House Seeks Boost to Spy Powers
By KATHERINE SHRADER
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration asked Congress Friday to allow
monitoring of more foreigners in the United States during intelligence
The plan is one of several proposed changes, which have been in the works
for more than a year, that go to the heart of a key U.S. surveillance law.
The administration says the changes are intended to help the government
better address national security threats by updating the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act to bring it into line with rapid changes in communications
Civil liberties groups see the government's effort as a needless power
The proposal would revise the way the government gets warrants from the
secretive FISA court to investigate suspected terrorists, spies and other
national security threats.
The administration wants to be able to monitor foreign nationals on
American soil if they are thought to have significant intelligence
information, but no known links to a foreign power. Under current law, the
government must convince a FISA judge that an individual is an agent of a
government, terror group
or some other foreign adversary.
The administration also wants new provisions to ease surveillance of people
suspected of spreading weapons of mass destruction internationally.
And the administration wants to allow government lawyers to decide whether
a FISA court order is needed for electronic eavesdropping based on the target
of the monitoring, not the mode of communication or the location where the
surveillance is being conducted.
One effect of such a change: the National Security Agency would have the
authority to monitor foreigners without seeking court approval, even if the
surveillance is conducted by tapping phones and e-mail accounts in the United
Most often used by the FBI and the NSA, the 1978 FISA law has been updated
several times since it was first passed, including in 2001 to allow government
access to certain business records.
Among other tools available now, the
government can break into homes, hotel rooms and cars to install hidden cameras
and listening devices, as well as search drawers, luggage or hard drives.
President Bush has been under fire for his program allowing the NSA to
monitor international calls and e-mails coming into the United States, when one
party in the communication had suspected links to international terrorism.
Earlier this year, Bush asked a federal court to oversee the operations, known
as the terrorist surveillance program.
The Rothschild Carrier
spy scheme, when they know every Transaction of profit
"This legislation is important to ensure that FISA continues to serve
the nation as a means to protect our country from foreign security threats,
while also continuing to protect the valued privacy interests and civil
liberties of persons located in the United States," the Justice Department
said in a fact sheet released Friday.
But civil liberties advocates at the American Civil Liberties Union and
elsewhere see the changes as a sweeping overhaul that would undermine
long-standing protections. Lisa Graves of the Center for National Security
Studies said the changes are "poorly conceived" and "not
justified," given a lack of oversight on the government's current powers.
shem sham of empty eloquence
The Associated Press reported many of the bill's details earlier this week.
Among other changes, the legislation would:
_Clarify the standards the FBI and NSA must use to get court orders for basic
information about calls and e-mails - such as the number dialed, e-mail address,
or time and date of the communications. Civil liberties advocates contend the
change will make it too easy for the government to access this information.
while they hide the e-mails of Treason at
the whorehouse Washington DC
_Triple the life span of a FISA warrant for a non-U.S. citizen from 120 days
to one year, allowing the government to monitor much longer without checking
back in with a judge. The Justice Department says this would allow the
government to focus its resources on cases involving U.S. citizens because it
wouldn't have to get as many time-consuming renewals on warrants for cases
_Give telecommunications companies immunity from civil liability for their
cooperation with any intelligence communications program, such as Bush's
terrorist surveillance program. Pending lawsuits against companies including
Verizon and AT&T allege they violated privacy laws by giving phone records
to the NSA for the program.
Find these companies and boycott them
_Extend from 72 hours to one week the amount of time the government can
conduct surveillance without a court order in emergencies.
Give the Bushkeviks power to MURDER wonderfully
The Present Situation
By Dick Eastman
Your cow has a heffer, you give a man a white pebble and tell
him that is good for the heffer whenever he wants to claim it, the man gives it
to another man in exchange for something and that other man brings the white
stone to you and gets the heffer for it.
That is money.
Someone builds a safe and says he will keep white stones
That is a bank.
A banker says he will loan some white stones to a
rancher who want to cook cows to feed cowboys herding cattle provided that
rancher pays three stones for every one hundred stones borrowed.
That is usury.
The banker starts adding his own white stones that he
finds around his garden to the stones in the vault that people have
given him for safe keeping and lends these new stones out with usury.
With more stones in circulation more stones are required to
buy things, but a single stone now buys less than a heffer -- and a lot of
people who thought they had purchasing power safe in the bank at one stone
for one heffer find out that they have been robbed but don't know who
to blame. So people work harder and a lot longer to get the stones they
need to buy just as much or fewer heffers than before. Now, since the
banker know knows there aren't heffers enough to repay all the loans
he has made, the banker insists on collateral for every loan -- so people, in
order to eat and pay their interest mortgage their ranches or whatever else they
have that's worth anything.
So now the people owe the banker more stones than there
are heffers and everyone owes that banker more than there is ability to pay. The
banker forecloses on mortgages. He quietly comes to own everything.
The banker now realizes where his real wealth lies. First
he floods the town with white pebbles and lendiong them out cheap to people
fixing up their ranches or building new businesses in town. Then he cuts the
amount of stones he lends out, so that as loans are repayed there are fewer and
fewer stones in circulation -- people can't make their debt payments and eat too
-- the ranches and new businesses in town all go to the banker.
People are given white stones because they sold their
labor, or bacause the exchanged something they own for it, or
because they are credit worthy. People are credit worthy because either they
have collateral to put up or else the lender has confidence in their ability to
profit and repay the loan.
Soon the banker owns a lot of businesses but finds it
difficult to run them. He consolidates the businesses he he now owns by
bankrolling large monopoly concerns owned impersonally by share holders (i.e.
the banker and his trusted agents) where there is no liability against the
owner for what the new monopoly firm does (aside from what
happens to the value of the shares.)
These are corporations.
With monopoly power the corporations can set prices for
output far above costs of production of that output -- prices at
whatever the market will bare -- and if the monopoly is strong enough that means
they can take all of the purchasing power the people have earned in
production. The corporation pays wages and salaries, but it also pays the
banker for its loans for plant and equipment and raw materials. The goods the
corportation produces is a flow of goods all priced at a
miniumum to cover all costs -- that is to cover the costs in wages and
salaries plus payments to the bank whose loans set up the corporation and keep
But here lies a major new problem.
The wages and salaries (white pebbles) paid so that people
working for the corporations can eat and stay clothed and sleep under a
roof are not enough to pay for the products of the corporation, because, as I
just said, the prices of the goods are set to cover both costs in wages and
salaries but also payments to banks -- the people working for the corporation
can't buy all that they produce even though they need it and would buy it if
they could. For the people working for the corporations lack the credit to buy
what is produced, lack the credit to buy what they need for their families to
live and live comfortably.
Oh, yes. There is also a goverment. The
goverment started as a mechanism to keep people honest, but soon it became
just another corporation, except instead of paying your white pebbles to get
something in return, you turn over your white pebbles at gunpoint or at the
threat of having it taken at gunpoint to the government (more of the banker's
agents). The money is used to buy government products -- police and armies, for
example. The police are to keep you from disturbing the banker.
The armies have a purpose too.
Since the wages and salaries are not enough to buy the
product made in the corporations, the corporations always end up with an
unsold surplus which they seek to sell abroad. The idea is that
people in other countries will buy the unsold output of the corporations, since
people at home lacked the purchasing power to do this. (Thus the people produce
output which they end up buying, which they can't buy enough of, and the surplus
product that the banker's agents running the corporations sell abroad keeping
the purchasing power they gain for additional overseas investments.
Now the people who now have to make products for export as
well as for themselves are no the only people being put upon. The
people of those other countries where the exports are going have
their own ranches selling heffers and their own businesses in their own towns
making things for their own people. And so the corporations from the banker's
country must one way or another take over the governments of those other
countries -- with bribes, with revolutions that they pay for -- so that those
governments will take loans from the banker (who is now an international
banker) and buy the products of the corporations owned by the banker and his
agents. This does not always go smoothly and sometimes war is needed to make it
But soon it is discovered that war itself is just as
good as foreign trade. (Just as a goverment is really a corporation.) The
corporation goverment, borrowing from the banker, immediately drafts soldiers or
else gathers up the unemployed who are standing around wondering how they
will pay their debts or feed and clothe themselves) and "exports them"
along with a lot of tools of destruction to provide the unasked-for service to
some other country -- killing its people and destroying its factories. Exporting
destruction is really a lot simpler and a lot more of a "sure thing"
than trying to figure out what the average housewife of a foreign country wants
for her kitchen. And of course the defeated country must pay in plunder and
there is now also a new "demand" for exports from the corporations --
for "reconstruction" of the destroyed country under the control of
agents that the successful war has set up running the new government during the
Back home, the workers for the corporations are producing
tools of destruction as well as food and supplies all price-costed above what
they can afford to buy for themselves -- so that their consumption is limited
far below what their productive capactiy by itself allows -- the people
are in debt because the amount of white pebbles is being manipulated to put them
in debt and because the things they need to buy are priced "wages plus
usury" whereas their income is only "wages."
And somewhere along the way the banker discovers
The banker now realizes that some of the other countries he
now controls were poorer than the country he got started in and that with the
new dictatorships he has set up in those countries -- the new
"corporation with the guns" -- he can send the corporations of
the country he started with to countries where life is cheap and workers will
show up and work for payment of one tenth of what people of his own country can
be employeed for -- the people in the banker's own country
having to be paid in more pebbles in order to have enough to tax away
in order to buy the guns that gain control of the other
countries and enough to pay the interest on the loans that goverment
took out to pay for those guns and uniforms and all that destruction. And so
factories stop being built in the banker's own country and factories
are shut down there and all the new factories are now built in the foreign
country that has the corporation (government) with the guns that has set
things up so workers need be paid the least possible.
Now the monopoly corporations owned by the bankers and his
agents can produce products for one fifth or less labor cost than what it cost
in their own country. This does not however translate into low prices for
the people in the banker's own country. The corporations are,
after all, monopoly corporations -- the same banker owns all the corporations,
his agents are each on several boards of different ones -- and so the
"savings" in labor costs need not be passed on in lower prices to the
people (now no longer producing anything) of the banker's old country -- except
temporarily, to drive out of business any firms not owned by the banker, but
after these non-globalizedfirms are gone the prices go right back up again.
(Just like prices of gasoline go down before an election and right back up again
a few months after the election.)
Of course the wages and salaries after taxes -- are smaller
than ever for the former corporation workers now that globalization has set in.
The richest people in the original country of the banker are now the
govemrent employees, the lawyers defending the corporations and bank, those
involved with wars and "free trade" -- the rest of the people take in
each others laundries, build new banks and giant outlets for foreign-made goods
-- end set up in the empty buildings where locally-owned businesses used to be
nail polishing boutiques, coffee stands, tatoo parlors and so on. The banker and
his agents running the corporations no longer view themselves as tied to the
banker's original country. They just view countries as land administred by the
gun-weilding corporations they have set up. Some goverments of countries are for
cheap-labor production for international distribution, others are for
exporting war. The banker may actually blow up his old building in his old
country and blame it on "anti-bankers" and move to a new country or to
several countries that are not so run down and shabby.
Now to fix this problem we have to see that obviously the
productive abilities of the people should not have been captured by the banker
with his monopoly of credit and his agents, the corporations -- who even own the
lyrics and monopoly rights to old movies that the people made long ago, and
the publishing rights to books, and most important the patent control rights to
everything anyone has invented to make better goods -- and,
of course, and who controls what everyone hears on radio and television and
owns the biggest sites and companies on the internet as well as an army of
shills constantly selling people on the rightness of all that the
banker does and the glorious patriotic system the banker has set up and
blesses everything the banker's agents running the goverment are
doing or trying to do.
When people are enslaved in debt and when production and the
means of production have been taken from them it is time to consider this
questions. Why does the banker get to loan out those extra stones he has added
himself and why is he allowed to call in his loans and shrink the amount of
stones in circulation? Why does he get to make the rule "because you have
no collateral left you can't get credit for pebbles" -- who put him in that
powerful position which is above govenments and above responsibility for what
happens to everyone when he does that?
Stop and think.
Labor is only responsible for a tiny fraction of what is made
these days. That for that tiny share is all that most people are paid on.
What really makes products these days is machines and the
advanced technologies incorporated in those machines, all labor-saving
means of production that have been invented and discovered by many people
over many years. This is the real wealth, the real credit of a country, --
not white pebbles or bamk credit. Yet the banker and his agents have
sold us on the story that we are only supposed to get paid for
"work." Whereas the banker and his agents (owning corporation stock
and owning the IOUs representing all of the debt of the people) live on the
interest and on the monopoly profit and on the gains from having a monopoly on
the power to increase or decrease the amount of white pebbles in circulation and
on their ability to have their agents running the government corproation make
big contracts with corporations that are backed by the ability of the goverment
to get pebbles from the people at gunpoint. The problem for the
people then is that the real credit (the wealth of knowledge and technology for
machines and organization within a market system that saves all that labor
needed to produce) has not been acredited to the people of the country.
Instead there is a monopoly n extending credit that owned by the banker and
his agents -- that has enabled him to own large corporations that in turn
own all the patents and to own the agents controlling govenment so that taxes
and goverment borrowing as well as police and war power are also under his
What is needed is a hero to ride into town who can stare
down the banker and his agents and their hired guns and tell him that the con
is over. That from now on everyone in this country is getting a base amount of
white pebbles to provide a good life so that they do not have to
beg for jobs from corporations, so that they can have the means to start
businesses for themselves, businesses where the people will have the purchasing
power to buy what they produce -- simply as credit due them for their
share in the ownership of the vast wealth of the inventions and organization and
machines that people have built. No longer are we going to believe the lie that
the cost of producing our goods and services is anyting other than the food and
clothing and other consumption goods required by the people in order to produce
what they produce in the market system. Cowboys eat meat while they round up
more cows. And so does the blacksmith who shoes his horse and makes his saddle
and the one who replaces the worn out shears for cutting the leather for that
saddle. The banker making pebbles scarce and controlling the interest rate
on pebbles and lending it at blue chip rates to corporations and not at all to
the small businessman has no right to be monopolizing purchasing
power. The loans at interest and repayment that goes into prices and
makes people come up short when they go to the store to buy the things
they need -- is not a flaw of the production system -- it is not
a flaw of the market system -- it is a flaw of the credit system, of the
financial system. Credit needs to be distributed to the people who have a right
to it -- they have a right to it as a dividend check on the wealth of
society that they in part own -- that is the technology and knowhow that
people have provided.
Of course the banker will say that he bought patents on all
those inventions from the starving inventors who could not get money to develop
their own ideas unless they sold the patent to the banker and his agents. He
would say that since he and his agents have a monopoly on loan making and set
the policy for all loan making so that people can't own small-businesses any
more and workers cannot own their own tools etc. that the wealth of the world's
know-how for labor saving machines is his and his agents' rightful monopoly. The
inventor of the light bulb could not get loans. The banker knew he had
the ability to make profit -- but they wanted to buy and control his real
wealth of invention -- and so it is with every inventor, whether working for a
corporation or working on his own. In this way the wealth added to us all by the
great men is kept from our use. And no -- this system of monopolization of
credit does not motivate the inventor to invent -- nor the
composer to compose.
And it is here the hero in his standoff with the banker and
his gang tells them they are wrong, digs his spurs into the dust, adjusts
his bandana and straightens his hat and turns his head over his
shoulder and says to the town, which has gathered behind, "Whose
At this point one of the banker's agents will slip off to the
telegraph office and wire to the agents running the foreign countries informing
them that the banker and his agents are under attack and arrange that
the foreign agents send an invading army at once to the banker's country
to put down a rebellion of "banker-haters." Another agent -- the one
heading the government corporation -- runs off and declares war in three or four
different countries and so sends off all the fighting-age men off to
foreign wars so they won't be able to cause any trouble at home when the
foreign forces come to rescue the banker. Of course there are already
a large number of young fighting-age people in prisons, mostly for being
involved in bottom-level selling of drugs -- another little piece of action that
the banker and his agents have going on.
But the hero, seeing all this, sends off some of his boys to
the internet and they inform people around the world -- especially in those
countries where the banker and his agents have made a lot of war and have
destroyed a lot of the native economy and way of life -- that this is the time
to stand up to the banker and his agents on a world-wide basis. It's
time to face down every goverment controlled by the banker, it's time to get the truth
of the real situation across to every intelligent person -- so they can
rise up as one and throw off this system of monopoly credit -- and set up a new
credit system -- decentralized and with social credit added so that people can
buy what they themselves produce with the wealth of know-how that has made
production depend so little upon labor.
High noon moves around the earth every 24 hours. You are
the hero. If you understand what is explained here, pass it on -- especially if
you can do so in another language. To expand it and make it rigorous for the
intellectual. To simplify it it in your own words. Tell it in a way that people
of other lands and other cultures can understand.
And you had better act fast, because the bankers agents have
already put in that call to bring down the "anti-banker" hero and all
who back him. We are fast approaching a time when "heroes" will
Homework for heroes:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chdouglas/ (for more
against the credit monopoly -- start with oldest articles)
Anti Christ Filthy World Odor
Canadian high court turns Zundel away
The Canadian Supreme Court
rejected a Holocaust denier's final appeal against his detention.
Ernst Zundel was detained by
Canadian authorities from 2003, when he was deported to Canada from the United
States for overstaying his tourist visa, until 2005, when Canada deported him to
his native Germany, where he is now serving a five-year sentence for Holocaust
Zundel had claimed the detention
and deportation in Canada were illegal because of his earlier 40-year residency
on Canada, although he has never obtained Canadian citizenship.
On Wednesday, Canada's highest
court turned down his appeal.
Brith Canada is pleased to learn that the Supreme Court of Canada has in its
wisdom chosen to dismiss Zundel's last attempt to use the legal system in Canada
as a platform for his brand of hate," said Frank Dimant, executive vice
president of B'nai B'rith Canada.
Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg
is more determined. He knows that in the near future the Land of Israel is about
to expand. He writes, "It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the
seven Noahide laws, and if not—they
will be killed." (Ma'ariv, 10/6/04)
Keel em all, in ah ha the name ah ha Judeo-Jaysooooooooooose,
so hep of gawd of Talmud Bavli, cry the hageeite Proselyes made two fold the
children of Hell, anti-Christ Noahides, Do ah heah an "ALLMAN"
CUFI "wipes" mosques
Christians United For Israel, a
pro-Israel evangelical group, features on its website a photo of Jerusalem with
the city's holiest mosques wiped out.
The photo-shopped view of the
Western Wall and the Temple Mount is featured in a huge banner across every page
paid mammonite shill will seek to slay the TRUE Christ believers and think to do
God a service
Radical Islamists rally
anti-Israel sentiment by claiming that Israel hopes to remove the mount's two
mosques, including al-Aqsa, where the prophet Mohammed is believed to have
ascended to heaven; Israel strongly rejects the charges, noting its efforts over
the years to protect the area.
CUFI, headed by Texas preacher,(No
Preacher of the Living God, he serves the murderer from the beginning and the
lust of his father he is about) Pastor John Hagee, has made
inroads into Jewish reluctance to deal with evangelicals. Hagee spoke last month
at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's policy conference. CUFI and
AIPAC spokesmen did not return requests for comment.
Washington Times reviews anti-Israel ad
The Washington Times newspaper
will review how it published an ad calling Israel
"an official anti-Christianity nation."
the conservative daily's vice president and general manager, told the Washington
Jewish Week that the March 28 ad "gets real close to the line" of
violating the paper's ad policy of not allowing false ads or ads denigrating
The Exhorters, a group based in
Vienna, Va. placed the ad and similar ones appearing on March 8 and in December.
The Anti-Defamation League says Sam Rittenhouse, a Holocaust
denier and anti-Semitic propagandist, founded the group.
The Washington Times apologized
to area Jews in 2005 after publishing an ad by Rittenhouse that declared:
"Israel and her Zionists are not a friend to Christianity, Christians or
didnt say "no" to noahide,
HE WAS THE AUTHOR OF IT
Pickles "right hand", his god is THE BEAST.
Its the SON OF MAN, JESUS
"THE KIKE" who has kicked God the father
of the throne and sits on it yonder in heaven........THE ABOMINATION THAT MAKETH
DESOLATE!) Jason Guenther www.thelowestroom.com
in case you want to Pray
with this vermin, and ask him if he will repent of the filth and his seven
demons with him.
do not forget the head of
Yakkity Yak....Don't Talk back
Repent in the Name of Jesus
News Part 712
1: Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
(Noahide) righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
2: For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
3: For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own