahide News Part 306
Noahide News Part 307
Noahide News Part 308
Noahide News Part 309
Noahide News Part 310
Noahide News Part 311
Noahide News Part 312
The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father
Noahide News part 313
Noahide News Part 314
Noahide News part 315
Noahide News Part 316
Noahide News Part 317
Noahide News Part 318
Noahide News Part 319
Noahide News Part 320
Noahide News Part 321 Sanhedrin Alert !
Noahide News Part 322
Noahide News Part 323
Noahide News Part 324
Noahide News Part 325
Noahide News Part 326
Noahide News Part 327
Noahide News Part 328
Noahide News Part 329
Noahide News Part 330
Noahide News Part 331
Noahide News Part 332
Noahide News Part 333
Noahide News Part 334
Noahide News Part 335
Noahide News Pat 336
Noahide News Part 337
Noahide News Part 338
Noahide News Part 339
Noahide News Part 340
Noahide News Part 341
Goon Squad 3 Do you Understand?
Goon Squad 4 Can you hear, you who Partake?
Goon Squad 5
Goon Squad 6
Noahide News Part 342
Noahide News Part 343
Noahide News Part 344
Noahide News Part 345
Noahide News Part 346
Noahide News Part 347
Noahide News Part 348
Noahide News Part 349
Noahide News Part 350
Noahide News Part 351
No to Noahide
Noahide News Part 352
Noahide News Part 353
Noahide News Part 354
Noahide News Part 355
Noahide News Part 356
Noahide News Part 357
Noahide News Part 358
Noahide News Part 359
Noahide News Part 360
Noahide News Part 361
Noahide News Part 362
Noahide News Part 363
Noahide News Part 364
Noahide News Part 365
Noahide News Part 366
Noahide News Part 367
Noahide News Part 368
Noahide News Part 369
Noahide News Part 370
Noahide News Part 371
Noahide News Part 372
Noahide News Part 373
Noahide News Part 374
Noahide News Part 375
Noahide News Part 376
Noahide News Part 377
Noahide News Part 378
Noahide News Part 379
Noahide News Part 380
Noahide News Part 381
Noahide News Part 382
Noahide News Part 383
Noahide News Part 384
Noahide News Part 385
Noahide News Part 386
Noahide News Part 387
Noahide News Part 388
Noahide News Part 389
Noahide News Part 390
Noahide News Part 391
Noahide News Part 392
Noahide News Part 393
Noahide News Part 394