Noahide News

Part 82

Dec. 6, 2004

Day 17 of 1290 of 2300


of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.


mason seal

Extra Extra

Pretzle or Bagel


Stunning Jewish Success
Dominates American Media

Compiled by Jeffrey Blankfort
MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report and chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.
LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers, appointed by Clinton.
JONATHAN MILLER, chair and CEO of AOL division of AOL-Time-Warner
NEIL SHAPIRO, president of NBC News
JEFF GASPIN, Executive Vice-President, Programming, NBC
DAVID WESTIN, president of ABC News
SUMNER REDSTONE, CEO of Viacom, "world's biggest media giant" (Economist, 11/23/2) owns Viacom cable, CBS and MTVs all over the world, Blockbuster video rentals and Black Entertainment TV.
MICHAEL EISNER, major owner of Walt Disney, Capitol Cities, ABC.
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times, News of the World (Jewish mother)
MEL KARMAZIN, president of CBS
DON HEWITT, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes, CBS
JEFF FAGER, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes II. CBS
DAVID POLTRACK, Executive Vice-President, Research and Planning, CBS
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
LLOYD BRAUN, Chair, ABC Entertainment
BARRY MEYER, chair, Warner Bros.
SHERRY LANSING. President of Paramount Communications and Chairman of Paramount Pictures' Motion Picture Group.
BRAD SIEGEL., President, Turner Entertainment.
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp., owner of Fox TV
MARTY PERETZ, owner and publisher of the New Republic, which openly identifies itself as pro-Israel. Al Gore credits Marty with being his "mentor."
ARTHUR O. SULZBERGER, JR., publisher of the NY Times, the Boston Globe and other publications.
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
TOM FRIEDMAN, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post. Honored by Honest, website monitoring "anti-Israel media."
RICHARD COHEN, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post
JEFF JACOBY, syndicated columnist for the Boston Globe
NORMAN ORNSTEIN, American Enterprise Inst., regular columnist for USA Today, news analyst for CBS, and co-chair with Leslie Moonves of the Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers, appointed by Clinton.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an expert on domestic terrorism.
DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN, owner of the Village Voice and the New Times network of "alternative weeklies."
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund
KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker
BARRY DILLER, chair of USA Interactive, former owner of Universal Entertainment
KENNETH ROTH, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer and Bill O'Reilly.
TERRY SEMEL, CEO, Yahoo, former chair, Warner Bros.
MARK GOLIN, VP and Creative Director, AOL
WARREN LIEBERFORD, Pres., Warner Bros. Home Video Div. of AOL- TimeWarner
JEFFREY ZUCKER, President of NBC Entertainment
JACK MYERS, NBC, chief.NYT 5.14.2
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
STEPHEN SPIELBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
JEFFREY KATZENBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
DAVID GEFFEN, co-owner of Dreamworks
LLYOD BRAUN, chair of ABC Entertainment
JORDAN LEVIN, president of Warner Bros. Entertainment
MAX MUTCHNICK, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
DAVID KOHAN, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
HOWARD STRINGER, chief of Sony Corp. of America
AMY PASCAL, chair of Columbia Pictures
JOEL KLEIN, chair and CEO of Bertelsmann's American operations
ROBERT SILLERMAN, founder of Clear Channel Communications
BRIAN GRADEN, president of MTV entertainment
IVAN SEIDENBERG, CEO of Verizon Communications
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
LARRY KING, host of Larry King Live
TED KOPPEL, host of ABC's Nightline
MIKE WALLACE, Host of CBS, 60 Minutes
MICHAEL LEDEEN, editor of National Review
BRUCE NUSSBAUM, editorial page editor, Business Week
DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son of
CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post
HOWARD FINEMAN, Chief Political Columnist, Newsweek
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director
Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
RON ROSENTHAL, Managing Editor, San Francisco Chronicle
PHIL BRONSTEIN, Executive Editor, San Francisco Chronicle,
RON OWENS, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
JOHN ROTHMAN, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
MICHAEL SAVAGE, Talk Show Host, KFSO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco) Syndicated in 100 markets
MICHAEL MEDVED, Talk Show Host, on 124 AM stations
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA. Has Israeli flag on his home page.
BEN WATTENBERG, Moderator, PBS Think Tank.
ANDREW LACK, president of NBC
DANIEL MENAKER, Executive Director, Harper Collins
DAVID REZNIK, Editor, The New Yorker
NICHOLAS LEHMANN, writer, the New York
HENRICK HERTZBERG, Talk of the Town editor, The New Yorker
SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR, and DONALD NEWHOUSE own Newhouse Publications, includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities; the Conde Nast magazine group, includes The New Yorker; Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplement; American City Business Journals, business newspapers published in more than 30 major cities in America; and interests in cable television programming and cable systems serving 1 million homes.
DONALD NEWHOUSE, chairman of the board of directors, Associated Press.
PETER R KANN, CEO, Wall Street Journal, Barron's
RALPH J. & BRIAN ROBERTS, Owners, Comcast-ATT Cable TV.



In ah ha theyah ha name ah ha Jaysooose keeeel all em dirty Arabs they cry!

Christian Killers?

by Laurence M. Vance
by Laurence M. Vance

There is no doubt that many of the soldiers responsible for the recent death and destruction in Fallujah are Christians. And there is no doubt that many Americans who call for more death and destruction in Iraq and elsewhere are Christians as well.

Christian Killers.

wrong...Judaeo-Churchinsanity killers for their "Chosen" who Chose the "Robber" and crucified the Chooser

The phrase should be a contradiction in terms. If someone referred to Christian adulterers, Christian drug addicts, Christian prostitutes, Christian pimps, Christian gangsta rappers, or Christian acid rockers, most Christians would get an extremely perplexed look on their face. But when Christians in the military continue killing for the state, and Christians not in the military call for more killing in the name of the state, many Christians don’t even raise an eyebrow.

In some respects, this is the fault of religious "leaders." Christians in the pew are in many cases just blindly following their pastors, priests, elders, and ministers who, instead of preaching the gospel, are preaching the same pro-war politics their congregation hears on the Sean Hannity radio show or else they are not denouncing the debacle in Iraq for what it is: unscriptural, immoral, and unconstitutional. Conservative religious leaders are in some cases nothing more than cheerleaders for George Bush and the Republican Party.


But even if a Christian hears nothing but pro-war propaganda from the pulpit, it is still no excuse, for Christians have access to the truth if they will just put forth the effort to look for it. They have a Bible they can read for themselves. They have the example of some principled Christian leaders who have opposed the debacle in Iraq from the beginning. They have an abundance of alternative news sources to receive information from besides the pro-war propaganda they get from the Fox War Channel and the War Street Journal. It is unfortunate that some Christians won’t read anything unless it was written by some other Christian they know and usually agree with. God forbid that they should read something by someone outside of their denomination, circle, or "camp" – or even worse, someone they consider to be a nominal Christian or not a Christian at all.

To justify their consent or silence, and to keep their congregations in line, Christian leaders repeat to their parishioners the mantra of "obey the powers that be," a loose paraphrase of Romans 13:1, as if that somehow means that they should blindly follow whatever the president or the government says, and even worse, that it overturns the commandment "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13; Deuteronomy 5:17), which is repeated in the New Testament (Matthew 19:18; Romans 13:9). The way some Christians repeat the "obey the powers that be" mantra, one would think that they would slit their own mothers’ throats if the state told them to do so.

you had better betcha they will, and they soon will deliver the True saints of Jesus to their freemason councils and the shema-God thinking to do their God a service.....

Under what circumstances, then, is a Christian justified in or excused from killing another human being? Is it ever all right for a Christian to be a "killer"? As I see it, there are four circumstances under which a Christian could justifiably kill or be excused from killing: capital punishment, self-defense, accidents, and "just" wars.

True Christ believer slay no man for any reason, for we are of Life eternal. Only they of the murderer since the beginning murders man since the beginning. There is no such thing as a Just war.

A Christian who lawfully carried out capital punishment would not be committing murder. Although the subject of capital punishment is sometimes hotly debated, the Bible sanctions it before the law (Genesis 9:6), under the law (Numbers 35:16–21, 30–31), and under the New Testament (Acts 25:11; Romans 13:4). For more on the death penalty see Walter Block.

No one, Christian or otherwise, would fault a man for killing another man in self-defense. Only the most diehard pacifist would refuse to act in self-defense if he was attacked. This would have to include the protection of one’s family as well, for if the Bible condemns a Christian for not providing for his own house (1 Timothy 5:8), how could a Christian not ensure by whatever means necessary the protection of his family’s life?

What an oxy-Moron, if a man was convicted and was captured and was attacked then he has no right to Protect himself? And all the courts are now talmudic Shem courts of freemason No-Hides


Accidents happen. And sometimes someone is tragically killed. This does not make the perpetrator a murderer. The Jews were commanded in the Old Testament to establish cities of refuge (Numbers 35:6, 11-15) to which someone might flee that killed his neighbor unawares or ignorantly (Numbers 35:11; Deuteronomy 19:4-5).

Most Christians would wholeheartedly agree with these first three propositions. The problem is with war; specifically, the fact that all wars are not created equal. The vast majority of wars in the world’s history have been destructive, unjust, and immoral. What constitutes a just war is a question I have answered in the essay "Christianity and War." Obviously, an aggressive, preemptive war against a country with no navy or air force, an economy in ruins after a decade of sanctions, and that was no threat to the United States is not a just war.

A Christian fighting for the U.S. Government in Iraq doesn’t fall under any of these circumstances.

After Bush launched his nebulous "war on terrorism" by having Afghanistan bombed back to the Stone Age to supposedly rid the world of Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, and the Taliban, he announced to the world his "axis of evil" and went to war against Iraq to, depending on what day it was, rid the world of the evil Saddam Hussein or because Iraq violated U.N. resolutions or to destroy Iraq’s supposed stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction or because of the perceived connection between al-Qaeda and Iraq or to liberate the Iraqi people or to bring democracy to Iraq.

Christians who support or remain silent about Bush’s "war against terrorism" are terribly inconsistent. If the state were to say: "Here Christian, put on this uniform, take this gun, go to your hometown, and kill your father," Christians would recoil in horror and refuse to obey the state. But if the state were to say: "Here Christian, put on this uniform, take this gun, go to Iraq, and kill someone else’s father," I am afraid that many Christians would reply, "When does my plane leave?"

Why is it that the same Christian who would not do the former, has no qualms about doing the latter?

Because they are not Christians, and are become obedient Goyim Noahides for their Judaeo-shemgods and their proselyete pastors

Christians who voted for George W. Bush (even if it is true that he was in fact the lesser of two evils – a dubious proposition), or make excuses for his invasion of Iraq, are supporting a man with blood on his hands (Iraqi blood and American blood). The fact that the president himself never killed anyone is irrelevant – Adolf Hitler never gassed a single Jew.

What, then, is a Christian to do? What should any citizen do? Even though it is no longer posted in the public schools, most people know the answer: "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13). Stop killing or supporting or making excuses for those who do. Quit ignoring the fact that the United States has a global empire of troops and bases that inevitably leads to more killing. Realize that it is the interventionist foreign policy of the United States that is the main reason why the world hates us. Acknowledge that the reason more countries don’t hate us is because we bribe them with foreign aid (after the money is first confiscated from U.S. taxpayers).

It is true that the Bible commands the Christian: "Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake" (1 Peter 2:13). And it is true that it also says: "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers" (Romans 13:1). But it doesn’t take a seminary education to see that this doesn’t trump the commandment: "Thou shalt not kill." To know when to submit and when to be in subjection, we have some relevant biblical examples to go by – two in the Old Testament book of Daniel and two in the New Testament book of Acts.

In Daniel chapter 3, we read that King Nebuchadnezzar "made an image of gold, whose height was threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof six cubits: he set it up in the plain of Dura, in the province of Babylon" (Daniel 3:1). It was then decreed that when the music started, everyone was to "fall down and worship the golden image that Nebuchadnezzar the king hath set up" (Daniel 3:5). The penalty for noncompliance was to be "cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace" (Daniel 3:6). It was then charged that Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego would not worship the golden image (Daniel 3:12). When brought before the king and threatened with being cast into the furnace, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego answered the king: "If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O king. But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up" (Daniel 3:17-18). Although Nebuchadnezzar did cast them into the furnace, and God did deliver them, the point is that these three Hebrews did not submit and were not subject to King Nebuchadnezzar.

In Daniel chapter 6, we read that King Darius made a decree that "whosoever shall ask a petition of any God or man for thirty days," except from the king, "shall be cast into the den of lions" (Daniel 6:7). But "when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house; and his windows being open in his chamber toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime" (Daniel 6:10). For his disobedience, Daniel was cast into the den of lions, but God delivered him. The point, however, is that Daniel did not submit and was not subject to King Darius.

In Acts chapter 4, the Apostles Peter and John were imprisoned by the leaders of the Jews and then brought before them and commanded "not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus" (Acts 4:18). But instead of submitting and being in subjection, they replied: "Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard" (Acts 4:19-20). They even prayed for boldness to continue speaking (Acts 4:29).

In Acts chapter 5, some apostles were put in prison by order of the high priest (Acts 5:17-18). They were freed by an angel and ordered to "stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life" (Acts 5:20). These apostles were then brought before the leaders of the Jews and asked: "Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? And, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man’s blood upon us" (Acts 5:28). But rather than apologizing and submitting and being subject to them, the apostles replied: "We ought to obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29).

To say, as some Christians do, that because "The LORD is a man of war" (Exodus 15:3), and God allows wars between nations, that it is honorable for Christians to enthusiastically participate in U.S. wars of aggression is about the most profound demonstration of biblical ignorance that one could manifest.

Perhaps I should close by saying that I have never advocated, nor am I now advocating, nor do I intend to advocate in the future, any armed resistance to the government or any aggression against the government in any way. The pen is mightier than the sword. "The weapons of our warfare are not carnal" (2 Corinthians 10:4). However, as Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

And, as even Abraham Lincoln said (long before his invasion of the Southern states):

Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.

What is a Christian (or anyone) going to do when he faces God at the Judgment and has to give an account of his actions? Suppose he is asked a simple question: "Why did you kill those people defending their homes in Iraq?" And suppose he replied: "Because the U.S. government told me to." What do you suppose would be the Lord’s reaction to such a reply? But what else could a man say? He could not say that the United States was under attack. He could not say that Iraq was a threat to the United States. He could not say that he was protecting his family. He could not say that he was protecting his property. He could not even legitimately say that he was protecting himself, since he was in fact a trespasser on someone else’s property intending to do the owner great bodily harm.

"Cursed be he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person. And all the people shall say, Amen" (Deuteronomy 27:25).

December 2, 2004

Laurence M. Vance [send him mail] is a freelance writer and an adjunct instructor in accounting and economics at Pensacola Junior College in Pensacola, FL. His forthcoming book is Christianity and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State. Visit his website.

Copyright © 2004


High Treason from the Talmudic Unconstitutional High Court

O'Connor praises
international law

Calls foreign code 'vital' if judges
are to faithfully discharge duties

This Viperous Jewess, is glorifying their Talmudic Noahide Laws. A Blasphemous Treasonous dog who sits on the Bench.

Posted: October 27, 2004
9:10 p.m. Eastern

© 2004

WASHINGTON – Judges would be negligent if they disregarded the growing role of international law in U.S. courts, asserted Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in a speech today at Georgetown Law School.

Treason to the Constitution for the United States

It was the second time O'Connor has made a point of affirming the place of international law in U.S. courts

O'Connor said the Supreme Court is taking more cases that demand a better understanding of foreign legal systems and procedures. She cited, as a recent example, terror cases involving the U.S. detention of foreign-born detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Noahide war against opposition of their Hoodlum haha

"International law is no longer a specialty," said the appointee of President Reagan.

Who was the First serpent to adhere to Schneersons rib-eyes laws of Talmud Bavli

 "It is vital if judges are to faithfully discharge their duties. Since Sept. 11, 2001, we're reminded some nations don't have the rule of law or (know) that it's the key to liberty."

WTC the Talmudic wannabe World to Come

Later this term, the Supreme Court is scheduled to decide the constitutionality of executing juvenile killers – a case that has attracted wide interest overseas, with many foreign nations filing briefs pointing to international human rights norms as a justification for banning the practice. O'Connor did not specifically mention the case.

Preparing to slay the Children

She said recognizing international law could foster more civilized societies in the United States and abroad.

Seventy Goyim Obedient Noahide Nations....No Hide

"International law is a help in our search for a more peaceful world," said O'Connor.

Death wonderfully by Peace

At least five members of the current U.S. Supreme Court align themselves with O'Connor's position that international law has a role in U.S. courts.

at least five are serpents dung of Talmud Bavli treason and blasphemy

In 2003, Ruth Bader Ginsburg  (jew) told the American Constitution Society her colleagues are looking beyond America's borders for guidance in handling cases on issues like the death penalty and homosexual rights.

Looking to the Sanhedrin

In a decision earlier that year in a Texas case in which anti-sodomy laws were overruled, the justices first referred to the findings of foreign courts. The year before, the court said executing mentally retarded people is unconstitutionally cruel, noting the practice was opposed internationally. Ginsburg cited an international treaty in her vote in 2003 to uphold the use of race in college admissions.

She said, "Our island or lone-ranger mentality is beginning to change." Justices, she added, "are becoming more open to comparative and international law perspectives."

Communitarian Sofiet Talmudic Noahide Collective

Ginsburg, O'Connor and Stephen Breyer discussed the death penalty and terrorism with French President Jacques Chirac during a European tour that included a conference on the European constitution that same year. France outlawed the death penalty in 1981. Five members of the court attended the conference.

setting up global decapitation

"While you are the American Constitution Society, your perspective on constitutional law should encompass the world," she told the group of judges, lawyers and students. "We are the losers if we do not both share our experiences with and learn from others."

Liar of her father the murderer since the beginning

Ginsburg also tipped that the Internet is making it easier for the justices to keep up with the decisions of foreign courts.


Earlier, a New York Times story explained that extensive foreign travel has made both Anthony Kennedy and O'Connor "more alert" to how their peers on other constitutional courts see similar issues.

Amaraka you will deserve your destruction and enslavement for you are complacent and treasonous apostate proselytes of the shemgods

"Justices have always traveled, teaching or taking part in seminars," the story said. "But these are trips with a difference."

Treasonous difference

The story said Ginsburg, Breyer, O'Connor and Kennedy have held extensive sessions with judges in Europe. Kennedy, it said, has met with numerous Chinese judges – both in the United States and in China. O'Connor has been involved in the American Bar Association's reform initiative in Eastern Europe.

Visiting Communistic Judges in China. Amaraka put these Vipers in Prison or Perish in your lukewarm apostasy

"With emerging democracies groping toward the rule of law, with colleagues on the federal bench volunteering for constitution-writing duties in Iraq, it is not surprising that the justices have begun to see themselves as participants in a worldwide constitutional convention," the New York Times story said ominously.

Global Noahidism

Not all of the justices agree, however. In his dissent in the Texas sodomy case, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the court should not "impose foreign moods, fads or fashions on Americans."

The Sanhedrin of satan's Talmud Bavli "Revived" October 14, 2004, the same Hasidic Pharisees who Crucified the Lord Jesus the Christ. The Jerusalem Council of "Civilization, Jerusalem Council of freemason Obedient Goyim Judaizer Noahides held November 27-30 2004 promoting the Talmudic Noahide Laws, which state if any Stand Firm and Witness that Jesus the Christ is God in the flesh, they shall be Decapitated per Talmud Bavli Tractate Sanhedrin 57a, of the Pharisaic Talmudic Sofiet Judaic shema-GOG, the son's of satan

Beware ! of the Leaven of the Pharisees and their proselyte freemason Judaizers....



J. Julius Scott, Jr., © 1992; rev, 1993
Wheaton College Graduate School
Wheaton, IL 60187

Acts 15:1 depicts the early Christian church at an impasse. It was in Antioch that "certain from Jerusalem taught Gentile converts, 'Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved'" (Acts 15:1). What did Christians believe to be the way of salvation? The road to this point had been long; it had probably taken some 18 years. Acts 2-14 sketches the milestones as Christianity moved into a variety of social, cultural, and racial communities.(1) These contacts forced the young church to face a number of questions culminating in those involving the nature of salvation and related ethical matters. The account demonstrates how "New Testament history is indeed charged with theological implications;"(2) how it was through the events, conflicts, and struggles in its time and culture that the Church of Acts, through the guidance of the Spirit, clarified and shaped theology for its day.

According to Acts, the idyllic harmony of the first days in Jerusalem were broken by conflict between Jews who held to Semitic or Hebraic culture, on the one side, and Hellenistic or Greek on the other. Stephen's speech laid the theological foundations for Christian missions by asserting that God is the universal deity and Jesus the more-than-Jewish-Messianic-Son of Man whom all peoples, nations, and languages should acknowledge.(3)

Through Philip Samaritans and an Ethiopian, groups racially and culturally different but who traditionally had some associations with Israel, embraced the message of Jesus. Saul, a fierce Jewish persecutor of "The Way," was converted through a dramatic confrontation with the risen Christ on the Damascus road. Peter's mission along the Coastal Plain of the Land of Israel was among Jews in frequent contact with Gentiles and therefore under suspicion by the strict practioners of the Jewish life-style in Jerusalem and the secluded Hill Country. It was validated by the healing of Aeneas and the raising of Dorcus from the dead.

Peter visited and preached to the household of Cornelius(4) only after a thrice-repeated vision and a voice from heaven had prepared the way. In making this journey Peter violated tabus related to both race and culture. Cornelius, after all, was a Gentile, an officer in the Roman army of occupation, and uncircumcised. The divine preparation forced Peter to realize that "God shows no partiality" (10:34); and accompanying supernatural signs left the Jerusalem Church no choice but to concur (11:18). Some Jews may have considered Cornelius as a special case, based on his status as a "God fearer" (10:2, 22), one of the good, pious Gentiles allowed limited contact with Judaism by some Jews.(5) Subsequent events saw the proclamation of the gospel to Greeks in Antioch and the conversion of many Gentiles in south central Asia Minor as a result of Paul's first missionary journey.

At some points the Jerusalem Church sent investigators to look into the new developments. The passing of most of the milestones was accompanied by miraculous signs indicating divine approval. Yet, questions were asked: With whom should Jewish Christians associate? What is it permissible to eat? With whom should one eat? What about circumcision? Is it necessary? If so, necessary for what? All of these issues were deeply rooted in Jewish culture, both as parts of the Old Testament Torah and as implements of protectionism against assimilation of the race and culture by the peoples with whom the Hebrews were thrown during the Intertestamental period.

Now, in Antioch, it became clear that the hesitancy and questions raised as new groups were introduced into the Church were but symptoms of a far more significant matter, what is the nature of Christian salvation? Must Gentiles indeed be circumcised and charged to keep the Mosaic customs to be saved? The nature of the new faith was at stake.

The Acts 15 account is the subject of numerous questions and problems.(6) Many, if not the majority, of recent writers on Acts conclude that chapter 15 is either a heavily edited or invented story.(7) I believe there is good reason for holding it to be an abbreviated but accurate portrayal of what occurred. In any case, it stands as a central point in Acts and for that reason alone deserves serious consideration in an attempt to ascertain the author's point of view.(8)

Acts recounts that after there had been "no small dissension and debate" in Antioch (Acts 15:1 f.), Paul, Barnabas and others were appointed (etaxan) to discuss the matter with "the apostles and elders" in Jerusalem. Thus the stage was set for the Council of Jerusalem.

On the way to Jerusalem the Antiochene delegation reported the conversion of the Gentiles to Christians in Phoenicia and Samaria (15:3). Again, in Jerusalem they "declared all that God had done with them" (15:4). In both cases Paul and his group probably took care to make clear that the Gentile Christians were not circumcised nor placed under Torah. In Jerusalem "some from the party of the Pharisees who had believed" made demands similar to those of the Judaizers in Antioch (15:5).

In both locales the Judaizers' requirements imply that Christianity was merely a party within Judaism (granted they held it to be the right party, the righteous remnant(9)) and that the coming of the Messiah had not brought an end to Torah nor significantly altered it.(10) Consequently, membership in the Jesus-Messianic community was open only to natural born Jews or proselytes. Thus, Luke makes it clear that both in Antioch and Jerusalem the issue before the Church involved the nature of the faith and the way of salvation it propounded -- was Christianity a universal religion or merely an extension of Second Temple Judaism? Did the Gentile have to become a Jew a proselyte, a "naturalized Jews," in order to be saved? This involved more than just religious conversion; it required substituting one's own racial alliance and culture for that of the Jews. It meant that certain external allegiances and deeds are a part of the conditions for Christian salvation.

The Church's cross-cultural experience had exposed a major theological issue. How was it now to be solved? It was referred to a meeting in Jerusalem; Acts assumes the church of that city held a recognized authority, the nature of which is not clarified.(11) But, what was to be the basis for making a decision? Certainly not a majority vote; Paul and the Antiochenes could not have gone to a more unfavorable location were that the case. Acts assumes that the meeting(12) sought to determine the will of God.

We do not have the complete "minutes" of the meeting, only a brief summary of the conclusions reached, "after there had been much debate" (vs. 7). It appears that Luke intends to supply only the barest outline of the type of thinking that went into the solution which emerged from the Council. Yet, the account provides important insights into how this was determined. Luke summarizes the position and arguments of the Judaizers in vss. 1, 5, and 7 ff. Inclusion of statements by Peter(13) and James for the Jerusalem Church and by Barnabas and Paul for the Church of the Gentiles is probably intended to demonstrate that the "mainline" position of the Church, both in Jerusalem and elsewhere, recognized that God's will was that uncircumcised Gentiles be included as believers on the basis of justification by faith without Jewish ceremonial requirements.

Two types of evidence went into this decision. First, reviewing experiences of the past indicated how God had worked and reacted in matters related to Gentiles who believed in Jesus. Peter cited the Cornelius incident as a "precedent case" in which the principles involved in the issue before the Council had already been established and accepted by the Church. As the uncircumcised Gentile Cornelius had been brought into the community at the direction (vs. 7) and with the approval (vs. 8) of God, so all uncircumcised Gentiles are fit candidates for membership in the Church. Jewish and Gentile believers stand on equal footing before God for he makes "no distinction," he is not a "respecter of persons" (15:9; comp. 10:34; cf. 15:11). The Christian way of salvation, he says, is by grace through faith in Jesus (vs. 11, cf. vs 9).(14)

Barnabas and Paul then "related what signs and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them" (vs. 12). They are said to have laid stress upon what God had done, evidenced by visible manifestations. Thus they employed the same argument Peter had used when questioned following his visit to Cornelius (cf. Acts 11:5 ff., esp. vs 17). The Judaizers were then placed in the position of denying the validity of the missionaries' reports, opposing what God had ordered and confirmed, or yielding the point.

Appeal to Scripture is the second type of evidence employed by the Council for determining the will of God. This, Luke says, was the contribution of James, the Relative of Jesus, 

James the so-called Just, is not the Brother of the ONLY Begotten Son of God. James was the son of Zebedee. Now, was Mary the Virgin united in Adultery with Zebedee? Treasonous Blasphemous Vipers Wake up !


who at that time was the acknowledged leader of the Jerusalem Church and probably the official most likely to be favorable to the Judaizer's position. 

For by these Talmudic Laws, This James and all the Judaeo-Churchinsanity Proselytes of zion, undermind the Absolute Authority of the King of Kings, Salvation given Freely by not be deceived

For the third time in this account (in the span of eight verses) the author notes the emphasis that it was God who had ordained that Gentiles should be brought into the Christian fellowship. This James supports by quoting Amos 9:11-12.(15) On the basis of this and similar OT passages(16) first century Jews were looking for the exaltation of the Davidic Messiah and the submission of the Gentiles to his rule. In Acts 15 the Church, with James as its spokesman, claims that this is precisely what was happening in the Gentile mission.

Setting up the coming Talmudic Judaic zionist Moshiach the Proselytes too, will accept, for they are apostate in the Leaven of the rib-eye Hasidic rabid Chabad Lubavitcher son's of the synagogues of satan

James affirmed that the type of evidence from experience related by Peter and by Paul and Barnabas, was precisely what, on the basis of the Hebrew Scriptures, should have been expected. Thus, the way Luke selects and presents material, by his associating influential Church leaders with the views expressed in Acts 15:7-19, and by his claim that the letter from the Council was sent in the name of "the apostles, and the elders, with the whole Church" (vs. 22) he indicates the conviction that an accord was reached which rejected the necessity of Gentiles submitting to circumcision and other Jewish observances as conditions for Christian salvation. I suggest a summary of the Council's findings to this point might have looked something like this:

The Council thus recognized that experience has shown that God did not require Cornelius and the other Gentiles to become proselytes before giving his approval to their Christian profession. This is consistent with the predictions about the Final Age of Salvation History found in the OT. Therefore, we must conclude that it is not necessary for Gentiles to become proselytes (including submitting to circumcision and accepting the yoke of Torah) in order to become Christians. We must realize that the scope of the new Israel is much broader than that of old Israel; the Messianic community established by Jesus includes all, Jews and Gentiles, circumcised and uncircumcised, who have received the grace of God by faith in Jesus.

Other than holding tenaciously to the fact and implications of monotheism, covenant, and Torah, Second Commonwealth Judaism was more concerned with right actions (orthopraxy) than right belief (orthodoxy). It is little wonder that the convocation in Jerusalem moved immediately to face some of the practical implications that its theological conclusions would inevitably raise in predominately Jewish communities.

At least three facts lie behind the proceedings recorded in the rest of Acts 15. First, the doctrine of salvation by grace through faith does not mean there are no moral and ethical standards for Christians. Jewish Christians were well aware that Gentile ways of life and moral standards could be vastly different from those acceptable within Christianity. The "side effects" or "pollutions" of idolatry might remain as ingrained habits long after the Gentile believer had given up the actual worship of idols. In addition, not all Gentile sexual irregularities, abortions, murder of slaves, infanticides, etc. were performed as acts of pagan worship. Jewish aversion to table fellowship with Gentiles was based upon more than fear of meat which had been dedicated in a pagan temple. Gentile practices and attitudes at these points were often interrelated as parts of a life style engendered by the pagan cultures from which the Gentile Christians came. Another complicating fact was that paganism did not necessarily associate a particular ethic with a given religious commitment; Gentile Christians had to be taught that faith and practice are inseparably related.

Secondly, just as it was clear that Gentiles did not have to disavow totally their national and cultural origins, neither were Jewish Christians required to reject theirs. This is not plainly stated in the text but is implied(17) by Paul's later assumption of a Jewish vow (Acts 18:18), his claim to "become as a Jew to the Jews" (I Cor 9:20), and the continuing practice of at least some Jewish ceremonies by Jewish Christians evidenced in both the New Testament and other early Christian records. This was complicated by the fact that most Gentiles disregarded and actually held animosity for the Jewish ways of life, especially for their dietary restrictions and other regulations for ceremonial purity.

Finally, Jewish Christians were faced with the dilemma. How could they accept and associate with Gentile believers, as Christianity affirmed, and at the same time separate themselves from such individuals, situations, and foods that would render them ceremonially unclean and consequently unacceptable by their Jewish co-religionists and countrymen.

Continued to remained yoked to the curse of the Law

In other words, an understanding of the cultural differences between Jews and Greeks, appears to have forced the Council to face the implications of its soteriological decision. It had to hold high the banner of the monotheistic nature of Christianity in the midst of a world in which syncretism was common. It had to affirm the fact of ethical implications of Christianity and to provide Gentile Christians with some guidelines for Christian living. Furthermore, a framework was needed to permit Jewish Christians to accept and associate with Gentile believers while, at the same time, maintaining the regulations which would make possible their continued participation in at least parts of Jewish culture and their association with non-Christian, practicing Jews. To be effective, any such framework must be acceptable by non-Christian as well as believing Jews.

No-Hide Laws

I suggest it was to meet just such a cross-cultural challenge that the so-called "decrees" of the Jerusalem Council were put forward (15:20, 29; cf. 21:25). In the canonical text these state that Gentile Christian should abstain (or "keep away") from (1) the pollution of idols; (2) fornication (or "unchastity"); (3) things strangled; and (4) blood. The fact of variant text forms of the decrees(18) is well known.(19) There is also uncertainty on the meaning of "abstain from blood." Is it a moral prohibition against murder or a ceremonial restriction against ingesting blood?

In the Jewish interpretive methods (Oral Tradition which make the WORD of none effect) of the day a part could stand for the whole and items and texts could be gathered together and interpreted as a single group.(20) Hence, "pollution of idols" might not only affirm monotheism but also reject all that went with idolatry. All sexual sins and acts of violence would be included in the prohibitions against fornication and "blood," if, indeed, this refers to murder. The prohibition against "things strangled" and "blood," if the latter is a dietary injunction, must then be understood as including the whole spectrum of Jewish regulations for clean and unclean. In short, the decrees may refer to the three major concerns faced by Jews when associating with Gentiles (1) idolatry and all associated with it, (2) low ethical and moral standards among Gentiles, and (3) Gentile disregard for Jewish ceremonies, customs, and religio-cultural tabus.

Totally rejecting Salvation freely Given by Grace Alone

Both OT and later forms of Judaism already contained provisions and regulations for Jewish-Gentile association. The OT placed certain restrictions upon the "stranger," the ger, that permitted the Gentile who complied with them to live in the land of Israel as a resident alien.(21) Lev. 17 and 18 lists certain prohibitions which are in precisely the same order as three of the "decrees" of Acts 15.(22) Within Hellenistic Judaism both Josephus and the Sibylline Oracles refer to observances of Jewish laws and customs by Gentiles.(23) Rabbinic writings list laws(24) which the Rabbis felt were binding upon all the sons of Noah, i.e., all of mankind, but practically speaking, could be required only of the "stranger" (ger) and God-fearers.

There is no difference in jew or gentile for they who have put on faith in Jesus the Christ. Judaism is only a religion, and in no wise can a religious jew of talmudic Judaism have Christ Jesus. Only if they convert into Christ by faith, and then they are no longer a flesh Jew but a new creature in Jesus the Christ. These deceiving Vipers of the "Replacement Theology" have elected to be cast from the True Vine of The Creator the ROOT. Only the True Branches are remained in Jesus the Lord. When these branched which were cast off from the Root's Vine for their rejection of the Vine, Repent in the same Christ the Word the Creator, then THEY can be Grafted Back into the Vine the Word which Abraham believed. It is not the Talmudic Judaic Version of the zionazi's which are attempting to have the stupid apostate Goyim grafted into them who they say are the ROOT and them who say they are the True Vine. These to will be cut-off from the True Vine the Root and the Offspring the Lord Jesus the Christ, God come in the Flesh the same since the Beginning....DO YOU UNDERSTAND ?


It is, therefore, obvious that there already existed within Second Temple Judaism some expectations of Gentiles who desired associations with Jews. 

Dig into the Wall Ezekiel and see what these ancient Giborim do in the House of the LORD, see their Abominations they do........Ezek 8


These regulations protected against idolatry, provided at least minimal moral and ethical guidelines, insisted upon some sensitivity toward Jewish dietary laws and other parts of Kashrut.

These yokes which satan will snare all whose names are not written in  the Lamb's Book of Life since the foundation of the world, say that if any man stands firm for the Testimony of Jesus the Christ, whom they say is a bastard and the son of a whore and a ROMAN Soldier, and who is in hell boiling in human excrement, IS not of Christ Jesus, But of the Talmudic Freemason James the Just and the so-called apostate heretic "Jerusalem Council" and that Council is now "Revived with the Sanhedrin" the Beast is Risen....BEWARE of the Leaven of these Pharisees I beg you people to understand in the name above all names Jesus the Christ the LORD God and his Father


 Certainly those regulations which came from outside the OT as well as the classification "God Fearer," would not necessarily have been accepted by all Jews. But at least they provided some framework for Jewish-Gentile association, acceptable by both Christian and at least some non-Christian Jews. It was on some such basis that James could put forward as an argument for the decrees that "from early generations Moses has had in every city those who preach him, for he is read every sabbath in the synagogues" (vs 21).

as is in "AMARAKA"

The wording of the letter communicating the Council's decision is instructive regarding the purpose of the "decrees." They are described as "these necessary things" (toutwn twn epanagkeV) but without any indication for what they are necessary (vs 28). After listing the decrees vs 29 simply stated, "If you keep yourselves from these you will do well (eu praxete)." They are not of the essence of Christian salvation, but rather speak to the order of the Church.

Gone apostate for Iniquity doth Already work

There are numerous issues and questions arising from the Acts 15 account of the Council of Jerusalem which we cannot consider here. It remains to summarize the major implications of our study. We have been reminded of the inseparable relationship between faith and history, between the experiences of God's people and the clarification and precise stating of theology. It is evident that cross-cultural exposure was good for the Church; it forced facing issues which led to clarifications and better understanding of the revelation, the will, and the work of God and his purpose.

and work the Leaven of the Pharisees who are now doing the exact same to complacent apostate Churchinsanity

There are matters that transcend culture; on these there could be no compromise. In them the very heart of the Christian faith is at stake. Hence, Luke asserts that the Jerusalem Council acknowledged the principle of salvation by grace through faith as the soteriological position of the Church. Conversely, it refused to require that Gentiles be circumcized and obey the Mosaic Torah. For Christianity is a universal religion, it is not bound to any one national, racial, or cultural group. There can be no requirements for inclusion in the fellowship of Christians (= the Church) which God has not made for salvation. Specifically, this means that national, racial, and cultural restrictions as, absolute requirements, have no place within Christian theology. True religion offers salvation by grace, as a gift. False religion, including paganism and idolatry, seeks and worships false gods. It may also seek to obtain the favor of the right God in the wrong way. Legalistic religion is one form of such false religion, it may include seeking salvation through the laws and ceremonies of Judaism; it also includes any attempt to obtain salvation through any form of human effort.

Furthermore, while Christian salvation is a free gift, apart from law and other forms of human effort, it is not devoid of ethical and moral implications for those who have received God's grace. There are great spiritual principles that are rooted in the nature of God which affect behavior. God's jealousy for his own position is the basis for the condemnation of idolatry and all that goes with it. There are also moral and ethical principles in God's nature which are the basis for universal right and wrong. The Christian, the individual in personal relation to God, who seeks to conform life and actions to these principles, will avoid doing anything offensive to God and, positively, will do that which pleases him. Prohibitions against sexual impropriety and murder are but a part of the whole of the moral law which governs the life of one who has been saved by grace and desires to live in a way pleasing God.

In addition there are matters that are rooted in local and cultural practices and attitudes. They do not involve basic spiritual or moral principles and in them the Christian may exercise freedom but always within the context of love and responsibility.(25) In these the Christian is free from the obligation to conform as a mandate based on God's will and nature. At the same time love and responsibility requires sensitivity for the effects of behavior upon God, other Christians, and unbelievers. In determining conduct in non-spiritual or ethical matters, love for God will always cause one to ask, "What effect will this or that action have upon the non-Christian's view of God and of his church?"

Concern for the fellow Christian prompts one to act responsibly and lovingly, with sensitivity. The Christian may need to adapt conduct out of deference to personal feelings or cultural preferences of those who are fellow members of the household of God. This seems to be the spirit behind the inclusion of abstinence from "things strangled" within the list of things "necessary" in order to "do well" in the cultural mix of Jewish and Gentile Christians in the Levant(26) in the first century.

The implications are obvious. Broad exposure, the consequence of the universality of the Church, will raise issues parochial Christians will never see. In those matters which are of the essence of the Church there can be no compromise. In matters of cultural or personal preference, the principles of freedom and responsibility, of charity and sensitivity, must reign as the Church seek to adapt to changing circumstances, situations, and cultures.

Appendix 1

The MT and LXX versions of Acts 9:11-12, and Acts 15:16-18 compared:(27)

Amos 9:11-12, MT (RSV)

In that day I will raise up the booth of David that is fallen and repair its breaches, and raise up its ruins, and rebuild it as in the days of old; {12} that they may possess the remnant of Edom and all the nations who are called by my name," says the Lord who does this.

Jesus the Christ the Root and the offspring who hath created the House of David, who will re-establish his House on his Mount in Heaven Sion, and Jesus the temple torn down and risen on the Third Day the Light of it, and the Lamb sacrificed therein, Salvation and the Groom of his New Bride New Jerusalem, and you who believe in truth and His Righteousness are the invited Guest, and the Bride says Come my Children

Amos 9:11-12, LXX

In that day I will raise up the tabernacle of David which has fallen, and will rebuild the its ruins, and will set up its parts that have been broken down, and I will build it up as in the former days: {12} that the rest of men, and all the Gentiles, who are called by my name, says the Lord who does all these things.

Acts 15:16-18 (RSV)

After this I will return, and I will rebuild the dwelling of David, which has fallen; I will rebuild its ruins, and I will set it up, {17} that the rest of men may seek the Lord and all the Gentiles who are called by my name, {18} says the Lord, who has made these things known from of old.

The LXX represents a spiritualized and universalized interpretation of the prediction of the restoration of David's sovereignty and its renewed extension over the Gentile nations. The ascription of this LXX reading to James is one of those internal factors in Acts 15 which have caused some scholars to doubt the historical accuracy of the Council record.

The implied assumption that the type of interpretation represented in the LXX version of Amos 9:11-12 was current only in those circles in which the LXX text was used is questionable at best. Nevertheless, the attack on Acts 15 rising out of the ascription of a distinctively LXX quotation to James warrants further examination. The quotation may indeed indicate that Luke was composing freely without regard to the actual occurrence of a meeting. There are, however, other possible explanations. Luke may have known of such a Council as described in Acts 15 and that Amos 9:11-12 played a part in its deliberations. In his account he may have then quoted from the LXX without realizing its difference from the MT. Again, he may have deliberately placed this form of the passage in James' mouth because, in his opinion, it accurately represented the position and type of argumentation James used (or might have used) in these circumstances. Finally, James may actually have quoted from the LXX and intended the interpretation suggested in Acts 15.

It should be observed that those who reject the legitimacy of the form and setting of Amos 9:11-12 in Acts 15 make three assumptions which are not beyond question. They assume (1) the accuracy of the extra-Biblical picture of James as an Aramaic-speaking Hebraic Christian who was deeply devoted to traditional legalistic Jewish piety, (2) that the MT represents the oldest and/or the only form of the Hebrew text, and (3) that the MT rendering of Amos 9:11-12 is incompatible with the interpretation built upon it in Acts 15.

The assumed strict Hebraic character of James assumes the accuracy of the portrayal of him in the descriptions of Hegesippus-Eusebius (EH 2.23) and other post-NT writings. This is not necessarily the case.(28) At this point it should be noted that if he was a member of the family of Jesus, as Gal. 1:19(29) and virtually all early tradition attest, then almost certainly he came from Galilee. Galilee had a much closer contact with the Greek world and language than did Judea.(30) Consequently, there is every reason to assume that James spoke Greek and was familiar with the LXX. Since Greek was probably the primary language of "the others" from Antioch who attended the Council (vs. 2), the whole or a part of the proceedings, including James' summation, may have been in Greek in deference to them.

Furthermore, the possible fluidity of the state of the Hebrew text in the first century makes it unwise to put too much emphasis on the difference between the MT and LXX. As C. C. Torrey pointed out

We do not know to what extent the Greek varied from the Aramaic -- or rather, Hebrew. . . . Rabbi Akiba and his followers had not yet set up a 'standard' text of the Prophets; the author of this Aramaic document [the source Torrey sees behind Acts 15] was at liberty to select the reading which best suited his purpose; and the LXX rendering of Amos 9.11 f. certainly represented a varying Hebrew (italics his) text.(31)

the rabbi's of Talmud set up the Council at Jerusalem

Recent discovery may have added some support to this statement. Although such ancient sources as the Targum of Jonathan and the Peshitta agree with the MT, such Dead Sea documents as 4Q Florilegium and CDC 7:16, with Acts 15, read, "And I will build (causative) the tabernacle of David" as opposed to "In that day I will raise up (imperfect)" of both the MT and LXX. In any case, C. C. Torrey make a very important point.

The Bible is not Holy, it has been Tampered with. Jesus said Beware of the Scribes. KJV only have made it into an Idol, and they worship the KJV and know not that it is only Pen and Ink in a Leather Binder. The Bible only Gives Witness of Jesus the Christ from the beginning to the Ending and He alone the LIVING WORD is HOLY, and his WORD by faith is written into the hearts of them who believe the Word the Living Word Jesus the Christ.....DO NOT BE DECEIVED

Even our Massoretic Hebrew would have served the present purpose admirably, since it predicts that 'the tabernacle of David,' i.e., the Church of the Messiah, would 'gain possession of all the nations which were called by the name [of the God of Israel].' Cf. vs. 14 where we are told that this quotation was expected to prove: o qeoV epeskeyato labein ex eqnwn laon tw onomati autou(32) [="God made provision to take out from among the Gentiles a people for his own name"].Historical Prblems related to Acts 15

His Chosen

  1. Discrepencies between Acts 15 and Gal 2
  2. Relation between Paul's opponents Gal and Acts
  3. James' quotation from the LXX
  4. The nature and purpose of the decrees
  5. Paul's silence on the "decrees" in his epistles
  6. The assumption that Paul learns of the decrees for the first time in Acts 21.

Alex.-Byz. | P 45, etc.(33) | Western | Tertullian ___________________________________________________________________

1. Twn alisghmatwn| t. a. | t. a. | sacrificiis(34)

twn eidwlwn(35)| t. ei.| t. ei.|

[cf. vs. 29,| | |

apecesqai | | |

eidwloqutwn]| | |

| | |

2. ThV porneiaV| __________ | t. p. | fornicationibus

| | |

3. pniktou| p. | __________ |

| | |

4. tou aipatoV| t. ai. | t. ai. | _____________(36)

| | |

| | kai osa mh |

| | qelousin |

| | eautoiV |

| | mh poieite |

(1) J. Julius Scott, Jr. "The Church's Progress to the Council of Jerusalem," Paper read at the National Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society, Kansas City, MO, November 1991.

Judeao-Proselytes of zion of the flesh

(2) F. F. Bruce, New Testament History (Garden City: NJ: Doubleday, 1972), ix.

(3) J. Julius Scott, Jr., "Stephen's Speech and the World Mission of the People of God," (JETS, 21/2 [1978]), 131-141.

(4) J. Julius Scott, Jr., "The Cornelius Incident in the Light of its Jewish Setting" (JETS 34/4 [1991]), 475-484.

(5) The Greek foboumenoi ton qeon" = "who feared God" [RSV]) and sebomenoi ton qeon = "worshiper of God," [RSV]) (or simply sebomenoi) seems to refer to an unofficial class of Gentiles who stopped short of becoming full proselytes but were permitted limited participation (by some Jews) in Jewish worship. These individuals, "God Fearers," worshiped Yahweh only, practiced imageless worship, attended the synagogue, observed the Sabbath and food-laws, and conformed to other basic elements of Jewish law and tradition. See Kirsopp Lake, "Proselytes and God-Fearers,"Beginnings of Christianity (1933; reprint Grand Rapids: Baker, 1966), V, 74-96; G. Kuhn, "sebomenoi or foboumenoi ton qeon" TDNT VI, 743-744. For recent restudy of this group see Max Wilcox, "The 'God-Ferars' in Acts - A Reconsideration," JSNT (1981), 102-122 and three articles in BAR 12/5 (Sept/Oct, 1986), "Robert S. MacLennan and Thomas Kraabel, "The God-Fearers -- A Literary and Theological Invention," pp.47-53; Robert Tannenbaum, "Jews and God-Fearers in the Holy City of Aphrodite," pp. 55-57; Louis Feldman, "The Omnipresence of God-Fearers," pp.59-63.

YWVH the Tetragrammaton who has no Only Begotten SON, Jesus the Christ......and they are back, two fold the children of hell as their beloved men who love to be called "Rabbi" in the marketplace of Mammon

(6) Some of the more important include (1) apparent discrepancies between Acts 15 and Gal 2 which seem to describe the same or a similar meeting, (2) the relation between Paul's opponents in Galatians and Acts, (3) James' quotation from the LXX in Acts 15:16-18, (4) the nature and purpose of the "decrees" (Acts 15:20, 29), (5) Paul's silence on the "decrees" in his epistles, and (6) the assumption that Paul learns of the decrees for the first time in Acts 21.

(7) Approaches to Luke-Acts are varied. There is both a long history of investigations as well as on-going assessments. For an accounting of the past see Ward W. Gasque, A History of the Criticism of the Acts of the Apostles (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1975); C. K. Barrett, Luke the Historian in Recent Study (Peake Memorial Lecture; London: Epworth Press, 1961) assess the initial stages of the current movement toward regarding Luke as a theologian rather than a (reliable) historian.

There is no need for further assessments, for they are now openly "REVEALED" by the same LORD since the Beginning. It is the Lord Almighty Alone who have allowed them to do their evil in spite of His Salvation, for by their Laws they themselve's will be Judged and cast out of His Kingdom for ever. For he alone is the Law Fulfilled

Martin Dibelius is usually credited with beginning the Form Critical study of Acts in his essays now collected in Studies in the Acts of the Apostles. Translated by Mary Ling; edited by Heindrich Greeven (London: SCM Press, 1956). This volume contains a separate treatment of "The Apostolic Council."

Building upon the work of Dibelius and others, Hans Conzelmann promoted the Redactional Critical investigation to Luke-Acts in his The Theology of St. Luke. Trans. by Geoffrey Buswell (London: Faber and Faber, 1960) and Acts of the Apostles Trans by J. Limburg, A. Thomas Kraabel and D. A. Juel (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987). This was furthered by Ernst Haenchen in The Acts of the Apostles, A Commentary. Trans by Bernard Nobel and Gerald Shinn with Hugh Anderson and R. McL. Wilson. (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1971). This approach is also displayed in the essays in Leander E. Keck and J. Louis Martyn, eds. Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1966). These writers and those who follow them tend, in one way or another, to be suspicious of the historicity of much of Luke-Acts.

And well they should for the Leaven has now ruined almost the whole loaf

Examples of contemporary approaches to Acts which affirm its historical reliability are exemplified by Colin J. Hemer, The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History. (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1989); F. F. Bruce, The Acts of the Apostles: Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary. (3d ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990) and Commentary on the Book of the Acts (NICNT; Rev ed; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988); Martin Hengel, Acts and the History of Earliest Christianity. Trans by John Bowden. (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979); I. Howard Marshall, The Acts of the Apostles. An Introduction and Commentary. (TNTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980) and Luke Historian and Theologian. (Enlarged ed.; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1989); David J. Williams. Acts (New International Bible Commentary; Peabody, MASS: Hendrickson, 1990).

Even more recent attitudes are reflected in Charles H. Talbert, ed. Luke Acts: New Perspectives from the Society of Biblical Literature Seminar (New York: Crossroads, 1984). Of particular interest for this study is Earl Richard, "The Divine Purpose: The Jews and the Gentile Mission (Acts 15)," 188-209 who provides helpful in sights with essentially a structuralist approach.

(8) I have dealt at length with the Council of Jerusalem, its interpretation and issues related to it, in my doctoral thesis "The History and Influence of the Church of Jerusalem, A.D. 30-100: An Investigation of the Growth of Internal Factions and the Extension of its Influence in the Larger Church." (Presented to the University of Manchester, England, 1969. [Available through University Microfilms International. 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106; publication No. 1-8635.00), 169-197.

(9) Cf. Bruce, Commentary on Acts, 302.

(10) W.D. Davies, Torah in the Messianic Age and/or the Age to Come (JBL Monograph; Philadelphia: Society of Biblical Literature, 1952) cf. The Setting of Sermon on the Mount (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1964).

(11) The Western text recasts 15:2 to place the initiative for this action with the Judaizers; the canonical text actually favors this interpretation. Grammatically it is quite natural to take oi katelqonteV apo thV ?IoudaiaV as the subject of etaxan. Peter and John's visit to Samaria (8:14 ff.) and Barnabas' mission to Antioch (11:22 ff.) also confirm that Luke regards the Jerusalem Church as having some authority over other Churches (Acts 20:38; 21:5). Elsewhere in Acts propempw means "to accompany," "to escort" rather than "to send forth." The Judaizers in Antioch appear to have thought they represented the official Jerusalem position and it is only natural to assume they were the ones who appealed to their home Church. Peter's withdrawal from fellowship with Gentiles may have given them reason to expect support from at least one of the Pillars.

Paul severely reprimanded Peter for the Judaism he put forth.

Paul also acknowledged at least some priority for the Jerusalem Church. He may have argued (as he does in Gal. 2) that previously the Jerusalem leaders had not objected to his gospel. He doubtless was anxious for the Jerusalem Pillars to clearly and openly state their position. Nevertheless, it is hardly possible that Paul and his followers were willing to submit to a trial in Jerusalem as indicated in the Western text; the sentiments of Gal. 1:8 f. do not characterize a man whose adherence to principles could be altered by the majority vote of any body or court.

Trial because Paul refused to teach their Talmudic laws of Noahide

(12) Acts 15:4, speaks of "the church and the apostles and the elders," later Luke mentions "all the multitude" (vs. 12), and "the whole church" (vs. 22), probably referring to one or more general meetings of the Church at Jerusalem. Vs. 6 (comp. vs 2) may envision a smaller gathering of the Judaizers, Paul's party, and "the apostles and elders," where the real work of deliberation was conducted.

(13) If Luke's chronology is accurate, Peter, having earlier escaped from prison (Acts 12:1 ff.), was a fugitive from the secular authorities in Jerusalem at the time of the Council. Consequently, some students have disregarded this notice of his presence or used it is an argument for dating the Council prior to Peter's arrest. However, Luke (and the other Gospel writers) has noted earlier occasions, following the deaths of Jesus and Stephen, when Peter (and other Apostles) were present in Jerusalem in spite of personal danger. Also, Peter's chief persecutor, Herod Agrippa I, was probably dead by the time of the Acts 15 Council.

(14) Some commentators (e.g., Haenchen, Acts, 459; R. P. C. Hanson, Acts, 160 f) have thought them too Hellenistic and/or Pauline to admit as Petrine utterances. While the Pharisees would not have described Torah as a "yoke" or "burden" such sentiments might well be characteristic of a Palestinian "average Jew" from Galilee (so Bruce, Acts: Greek Text, 337 f). The doctrine of universal salvation by repentance and faith in Jesus presented here is essentially the same as that of the Petrine speeches (Acts 2 :21 = Joel 2:32; Acts 2:28 f.; 3:19; 4:12; 5:31; 10:42); it is the soteriology to be expected of one who approved and added nothing to Paul's gospel (Gal. 2:2, 6 ff.) and is in harmony with the emphasis upon salvation by faith in the epistle ascribed to Peter (I Pet. 1:5, 9, 18 ff., esp. 21; 2:6 f.; 3:18 ).

(15) See Appendix 1.

(16) Note that Isa 11:10, "him shall the nations seek," is quoted by James.

(17) But Justin Martyr, Dialog 47, acknowledges that some second century Gentile Christians did not believe a Jew could be saved if he continues to observe Jewish institutions.

(18) The Western text (including D and Irenaeus Against Heresies 3:12,14) omits "things strangled" but adds a negative form of the "golden rule:" "And whatever you do not wish to be done to you, do not to others." Tertullian (On Modesty 12) not only follows D by omitting "things strangled" but also omits the negative rule (but he mentions that Christians abstain from eating "things strangled" in Apology 9 and quotes the negative rule in Against Marcion 4:16). P45 (the Chester Beatty papyrus) supports Origen (Against Celsus 8:29) and the Rendel Harris manuscript of Didascalia by retaining "things strangled" but omitting "fornication."

The order given above is that of Acts 15:20. Two other places in Acts, in which the decrees are given, the order is different. For an example, in the Alexandrian-Byzantine text the order in Acts 15:29 is 1, 4, 3, 2; in 21:25 it is 1, 4, 2, 3.

(19) I have dealt with these elsewhere, see my "The Church of Jerusalem," 181-183 and "Textual Variants of the "Apostolic Decree' and their Setting in the Early Church," The Living and Active Word of God: Studies in Honor of Samuel J. Schultz (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1983), 171-183.

(20) See Moses Mielziner, Introduction to the Talmud (5th ed; New York: Bloch, 1968), 117-187 and Herman L. Strack and G. Stemberger. Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash. Trans by Markus Bockmuehl (Edinburgh: T and T Clark, 1991), 17-34 Cf., Daniel Patte. Early Jewish Hermeneutics in Palestine (Missoula, Montana: Scholars Press 1975); Michael Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1985); E Schürer, The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ. ed and rev by G. Vermes, F. Miller, and M. Black (Edinburgh: T and T Clark, 1979) II, 314-380.

(21) Such individuals were to abstain from blaspheming the name of Yahweh (YWVH) (Lev. 24:16, 22), from idols (Lev. 20:2), from sorcery, incest, and other abominations (Lev. 18:26), from marriage within prohibited degrees (Lev. 18:6-26), and from working on the Sabbath day (Ex. 20:10; 23:12.). The stranger was also bound by the same sacrificial ordinances as the Israelites (Lev. 17:8; Num. 15:14); certain feasts (of Weeks and Tabernacles) were to be seasons of rejoicing for him (Deut. 16:11, 14); he was not permitted to eat leaven bread during the Passover season (Ex. 12:19), but was forbidden to share the Paschal meal (Ex. 12:42 ff.). He was to cease from all work on Yom ha-Kippurim (Lev. 16:29). This summary is from E. G. Hirsch, "Gentile," Jew. Ency. V, 615 f.

(22) Although primarily addressed "to Aaron and his sons and to all the people of Israel" (17:1, etc.) these injunctions are also clearly considered as binding upon the "stranger" (cf. 17:8, 10, 12, 13, 15; 18:26). They may be divided into three general categories. (1) Lev. 17:1-9 restricts the offering of sacrifices to the central sanctuary; vs. 7 makes clear that this control is intended as a preventive measure against idolatry. (2) Lev. 17:10-16 prohibits the eating of blood or of flesh with blood still in it. (3) Lev. 18:6-23 deals with several types of sexual perversions.

(23) Josephus (Against Apion II:39 [282]) claims to know of numerous Gentiles who observed the Jewish Sabbath and food laws. The Sibylline Oracles IV:24 ff., 162 ff. pronounce a blessing on those (Gentiles) who recognize the true God, abstain from idolatry and idolatrous sacrifices, murder, violence, theft, and immorality. They also speak of washing "from head to foot in running streams."

(24) Six of these commandments are said to have been enjoined upon Adam: (l) not to worship idols; (2) not to blaspheme the name of God; (3) to establish courts of justice; (4) not to kill; (5) not to commit adultery; and (6) not to rob. A seventh commandment, not to eat flesh which had been cut from a living animal (cf. Gen. 9:4), was added after the flood.

ONLY in the oral tradition of the Pharisaic Talmudic rib-eyes

Although the Talmud frequently speaks of the "seven laws of the sons of Noah," the Rabbinic lists vary in number from six to more than thirty; cf. Julius H. Greenstone, "Laws, Noachian," Jew. Ency. VIII, 648 ff.; Schürer , HJP II:2, 381, n. 297

66 + 6

Lists of the seven Noachian laws differ slightly in content, order and wording. The above list is given by Greenstone, 648 f. Gen. R. Noah XXXIV (quoted by Montefiore and Lowe, Anthology, 556) prohibits (1) idolatry, (2) incest,(3) shedding of blood, (4) profanation of the name of God,(5) injustice, (6) robbery, (7) cutting off flesh from a living animal. The Talmud, Sanhedrin 56b commands: (1) obedience to those in authority, (rib-eyes) (2) to sanctify the name of God, (3) to abstain from idolatry, (4) to commit no fornication, (5) to do no murder, (6) not to steal, and (7) not to eat living flesh,i.e., flesh with blood in it.

Their god has No Only Begotten Son, and if you say that Jesus is God come in the flesh as they hated Jesus they will hate his servants even more, and them too they will seek to slay by their Laws and their Laws is death by decapitation to a "Goyim" in Jesus the Christ 

(25) For this terminology I am indebted to F. F. Bruce, both his lectures and The Letter of Paul to the Romans: An Introduction and Commentary (TNTC; Rev ed; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1985), 230-244; comp Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977).

(26) The intended destination of the "decrees" is not clear. Acts 15:22 says they were sent "to Antioch." The text of the letter begun in the following verse addresses "brethren who are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia." 16:4 implies they were "delivered for observance" in South Central Asia Minor (the places Paul and Barnabas visited during their first missionary journey). There may be allusions to the decrees in 2 Pet 2:12 and Rev 2:14, 29 (also Tertullian, Apology, 9; Eusebius EH 5:1,26; Clementine Recognitions 1:19; 4:38; and Homilies 7:8; 8:19) which imply a much wider distribution and knowledge of the decrees.

(27) For detail discussion of the variation between the MT and LXX see Bruce, Acts: Greek Text, 339-341; C. S. C. Williams, A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles (BNTC; A. and C. Black, 1957), 182.

(28) See my "James the Relative of Jesus and the Expectation of an Eschatological Priest," (JETS 25/3 [September, 1982]), 323-331.

James the Imposter freemason who is no Brother the ONLY BEGOTTEN SON of God the Father

(29) Cf. Mk 6:3; Matt. 13:55.

(30) Seán Freyne, Galilee From Alexander the Great to Hadrian, 323 B.C.E. to 135 C.E. (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press, 1980; G. Mussies, "Greek in Palestine and the Diaspora," The Jewish People in the First Century (Compendia Rerum Judaicarum ad Novum Testamentum; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976), 1:2,1065-1064; Martin Hengel, Judaism and Hellenism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974), 1, 55-106; J. A. Fitzmyer, "The Languages of Palestine in the First Century," CBQ 32 (1970), 501-531; J. N. Sevenster, Do you Know Greek? How Much Greek Could the First Century Jewish Christians Have Known? (Supplement to Nov Test; Leiden: Brill, 1969); Saul Liebermann, Greek in Jewish Palestine (New York: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1942).

(31) The Composition and Date of Acts (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1916), 38 f,

(32) Ibid, 38 f.

(33) Origen, Against Celsus 8:29 and the Harris manuscript of the Didascalia (noted by E. Preuschen, Die Apostelgeschichte [HNT; Tübingen: 1912], 97).

Origen locates the scene of the Council at Antioch rather than in Jerusalem. While he may have known of a P 45-type text, this discrepancy may indicate that Origen was (1) quoting freely and omitted pniktou either by design or by accident, or (2) was familiar with a tradition independent of Acts which located the Council in Antioch and gave a tri-partite version of the decrees.

(34) Cf. On Modesty 12:4. In commenting on the Acts passage Tertullian thrice (On Modesty 12:5, 8, 11) uses "idololatria."

(35) The RSV and Lake (BC V, 205) translate this phrase "abstain from the pollution of idols." Thus this element is interpreted not strictly as a prohibition of eating meat offered to idols or as a prohibition of participation in a pagan rite, but as a reference to idolatry in general and all that was associated with it. Cf. C. S. C. Williams, Alterations, 73; Acts, 178.

(36) Although Tertullian does not mention the negative form of the Golden rule in connection with the decrees he quotes it elsewhere, Against Marcion 4:16.

Tampered by the Pharisaic Leaven the scribes


Now one more time see their NEW REVIVED Jerusalem Council of their New Word Order and the One World Religion unto their god, and to their Coming False Christ they are About to REVEAL, that Moshiach ben David whose Mark of his name is the Magan David that six pointed star they made with their own hands to Moloch

Jerusalem Council of Civilizations

Goals and Rationale

The Jerusalem Summit to be held on November 28, 2004, will launch the development of the Council of Civilizations, which is intended to evolve into a new model for unifying the international community and providing it with an ethical compass.

The seven Laws of Noahide

The Council of Civilizations may be described as a “Voice of Ethics” for the international community, with the goal of working alongside the United Nations to fill the gap which exists in its structure.

A great deal of criticism has been voiced at the United Nations for failing in this task because it has no accountability and therefore does not command the respect of its member states. A true and lasting venue for constructive engagement must be built upon universal ethical principles: a foundation that all sides recognize as sacred. There is only one place in the world that commands the respect and awe of a majority of the world’s nations and its three major religions: Jerusalem, the Holy City.

That Spiritual Sodom and Egypt where our Lord was crucified (Rev.)

The world needs a non-political body alongside the United Nations, where the best minds of the nations would develop universal ethical norms that would be observed by all the governments and serve as basis for solving humanity’s major global problems.

This will be the son of Perdition, the Moshiach ben satan the False Christ they will "REVEAL" solution for the world. The World must be purged of satan's very last enemies, the saints who stand Firm in their testimony of Jesus the Christ, but they shall fail and they shall FALL and that son of perdition and his prophet and all them who have accepted him and his flesh kingdom which is no kingdom and his Mark shall be cast into outer Darkness.

Unlike the current U.N. framework, governments will not be represented at the Council. It will be comprised of the best minds of 12 world’s principal civilizations.

The council of TWELVE.......but of course

 It is the civilizations that, with their distinct cultures and religious philosophies, are the real players on the world stage, and conflicts between them are the most dangerous and destructive. In the Council they will be represented by individuals who carry moral and intellectual authority with their respective civilizations.

These individuals will be chosen through independent public opinion polls, rather than nominated by their governments. In Persian and Arab civilizations, where most regimes are non-democratic and expression of free will is nonexistent, Council members will be selected from among exiled dissidents.

Council members will not be accountable to their governments, nor be dependent on them, either financially or legally. They will be guided solely by their conscience and major universal ethic principles

The membership of the Council and its Executive Committee will be fully rotated on the annual basis. The Executive Committee will draft the agenda, and administer the Council’s sessions in Jerusalem. 

Then they will send the Letter into all the Judaeo-Churchinsanity little temples of zion to Abstain from Meet with Blood, From Worshipping Jesus the Christ.....etc..............

Council members in their respective civilizations will be selected by regional Jerusalem Summits. JS Asia, JS America, and JS Europe have already been created.

Council will not issue any binding resolutions. Rather, it will strive to gain moral authority, so that its recommendations, developed in the spirit of moral clarity and caring for future generations, eventually become guidelines for the world leaders.

Remember Bushkevik's statement to AIPAC regarding the new "Moral Clarity"

Principles of the Council of Civilizations


Gathering representatives of the civilizations (not governments) which are shaping the fate of humanity: superpowers and clusters of countries with common cultures.
Agreeing on the existence and definition of the common moral basis: the universal ethical laws.

the Talmudic Leaven of the Pharisee hasidim Chabad Lubavitch son's of satan's Shema-GOG

Searching solutions to the burning global problems on the basis of these values.

Three-fold actions:

1. Facilitate synergy of civilizations and search for morality-based solutions.
2. Propagate these solutions and advise governments to adopt them.
3.Advance Global Education to Universal Moral Values.

They will brainwash the Children to satan's religion to weed out the saints in Jesus the Lord

The Jerusalem Summit will invite the United Nations to recognize the Council of Civilizations as an official entity which will work alongside the United Nations (in the format of an official,independent body ( an upper “House” or the model of the British “House of Lords”) through procedures to be agreed upon.

The seat of the Council will be in Jerusalem with regional bureaus in each of the represented civilizations and a permanent bureau at U.N. Headquarters in New York.


Admission to the Council of Civilizations is subject to recognizing the following realities:

1. The spiritual laws that serve as common basis to all religions must also serve as basis for taking decisions in all the human activities. Most important of these laws are:

Consciousness defines Being


Human life is sacred


People have equal rights and freedoms

Under Jesus the Christ

Religions are diverse and all equally lead to God

Jesus is the Only Name in Which to enter into the Kingdom of heaven

satan ha Mashiach is the way to enter into eternal damnation of the flesh desire of their Hoodlum haha of murder on earth


Composition of the Council

Jerusalem has always served as a source for the universal concern for all the nations on earth. The Bible (Babylonian Babble) indictates that in addition to Israel, there are seventy ancient nations which are the roots of the diverse national groups and cultures which exist today and which are based on the number of descendants of Noah which are listed in the Book of Genesis, after the story of the great flood. Seventy names are recorded, and at the end of the section it states, ‘These are the families of Noah’s descendants, and from these nations were separated on on the earth after the flood” (Genesis 10:2). The Bible commands the people of Israel to bring seventy offerings on behalf of the seventy nations to the Temple on the Festival of Tabernacles to pray to the Almighty for continued life, sustenance and blessings for the seventy nations. 

Jesus the Christ is the ONLY Lamb ever needed for Salvation, the Promise

Representatives of the seventy nations were present in Jerusalem at the time at the presentation of these offerings. The seventy nations are the main players in the modern world. Today they are categorized as the major superpowers that represent separate civilizations. Other individual civilizations are represented by the clusters of countries, or regional groups. The major threat to the world peace comes from the clashes of these civilizations.

for the shem's are pitting the nations against Nations, but the END is not yet

For they have not delivered the sainst who Stand Firm to be afflicted and  slain in their freemason temples and their shemaGogs of satan. When the Last is slain then is the End, that Great and terrible day of the Lord's wrath.....and they are right, you know....No-Hide for they will cry for the rocks to fall upon them to Hide from the Wrath of the Lord

South America
North America
North-Western (Catholic-Protestant) Europe
South-Eastern (Orthodox) Europe
South-East Asia
Persian civilization
Arab civilization
Turkic (Turkey and Central Asia) civilization

The Council of Civilizations will be composed of representatives of these twelve civilizations and the host representative from Israel. 

13 the symbol to replicate the Twelve Diciples of Jesus the Christ and the twelve Tribes of israel

The Council of Civilizations will bring representatives of these diverse civilizations together in Jerusalem for the first time since Biblical times with the goal of creating unity through the translation of universal spiritual and moral laws into social structure and politics (“social engineering”).

The Council of Civilizations is not a Religious/Ecumenical forum and it is not a purely secular Academic/Political institute. It is a framework for the best and purest minds and hearts of the civilized world – to guide the world towards spiritual and moral renewal.

What the Council will actually DO?

- It will develop an efficient Alternative Model for decision making in world politics: Decision through Wisdom and Ethics not through political or military Force (Realpolitik).

By this Peace they shall slay wonderfully all who oppose their Order which came out of their Chaos which will Fall

- It will give practical recommendations on how to solve the most crucial global problems through applying integrating consciousness, reconciling competing geo-political, geo-economic and geo-cultural projects.

Collective Communitarian Noahide Demoni-crazy

A Forum of Spiritual and Lay Patrons representing the major faiths and professions is being formed toward the announcement of the development of the Council of Civilizations.



Now once again let us visit the "Forgery" of the so-called anti-Shem "Protocols of the learned Hasidic Chabad Lubavitch Elders of flesh zion of the Hoodlum hoo haha of haha satan"

Now the lazy brain dead may think this is totally repititious.....but what the heck a soul is a terrible thing to "Waste"

18. Our absolutism will in all things be logically consecutive and therefore in each one of its decrees our supreme will be respected and unquestionably fulfilled: it will ignore all murmurs, all discontents of every kind and will destroy to the root every kind of manifestation of them in act by punishment of an exemplary character.

19. We shall abolish the right of cessation, which will be transferred exclusively to our disposal - to the cognizance of him who rules, for we must not allow the conception among the people of a thought that there could be such a thing as a decision that is not right of judges set up by us. If, however, anything like this should occur, we shall ourselves cassate the decision, but inflict therewith such exemplary punishment on the judge for lack of understanding of his duty and the purpose of his appointment as will prevent a repetition of such cases .... I repeat that it must be born in mind that we shall know every step of our administration which only needs to be closely watched for the people to be content with us, for it has the right to demand from a good government a good official.

20. OUR GOVERNMENT WILL HAVE THE APPEARANCE OF A PATRIARCHAL PATERNAL GUARDIANSHIP ON THE PART OF OUR RULER. Our own nation and our subjects will discern in his person a father caring for their every need, their every act, their every inter-relation as subjects one with another, as well as their relations to the ruler. They will then be so thoroughly imbued with the thought that it is impossible for them to dispense with this wardship and guidance, if they wish to live in peace and quiet, THAT THEY WILL ACKNOWLEDGE THE AUTOCRACY OF OUR RULER WITH A DEVOTION BORDERING ON "APOTHEOSIS," especially when they are convinced that those whom we set up do not put their own in place of authority, but only blindly execute his dictates. They will be rejoiced that we have regulated everything in their lives as is done by wise parents who desire to train children in the cause of duty and submission. For the peoples of the world in regard to the secrets of our polity are ever through the ages only children under age, precisely as are also their governments.

21. As you see, I found our despotism on right and duty: the right to compel the execution of duty is the direct obligation of a government which is a father for its subjects. It has the right of the strong that it may use it for the benefit of directing humanity towards that order which is defined by nature, namely, submission. Everything in the world is in a state of submission, if not to man, then to circumstances or its own inner character, in all cases, to what is stronger. And so shall we be this something stronger for the sake of good.

22. We are obliged without hesitation to sacrifice individuals, who commit a breach of established order, for in the exemplary punishment of evil lies a great educational problem.

23. When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the world. The indispensable victims offered by him in consequence of their suitability will never reach the number of victims offered in the course of centuries by the mania of magnificence, the emulation between the GOY governments.

24. Our King will be in constant communion with the peoples, making to them from the tribune speeches which fame will in that same hour distribute over all the world.


Index .



2. We shall exclude from the course of instruction State Law as also all that concerns the political question. These subjects will be taught to a few dozen of persons chosen for their pre-eminent capacities from among the number of the initiated. THE UNIVERSITIES MUST NO LONGER SEND OUT FROM THEIR HALLS MILK SOPS CONCOCTING PLANS FOR A CONSTITUTION, LIKE A COMEDY OR A TRAGEDY, BUSYING THEMSELVES WITH QUESTIONS OF POLICY IN WHICH EVEN THEIR OWN FATHERS NEVER HAD ANY POWER OF THOUGHT.

3. The ill-guided acquaintance of a large number of persons with questions of polity creates utopian dreamers and bad subjects, as you can see for yourselves from the example of the universal education in this direction of the GOYIM. We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order. But when we are in power we shall remove every kind of disturbing subject from the course of education and shall make out of the youth obedient children of authority, loving him who rules as the support and hope of peace and quiet.


4. Classicism as also any form of study of ancient history, in which there are more bad than good examples, we shall replace with the study of the program of the future. We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the government of the GOYIM. The study of practical life, of the obligations of order, of the relations of people one to another, of avoiding bad and selfish examples, which spread the infection of evil, and similar questions of an educative nature, will stand in the forefront of the teaching program, which will be drawn up on a separate plan for each calling or state of life, in no wise generalizing the teaching. This treatment of the question has special importance.


6. In order that he who rules may be seated firmly in the hearts and minds of his subjects it is necessary for the time of his activity to instruct the whole nation in the schools and on the market places about this meaning and his acts and all his beneficent initiatives.

7. We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction. Learners of all ages have the right to assemble together with their parents in the educational establishments as it were in a club: during these assemblies, on holidays, teachers will read what will pass as free lectures on questions of human relations, of the laws of examples, of the philosophy of new theories not yet declared to the world. These theories will be raised by us to the stage of a dogma of faith as a traditional stage towards our faith. On the completion of this exposition of our program of action in the present and the future I will read you the principles of these theories.

8. In a word, knowing by the experience of many centuries that people live and are guided by ideas, that these ideas are imbibed by people only by the aid of education provided with equal success for all ages of growth, but of course by varying methods, we shall swallow up and confiscate to our own use the last scintilla of independence of thought, which we have for long past been directing towards subjects and ideas useful for us. The system of bridling thought is already at work in the so-called system of teaching by OBJECT LESSONS, the purpose of which is to turn the GOYIM into unthinking submissive brutes waiting for things to be presented before their eyes in order to form an idea of them .... In France, one of our best agents, Bourgeois, has already made public a new program of teaching by object lessons.


Index .


1. The practice of advocacy produces men cold, cruel, persistent, unprincipled, who in all cases take up an impersonal, purely legal standpoint. They have the inveterate habit to refer everything to its value for the defense and not to the public welfare of its results. They do not usually decline to undertake any defense whatever, they strive for an acquittal at all costs, caviling over every petty crux of jurisprudence and thereby they demoralize justice. For this reason we shall set this profession into narrow frames which will keep it inside this sphere of executive public service. Advocates, equally with judges, will be deprived of the right of communication with litigant; they well receive business only from the court and will study it by notes of report and documents, defending their clients after they have been interrogated in court on facts that have appeared. They will receive an honorarium without regard to the quality of the defense. This will render them mere reporters on law-business in the interests of justice and as counterpoise to the proctor who will be the reporter in the interests of prosecution; this will shorten business before the courts. In this way will be established a practice of honest unprejudiced defense conducted not from personal interest but by conviction. This will also, by the way, remove the present practice of corrupt bargain between advocation to agree only to let that side win which pays most .....


2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF "GOYIM," and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall act clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.

3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place.


5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM ....

6. In general, then, our contemporary press will continue to CONVICT State affairs, religions, incapacities of the GOYIM, always using the most unprincipled expressions in order by every means to lower their prestige in the manner which can only be practiced by the genius of our gifted tribe ....

7. Our kingdom will be an apologia of the divinity Vishnu, in whom is found its personification - in our hundred hands will be, one in each, the springs of the machinery of social life. We shall see everything without the aid of official police which, in that scope of its rights which we elaborated for the use of the GOYIM, hinders governments from seeing. In our programs ONE-THIRD OF OUR SUBJECTS WILL KEEP THE REST UNDER OBSERVATION from a sense of duty, on the principle of volunteer service to the State. It will then be no disgrace to be a spy and informer, but a merit: unfounded denunciations, however, will be cruelly punished that there may be development of abuses of this right.

8. Our agents will be taken from the higher as well as the lower ranks of society, from among the administrative class who spend their time in amusements, editors, printers and publishers, booksellers, clerks, and salesmen, workmen, coachmen, lackeys, et cetera. This body, having no rights and not being empowered to take any action on their own account, and consequently a police without any power, will only witness and report: verification of their reports and arrests will depend upon a responsible group of controllers of police affairs, while the actual act of arrest will be performed by the gendarmerie and the municipal police. Any person not denouncing anything seen or heard concerning questions of polity will also be charged with and made responsible for concealment, if it be proved that he is guilty of this crime.


10. Such an organization will extirpate abuses of authority, of force, of bribery, everything in fact which we by our counsels, by out theories of the superhuman rights of man, have introduced into the customs of the GOYIM .... But how else were we to procure that increase of causes predisposing to disorders in the midst of their administration? .... Among the number of those methods one of the most important is - agents for the restoration of order, so placed as to have the opportunity in their disintegrating activity of developing and displaying their evil inclinations - obstinate self-conceit, irresponsible exercise of authority, and, first and foremost, venality.


Index .


1. When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defense (the most fatal poison for the prestige of authority) we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the co- operation of good speakers. Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterances. This will give us the pretext for domiciliary prerequisitions and surveillance on the part of our servants from among the number of the GOYIM police ....

2. As the majority of conspirators act of love for the game, for the sake of talking, so, until they commit some overt act we shall not lay a finger on them but only introduce into their midst observation elements .... It must be remembered that the prestige of authority is lessened if it frequently discovers conspiracies against itself: this implies a presumption of consciousness of weakness, or, what is still worse, of injustice. You are aware that we have broken the prestige of the GOY kings by frequent attempts upon their lives through our agents, blind sheep of our flock, who are easily moved by a few liberal phrases to crimes provided only they be painted in political colors. WE HAVE COMPELLED THE RULERS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR WEAKNESS IN ADVERTISING OVERT MEASURES OF SECRETE DEFENSE AND THEREBY WE SHALL BRING THE PROMISE OF AUTHORITY TO DESTRUCTION.

3. Our ruler will be secretly protected only by the most insignificant guard, because we shall not admit so much as a thought that there could exist against him any sedition with which he is not strong enough to contend and is compelled to hide from it.

4. If we should admit this thought, as the GOYIM have done and are doing, we should IPSO FACTO be signing a death sentence, if not for our ruler, at any rate for his dynasty, at no distant date.


5. According to strictly enforced outward appearances our ruler will employ his power only for the advantage of the nation and in no wise for his own or dynastic profits. Therefore, with the observance of this decorum, his authority will be respected and guarded by the subjects themselves, it will receive an apotheosis in the admission that with it is bound up the well-being of every citizen of the State, for upon it will depend all order in the common life of the pack ....


7. Our ruler will always be among the people and be surrounded by a mob of apparently curious men and women, who will occupy the front ranks about him, to all appearance by chance, and will restrain the ranks of the rest out of respect as it will appear for good order. This will sow an example of restraint also in others. If a petitioner appears among the people trying to hand a petition and forcing his way through the ranks, the first ranks must receive the petition and before the eyes of the petitioner pass it to the ruler, so that all may know that what is handed in reaches its destination, that consequently, there exists a control of the ruler himself. The aureole of power requires for is existence that the people may be able to say: "If the king knew of this," or: "the king will hear it."

8. WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICIAL DEFENSE, THE MYSTICAL PRESTIGE OF AUTHORITY DISAPPEARS: given a certain audacity, and everyone counts himself master of it, the sedition- monger is conscious of his strength, and when occasion serves watches for the moment to make an attempt upon authority .... For the GOYIM we have been preaching something else, but by that very fact we are enabled to see what measures of overt defense have brought them to ....

9. CRIMINALS WITH US WILL BE ARRESTED AT THE FIRST, more or less, well-grounded SUSPICION: it cannot be allowed that out of fear of a possible mistake an opportunity should be given of escape to persons suspected of a political lapse of crime, for in these matters we shall be literally merciless. If it is still possible, by stretching a point, to admit a reconsideration of the motive causes in simple crimes, there is no possibility of excuse for persons occupying themselves with questions in which nobody except the government can understand anything .... And it is not all governments that understand true policy.


Index .


1. If we do not permit any independent dabbling in the political we shall on the other hand encourage every kind of report or petition with proposals for the government to examine into all kinds of projects for the amelioration of the condition of the people; this will reveal to us the defects or else the fantasies of our subjects, to which we shall respond either by accomplishing them or by a wise rebuttment to prove the shortsightedness of one who judges wrongly.

2. Sedition-mongering is nothing more than the yapping of a lap- dog at an elephant. For a government well organized, not from the police but from the public point of view, the lap-dog yaps at the elephant in entire unconsciousness of its strength and importance. It needs no more than to take a good example to show the relative importance of both and the lap-dogs will cease to yap and will wag their tails the moment they set eyes on an elephant.

3. In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse in its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.

4. We have done our best, and I hope we have succeeded to obtain that the GOYIM should not arrive at this means of contending with sedition. It was for this reason that through the Press and in speeches, indirectly - in cleverly compiled school- books on history, we have advertised the martyrdom alleged to have been accredited by sedition-mongers for the idea of the commonweal. This advertisement has increased the contingent of liberals and has brought thousands of GOYIM into the ranks of our livestock cattle.


Index .


1. To-day we shall touch upon the financial program, which I put off to the end of my report as being the most difficult, the crowning and the decisive point of our plans. Before entering upon it I will remind you that I have already spoken before by way of a hint when I said that the sum total of our actions is settled by the question of figures.

2. When we come into our kingdom our autocratic government will avoid, from a principle of self-preservation, sensibly burdening the masses of the people with taxes, remembering that it plays the part of father and protector. But as State organization cost dear it is necessary nevertheless to obtain the funds required for it. It will, therefore, elaborate with particular precaution the question of equilibrium in this matter.

3. Our rule, in which the king will enjoy the legal fiction that everything in his State belongs to him (which may easily be translated into fact), will be enabled to resort to the lawful confiscation of all sums of every kind for the regulation of their circulation in the State. From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property. In this manner the dues will be paid without straitening or ruining anybody in the form of a percentage of the amount of property. The rich must be aware that it is their duty to place a part of their superfluities at the disposal of the State since the State guarantees them security of possession of the rest of their property and the right of honest gains, I say honest, for the control over property will do away with robbery on a legal basis.

4. This social reform must come from above, for the time is ripe for it - it is indispensable as a pledge of peace.


5. The tax upon the poor man is a seed of revolution and works to the detriment of the State which is hunting after the trifling is missing the big. Quite apart from this, a tax on capitalists diminishes the growth of wealth in private hands in which we have in these days concentrated it as a counterpoise to the government strength of the GOYIM - their State finances.

6. A tax increasing in a percentage ratio to capital will give much larger revenue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the GOYIM. (Now we know the purpose of the 16th Amendment!!).

7. The force upon which our king will rest consists in the equilibrium and the guarantee of peace, for the sake of which things it is indispensable that the capitalists should yield up a portion of their incomes for the sake of the secure working of the machinery of the State. State needs must be paid by those who will not feel the burden and have enough to take from.

8. Such a measure will destroy the hatred of the poor man for the rich, in whom he will see a necessary financial support for the State, will see in him the organizer of peace and well-being since he will see that it is the rich man who is paying the necessary means to attain these things.

9. In order that payers of the educated classes should not too much distress themselves over the new payments they will have full accounts given them of the destination of those payments, with the exception of such sums as will be appropriated for the needs of the throne and the administrative institutions.

10. He who reigns will not have any properties of his own once all in the State represented his patrimony, or else the one would be in contradiction to the other; the fact of holding private means would destroy the right of property in the common possessions of all.

11. Relatives of him who reigns, his heirs excepted, who will be maintained by the resources of the State, must enter the ranks of servants of the State or must work to obtain the right to property; the privilege of royal blood must not serve for the spoiling of the treasury.

12. Purchase, receipt of money or inheritance will be subject to the payment of a stamp progressive tax. Any transfer of property, whether money or other, without evidence of payment of this tax which will be strictly registered by names, will render the former holder liable to pay interest on the tax from the moment of transfer of these sums up to the discovery of his evasion of declaration of the transfer. Transfer documents must be presented weekly at the local treasury office with notifications of the name, surname and permanent place of residence of the former and the new holder of the property. This transfer with register of names must begin from a definite sum which exceeds the ordinary expenses of buying and selling necessaries, and these will be subject to payment only by a stamp impost of a definite percentage of the unit.

13. Just strike an estimate of how many times such taxes as these will cover the revenue of the GOYIM States.


14. The State exchequer will have to maintain a definite complement of reserve sums, and all that is collected above that complement must be returned into circulation. On these sums will be organized public works. The initiative in works of this kind, proceeding from State sources, will blind the working class firmly to the interests of the State and to those who reign. From these same sums also a part will be set aside as rewards of inventiveness and productiveness.

15. On no account should so much as a single unit above the definite and freely estimated sums be retained in the State Treasuries, for money exists to be circulated and any kind of stagnation of money acts ruinously on the running of the State machinery, for which it is the lubricant; a stagnation of the lubricant may stop the regular working of the mechanism.

16. The substitution of interest-bearing paper for a part of the token of exchange has produced exactly this stagnation. The consequences of this circumstance are already sufficiently noticeable.

17. A court of account will also be instituted by us, and in it the ruler will find at any moment a full accounting for State income and expenditure, with the exception of the current monthly account, not yet made up, and that of the preceding month, which will not yet have been delivered.

18. The one and only person who will have no interest in robbing the State is its owner, the ruler. This is why his personal control will remove the possibility of leakages of extravagances.

19. The representative function of the ruler at receptions for the sake of etiquette, which absorbs so much invaluable time, will be abolished in order that the ruler may have time for control and consideration. His power will not then be split up into fractional parts among time-serving favorites who surround the throne for its pomp and splendor, and are interested only in their own and not in the common interests of the State.

20. Economic crises have been producer by us for the GOYIM by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge capitals have stagnated, withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same stagnant capitals for loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of these capitals .... The concentration of industry in the hands of capitalists out of the hands of small masters has drained away all the juices of the peoples and with them also the States .... (Now we know the purpose of the Federal Reserve Bank Corporation!!).

21. The present issue of money in general does not correspond with the requirements per head, and cannot therefore satisfy all the needs of the workers. The issue of money ought to correspond with the growth of population and thereby children also must absolutely be reckoned as consumers of currency from the day of their birth. The revision of issue is a material question for the whole world.



23. With us the standard that must be introduced is the cost of working-man power, whether it be reckoned in paper or in wood. We shall make the issue of money in accordance with the normal requirements of each subject, adding to the quantity with every birth and subtracting with every death.

24. The accounts will be managed by each department (the French administrative division), each circle.

25. In order that there may be no delays in the paying our of money for State needs the sums and terms of such payments will be fixed by decree of the ruler; this will do away with the protection by a ministry of one institution to the detriment of others.

26. The budgets of income and expenditure will be carried out side by side that they may not be obscured by distance one to another.

27. The reforms projected by us in the financial institutions and principles of the GOYIM will be clothed by us in such forms as will alarm nobody. We shall point out the necessity of reforms in consequence of the disorderly darkness into which the GOYIM by their irregularities have plunged the finances. The first irregularity, as we shall point out, consists in their beginning with drawing up a single budget which year after year grows owing to the following cause: this budget is dragged out to half the year, then they demand a budget to put things right, and this they expend in three months, after which they ask for a supplementary budget, and all this ends with a liquidation budget. But, as the budget of the following year is drawn up in accordance with the sum of the total addition, the annual departure from the normal reaches as much as 50 per cent in a year, and so the annual budget is trebled in ten years. Thanks to such methods, allowed by the carelessness of the GOY States, their treasuries are empty. The period of loans supervenes, and that has swallowed up remainders and brought all the GOY States to bankruptcy. (The United States was declared "bankrupt" at the Geneva Convention of 1929! [see 31 USC 5112, 5118, and 5119).

28. You understand perfectly that economic arrangements of this kind, which have been suggested to the GOYIM by us, cannot be carried on by us.

29. Every kind of loan proves infirmity in the State and a want of understanding of the rights of the State. Loans hang like a sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers, who, instead of taking from their subjects by a temporary tax, come begging with outstretched palm of our bankers. Foreign loans are leeches which there is no possibility of removing from the body of the State until they fall off of themselves or the State flings them off. But the GOY States do not tear them off; they go on in persisting in putting more on to themselves so that they must inevitably perish, drained by voluntary blood-letting.


30. What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is - an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty - treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.

31. From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealth foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.

32. So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects.

33. If the superficiality of GOY kings on their thrones in regard to State affairs and the venality of ministers or the want of understanding of financial matters on the part of other ruling persons have made their countries debtors to our treasuries to amounts quite impossible to pay it has not been accomplished without, on our part, heavy expenditure of trouble and money.

34. Stagnation of money will not be allowed by us and therefore there will be no State interest-bearing paper, except a one per- cent series, so that there will be no payment of interest to leeches that suck all the strength out of the State. The right to issue interest-bearing paper will be given exclusively to industrial companies who will find no difficulty in paying interest out of profits, whereas the State does not make interest on borrowed money like these companies, for the State borrows to spend and not to use in operations. (Now we know why President Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 when he refused to borrow any more of the "Bank Notes" from the bankers of the Federal Reserve Bank and began circulating non-interest bearing "Notes" of the "United States of America"!!!).

35. Industrial papers will be bought also by the government which from being as now a paper of tribute by loan operations will be transformed into a lender of money at a profit. This measure will stop the stagnation of money, parasitic profits and idleness, all of which were useful for us among the GOYIM so long as they were independent but are not desirable under our rule.

36. How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the GOYIM, as expressed in the fact that they have been borrowing from us with payment of interest without ever thinking that all the same these very moneys plus an addition for payment of interest must be got by them from their own State pockets in order to settle up with us. What could have been simpler than to take the money they wanted from their own people?

37. But it is a proof of the genius of our chosen mind that we have contrived to present the matter of loans to them in such a light that they have even seen in them an advantage for themselves.

38. Our accounts, which we shall present when the time comes, in the light of centuries of experience gained by experiments made by us on the GOY States, will be distinguished by clearness and definiteness and will show at a glance to all men the advantage of our innovations. They will put an end to those abuses to which we owe our mastery over the GOYIM, but which cannot be allowed in our kingdom.

39. We shall so hedge about our system of accounting that neither the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant will be in a position to divert even the smallest sum from its destination without detection or to direct it in another direction except that which will be once fixed in a definite plan of action. (Is this why a "private corporation," known as the "Internal Revenue Service," is in charge of collecting the "payments" of the "Income Taxes" and the IRS always deposits those "payments" to the Federal Reserve bank and never to the Treasury of the United States??).

40. And without a definite plan it is impossible to rule. Marching along an undetermined road and with undetermined resources brings to ruin by the way heroes and demi-gods.

41. The GOY rulers, whom we once upon a time advised should be distracted from State occupations by representative receptions, observances of etiquette, entertainments, were only screens for our rule. The accounts of favorite courtiers who replaced them in the sphere of affairs were drawn up for them by our agents, and every time gave satisfaction to short-sighted minds by promises that in the future economics and improvements were foreseen .... Economics from what? From new taxes? - were questions that might have been but were not asked by those who read our accounts and projects.

42. You know to what they have been brought by this carelessness, to what pitch of financial disorder they have arrived, notwithstanding the astonishing industry of their peoples ....


Index .


1. To what I reported to you at the last meeting I shall now add a detailed explanation of internal loans. Of foreign loans I shall say nothing more, because they have fed us with national moneys of the GOYIM, but for our State there will be no foreigners, that is, nothing external.

2. We have taken advantage of the venality of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over, by lending to the GOY governments moneys which were not at all needed by the States. Could anyone do the like in regard to us? .... Therefore, I shall only deal with the details of internal loans.

3. States announce that such a loan is to be concluded and open subscriptions for their own bills of exchange, that is, for their interest-bearing paper. That they may be within the reach of all the price is determined at from a hundred to a thousand; and a discount is made for the earliest subscribers. Next day by artificial means the price of them goes up, the alleged reason being that everyone is rushing to buy them. In a few days the treasury safes are as they say overflowing and there's more money than they can do with (why then take it?). The subscription, it is alleged, covers many times over the issue total of the loan; in this lies the whole stage effect - look you, they say, what confidence is shown in the government's bills of exchange.

4. But when the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, BUT ONLY THE INTEREST ON IT. 

5. Later comes the time for conversions, but they diminish the payment of interest without covering the debt, and besides they cannot be made without the consent of the lenders; on announcing a conversion a proposal is made to return the money to those who are not willing to convert their paper. If everybody expressed his unwillingness and demanded his money back, the government would be hooked on their own files and would be found insolvent and unable to pay the proposed sums. By good luck the subjects of the GOY governments, knowing nothing about financial affairs, have always preferred losses on exchange and diminution of interest to the risk of new investments of their moneys, and have thereby many a time enabled these governments to throw off their shoulders a debit of several millions.

6. Nowadays, with external loans, these tricks cannot be played by the GOYIM for they know that we shall demand all our moneys back.

7. In this way in acknowledged bankruptcy will best prove to the various countries the absence of any means between the interest of the peoples and of those who rule them.

8. I beg you to concentrate your particular attention upon this point and upon the following: nowadays all internal loans are consolidated by so-called flying loans, that is, such as have terms of payment more or less near. These debts consist of moneys paid into the savings banks and reserve funds. If left for long at the disposition of a government these funds evaporate in the payment of interest on foreign loans, and are placed by the deposit of equivalent amount of RENTS.

9. And these last it is which patch up all the leaks in the State treasuries of the GOYIM.

10. When we ascend the throne of the world all these financial and similar shifts, as being not in accord with our interests, will be swept away so as not to leave a trace, as also will be destroyed all money markets, since we shall not allow the prestige of our power to be shaken by fluctuations of prices set upon our values, which we shall announce by law at the price which represents their full worth without any possibility of lowering or raising. (Raising gives the pretext for lowering, which indeed was where we made a beginning in relation to the values of the GOYIM.)

11. We shall replace the money markets by grandiose government credit institutions, the object of which will be to fix the price of industrial values in accordance with government views. These institutions will be in a position to fling upon the market five hundred millions of industrial paper in one day, or to buy up for the same amount. In this way all industrial undertakings will come into dependence upon us. You may imagine for yourselves what immense power we shall thereby secure for ourselves ....


Index .


1 In all that has so far been reported by me to you, I have endeavored to depict with care the secret of what is coming, of what is past, and of what is going on now, rushing into the flood of the great events coming already in the near future, the secret of our relations to the GOYIM and of financial operations. On this subject there remains still a little for me to add.


3. Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true well- being - the bringing of everything into order? Though it be even by the exercise of some violence, yet all the same it will be established. We shall contrive to prove that we are benefactors who have restored to the rent and mangled earth the true good and also freedom of the person, and therewith we shall enable it to be enjoyed in peace and quiet, with proper dignity of relations, on the condition, of course, of strict observance of the laws established by us. We shall make plain therewith that freedom does not consist in dissipation and in the right of unbridled license any more than the dignity and force of a man do not consist in the right of everyone to promulgate destructive principles in the nature of freedom of conscience, equality and a like, that freedom of the person in no wise consists in the right to agitate oneself and others by abominable speeches before disorderly mobs, and that true freedom consists in the inviolability of the person who honorably and strictly observes all the laws of life in common, that human dignity is wrapped up in consciousness of the rights and also of the absence of rights of each, and not wholly and solely in fantastic imaginings about the subject of one's EGO.

4. One authority will be glorious because it will be all-powerful, will rule and guide, and not muddle along after leaders and orators shrieking themselves hoarse with senseless words which they call great principles and which are noting else, to speak honestly, but utopian .... Our authority will be the crown of order, and in that is included the whole happiness of man. The aureole of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee before it and a reverent fear before it of all the peoples. True force makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God: none dare come near to it so as to take so much as a span from it away.


Index .


1. That the peoples may become accustomed to obedience it is necessary to inculcate lessons of humility and therefore to reduce the production of articles of luxury. By this we shall improve morals which have been debased by emulation in the sphere of luxury. We shall re-establish small master production which will mean laying a mine under the private capital of manufactures. This is indispensable also for the reason that manufacturers on the grand scale often move, though not always consciously, the thoughts of the masses in directions against the government. A people of small masters knows nothing of unemployment and this binds him closely with existing order, and consequently with the firmness of authority. For us its part will have been played out the moment authority is transferred into our hands. Drunkenness also will be prohibited by law and punishable as a crime against humanness of man who is turned into a brute under the influence of alcohol.

2. Subjects, I repeat once more, give blind obedience only to the strong hand which is absolutely independent of them, for in it they feel the sword of defense and support against social scourges .... What do they want with an angelic spirit in a king? What they have to see in him is the personification of force and power.

3. The supreme lord who will replace all now existing ruler, dragging in their existence among societies demoralized by us, societies that have denied even the authority of God, from whose midst breads out on all sides the fire of anarchy, must first of all proceed to quench this all-devouring flame. Therefore he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies, though he should drench them with his own blood, that he may resurrect them again in the form of regularly organized troops fighting consciously with every kind of infection that may cover the body of the State with sores.

4. This Chosen One of God is chosen from above to demolish the senseless forces moved by instinct and not reason, by brutishness and humanness. These forces now triumph in manifestations of robbery and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and rights. They have overthrown all forms of social order to erect on the ruins of the throne of the King of the Jews; but their part will be played out the moment he enters into his kingdom. Then it will be necessary to sweep them away from his path, on which must be left no knot, no splinter.

5. Then will it be possible for us to say to the peoples of the world: Give thanks to God and bow the knee before him who bears on his front the seal of the predestination of man, to which God himself has led his star that none other but Him might free us from all the before-mentioned forces and evils.


Index .


1. I pass now to the method of confirming the dynastic roots of King David to the last strata of the earth.

2. This confirmation will first and foremost be included in that which to this day has rested the force of conservatism by our learned elders of the conduct of the affairs of the world, in the directing of the education of thought of all humanity.

3. Certain members of the seed of David will prepare the kings and their heirs, selecting not by right of heritage but by eminent capacities, inducting them into the most secret mysteries of the political, into schemes of government, but providing always that none may come to knowledge of the secrets. The object of this mode of action is that all may know that government cannot be entrusted to those who have not been inducted into the secret places of its art ....

4. To these persons only will be taught the practical application of the aforenamed plans by comparison of the experiences of many centuries, all the observations on the politico-economic moves and social sciences - in a word, all the spirit of laws which have been unshakably established by nature herself for the regulation of the relations of humanity.

5. Direct heirs will often be set aside from ascending the throne if in their time of training they exhibit frivolity, softness and other qualities that are the ruin of authority, which render them incapable of governing and in themselves dangerous for kingly office.

6. Only those who are unconditionally capable for firm, even if it be to cruelty, direct rule will receive the reins of rule from our learned elders.

7. In case of falling sick with weakness of will or other form of incapacity. kings must by law hand over the reins of rule to new and capable hands.

8. The king's plan of action for the current moment, and all the more so for the future, will be unknown, even to those who are called his closest counselors.


9. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming.

10. In the person of the king who with unbending will is master of himself and of humanity all will discern as it were fate with its mysterious ways. None will know what the king wishes to attain by his dispositions, and therefore none will dare to stand across an unknown path.

11. It is understood that the brain reservoir of the king must correspond in capacity to the plan of government it has to contain. It is for this reason that he will ascend the throne not otherwise than after examination of his mind by the aforesaid learned elders.

12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.

13. This terror was indispensable for us till the time comes for both these forces separately to fall under our influence.

14. The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts to the worst and most brutal side of human activity.

15. The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations.

16. Our supreme lord must be of an exemplary irreproachable.

December 3, 2004

Jerusalem Diaries

Israel's former Ambassador to the United Nations, Dr. Dore Gold, feels that the UN undermines international peace and security. Internationally renowned expert on terror financing, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, accuses the UN of corruption and financing terrorism. Baroness Caroline Cox, Deputy Speaker of the British House of Lords is deeply concerned about the UN's failure in the Darfur region of Sudan.

All three aired their views at the second annual Jerusalem Summit whose stated goal is to develop a Council of Civilizations, intended to serve as a practical alternative to the UN.

The Talmudic Supra Bogey Government of Noahide enforcement

The three-day gathering was sponsored by the Michael Chernoy Foundation, a Tel Aviv based entity financed by aluminum mogul Chernoy who also directs a large portion of his money to assisting victims of terror and assisting new immigrants from the former Soviet Union.

Representatives of twelve civilizations were brought to Jerusalem by the Chernoy Foundation to form the nucleus of the Council of Civilizations.

Yesterday the Bank of Israel authorised the Rothshild Bank Group to enter the information rooms of the Discount Bank. The group consists of Jewish businessmen from Europe, including the Reuben Brothers, who made most of their fortune during the post-privatisation period in Russia, in an aluminium business with Lev Chernoy, a brother of Michael


They included Luis Lacalle Herrera,

Diamonds of the Rebbe

By:Staiman / Mordechai
A book about Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Rebbe to millions, and his enduring effect on 28 men and women of all faiths. The list includes Comedian Jackie Mason; Orthodox Rabbi Aharon Soloveitchik; U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman; Israel Pop-Folk Singer Ruthi Navon; Down syndrome Specialist Dr. Rabbi Eliezer Goldstock; NYC former Mayoral Assistant Sid Davidoff; Magnetohydrodynamics Professor Herman Branover; Jewish Newspaper Publisher Herb Brin' Gossip Columnist Cindy Adams and Comedian Joey Adams; Industrialist David T. Chase; Literary Critic Leslie Fiedler; Wall Street Whiz Kid Steve Eisenberg; Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori; Black Peacemaker Richard Green; Young Israel Rabbi Herbert Bomzer; Musicologist Professor Kalman Cowl; Ophthalmologist Albert Hornblass; Former Uruguayan President
Luis Alberto Lacalle Herrera; New York Daily News Columnist Sidney Zion; Real Estate Agent Charles Roth; Reform Rabbi Herbert Weiner; Cancer Specialist Emanuel Revici;! Jewish Activist Mel Landow; Israeli Activist/Author Susan Roth; Wddding Photographer Meyer Rich; Political Scientist Hans J. Morgenthau; Music Composer Phillip Namanworth; and You-- there will never be another diamond like you!


 former president of Uruguay; Rep. Bob Beauprez (R-CO);




 Ana Palacio, former Foreign Minister of Spain; General Mansour Abu Rashid from Jordan; Rev. Dr. Kenneth Meshoe, a South African Member of Parliament and a host of prominent American media figures including talk show hosts John Batchelor and Dennis Prager and National Review editor David Pryce-Jones.

According to Jerusalem Summit director, Dmitry Radyshevsky, the Council's focus will be to "provide a venue for constructive engagement built on universal ethical principles."

Radyshevsky believes that Jerusalem is the logical place for the Council "since it's the only place that commands the respect and awe of the majority of the world's nations and its three major religions."

"We hope to restore Jerusalem's status not only as a religious but as an intellectual center of the world," he added.

Jer:6:14: They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

Summit academic director, Dr. Martin Sherman, professor of Political Science at Tel Aviv University, presented the most controversial idea of the conference.

Presenting the results of a poll commissioned by the Jerusalem Summit but carried out by the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion, Sherman told the audience that 70 percent of Arabs surveyed said that they would emigrate if they were offered one or more material inducements. A guarantee of a good job abroad, high standard housing or substantial financial compensation were specified.

Additionally, 42 percent of those polled said they have considered emigrating permanently.The survey of 528 adult interviewees was conducted between 15-21 November, 2004 in the West Bank and carries a statistical margin of error of 4.5 percent.

Sherman used the data to justify his thesis that political solutions to the Arab-Israeli conflict have brought only suffering to both populations. Sherman called for a redefinition of the Palestinian predicament in humanitarian rather than political terms.

In a 20 page booklet printed and distributed by the Jerusalem Summit, Sherman argues that the humanitarian solution is to help Palestinians achieve a better life by offering financial incentives to realize voluntary relocation in Arab countries.

"The Palestinians arriving at their gates will not be impoverished refugees, but relatively prosperous individuals with saving the equivalent of decades of GNP per capita in their pockets," he writes.

Sherman predicts that for every hundred Palestinians a country absorbs, the economy could count on an influx of around 10-15 million dollars into the private sector.

The basis of Sherman's proposal rests on abandoning the approach of relating to the Palestinians as a collective entity, and substituting a view of them as "tragedy-stricken individuals" to address "the enduring Palestinian humanitarian predicament," he urges.

The proposal, unlikely to get an airing at the UN, Radyshevsky acknowledges, would likely be number one item on the agenda of the Council of Civilizations.