September 11, 2008, 2:14pm
By Brett Lieberman
Will a rabbi’s blessing help Barack Obama?
What about 300 rabbis? And will the IRS
find this arrangement kosher?
“Rather than sit and yell at my television, I thought there was an
opportunity to do something,” said Rabbi
Steven Bob of Congregation Etz Chaim in Lombard, Ill, in the western suburbs of
Rabbis for Obama,
a grassroots group of 368 rabbis as of Thursday, Sept. 11, from Reform,
Conservative, Orthodox and Reconstructionist synagogues across the country who
hope that by lending their support to the Democratic nominee they can persuade
other Jews to back him too, is the brainchild of Bob and Rabbi
Sam Gordon of Sukkat Shalom in Wilmette, Ill.
The push, which they say is independent of their synagogues [“I’m not
using any of the platforms provided me by the synagogue, neither the bulletin or
the bima. This is me doing this personally,” Bob said], is believed to be the
largest organized effort by Jewish leaders to support one candidate or
presidential ticket. Rabbis have taken out newspaper ads and spoken for or
against candidates, but Jewish historians cannot recall a comparable effort.
Their synagogues are not endorsing a candidate, which could lead to the IRS
revoking their non-profit status. In announcing their support, Rabbis for Obama
announced only the rabbis’ names and hometowns – without their synagogues -
to avoid the implication that the synagogues are backing Obama.
What clergy can or can’t say to the congregations about the candidates or
issues was a topic raised during a panel discussion at the Democratic National
Convention in Denver last month. Several experts on the law said that clergy can
discuss issues and the campaigns from the pulpit, but warned they need to be
careful not to indicate their support for a particular candidate.
Prominent rabbis in the group include Rabbi
Elliot Dorf of Los Angeles, Rabbi
Jack Moline of Alexandria, Va, who spoke at the Democratic National Convention, Rabbi
Burton Visotzky of New York, Rabbi
Janet Marder of Palo Alto, Calif., and Rabbi
Ellen Weinberg Dreyfus of Homewood, Ill.
The rabbis felt moved to take an active role in the presidential campaign
because of what they saw as a unique opportunity to influence the outcome of an
election in which Jewish voters are receiving more attention than they can
recall in any recent election.
Believing that Obama
and Republican John McCain are equally “pro-Israel,” it was domestic issues
such as abortion, separation of church and state that were “gigantic issues”
that factored into their decision to publicly support Obama,
according to Bob.
“If the question is Israel, I think it’s evidently clear that the
differences on the two are very, very small,” Bob said.
Rabbis for Obama
members as of Sept. 11, 2008:
Chair: Rabbi Sam
Gordon, Wilmette, IL
Co-chair: Rabbi Steven
Bob, Glen Ellyn, IL
Vice- Chairs: Rabbi
Rachel Cowan, New York, NY Rabbi
Elliot Dorff, Los Angeles, CA
Rabbi Ellen Weinberg
Dreyfus, Homewood, IL
Rabbi Steve Foster,
Denver, CO Rabbi
Dayle Friedman, Philadelphia, PA
Rabbi Laura Geller, Los
Angeles, CA Rabbi Don
Gluckman, Pikesville, MD Rabbi
Nancy Fuchs Kreimer, Wyncote, PA
Rabbi Charles Kroloff,
Westfield, NJ Rabbi
Richard N. Levy, Encino, CA
Rabbi Brian Lurie, San
Rabbi Rachel Mikva, Rye
Brook, NY Rabbi Jack
Moline, Alexandria, VA
Rabbi Charles Simon, New
York, NY Rabbi
David Teutsch, Philadelphia, PA Rabbi
Ethan Tucker, New York, NY Rabbi
Burt Visotzky, New York, NY
Members: Rabbi Jonathan
Aaron, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi
Bruce Abrams, Cleveland Heights, OH Rabbi
David Adelson, New York, NY Rabbi
Adam M. Allenberg, Mountain View, CA Rabbi
Victor Appell, New York, NY
Rabbi Stephen A. Arnold,
S. Easton, MA Rabbi
Aryeh Azriel, Omaha, NE
Rabbi Larry Bach, El
Rabbi Andy Bachman,
Brooklyn, NY Rabbi
Chava Bahle, Suttons Bay, MI
Rabbi Andrew Baker,
Washington, D.C. Rabbi
Michael Barenbaum, Marin, CA
Rabbi Benjy Bar-Lev,
Cincinnati, OH Rabbi
Lewis Barth, Encino, CA Rabbi
Morris Barzilai, New Rochelle, NY Rabbi
Elliot Baskin, Greenwood Village, CO Rabbi
Renee Bauer, Madison WI Rabbi
Pamela Frydman Baugh, San Francisco, CA Rabbi
Leonard I. Beerman, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi
Annie Belford, St. Louis, MO Rabbi
Karen Bender, Tarzana, CA
Rabbi Donald R. Berlin,
St. Michaels, MD
Rabbi Linda Bertenthal,
Los Angeles, CA
Rabbi Marjorie Berman,
Philadelphia PA Rabbi
Phyllis Berman Philadelphia, PA Rabbi
Jonathan Biatch, Madison, WI Rabbi
Michael Birnholz, Vero Beach, FL
Rabbi Aaron B. Bisno,
Pittsburgh, PA Rabbi
Joshua Boettiger , Bennington, VA
Rabbi Terry Bookman,
Rabbi Jill Borodin,
Seattle, WA Rabbi
Mark Borovitz, Los Angeles, CA
Rabbi Neal Borovitz River
Edge, NJ Rabbi Sara
Brandes, Los Angeles, CA
Rabbi Herbert Bronstein,
Glencoe, IL Rabbi
Lester Bronstein, White Plains, NY Rabbi
Angela Buchdahl, New York, NY Rabbi
Gustav Buchdahl, Baltimore, MD Rabbi
Caryn Broitman, W. Tisbury, MA
Rabbi Daniel M. Bronstein,
Rabbi Carol Caine
Berkeley, CA Rabbi Debra
S. Cantor Newington, CT Rabbi
Carie Carter, Brooklyn, NY
Rabbi Kenneth Chasen, Los
Angeles, CA Rabbi
Steven Chester, Oakland, CA Rabbi
Diane Cohen, Los Angeles
Rabbi Hillel Cohn, San
Rabbi David J. Cooper,
Rabbi Julian I. Cook,
Denver, CO Rabbi
Mychal Copeland, Stanford, CA Rabbi
Laurie Coskey, Poway, CA
Rabbi Rachel Cowan, New
York, NY Rabbi Meryl M.
Crean, Media, PA
Rabbi Menachem Creditor,
Rabbi William Cutter, Los
Angeles, CO Rabbi
Eric Cytryn, Harrisburg, PA
Rabbi Harry K Danziger,
Germantown, TN Rabbi
Andrew Davids, Croton On Hudson, NY Rabbi
Stanley Davids, Santa Monica, CA Rabbi
Jerome Davidson, Kings Point, NY Rabbi
Eliezer Diamond, Teaneck, NJ Rabbi
Fred Dobb, Bethesda, MD Rabbi
Wayne Dosick, San Diego, CA Rabbi
William Dreskin, Greenburgh, NY
Rabbi Renee Edelman,
South Orange, NJ Rabbi
Amy Eilberg St. Paul, MN
Rabbi Bruce Elder,
Highland Park, IL Rabbi
Sue Levi Elwell, Philadelphia, PA
Rabbi Shira Koch Epstein,
Rabbi Daniel Fellman,
East Brunswick, NJ Rabbi
Brian Field, Denver CO
Rabbi Daniel Fink, Boise,
Reuven Firestone, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi
Adam D. Fisher, Stony Brook, NY Rabbi
Alan Flam, Barrington, RI
Rabbi Nancy Flam,
Northampton, MA Rabbi
Ellen Flax, New York, NY Rabbi
Robert Frazin, Hollywood, FL
Rabbi Michael Friedland,
South Bend. IN
Rabbi Joan S. Friedman,
Rabbi Marsha Friedman,
Elkins Park, PA
Rabbi Ronne Friedman,
Rabbi Stacy Friedman, San
Rafael, CA Rabbi
Randy Fleisher St. Louis, MO Rabbi
Serena Fujita, Lewisburg, PA
Rabbi Jack S. Gabriel,
Sonoma, CA Rabbi
Ruth Gais Summit, NJ
Rabbi Hillel Gamoran,
Seattle, WA Rabbi
Robert T. Gan, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi
Rachel Gartner, Montclair, NJ. Rabbi
Ruth Gelfarb, New York, NY Rabbi
Jonathan Gerard, Easton, PA Rabbi
Kim Geringer, Short Hills, New Jersey
Rabbi Gary Gerson, Oak
Rabbi Gordon Gladstone,
Bayonne NJ Rabbi
Miriyam Glazer, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi
Steve Glazer, Herndon, VA
Rabbi Mark Glickman,
Woodinville, WA Rabbi
Arnie Gluck, Skillman, NJ
Rabbi Shai Gluskin,
Rabbi Rosalind Gold,
Rabbi Gerald A. Goldman,
Holyoke, MA Rabbi James
Stone Goodman, St. Louis, MO
Rabbi Joseph Goldman,
Denver, CO Rabbi Andrea
Goldstein, St Louis, MO Rabbi
Jerrold Goldstein, Sherman Oaks, CA Rabbi
Jeffrey W. Goldwasser, Williamstown, MA Rabbi
Linda Henry Goodman, Garden City, NY Rabbi
Stephen Goodman, Garden City, NY
Rabbi Donald Goor,
Tarzana, CA Rabbi Seth
William Goren, Washington, DC Rabbi
Joshua Levine Grater, Pasadena, CA
Rabbi Alan Greenbaum,
Grass Valley, CA Rabbi C.
Michelle Greenberg, Northfield, IL Rabbi
David Greenspoon, Baltimore, MD
Rabbi Suzanne Griffel,
Chicago, IL Rabbi
Daniel Gropper, Rye, NY Rabbi
Arthur Gross-Schaefer, Santa Barbara, CA
Rabbi Susan Grossman,
Columbia, MD Rabbi
Joshua Gutoff, Brooklyn, NY
Rabbi Debra Hachen,
Demarest, NJ Rabbi
Shoshana Hantman, Katonah, NY
Rabbi Maurice Harris,
Eugene, OR Rabbi
Robert Harris, White Plains, NY Rabbi
Alan Henkin, Northridge, CA Rabbi
Jeffrey Hoffman, White
Plains, NY Rabbi Elliot
Holin, Elkins Park, PA Rabbi
Lauren Holtzblatt, New Haven, CT Rabbi
Linda Holtzman, Philadelphia, PA Rabbi
Margaret Holub, Mendecino, CA
Rabbi Abie Ingber,
Rabbi Steven B. Jacobs,
Woodland Hills, CA Rabbi
Devorah Jacobson, Amherst, MA Rabbi
Howard L. Jaffe, Lexington, MA
Rabbi Jennifer Jaech,
Rabbi Rebecca Joseph, New
Rabbi Bruce Kadden,
Tacoma, WA Rabbi
Amy Kalmanofsky, New York, NY
Rabbi Jeremy Kalmanofsky,
New York, NY
Rabbi Ben Kamin, Del Mar,
Rabbi Debra Newman Kamin,
Highland Park, IL Rabbi
Susan Kanoff, Philadelphia, PA Rabbi
Ken Kanter, Cincinnati, OH
Rabbi Patricia Karlin-Neumann,
Palo Alto, CA Rabbi Henry
Jay Karp, Davenport, IA Rabbi
Mario Karpuj, Sandy Springs, GA Rabbi
Nancy Kasten, Dallas, TX Rabbi
Jim Kaufman, Valley Village, CA Rabbi
David Kay, Orlando, Florida Rabbi
Benjamin G. Kelsen, Teaneck, NJ Rabbi
Jimmy Kessler, Galveston, TX Rabbi
Ralph P. Kingsley, Aventura, FL Rabbi
Andrew Klein, Barrington, RI Rabbi
Jason Klein, Baltimore, MD
Rabbi Jonathan Klein Los
Angeles, CA Rabbi
Lori Klein, Capitola, CA
Rabbi Myriam Klotz, Bala
Rabbi Norman Koch, New
Milford, CT Rabbi
Debora Kohn, Berkeley, CA
Rabbi Stephanie D. Kolin,
Rabbi Neil E Kominsky,
Brookline, MA Rabbi
Sandford Kopnick, Cincinnati, OH Rabbi
Ira Korinow, Haverhill, MA
Rabbi Allen Krause,
Mission Viejo, CA
Rabbi Lawrence Kushner,
San Francisco, CA
Rabbi Noa Kushner, San
Rabbi Steven Kushner,
Montclair, NJ Rabbi
Harold Kudan, Glencoe, IL
Rabbi Judith Kummer,
Rabbi Gail Labovitz, Los
Susan Laemmle, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi
Lynne Landsberg, Washington, DC
Rabbi Shira Lander
Baltimore, MD Rabbi
Michael Adam Latz, Seattle, WA
Rabbi Alan LaPayover,
Philadelphia, PA Rabbi
William Lebeau, New York, NY Rabbi
Morton Leifman, New York, NY Rabbi
Michael Lerner, San Francisco, CA
Rabbi Carol Levithan, New
York, NY Rabbi
Charles S. Levi, Deerfield, IL Rabbi
Joel Levine, Palm Beach Gardens, FL Rabbi
Yael Levy, Philadelphia, PA
Rabbi Valerie Lieber,
Brooklyn, NY Rabbi
Rebecca Lillian, Chicago, Illinois Rabbi
John A. Linder, Phoenix, AZ
Rabbi Steven Lowenstein,
Rabbi Jonathan Malamy,
White Plains, NY Rabbi
Jonathan Z. Maltzman, North Bethesda, MD Rabbi
Howard Mandell, Virginia Beach, VA Rabbi
Janet Marder, Palo Alto, CA Rabbi
Jeffrey M. Marker, Brooklyn, NY Rabbi
Susan Marks, Sarasota, FL Rabbi
Simeon Maslin, Philadelphia, PA Rabbi
J. Rolando Matalon, New York, NY
Rabbi Dennis N. Math, New
Rabbi Gary Mazo, Marstons
Mills, MA Rabbi Bernard
Mehlman, Brookline, MA Rabbi
Jim Michaels, Rockville, MD
Rabbi Shira Milgrom,
Rabbi Bennett Miller,
Monroe Township, NJ Rabbi
Joshua Minkin, Brooklyn, NY
Rabbi Victor Mirelman,
River Forest, IL
Rabbi Michael A. Monson,
West Orange, NJ Rabbi
Leon A. Morris, New York, NY Rabbi
Jay Henry Moses, New York, NY Rabbi
Anat Moskowitz, Denver, CO
Rabbi Dan Moskovitz,
Rabbi Shelly Moss, Sun
Rabbi Robin Nafshi,
Lebanon, NJ Rabbi
Perry Netter Los Angeles, CA Rabbi
Avi S. Olitzky, St. Louis Park, MN Rabbi
Kerry M. Olitzky, New York, NY Rabbi
Shaul Osadchey, Houston, TX
Rabbi Melinda Panken,
Manalapan, NJ Rabbi
Julie Pelc, Venice, California Rabbi
Daniel Plotkin, St. Louis, MO
Rabbi Dan Polish,
Rabbi Jeffrey Portman,
Iowa City, IA
Rabbi Linda Potemken,
Rabbi Amber Powers,
Rabbi Dan Rabishaw,
Northbrook, IL Rabbi
Bruce Raff, Woodland Hills, CA Rabbi
Avram I. Reisner, Baltimore, MD Rabbi
Michael Remson, Kenosha, WI
Rabbi Dorothy A. Richman,
Berkeley, CA Rabbi Yair
Robinson, Holland, PA
Rabbi Liz Rolle,
Rabbi Norman Roman, West
Bloomfield, MI Rabbi
Jack Romberg, Tallahassee, FL Rabbi
Carnie Shalom Rose, Creve Coeur, MO Rabbi
David Rosenn, New York, NY Rabbi
Jennie Rosenn, New York, NY Rabbi
Donald B. Rossoff, Morristown, NJ
Rabbi Dennis S. Ross,
Worcester, MA Rabbi
Gloria Rubin, Oakland, NJ Rabbi
Sarah Niebuhr Rubin, Keene, NH
Rabbi JB Sacks-Rosen, Los
Angeles, CA Rabbi Selig
Salkowitz, Fair Lawn, NJ Rabbi
Joanna Samuels, New York, NY Rabbi
David Sandmel, Chicago, IL
Rabbi Marty Scharf,
Rabbi Phil Schechter,
Rabbi Leonard A.
Schoolman, New York, NY Rabbi
Bob Schreibman, Lincolnshire, IL
Rabbi Barry Schwartz,
Cherry Hill, NJ
Rabbi Allen Secher,
Whitefish, MA Rabbi
Ron Segal, Atlanta, GA Rabbi
Allen Selis, St. Louis, MO
Rabbi Gerry Serotta,
Chevy Chase, MD
Rabbi Ike Serotta,
Rabbi Mark Dov Shapiro,
Longmeadow, MA Rabbi
Mark S. Shapiro, Glenview, IL Rabbi
Richard J. Shapiro Port Washington, NY
Rabbi Roxanne Shapiro,
Milwaukee, WI Rabbi
Leonard Sharzer, New York, NY Rabbi
John Sherwood, Oxnard, CA Rabbi
Howard Siegel, Houston, TX Rabbi
Howard Singer, Hinsdale, MA Rabbi
Jonathan Singer, Seattle, WA
Rabbi Suzanne Singer, Los
Angeles, CA Rabbi Eric J.
Siroka, South Bend, IN Rabbi
Eleanor Smith, Evanston, IL
Rabbi David Sofian,
Dayton, OH Rabbi Ruth
Sohn, Los Angeles, CA
Rabbi Myra Soifer, Reno,
Felicia L. Sol, New York, NY Rabbi
Rav Soloff, Lansdale, PA
Who runs Maraka?
3 min 37 sec - Oct 29, 2008 -
form Tekoa, Israel is praying in the
wailing wall for the election of Barak Obama
president. Rabbi Fruman
form Tekoa, Israel is
33 sec - Sep 18, 2008 -
Froman is Chief Rabbi
of the settlement of Tekoa
on the West Bank. ...
Kenes HaSanhedrin 5767 Rav Menachem Furman
What's At Stake?
A Rabbinic Letter to President-Elect Barack Obama
List of Signers
Asked Questions (FAQs)
to the Campaign
List of Signers:
- Rabbi Scott Aaron, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Stephanie Aaron, Tuscon, AZ
- Rabbi B. Elka Abrahamson, Columbus, OH
- Rabbi Alison Abrams, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi David L. Abramson, Marblehead, MA
- Rabbi Ruth Abusch-Magder, Evanston, IL
- Rabbi David Adelson, New York, NY
- Rabbi Jonathan F. Adland, Indianapolis, IN
- Rabbi Alison P. Adler, Hamden, CT
- Rabbi Sara O'Donnell Adler, Ann Arbor, MI
- Rabbi Richard Agler, Boca Raton, FL
- Rabbinical Student Aura Ahuvia, Ann Arbor, MI
- Cantor Joanna M. Alexander, Marlboro, NJ
- Rabbi Katy Z. Allen, Wayland, MA
- Rabbi Adam M. Allenberg, Los Altos Hills, CA
- Rabbi Renni S. Altman, Great Neck, NY
- Cantoral Student Azita Amini, Los Angeles, CA
- Cantor Michael Anatole, Ventura, CA
- Rabbi Julia Andelman, New York, NY
- Cantor Dana Anesi, Chappaqua, NY
- Rabbi Camille Shira Angel, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Sharon Cohen Anisfeld, Newton, MA
- Rabbinical Student Julia B. Appel, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi David Ariel-Joel, Louisville, KY
- Rabbi Benjamin L. Arnold, Evergreen, CO
- Rabbi Stephen A. Arnold, South Easton, MA
- Rabbi Arik W. Ascherman, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Rapael W. Asher, Walnut Creek, CA
- Cantor Risa Askin, Coral Springs, FL
- Cantor Margery Auerbach, Silver Spring, MD
- Rabbinical Student Guy Izhak Austrian, New York, NY
- Cantor Wendy J. Autenrieth, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
- Rabbinical Student Susan J. Averbach, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Albert Axelrad, Boston, MA
- Rabbi Aryeh Azriel, Omaha, NE
- Rabbi Larry Bach, El Paso, TX
- Rabbi Andy Bachman, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbinical Student Rachel Bareblat, Williamstown, MA
- Rabbi Amy Bardack, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Pearl Barlev, Venice, CA
- Rabbi Uri Barnea, Hattiesburg, MS
- Rabbi Benjamin Barnett, Corvallis, OR
- Rabbinical Student Lisa Barrett, Newton Centre, MA
- Rabbi Bernard Barsky, Dayton, OH
- Rabbi Lewis M. Barth, Encino, CA
- Rabbi Israel J. Barzak, Ormond Beach, FL
- Rabbi Morris W. Barzilai, New Rochelle, NY
- Rabbi Geoffrey Basik, Baltimore, MD
- Rabbi Eliot Baskin, Greenwood Village, CO
- Rabbi Rachel Bat-Or, Macon, GA
- Rabbi David Dunn Bauer, Amherst, MA
- Rabbi Renee H. Bauer, Madison, WI
- Rabbi Pamela Frydman Baugh, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Brian K. Beal, Upper Nyack, NY
- Rabbi Dennis Beck-Berman, Petersburg, VA
- Rabbi Shelley Kovar Becker, Floral Park, NY
- Rabbi Micah Becker-Klein, Springfield, MA
- Rabbi Anne E. Belford, Saint Louis, MO
- Rabbi Marc J. Belgrad, Buffalo Grove, IL
- Rabbi Lisa Sari Bellows, Buffalo Grove, IL
- Rabbi Arnold Mark Belzer, Savannah, GA
- Rabbi Karen Bender, Tarzana, CA
- Rabbi Moshe ben Asher, Chatsworth, CA
- Rabbinical Student Olivier Solomon BenHaim, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Allen Bennett, Alameda, CA
- Rabbi James M. Bennett, St Louis, MO
- Rabbi Jeffrey Bennett, Newington, CT
- Rabbi Aaron D. Benson, East Brunswick, NJ
- Rabbi Philip J. Bentley, Hendersonville, NC
- Cantor David Berger, New York, NY
- Rabbi Jonathan Meir Berger, Farmington Hills, MI
- Rabbi Sheri Berger, Montpelier, VT
- Rabbinical Student Yehuda Berger, New York, NY
- Rabbi Donald Robert Berlin, St. Michaels, MD
- Rabbinical Student Daniel Asher Berman, Brighton, MA
- Rabbi Donna Barbara Berman, Bloomfield, CT
- Rabbi Howard Berman, Jamaica Plain, MA
- Rabbinical Student Joseph Michael Berman, Jamaica Plain, MA
- Rabbi Marjorie Berman, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Phyllis Ocean Berman, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Leila Gal Berner, Kensington, MD
- Cantoral Student Rachel Berney, Brooklyn, NY
- Cantor Charlie Bernhardt, Laurel, MD
- Rabbinical Student Stephanie Laskin Bernstein, Bethesda, MD
- Rabbi Steve Bernstein, Kibbutz Gezer, Israel
- Rabbi Allison Berry, Canton, MA
- Rabbi Linda Earle Bertenthal, Encino, CA
- Rabbinical Student Brian Besser, West Topsham, VT
- Cantor Marie G. Betcher, Austin, TX
- Rabbi Elizabeth Beyer, Reno, NV
- Rabbi Jonathan Arthur Biatch, Madison, WI
- Rabbi Binyamin Biber, Washington, DC
- Cantor Mark Biddelman, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
- Cantor Ira Bigeleisen, Valley Village, CA
- Cantor Martha Rock Birnbaum, Richmond, CA
- Rabbi Aaron Benjamin Bisno, Pittsburgh, PA
- Cantor Freyda Black, Cheltenham, PA
- Rabbi Kalman P. Bland, Durham, NC
- Cantor Steven Blane, New Milford, NJ
- Rabbi Stacey Blank, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Barry Block, San Antonio, TX
- Rabbi Erwin Allan Bloom, Davie, FL
- Rabbi Herman J. Blumberg, Waban, MA
- Rabbi Rena S. Blumenthal, Poughkeepsie, NY
- Rabbi Shalom Bochner, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbinical Student Eliav Bock, New York, NY
- Rabbi Joshua Boettiger, Bennington, VT
- Rabbi Lewis Bogage, Denver, CO
- Rabbi Sandy Bogin, White Plains, NY
- Rabbi Elizabeth Bolton, Baltimore, MD
- Rabbi Terry A. Bookman, Pinecrest, FL
- Rabbi Stephen Booth-Nadav, Denver, CO
- Rabbi Jill Borodin, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Neal Ivan Borovitz, River Edge, NJ
- Rabbi Barbara Borts, Santa Clara, CA
- Rabbi Anna Boswell-Levy, Langhorne, PA
- Cantor Rosalie Boxt, Kensington, MD
- Cantor Richard Botton, Harrison, NY
- Cantor Leslie F. Boyer, Troy, NY
- Rabbi James Brandt, Oakland, CA
- Rabbi Deborah K. Bravo, Edison, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Rachael M. Bregman, Astoria, NY
- Rabbi Kenneth Brickman, New York, NY
- Rabbi Gerald S. Brieger, Orange, CT
- Rabbi Deborah J. Brin, Albuquerque, NM
- Rabbi Charles K. Briskin, San Pedro, CA
- Rabbi Gill Brociner, New York, NY
- Rabbi Herbert Brockman, Hamden, CT
- Rabbi Lynn Brody, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Caryn Broitman, Vineyard Haven, MA
- Rabbi Daniel M. Bronstein, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Herbert Bronstein, Glencoe, IL
- Rabbi Lester B. Bronstein, White Plains, NY
- Rabbi Marcelo Bronstein, New York, NY
- Rabbi Samuel G. Broude, Oakland, CA
- Rabbi Sharon Brous, Los Angeles, CA
- Cantor Arianne Brown, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Carey Brown, Arlington, MA
- Rabbi Rachel Brown, Phoenixville, PA
- Rabbi Jonathan D. Brumberg-Kraus, Providence, RI
- Rabbi David Brusin, Whitefish Bay, WI
- Cantor Scott Buckner, Minnetonka, MN
- Rabbi Susan D. Bulba Carvutto, Augusta, ME
- Rabbi Daniel Cotzin Burg, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Marcus L. Burstein, Township of Washington, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Daniel Burstyn, Pittsburgh, PA
- Rabbi Rob Cabelli, Asheville, NC
- Rabbi Carol Caine, Albany, CA
- Cantor Marnie Camhi, Aberdeen, NJ
- Rabbi Debra Sue Cantor, Newington, CT
- Rabbi Adalah Caplowe, Pittsburgh, PA
- Cantor Rebecca S. Carl, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbinical Student Reba Carmel, Cheltenham, PA
- Cantor Susan Caro, Thousand Oaks, CA
- Rabbi Donald P. Cashman, Albany, NY
- Rabbi Adam Chalom, Highland Park, IL
- Rabbi Joshua Chasan, Burlington, VT
- Rabbinical Student Yafa Chase, Santa Fe, NM
- Rabbi Kenneth Chasen, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Steven Chester, Oakland, CA
- Cantor Daniel Chodos, S. Pasadena, CA
- Rabbi Jennifer Clayman, Los Altos Hills, CA
- Cantor Sheila Cline, West Roxbury, MA
- Rabbi Alan L. Cohen, Overland Park, KS
- Rabbi Ayelet S. Cohen, New York, NY
- Rabbi Debrah Cohen, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Eli Cohen, Santa Cruz, CA
- Cantor Gerald Cohen, Scarsdale, NY
- Rabbi Heidi Cohen, Santa Ana, CA
- Rabbi Howard A. Cohen, Greensboro, NC
- Rabbi Michael M. Cohen, Manchester Center, VT
- Rabbi Paul Cohen, Northfield, IL
- Rabbi Judy Cohen-Rosenberg, Westbury, NY
- Rabbi Andrea S. Cohen-Kiener, West Hartford, CT
- Rabbi Hillel Cohn, San Bernardino, CA
- Rabbi Richard Cohn, Dallas, TX
- Rabbi Scott E. Colbert, Atlanta, GA
- Cantor Phyllis S. Cole, Westwood, NJ
- Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels, Santa Monica, CA
- Rabbi Karen Companez, Flint, MI
- Rabbi Shoshanah Jaren Conover, Chicago, IL
- Cantor Erik Contzuis, New Rochelle, NY
- Rabbi Alan Cook, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi David J. Cooper, Piedmont, CA
- Rabbi Mychal Heather Copeland, Stanford, CA
- Rabbi Rachel B. Cowan, New York, NY
- Rabbinical Student Jill Cozen-Harel, New York, NY
- Rabbi Meryl M. Crean, Media, PA
- Rabbi Menachem Creditor, Berkeley, CA
- Cantor Don Alan Croll, Dallas, TX
- Rabbinical Student Rogerio Zingerevitz Cukierman, Newton Highlands, MA
- Rabbi Matt Cutler, Schenectady, NY
- Rabbi William Cutter, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Eric Charles Cytryn, Harrisburg, PA
- Rabbi Julie Hilton Danan, Chico, CA
- Rabbi Dan Danson, Wausau, WI
- Rabbi Benjamin David, Roslyn Heights, NY
- Cantor Deborah Judith Davis, San Diego, CA
- Rabbinical Student Getzel Davis, Brookline, MA
- Cantor Michael Davis, Highland Park, IL
- Cantor Gerald Debruin, Buffalo, NY
- Rabbinical Student Lisa Delson, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbi Geoffrey W. Dennis, Flower Mound, TX
- Rabbi Lavey Yitzchak Derby, Mill Valley, CA
- Rabbi James S. Diamond, Princeton, NJ
- Rabbi Lucy Dinner, Raleigh, NC
- Rabbi Fred Scherlinder Dobb, Bethesda, MD
- Rabbi Robert Dobrusin, Ann Arbor, MI
- Rabbi Art Donsky, Allison Park, PA
- Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Bel-Air, CA
- Rabbi William Dreskin, White Plains, NY
- Rabbinic Student Hannah Dresner, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Israel S. Dresner, Wayne, NJ
- Rabbi Ellen Weinberg Dreyfus, Homewood, IL
- Rabbi Howard Druan, Tucson, AZ
- Rabbi Malka T. Drucker, Santa Fe, NM
- Rabbi Elizabeth Dunsker, Vancouver, WA
- Rabbi Renee Beth Edelman, South Orange, NJ
- Rabbi Judith Barbara Edelstein, New York, NY
- Rabbi Lisa Edwards, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Irvin Ehrlich, Colorado Springs, CO
- Rabbi Joab Eichenberg-Eilon, Atlanta, GA
- Rabbi Amy Eilberg, Mendota Heights, MN
- Cantor Roy Bennett Einhorn, Boston, MA
- Rabbi Stephen J. Einstein, Fountain Valley, CA
- Rabbi Bruce Elder, Highland Park, IL
- Rabbi Diane A. Elliot, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi David Ellis, Halifax, NS
- Rabbi Gary W. Ellison, Salem, OR
- Rabbi Barat Ellman, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Sue Levi Elwell, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Daniel Epstein, Fair Lawn, NJ
- Rabbi Greg M. Epstein, Cambridge, MA
- Cantor Rachel Hirsh Epstein, Bethesda, MD
- Rabbi Lewis John Eron, Cherry Hill, NJ
- Rabbi Rachel Esserman, Endwell, NY
- Rabbi Helaine Ettinger, Kinnelon, NJ
- Rabbi Kim Ettlinger, Burlingame, CA
- Cantorial Student Shulamit Wise Fairman, Oakland, CA
- Rabbinical Student John Peter Falchi, San Diego, CA
- Rabbi Ted Falcon, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Milton Feierstein, Stoughton, MA
- Rabbi Charles M. Feinberg, Washington, DC
- Rabbi Michael Edward Feinberg, New York, NY
- Rabbi Dena A. Feingold, Kenosha, WI
- Rabbi Sam E. Feinsmith, New York, NY
- Rabbi Edward Feld, Northampton, MA
- Rabbi Fern Feldman, Santa Cruz, CA
- Rabbi Jen Feldman, Chapel Hill, NC
- Rabbi Meir A. Feldman, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Ted Feldman, Petaluma, CA
- Rabbi Dan Fellman, New Brunswick. NJ
- Rabbi Susan Fendrick, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Michael L. Feshbach, Chevy Chase, MD
- Rabbi Brian D. Field, Denver, CO
- Cantor Geoffrey Fine, Belmont, MA
- Rabbi Jacob Elisha Fine, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Steven Fineblum, Cinnaminson, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Brian Fink, University Heights, OH
- Rabbi Tirzah Firestone, Boulder, CO
- Rabbi Frank A. Fischer, Chapel Hill, NC
- Rabbi Michelle Fisher, Walnut Creek, CA
- Rabbi Alan Flam, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Nancy Flam, Northampton, MA
- Rabbi Randy Craig Fleisher, St. Louis, MO
- Cantor Rebecca Joy Fletcher, New York, NY
- Rabbi Arthur Flicker, Albuquerque, NM
- Rabbi Steven Folberg, Austin, TX
- Rabbi Alissa Forrest, Lafayette, CA
- Rabbi Steven Edward Foster, Denver, CO
- Rabbi Jeff Foust, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Scott Michael Fox, Encinitas, CA
- Rabbinical Josh Frankel, New York, NY
- Rabbi John Franken, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Wayne M. Franklin, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Les Frazin, Northbrook, IL
- Rabbi Alan Freedman, Austin, TX
- Rabbi Carla Freedman, South Salem, NY
- Rabbi Paul Freedman, St. Albans, England
- Cantor Stephen Freedman, Dresher, PA
- Rabbi Jonathan Freirich, Stateline, NV
- Cantor Howard Friedland, Glenview, IL
- Rabbi Barry Friedman, Hopatcong, NJ
- Rabbi Dayle A. Friedman, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi John Friedman, Durham, NC
- Rabbi Ronne Friedman, Boston, MA
- Rabbinical Student Shoshana Friedman, Jamaica Plain, MA
- Rabbi Stacy Friedman, San Rafael, CA
- Rabbi Suri Friedman, Durham, NC
- Rabbi Thomas Joseph Friedmann, Columbus, GA
- Rabbi Dara Beth Frimmer, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Elyse Frishman, Franklin Lakes, NJ
- Rabbi Nancy Fuchs-Kreimer, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbinical Student Natan Fuchs, Lathrup Village, MI
- Rabbi Stephen Fuchs, West Hartford, CT
- Rabbi Capers C. Funnye, Jr., Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Roy S. Furman, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Joyce Galaski, Amherst, MA
- Rabbi Robert Gamer, Long Grove, IL
- Rabbi Hillel Gamoran, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Steven Garten, Ottawa, ON
- Rabbi Rachel Gartner, Oxford, OH
- Rabbi Ruth E. Gelfarb, Houston, TX
- Rabbi Everett E. Gendler, Great Barrington, MA
- Rabbi Stuart Weinberg Gershon, Summit, NJ
- Rabbi Bernard Gerson, Denver, CO
- Rabbi Gary S. Gerson, Oak Park, IL
- Rabbinical Student Jordie Gerson, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Matthew Gewirtz, Short Hills, NJ
- Rabbi Sara Gilbert, Greeley, CO
- Rabbi Elliot K. Ginsburg, Ann Arbor, MI
- Rabbi George Dean Gittleman, Santa Rosa, CA
- Rabbi Aubrey Lyle Glazer, Harrison, NY
- Rabbinical Student Ilan Glazer, Boulder, CO
- Rabbi Rosalind Glazer, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Mark Glickman, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Gail G. Glicksman, Wyncote, PA
- Rabbi Robert J. Gluck, Albany, NY
- Rabbi Shai Gluskin, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Ben-Zion Gold, Cambridge, MA
- Rabbi Laura Gold, New York, NY
- Rabbi Neal Gold, Wayland, MA
- Rabbi Rosalind A. Gold, Reston, VA
- Rabbi Shefa Gold, Jemez Springs, NM
- Cantor Dorothy Goldberg, Wallingford, CT
- Rabbi Dan Goldblatt, Danville, CA
- Rabbi Irwin N. Goldenberg, Forest Hills, NY
- Rabbi Rachel Goldenberg, Chester, CT
- Rabbi Eva Goldfinger, Toronto, ON
- Rabbi Michael Mordechai Goldman, Durham, NC
- Rabbi Barbara Goldman-Wartell, Orefield, PA
- Rabbi Andrea Goldstein, St. Louis, MO
- Cantor David Goldstein, Glencoe, IL
- Rabbi Debra E. Goldstein, Larchmont, NY
- Rabbinical Student Justin Goldstein, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Meir Goldstein, Chattanooga, TN
- Rabbi Seth Goldstein, Olympia, WA
- Rabbi Jeffrey Wolfson Goldwasser, North Adams, MA
- Rabbi Paul Golomb, Poughkeepsie, NY
- Rabbi Linda Henry Goodman, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Mark Asher Goodman, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Marvin Goodman, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbinical Student Michael Goodman, Madison, WI
- Rabbi Don Goor, Tarzana, CA
- Rabbi Marc H. Gopin, Silver Spring, MD
- Rabbi David Gordis, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Andrew Gordon, Scarsdale, NY
- Rabbi Debra Gordon, Troy, NY
- Cantor Jonathan Ben Gordon, White Plains, NY
- Rabbi Maralee Gordon, Woodstock, IL
- Rabbi William Joseph Gordon, Chatsworth, CA
- Cantor Ralph Goren, Egg Harbor, NJ
- Rabbi Seth Goren, Bethlehem, PA
- Rabbi Uri Goren, Oceanside, NY
- Rabbinical Student Emma Gottlieb, New York, NY
- Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Mel Gottlieb, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Andrea M. Gouze, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Roberto Graetz, Lafayette, CA
- Rabbi Arthur Green, Newton, MA
- Rabbi C. Michelle Greenberg, Northfield, IL
- Rabbi James Israel Greene, Salem, OR
- Rabbinical Student Jarah Greenfield, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Terry M. Greenstein, Sharon, MA
- Rabbinical Student Adam Ron Greenwald, Long Beach, CA
- Cantor Kay Greenwald, Los Altos Hills, CA
- Rabbi Nicole Greninger, San Jose, CA
- Rabbi Suzanne Griffel, Chicago, IL
- Rabbinical Student Michael Steven Gross, Phoenixville, PA
- Rabbi Peter H. Grumbacher, Wilmington, DE
- Rabbi Chaya Gussfield, Oakland, CA
- Rabbi Joshua Gutoff, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Leslie Gutterman, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Debra R. Hachen, Demarest, NJ
- Rabbi Andrew Hahn, New York, NY
- Rabbi Kevin Hale, Leeds, MA
- Rabbi Moshe Rafael Halfon, Long Beach, CA
- Rabbi Stanley D. Halpern, Gary, IN
- Cantor Leslie Hamilton, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Jill Hammer, Riverdale, NY
- Rabbi Edwin S. Harris, Saint Louis, MO
- Rabbi Maurice Harris, Eugene, OR
- Rabbi Vered L. Harris, Overland Park, KS
- Rabbi Patti Haskell, Encinitas, CA
- Rabbi Abraham Havivi, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Nara Hefetz, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Shai Held, Providence, RI
- Rabbinical Student Olivia Hemming, San Marcos, CA
- Rabbinical Student Sandra Ariela Hendin, Wyncote, PA
- Rabbi Lauren Grabelle Herrmann, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Garson Herzfeld, Brooklyn, NY
- Cantor Steven Gary Hevenstone, Marietta, GA
- Rabbi Jay B. Heyman, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Moshe Thomas Heyn, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbinical Student Neil E. Hirsch, New York, NY
- Rabbi Aryeh Hirschfield, z"l Portland, OR
- Rabbi Erin Hirsh, Glenside, PA
- Rabbinical Student Jane Hodgetts, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Elliot Holin, Dresher, PA
- Cantoral Student Leah Ellie Holland, West Orange, NJ
- Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt, New Haven, CT
- Rabbi Linda J. Holtzman, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Michael G. Holzman, Philadelphia, PA
- Cantor Terry Horowit, Albany, NY
- Rabbi Sarah R. Hronsky, Valley Village, CA
- Rabbi Jocee Hudson, Santa Ana, CA
- Rabbi Mark Hurvitz, New York, NY
- Rabbi Yitzhak Husbands-Hankin, Eugene, OR
- Rabbinical Student Aaron A. Hutman, Scottsdale, AZ
- Cantor Bradley Hyman, Plainview, NY
- Rabbi Micah Hyman, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Ivan Ickovits, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi T’mimah Audrey Ickovits, Santa Monica, CA
- Rabbi Shirley Idelson, Jackson Heights, NY
- Rabbi David A. Ingber, New York, NY
- Rabbinical Student Sandi Intraub, Bayside, NY
- Rabbi Daniel S. Isaacson, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Daniel J. Isaak, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Shaya Isenberg, Gainesville, FL
- Rabbi Marci Jacobs, Lexington, MA
- Rabbi Richard Jacobs, Scarsdale, NY
- Rabbi Steven B. Jacobs, Woodland Hills, CA
- Cantoral Student Zoe Jacobs, New York, NY
- Rabbi Burt Jacobson, Piedmont, CA
- Cantor Deborah Jacobson, Clearwater, FL
- Rabbi Devorah L. Jacobson, Amherst, MA
- Rabbinical Student Darla Jacobs-Velde, Philidelphia, PA
- Rabbinical Student Joshua Gilberg Jacobs-Velde, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Jennifer A. Jaech, Croton-on-Hudson, NY
- Rabbi Howard L. Jaffe, Lexington, MA
- Cantoral Student Marisa Elana James, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Norman Janis, Cambridge, MA
- Rabbi Beth Anne Janus, Santa Cruz, CA
- Rabbi Amita Jarmon, Rockland, ME
- Cantoral Student Russell George Jayne, Boonton, NJ
- Rabbi Miriam Jerris, Farmington Hills, MI
- Rabbi Paul J. Joseph, Long Beach, NY
- Rabbi Samuel K. Joseph, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbi Daniel Judson, Roslindale, MA
- Rabbi Eitan Julius, Galliee, Israel
- Rabbi Raachel Nathan Jurovics, Raleigh, NC
- Rabbi Bruce Kadden, Tacoma, WA
- Rabbinical Student James Kahn, Boston, MA
- Rabbi Yoel Kahn, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Rachel Kahn-Troster, Teaneck, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Daniel Kaiman, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi David Kalman, Gainesville, FL
- Rabbi mark Kaiserman, Livingston, NJ
- Rabbi Sylvan D. Kamens, Saint Paul, MN
- Rabbi Jane Kanarek, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Kenneth Kanter, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbi Raphael Joshua Kanter, New Bedford, MA
- Rabbi Daniel Lee Kaplan, Norton, MA
- Rabbi Laura Duhan Kaplan, Charlotte, NC
- Rabbi Henry Jay Karp, Davenport, IA
- Rabbi Mario Karpuj, Atlanta, GA
- Rabbi Peter Edward Kasdan, Longboat Key, FL
- Rabbi Debra Kassoff, Marblehead, MA
- Rabbi Nancy Kasten, Dallas, TX
- Rabbinical Student David Katz, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Hillel Katzir, Auburn, ME
- Cantor Aviva Ann Katzman, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Stephen A. Kaufman, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbi Alvan Kaunfer, Providence, RI
- Cantor Evan Kent, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Stuart Kelman, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Justin S. Kerber, Athens, GA
- Rabbi Peg Kershenbaum, New City, NY
- Cantor Jack Kessler, Philadelphia, PA
- Cantor Penny Kessler, Danbury, CT
- Rabbi Stanley Kessler, West Hartford, CT
- Cantoral Student Marl Kilgallon, Cornelius, NC
- Rabbi Jason Kimelman-Block, Rockville, MD
- Rabbi Yohanna Kinberg, Olympia, WA
- Rabbinical Student Emma Kippley-Ogman, Little Canada, MN
- Rabbi Donna Kirshbaum, Princeton, NJ
- Rabbi Beth H. Klafter, Melville, NY
- Rabbinical Student Daniel Klein, Cambridge, MA
- Rabbi Jason Klein, Baltimore, MD
- Rabbi Jonathan Klein, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Joseph Klein, Oak Park, MI
- Rabbi Lori Diane Klein, Santa Cruz, CA
- Rabbinical Student Margaret Frisch Klein, North Chelmsford, MA
- Rabbinical Student Margie N. Klein, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Melissa Klein, Allentown, PA
- Rabbi Stephen A. Klein, Scarsdale, NY
- Rabbi Sharon A. Kleinbaum, New York, NY
- Rabbi Robert G. Klensin, Augusta, GA
- Cantor Jeff Klepper, West Roxbury, MA
- Rabbi Jonathan Kligler, Woodstock, NY
- Cantor Yonah Kliger, Beverly Hills, CA
- Rabbi David L. Kline, West Roxbury, MA
- Rabbi Marc Kline, Lexington, KY
- Rabbi Myriam Klotz, Bala Cynwyd, PA
- Rabbi Peter Knobel, Evanston, IL
- Rabbi Alison B. Kobey, Rochester, NY
- Rabbi Norman D. Koch, New Milford, CT
- Rabbi Claudio Javier Kogan, New Brunswick, NJ
- Cantor Sharon Kohn, Overland Park, KS
- Rabbi Stephanie D. Kolin, Boston, MA
- Rabbinical Student Debra Ruth Kolodny, Silver Spring, MD
- Rabbi Tamara Kolton, Farmington Hills, MI
- Rabbi Neil Kominsky, Brookline, MA
- Cantor Kim Komrad, Gaithersburg, MD
- Rabbi Elisa F. Koppel, New York, NY
- Rabbi Ira L. Korinow, Haverhill, MA
- Cantor Leigh Korn, Lafayette, CA
- Rabbinical Student Jodi Kornfeld, Deerfield, IL
- Rabbi Emily Faust Korzenik, Scarsdale, NY
- Rabbi Raquel S. Kosovske, Northampton, MA
- Rabbi Chava Eva Koster, New York, NY
- Rabbi Julie Anna Kozlow, Greenville, SC
- Rabbi Michael Louis Kramer, Wantagh, NY
- Rabbi Douglas E. Krantz, Armonk, NY
- Rabbi Jonathan Kraus, Belmont, MA
- Rabbi Allen Krause, Mission Viejo, CA
- Rabbi Leonard Sanford Kravitz, Hackensack, NJ
- Rabbi Claudia Kreiman, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Barry Krieger, Greenland, NH
- Rabbi Suri Krieger, Orange, CT
- Rabbi Charles Kroloff, Westfield, NJ
- Rabbi Irwin Kula, New York, NY
- Rabbi Judith D. Kummer, Roslindale, MA
- Cantoral Student Sharon I. Kunitz, Jersey City, NJ
- Rabbi David Kuperman, Silver Spring, MD
- Rabbi Jeffrey Kurtz-Lendner, Hollywood, FL
- Rabbi Gail Labovitz, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Alan Lachtman, Temple City, CA
- Rabbi Susan Laemmle, Los Angeles, CA
- Cantor Regina Lambert-Hayut, Washington, NJ
- Rabbi Stephen David Landau, Bloomfield, CT
- Rabbi Yechiael Lander, Northampton, MA
- Rabbi Lynne F. Landsberg, Washington, DC
- Cantor Nancy Diamond Landsman, Glencoe, IL
- Rabbi Karen Esther Landy, Brookline, MA
- Cantor Frank Lanzkron-Tamarazo, Farmington Hills, MI
- Cantor Shoshana Lash, Ansonia, CT
- Rabbi Michael Adam Latz, Seattle, WA
- Rabbinical Student Adam Lavitt, Jamaica Plain, MA
- Rabbi Anson Laytner, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Ebn D. Leader, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Esther Lederman, New York, NY
- Rabbi Saul Leeman, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Barry Leff, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Allan Lehmann, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Benjamin Leinow, Escondido, CA
- Rabbi Shoshana Leis, New York, NY
- Rabbi Michele E. Lenke, Needham, MA
- Rabbi David Lerner, Lexington, MA
- Rabbi Michael Lerner, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Joshua C. Lesser, Atlanta, GA
- Rabbinical Student Marion Lev Cohen, New York, NY
- Rabbi Joel Levenson, Woodbridge, CT
- Rabbi Peter S. Levi, Aliso Viejo, CA
- Rabbi Mark Howard Levin, Overland Park, KS
- Cantor Sheldon M. Levin, Metuchen, NJ
- Cantor Samuel E. Levine, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Joshua Levine-Grater, Pasadena, CA
- Cantor Martin Levson, Springfield, MA
- Rabbi Eugene Henry Levy, Little Rock, AR
- Rabbinical Student Karen Levy, Thornhill, ON
- Cantoral Student Mark A. Levy, Felton, CA
- Rabbi Richard Levy, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Robert Douglas Levy, Ann Arbor, MI
- Rabbi Stan Levy, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Sue E. Levy, Webster, TX
- Rabbi Yael Levy, Philadelphia, PA
- Cantor Galit Levy-Slater, Seal Beach, CA
- Rabbi Sheldon Lewis, Palo Alto, CA
- Rabbi Michael J. Lezak, San Rafael, CA
- Rabbi Laura S. Lieber, Durham, NC
- Rabbi R. Mordechai Liebling, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Howard V. Lifshitz, Long Grove, IL
- Rabbi Rebecca Lillian, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Seth Morse Limmer, Armonk, NY
- Rabbi Ellen Lippmann, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Greg Litcofsky, Natick, MA
- Rabbi Richard M. Litvak, Aptos, CA
- Rabbi Alan E Litwak, N. Miami Beach, FL
- Rabbi Daveen H. Litwin, Grinnell, IA
- Rabbi Mark Loeb, Baltimore, MD
- Rabbi Neal Joseph Loevinger, Poughkeepsie, NY
- Rabbi Harold Londer, Golden Valley, MN
- Rabbi Andrea C. London, Evanston, IL
- Rabbi Scott Looper, Vernon Hills, IL
- Rabbi Michael Lotker, Camarillo, CA
- Rabbi Alan Herbert Lovins, New Haven, CT
- Cantor Jonathan Lovins, West Hartford, CT
- Rabbi Steven Lowenstein, Glencoe, IL
- Rabbi Michael Luckens, Concord, MA
- Cantoral Student Abbe Lyons, Ithaca, NY
- Rabbi Sarah E. Mack, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Jill Maderer, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Dana Magat, San Jose, CA
- Rabbi Shaul Magid, Bloomington, IN
- Rabbinical Student David Mahanymi, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Joseph Mahoney, Muncie, IN
- Rabbi Jonathan Malino, Greensboro, NC
- Rabbi Tamar Sarah Malino, San Mateo, CA
- Rabbi Mitch Malkus, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Mark Mallach, Springfield, NJ
- Rabbi Jonathan Z. Maltzman, Bethesda, MD
- Cantor Ilan Mamber, Wyckoff, NJ
- Rabbi Nina Hope Mandel, Sunbury, PA
- Rabbi Harry A. Manhoff, San Leandro, CA
- Rabbi Paula Marcus, Aptos, CA
- Rabbi Morris Margolies, Overland Park, KS
- Rabbi Shana Margolin, Montpelier, VT
- Rabbinical Student Robin E. Margolis, Takoma Park, MD
- Rabbi Marc Margolius, New York, NY
- Rabbi Bonnie Margulis, Madison, WI
- Rabbi Randall Mark, Wayne, NJ
- Rabbi Jeffrey M Marker, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Jessica Kessler Marshall, Chapel Hill, NC
- Rabbi Nathan Martin, Ann Arbor, MI
- Rabbi Robert Marx, Saugatuck, MI
- Rabbi Simeon J. Maslin, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon, New York, NY
- Rabbi Dennis Math, New York, NY
- Rabbinical Student Emily Mathis, Providence, RI
- Rabbinical Student Laurie Matzkin, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Brian J. Mayer, Providence, RI
- Rabbi Vivian S. Mayer, Wyncote, PA
- Rabbi Aryeh Meir, Teaneck, NJ
- Rabbi Rim Meirowitz, Winchester, MA
- Rabbi Amy L. Memis-Foler, Skokie, IL
- Rabbi Norman T. Mendel, San Luis Obispo, CA
- Rabbi Paul J Menitoff, Palm Beach, FL
- Rabbi Joseph Meszler, Sharon, MA
- Rabbinical Student Jessica Kate Meyer, Belmont, MA
- Rabbi Margaret J. Meyer, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbi Edith M. Meyerson, New York, NY
- Rabbinical Student Abby Michaleski, Hammonton, NJ
- Rabbi Michael Michlin, Hazleton, PA
- Rabbi Laurence Elis Milder, Westborough, MA
- Rabbi Eric Milgrim, East Brunswick, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Erica N. Miller, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Tamara Miller, Washington, DC
- Rabbi Yitzhak Joel Miller, Santa Cruz, CA
- Rabbi Joshua E. Minkin, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Lewis Mintz, Acton, MA
- Rabbi Yocheved Mintz, Las Vegas, NV
- Rabbi Victor A. Mirelman, River Forest, IL
- Rabbi Michael R. Mishkin, Wilmette, IL
- Rabbi Michelle Missaghieh, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Malka Mittelman, La Crescenta, CA
- Rabbi David Mivasair, Vancouver, BC
- Rabbi Katie Mizrahi, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Stephen Fisher Moch, Holiday, FL
- Rabbi Reuben Modek, Nyack, NY
- Rabbi Jack L. Moline, Alexandria, VA
- Rabbi Adam Morris, Denver, CO
- Cantor Jan Morrison, Columbia, MD
- Rabbi Jeremy S. Morrison, Boston, MA
- Rabbi Ben Morrow, Santa Fe, NM
- Rabbi Jay Moses, New York, NY
- Rabbi Linda Motzkin, Saratoga Springs, NY
- Cantor Richard Nadel, Springfield, NJ
- Cantor Shira Ariel Nafshi, Morristown, NJ
- Rabbi Yitzhak Nates, Narberth, PA
- Rabbi David W. Nelson, Tivoli, NY
- Rabbinical Student Lev B.J. Nelson, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Ben M Newman, Bronx, NY
- Rabbi Sheryl Lynne Nosan-Blank, Orangevale, CA
- Cantorial Student Mark Novak, Washington, DC
- Rabbi Leah Novick, Carmel, CA
- Cantor Martha Novick, Westfield, NJ
- Rabbi Rachel Nussbaum, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Janet I. Offell, Woodland Hills, CA
- Rabbi David Oler, Deerfield, IL
- Rabbinic Student Seth Oppenheimer, Starkville, MS
- Rabbi Jonathan Omer-Man, Berkeley, CA
- Cantor Shana Onigman, Morristown, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Hannah Orden, Milton, MA
- Rabbi Susan Oren, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Jehiel Orenstein, South Orange, NJ
- Rabbi Saul F. Oresky, Silver Spring, MD
- Rabbi David Osachy, Winter Park, FL
- Cantor Barbara Ostfeld, Buffalo, NY
- Cantor Anna West Ott, New Brunswick, NJ
- Rabbi Laura Owens, Beverly Hills, CA
- Rabbi Sara Paasche-Orlow, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Andrew M. Paley, Dallas, TX
- Rabbi Alexis Pearce, San Diego, CA
- Rabbi Barbara Rosman Penzner, West Roxbury, MA
- Rabbi Cheryl Peretz, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbinical Student Jill Perlman, New York, NY
- Rabbi Jonathan Perlman, Minneapolis, MN
- Cantor Hasha Musha Perman, Skokie, IL
- Cantor Mark Perman, Marietta, GA
- Rabbi Shoshana Perry, Chelmsford, MA
- Rabbi Aaron M. Petuchowski, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Laurie Phillips, New York, NY
- Rabbi Steve Pinsky, Wellington, FL
- Rabbi Richard J. Plavin, Manchester, CT
- Rabbi William Plevan, New York, NY
- Rabbi Michael Pont, Aberdeen, NJ
- Rabbi Jeff Portman, Iowa City, IA
- Rabbinical Student Eve B. Posen, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Philip M. Posner, Wimberley, TX
- Rabbi Oren J. Postrel, Napa, CA
- Rabbi Amber Powers, Wyncote, PA
- Rabbi Marcia Prager, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Richard M. Prass, Buffalo Grove, IL
- Cantor Ari Priven, New York, NY
- Rabbi James Prosnit, Bridgeport, CT
- Cantor Steven Puzarne, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Arnold I. Rachlis, Irvine, CA
- Rabbi Larry Raphael, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Rayzel Robinson Raphael, Melrose Park, PA
- Rabbi Debra Rappaport, Avon, CO
- Rabbi Matthew A. Reimer, Short Hills, NJ
- Rabbi Victor Hillel Reinstein, Jamaica Plain, MA
- Cantor David E. Reinwald, Olympia Fields, IL
- Rabbi Joel Rembaum, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Michael M. Remson, Kenosha, WI
- Rabbi Steven Carr Reuben, Pacific Palisades, CA
- Rabbinical Student Silona Ruth Reyman, Chico, CA
- Cantor Stephen Richards, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
- Rabbi Dorothy A. Richman, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Yael B. Ridberg, New York, NY
- Rabbi Moti Rieber, Wichita, KS
- Rabbi Louis Rieser, Windham, NH
- Rabbi Daniel A. Roberts, Orange Village, OH
- Rabbi Rochelle Robins, San Diego, CA
- Cantor Bruce Rockman, North Brunswick, NJ
- Cantor Sue Roemer, Silver Spring, MD
- Cantor Charles D. Romalis, Wayne, NJ
- Rabbi Norman T. Roman, West Bloomfield, MI
- Rabbi Yael Romer, Kingston, NY
- Cantor Annie Rose, Ann Arbor, MI
- Rabbi Dawn Rose, Lowell, MA
- Rabbi Joshua Rose, Boulder, CO
- Rabbi Kliel Rose, Miami Beach, FL
- Rabbi Or Rose, Jamaica Plain, MA
- Rabbinical Student Anna Rosen, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbi Brant Rosen, Evanston, IL
- Cantor Chanin Rosen, Tarrytown, NY
- Rabbinical Student Derek Rosenbaum, Richboro, PA
- Rabbi Aaron P. Rosenberg, Waterford, CT
- Rabbi Ari Rosenberg, Great Barrington, MA
- Rabbi James Bruce Rosenberg, Barrington, RI
- Rabbinical Student Matthew Todd Rosenberg, Sherman Oaks, CA
- Cantor Aviva Rosenbloom, Altadena, CA
- Rabbi Joseph Rosenbloom, St. Louis, MO
- Rabbinic Student Yiskah Rosenfeld, Albany, CA
- Rabbi Jennie Rosenn, New York, NY
- Rabbinical Student Ken Rosenstein, Boston, MA
- Cantor Donn Rosensweig, Andover, MD
- Rabbi John L. Rosove, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Dennis S. Ross, Worcester, MA
- Rabbinical Student Michael Steven Ross, Phoenixville, PA
- Rabbinical Student Amy T. Rossel, Gig Harbor, WA
- Rabbi Donald B. Rossoff, Morristown, NJ
- Rabbi Julie Lynn Roth, Princeton, NJ
- Rabbi Sandy Roth, New Hope, PA
- Rabbi Michael Rothbaum, Purchase, NY
- Cantor Judith Kahan Rowland, New York, NY
- Rabbi Eliseo D. Rozenwasser, Penn Valley, PA
- Rabbi Jonathan Rubenstein, Saratoga Springs, NY
- Rabbi Steven Rubenstein, West Bloomfield, MI
- Cantorial Student Michael Rubin, Columbia, SC
- Rabbi Sarah Niebuhr Rubin, Keene, NH
- Rabbi Gila Ruskin, Baltimore, MD
- Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Elissa Sachs-Kohen, Baltimore, MD
- Rabbi Andrew M. Sacks, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Steven Sager, Durham, NC
- Rabbi Jared H. Saks, Minneapolis, MN
- Rabbi Robert Saks, University Park, MD
- Rabbinic Student Jan Salzman, N. Pomfret, VT
- Rabbi Regina L. Sandler-Phillips, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi David Fox Sandmel, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Marna Sapsowitz, Olympia, WA
- Rabbi Michael Satz, Cherry Hill, NJ
- Rabbi Scott Saulson, Atlanta, GA
- Cantor Pamela Sawyer, Alameda, CA
- Rabbi Jeffrey S. Saxe, Falls Church, VA
- Rabbi Julie Saxe-Taller, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Herman Schaalman, Chicago, IL
- Cantor Wally Schachet-Briskin, Los Angeles, CA
- Cantor Hollis Suzanne Schachner, Wayland, MA
- Rabbi Zalman M. Schachter-Shalomi, Boulder, CO
- Rabbi Phil Schechter, Stamford, CT
- Rabbi Rick Schechter, Glendale, CA
- Rabbi Jeffrey Lee Schein, Shaker Heights, OH
- Cantor Robert S. Scherr, Williamstown, MA
- Cantor Pamela Schiffer, Bloomfield Hills, MI
- Cantor Benjie Schiller, New York, NY
- Rabbi Judith Schindler, Charlotte, NC
- Rabbi George Schlesinger, Santa Rosa, CA
- Rabbi Sara Leya Schley, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Janine Carol Schloss, Seattle, WA
- Cantor Randall Schloss, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Howie Leib Schneider, Aptos, CA
- Cantor Neil Schnitzer, Cherry Hill, NJ
- Cantor Sunny Schnitzer, Bethesda, MD
- Rabbi Rachel Schoenfeld, Allston, MA
- Rabbi Ismar Schorsch, New York, NY
- Rabbi Robert David Schreibman, Northfield, IL
- Cantor Eric Schulmiller, Port Washington, NY
- Rabbi Marvin Schwab, Santa Fe, NM
- Rabbi Arthur Lawrence Schwartz, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
- Rabbi Barry L. Schwartz, Cherry Hill, NJ
- Rabbi Jeremy Schwartz, Willimantic, CT
- Rabbi Julie S. Schwartz, Atlanta, GA
- Cantor Richard Schwartz, Culver City, CA
- Rabbi Sid Schwarz, Rockville, MD
- Rabbi Peter Schweitzer, New York, NY
- Rabbi Adrienne Pollock Scott, Houston, TX
- Rabbi Allen Secher, Whitefish, MT
- Cantor Lisa Verona Segal, Miami, FL
- Rabbi Steve Segar, University Heights, OH
- Rabbi Judith Seid, Pleasanton, CA
- Rabbi Jonathan Seidel, Eugene, OR
- Rabbi Jerry Seidler, Baltimore, MD
- Rabbi Ahud Sela, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Bruce Bromberg Seltzer, Northampton, MA
- Rabbi Joel Seltzer, Providence, RI
- Rabbi David R. Senter, Pompton Lakes, NJ
- Rabbi Sanford Seltzer, Boston, MA
- Rabbi Daniel A. Septimus, Seattle, WA
- Cantor Inna Serebro-Litvak, Randolph, NJ
- Cantor David Serkin-Poole, Bellevue, WA
- Rabbi Gerald Serotta, Chevy Chase, MD
- Rabbi Isaac Serotta, Highland Park, IL
- Rabbi Drorah O. Setel, Buffalo, NY
- Rabbinical Student Lorenna Russell Shalev, Santa Fe, NM
- Rabbi Judy Shanks, Lafayette, CA
- Rabbi E. Noach Shapiro, Montclair, NJ
- Rabbi Mark Dov Shapiro, Springfield, MA
- Rabbi Bonnie Sharfman, Scottsdale, AZ
- Rabbinical Student Shira Shazeer, Natick, MA
- Cantor Yaakov Shechter, New York, NY
- Rabbi Aaron Sherman, Cedar Rapids, IA
- Rabbinical Student Philip Sherman, Brookline, MA
- Cantor Robbi Sherwin, Austin, TX
- Rabbi Daniel Shevitz, Venice, CA
- Cantor Linda Shivers, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Paul Shleffar, Emerald Hills, CA
- Rabbi David Shneyer, Rockville, MD
- Cantor Jacqueline L. Shuchat-Marx, Manalapan, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Andy Shugerman, New York, NY
- Rabbi Kenneth Shuster, Forest Hills, NY
- Rabbi Alexandria Shuval-Weiner, Leawood, KS
- Rabbi Burt Aaron Siegel, New York, NY
- Rabbi Howard Siegel, Houston, TX
- Rabbi Michael S. Siegel, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Jodie Siff, Plandome, NY
- Cantor Paul Cyril Silbersher, Prairie Village, KS
- Rabbinical Student Michael Israel Silbert, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Hanan Sills, Eugene, OR
- Cantor Ben F. Silver, Waltham, MA
- Rabbinical Student Jack B. Silver, Scottsdale, AZ
- Rabbinical Student Ariana J. Silverman, New York, NY
- Rabbi Susan Silverman, Chevel Eilot, Israel
- Rabbinical Student Becky Silverstein, Watertown, MA
- Rabbi Steve Silvern, Auburn, AL
- Cantor Murray E. Simon, Princeton, NJ
- Rabbi Richard Simon, Westhampton, NJ
- Rabbinical Student David Singer, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Suzanne Singer, Riverside, CA
- Rabbi Jeffrey J. Sirkman, Larchmont, NY
- Rabbi Eric J. Siroka, South Bend, IN
- Cantor Shirah Sklar, Norwalk, CT
- Rabbi Andrew R. Sklarz, Abington, PA
- Cantor Barbara Slader, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Jonathan P. Slater, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY
- Rabbi Arnie Sleutelberg, Troy, MI
- Rabbi Amy Joy Small, Summit, NJ
- Cantor Judy Sofer, Pasadena, CA
- Rabbinical Student Matthew Soffer, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Joel E. Soffin, New York, NY
- Rabbi Ruth Sohn, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbi Myra Soifer, Reno, NV
- Rabbi Felicia Sol, New York, NY
- Rabbi Bradley Solmsen, West Roxbury, MA
- Rabbi Rav A. Soloff, Lansdale, PA
- Rabbinical Student Alyson Solomon, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Eric Solomon, Raleigh, NC
- Rabbi Jennifer Solomon, Raleigh, NC
- Rabbi Marc W. Soloway, Boulder, CO
- Rabbi Phyllis Anna Sommer, Glencoe, IL
- Cantor Kerith Spencer-Shapiro, Leonia, NJ
- Rabbi David S. Sperling, New York, NY
- Rabbi Scott M. Sperling, Washington, DC
- Rabbi Aaron Spiegel, Indianapolis, IN
- Rabbi Adam Stock Spilker, St. Paul, MN
- Rabbi Jonathan Spira-Savett, Nashua, NH
- Rabbi Toba Spitzer, West Newton, MA
- Rabbinical Student Ed Stafman, Tallahassee, FL
- Cantor Howard M. Stahl, Short Hills, NJ
- Rabbi Joshua Stampfer, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Jacob Staub, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Linda K. Steigman, Overland Park, KS
- Rabbinical Student Adam Frank Stein, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbinical Student Howard Stein, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbi Israel Chaim Stein, Bridgeport, CT
- Rabbi Margot Stein, Bala Cynwyd, PA
- Rabbi Peter W. Stein, Cranston, RI
- Rabbi Bonnie Ann Steinberg, New Hyde Park, NY
- Rabbi Naomi Steinberg, Carlotta, CA
- Rabbi Steven Steinberg, Cheshire, CT
- Rabbi Gershon Steinberg-Caudill, El Cerrito, CA
- Rabbi David Stern, Dallas, TX
- Rabbi Elizabeth Weiss Stern, Cambridge, MA
- Rabbi George M. Stern, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Keith Stern, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Michael Sternfield, Chicago, IL
- Rabbinical Student Kaya Stern-Kaufman, Housatonic, MA
- Rabbi Michael N. Stevens, Munster, IN
- Rabbi Sharon Stiefel, Minneapolis, MN
- Rabbi Debbie Stiel, Topeka, KS
- Rabbi Jeffrey Barry Stiffman, St. Louis, MO
- Rabbi Ariel Stone, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Ira F. Stone, Philadelpha, PA
- Rabbi Andrew F. Straus, Tempe, AZ
- Rabbi Joshua Strom, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi William M. Strongin, New Paltz, NY
- Rabbi Shira Stutman, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Leah Sudran, Petaluma, CA
- Cantor Jodi Lee Sufrin, Wellesley, MA
- Rabbi Alvin M. Sugarman, Atlanta, GA
- Rabbi Yaffa-Shira Sultan, San Diego, CA
- Rabbi Jeff Sultar, Penn Valley, PA
- Rabbi Elon Sunshine, Scottsdale, AZ
- Rabbi Alana Suskin, Gaithersburg, MD
- Rabbinical Student Barry A. Swan, Rochester, NY
- Rabbi Robert P. Tabak, Melrose Park, PA
- Rabbi Larry Tabick, London, England
- Rabbi Susan Talve, Saint Louis, MO
- Cantor Deborah Tanzer-Cohen, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Joshua Taub, Saint Louis, MO
- Cantor Elliot Taubman, Block Island, RI
- Rabbi Dov Taylor, Highland Park, IL
- Rabbi Michael Z.P. Tayvah, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Jay TelRav, Denver, CO
- Rabbi Vill S. Tepper, Chattanooga, TN
- Rabbi Elliott Tepperman, Montclair, NJ
- Rabbi David Teutsch, Wyncote, PA
- Rabbi David Leipziger Teva, East Hampton, CT
- Rabbi David B. Thomas, Sudbury, MA
- Cantor Rica Julie Timman, Crestwood, NY
- Rabbinical Student Rachel Timoner, Los Angeles, CA
- Rabbinical Student Janet Shifrah Tobacman, Emeryville, CA
- Rabbi Robert Tobin, Kansas City, MO
- Cantor Rosalie Toubes, Brookline, MA
- Cantor Louise Treitman, Lexington, MA
- Rabbi Leo Trepp, San Rafael, CA
- Rabbi Gordon Tucker, White Plains, NY
- Cantor Drew Tulchin, Washington, DC
- Cantor Arlyne Unger, Huntingdon Valley, PA
- Rabbinical Student David Z. Vaisberg, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbinical Student Lila Veissid, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Burton L. Visotzky, New York, NY
- Cantor Aaron Vitells, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Andrew D. Vogel, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Heidi Waldmann, Carmel, IN
- Rabbi Moshe Waldoks, Newton, MA
- Rabbi Brian Walt, West Tisbury, MA
- Cantor William Walton, Montclair, NJ
- Rabbi Bruce Samuel Warshal, Hillsboro Beach, FL
- Rabbi Susan Warshaw, Berlin, MD
- Rabbi Arthur Waskow, Philadlephia, PA
- Rabbi Mira Beth Wasserman, Bloomington, IN
- Rabbi Pamela J. Wax, New York, NY
- Rabbinical Student Seth Wax, Brookline, MA
- Rabbi Deborah Waxman, Wyncote, PA
- Rabbi Joshua Waxman, Fort Washington, PA
- Rabbi Donald A. Weber, Marlboro, NJ
- Rabbi Nancy Wechsler-Azen, Carmichael, CA
- Rabbi Elyse Wechterman, Attleboro, MA
- Cantor Susan Wehle, Amherst, NY
- Rabbi Sheila Peltz Weinberg, Amherst, MA
- Cantor Alan Weiner, Valley Village, CA
- Rabbi Daniel A. Weiner, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Herbert Weiner, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Scott B. Weiner, New York, NY
- Rabbnincal Student Aaron Samuel Weininger, New York, NY
- Rabbi Jay H. Weinstein, Syosset, NY
- Rabbi Melissa Weintraub, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Simkha Y. Weintraub, Brooklyn, NY
- Rabbi Mimi Weisel, Berkeley, CA
- Rabbi Andrea L. Weiss, Bala Cnwyd, PA
- Rabbi Lewis J. Weiss, Indianapolis, IN
- Rabbi Max W. Weiss, Hoffman Estates, IL
- Rabbi Zari M. Weiss, Seattle, WA
- Rabbi Shifra Weiss-Penzias, Aptos, CA
- Rabbi Joseph S. Weizenbaum, Tucson, AZ
- Rabbi Margaret Moers Wenig, New York, NY
- Rabbi Scott White, Prairie Village, KS
- Rabbi Nancy H. Wiener, New York, NY
- Rabbi Shohama Wiener, New Rochelle, NY
- Rabbi David Wilfond, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Aryeh Wineman, Northampton, MA
- Rabbi David Wilfond, Jerusalem, Israel
- Rabbi Avi Winokur, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, z"l, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Joseph Wolf, Portland, OR
- Rabbi Sarah Wolf, Los Altos Hills, CA
- Rabbi Greg Wolfe, Davis, CA
- Rabbi Peretz Wolf-Prusan, San Francisco, CA
- Rabbi Carl Wolkin, Northbrook, IL
- Rabbi Jonathan S. Woll, Glen Rock, NJ
- Cantor Ross Wolman, Wilmette, IL
- Rabbinical Student Elizabeth Wood, Cincinnati, OH
- Rabbinical Student Eric Woodward, New York, NY
- Rabbi Bridget Wynne, El Cerrito, CA
- Cantor Gregory Yaroslow, San Bernardino, CA
- Rabbi Moshe Yehudai, Raanana, Israel
- Cantor Natalie Miriam Young, Plantation, FL
- Cantor Julie Lynn Yugend-Green, Oak Park, IL
- Rabbi Sara Zacharia, Newton Centre, MA
- Rabbi Elana Zaiman, Seattle, WA
- Cantor Lorel Ellen Zar-Kessler, Sudbury, MA
- Rabbi David Zaslow, Ashland, OR
- Rabbi Elaine S. Zecher, Boston, MA
- Rabbi Michael Zedek, Chicago, IL
- Rabbi Adam Zeff, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbinical Student Ziona Zelazo, Franklin Lakes, NJ
- Cantor Sarah Zemel, New Rochelle, NY
- Rabbi Irwin A. Zeplowitz, Port Washington, NY
- Rabbi Lina N. Zerbarini, New Haven, CT
- Rabbi Shawn Israel Zevit, Philadelphia, PA
- Rabbi Laurie Zimmerman, Madison, WI
- Rabbi Ruth Zlotnick Washington Township, NJ
- Rabbinical Student Rain Zohav, Rockville, MD
- Rabbi Henry A. Zoob, Westwood, MA
- Rabbi David J. Zucker, Aurora, CO
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is a
"mutually-acceptable two-state solution"?
A two-state solution refers
to a sovereign Palestinian state, living alongside Israel in peace. Such a
solution has roots in the founding of Israel -- which was predicated on the
1947 UN decision to partition the land between its Jewish and Arab inhabitants
-- and would allow each people to meet its nationalist goals without demanding
the surrender of the other.
But for any solution to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict to be viable, it will have to be
mutually-acceptable to both sides. Any unilateral decision making, such as the
notion that Israel might unilaterally withdraw from certain areas of the West
Bank and declare its borders final, has no real chance of succeeding. Both
sides must acknowledge and respect the needs of the other, without denying the
legitimate needs of their own people.
How does the envoy requested differ from the envoys President Bush appointed
during his tenure? How is it different from the role of Secretary of State
attempting to mediate any deeply-felt conflict will have to, at turns, cajole
and demand, entice and push -- the resolution of decades or centuries of
conflict cannot be achieved without difficult compromise, and that compromise
is what the diplomat is there to attain. For such mediation to prove
successful, any envoy will have to have the trust of all parties, as well as
commanding their respect. Finally, such a diplomat will have to be able to
function on a number of fronts and just under the radar, if need be, in order
to keep sensitive information and developments under wraps until all sides are
ready to reveal details.
appointed by President Bush tended to be focused entirely on one area of
expertise (such as Retired Marine General James Jones, or Retired Marine
General Anthony Zinni), and generally failed to command the attention and
respect necessary to achieve change. A successful envoy will have both an
independent presence on the world stage -- such as a former President or an
internationally renowned diplomat -- as well as having the undivided attention
of the President he or she serves.
of State is thus not an "envoy," per se, but rather an official and
very public representative of the U.S. government. One reason the Secretary of
State is not in the best position to perform delicate mediation is that it is
all but impossible for a government official to avoid the spotlight, no matter
the Administration. In terms of Secretary Rice specifically, while it is clear
that she has President Bush's respect, it is not as clear that he was willing
to listen to her ideas or support them internationally -- witness the
Rice-brokered Israeli-Palestinian transport deal of 2005, which was announced
with great fanfare and immediately sunk into obscurity.
3. To what
does "eight years of half-hearted diplomacy” refer? How can the next
President provide “effective American leadership for peace”?
The Bush Administration was
characterized, first, by an absolute unwillingness to engage with the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and later by repeated efforts to achieve
dramatic results after seven years of neglect with very little effort. In the
words of Aaron David Miller, a career diplomat who spent 20 years on the
frontlines of Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking, President Bush "[has had]
many 'if I do this on the peace process, don't bother me again' moments."
[note: see The Much Too Promised Land, Aaron David Miller].
In 2001, then-Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon flatly rejected President Bush's demands that a massive Israeli
military operation on the West Bank be suspended "as quickly as
possible"; in 2003, Sharon and Yasser Arafat signed the U.S.-backed Road
Map to Peace, committing themselves to an immediate settlement freeze and
containment of terrorism, but Israel continued to build settlements and
nothing substantive changed in Palestinian security; in 2005, the
Rice-brokered transport agreement was signed and ignored; in 2007, Bush
announced at the Annapolis peace conference that his goal was an agreement by
the end of his administration, but the talks netted little progress. And yet,
at least with regard to Israel, the Bush Administration has not made serious
efforts to back the President's words with actions, or create consequences for
the regular disregard of promises made to the U.S. government.
For the next President to be
effective, he will have to learn from these mistakes. For U.S. diplomatic
efforts to succeed, they must be backed by an iron-clad commitment to the
process that diplomacy involves. Mediation is a thankless task, until it is
successful -- the next President will have to be willing to do the hard,
occasionally unpopular work necessary, in order to achieve a just and durable
resolution of the conflict.
Furthermore, it must be made
absolutely clear to both parties that agreements signed and promises made are
not to be taken lightly: Refusal to abide by accepted terms will bring
unpleasant consequences, but progress will bring rewards.
4. Why is it
so urgent to resolve the conflict at this time?
Israeli and Palestinian
frustration with the utter lack of progress in negotiations is at an all-time
high. Influential figures on both sides have begun to publicly lose faith in
the process. It may well be that the next Administration will be the last to
have a real opportunity to truly resolve the conflict.
Why is the U.S. so important to the peace process?
success in the realm of Israeli-Arab negotiations has been with American
involvement. The peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan were mediated by
Presidents Carter and Clinton; the Madrid Peace Conference, the first time
Israel sat down with the gathered Arab nations, came about under the
administration of President George H.W. Bush. Even the Israeli-Palestinian
Declaration of Principles (DOP), ostensibly achieved without American
involvement, were negotiated with the United States in mind -- to the extent
that then-Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres suggested to then-Secretary of
State Warren Christopher that the latter take credit for the achievement.
all the upheavals in the world over the past twenty years, the United States
remains the world's one superpower -- and it has always served as Israel's
most stalwart ally. The Palestinians and Arab nations look to the U.S. as a
path to Israel and look to Israel as a path to better relations with the U.S.
For all these reasons, if any peace agreement is to succeed, it will require
complete American support.
How can the President encourage the negotiation of a two-state solution when
Hamas is still in control of the Gaza Strip?
with Israel are conducted not by the Palestinian Authority, per se, but by the
chairman of the PLO, who is Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas is a
long-time moderate who has been calling for a two-state solution since 1988;
it is with Abbas that Israel and the U.S. are conducting all negotiation
that Hamas rules the Gaza Strip is undeniably problematic, however; any
agreement Abbas achieves with Israel will only be successful if the majority
of the Palestinian people stand behind it. If the nation is, in fact,
split into two geographical and ideological camps, this won’t be possible.
some members of the Hamas leadership have indicated a certain openness to a
peace deal with Israel; they would accept an agreement, if approved in a
national referendum. Hamas has also maintained its current ceasefire with
Israel (if failing to crack down on militants from other groups who have
failed to respect the truce), and is negotiating over the release of captured
Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Both of these facts indicate a pragmatism which
could be made to serve the interests of peace.
Hamas’s most extremist policies are rejected by a majority of Palestinians,
it cannot be denied that the movement holds an enormous amount of power on the
Palestinian political scene. Bottom line, for peace talks to succeed, the U.S.
will also have to work to close the gap between Fatah, the movement headed by
Abbas, and Hamas.
7. What about Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert's August 2008 peace offer to the Palestinians?
Palestinians rejected Olmert’s offer as soon as it was made public as it did
not adequately address most of the issues that are most important to the
Palestinians: the status of Jerusalem, the status of refugees, and the issue
of territorial contiguity on the West Bank. Rather, Olmert suggested an
Israeli withdrawal from 93% of the West Bank, with a compensation in the form
of land in the desert on the border of the Gaza Strip.
By signing this open letter,
you agree to allow Brit Tzedek v’Shalom to publicize your name in pre and
post-election publicity and paid advertising. Your signature on this
letter indicates support for the contents of the letter and does not
constitute your agreement with all of the positions of Brit Tzedek v’Shalom.
You may give us your general endorsement for our work by joining our rabbinic
cabinet. To join, please contact
Rabbi John Friedman.
The post-election version of
the letter will be changed as follows:
It will be addressed to President-Elect X.
In the last paragraph the High Holidays language will be dropped and the
remaining text will read “We urge you to commit yourself to effective
American leadership for peace.”
In the fourth paragraph, "As Jewish clergy..." may be changed
to "As American leaders...".
It is all set up,
this temporary little flesh kingdom of Satan. The Liar Lawyers and Judges and
officers of the kings court have already destroyed this nations sovereign
independence. They attorn for their king Lucifer
the sons of the shem-a-GOG of Satan
Mt:22:35: Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,
36: Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37: Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38: This is the first and great commandment.
39: And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
41: While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,
42: Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David.
43: He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,
44: The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
45: If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
46: And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.
Lk:7:30: But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized of him.
31: And the Lord said, Whereunto then shall I liken the men of this generation? and to what are they like?
32: They are like unto children sitting in the marketplace, and calling one to another, and saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned to you, and ye have not wept.
33: For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and ye say, He hath a devil.
34: The Son of man is come eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!
35: But wisdom is justified of all her children.
Lk:10:25: And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
26: He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27: And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28: And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
29: But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?
30: And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.
31: And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.
32: And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.
33: But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,
34: And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.
35: And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.
36: Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
37: And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.
Lk:11:45: Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also.
46: And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
47: Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.
48: Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres.
49: Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute:
50: That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;
51: From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
52: Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
53: And as he said these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to urge him vehemently, and to provoke him to speak of many things:
54: Laying wait for him, and seeking to catch something out of his mouth, that they might accuse him.
Lk:11:46: And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
Lk:11:52: Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
Lk:14:3: And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?
Upon seizing the reins of government, the
new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.
... Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade
PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.
Jewish courts ... will be granted full
legal sovereignty over Jewish citiwzens within each country, who will no
longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts.
The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts
will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code
will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....
.... And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment
of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. —
Committee for Israeli Victory]
Freemasonry is subordinate to Judaism, according to Craig
author of Blood
On The Altar: The Secret History of the World's Most Dangerous Secret
Is Freemasonry Judaism for gentiles? As early as 926 AD, evidence suggests
"1738 is a date to remember. It truly marks the formation of
modern Freemasonry and the organization of the grand lodges. It was the
year the Book of Constitutions was revised to carry a Protestant meaning
and when Article I of this text was altered. In its new form it echoes the
charter allegedly issued by Edwin
I in 926: 'A mason is obliged by
his tenure to observe the moral law like a true Noachid...and
to the three great articles of Noah,' to wit, the prohibition on
worshipping idols and false gods, and committing blasphemy and
murder." (Paul Naudon, "The Secrets of the Freemasonry: Its
Origins and Connection to the Knights Templar, 1991, Inner Traditions,
Rochester, Vermont, page 261)
"For the good of Masonry, generally, but for the
Jewish nation in particular. Royal Arch Degree of
Freemasonry" -- quoted from Craig Heimbichner's
book Blood on the Altar, page 83. Pictured here is the Masonic
Jewel, Royal Arch, 7th Degree rite in which York Rite
Freemasons pledge allegiance to the Jewish nation. The Masonic
jewell of this rite is Solomon's Seal with a sun blazing
inside a triange in the center.
That Freemasonry is Judaism for Gentiles, or Noachidism, can be further
confirmed by referring to Judeo-Freemasonry's own reference books: "Noachidae,
Noachites. The descendents of Noah. A term applied to Freemasons. Noah
having alone preserved the true name and worship of God, amid a race of
impious idolaters. Freemasons claim to be his descendents, because they
still preserve that pure religion which distinguished this second father
of the human race from the rest of the world. And even when his
descendents began again, in the plains of Shinar, to forget the Almighty,
and to wander from the path of purity, the principles of Noah were still
perpetuated by that portion of his race whom the Freemasons of the present
day regard as their early predecessors. Hence, Freemasons call themselves
Noachidae, or the sons of Noah." (Mackey, Lexicon of
Freemasonry, page 324, 2004, Barnes and Noble Publishing, Inc.)
"Noah, Precepts of. The precepts of the patriarch Noah,
which were preserved as the constitutions of our ancient brethren, are
seven in number, and are as follows: 1. Renounce all idols 2. Worship the
only true God. 3. Commit no murder. 4. Be not defiled by incest. 5. Do not
steal. 6. Be just. 7. Eat no flesh with blood in it. The 'proselytes of
the gate', as the Jews termed those who lived among them without
undergoing circumcision, or observing the ceremonial law, were bound to
obey the seven precepts of Noah." (Mackey, Lexicon of
Freemasonry, page 325, 2004, Barnes and Noble Publishing, Inc.)
"NOAHCHIDAE: The descendants of Noah, and the transmitters
of his religious dogmas, which were the unity of God and the immortality
of the soul. The name has from the earliest times been bestowed upon the
Freemasons, who teach the same doctrines. Thus in the 'old charges,' as
quoted by Anderson (Const. edit. 1738, p. 143), it is said, 'A mason is
obliged by his tenure to observe the moral law as a true Noachidae." (The
Symbolism of Freemasonry, Mackey, available at the on-line religious
As the quotes above attest, Judeo-Freemasons are -- and arguably were
from the inception of Freemasonry -- Noahchidae, i.e., outsiders at the
gate who follow the 7 laws laid down by the Rabbis in the Talmud for
The seven Noachide Laws may sound harmless enough if read out of the
context of their origin within the Talmudic-Kabbalistic praxis from whence
they originated, but in his book "Judaism Discovered", Hoffman
clarifies: "The Noachide set-up is above all a legal system
which will eventually develop courts and judiciary with the power to
impose capital punishment for grievous infringements of the Noachide Laws.
One death penalty offense under the Noahide rabbinic legal system is 'idolotry.'
Since Maimonides ruled that Christians are idolaters, it is not difficult
to see that the 102nd US Congress, and the numerous churchmen who promote
submission to the "Noachide" Laws, wittingly or unwittingly,
have laid the groundwork for the execution, at some future date, of
authentic Christians, individually by trial or en masse. conversely,
Maimonides rules that all gentiles who are not followers of the Noachide
Law are liable to death. Hilchot Melachim 8:10 states that any gentile who
does not accept the Noachide laws should be slain, though this only
applies when Judaics have 'undisputed authority over eretz Israel.'" (Michael
A. Hoffman, "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical
Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit", page 498,
Independent History and Research, 2008, available, as of 2008, at revisionisthistory.org.)
That Freemasons, according to their own books, admit to being
Noahchidae is only one among many reasons why many Masonologists claim
Freemasonry is Judaism for Gentiles. Other reasons include the following:
1) Freemasonry, according the the occult heavyweights and Freemasons who
spearheaded the occult revival of the 19th and 20th century agree that Freemasonry
is based on the Jewish Kabbalah; 2) The most common symbols of
Freemasonry are synonyms
of the Seal of Solomon, or the hexagram, which is the accepted
symbol of the Jewish Nation and Judaism, thus suggesting emblematically
what is stated verbally here; 3) Masons of the Royal Arch Degree of
Templar Rite Masonry take an oath to the nation of Jews, and the jewel of
that degree is a hexagram with a sun in the center; 4) the rituals of
Freemasonry revolve around the rebuilding of the Temple of Solomon:
"Take from Freemasonry its dependence upon the temple [of
Solomon], leave out of its ritual all reference to that sacred
edifice, and to the legends connected with it, and the system [of
Freemasonry] itself must at once decay and die".
(Albert Mackey, The Symbolism of Freemasonry [Brackets mine]) As
if these reasons were not sufficient in themselves to establish the fact
that Freemasonry is Judaism for Gentiles, we here have Freemasons
telling us that they are called Noahchides, i.e., gentiles who submit the
Talmudic Noahide laws.
Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First
War until he was severely wounded in 1916 - thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and
War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war.
1920 he became a Member of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard. In 1931 he was elected
Member of Parliament for Midlothian and Peeblesshire.
under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without
or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. On the
morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there
the end of that Parliament in 1945.
is the story that people have said would never be written in our time — the
of events leading up to the Second World War, told by one who enjoyed the
and confidence of Mr. Neville Chamberlain during the critical months
Munich and September, 1939.
has long been an unofficial ban on books dealing with what Captain Ramsay
"The Nameless War", the conflict which has been waged from behind
for centuries, which is still being waged and of which very few are aware.
publishers of "The Nameless War" believe this latest exposure will
do more than
previous attempt to break the conspiracy of silence.
present work, with much additional evidence and a fuller historical
outcome of the personal experiences of a public figure who in the course of
discovered at first-hand the existence of a centuries old conspiracy against
and the whole of Christendom.
Nameless War" reveals an unsuspected link between all the major
— from King Charles I's time to the abortive attempt against Spain in 1936.
source of inspiration, design and supply is shown to be common to all of them.
revolutions and the World War of 1939 are seen to be integral parts of one and
same master plan.
a brief review of the forces behind the declaration of war and the world wide
of many who endeavoured to oppose them, the author describes the anatomy
the Revolutionary International machine — the machine which today continues
for supranational world power, the age-old Messianic dream of International
is the author's belief that the machine would break down without the support
Jews and unsuspecting Gentiles and he puts forward suggestions for
say . . .
Ramsay, a Christian gentleman of unflagging courage, believed that the
with Germany was not conceived in the interests of Britain and could lead
to the extension of Communist and Jewish power. Because he warned his
countrymen of the forces at work, he was put in prison without trial for four
a half years, for 'reasons' so preposterous that those who framed them
not submit them to a court of law." Truth
years Captain Ramsay had been a member of the British Parliament. His
is an analysis of the Jewish-Zionist war against Christian civilization."
and the Flag
say . . .
is no limit to the depths of human depravity, Captain Maule Ramsay . . .
to have made a very determined attempt to plumb those depths." The
publication of such a book, at this time, underlines the urgent need for the
to be reformed so as to make it a crime to preach racial hatred or publish
on groups in the community." The Daily Worker
1952; First Edition October 1952;
Popular Edition 1956;
Popular Edition 1956;
Popular Edition 1962;
and Printed in Great Britain by
B.P.S. Printing Co.
Published by the Britons Publishing Company
Westbourne Grove, London, W.2
of Revolutionary Technique
Bells The Cat
Jewry Declares War
War" Ended by Civilian Bombing
Shape of Things to Come
Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament
- Reasons Given For Arrest
1 A Appendix
2 A Appendix
3 A Appendix
4 A Appendix
5 A Appendix
the memory of those Patriots who in 1215 at Runnymede
Magna Carta and those who in 1320 at Arbroath
the Declaration of Independence this book is
I banished the Jews from England for many grave offences endangering the
of his realm and lieges, which were to a great extent indicated in the
Jewry*, enacted by his Parliament in 1290, the Commons playing a prominent
See Appendix 2 (Appendices follow the last chapter)
King of France very shortly followed suit, as did other Rulers in Christian
grave did the situation for the Jews in Europe become, that an urgent appeal
and advice was addressed by them to the Sanhedrin, then located at
appeal was sent over the signature of Chemor, Rabbi of Arles in Provence, on
January, 1489. The reply came in November, 1489, which was issued over the
of V.S.S. V.F.F. Prince of the Jews.
advised the Jews of Europe to adopt the tactics of the Trojan Horse; to make
sons Christian priests, lawyers, doctors, etc., and work to destroy the
structure from within.
first notable repercussion to this advice occurred in Spain in the reign of
and Isabella. Many Jews were by then enrolled as Christians, but remaining
Jews were working to destroy the Christian church in Spain.
grave became the menace finally, that the Inquisition was instituted in an
to cleanse the country from these conspirators. Once again the Jews were
to commence an exodus from yet another country, whose hospitality they
eastwards, these Jews joined other Jewish communities in western Europe;
numbers flowed on to Holland and Switzerland.
now on these two countries were to become active centres of Jewish intrigue.
however, has always needed a powerful seafaring nation to which to attach
Britain, newly united under James I, was a rising naval power, which was
beginning to sway the four corners of the discovered world. Here also there
a wonderful field for disruptive criticism; for although it was a Christian
yet it was one most sharply divided as between Protestant and Catholic.
campaign for exploiting this division and fanning hatreds between the
was soon in process of organization. How well the Jews succeeded in
campaign in Britain may be judged from the fact that one of the earliest acts
creature and hireling Oliver Cromwell — after executing the King according
— was to allow the Jews free access to England once more.
was fated that England should be the first of a series of Revolutions, which
these cryptic words Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl of Beaconsfield,
his two volume life of Charles I published in 1851. A work of astonishing
and insight, much information for which, he states, was obtained from the
of one Melchior de Salom, French envoy in England during that period.
scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom based upon
its own ancient traditions; these sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State,
and the people in one solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the
rumblings of Calvinism.
who came to Geneva from France, where his name was spelt Cauin, *possibly
French effort to spell Cohen, organized great numbers of revolutionary
orators, not a
of whom were inflicted upon England and Scotland. Thus was laid the groundwork
revolution under a cloak of religious fervour.
At a B'nai B'rith meeting in Paris reported in 'Catholic Gazette' in Feb
he was claimed to be of Jewish extraction.
both sides of the Tweed these demagogues contracted all religion into rigid
of the "Sabbath." To use the words of Isaac Disraeli,
nation was artfully divided into Sabbatarians and Sabbath breakers."
deemed the Sabbath to have been a Jewish ordinance, limited to the
goes on to say that when these Calvinists held the country in their power,
seemed that religion chiefly consisted of Sabbatarian rigours; and that a
senate had been transformed into a company of Hebrew Rabbins":
1650, after the execution of the King, an Act was passed inflicting penalties
a breach of the Sabbath."
Strafford and Laud are the three chief figures round the King in these
stages: Men on whose loyalty to himself, the nation, and the ancient tradition
the trusted friend of King James I, and of those who had saved his life at
time of the Gowrie Conspiracy (of ominous cabalistic associations) was
in the early years of King Charles' reign under mysterious
who had been in his early days inclined to follow the opposite faction, later
them; and became a staunch and devoted adherent of the King.
opposition faction became steadily more hostile to Charles and by the time
were led by Pym and decided to impeach Strafford. "The King," writes
this faction as his enemies"; and he states that the head of this faction
Earl of Bedford.
the eminent Catholic historian, states that a Jew wine merchant named
was the founder of this family in Tudor times. With the impeachment and
of Strafford, the powers behind the rising Calvinist, or Cohenist, Conspiracy
to reveal themselves, and their focus, the City of London.
this time there suddenly began to appear from the City armed mobs of
medieval equivalent for "workers" no doubt). Let me quote Disraeli:
were said to amount to ten thousand ...
war-like weapons. It was a militia for insurgency at all seasons, and might
depended upon for any work of destruction at the cheapest rate ...
these sallied forth with daggers and bludgeons (from the city) the inference
that this train of explosion must have been long laid."
must indeed; and we must recollect here, that at this time Strafford was still
and civil war in the minds of none but of those behind the scenes, who
had long since resolved upon and planned it.
armed mobs of "workers" intimidated all and sundry, including both
and the Palace at critical moments, exactly on the model employed later by
"Sacred Bands" and the "Marseillais" in the French
Disraeli draws again and again startling parallels between this and the French
Notably in his passages on the Press, "no longer under restraint,"
deluge of revolutionary pamphlets and leaflets. He writes:
1640 to 1660, about 30,000 appear to have started up."
collection of French revolutionary pamphlets now stands by the side of the
tracts of the age of Charles I, as abundant in number and as fierce in
hand behind the curtain played the strings . . .
post up a correct list of 59 commoners, branding them with the odious title
'Straffordians or betrayers of their country'."
hand indeed? But Disraeli who knew so much, now discreetly draws a veil over
iron curtain; and it is left to us to complete the revelation.
do so we must turn to such other works as the Jewish Encyclopedia, Sombart's
The Jews and Modern Capitalism, and others. From these we learn that
the chief figure of the revolution, was in close contact with the powerful Jew
in Holland; and was in fact paid large sums of money by Manasseh Ben
whilst Fernandez Carvajal, "The Great Jew" as he was called, was the
of the New Model Army.
The Jews in England we read:
brought a large contingent of Jews to England, their rallying point was the
of the Portuguese Ambassador De Souza, a Marano (secret Jew).
among them was Fernandez Carvajal, a great financier and army
January of the previous year, the attempted arrest of the five members had set
motion the armed gangs of "Operatives" already mentioned, from the
pamphlets were broadcasted on this occasion, as Disraeli tells us:
the ominous insurrectionary cry of 'To your tents, O Israel'."
after this the King and the Royal Family left the Palace of Whitehall.
five members with armed mobs and banners accompanying them, were given a
return to Westminster. The stage was now set for the advent of Carvajal and
Jews and the rise of their creature Cromwell.
scene now changes. The Civil War has taken its course. The year is 1647:
has been won and lost. The King is virtually a prisoner, while treated as an
guest at Holmby House.
to a letter published in Plain English (a weekly review published by
British Publishing Co. and edited by the late Lord Alfred Douglas.) on 3rd
Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer period than they
friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently sent me a letter
two extracts from the Synagogue at Mulheim. The volume in which
are contained was lost at some period during the Napoleonic Wars, and has
come into Mr. van Valckert's possession.
is written in German, and contains extracts of letters sent and received by
of the Mulheim Synagogue. The first entry he sends me is of a letter
O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.
return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England:
however impossible while Charles living.
cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do
at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but
have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin,
willing to help in his escape.
reply was dispatched the following:
O.C. by E. Pratt.
grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted.
too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to
His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support
be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences."
this information now at our disposal, the subsequent moves on the part of the
stand out with a new clearness. On 4th June, 1647, Cornet Joyce, acting on
orders from Cromwell himself, and, according to Disraeli, unknown even to
Fairfax, descended upon Holmby House with 500 picked
troopers, and seized the King. According to Disraeli,
plan was arranged on May 30th at a secret meeting held at Cromwell's
though later Cromwell pretending that it was without his concurrence."
move coincided with a sudden development in the army; the rise of the
"Rationalists." Their doctrines were those of the French
revolutionaries; in fact,
we know today as Communism. These were the regicides, who four times
Parliament, till there was left finally 50 members, Communist-like themselves,
later as the Rump.
return to the letter from Mulheim Synagogue of the 12th June, 1647, and its
suggestion that attempted escape should be used as a pretext for execution.
such an event took place, on 12th November of that year. Hollis and Ludlow
the flight as a stratagem of Cromwell's. Isaac Disraeli states:
historians have decided that the King from the day of his
from Holmby to his escape to the Isle of Wight was throughout the
more remains to be said. Cromwell had carried out the orders from the
and now it only remained to stage the mock trial.
for position continued for some time. And it became apparent that the
of Commons, even in their partially "purged" condition, were in
favour of coming
an agreement with the King. On 5th December, 1648, the House sat all night;
carried the question, "That the King's concessions were satisfactory to a
such agreement have been reached, of course, Cromwell would not have
the large sums of money which he was hoping to get from the Jews. He
again. On the night of December 6th, Colonel Pryde, on his instructions,
the last and most famous "purge" of the House of Commons, known as
4th January, the Communist remnant of 50 members, the Rump, invested
with "the supreme authority."
9th January "a High Court of Justice" to try the King was
proclaimed. Two-thirds of
members were Levelers from the Army. Algernon Sidney warned Cromwell:
the King can be tried by no court. Second, no man can be tried by this
writes Hugh Ross Williamson in his Charles and Cromwell; and he adds a
touch to the effect that
English lawyer could be found to draw up the charge, which was eventually
to an accommodating alien, Isaac Dorislaus."
to say, Isaac Dorislaus was exactly the same sort of alien as Carvajal and
Ben Israel and the other financiers who paid the "Protector" his
Jews were once again permitted to land freely in England in spite of strong
by the sub-committee of the Council of State, which declared that they would
a grave menace to the State and the Christian religion. Perhaps it is due to
that the actual act of banishment has never to this day been repealed.
English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one ...
that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of
were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France.
1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile
the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In that document we read
the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known
us for it was entirely the work of our hands."[Protocol No.3]
Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written,
the British and French revolutions, the secrets of which are well
to us for they were entirely the work of our hands."
difficult problem of the subjugation of both Kingdoms was still however
was Royalist before everything else; and she had proclaimed Charles II King.
armies marched round Scotland, aided by their Geneva sympathizers,
Judaic barbarity; but Scotland still called Charles II King. He moreover
the Presbyterian form of Christianity for Scotland; and slowly but steadily
in England began to come round to the Scottish point of view.
upon the death of Cromwell, all Britain welcomed the King's restoration to the
1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important difference between the
he had fled from as a boy, and the one to which he returned as King. The
of Kingship were entrenched within his kingdom now, and as soon as the
should be set for renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing
more persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ's Church,
attack would develop.
next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances of both Kingdoms
hands of the Jews, who were now firmly ensconced within.
evidently had no consciousness of the Jewish problem or plans, or the
they held for his peoples. The wisdom and experience of Edward I had
lost in the centuries of segregation from the Jewish virus. A consciousness of
danger to the Crown in placing his enemies in possession of the weapon of a
Plot" cry he did retain.
James II's accession, the crisis could not be long delayed. The most
pamphleteering and propaganda was soon in full swing against him, and
is no surprise to find that many of the vilest pamphlets were actually printed
This country was now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons; and
comings and goings took place during these years.
were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law had joined those who
against him; but he utterly refused to credit them, or take any action till
that the expedition against himself was actually under way.
chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial juncture was
first Duke of Marlborough. It is interesting to read in the Jewish
this Duke for many years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the
Jew Solomon Medina.
real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a few years
later in 1694,
the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the "Bank of
England" and the
of the National Debt.
charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting
converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money
to secure their loans on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful
of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously
that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all
to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the
blood of the land, the real wealth which was the birthright of the British
Germany's most successful economic system was NOT backed by gold. He
the blood-sucking grip of the Zionist Jew Money Masters, therefore
be destroyed!" and Adolf Hitler vilified down through ages so the
their government return to the gold standard. -- jackie]
political and economic union of England and Scotland was shortly afterwards
upon Scotland with wholesale corruption, and in defiance of formal protests
every county and borough. The main objects of the Union were to suppress the
Mint in Scotland, and to force upon her, too, responsibility for the
grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain. The danger was
the members of the new joint Parliament would sooner or later, in the spirit
challenge this state of affairs. To provide against this, therefore, the party
was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction and enabling
to divide and rule; using their newly-established financial power to ensure
their own men and their own policies should secure the limelight, and
from their newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.
was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of the amount
In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be legal security for 1,000
of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in gold could earn 30 pounds interest
with no more trouble to the lender than the keeping of a few ledger entries.
owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every hour of daylight
to make perhaps 4%. The end of the process must only be a matter of time. The
must become millionaires; those who own and work the land, the
and the Scotsman, must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably
now, when it is nearly completed.
has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as helping the poor
the rich. It has been in reality nothing of the kind. It has been in the main
ruination of the landed classes, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their
by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on.
French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the history of
the fall of Rome.
new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had a mob
organized successful revolution against all other classes in the state, under
sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace
principles enshrined in those slogans.
before had any one section of any nation conquered all other sections; and
swept away every feature of the national life and tradition, from King,
clergy, constitution, flag, calendar, and place names, to coinage.
a phenomenon merits the closest attention; especially in view of the fact that
been followed by identical outbreaks in many countries.
main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this fact:
revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It was
work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything, which had
conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in high
places in the
Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott, but by Robes Pierre himself.
have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they were not British,
or Italians, or any other nationals; they were, of course, Jews.
us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :
the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of
The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the
of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.
were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words 'Liberty,
Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to
baits, and with them carried away the well-being of the world.
would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see
in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be freedom (meaning, of
freedom as understood by Socialists and Communists, freedom to wreck
own country)." Protocols of Zion-No. 1.
this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a master key to the
happenings of the French Revolution. The somewhat confused picture of
and events moving across the screen, which our history books have shown
will suddenly become a concerted and connected human drama.
we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of 1640, Russia of
Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama
us with a new and personal sense of reality.
is a blow struck at a paralytic."
so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization, and vast resources,
well as cunning and secrecy far above the ordinary are necessary for its
is amazing indeed that people should suppose that "mobs" or
"the people" ever
or ever could, undertake such a complicated and costly operation. No mistake
could be more dangerous; for it will result in total inability to recognize
significance of events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary movement.
process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the infliction of
secondly, the striking of the blow or blows.
is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that the secrecy is
signs are debt, loss of publicity control, and the existence of
organizations in the doomed state.
particularly international debt, is the first and over-mastering grip. Through
in high places are suborned, and alien powers and influences are introduced
body politic. When the debt grip has been firmly established, control of every
publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip on
stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the right hand of
the paralysis; while it is the revolutionary left that holds the dagger and
the fatal blow. Moral corruption facilitates the whole process.
1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France. The world's big
were firmly established.
possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver stocks, that they
most of Europe in their debt, certainly France."
writes Mr McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on page
change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of
whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and had become debt. In
old Europe wealth had been measured in lands, crops, herds and minerals;
a new standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money to which
title 'credit' had been given."
debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means
except in terms of gold: and had the King's advisers decided to issue
on the security of the lands and real wealth of France, the position could
fairly easily righted. As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one
another, who either could not or would not break with the system imposed by
such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only grow heavier and
terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or silver, neither of which France
who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these manipulators of gold
who had succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe, and
real wealth by millions upon millions of usurious loans?
late Lady Queensborough, in her important work Occult Theocracy gives
outstanding names, taking her facts from L'Anti-Semitisme by the Jew
London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother Abraham
Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses Montifiore, as
directly concerned in financing the French Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig
and his son-in-law David Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace. These
recall the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:
gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for it has not
able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so as we have removed
from circulation as far as possible."
hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who . . . come
with outstretched palm."
words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France. Sir Walter Scott
Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, thus describes the situation:-
financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are treated by
moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with the one hand, with
other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompenses
a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights granted to
them, the whole finances of France were brought to total confusion."
Louis' chief finance minister during these last years of growing confusion was
"a Swiss" of German extraction, son of a German professor of whom
had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a representative of the
system owning allegiance to that system."
can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in Necker; and when we
to this the fact that his previous record was that of a daring and
we can understand why the national finances of France under his baneful
rapidly worsened, so that after four years of his manipulations, the
government had contracted an additional and far more serious debt of
1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England. By 1771 the
had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc de Chartres afterwards
became Grand Master. This type of freemasonry was largely innocent, both
policy and personnel in its early days; but as events proved, the real moving
ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.
Duc d'Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of little principle,
vain and ambitious libertine, he had no motives beyond the ousting of the
and the establishing of a democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch.
in addition but little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the
most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men whom he probably
knew; and who sent him to the guillotine soon after his base and
role had been played.
Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure of the Revolution
cast in much the same role. He was a much abler man than d'Orleans, but so
libertine that he was shunned by all his own class, and imprisoned more than
the instance of his own father.
is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of the Jewish
and to have been more in the company of the Jewess Mrs. Herz than was
husband. He was not only an early figure-head in French Freemasonry in the
years, but introduced Illuminism into France.
Moses Mendelssohn is the 'learned Jew' who is quoted as saying that:
not a religion. It is a law religionized".
my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political program
wrapped in a cloak of religion". - jackie]
Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind freemasonry. The
into all the lodges of Grand Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and
by cabalistic Jews.
is interesting to note that the Duc D'Orleans and Talleyrand were both
by Mirabeau shortly after the latter had introduced it into France, from
where its headquarters had been established in 1782 under Adam
1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as though the
themselves made a last moment attempt to warn France and Europe against
massing powers of evil:
struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.
police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world revolution.
the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the Illuminati
and much further evidence was discovered.
authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was too far
and no action resulted.
1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France affiliated to the
the direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over
we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic Illuminism
Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong secret organization
the whole of France.
the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under that again the Blue,
National, Masonry had operated until it was converted over-night into Grand
by Phillipe d'Orleans in 1773. Little did Egalite suspect the satanic powers
he was invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were.
Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were lit by
the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789, the paralysis
executive authority by the secret organizations was complete.
by control of public opinion and publicity was well advanced by then also.
was the manner of its accomplishment.
1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his reckless
extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.
1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing over his palace,
and house the Palais Royal, to his creditors, with powers to form there a
of politics, printing, pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels,
art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form
every variety of public debauchery.
fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property to install a
for publicity and corruption, which appealed to every lowest instinct in human
and deluged the enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and
output of its printing presses and debating clubs.
Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood:
gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city."
is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the creditors at
was one de Laclos, a political adventurer of alien origin, author of Liaisons
and other pornographic works, who was said "to study the politics of
because of his love for politics."
steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was linked with a
systematic personal attacks of the vilest and most unscrupulous nature upon
characters whom the Jacobins thought likely to stand in their way. This
known as "L'infamie."
Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this typically Jewish form
No lie or abuse was too vile to level at her. More intelligent, alert, and
the weak and indolent Louis, Marie Antoinette presented a considerable
the revolution. She had, more-over, received many warnings regarding
her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time more awake to its
when she had written to her sister some years previously:
believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much about
Here it is far from having the significance that it may have
in Europe. Here everything is open and one knows all. Then where
the danger be?
might well be worried if it were a question of a political secret society. But
the contrary the government lets it spread, and it is only that which it
association the objects of which are union and charity.
dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion to say that
who drink and sing are not suspect of organizing plots. Nor is it a society
atheists, for we are told God is on the lips of all. They are very charitable.
bring up the children of their poor and dead members. They endow their
What harm is there in all that?"
harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker designs?
the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on to them the
of the Queen's letter; and we can imagine them shaking with laughter, and
their hands in satisfaction; hands that were itching to destroy the very life
and her Queen; and which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that
convert secret conspiracy into the "massacres of September" and the
of the guillotine.
order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an elaborate hoax
at the time, when the financiers and grain speculators were deliberately
conditions of poverty and hunger in Paris.
diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was ordered at the
in the Queen's name by an agent of the Jacobins. The unfortunate Queen
nothing of this affair until the necklace was brought round to her for
she naturally disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she
consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a financial
printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full blast on to the
every kind of criticism leveled at the Queen.
further scandal was then engineered for the presses. Some prostitute from the
Royal was engaged to disguise herself as the Queen; and by the forged letter
Cardinal Prince de Rohan was induced to meet the supposed Queen about
at the Palais Royal, supposing he was being asked for advice and help by the
on the subject of the necklace.
event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the printing presses and
who started a further campaign containing the foulest innuendoes that
be imagined concerning the whole affair. The moving spirit behind the scene
Cagliostro, alias Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the
and a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at Frankfurt by
the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent over to London, where
of the stones were retained by the Jew Eliason. Attacks of a similar nature
against many other decent people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin
After eight years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of
every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced the King to summon
General, the first portion of their plans for revolution (i.e. paralysis) were
It now only remained to strike the blow or series of blows, which were to
France of her throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her clergy,
her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture; leaving in their place, when
work was done, citizen hewers of wood and drawers of water under an
1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in motion; each more
than the one preceding it; each unmasking fresh demands and more violent
revolutionary leaders. In their turn each of these leaders, a puppet only of
behind the revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to
of his victims of yesterday.
Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, was used to prepare the ground for the revolution; to
with his name and influence the infancy of the revolutionary club; to
and the Palais Royal; and to sponsor such acts as the march of the
"women" on this occasion were mostly men in disguise. d'Orleans was
that the King and Queen would be assassinated by this mob, and himself
a democratic King. The real planners of the march, however, had other
main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family to Paris, where
be clear of protection from the army, and under the power of the Commune or
County Council in which the Jacobins were supreme.
continued to make use of Egalite right up to the time of the vote on the
when he crowned his sordid career by leading the open vote in voting for the
his cousin. His masters thereafter had no further use for his services; and he
followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all classes.
played a similar role to that of Egalite. He had intended that the revolution
cease with the setting up of Louis as a democratic monarch with himself as
adviser. He had no desire to see violence done to the King. On the contrary,
last days before he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts to
removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal generals still commanding
was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the Jacobin club of
that bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which had materialized out of the
of the Orient Masons and Illuminati. It was Mirabeau's voice, loud and
kept in check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.
is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and strength of the
he had worked so long and so industriously to unchain. In his last attempt to
the royal family by getting them out of Paris, he actually succeeded in
all opposition in the Jacobin club. That evening he died by a sudden and
and, as the author of The Diamond Necklace writes:
was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned."
like Phillipe Egalite, and later Danton and Robes Pierre, Mirabeau too was
from the stage when his role had been played. We are reminded of the
in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion:
execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever
a suspicion of it."
this way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too much."
Mr E. Scudder writes in his Life of Mirabeau:
died at a moment when the revolution might still have been checked."
figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several important occasions during
first revolutionary stages. He was one of those simple freemasons, who are
they know not wither, in a ship they have not fully explored, and by currents
which they are totally ignorant.
a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very severely handled
outbreaks of revolutionary violence, notably in the march of the women to
during the attack on the Tuilleries, and at the Champs de Mars. He, too,
the establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no
to the King even from Phillipe Egalite, whom he treated with the utmost
and after the march of the women to Versailles, believing on that occasion
intended the assassination of the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.
evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the revolution, and was
to a war against Austria, which the Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he
back to Paris in an effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to
Mirabeau's death followed, and Louis' fate was sealed.
wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robes Pierre, and the fanatics of the Jacobin
dominated the scene.
September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible "September
being murdered in the prisons of Paris alone, and many more over the
should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and held till the time
in the prisons by one Manuel, Procurer of the Commune. Sir Walter Scott
understood much concerning the influences which were at work behind the
In his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30:
demand of the Communaute de Paris,* now the Sanhedrin of the Jacobins,
of course, for blood."
Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.] Again, on page 56
power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes Pierre, Danton
Marat shared the high places in the synagogue."
of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work:
principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners."
of the names of these "foreigners" are worthy of note:
was Chlodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal, said to be of
was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already mentioned. He it was
started the attack upon royalty in the Convention, which culminated with the
of Louis and Marie Antoinette.
was David the painter, a leading member of the Committee of Public
which "tried" the victims. His voice was always raised calling for
Walter Scott writes that this fiend used to preface his "bloody work of
the professional phrase, 'let us grind enough of the Red'." David it was
the Cult of the Supreme being; and organized
conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted for every
sign of rational devotion." (Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon,
were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five "Directors," who with a
became the government after the fall of Robes Pierre, being known as the
terms "Directors" and "Elders" are, of course,
other observation should be made here; it is that this important work by Sir
in 9 volumes, revealing so much of the real truth, is practically unknown, is
with his other works, and is almost unobtainable.
familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full significance of this
the added importance it lends to Sir Walter Scott's evidence regarding the
the French Revolution.
return to the scene in Paris. Robes Pierre now remains alone, and apparently
of the scenes; but this again was only appearance. Let us turn to the Life
Pierre, by one
G. Renier, who writes as though Jewish secrets were at his
April to July 1794 (the fall of Robes Pierre) the terror was at its height. It
never the dictatorship of a single man, least of all Robes Pierre. Some 20
(the Committees of Public Safety and of General Security) shared the
quote Mr. Renier again:
the 28th July, 1794," "Robes Pierre made a long speech before the
. . . a philippic against ultra-terrorists. . . uttering vague general
dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot bring
entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this profound mystery of
But I can affirm most positively that among the authors of this plot
the agents of that system of corruption and extravagance, the most
of all the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the
I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is
Renier continues with all a Jew's satisfaction:
he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!"
this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and crosses the t's,
Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes Pierre's allusion to the "corrupting
foreigners" was getting altogether too near the mark; a little more and
would be out.
2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early on the following
to the guillotine.
let us recall Protocol 15:
this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."
In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed by the Jew
on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that he intended in future
U.S. loans on a debt free basis similar to the debt free money known as
with which he had financed the Civil War.
Francois Coty, the celebrated scent manufacturer, wrote in Figaro on 20th
subsidies granted to the Nihilists at this period (1905-1917) by Jacob Schiff,
Kuhn Loeb and Co., New York, were no longer acts of isolated generosity. A
Russian terrorist organization had been set up at his expense. It
Russia with its emissaries."
creation of terrorist formations by Jews within a country marked down for
whether they be called Nihilists or as in France in 1789, "Sacred
or "Operatives," as in the Britain of Charles I, now stands revealed
Schiff also financed Japan in her war against Russia 1904-5, as we learn from
war was immediately followed by an attempt at revolution on a considerable
Russia, which, however, proved abortive. The next attempt, during the Great
with complete success.
the 3rd January, 1906, the Russian Foreign Minister supplied to Emperor
a report on this revolutionary outbreak, which, as revealed in the American
July 13th, 1918, contained the following passages:
events which took place in Russia in 1905 . . . plainly indicate that the
movement . . . has a definite international character . . .
revolutionaries possess great quantities of arms imported from abroad and
considerable financial means . . .
is bound to conclude that there are foreign capitalists' organizations
in supporting our revolutionary movement. If we add to the above that,
has been proved beyond any doubt, a very considerable part is played by
. . .
ring-leaders in other organizations as well as their own . . .
the most bellicose element of the revolution . . .
may feel entitled to assume that the above-mentioned foreign support of the
revolutionary movement comes from Jewish capitalist circles."
assumption in the foregoing report was indeed well justified. It was to be
by an even more important official document penned at the height of the
itself, in 1918, by Mr. Oudendyke, the representative of the Netherlands
in St. Petersburg, who was in charge of British interests in Russia after
liquidation of our Embassy by the bolsheviks.
important indeed was this report of Mr. Oudendyke's held to be by Mr. Balfour,
it was addressed, that it was set out in a British government white paper on
issued in April 1919. (Russia No. 1.)
it I have read the following passage: [Emphasis by author]
consider that the immediate suppression of bolshevism is the greatest
now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still
and unless bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound
spread in one form or another over Europe, and the whole world, as it is
and worked by Jews, who have no nationality, and whose one
is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
still clearer light is thrown on these happenings by an article written on
in a paper called The Communist, at Kharkov, by one M. Cohen:
great Russian revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of Jews.
are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as privates are
but in the Committees, and in the Soviet organization as
the Jews are gallantly leading the masses.
symbol of Jewry has become the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which
be seen in the fact of the adoption of the five-pointed star, which in former
was the symbol of Zionism and Jewry."
Fahey, in his important and authenticated work, The Rulers of Russia,
stating that in 1917 of the 52 persons who took over the direction in Russia,
but Lenin were Jews.
Fahey must somehow have missed the fact that Lenin himself WAS a Jew. That
mean then that ALL who took over the direction in Russia were Jews. - jackie]
thorough was the mass liquidation of all but hewers of wood and drawers of
Russia, that this Jewish grip remained unaltered. Dr. Fahey tells us that in
Executive of the Third international, which ruled Russia
of 59 men, of which 56 were Jews. The other three, including Stalin,
married to Jewesses. Of 17 principal Soviet ambassadors, 4 were Jews."
of Russia, pages 8 and 9.)
Rev. George Simons, who was Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church
St. Petersburg from 1907 to October 1918, appeared before a Committee of the
States Senate on the 12th February, 1919, and gave them a report of his
knowledge of the happenings in Russia up to the time he left. Dr. Fahey
him as saying during this evidence:
December, 1918, out of 388 members of the revolutionary government, only
happened to be real Russians; all the rest were Jews with the exception of
U.S. Negro. Two hundred and sixty-five of the Jews come from the Lower
Side of New York."
has been the condition of affairs in the U.S.S.R. from that day to this.
a number of Jews were liquidated in the so-called "Moscow Purge,"
the situation in no way. It merely signified that one Jewish faction had
over, and liquidated, another. There has never been anything in the nature
a Gentile revolt against the Jewish domination.
fact that some Jews were liquidated by winning factions behind the iron
be used to deceive the world outside into thinking that this was the result of
revolt, and from time to time a hoax of this kind has been systematically
world opinion gradually turned hostile to the U.S.S.R. important Jews began to
this feeling, combined with a gradual realization that bolshevism is Jewish,
unpleasant reactions for them.
1945, therefore, a further powerful campaign was organized from influential
circles, notably in the U.S.A., to put out the story once again that Russia
on the Jews. They evidently failed, however, to advise their lesser brethren
move; and indignant and informed denials were soon forthcoming.
journal called Bulletin, the organ of the Glasgow Discussion Group, wrote in
rubbish as is now being spread as to the growth of anti-Semitism in
is nothing but malicious lies and pure invention."
1st February, 1949, the Daily Worker carried an article in which a Mr.
few names and figures of Jews in high office in the U.S.S.R., from which he
recently returned, for he wrote:
never heard a breath of criticism over this state of affairs. . .
would render a Soviet official liable to prosecution in the same way
a private citizen may be brought before the courts for anti-Semitism."
the 10th November, 1949, the Daily Worker, that constant and burning
the Jews, printed an article by Mr D. Kartun, entitled "Stamping Out
shows the complete Jewish control behind the iron curtain when he writes:
Poland and the other people's democracies anti-Semitism in word or deed is
1945 and 1949 the propaganda to convince Gentiles outside the iron curtain,
within that area anti-Semitism was rampant, and the Jews driven from high
was energetically pursued. It began to be believed by quite a number of
who should have known better; so much so, that in the autumn of the latter
I thought it worth while to get out a list showing the number of vital
Jews behind the iron curtain. Here is an extract from those lists.
Stalin Married to a Jewess
of State Control Mekhlis Jew
Cominform Organ Yudin Jew
Publicist Abroad for
Minister Molotoff Married to a Jewess
Ruler Jacob Bergman Jew
Prosecutor T. Cyprian Jew
Youth Movements Dr. Braniewsky Jew
Ruler Mathias Rakosi Jew
Ruler Anna Pauker Jewess (Since
Ruler Moishe Pyjede Jew
"Kagan" or 'Khagan' is the Khazarian word for 'King'. More than 90%
are not Semitic, nor are their ancestors. They are of the Turko-Mongolian
whose Kagan adopted Talmudism around 740 A.D.]
May 1949, the Daily Worker, which is, of course, consistently and ardently
printed an article by Mr A. Rothstein praising the U.S.S.R. to the
and about the same time another article on similar lines about the
behind the iron curtain by Mr Sam Aronvitch.
the 10th November the same paper printed an article in which D. Kartun,
"People's Democracies" and the stamping out of anti-Semitism there,
one could dream of making an anti-semitic speech or writing an anti-semitic
in any of these countries. If they did their jail sentence would be both
the last few years we have been supplied with further dramatic proof of the
between Jews and the U.S.S.R.
the Canadian spy trials, which focused the spotlight on atom spying for the
with the conviction and imprisonment of Frank Rosenberg (alias Rose), the
Jew Communist Member of Parliament, and several Jews, to the conviction
imprisonment of many others of the same gang in Britain and the U.S.A.,
Professor Weinbaum, Judith Coplon, Harry Gold, David Greenglass, Julius
Miriam Moskewitz, Abraham Brothanz, and Raymond Boyer, who —
a Gentile by birth — married a Jewess and, I believe, adopted the Jewish
on that occasion.
we had the flight to the U.S.S.R. with atom secrets also of the Jew Professor
who had been working in close association with Fuchs.
doubt we shall continue to be regaled with plausible stories proving that
anti-semitic; but it is not hard to realise that such a Jewish grip backed by
elaborate spy and liquidation squads known to man, would cause a convulsion
would shake the world before its grip could be broken.
of Revolutionary Technique
revolutions in history merit our special attention. The study and comparison
employed therein will reveal on the one hand a basic similarity between them:
on the other an interesting advance in technique, with each succeeding
is as if we studied the various stages in the evolution of the modern rifle
old "brown Bess."
revolutions in question are firstly the Cromwellian, secondly the French,
and lastly the Spanish revolution of 1936.
four can be proved to have been the work of international Jewry. The first
and secured the murder of the reigning monarch and the liquidation of his
each case Jewish finance, and underground intrigue, are clearly traceable; and
measures passed by the revolutionaries have been "emancipation" for
was financed by various Jews, notably Manasseh Ben Israel and Carvajal
Great Jew," contractor to his army.
this occasion Jewish influence remained financial and commercial, while the
weapons and medium were semi-religious, all the Cromwellians being
in Old Testament Judaism; some, such as General Harrison, even carried their
to the length of advocating the adoption of the Mosaic Law as the law of
and the substitution of Saturday as the Sabbath in place of the Christian
are all familiar with the absurd Old Testament passages which the Roundhead
and file adopted as names, such as Sergeant Obadiah, "Bind their Kings in
and their nobles in fetters of iron." The Cromwellian revolution was
work of destruction had not been sufficiently thorough to frustrate
restoration of the old regime.
second revolution, the so-called "Glorious Revolution" of 1689, was
was financed by Jews, notably Solomon Medina, Suasso, Moses Machado and
the French revolution of 1789 the technique had been notably improved. Secret
had been developed throughout France on a grand scale in the preceding
The plans for the liquidation of the former regime are by this time far more
judicial murder of a kindly and well intentioned King and a few nobles is
mass murders in prisons and in private houses of the whole of the nobility,
and bourgeoisie, regardless of sex.
Cromwellian damage and desecration of a few churches by their temporary use
stables is developed into a general wrecking of Christian churches, or their
into public lavatories, brothels, and markets; and the banning of the
of the Christian religion and even the ringing of church bells.
war is not allowed to develop. The army is side-tracked, and kept apart from
by his seizure at an early stage. So powerful is the unseen control by 1789
the dregs of the French population victoriously liquidate all their natural
in itself a most unnatural and suspicious phenomenon.
suspicious still is the sudden appearance of strong bands of armed hooligans,
march on Paris from Lyons and Marseilles; and are recorded as being
we have the first formations of alien mercenary and criminal elements, forcing
upon a country not their own, which were to have their finished and
prototype in the International Brigades, which attempted to force Marxism
Spain 150 years later.
in the 17th century had not been dismembered and hideously remoulded on
lines; but all familiar land marks in 18th century France were destroyed.
splendid and historic names and titles of counties, departments and families
and France divided into numbered squares occupied merely by
the months of the calendar were changed.
national flag of France with its lilies and its glories was banned. Instead
received the Tricolour, badge of murder and rapine. Here, however, the
made a mistake.
Tricolour might not be the honoured and famous flag of France. It might be
with the blood of massacre, regicide and villainy. It might be stinking with
of the Jewish criminals who designed and foisted it upon the French people;
was proclaimed the national flag, and the national flag it became; and with
flag came the national army, and a national leader, Napoleon.
was not long before this great Frenchman ran up against the secret powers, who
then controlled the armies of France. They had planned to use these armies to
all European states, one after another; to overthrow all leadership, and
rule of the mob, apparently, in reality of course their own.
in this manner do the Jews today plan to use the Red Army. Such a policy
by aliens of this type could not long continue once a national army had thrown
a real national leader; their outlook and policy must inevitably be poles
apart. It was
long before the First Consul challenged and overthrew these aliens and their
the year 1804 Napoleon had come to recognise the Jew and his plans as a menace
France and all that the revolution had swept away he systematically restored.
time onwards Jewish money financed every coalition against him; and Jews today
that it was Rothschild rather than Wellington who defeated Napoleon.
these things, Hitler, on his occupation of Paris, immediately ordered a
guard of honour to be mounted over Napoleon's tomb at the Invalides; and
the body of L'Aiglon (Napoleon's son by Maria Louisa) brought from Austria,
at last in his proper place at the side of his father.
we come to examine the Russian revolution we find that the technique is still
and far more drastic. On this occasion no national flag, army, or anthem is
After the dregs of the community have apparently accomplished the
and liquidated every other class down to and including the kulak (a man
three cows), they are herded into a polyglot force called the Red Army; over
an international red flag, not a Russian flag; their anthem is the
technique of revolution in Russia was so perfected that to this day it has
Jewish regime established there against all counter strokes.
next revolution to merit our attention is the one that broke out in Spain in
for Europe, it was frustrated by General Franco and a number of gallant
who instantly took the field in opposition to the revolutionary forces, and
in a long struggle in crushing them.
achievement is all the more remarkable in view of the latest development in
organisation, which was then revealed in the shape of the International
These International Brigades, besides representing the very latest novelty in
technique, were a remarkable production.
were recruited from criminals, adventurers and dupes, mostly communists, from
different countries, mysteriously transported and assembled in formations in
a few weeks of the outbreak of disorder, uniformed in a garb closely related
battle dress, and armed with weapons bearing the Jewish five-pointed star.
star and the Seal of Solomon were upon the signet rings of N.C.O.s and
this communist horde of ill-disciplined ruffians. I have seen them myself in
October 1936 these International Brigades were already assembled in Spain in
numbers. Undisciplined and blackguardly though they were, the mere
of a large and well-armed political army, intervening suddenly on one side in
stages of a civil war, might reasonably have been counted upon to achieve a
before the patriotic and decent element in the country could have time to
an adequate fighting machine.
the British public were kept in total ignorance as to the true significance of
was taking place in Spain two countries in Europe were alive to the situation.
and Italy had each in their turn experienced the throes of communist
and emerged victorious over this foulest of earthly plagues. They knew who
financed and organised the International Brigades; and with what fell purpose
had been declared in October 1936 the Capital of the Soviet States of
the critical moment they [Hitler and Mussolini] intervened in just sufficient
counter the International Brigade, and enable the Spanish people to organise
army, which, in due course, easily settled the matter.
the matter, that is to say, as far as Spain was concerned.
was, however, another settlement to come. International Jewry had been
thwarted. They would not rest henceforward until they could have their
until they could by hook or crook turn the guns of the rest of the world
two States, which in addition to thwarting their designs in Spain were in the
of placing Europe upon a system independent of gold and usury, which, if
to develop, would break the Jewish power for ever.
Bells The Cat
urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter to Mr. Balfour,
bolshevism as a Jewish plan, which if not checked by the combined action
the European Powers, would engulf Europe and the world, was no exaggeration.
the end of that year the red flag was being hoisted in most of the great
In Hungary the Jew Bela Kuhn organised and maintained for some time a
and bloody tyranny similar to the one in Russia. In Germany, the Jews
Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg, etc., made a desperate bid for
These and other similar convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its own
just frustrated the onslaughts.
most countries concerned a few voices were raised in an endeavour to expose
nature of these evils. Only in one, however, did a political leader and group
grasped to the full the significance of these happenings, and perceived behind
of native hooligans the organisation and driving power of world Jewry.
leader was Adolf Hitler, and his group the National Socialist Party of
before in history had any country not only repulsed organised revolution, but
Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact. We need not wonder that the
of Jewish vituperation were flooded over these men and their leader; nor
we make the mistake of supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter
men everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for
if any value liberty, and set out to seek truth and defend it, this duty of
investigation is one which they cannot shirk. To accept unquestioningly the
and misrepresentations of a Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn
idleness, if for no worse reason.
act on such unverified a basis is to sin against the Light.
the case of Germany and Hitler the task of research is not difficult. We have
authorities that Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, stated fully and accurately
observations and conclusions concerning all these vital matters.
false pictures have been propagated deliberately about this book, by quoting
out of their context, distorting meanings, and downright misrepresentation.
read many of these unscrupulous diatribes, it was with no little surprise that
this book for myself not so very long ago.
many conversations I had heard and taken part in, I now realise that most
of the public were as ignorant as I of the real nature of this remarkable
propose, therefore, to try and give a true picture of its spirit and purport
its two main themes:
realisation and exposure of the Jewish scheme for world Marxism; and
admiration of, and longing for friendship with Great Britain. Writing of the
before 1914, Hitler states:
still saw Jewry as a religion ...
the existence of deliberate Jewish hostility I had no conception ...
gradually realised that the Social Democratic Press was preponderantly
by Jews ...
was not a single paper with which Jews were connected which could be
as genuinely national ...
seized all the Social Democratic pamphlets I could get hold of, and looked up
names of their authors -- nothing but Jews."
he pursued the study of these questions, Hitler began to perceive the main
made also a deep study of the relation between Judaism and Marxism . . .
Jewish State never had boundaries as far as space was concerned; it was
as regards space, but bound down by its conception of itself as a race.
people, therefore, was always a State within a State . . .
Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle in nature . . .
the value of the individual among men, combats the importance of
and race, thereby depriving humanity of the whole meaning of
in the west today is the forerunner of Marxism, which would be
the Jew, with the help of his Marxian creed, conquers the nations of the
crown will be the funeral wreath of the human race ..."
writes of the days of 1918:
did I now believe that by defending myself against the Jews I am doing the
the end of 1918 there came the revolution in Germany organised behind the
army in the field. Concerning this Hitler wrote:
November sailors arrived in lorries, and called on us all to revolt, a few
youths being the leaders in that struggle for the 'freedom, beauty and
of our national life'. Not one of them had ever been to the Front."
real organiser of the revolution and its actual wire-puller the International
The revolution was not made by the forces of peace and order; but by those of
robbery and plunder."
was beginning to learn afresh, and only now (1919) came to a right
of the teachings and intentions of the Jew Karl Marx. Only now
I properly understand his 'Kapital'; and equally also the struggle of Social
against the economics of the nation; and that its aim is to prepare
ground for the domination of the truly international Kapital."
Emperor to offer the hand of friendship to the leaders of Marxism . . .
they held the Imperial hand in theirs the other hand was already feeling for
the Jew there is no bargaining; there is merely the hard 'either, or'."
on Hitler gives in great detail the outlines of the Jewish disruptive machine.
means of the Trades Unions which might have been the saving of the nation,
Jew actually destroys the nation's economics."
creating a press which is on the intellectual level of the least educated, the
and labour organisation obtains force of compulsion enabling it to make
lowest strata of the nation ready for the most hazardous enterprises."
Jewish press . . . tears down all which may be regarded as the prop of a
independence, civilisation and its economic autonomy. It roars
against characters who refuse to bow the knee to Jewish domination,
whose intellectual capacity appears to the Jew in the light of a menace to
ignorance displayed by the mass . . . and the lack of instinctive perception
our upper class make the people easy dupes of this campaign of Jewish
the present day is working its own ruin; it introduces universal suffrage,
about equal rights, and can give no reason for so thinking. In its eyes
rewards are the expression of a man's worth, thus shattering the basis
the noblest equality that could possibly exist."
is one of the tasks of our Movement to hold out prospects of a time when the
will be given what he needs in order to live; but also to maintain the
that man does not live for material enjoyment alone."
political life of today alone has persistently turned its back on this
nature" (i.e. quality) ... "
civilisation is but the outcome of the creative force of personality in the
as a whole, and especially among its leaders . . . the principle of the
of the majority is beginning to poison all life below it; and in fact to break
now see that Marxism is the enunciated form of the Jewish attempt to
the importance of personality in all departments of human life; and to set
the mass of numbers in its place . . . "
principle of decision by majorities has not always governed the human race;
the contrary, it only appears during quite short periods of history, and those
always periods of decadence in nations and States."
must not forget that the international Jew, who continues to dominate over
does not regard Germany as an ally, but as a State destined to undergo
the last page and in almost the last paragraph of Mein Kampf is the following:
party as such stands for positive Christianity, but does not bind itself in
of creed to any particular confession. It combats the Jewish materialistic
within us and without us."
round the world for help in the battle against this terrible menace of Jew
bolshevism, Hitler's mind constantly reverted to Britain and the British
always longed for their friendship. Always declared Britain to be one of the
against chaos; and that her interests and those of Germany were
and not contrary to one another.
was not a British interest but in the first place a Jewish one to destroy
in England there is a continual struggle going on between the
of British state interests and the Jewish world dictatorship."
England is exhausting herself in maintaining her position in the world, the
is organising his measures for its conquest . . . Thus the Jew today is a
in England, and the struggle against the Jewish world menace will be
sacrifice would have been too great in order to gain England's alliance. It
have meant renunciation of the colonies and importance at sea, and
from interference with British industry by competition."
later years these two themes were ceaselessly expounded; viz., the Jewish
and the eagerness for friendship with Britain. Even down to, and including
Hitler pressed the latter idea on all and sundry; even on his highest
did he stop at words, as will be shown later when, as Liddell Hart informs us,
the British Army from annihilation by halting the Panzer Corps, informing his
the while, that he regarded the British Empire and the Catholic Church as
bulwarks of peace and order which must be safeguarded.*
Other Side of the Hill, Chap. X, by Liddell Hart.
Kampf was first published in October 1933.
it had left the printers, the floodgates of Jewish hatred and lies had been
Hitler and the Third Reich all over the world.
people everywhere were deluged with fabrications, distortions and
stories, which drowned the voices of the few who understood the real
in the turmoil was Marx's slogan that before bolshevism could triumph the
Empire must be destroyed; and totally suppressed as far as the British people
concerned was Hitler's repeated declaration of his willingness to defend the
Empire if called upon to assist by force of arms if necessary.
Jewry Declares War
English edition of Mein Kampf was still in the process of printing and
Jewry declared war on the national Socialist regime, and started an intensive
International Jewish Boycott Conference was assembled in Holland in the summer
1933 under the Presidency of Mr. Samuel
Untermeyer, of the
U.S.A., who was
President of the World Jewish Economic Federation formed to combat the
to Jews in Germany.
his return to the U.S.A., Mr. Untermeyer gave an address over Station W.A.B.C.,
text of which, as printed in the New
York Times of August 7th, 1933, I have
me. Mr. Untermeyer referred in the opening phrases to:
holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked";
proceeded to develop the subject at great length, describing the Jews as the
of the world.
of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred
should do so now and here."
Jews who did not join in he denounced, declaring:
are traitors to their race."
January 1934 Mr. Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism, wrote in Natcha
fight against Germany has been carried out for months by every Jewish
conference, trade organisation, by every Jew in the world . . . we
let loose a spiritual and a material war of the whole world against
is perhaps the most confident assertion extant on the Jewish claim, set out in
of Zion, that they can bring about war. Protocol Number 7 states:
must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by a State by war
its neighbour. If these should venture to stand collectively, by universal
the neverendingwar on "terror" today]
should be remembered here that a copy of these Protocols was filed in the
1938 the Jewish war was in full swing; and already through their influence or
many Gentile persons and groups were being drawn into the vortex. Various
of the British Socialist Party were openly advocating joining in this cold
a vigorous and uncompromising clique was growing in all Parties under the
of Messrs. Churchill, Amery, Duff, Cooper and others.
will have no war, but he will be forced to it, not this year, but later
the Jew Emil Ludwig in the June copy of Les Aniles 1934.
June 3rd, 1938, matters were carried a long step further by an article in the
weekly organ of American Jewry. This article, which opened
showing that Hitler never deviated from his Mein Kampf doctrine, went on to
the direst retaliation.
has become patent that a combination of Britain, France and Russia will
or later bar the triumphant march (of Hitler) . . .
by accident or design, a Jew has come to a position of foremost
in each of these nations. In the hands of non-Aryans lies the fate and
very lives of millions . . .
France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum . . . Leon Blum may yet be the
who will lead . . .
Litvinoff, Soviet super salesman, is the Jew who sits at the right hand of
the little tin soldier of communism . . .
English Jew of prominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha, Tommy Atkins' new
in this article we read:
it may come to pass that these three sons of Israel will form the combine
will send the frenzied Nazi dictator to hell. And when the smoke of battle
... and the man who played the swastikaed Christus . . . is lowered into a
in the ground . . . as the trio of non-Aryans intone a ramified requiem . . .
medley of the marseillaise, God Save the King, and the Internationale,
with a proud and aggressive rendering of Eli Eli."
points in the above extract are worthy of special note. Firstly, it is taken
that these three Jews will not for one moment think or act as anything but
and can be relied upon to guide their Gentile dupes to ruin in a plainly
secondly, should be noted the contemptuous reference to the "swastikaed
which Jewry looks forward to burying; and which reveals by its classification
Jewish hatred of Christianity.
Jewish pressure was exerted to the utmost to incite clashes between
Czechs, Poles and Germans.
September of 1938 matters had reached a desperate pass. Mr. Chamberlain
flew out to Munich and achieved the historic settlement with Hitler. It seemed
though the war mongers had been frustrated, and Europe saved. Rarely had such
and evidences of spontaneous delight and thankfulness been evoked as were
throughout Britain and Europe at that triumph.
who knew the power of the enemy, however, knew that Mr Chamberlain's work
certain to be swiftly sabotaged. I remember remarking, on the very evening of
from Munich, that within a week every newspaper in this country and the war
in Parliament, would be attacking Mr. Chamberlain for having secured peace;
of the fact that in so doing they were contemptuously flouting the real
of the people. This remark was only too true, as events proved.
was the Jewish fury so obvious, of course, as in Moscow. I have before me a
of my own designing put out in October 1938. It runs:
you aware that Mr. Chamberlain was burnt in effigy in Moscow as soon as it
known that he had secured peace;
very clearly Who Wanted War, and who are still ceaselessly working to
up strife all the world over." * See Appendix 4.
attempt to provoke war over Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia having failed,
only the detonator in the Polish Corridor, that monstrosity born of the unholy
Conference, and denounced by honest men from Marshal Foch and Arthur
from that time onwards.
feature about the Versailles Conference has been kept secret by those who
the power to keep things from the public or to proclaim things from the house
It is this:
important decisions were taken by the "Big Four" - Britain, France,
U.S.A., represented respectively by Mr. Lloyd George, M. Clemencau, Baron
and President Wilson. So much is known. What is not known is that:
secretary of Mr. Lloyd George was the Jew Sassoon;
M. Clemencau the Jew Mandel Rothschild, now known as Mandel;
Sonino was himself half a Jew: and President Wilson had the Jew
interpreter was another Jew named Mantoux; and
Military Adviser yet another Jew called Kish.
is known that Mr. Lloyd George and others were hazy about geography. Their
secretaries, however, were on the contrary very much on the spot on such
These Jews met at 6 p.m. in the evenings; and mapped out the decisions for
following day's conference of the "Big Four."
results were disastrous from the point of view of all decent people, who hoped
honourable treaty, with terms which, though they might be stringent, would at
just and thereby secure lasting peace.
himself loudly denounced the treaty; declaring that it contained the certain
of another war and deprecating in particular the provision relating to Danzig
Henderson and many public men joined in the denunciation; but all to no avail.
the point of view of men planning another war, however, nothing could have
better than this treaty.
sorts of glaring injustices were ingrained in its text. In addition to the
position at Danzig, a bastard State was brought into being, in which Germans,
etc., together forming a majority of the country, were put under the
of the Czech minority, an element which had thrown in its lot with the
and fought against the Allies in 1918.
design of this State was such geographically that it was styled, and correctly
a dagger pointed at the heart of Germany. It received the outlandish name of
whole of the industrial life from the huge Skoda arsenal downwards was
Jewish banking interests; while we have it on the evidence of Lord Winterton
all the land was mortgaged to the Jews (Hansard, October 1936).
this Messianic domination were enslaved huge sections of populations,
to other nations, henceforward condemned to be held down by force until
country should grow strong enough to champion them.
eventuality was, in my opinion, visualised and actually fostered as we know by
loans to Germany from international banking interests.
it not be forgotten that while Jewish bankers were pouring money into Germany
was rebuilding the Wehrmacht on a bigger scale than ever, a colossal campaign
peace and disarmament was launched in this country. This not only succeeded in
disarming us; but in creating an atmosphere in which Mr. Baldwin had to
that he dared not go to the country asking for more armaments, vital though he
our needs in sea, air and land forces to be. * All prior of course to the rise
anyone who made a study of the personalities and powers behind this so-called
propaganda, as I did, there can be no doubt as to whence the real drive and
anyone appreciating the attitude of the press at that time, and realising that
propaganda been distasteful to those who influence our publicity
there would have blared forth a torrent of invective against our "peace
there is additional proof that this campaign had the support of international
as had the rearmament of Germany. But why? the simple will ask.
answer is fairly simple, if once the purpose behind the Jewish plan is
of the last war we brought the Soviet States of Russia; out of the next war
will bring the Soviet States of Europe. . ."
been the pronouncement at a world meeting of communist parties about 1932. To
the next war possible, therefore, the see-saw must be balanced again; German
built up, and British strength whittled down.
the Europeans can fight each other to the death of one and complete exhaustion
dramatic surprise is in store for both sides. Neither is to be the real
winner. The real
is quite a different army. This army is the one that will receive the real
25 years it will be built up under conditions of the greatest secrecy. Its
show their strength until the conflict is well under way.
until a critical moment in the war will the European armies be permitted to
existence of the huge factories beyond the Urals, or of the colossal
heavily mechanised hordes which will then commence to roll westwards over
under the red flag of Marxism.
These "huge factories" and "colossal proportions of the heavily
are thanks to the American people, via the Lend Lease Act, implemented
Americans were sucked into that war, and minutely detailed in the Diaries of
Racey Jordan).— Jackie]
March 1939 a British guarantee to Poland was given by Mr. Chamberlain on the
of a false report to the effect that a 48-hour ultimatum had been delivered by
to the Poles.
report subsequently turned out to be quite untrue.
guarantee had been given, however, and the decision of peace or war was now
longer in British hands. Jewry had the ball at its feet. Can we doubt but that
encouraged to ignore the German note of March which set forth eminently
suggestions for a peaceful solution of the problem of the Corridor?
See Appendix 6 (we've added) for the Internet readers of this book;
the German White Book that correlates with Captain Ramsey's statements here. -
after month no reply was vouchsafed by Poland to the German note.
insult and outrage occurred with suspicious frequency all along the
frontier, similar to the technique to which the Jews later introduced the
after day the British public was deluged with war propaganda and
of the situation. Finally their minds were closed against any further
to the demands of justice or reason by a new slogan,
cannot trust Hitler's word."
this lie the British public was finally stampeded into throwing all reason and
to the winds and accepting at their face value the war propaganda in the
slogan was founded upon a misrepresentation of Hitler's assurance given on
than one occasion after a "putsch" such as that into Sudetenland,
to make no further demands."
misrepresentation lay in the fact that the press steadily obscured the major
the "demands" to which Hitler referred were all along five fold in
those five areas taken from Germany by a dictated peace in which the
was overwhelmingly German, i.e. Sudetenland, part of Czechoslovakia,
of Poland, the Corridor and Danzig.
German troops occupied each successive section, it is, I believe, accurate to
Hitler declared, that he had no additional demands to make. But here it must
stated in the interests of justice that he never said that this entailed
demands which he had originally very clearly delineated, and repeated on many
namely, the five areas in question.
British public was deluded by its press into supposing that when Hitler said
further demands, that there had never been any statement of his full demands,
of which were still unfulfilled. They were led to believe that Hitler either
any other demands, or that he had abandoned the rest as soon as he had
some of them.
therefore, the next installment was added, the press built on this
the fallacy that Hitler's word could not be trusted. Honest dealing
no such trickery and deception. Such methods are only necessary to bolster up
or unjust causes.
we have the calm and dispassionate judgment in this matter by no less a
than the late Lord Lothian, recently British Ambassador to the U.S.A. In his
at Chatham House on this subject he remarked:
the principle of self-determination had been applied in Germany's favour, as
applied against her, it would have meant the return of Sudetenland,
parts of Poland, the Polish Corridor, and Danzig to the Reich."
is a very different presentment of the case to the one which was foisted upon
public in 1939; and it is the true one. Small wonder that these facts had to
from the ordinary citizen.
the British public realised the truth, that each of these demands of Hitler's
a foundation of reasonable fairness, the people of this island would have
question of war; and it was war, not truth or justice, upon which
war" ended by civilian bombing
a state of war was declared to exist between Britain and Germany in
of 1939, it very soon became apparent that no war was being conducted
Germany against this country.
was no surprise to those who knew the facts of the case. Hitler had again and
made it clear, that he never intended to attack or harm Great Britain or the
Empire. With the Siegfried Line strongly held, and no German intention of
west of it, stalemate in the west, or the "Phoney War," as it came
must, in the absence of bombing of civilian populations ultimately peter out
one was quicker to perceive this than the pro-Jewish war mongers; and they and
friends inside and outside the House of Commons very soon began exerting
for this form of bombing of Germany to be started.
14th January, 1940, The Sunday Times gave prominence to a letter from
correspondent, who demanded to know why we were not using our air
"to increase the effect of the blockade."
in the same issue, commented on this letter as follows:
an extension of the offensive would inevitably develop into competitive
It might be forced on us in reprisals for enemy action, and we must
in a position to make reprisals if necessary.
the bombing of industrial towns, with its unavoidable loss of life among the
population -- that is what it would come to -- would be inconsistent with
spirit, if not the actual words of the pledges given from both sides at the
of the war."
above quotation is taken from a book entitled Bombing Vindicated, which
in 1944 by Mr. J. M. Spaight, C.B., C.B.E., who was the principal assistant
at the Air Ministry during the war.
its title suggests, this book is an attempt to justify the indiscriminate use
the civil population. In it Mr. Spaight boasts that this form of bombing
and reveals the startling fact that it was Britain that started this
form of war on the very evening of the day on which Mr. Churchill
Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940.
page 64 of his book, Mr. Spaight gives a further piece of information, which
this sudden change of British policy all the more astonishing; for he states
declaration was made by the British and French Governments on 2nd September,
strictly military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word would be
declaration, of course, was made in the days of Mr Chamberlain's Premiership;
no single fact perhaps could demarcate and differentiate more clearly the
in the character and behaviour between Mr. Chamberlain and Mr. Churchill.
the 27th January, 1940, thirteen days after the letter in The Sunday Times already
The Daily Mail endorsed editorially the views which had been expressed
issue by "Scrutator"; and it devoted a leading article, writes Mr.
the suggestion of Mr. Amery and others that we should start the bombing of
Duff Cooper had written on the previous day in the same paper that
would appear to exist a kind of unwritten truce between the two
according to the tacit terms of which they do not bomb one
view of the declaration by Britain and France of September 2nd, 1939, that
"only bomb military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word,"
verbiage about "a kind of unwritten truce," seems to me gravely
the House of Commons, the pro-Jewish war mongers were now becoming more
more intransigent; and more and more set on sabotaging the chances of turning
"phoney war" into a negotiated peace. This in spite of the fact that
to gain by further and total war, and everything to lose.
Jews, of course, had everything to lose by a peace which left the German
system and Jew-free Government intact, and nothing to gain.
seemed clearer to me every day that this struggle over the question of
was the crux of the whole matter; and that by this method of warfare alone
the Jews and their allies cut the Gordian knot of stalemate leading to peace;
later on to a joint attack on Jewish Bolshevism in Russia.
on 15th February, 1940, I put down the following question to the Prime
Ramsay asked the Prime Minister:
he will assure the House that H.M. Government will not assent to
suggestions made to them, to abandon those principles which led them
denounce the bombing of civilian populations in Spain and elsewhere,
embark upon such a policy themselves?"
Chamberlain himself replied in outspoken terms:
am unaware of the suggestions to which my honourable and gallant friend
The policy of H.M. Government in this matter was fully stated by myself in
to a question by the honourable Member for Bishop Auckland (Mr
on 14th September last.
the course of that answer I said that whatever be the length to which others
go, H.M. Government will never resort to the deliberate attack on women
children, and other civilians, for purposes of mere terrorism. I have nothing
add to that answer."
this question and the reply were evidently distasteful in the extreme to the
so I resolved to carry the matter a stage further. On 21st February I put
another question on the subject:
Ramsay asked the Prime Minister:
he is aware that the Soviet aeroplanes are carrying on a
of bombing civil populations, and whether H.M. Government
dispatched protests on the subject similar to those dispatched during
Civil War in Spain in similar circumstances?"
Butler replied for the Prime Minister:
Sir. The Soviet Air Forces have pursued a policy of indiscriminate
which cannot be too strongly condemned.
Government have not, however, lodged any protest, since there are
no grounds for supposing that such action would achieve the result
can be little doubt but that these two downright answers crystallised the
the war mongers to get rid of a Prime Minister whose adherence to an upright
policy must inevitably frustrate their plans, seeing that Hitler wished no war
Britain, and would therefore never start civilian bombing himself.
machinery of intrigue and rebellion against Mr. Chamberlain was set in motion.
he was saddled with the blame for the Norway blunder; and this pretext was
by the Churchillian-cum-Socialist caucus to secure his downfall.
should be remembered in this connection that prior to and during the Norway
Mr. Churchill had been invested with full powers and responsibilities for
Naval Military and Air operations; and if anyone therefore deserved to be
over that second Gallipoli (pursued in defiance of high naval authority
that, without control of the Cattegat and Skaggerack it could not possibly
it should have been the Minister responsible.
however was not only unbroken, he was acclaimed Prime Minister. The man who
tear up the British pledge of September 2nd, 1939, and start bombing the
of Germany was the man for the war mongers who now ruled the roost.
so civilian bombing [by England] started on the evening that the architect of
Norwegian fiasco became Prime Minister, viz., May 11th, 1940.
Liddell Hart, the eminent military critic, wrote a book on the military events
which was published in 1948, and entitled The Other Side of the Hill.
10 -- which deals with the German invasion of France down to and including
-- bears the somewhat startling title, "How Hitler beat France and saved
reading of the chapter itself will astound all propaganda-blinded people, even
than the title: for the author therein proves that not only did Hitler save
but that this was not the result of some unforeseen factor, or indecision, or
but was of set purpose, based on his long enunciated and faithfully maintained
given details of how Hitler peremptorily halted the Panzer Corps on the 22nd
and kept them inactive for the vital few days, till, in fact, the British
troops had got
from Dunkirk, Captain Liddell Hart quotes Hitler's telegram to Von Kleist:
armoured divisions are to remain at medium artillery range from Dunkirk.
is only granted for reconnaissance and protective movements."
Kleist decided to ignore the order, the author tells us. To quote him again:
came a more emphatic order, that I was to withdraw behind the canal. My
were kept halted there for three days."
the following words the author reports a conversation which took place on May
two days later) between Herr Hitler and Marshal Von Runstedt, and two key men
then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the
for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the
compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church -- saying they were
essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from
was that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the continent.
return of Germany's lost colonies would be desirable, but not essential, and
would even offer to support Britain with troops, if she should be involved in
concluded by saying that his aim was to make peace with Britain, on a basis
she would regard compatible with her honour to accept."
Liddell Hart comments on the above as follows:
the British Army had been captured at Dunkirk, the British people might have
that their honour had suffered a stain, which they must wipe out. By letting
Hitler hoped to conciliate them. This conviction of Hitler's deeper motive
confirmed by his strangely dilatory attitude over the subsequent plans for the
showed little interest in the plans," Blumentritt said, "and made no
up the preparation. That was utterly different to his usual behaviour.
the invasion of Poland, of France, and later of Russia, he repeatedly
them on; but on this occasion he sat back."
the account of his conversation at Charleville, and subsequent holding
comes from a section of the Generals, who had long distrusted Hitler's
that makes their testimony all the more notable."
later he goes on to say:
their account of Hitler's thoughts about England at the decisive
before Dunkirk, fits in with much that he himself wrote earlier in Mein
and it is remarkable how closely he followed his own Bible in other
who has read Mein Kampf will immediately appreciate the accuracy of the
statement. It is indeed if anything an understatement. Throughout that
book runs two main themes, as I have shown in an earlier chapter -- the
a detailed delineation and denunciation of the Jewish Capitalist-Revolutionary
the other, admiration for and eagerness for friendship with Britain and the
is a pity, indeed, that so few persons in this island have read this book for
and it is a tragedy that they have instead swallowed wholesale, the
distortions and untrue propaganda on the subject, served up to them by
publicity machinery, operating through our press and radio.
these people but try and obtain a copy of that book; and when they find they
let them reflect, that if indeed its contents confirmed the lies that they
been told concerning it and its author, the powers behind our publicity
ensure that everyone should be able to secure a copy at the cheapest
any event, I would urge my countrymen to ponder most earnestly the following
Jew Karl Marx laid it down, that Bolshevism could never really succeed till
British Empire had been utterly destroyed.
laid it down, that the British Empire was an essential element of stability in
and even declared himself ready to defend it with troops, if it should be
unscrupulous propaganda on an unprecedented scale this country was led into
those who wished to be her friends, and offered their lives to defend her;
exalting those, who proclaimed that her destruction was a necessary
the success of their ideology, forfeiting her Empire and her economic
Shape of Things To Come
the new-found knowledge of Hitler's anxiety to preserve the British Empire has
a surprise recently to many people in this country, it must surely have come
shock to them to learn that President Roosevelt, on the other hand, was its
enemy; that he was not only a pro-communist of Jewish origin, but that
he brought America into the war he made it clear that he wished to break up
son, Colonel Elliot Roosevelt, makes this last point very clear in his book, As
published in the U.S.A.
pages 19 to 28 of this book, Colonel Roosevelt tells us that in August 1941,
having given out to the American people that he was going off on a fishing
proceeded to a meeting with Mr. Churchill on board a warship in Argentia Bay.
Beaverbrook, Sir Edward Cadogan, and Lord Cherwell (Professor Lindeman of
race and nationality), and Mr. Averil Harriman were present, he says.
page 35 he quotes his Father as saying,
the war . . . there will have to be the greatest possible freedom of
. . . no artificial barriers."
Churchill referred to the British Empire Trade Agreements, and Mr. Roosevelt
Those Empire Trade Agreements are a case in point. It's because of them
the peoples of India, Africa, and of all the Colonial Near East are still as
as they are . . .
can't believe that we can fight a war against Fascist slavery, and at the same
not work to free people all over the world from a backward colonial
peace," said Father firmly, "cannot include any continued
insolent talk against the British Empire became so pronounced that on page 31
Roosevelt reports Mr.Churchill as saying,
I believe you are trying to do away with the British Empire."
comment was very near the mark, as the President had been talking about India,
Egypt, Palestine, Indo-China, Indonesia, and all the African Colonies having
page 115, the Colonel reports his Father as saying,
think for a moment, Elliot, that Americans would be dying in the Pacific
if it hadn't been for the short-sighted greed of the French, the British and
Dutch. Shall we allow them to do it all over again?"
were not at all the reasons, however, given for the war, and for which
thought they were dying; nor indeed does the President make any
as to the pretexts given to his countrymen for the war.
British, dying in greater numbers, have on the contrary been told that they
to defend their Empire from Hitler's wicked plans. Little do they suspect,
that it is
so-called ally who plans its destruction.
President is reported as saying, on page 116:
we've won the war, I will see that the U.S.A. is not wheedled into any
that will aid or abet the British Empire in its Imperialist ambitions."
a few pages later:
have tried to make it clear to Winston and the others . . . that they must
the idea that we are in it just to help them hang on to the archaic and
who sup with the devil need a long spoon. Mr. Churchill, the self-styled
architect of the Jews' future," now found himself playing second fiddle
more trusted architect; so eminent, in fact, that he did not make any silly
of respect for the British Empire.
earlier Moses, Karl Marx, had denounced the Empire long ago, and in the year
it was only foolish opponents of Judaism and Marxism, like Herr Hitler, who
to stand by that Empire, because they recognised it as a bulwark of Christian
as we have seen, Mr. Churchill is shown in this book as getting a little
from time to time over the President's pronouncements regarding the
of the Empire, this did not prevent him from announcing himself later to the
of Commons as "Roosevelt's ardent lieutenant."
what special circumstances the King's Prime Minister could be an ardent
of a Republican President, whose design it was to destroy that Monarch's
Mr. Churchill did not explain; nor has he yet done so.
another occasion, Mr. Churchill made an equally cryptic remark. He assured the
is no part of my duties, to preside over the liquidation of the British
indeed! Nor was it any part of his duties, on being told that it was to be
pronounce himself to be the ardent lieutenant of the would-be liquidator. Nor,
add, when Minister of Defence, with Admiralty and other codes at his disposal,
it any part of his duties, as Mr. Chamberlain's lieutenant, albeit not very
a personal correspondence of the nature which he did conduct with President
by means of the top secret code of the American Foreign Office.
my Statement to the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons concerning
detention (see Appendix 1) I summed up at the end of Part 1, the
led me to inspect the secret U.S. Embassy papers at Mr. Tyler Kent's flat in
weeks of Mr. Chamberlain's Premiership.
first two of these six considerations were as follows:
with many members of both Houses of Parliament, I was fully aware that
the agencies both here and abroad, which had been actively engaged in
bad feeling between Great Britain and Germany, organised Jewry, for
reasons, had played a leading part.
knew the U.S.A. to be the headquarters of Jewry, and therefore the real,
centre of their activities. It was not until 1948 that corroborative evidence
foregoing from unimpeachable American sources came into my hands; but when it
come, however, the authentic and fully documented character of the work left
to be desired.
refer to the book by Professor Charles Beard entitled President Roosevelt
of the War 1941,
which was published by the Yale University Press in April
This book, which comes with all the authority of its eminent author, is
than a tremendous indictment of President Roosevelt on three main issues.
that he got himself elected on the strength of repeated promises, to the
he would keep the U.S.A. out of any European war; secondly, that he
flagrantly disregarded not only his promises to the American people, but all
thirdly, that at a predetermined moment he deliberately converted
cold war, which he had been conducting, into a shooting war, by sending the
which no one could imagine could result in anything but
many instances given relating to the first issue, I quote one:
Boston on October 30th, 1940, he (F.D.R.) was even more emphatic, for
have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your
are not going to be sent into any foreign wars';
on December 29th:
can therefore nail any talk about sending armies to Europe as
Beard goes on to prove that while Mr. Roosevelt was making these
he was treating international laws of neutrality with total disregard, and in
interests only of those who were fighting the Jews' battles. The two main
intervention were the convoying of U.S. ships of ammunition and
for the allies, and the Lend Lease Act.
be our sentiments in appreciating the help of the U.S. arsenals and navy
these two cold war decisions of Mr. Roosevelt, no one can pretend that they
either in accordance with his pledges to the American people, or the
of international law regarding neutrality.
very plain speaking went on in Congress over these acts of the President's.
U. Burdick, of North Dakota, said:
our aid to Britain may mean anything . . . To sell her supplies is one thing .
sell her supplies and convoy them is another thing, to have actual war is the
thing -- the last thing is inevitable from the first thing!"
Hugh Paterson, of Georgia, said:
is a measure of aggressive war."
Dewey Short, of Missouri, said:
cannot be half-way in war, and half-way out of war . . . You can dress this
up all you please (Lend-Lease), you can sprinkle it with perfume and
powder on it . . . but it is still foul and stinks to high heaven."
Philip Bennett, of Missouri, declared:
conclusion is inescapable, that the President is reconciled to active military
if such intervention is needed to defeat the Axis in this war.
our boys are not going to be sent abroad, says the President.
Mr Chairman; even now their berths are being built in our transport
Even now the tags for identification of the dead and wounded are being
by the firm of William C. Ballantyne and Co., of Washington."
Beard proves the third point at great length, showing how at the appropriate
President Roosevelt forced the Japanese into war by an ultimatum
instant compliance with terms, which could never have been accepted by
memorandum which Senator Hull, with the approval of President Roosevelt,
to Japan on 26th November, 1941 . . . amounted to the maximum terms
an American policy for the whole Orient."
Professor Beard, and goes on to say:
required no profound knowledge of Japanese history, institutions, and
to warrant . . . first that no Japanese Cabinet 'liberal or reactionary,'
have accepted the provisions."
Japanese agent regarded the American memorandum as a kind of
This much at least Secretary Hull knew on November 26th."
was the period of maximum intervention short of a shooting war terminated, and
save-face forged for Roosevelt to ship U.S. boys overseas without apparently
the spirit of his many promises.
the war proceeded the real policy and sympathies of the President became more
more apparent. His deception of the British and their Allies was no less
his deception of the American people.
Professor Beard points out on page 576:-
noble principles of the Four Freedoms, and the Atlantic Charter were for
purposes discarded in the settlements, which accompanied the
and followed the conclusion of the war.
the validity of this statement the treatment of the people of Esthonia,
Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia, China, Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy,
and other places of the earth bear witness."
great driving force was clearly at work to induce a President of the United
have seen from a previous chapter that it was not the preservation of the
nor the French Empire, nor the Dutch, that swayed the President. On the
he had advised his ardent lieutenant, Mr. Churchill, at an early stage in the
war that these must be liquidated.
was not Europe, nor the countries of Europe, nor their liberties, nor rights
Charter of Four Freedoms which weighed with him.
know now that the British and American armies were actually halted by General
Eisenhower under Mr. Roosevelt's rulings at the Yalta Conference, so that the
of Jewish Bolshevism might overflow half Europe and occupy Berlin.
quote again from Professor Beard:
a consequence of the war called necessary to overthrow Hitler's despotism,'
despotism was raised to a higher pitch of power."
conclusion, Professor Beard condenses the many indictments of the President
in his book, into 12 major counts, and declares:
these precedents are to stand unimpeached, and to provide sanctions for the
conduct of America affairs -- the Constitution may be nullified by the
and officers who have taken the oath and are under moral obligation to
limited Government under supreme law they may substitute personal and
government -- the first principle of the totalitarian system against which
has been alleged that World War II was waged-while giving lip service to the
of constitutional government."
we reflect upon the astounding contents of Professor Beard's book, and
them in conjunction with the revelations in Colonel Roosevelt's As He Saw
question arises: whom, and which interests did President Roosevelt not betray.
this query I can only see one answer, namely, those people and their interests
from the start the use of United States arsenals and Forces to prosecute a
which would annihilate a Europe which had freed itself from Jewish gold and
control: people who planned to dissolve the British Empire, to forge
of unrepayable debt, wherewith to coerce Britain to this end; and to enable
to "bestride Europe like a colossus,"* in other words, International
very words were used by General Smuts, who added words to the effect that
welcomed such a prospect. It should be remembered that General Smuts was
chief legal adviser to the Zionist Organisation in S. Africa.
the 23rd May, 1940, within the first fortnight of Mr Churchill's Premiership,
of British subjects, a large proportion of them ex-Servicemen, were suddenly
and thrown into prison under Regulation 18B.
some days the entire press had been conducting a whirlwind campaign, in rising
against a supposed fifth column in this country, which was declared to be
to assist the Germans when they landed.
untrue this campaign was, is proved by the fact that our most competent
Service never produced the flimsiest evidence of any such conspiracy, nor
of any plan or order relating to it, nor the complicity in such an undertaking
single man arrested.
As you read this, consider the lies about alleged weapons of mass distruction
by Saddam Hussein (pdf
to justify the massacre in Iraq. There
none or they would have been used, yes? And remember G.W. Bush's comment
on, when he was declaring "war on terror": "If you aren't for
us, you are against
So those against the neverending war are suspected and accused of being
The more things change, the more they stay the same. - jackie]
such evidence been forthcoming, those implicated would undoubtedly have been
and tried, and very properly so. But there was not one case of a man arrested
18B being a British subject, who was so charged.
charges were actually framed against one lady, the wife of a distinguished
Mrs Nicholson. She was tried by a Judge and jury, and acquitted on all
This however, did not prevent her being arrested as she left the Law Courts,
and being thrown into Holloway Prison under Regulation 18B, where she
18B was originally introduced to deal with certain members of the I.R.A.,
were committing a number of senseless minor outrages in London. Without this
no liege of His Majesty in the United Kingdom could be arrested and held
prison on suspicion.
practice had long been abandoned in this country, except in short periods of
proven conspiracy, and on those occasions Habeas Corpus was always
enabled the medieval process of arrest and imprisonment on suspicion to be
without the suspension of Habeas Corpus. It was, in fact, a return to the
of Lettres de Cachet, by which persons in pre-Revolutionary France were
to the Bastille.
it should be remembered, that those persons enjoyed full social intercourse
families, and were allowed their own servants, plate, linen, food and drink
prison; a very different treatment to that meted out to persons held under
treatment for some time was little different from ordinary criminals, and, in
than any remand prisoner.
I.R.A. outrages were so fatuous in themselves and so apparently meaningless,
a time when there were no sharp differences between this country and the Irish
that I commenced making a number of inquiries.
was not surprised to discover at length, that special members of the I.R.A.
enrolled for the committing of these outrages; and that they were
had it on excellent authority that the Left Book Club of Dublin had been
in the matter; and finally the names of 22 of these men were put into my
and again I was informed on excellent authority that they were all
on receipt of this information I put down a question to the Home
and offered to supply the necessary information if the matter were taken up.
came of my representations. From these Communist-inspired outrages,
there resulted Regulation 18B.
And today, we get the U.S.A.Patriot Act, by the same methods, and for the
reason. To squelch truth and the truth-sayers. - j]
the I.R.A. were pleaded as an excuse to the House for a Regulation, hardly
of their members were ever arrested under it; but in due course it was
and hold for 4 or 5 years, uncharged, very many hundreds of British subjects,
one common denominator was that they opposed the Jewish power over this
in general; and its exertion to thrust her into a war in purely Jewish
Communism is Jewish-controlled.
Marxist Jewry needed a device for securing the assent of parliament to a
18B, what simpler method could there be to achieve this object, without
as to the real ulterior motive, than arranging for a few communist members
the I.R.A. to plant bombs in the cloakrooms of London stations?
is supposed to be entitled to their opinion in this country; and, furthermore,
we cannot supply absolute proof, we can say with the Home Secretary, as I do
that I have "reasonable cause to believe" that this is the real
the Clause was first introduced into the House, the original wording laid it
clearly that the Home Secretary should have the power to detain persons of
birth and origin "If he was satisfied that" such detention was
was, at least, crystal clear.
other opinion or check upon the Home Secretary's personal and absolute
was envisaged: a return, in fact and in very essence, to the Lettres de
and the Star Chamber. The House of Commons refused absolutely to accept
a clause, or hand away its powers of supervision, and its responsibilities as
of the rights and liberties of the citizen to any individual, be he Cabinet
Government accordingly had to withdraw the offending sentence; and brought
a second draft for approval some days later. In this new draft, drawn up, as
spokesmen laboured to explain, in accordance with the express wishes of
House, the necessary safeguard from arbitrary executive tyranny had been
the words "Home Secretary is satisfied that," had been substituted,
cause to believe that."
Government spokesmen explained at length on this occasion that this wording
the required safeguard. Members of Parliament were led to believe that their
had prevailed, and that they were to be the judges of what would or would not
"Reasonable Cause" for continued detention (as was proved in
and a rather uneasy House passed the Clause in this form, and on that
years later, when the Counsel of an 18B prisoner argued in Court along these
and demanded some sort of ventilation of his client's case before Members of
or a Court, no less a person than the Attorney-General himself pleaded on
Government's behalf, that the words "Has reasonable cause to believe
precisely the same as "Is satisfied that."
the matter had to rest as far as the Law Courts were concerned, though it was
subject of the most scathing comment of a most eminent Law Lord.
myself was arrested under this Regulation on 23rd May, 1940, and thrown into
Prison, where I remained in a cell until 26th September, 1944, without any
being preferred against me, receiving merely a curt notification from the Home
on the latter date that the order for my detention had been
paper of "Particulars" alleged as the reasons for my detention was
supplied to me
after my arrest. I replied to them during a day's interrogation by the
Committee, before which body I could call no witnesses, did not know who
my accusers, or the accusations they had made, and was not allowed the
of a lawyer.
particulars, together with my detailed reply to each, were set out in part II
I supplied later to the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons;
will be found in the Appendix of this book. They were based upon the untrue
that my anti-Communist attitude was bogus, and a cloak for disloyal
untrue this slander was can be easily proved from my previous ten years'
unceasing attacks on Communism, both by questions and speeches in the House of
the morning following my release from Brixton Prison, I proceeded to the House
at my usual hour of 10.15 a.m.; an action which appeared to cause no little
It was not long before Jews and their friends were on my trail, and that of
string of provocative questions soon appeared on the Order Paper; but, like
when the Jews took Sosthenes, and beat him before the Judgment seat,
none of these things," I gave no sign of interest. The reporters in the
were then turned on, to endeavour to extract from me some, at least, of the
in 'the Red Book' of the Right Club membership.
the names in the Red Book of members of the Right Club were, as the
have shrieked aloud, kept strictly private, with the sole object of
the names becoming known to the Jews. The sole reason for this privacy
the expressed wish of the members themselves.
me, personally, the keeping of the names secret was only a disadvantage. It
misrepresentation of every kind by my enemies; the publication of the
would have been of great assistance to me in every way. The sole reason for
stipulation on joining by so many members was the well-grounded fear of Jewish
of a serious nature.
remember in particular the conversation on this subject with one of these
the Press Gallery of the House of Commons. He was an engaging young man,
particularly importunate. Would I not let him have just a few of the names? I
your name had been amongst those in the Red Book; and supposing
in disregard of my promise to you not to reveal it, I proceeded to
it to the press; and supply that definite evidence that you were a
of a society to fight against Jewish domination over Britain: you would
keep your job with your paper for six months."
shouldn't keep it for six minutes," was the prompt reply.
I answered. "Now you can see why I can't give you the name of even
member of the Right Club from the Red Book. You yourself confirm their
hundreds of poor fellows find themselves in such a position today; indeed,
is merely a matter of expression. The real number must be prodigious. How
one might ask, can afford to run the risk to their livelihood, which is
it be known that they are aware of the Jewish grip and prepared to oppose it.
the wealthiest and most influential magnates of the land dare not brave the
organised Jewry as the story regarding the Daily Mail controlling
shares on pp. 6
7 of my statement to the Speaker shows. (See Appendix I.)
only in Britain has this been the case, but perhaps even more noticeably in
as the diaries of the late Mr James Forrestal prove.
Forrestal Diaries published by the Viking Press, New York, 1951, only reach me
this book goes to press. Coming from a man of high integrity, who was U.S.
Secretary from 1940, and Secretary for Defence from 1947 until his resignation
suspicious death a few days later in March 1949, they are of the utmost
The most important revelation therein is dated the 27th December, 1945
121 and 122):
golf today with Joe Kennedy (Joseph P. Kennedy, who was Roosevelt's
to Great Britain in the years immediately before the war). I asked
about his conversations with Roosevelt and Neville Chamberlain from 1938
said Chamberlain's position in 1938 was that England had nothing with which
fight and that she could not risk going to war with Hitler.
view: That Hitler would have fought Russia without any later conflict
England if it had not been for Bullitt's (William C. Bullitt -- a half-Jew --
to France)* urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939 that the
must be faced down about Poland; neither the French nor the British
have made Poland a cause of war if it had not been for the constant
he said, kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans wouldn't fight, Kennedy
they would, and that they would overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he said,
that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war."
Mr. Forrestal's information regarding the impulses behind the recent war
they have already had it from the outspoken statements of Mr. Oswald
former South African Defence Minister, who told the Associated Press on the
January, 1952, in Johannesburg that
had told him that he was under great pressure from World Jewry
to accommodate Hitler."
second most important revelation in the Forrestal Diaries concerns Zionism. It
from the entries, that by December, 1947, Mr. Forrestal was becoming greatly
by the intervention of the Zionists into American politics. He records
with Mr. Byrnes and Senator Vandenberg, Governor Dewey and others,
attempts to lift the Palestine question out of party politics. From this time
seem to have made continuous efforts with that end in view.
Diary records on the 3rd Feb., 1948 (pages 362 and 363):
today from Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr., who came in with strong advocacy of
Jewish State in Palestine, that we should support the United Nations
pointed out that the United Nations had as yet taken no 'decision', that it
a recommendation of the General Assembly and that I thought the methods
had been used by people outside of the Executive branch of the
to bring coercion and duress on other nations in the General
bordered closely onto scandal . . .
said I was merely directing my efforts to lifting the question out of
to have the two parties agree that they would not compete for votes on this
said this was impossible, that the nation was too far committed and that,
the Democratic Party would be bound to lose and the Republicans
by such an agreement.
said I was forced to repeat to him what I had said to Senator McGrath in
to the latter's observation that our failure to go along with the Zionists
lose the states of New York, Pennsylvania and California -- that I thought it
about time that somebody should pay some consideration to whether we
not lose the United States."
a short note by the Editor of the Diaries the entry for the 3rd Feb., 1948,
lunch with Mr. B. M. Baruch. After lunch raised the same question with him.
took the line of advising me not to be active in this particular matter, and
was already identified, to a degree that was not in my own interest, with
to the United Nations policy on Palestine."
was about this time that a campaign of unparalleled slander and calumny was
in the United States press and periodicals against Mr. Forrestal.So greatly
this appear to have affected him that in March 1949, he resigned from the U.S.
Secretaryship; and on the 22nd of that month was found dead as a result of a
from a very high window.
shall always be grateful to the many Members who made my return to the House
easier than it might have been, by their immediate greetings and friendly
I fear, whose actions in the Chamber itself and outside were detected or
to the press representatives, found themselves the victims of a vendetta
their constituencies and in the Press on that specific account.
we reflect upon these bloody happenings from the time of King Charles I to our
day, we can at long last find only one cause for satisfaction, if such a word
any way appropriate. It is that for the first time we can now trace the
which explain these hideous disfigurations in European history.
the light of present-day knowledge, we can now recognise and understand the
of these terrible happenings. Instead of mere disconnected occurrences,
can now discern the merciless working of a satanic plan; and seeing and
we are in a position to take steps in the future to safeguard all those
which we love and stand for; and which that plan clearly seeks to destroy.
can at last begin to oppose the planners and operators of that plan, knowing
and their technique, which till now have been known to them alone. In other
fore-warned, it is our fault if we are not fore-armed.
us not forget such words as those of the Jew Marcus Eli Ravage, who wrote in
in January 1928:
have stood back of, not only the last war, but all your wars; and not only the
but all of your revolutions worthy of mention in your history."
should we forget those of Professor Harold Laski, writing in the New
Nation on 11th
this war is in its essence merely an immense revolution in which the war of
the Russian Revolution, and the counter revolutions on the Continent are
the warning from that eminent Jewish American Attorney, publisher and
Klein, issued only last year:
The Protocols is the plan by which a handful of Jews, who compose the
aim to rule the world by first destroying Christian civilisation."
only are the Protocols genuine, in my opinion, but they have been almost
have indeed been largely fulfilled; no small measure of Jewish thanks being
Mr. Roosevelt and his "ardent lieutenant," the self-styled
"architect of the Jewish
the process, however, Britain and her Empire and, worse still, her good name
have been brought down to the dust. As Professor Beard wrote:
noble principles of the Four Freedoms and the Atlantic Charter were for
purposes discarded in the settlements which accompanied the progress
followed the conclusion of the war. In the validity of this statement the
of the people of Esthonia, Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia,
Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy, Germany and other places of the earth bear
appeared recently in the press the cry of Mrs. chiang Kai Shek calling Britain
weakling" (in reference to China). She is reported as saying:
has bartered the soul of a nation for a few pieces of silver. . . One day
pieces of silver will bear interest in British blood, toil, sweat and tears on
battleground of freedom."
might be General Sikorski himself speaking, might it not? In the same paper I
Mr. Jackson Martindell, president of the American Institute of Management, has
Englishman's word is no longer his bond".
often have I heard this from Arab sources since 1939? Mr. Martindell
hate to say this, but Britain is becoming poor morally as well as
Poland to Palestine and to China these words are re-echoed, and be it said,
by the Jew-wise section of this country for many years.
reason is not far to seek. No man can serve two masters, more especially when
principles and interests of these two masters are as widely divergent as are
Britain and her Empire, and Jewry and their Empire, the U.S.S.R.
since the fall of Mr. Chamberlain's Government, the interests of the Jewish
have been advanced as prodigiously as those of Britain and her Empire have
than all this -- should any dare to state the truth in plain terms-the only
is an accusation of anti-Semitism. As Mr. Douglas Reed has clearly shown,
term "anti-Semitism" is meaningless rubbish -- and as he suggests it
might as well
Arabs are Semites, and no so-called "anti-Semite" is anti-Arab.
is not even correct to say that he is anti-Jew. On the contrary, he knows
uninformed that a fair proportion of Jews are not engaged in this conspiracy.
only correct term for the mis-called "anti-Semitic" is
"Jew-wise". It is indeed the
fair and honest term.
phrase "anti-Semite" is merely a propaganda word used to stampede
public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without
so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow
"Jew-wise" know that we have in Britain a Jewish "Imperium in
Imperio," which, in
of all protestations and camouflage, is Jewish first and foremost, and in
with the remainder of World Jewry. If any doubt this they need only read Unity
issued in 1948 by the World Jewish Congress, which proclaims Jewry
be one nation.
all Jews here wish to be railroaded into this narrow social tyranny; but
affords them some way of escape they dare not take the risks -- very grave
-- of defying it: and so they perforce co-operate to some degree.
worse, certain Gentiles with no good excuse support this united force, which
used to influence or control our political parties, home and foreign policies,
unholy united front must be exposed and frustrated. One step towards this
would seem to be firstly an enactment to prevent Gentile Esaus from lending
hands for the carrying out of orders uttered by the voice of Jewish Jacobs.
the detachment from the Jewish United Front of Jews, who do not wish to
to the dictates of the World Jewish Congress. First and foremost however is
need to inform people of good will as to the truth of this matter,
to the real anatomy, aims, and methods of the Marxist enemy.
is to that end, that I humbly offer the contents of this book to all, who are
by Capt. Ramsay from Brixton Prison
the Speaker and Members of Parliament concerning his detention
Paragraph 18B of the Defence Regulations.
the particulars alleged as grounds for my detention are based on charges that
and activities in opposition to Communism, Bolshevism, and the policy of
Jewry were not genuine, but merely a camouflage for anti-British designs.
the following memorandum, which could be greatly expanded, I have given a
of facts, which prove that not only was my attitude genuine, open, and
during the whole of my time in the House of Commons, but that in the
of my researches I had accumulated numerous and conclusive facts
such an attitude, and leading logically to the formation of the Right Club, an
the whole of my time as M.P. (since 1931) I have kept up an open and
attack on Bolshevism and its allies. Indeed, I had already started this
long before I became an M.P.
following survey will show this; and also the eventual formation of the Right
the logical outcome of my work.
work falls into three phases.
the first, dating from soon after the Russian Revolution till about 1935, I
the powers behind Bolshevism to be Russian: In the second (1935-38) I
that they were International: By the third phase, I realised them to be
was always a mystery to me in Phase I why Russians spent so much time and
on revolutionary activities in Britain.
first active step was to speak in the election made famous by the publication
Mail of the
letter written by Zinoviev alias Apfelbaum, calling for revolution in
(I spoke against Bolshevism, and in the Northwich division.)
being elected in 1931, I joined the Russian Trade Committee, which kept a
their activities here. I also joined the Council of the Christian Protest
to protest against the outrages on priests, nuns, and the Christian churches
by the Bolsheviks. Hansard will show that I asked many questions during
period, attacking their activities in this country.
Phase II, I recognised the forces behind Bolshevism not to be Russian, but
tried to picture the composition of that mysterious body, the Comintern, over
to the replies to my Parliamentary questions, the Soviet Government could
the latter end of this phase I had made sufficient progress with this mental
Comintern, that I made it the subject of a number of addresses, which I gave
Clubs and other societies in London, Edinburgh, and elsewhere, entitling them
"Red Wings Over Europe."
second phase lasted well into the Spanish Civil War. Recognising almost at
guilt of the Comintern in the whole affair, down to the International Brigade,
them continuously by a stream of questions in the House.
attitude of the entire British national Press at first amazed, and
to enlighten me, as to the real powers behind World Revolution. The press
General Franco's enemies as liberal and Protestant reformers, instead
the anti-God international revolutionaries they were.
of the Russian Cheka were actually in charge of the prisons on the Red side.
established all the main facts in his pamphlet, Red Terror in Spain.
organised parades of sandwich-men at this time to expose the Bolshevik guilt
assisted a paper called The Free Press, and did what propaganda I
eighty or ninety M.P.s subscribed at one time or another to these efforts.
September 1937 I accepted the Chairmanship of the United Christian Front
on behalf of Sir Henry Lunn.
many thousands of letters were sent out over my signature to leading
in the Kingdom, appraising them of the true facts of the war in Spain, and
Christians of all communities to join in combating the Godless Red Terror,
Spain then, and thereafter all Europe, Britain included.
number of patriotic societies now began to co-operate regularly with me in
Bolshevism, including the National Citizens' Union, the British Empire League,
Liberty Restoration League, and the Economic League. We took to meeting
ina Committee Room of the House of Commons.
May 1936, when I set out to oppose the entry into this country of agents of
for attending the so-called Godless Congress, we were joined by the British
Union, the Order of the Child, and the British Israel World Federation.
information given me by these societies, I realized that the previous Godless
held at Prague, had brought under unified control all the National Free-
societies, who were now under the authority of the Militant Godless of Russia,
were therefore a subtle and potent weapon for Bolshevik propaganda.
our meetings to co-ordinate opposition, we all agreed that while it was
of British men and women to hold a Congress on any subject, this liberty
be construed into licence for international revolutionaries to develop their
destruction of the religious, social and public life of our country.
the 28th June, therefore, I introduced a Bill entitled the ALIENS' RESTRICTION
BILL, to prevent aliens from attending this Congress, or making it the
for the distribution of their blasphemous literature.
Bill received a first reading by 165 votes to 134. In the No Lobby were
G.R. Strauss, T. Levy, A.M. Lyons, Sir F. Harris, D.N. Pritt, W. Gallacher,
Haden Guest and Dr. Summerskill.
the autumn of 1938 I was made acquainted with the fact that the power behind
Revolution was not just a vague body of internationalists, but organized World
first document so convincing me was actually a British Government White Paper,
whose existence I had not been previously aware. This quoted verbatim an
a report received by Mr. Balfour on September 19th, 1918, from Mr. Oudendyke,
Netherlands Minister in Petrograd, who was at that time in charge of British
there, as follows:
danger is now so great, that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the
Government and all other Governments to the fact that if an end is not put
Bolshevism at once the civilization of the whole world will be threatened.
not an exaggeration, but a matter of fact . . .
consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue
the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless as
stated Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread
Europe and the whole world in one form or another, as it is organized and
by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object it is to destroy
their own ends the existing order of things.
only manner in which this danger can be averted would be collective action
the part of all the Powers."
as remarkable as the above quotation was the fact brought to my notice
namely, that this White Paper had been immediately withdrawn, and
by an abridged edition, from which these vital passages had been eliminated.
was shown the two White papers-the original and the abridged issue, side by
second document which came to my notice at this time was the booklet entitled,
Rulers of Russia,
written by Dr. Dennis Fahey, C.S.S.P., and bearing the
of the Archbishop of Dublin, dated the 26th March, 1938. In the opening
of this pamphlet Dr Fahey writes:
this pamphlet I present to my readers a number of serious documents which
to show that the real forces behind Bolshevism are Jewish forces; and that
is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment
their future Messianic kingdom."
Fahey then adduces an interesting volume of evidence. On page 1 he gives also
following passage by Mr. Hilaire Belloc, taken from the latter's Weekly, dated
for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary Bolshevist
in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is
in by the suppression of our deplorable Press."
authorities quoted in the pamphlet include Dr. Homer, D. Sc., Count Leon de
in his Contre-Revolution, and evidence given on 12th February, 1919,
Committee of the United States Senate by the Rev. George A. Simons,
of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Petrograd from 1907 to October
Rev. Mr. Simons stated on this occasion with regard to the Bolshevik
December 1918 . . . under the Presidency of a man known as Apfelbaum
. . . out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, and
the rest (with the exception of one man, who is a Negro from North America)
Jews . . . and 265 of these Jews belonging to this Northern Commune
that is sitting in the old Smolny Institute come from the Lower East
of New York -- 265 of them."
page 8 Dr Fahey quotes figures showing that in the year 1936:
Central Committee of the Communist Party in Moscow, the very centre of
Communism, consisted of 59 members, of whom 56 were Jews,
the other three were married to Jewesses . . . "
present ruler of Russia, is not a Jew, but he took as his second wife the
year old sister of the Jew L.M. Kaganovitch, his right-hand man, who
been spoken of as his probable or possible successor. Stalin's every
is made under Jewish eyes."
addition to these documents there now reached me a quantity of evidence
Jewish activities in Great Britain in the shape of subversive organizations
every description, anti-religious, anti-moral, revolutionary, and those
the Jewish system of financial and industrial monopoly.
I became finally convinced of the fact that the Russian and Spanish
the subversive societies in Britain, were part and parcel of the one and the
secretly operated and controlled by World Jewry, exactly on the lines laid
the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, filed in the British Museum in 1906
reproduced soon after the last war by The Morning Post, and from which this
Protocols are no forgery, and I and others could supply evidence to that
would convince any impartial Tribunal.
the next meeting of the patriotic and Christian societies, I felt in duty
the Jewish question; and realized, very soon, that there had come a parting of
ways. With very few exceptions our co-operation ceased.
realized that if anything was to be done, some special group would have to be
while retaining the essential characteristics of the former one, would take up
of opposing and exposing the Jewish menace. It was then that the idea of the
Club originated, though the actual formation did not actually come about till
months later, in May 1939.
the autumn of 1938 onwards, I spent many hours a week talking to backbenchers
members of the Government alike on these subjects.
very magnitude of the issues involved put many off. One particular rejoinder
in my recollection this sort of attitude:
that is all very disturbing, awful, in fact: but what is one to do about it? I
go off now and try and forget all about it as soon as possible."
the end of 1938, news was brought to me that the control shares of the Daily
were for sale.
that a severe advertisement boycott had been put in operation against the
following upon its having printed two or three articles giving what in
eyes had been a pro-Franco view of the Spanish War (in reality, the
the news was no great surprise to me.
I find a buyer? I decided to approach a certain very wealthy and patriotic
head of a great business. A mutual friend arranged an interview.
introduction I gave a survey of the activities and power of Organized Jewry in
and of their secret publicity control in Britain in particular, as I saw it.
after some 70 minutes, general concurrence in my views was expressed.
the mutual friend and I tried to persuade our hearer to buy the said shares
"tear the gag off the conspiracy of silence." He replied:
daren't. They would bring me to a crust of bread. If it was only myself, I
mind; I'd fight them. But many of my shares are held by the widow and
orphan, and for their sakes I must refuse."
our expressing astonishment that Jewry could inflict such crushing retaliation
of his financial strength and industrial power, and so conspicuous a national
he gave us details of just such retaliation directed against him by Organized
some years previously.
had refused to comply with some demands they had made of him affecting his
After a final warning, which he ignored, a world boycott had been started
him, which had become effective in 24 hours, wherever he had agents or
Fires and strikes also mysteriously occurred. The resulting losses had finally
him to give in.
24 hours the boycott was lifted all over the world.
consistent mis-reporting of important features in the Spanish Civil War had
many M.P.s. They felt that a bias so extreme, so universal, and so
always against Franco, indicated the existence of some deliberate plan,
though unwilling to agree my thesis, that the Jews were operating this control
means, and that the whole affair was part of their World Plan, nevertheless
felt that something was very wrong somewhere.
the course of these conversations I obtained the support of Members of all
the Bill I was preparing in this connection.
December 13th, 1938, I introduced the Bill entitled COMPANIES ACT
BILL, which made it compulsory for shares in Newspapers and News
to be held in the actual names of the holders, instead of the names of
as is done now in the majority of cases.
Bill received a First Reading by 151 votes to 104. In the Aye Lobby were
all parties, including 13 Right Hon. Gentlemen 98 of these Socialists).
the No Lobby were messrs. Rothschild, Schuster, Shinwell, Cazalet, Gallacher,
Sinclair, Gluckstein, and Mr. Samuel Storey opposed, also blocked the Bill;
suitable for that role.
now took the decision to proceed at once with the formation of a group similar
to the group of representatives of Christian and patriotic societies, which I
worked with up to the emergence of the Jewish problem; but this time a group
would place opposition to that menace in the forefront of its activities.
Cross was the Secretary, and the late duke of Wellington, President of the
League, was the Chairman at most of the few meetings we held. The first
of the Right Club was to enlighten the Tory Party and clear it from any Jewish
Jewry was now clearly out for World War. The failure of their International
in Spain, and the growing exposure of themselves, and the consequent risk of
collapse of their plan rendered immediate war from their point of view
July 1939 I had an interview with the Prime Minister. I dealt with the Russian
and the part Jewry had played in it; and with the Spanish Revolution,
and carried out on similar lines by much the same people; with the
societies in Britain, and the Press and news control existing in this country.
finally drew the Prime Minister's attention to the underground work that was
the object of overthrowing his peace policy and himself, and precipitating the
chamberlain considered that charges of so grave and far-reaching a character
require very substantial documentary proof. I decided to collect documentary
which would make it possible for action to be taken.
outbreak of war enabled the Jews to give their activities the cloak of
press power enabled them to portray those opposing their designs and exposing
as pro-Nazi, and disloyal to Britain.
difficulty I was faced with was that while I was in duty bound to warn the
the consequences of a policy influenced by Organized Jewry and opposed to
interests, I, at the same time, did not want to create difficulties for Mr.
was decided therefore, that the Right Club should close down for the duration.
of the Club naturally led the younger members to join the Services, wherein
served with distinction on most fronts. It was in keeping with the same spirit
not so engaged, should continue to fight the internal enemy, no less
the Axis Powers and in a way more dangerous, owing to his secret methods and
fact that he can work from within as well as from without.
this end, therefore, I and others in an individual capacity disseminated on
leaflets of mine called Do You Know? and Have You Noticed?; my verses
"Land of dope and Jewry", and some anti-Jewish stickers. This was
of educating the public sufficiently to maintain the atmosphere in which the
war, as it was called, might be converted into an honourable negotiated
was certainly not defeatist, as Jewish propaganda tried to make out. It was
not we of
Right Club who were holding back from the fighting Services in this war, any
in that last; quite the contrary.
was determined to make further efforts to convince Mr. Chamberlain, and even
the 1922 Committee, of the truth of my case, and thus avert total war, and
reinforcing the documentary evidence already in my possession.
January 1940, I had details of nearly thirty subversive societies working on
and corrosive lines, and had completed a very large chart, showing the
members of each.
names stood out clearly, as a sort of interlocking directorate. They were
Mr. Israel Moses Sieff, Prof. Herman Levy, Mr. Victor Gollancz, Mr. D.N.
and Mr. G.R. Strauss, M.P.
February 1940, on my arrival in London, I was handed the literature of a new
were advocating FEDERAL UNION. The list of supporters' names was startling. It
have been copied from the chart I had just completed. There could be no
as to the source of this scheme. Later, when this group became active, I put
the following questions:
Ramsay asked the Prime Minister whether he could assure the House
the creation of a Federal Union of the European States is not one of the war
of H.M.'s Government.
Butler (on May 9th) gave a non-committal reply. To this I asked the following
Ramsey: Is my right Hon. Friend aware that this plan, if adopted, will
hostility against us in almost the whole of Europe, who look upon it as the
up of a Judeo-Masonic super-State?
-- The Protocols of the Elders of Zion make it clear that World Jewry and
Masonry will set up just such a regime after the Gentile States have been
by War and Revolutions to hewers of wood and drawers of water.)
Butler: I would rather leave my Hon. Friend's interpretation of this plan to
virulent Press campaign was now in full swing to suppress
"Anti-Semitic" views and
by declaring that "Anti-Semitism" was pro-Nazi. Fearing less the
might be inclined into this direction, which was a false direction, I asked
May 9th, 1940:
Ramsay: Whether he will give an assurance that care will be taken,
in the administration of the present regulations, and in framing revised
that a distinction is made between anti-Semitism and pro-Nazism?
J. Anderson: I hope that any restrictive measures applied to organized
may in practice be confined to such propaganda as is calculated to
the war effort; and from that point of view I cannot recognize as relevant
distinction which My. Hon. and Gallant Friend seeks to draw.
Ramsay: while think my Right Hon. Friend for his reply, in view of the
that he seems somewhat confused on this point, will he assure the House
he refuses to be stampeded into identifying the two things by a ramp in our
J. Anderson: There is no question of my being stampeded into anything.
was in the last weeks of Mr. Chamberlain's Premiership that I was enabled to
some of the U.S. Embassy papers at Mr. Kent's flat. This then was the
and these were the considerations which led me to inspect them.
-- Together with many members of both Houses of Parliament, I was fully aware
the agencies here and abroad, which had been actively engaged in promoting
feeling between Great Britain and Germany, Organized Jewry, for obvious
had played a leading part.
-- I knew the U.S.A. to be the headquarters of Jewry, and therefore the real,
apparent, centre of their activity.
-- I was aware that Federal Union was the complement in international affairs
of Political and Economic Planning (P.E.P.). The Chairman of P.E.P. is Mr.
Moses Sieff, who is also Vice-Chairman of the Zionist Federation and Grand
of the Order of Maccabeans) designed to bring about Bolshevism by
in the sphere of industry and commerce, and that it must be regarded as the
which is one of the principal objectives of International Jewry.
-- I recognized that plans for establishing Marxist Socialism under Jewish
country were far advanced. As to their intentions, there could be no doubt.
-- I knew that the technique of International Jewry is always to plan the
junctures of any national leader who seriously opposes some essential part of
designs, as for instance Mr. Chamberlain had done by adhering to his policy of
and that in this case Mr. Chamberlain's fall would precipitate total war. I
that Mr. Lloyd George had said in the House of Commons, that if we
let in for a war over Poland without the help of Russia, we should be walking
trap. We walked into that trap.
information as to its origin, design, and ultimate objective, would have
Mr. Chamberlain's hand, and would have enabled him to take the
a Member of Parliament, still loyal to Mr. Chamberlain, I considered it my
the 9th or 10th of May I went to Scotland for a fortnight's rest, having seen
part of the documents, and intending to resume my investigations on my return.
I could conclude them, however, Mr. Chamberlain had fallen from office, and I
arrested a few days later on the steps of my house, when I returned to London
23rd May, 1940.
am appending the Particulars, alleged as Reasons for my detention, and my