JEWISH PERSECUTION

TOOL of the International Zionists' Plan for World Dominion

Part One

by Jackie Patru

___________________________________________________

Introduction by: Steven Jacobson

     The Orwellian world of mind control is a present day reality.

    Few realize the extent to which society is manipulated and controlled by unseen forces.  So much of what we know is programmed and indoctrinated into us at an early age, that many people do not give any thought to why they believe some of the things that they believe.

    "No lie can live forever", said Egyptologist and poet Gerald Massey. "They must find it difficult, those who have taken authority as truth, rather than truth as authority".

    People can be led to believe something that is not true when information is carefully timed, presented by a respected authority and repeated over and over again to establish a conditioned response.  The essence of psychological warfare is to confuse the meaning of words and infiltrate the mind with conflicting concepts.

    'Newspeak' and 'doublethink' are of particular interest when considering the subject of Jackie Patru's eye-opening, thought-provoking and meticulously-researched summary study on "Jewish Persecution".

   Undoubtedly, there will be those who will label this important work "anti-Semitic" as a distraction to draw attention away from its many insights that contribute to our understanding.  

   The Jew has long been an enigma to himself and the world -- a condition orchestrated by a corrupt priesthood from behind the scenes.  

   Having been born a Jew, I became acutely aware of the enigma of being a Jew and the hostile conditioned response of many non-Jews towards the Jew, perpetuating a vicious cycle of pitting one group against another as a mechanism of people control.

   This is a classic example of the Hegelian dialectic in practice where a problem is created and crisis-managed to a pre-determined resolution. All this is brought into sharp focus in this examination of the increasing influence of Talmudic Judaism in America and the world to the detriment of Jew and non-Jew alike.

   Jesus was highly critical of the religious authorities of his day for corrupting the truth with the spirit of materialism. The Jews, under the propaganda of the Pharisees, were expecting a political messiah to deliver them. They did not understand the spiritual nature of the kingdom of God to be found within one's very self as a present reality.

   Today, under the guise of Christianity, there is the expectation for a political messiah to establish and rule over an earthly, material kingdom, thus promoting world government under a different name as the kingdom of God on earth.

   Our true identity is spirit-soul regardless of any material designation or label according to the external circumstances of the physical body and the culture and religion into which we happen to be born.  

   We are not the physical body. We are the spirit-soul within the physical body. Therein lies our predicament: we are eternal spiritual beings inside temporary physical bodies that are subject to death.

   After reading Jackie Patru's "Persecution of the Jews", consider this thought: Spiritual consciousness is the only solution to problems created by material consciousness. When men practice the highest ideal of religion -- love of God -- there can be no conflict.

Steven Jacobson

Author of the audio documentaries: "Mind Control in America" and "Wake Up America"

 

_______________________________

 

 

Dedication

     Nesta Webster was a credible and respected historian. That is a fact.

    About two years ago I pulled a small, forty-page book off the shelf that had been collecting dust for more than a year. The book title is Germany and England, by Nesta Webster which began the process of dispelling the myths surrounding WWII, and most especially the real reason Adolph Hitler was hated by the International Bankers; so hated that they decided in 1933 that "Germany must be destroyed".  

    I came by way of the book from a newly made friend as a result of the Sweet Liberty radio broadcast that I've hosted for several years.

    That small book was the beginning of a new phase in my lifelong search for 'truth and understanding', and my then new friend has since become an integral part of my life. We've laughingly considered that maybe we first met in that great library beyond this dimension. My love of reading, learning, knowing and understanding is surpassed only by hers.

    While my search has always been of a spiritual nature, little did I know that a worldwide political plan cloaked in religion was the force that necessitated my search in the first place, for part of the plan itself is a form of spiritual vampirism. That is to say: spiritual truth known by the ancients has been blocked from our awareness by our religions, and in its place has been planted a perceived separation between us - each of us - and our Creator.  

    Miss Effie Burnthorn had the presence of mind as a young woman to purchase and read many historical books most of us didn't even know existed. Why have we not known? Because no Zionist controlled publishing house would touch them. Most all of them are available today, thanks to courageous and dedicated Americans who dare to publish and make them available.

     I am honored to have become the recipient of Miss Effie's treasures; somehow she knew that one day I would discover the wealth of information awaiting my perusal and 'do something'. The faith she placed in me by placing the books in my hands is the honor she bestowed upon me. I dedicate this work to her with deep affection and gratitude, for without her, it would never have happened. Thank you Effie 'May', from the bottom of my heart.  

     Your devoted friend  -- Jackie --

P.S. My thanks also to all of our listeners and friends who've sent books and material that have added to the treasure chest of truth and filled in many gaps. -- J

 

 

_____________________________________________________________

 

Preface

     This preface must be prefaced with my promise to you, our reader, whatever religion you embrace: You will not be reading an anti-Semitic diatribe. You will be reading about the Jews, the Zionists, the Judeo-Christians, and the machinations of an Ancient Priesthood that have brought about the entire oxymorinic controversy, along with the resultant divisiveness and chaos necessary to clear the pathway for their plan of destruction and slavery for us all. With that said let us begin, together.

   My mom used to sit for hours in the evening crocheting beautiful, intricate doilies. From time to time she would stop to study her work-in-progress. It was laid flat, examined as a whole, then small areas at a time were closely scrutinized and finally rows and stitches were counted. Sometimes a mistake would be found several rows back. After a mild expletive, mom would sigh deeply and begin unravelling her tedious work. I watched her many times take hold of a thread - one certain thread - and begin to pull. In a matter of just a few moments her long hours of patient work were quickly 'undone'.

   I've often thought that the web of lies and deceit, manipulation of minds, the process of planning, intrigue, blackmail, bribery, murder, suicides, all the myriads of agencies, councils, organizations and secret societies, central banks, world banks, governments, parliaments, constitutions, religions and the resulting wars... the whole scheme of the long-laid plans to bring about a single World Government is not unlike the doilies mom so lovingly created.

    However, the plan of which I speak was not lovingly conceived. It has been coldly, dispassionately and methodically contrived over the centuries by an unseen force whose aim is to despotically rule planet Earth and its people.

   How does this ambitious enterprise compare to mom's doilies? Several years ago a thought drifted into my mind, took root and refuses to be budged: that is that there is a thread - a single thread - which will, when we find it, begin unravelling the intricate plan as effortlessly as mom's doilies were undone.

   Maybe the undoing of this plan depends upon our ability to 'see' it for what it is; to discern truth from the lies, and liars from truth sayers. Maybe, the single thread we're seeking is simply the truth. This work is an effort to begin the unravelling process, for myself and its readers.

   We've interspersed herein relevant excerpts from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

   As Douglas Reed (Controversy of Zion - 1956) stated in his chapter titled, Protocols, regardless their source, the Protocols should be read for content. We excerpt here a brief explanation from Reed's chapter as a foundation for the uncanny fulfillment of the writings, whoever its authors be.

". . . in 1905 one Professor Sergius Nilus, an official of the Department of Foreign Religions at Moscow, published a book, of which the British Museum in London has a copy bearing the date-stamp, August 10, 1906.

One chapter was translated into English in 1920. [by Victor E. Marsden, Late Russian Correspondent of The Morning Post in England] This calls for mention here because the original publication occurred in 1905; although the violent uproar only began when it appeared in English in 1920. This one chapter was published in England and America as "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion".

. . . it is of inestimable importance, for it is shown by the conclusive test (that of subsequent events) to be an authentic document of the world-conspiracy first disclosed by Weishaupt's papers.

. . . this one transcends all of them. It accurately depicts all that has come about in the fifty years since it was published, and what clearly will follow in the next fifty years unless in that time the force which the conspiracy has generated produces the counter-force.

   Americans have been dragged into another neverendingwar against another illusory, unconquerable, enemy. Today the declared 'enemy' is TERRORISM; however, unlike the neverendingwars on Poverty, Crime, Drugs and Hate, America's New War is overtly militaristic in nature. The current president has declared this war; it was not initiated by a constitutional act of Congress.

   Sadly, we note that since WWII over 200 wars have been fought by U.S. Soldiers, every such mission having been carried out under the guise of UN 'peacemaking', or 'peacekeeping' with a glaring disregard for the loss of human lives and the Supreme Law of this land - the Constitution for the united States of America.

   UN Blue has become the color of death for the victims of 'peace' whose lives have been carelessly, thoughtlessly snuffed out; each death leaving a black stain on the souls of those US/UN Forces who 'just follow orders'.  

   Prior to WWII - before the U.S. joined the United Nations Organization - it was clearly understood by Americans and foreign governments alike that only the U.S. Congress could declare war. This understanding was expressed in a speech by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on December 8, 1941, as Britain was declaring war on Japan:

"The President told me that he would this morning send a message to Congress, which of course as you all know is the instrument, the constitutional instrument, by which alone a United States declaration of war can be made..."  Voices of History 1941

    In view of the extra-constitutional power assumed by U.S. presidents since World War II - all subsequent wars having been executed by presidential executive orders or 'directives' - one might reasonably conclude that the 'constitutional instrument' had been duly amended. In the case of war-making power that conclusion would be incorrect. So then, what happened? In Protocol No. 10 we read:

"In the near future we shall establish the responsibility of presidents.

Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war."

"We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defense of the new republican constitution..." Protocol No. 10

    In two separate conversations - with Brian Merchant in 1994 and Bill Leary in 1996 - with the National Security Council, we were informed that: presidential executive orders are 'not law'; presidential executive orders do not 'become' law; and 'there is no legal or criminal penalty for failure to obey an executive order'.

    Brian Merchant claimed that the president controls the military because he is 'Commander and Chief of the Army and Navy'. In response to the reminder that under the Constitution the president does not become Commander and Chief of the Army and Navy until 'called into the service of the United States' by a Congressional declaration of war, Merchant casually remarked:

"However, under International Law, PEACEKEEPING IS NOT DEFINED AS WAR."

   George Orwell's book, 1984, explains the slight-of-hand (or slight-of-mind) maneuvers which effected this sudden shift in unconstitutional presidential power. It's called NewSpeak which leads to NewThink, or more aptly NoThink. In a Logocracy, the perfection of the language is essential to the perfection of the system. As Syme, the language expert, told Winston Smith, in 1984:

"The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect.

...even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan 'freedom is slavery' when even the concept of freedom has been abolished?" 

   Eric Blair, using the pen name George Orwell, knew of which he wrote in his book, first published in 1949. He died immediately thereafter, by the way. We find the confirmation again in Protocol No. 3:

"The word freedom' brings out the communities of men to fight against every kind of force...

For this reason we, when we come into our kingdom, shall have to erase this word from the lexicon of life..."

   And again from Protocol No. 12:

"The word 'freedom', which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows: -- Freedom is the right to do that which the law allows."       

   A new language has slowly and insidiously been introduced into our very minds: definitions of old words changed and many words dropped altogether along the way. Gay no longer means joyful and happy. The definition of tolerance, though, still means 'accepting that which is known to be wrong; accepting what is unacceptable'. The definition, however, was not checked in the most current dictionaries.

   The sabotage of our nation's language, ethics, morals, character... along with the Constitution was planned long ago, and it could never have happened had we, the people remained vigilant, involved in the governmental process at the local and state level where true government in this country begins.

   Regardless the alien traitors in the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government or foreign interests installed in administrative, bureaucratic and diplomatic seats of power, sovereign states then and now have had the Constitutional power to instruct U.S. Senators and Congressmen. Along with the power to instruct comes the authority to recall U.S. Senators who are not voting as instructed by their respective state governments.

   The power of instruction begins with we, the people, first instructing our local officials. Since local laws reflect state laws, we must also instruct our state elected representatives, keeping them mindful that all laws must always be pursuant to the Constitution, without liberal interpretation. We, the people, present our instructions to them and they in turn are to re-present those instructions to the federal officials. That's the real meaning of the word representative and that's the pecking order under the Constitution for the united States of America.

   Legal 'experts' have promulgated the lie that upon the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the Constitution, states lost the power to recall U.S. Senators. In fact, the 17th Amendment changed nothing except the method of electing U.S. Senators -- that is, by direct vote of the people (popular vote) rather than selection by their respective state legislatures.

   And, in further fact, according to a U.S. Senate report the 17th Amendment was never fully ratified by the required number of states; such was also the case in the matter of the 16th Amendment. Philander Knox, then Secretary of State, simply 'declared' both amendments ratified each in their turn. An investigation at that time by any state legislature would have and could have saved the people of this nation from the resultant unceasing hardships created by those acts of treason.

   Unfortunately, the majority of state legislators are not aware of their Constitutional authority, power and duty. Many legislators - most of them Senate and House leaders and committee chairs - have succumbed to the lure of money and personal power whose instructions the rank and file legislators follow without question.    

   America's 'New War', while being waged in a military fashion - leaving in its wake the dead bodies of untold thousands of innocent people along with installation of new puppet rulers and rump governments - is simultaneously being waged politically against Americans. Afghanistan already has a new leader and a new government, courtesy of U.S./UN Zionist-controlled governmental puppets.

   The political battlefields in America are within state and local government borders. The political enemy of Americans? Elected officials who have been and are now rubber-stamping/passing laws, which by their own admission they do not write nor 'have time' to read, and which will ultimately prove to be as deadly as the weapons of mass destruction used by the military crowd. People live and die by legislation.

"... and no one outside ourselves will any longer direct the force of legislation."  Protocol No. 10

   Particularly dangerous are the 'Emergency Health Powers Acts' already introduced in most of the states, that would unconstitutionally give the governors authority to declare 'state emergencies'. Under these Acts, the Governors will then delegate nearly limitless powers over every aspect of our lives to appointed bureaucrats.

   Along with that deadly Act are the myriads of state Terrorism bills which are redefining the word terrorism, changing existing crimes (felonies and misdemeanors) to 'acts of terrorism'. In one state's terrorism bill, assault - both 1st and 2nd degree - are considered terroristic acts. In another, theft is now considered terrorism. Penalties range from imprisonment to property seizure.

   As part of this new version of insanity little children are now being labeled 'terrorists'. The Washington Times Weekly, April 1-7, 2002, featured an article titled 'Schools don't play around when boys play cops and robbers" informed its readers that:

"Two second-grade students in New York... were suspended and criminally charged with making terrorist threats for pointing paper guns and saying, 'I'm going to kill you'..."

   Children in the second grade are seven and eight years old. They are still babies, and they are being criminally charged with making terrorist threats! The new 'domestic terrorists' will be anybody who openly expresses opposition to the senseless mass slaughter and who resists the coming tyranny within our gates.

   Additionally, all states are in the process of promulgating legislation to introduce new methods of taxation. In Pennsylvania alone, for the 2001-02 session over 600 pending bills address taxation. There are bills to take control of water usage, monitoring wells and levying fines for overuse. Others will further the process of regionalization, erasing political borders at the local, state and national levels, in preparation for the World Government; a 'world without borders' - Imagine that.

   This new neverendingwar on Terror, an extension of the World Revolution which in our time began in earnest with the bloody French Revolution in 1789, is intended to be the final conflict to consummate the centuries-old political program for WORLD DOMINION -- a political program which has been cloaked for at least twenty-five centuries in the religion of the Talmudists.

   World Dominion means exactly that: DOMINION OVER THE WORLD... every square inch of land; the treasures which lie beneath the earth and in the oceans; every drop of water; the very air we breath; and most importantly every single aspect of the lives, minds, hearts and souls of every single person in this world.

   Do you doubt it? Consider this: While we could survive without the earthly treasures, no physical being can survive without wholesome natural food, fresh water and clean air.

   FOOD is being genetically modified which will necessitate a natural mutation of the physical body for its continued survival. In addition to the genetic engineering otherwise health-giving foods and meat are being irradiated. New rules and regulations are being promulgated that would curtail the availability of home organic gardeners to use non-hybrid seeds. Everyone must be caught in their net.

   We've just been informed by Reuters Health (May 10, 2002) that scientists have grown genetically modified carrots that contain the vaccine against hepatitis B. Soon we will be getting our vaccinations at the grocery store. Maybe we already are.

   Who controls the food controls the people. This is a fact well known by the minions within the United Nations, as Catherine Bertini, Director of the UN World Food Program boldly announced at the Beijing Woman's Conference (September, 1995):

"Food is power. We use it to change behavior. Some may call that bribery. We do not apologize".

   Bertini's credentials precede her UN position, as a former Confidential Assistant to New York State Governor Nelson Rockefeller. In The Next Million Years, (1952) by Charles Galton Darwin, grandson of evolutionist Charles R. Darwin, the objective is made quite clear:

"It is in the biological sciences that the most exciting possibilities suggest themselves... I will only speculate on a few among these possibilities which might have great effects on human life.

I have already referred to the possibility of quite new sources of food and I need not enlarge on that further.

... hormones, those internal chemical secretions which so largely regulate the operations of the human body. The artificial use of hormones has already been shown to have profound effects on the behaviour of animals... might have similar effects on man...

might be a drug, which... removed the urgency of sexual desire, and so reproduced in humanity the status of workers in a beehive.

To produce effects of these kinds there must be a master and the master must be above and not subject to the procedure he is enforcing on his subjects."

   Do you believe the elite are consuming genetically modified food? England's Prince Charles is an avid natural food advocate. No genetically engineered and irradiated food for the masters. No way!

   Could the rush to forced vaccinations -- one of the powers itemized in the states' Emergency Health Powers Acts, among other motives -- be a step in reducing humans to the status of worker bees?

"But you yourselves perfectly well know that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations [UN] it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relation with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture; by starvation; by the inoculation of diseases, by want, so that the people see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else." Protocol No. 10

  WATER for over a decade now, has been intentionally contaminated with the known carcinogen MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether), a gasoline additive mandated by the EPA ostensibly to facilitate a cleaner-burning fuel.

  MTBE is extremely soluble in water, so the slightest leak from gas tanks or spills causes the MTBE to separate from the gasoline and find its way into the water tables. Its half-life is fifty years; the contaminant has found its way into the water in every single state; and the EPA was notified as early as 1989 of its threat to human life. That is why we assert that the water has been intentionally contaminated.

   At this writing Alabamians are somewhat safer because that state's legislature banned the use of MTBE from the outset. That fact alone demonstrates the power state governments wield under the Bill of Rights. The Federal EPA 'mandated' the addition of MTBE and the state government of Alabama simply said: "No thank you."

   Fresh clean drinking water is almost nonexistent today, thus creating a situation which enables international water conglomerates easier access to its control. From Scripps Howard News Service, 12-26-01 we read:

Private industry's gold rush on for water rights - by Joan Lowy

"Water will be to the 21st century what oil was to the last - vast fortunes will be made by controlling it and nations will go to war to preserve access to it.

In a world in which fresh water is increasingly scarce, that axiom is being taken to heart in the boardrooms of some of the globe's most powerful corporations.

In Nearly every corner of the planet, international water conglomerates are vying to sign operating contracts, make deals, buy rights and acquire local water supply and treatment companies. It's a worldwide water rush."

   The author's assertion that 'nations will go to war to preserve access to water' raises a question: Is she a modern-day prophet? Or does she have access to inside information? Is there another neverendingwar - this one for water - currently on the drawing board?

   The lack of rainfall in some areas, creating artificial droughts while other areas are in constant flood conditions, is manipulated by the HAARP program (High- frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in Alaska, U.S.A., and other similar programs scattered around the world. (See Appendix A)

   AIR is last here, but certainly not least. Embedded as a little known facet of the global warming scare is a scheme to not only control but now sell the air via pollution credits. Global warming is a scam perpetrated by scientists who prostitute themselves for financial grants. Those who don't arrive at the pre-determined and politically correct conclusions don't get the grants.

   What are pollution credits? In a nutshell: when a pollution source is eliminated, i.e. crushing vehicles that fail emission tests when owners cannot afford required repairs, or the closing of an industrial plant, or installation of emission controls, air pollution is theoretically reduced. That is the alleged objective of the rigid regulations now being placed upon the lives of people in developed nations throughout the world.

   In fact, it has nothing to do with 'purifying the air'. It has everything to do with more control and the all-mighty dollar. For each case of pollution reduction, credits are created that can be sold to the highest bidder allowing the buyer to legally send tons of pollution into the air, according to how many 'pollution credits' were purchased. It is happening on an international level, as well as within the united States. Did you get that? They are selling the air!

   The Kyoto Treaty on Global Warming actually allows undeveloped nations (like Communist China) to pollute the air, while the developed nations pay the price.

   THAT is what is meant by WORLD DOMINION. Although it is controlled and directed from behind the scenes by an invisible force, the program has obviously enlisted many useful idiots - as the Ruling Sect calls them - to bring the plan to fruition. The plan is being implemented politically at every level of government with barely a whimper of opposition from the people.

"Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery". Protocol No. 4

   This is more a compilation of information than an exercise in writing. As I've poured over books, documents, encyclopedias, newspapers; as I've sorted, transcribed, arranged and rearranged, a fuzzy and confusing picture begins to focus. The information coming into the light is not only deeply disturbing (expressing it mildly), it is critical. It has revealed itself, indisputably, as a political program cloaked in religion.

   The political apparatus enacts Godless and deadly laws; creates bureaucracies; executes wars; appoints or manipulates the election of corrupt judges who mock justice in any form; and in general places despotic leaders at the heads of governments worldwide. The nations' leaders do not lead. They follow directions of 'advisors' who take orders from their masters.

   The religious apparatus - the gemstone of the plan - has ensnared the majority of the world's population in all its multi faceted forms, creating countless belief systems which all, ultimately lead to the same Godless end: the captivity and destruction of souls under WORLD ZIONISM.

   Believing is not knowing. We believe by faith; we know by experience. Religious leaders have tremendous control over their flocks of sheep. Those who train the religious leaders in the various religions have even more control. Those who create the religions have nearly total control.

    If the belief is embedded firmly enough the religious zealot will kill in the name of his god (the Crusades); will make slaves of his fellow man; and will anxiously await the day he and his god rule over all mankind. The Jews believe the Goyim will serve them. Christians believe the Jews will go to hell.     

    The realization of this fact is critical to all people of all races, religions and nations, including those born into Judaism/Talmudism unless they are solidly in the select minority of the Ruling Sect and its major tool -- International Finance.

    Truth be known, there IS no minion of the Masters of Finance who is ever safely or solidly in the select minority, as was evidenced in the great social engineering laboratory of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In fact immediately after the Russian Revolution, the intelligentsia, or literati as they are proud to be called, who helped the Bolsheviks overthrow the Tzarist government, were simply lined up and shot dead.

   Why? Many of them quickly recognized the horror they had helped to create. It was justifiably clear to the usurpers - the Bolshevist Zionist Jews - that those braintrusters could be equally instrumental in the overthrow of the evil regime they had aided and abetted to its success.

   Under Lenin, Stalin and their successors, the power structure shifted like desert sands; those in power were here today, gone tomorrow at the bare whisper of a rumor, a mere accusation of disloyalty. Most often the whisperers were individuals covetous of the positions the accused held.

    It would be safe to say that if the top boss himself stepped out of line, he too would have been eliminated, as were several U.S. Presidents who dared to believe that they were truly presidents and powerful enough to buck the system. Nothing has changed today except the players, who should beware the fact that history does indeed repeat itself. Why would it not, when the same Ruling Sect has been making and writing history throughout the ages?

    The Elders address this specifically in Protocol No. 18:

"Criminals with us will be arrested at the first more or less well-grounded suspicion; it cannot be allowed that out of fear of a possible mistake an opportunity should be given of escape to persons suspected of a political lapse or crime, for in these matters we shall be literally merciless." 

    In case you haven't noticed, this is happening today. It need not continue.

    This essay does not represent a complete overview of the Zionist plan for World Dominion, for its web spans hundreds of centuries in the weaving and its nuances would fill tomes. Secondly, your writer does not have a complete view... yet.

     I see it as analogous to climbing a ladder. When we're at ground level we have a limited view of the surrounding landscape. As we begin to ascend the ladder of awareness our view broadens proportionately until we reach the top rung where the entire scene unfolds. I have no idea to which rung of that ladder I have climbed, nor what is yet beyond my view.

    Maybe the process of awareness is not linear at all. Maybe it is more a process of removing layers of lies, akin to peeling the layers of an onion, until we reach its core.

   Of three facts I am fully cognizant:

    1) Religions were made to control the minds (beliefs and thoughts, thus the behavior) of the masses down through the ages. Nowhere is it written that Jesus claimed his intentions were to start a new religion. Nor have any of the great spiritual teachers made that claim. Religions were made by man. ALL of them.

   2) Commercialism, Materialism, the love of money, is the seductive influence to which the masses of people in all societies in every age have succumbed. Had we not, the Plan would have dissolved into the abiding place from which it was hatched thousands of years ago. Had people 2,000 years ago heeded the words of Jesus; or would the so-called Christians of today heed his words this fact would be realized.

"Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men whom we wanted we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man..." Protocol No 1   

   3) The economic system was created by the same creatures who control the governments of the world today via UN mandates, central banks within the nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary System.

"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."

   So said Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Utilizing their 'power of the purse' (as Theodor Hertzl called it) they also control judges, politicians, education, the media, entertainment -- and they admittedly foment the wars. The unvarnished truth of history proves it, and it has been detailed in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

"Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the Press we have got the GOLD in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people. Protocol No. 2

"And it was said by the prophets that we were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth...

All the wheels of the machinery of all States go by the force of the engine which is in our hands, and that engine of the machinery of States is -- Gold. The science of political economy invented by our learned elders has for long past been giving royal prestige to capital." Protocol No. 5

   I stopped to write this preface when the realization of our awful predicament suddenly became more clear while putting the final touches to the section on the Talmudic and Noahide Laws - the former allegedly applying to Jews, the latter to all non-Jews.

    In fact, as we shall discover, Talmudic Law is being implemented today in the U.S., recognized even into the U.S. Supreme Court, and in all nations which are 'harmonizing' their laws to fit the International scheme. It is the basis of International Law.

    The Noahide Laws, at first glance, innocently appear to be a takeoff on the Ten Commandments. Their defining feature though, is the fact that among the Seven is one which is not a a 'thou shalt not' but one which commands that courts be established to punish those guilty of breaking one of the other Six. The punishment is death and the method of execution is decapitation.

    Jehovah, the giver of both the Talmudic and Noahide Laws is not our Heavenly Father/Creator. Jehovah is the god of ZION; a symbolic Satanic force which drives the plan and its unGodly, evil intentions.

   We shall also discover that the many secret societies have their roots from the same source. In their turn, Freemasons, Templars, Illuminists, Jesuits, Jews, etc. have been blamed for the endless string of calamities which befoul this world, when in fact an Ancient International Priesthood controls all from its secret abiding places - perhaps from the bowels of the earth.

   Members in the lower orders of the secret societies have a specific role to play, according to Albert Pike:

"The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple.

Part of the symbols are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them, but it is intended that he shall IMAGINE he understand them.

Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry.

. . . The symbols of the wise are the Idols of the vulgar, or else as meaningless as the hieroglyphics of Egypt to the nomadic Arabs. There must always be a common-place interpretation for the mass of Initiates, of the symbols that are eloquent to the Adepts.

... The Templars were unintelligent and therefore unsuccessful Jesuits."  p. 819 - Morals and Dogma

   This next statement is attributed to Manly P Hall. Although we were unable to confirm Hall as its source, the utterance is worthy of quoting:

"Masonry does not represent the path to truth, it is a path of finding always darkness deeper than before."

   The Protocols address what they call 'show' masonry, for the Goy cattle, who will help the planners by betraying their fellow man in exchange for prestige and power. In the end, when they have been used up, they too will be eliminated.

It is this which has served as the basis for our organization of secret masonry which is not known to, and aims which are not even so much as suspected by, these Goy cattle, attracted by us into the show army of Masonic Lodges in order to throw dust in the eyes of their fellows. Protocol No. 11

   How does this relate to the Persecution of the Jews? We shall discover that Jewish Persecution has always been orchestrated -- though not necessarily implemented -- by the Priesthood and its minions; that Jewish Persecution has played a critical role in the successful implementation, to this point, of the plan for World Dominion; and that the sufferers of Jewish Persecution, the 'lesser brethren', are born and bred to suffer.

"Nowadays if any States raise a protest against us it is only pro forma at our discretion and by our direction, for their anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren."   Protocol No. 9 (emphasis added)

    Because of the orchestrated and often false claims of Jewish Persecution and anti-Semitism, hatecrime laws have been passed in many countries which forbid the mere discussion of the Jewish Question. At the mere mention of the 'J' word, cries of anti-Semitism ring out so those who would reveal the truth of the evils of Zionism are castigated and/or imprisoned.

   Without Jewish Persecution in this final phase of the last 3,000 years the plan could not have succeeded to its present point because, according to their own words: without hatred, divisiveness, racial discontent and all which that implies, there would surely be TRUE PEACE AMONG MEN AND AMONG THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD. In our heart of hearts we all know that:

WAR IS NOT PEACE

FREEDOM IS NOT SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS NOT INTELLIGENCE

   The Jews have hotly denied the Protocols, claiming they are a forgery. So do Christians who haven't read and researched the issue. I was recently asked by a Judeo-Christian friend: "Why are you still quoting from this piece of fraudulent trash?"

   The following comments from Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent of July 1920 put them in the same perspective as Mr. Reed who we quoted at the beginning:

"When you see how closely the Jews are united by various organizations in the United States, and when you see how with practiced hand they bring those organizations to bear as if with tried confidence in their pressure, it is at least not inconceivable that what can be done within a country -- can be done, or has been done between all the countries where the Jews live.

At any rate, in the American Hebrew of June 25, 1920, Herman Bernstein writes thus:

"About a year ago a representative of the Department of Justice submitted to me a copy of the manuscript of 'The Jewish Peril' by Professor Nilus, and asked for my opinion of the work. He said that the manuscript was a translation of a Russian book published in 1905 which was later suppressed.

The manuscript was supposed to contain 'protocols' of the Wise Men of Zion and was supposed to have been read by Dr. Herzl at a secret conference of the Zionist Congress at Basle.

He expressed the opinion that the work was probably that of Dr. Theodor Herzl... He said that some American Senators who had seen the manuscript were amazed to find that so many years ago a scheme had been elaborated by the Jews which is now being carried out, and that Bolshevism had been planned years ago by Jews who sought to destroy the world".

This quotation is made merely to put on record the fact that it was a representative of the Department of Justice of the United States Government, who introduced this document to Mr. Bernstein, and expressed a certain opinion upon it, namely, "that the work was probably that of Dr. Theodor Herzl". Also that 'some American Senators' were amazed to note the comparison between what a publication of the year 1905 proposed and what the year 1920 revealed.

The incident is all the more preoccupying because it occurred by action of the representative of a government who today is very largely in the hands of, or under the influence of, Jewish interests. It is more than probable that as soon as the activity became known, the investigation was stopped.

A copy of the Protocols was deposited in the British Museum and bears on it the stamp of that institution, 'August 10, 1906'.

The document was published in England recently under auspices that challenged attention for it, in spite of the unfortunate title under which it appeared. Eyre and Spotiswoode are the appointed printers to the British Government, and it was they who brought out the pamphlet. It was as if the Government Printing Office at Washington should issue them in this country. While there was the usual outcry by the Jewish press, the London Times in a review pronounced all the Jewish counter-attacks as 'unsatisfactory'. ...

The interest of the Protocols at this time is their bearing on the questions: Have the Jews an organized world system? What is its policy? How is it being worked?

The Protocols are a World Program -- there is no doubt anywhere of that. Whose program, is stated within the articles themselves. But as for outer confirmation, which would be the more valuable -- a signature, or six signatures, or twenty signatures, or a 25-year unbroken line of effort fulfilling that program?

The point of interest for this and other countries is not that a 'criminal or a madman' conceived such a program, but that, when conceived, this program found means of getting itself fulfilled in its most important particulars. The document is comparatively unimportant; the conditions to which it calls attention are of a very high degree of importance.' --- Dearborn Independent - Issue of July 10, 1920.

   The reader will be better able to form an opinion of the efficacy of the Protocols as they appear hereunder, interspersed with the relating of history as it occurred.

   This work is offered with deep and abiding love for our Heavenly Father/ Creator, in Which we live and breath and have our being; for our fellow man; and with a burning desire for truth and understanding. It is offered with my prayer that we will all be freed of the illusion into which we were born and that we will remain free to seek the truth, which as Jesus promised, will make us free. I believe that IS the single thread we seek.

JEWISH PERSECUTION

TOOL of the International Zionists' Plan for World Dominion

PART ONE

 

In Deuteronomy 18:18, 20, Moses claimed that Jehovah said:

"I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.

But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die."

And they told us Jesus died. Except He taught that in fact there is no death, for what God (First Cause) creates is eternal.

In Chapter 10 of the English Translation, Maimonides' Mishna Torah curses Jesus Christ:

"It is a mitzvah [religious duty], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors... and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. MAY THE NAME OF THE WICKED ROT". (p. 184) [emphasis added]

We will return to Maimonides later.

Before we address the question of Jewish Persecution it seems necessary to lay a foundation upon which the subject matter will firmly rest. The basis will be established with fore and background commentary, quotes from various authors (Christian and Jew alike) and the Bible (both Old and New Testaments). Questions that are relevant to this entire subject will be raised.

Most of the books from which I quote are listed in the Resources section of the sweetliberty.org website along with information on where they may be acquired.

For the reader's clarity: All quotes from other authors are indented; authors are credited if known. All left-justified lines and paragraphs are my comments.

For further clarity, we will be examining the Law of the Talmudists (speaking on behalf of Jehovah/ Yahaveh) as differentiated from the LAW of Creator/God, which is immutable, which Is perfect Love and Justice. This is the LAW under which we live whether we are aware or oblivious, and whether we accept or reject Its existence.

We read of that in Galatians 6:7, and it can be found as an unbroken thread through most of the ancient spiritual teachings:

"Be not deceived; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."

Note that we said, spiritual, not 'religious' teachings. What could possibly be more loving, more just than that we are allowed to reap what we sow?  For me, the beauty of it is that no religious tenet or doctrine, nor any man-made law can change, diminish, alter, or reverse God's LAW.

The principle in effect is that all people, of all religions and creeds and races exist under this law. That includes Christians, Jews, Muslims and all who embrace any form of those religions; and it includes all who embrace no religious belief system, as well as those who do or do not accept a concept of a Creator, First Cause, Intelligent Thought, God... what we call it matters not, nor changes what IS.   

If the realization of this truth - the Law of Cause and Effect, we reap what we sow, what goes around comes around - is frightening, it is because we would rather not be called to account for our mis-deeds. We would rather that Jesus had died because of our mis-deeds, and from that time forward all we have to do whenever we sow bad seeds is to say 'I'm sorry'.  That's all.  Just, 'I'm sorry'... until the next time. And the next. And the next.  

That is Christian mythology. Christianity teaches its adherents that whatever they do that is not loving or good is nullified by the death and blood of Jesus, so they can go on their merry way, 'sinning up a storm'. Jews are taught that non-Jews are in fact not human beings, so anything they do that is not loving or good - other than against a brother Jew - is no sin at all. We will examine both these tenets in more depth later.    

The opening quote from the Old Testament was presented as food for thought for those of you who may be inclined to consider this writing 'blasphemous', and therefore to set it aside before you've given yourself the benefit of seeing and contemplating a more comprehensive view of the overall picture. Jesus did, after all, tell us to ask, seek and knock.

As for discovering truth, Jesus was specific: "Seek ye the truth...". Seek means exactly that: SEEK.

Jesus knew the truth; Jesus spoke the truth; and the Pharisees / Levitical Priests sought Jesus' death. The question we must ask is: to which 'god, among the gods' do the priests of old refer when they speak of Jehovah? Jesus said the Pharisees are of their father, the Devil.

Lest you believe the truth will be given you by a Christian church or religious leader, it would help to understand that the 'goal' of the churches is no longer that of guiding their parishioners to spiritual consciousness.  Instead, they promulgate the wholly material, political program for World Dominion and the moral decadence which precedes a great fall of once-great civilizations.

In essence, the Christian church today has become a pseudo-synagogue. It is preaching the 'religion' of the Jews. That, too, will become clear as historical and current events are unfolded.

I refer you to Time Magazine's March 1942 article titled American Malvern. It describes a meeting of 375 appointed representatives of 30-odd Christian denominations, called together by the Federal Council of Churches. This gathering took place just three months after the U.S. entered World War II, and was chaired by John Foster Dulles.

Excerpting Time Magazine, 3-16-1942 (emphasis added):

"These are the high spots of organized U.S. Protestantism's super-protestant new program for a just and durable peace after World War II:

* Ultimately, 'a world government of delegated powers'.  

* Complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism.  

* Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty.  

* International control of all armies and navies.

* A universal system of money... so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation

* worldwide freedom of immigration.

* Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade.

* A 'democratically controlled' international bank. . .

Every local Protestant church in the country will now be urged to get behind the program.

'As Christian citizens,' its sponsors affirmed, 'we must seek to translate our beliefs into practical realities and to create a public opinion which will insure that the United States shall play it's full and essential part in the creation of a moral way of international living'.

These principles. . . bade the U.S. give thought to the short-sighted selfishness of its own policies after World War I . . . declared that the U.S. would have to turn over a new leaf if the world is to enjoy lasting peace."

". . . if the world is to enjoy lasting peace".  Peace, according to V. I. Lenin was defined as: absence of any resistance whatsoever -- total elimination of resistance -- to the plan for World Dominion. Keep that fact in the top front files of your memory banks so you may not be deceived.

When they use the word 'peace' imagine a world of mindless, thoughtless slaves following their masters' every command without question, and without compassion for another living being whether animal or human; for that is what they mean and how they intend it to be.

The creatures playing god on earth must force their will, which is alien to our real Self, which Is love; and only love is real. Creator/God is Love.

That statement should not be transposed in our minds to mean that: love is God. Love is of God. We are of God. All that exists, all that is real is of God. God is Light. Darkness is not the opposite of light, it is merely the absence of light, for what is real has no opposite. Lucifer is the Lord of Darkness... the Lord of nothing. No thing.

Knowing that, it follows that we 'know' in the sane part of our minds, the vast difference between that which is loving, good, of God (Jesus said only God is good) and that which is not.  We know.  The plan for World Dominion - the evil loose upon this earth - is not good, is not loving, therefore, is not the plan of Creator/God.

The question here is: who would rule the world in a 'world government of delegated powers'? Surely not Jesus, unless we can convince ourselves he was just kidding the Pharisees when he said,

'My Kingdom is not of this world'.

Let's review the 'high spots of organized U.S. Protestantism's super-protestant new program for a just and durable peace after World War II' to see which of those political goals - that became church goals - have been implemented in the U.S. To a degree, each of them is now in place, some needing just a tweak here or there. We'll cover each briefly:

* A world government of delegated powers - The UN Chronicle, March 1993 - 47th General Assembly. Page 29 states that:

"The General Assembly is facing an historic challenge to truly become a functional world parliament on the basis of the United Nations Charter."

A world parliamentary government of delegated powers. Administrators. Non-elected bureaucrats directing and controlling our lives. A Thesaurus synonym for 'administrate' is: 'dictate'.

WWII was allegedly fought to save the world from the 'evil Axis' - the dictatorships - only to have set in place a centuries-old, planned world dictatorship, using the United Nations Organization as its fundamental tool.

Col. Edward Mandell House - Woodrow Wilson's 'alter-ego' and close advisor - wrote a book in 1912 titled, Philip Dru: Administrator. In the story, Administrator Dru became a world dictator. House was a liaison between the globalists and Woodrow Wilson, which explains Wilson's international leanings.

* Complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism - The U.S. is entangled in hundreds of international treaties which forces our involvement around the globe. Treaties are allegedly ruled and regulated under international laws. The U.S. has been the world globo-cop since it joined the UN in 1945.

It started in Korea, and has never stopped. War after war after war... nearly 300 of them, called police actions, or conflicts, or peacekeeping missions. Never called what it really is: WAR. The horror is all the killing and dying in the name of peace, and the fact that Americans fight and kill and die in the U.S./UN instigated wars. 

* Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty - Our national sovereignty has been compromised by adherence to UN mandates at all levels of government, and elimination of national borders via regional governance, i.e:

Border Region 21-Implemented as part of the UN's Agenda 21: This regional arrangement politically erases the southern borders of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California; a sixty-mile strip on both sides of the international border between Mexico and U.S. In essence, Border Region 21 is a one-hundred-twenty- mile-wide strip of no-mans land, stretching from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean. The region is jointly administered by U.S. and Mexican appointed bureaucrats under UN auspices. State legislators could undo the deed.

Cascadia - called by its creators 'the two nation vacation', politically erases U.S. Canadian borders encompassing five northwestern states (Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Alaska) and two Canadian provinces (Alberta and British Columbia). Cascadia reports its own GNP and has its own 'regional director'. State legislators could undo this one too.

It was recently announced in a news broadcast that the border-patrol on the Canada-U.S. border has been 'integrated'.

* International control of all armies and navies - In the U.S., the plan was first revealed in State Department Publication 7277 in 1961; implemented by U.S. PL 87-297 in 1963 as the Arms Control and Disarmament Act.

The 'law' provides for the reduction of U.S. military forces to 1.2 million, the majority of which are to be transferred permanently to, and for the unquestioned use of, the UN's 'peace' keeping missions. A portion will be assigned to the U.S. to 'maintain internal peace'. It is imperative you have firmly fixed in your mind their definition of 'peace'.

Several years ago Congressman Ray LaHood , from Illinois, declared that our military was 1.3 million strong, down from the previous nearly 3 million. We have no current statistics to quote here.

Equally malevolent in that same 'law', is the destruction and elimination of "all weapons, including weapons of mass destruction", other than those necessary for law enforcement. Our reader must know that personal self-defense weapons are included in that 'elimination of weapons' scheme, although the addition of the words, 'including weapons of mass destruction', takes one's attention off the obvious. All weapons means all weapons.

Soon after 9-11, for the first time in our history, American skies were being monitored by aircraft from a foreign entity. NATO's AWACS - Advanced Warning Aircraft Carriers - were monitoring our airspace because our nation's defense forces were otherwise occupied in, or slated for, the neverendingwar beginning in Afghanistan.

The 'New NATO' provides for intervention in the internal affairs of nations, because - according to the May-June 1999 issue of Foreign Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations' flagship publication - it has been decided that conflicts within a nations' borders are as disruptive to world peace as are conflicts between nations.

It is reported that other countries are following the same procedure; the Russian military is allegedly at the 1.2 million mark; and ominously, as far as we know Communist China continues to build a formidable military force.  

* A universal system of money... so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation When 'money' becomes electronic impulses in a world computer, used worldwide, there will be no inflation or deflation. Our personal accounts will be credited with just enough to sustain life. Commodity prices will be controlled to eliminate competition and monitor our purchases.

Food is energy. Our energy input will be measured against our energy output (labor). In their system of Capital, all mankind is considered Human Capital. Capital comes from the word 'chattel' or 'cattle'. When input exceeds output, we are targeted as 'useless eaters'; as human capital we are then 'depreciated'. This is the real definition of Total Quality Management, via the New Order of Barbarians.

* Worldwide freedom of immigration - In the U.S., immigrants of color are welcomed with open arms whether legal or illegal. Caucasians find it difficult to obtain anything other than short-term visas that require frequent renewal. All nations of predominantly Caucasian people have become melting pots of multi-culturalism, while the nations from where the immigrants originated, for the most part, retain their racial heritage.

Seeing the end result of this policy does not require a magnifying glass. As a dabbler in oil painting, there is no question that when any other color is mixed with white, white is no longer white. Miscegenation - the interbreeding of races - is an important (to them) part of the plan, and it's obvious the white race is slated for extinction.

As important to them as it is, my objection is not grounded from a standpoint of 'white supremacy'. It couldn't be even if I wanted, for somewhere in our family bloodline, in addition to its German, French, Irish, Scotch, Dutch and English predominance, there is American Indian ancestry. I like that and have often felt more affinity with that ancestry than all the 'white' in my veins.

My objection is simply the fact that it has been so heavily promoted, manipulated, encouraged, even pushed by the world troublemakers. In America today, it would not be surprising to discover that the numbers of 'minorities', as a whole, are now overwhelming the numbers of whites. And we may be amazed to learn the actual numbers of whites in the world today, as compared to fifty years ago.

Given that we are spiritual beings inhabiting physical bodies, and in those levels beyond this third-dimensional, material world, there is no color or religion or race, the reasoning behind the planned extinction of the white race has eluded my understanding. Having been filled in sufficiently on the scriptural-based theory, although it makes sense from a purely material standpoint, that's as far as it goes.

I consider the possibility that, since the planners of the present and planned future evil are godless, in that, for them only the material world is real, maybe this racial manipulation is to keep our minds focused in the material in an attempt to ground us, so to speak; to ground us in the material rather than the spiritual, which surely retards our spiritual consciousness.

Since I have utilized this space to 'think aloud' to you, patient reader, and since I leave the subject as thoroughly unresolved as when we approached it, I can only thank you for your indulgence; we will continue with our review of the church goals laid out in 1943.    

* Democratically controlled International Bank - World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements, controlling all central banks in all countries - in the U.S. it is the Federal Reserve Bank. Who controls a nation's monetary system, controls that government. Who controls the world's monetary system -- controls the world.

* Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade - North American Free Trade Agreement - NAFTA; General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade - GATT; World Trade Organization - WTO.

NATO is in essence part of the trade-expansion process. The NATO Charter declares that it is a military and economic entity. Article II of the North Atlantic Treaty states:

"The Parties will. . . seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any or all of them."

In a Philadelphia Inquirer article of 3-10-96, the headline tells the story:

Thatcher urges expansion of NATO, allied trade pact.

"AP - FULTON, Mo. -- Seeing a world of instability and conflict much like Winston Churchill did 50 years ago, Margaret Thatcher yesterday urged that NATO be refocused militarily and expanded, and that allies on both sides of the Atlantic form a political and trade partnership."

Have you noticed that amidst all the rhetoric about global instability and conflict, international economic and social upheavals, etc., that no mention is ever made of the fact that this chaos was in fact the primary justification for the creation of the United Nations over fifty years ago? They hope we'll forget.

Compelling evidence has shown that the plan for World Dominion is in fact a political program, enforced by war and wrapped in the cloak of religion... all for the alleged purpose of 'world peace'. That the program is in fact being wholeheartedly supported and promoted by most all Christian churches - each in their own way, either openly or by silent consent - is undeniable. If some of our readers need more convincing as to 'whose' plan it is, read on.

In a radio address by then U.S. Secretary of State, Cordell Hull, on May 18, 1941, the American people were informed of - and most didn't notice - many of the same goals later adopted by the churchmen: Hull's speech is excerpted below from Voices of History: (emphasis added)

"Tonight we inaugurate another annual National Foreign-Trade Week . . . now there is little use in our talking about and planning for foreign trade unless the outcome of this war is favorable to the free peoples of the world. For free trade means free bargaining to mutual advantage . . .

To get a more complete picture of what [the dangers] involve, it is necessary to envisage the kind of an economic world that would exist if the would be conquerors were to win...

Under it, trade is reduced essentially to... barter."

Hull's reference to 'barter' alludes to the dreaded economic program of Germany, implemented by Adolph Hitler which we will discuss in some detail later. Cordell Hull went on to say:

"After the first World War an attempt was made to reorganize the world on a sound basis. New institutions were created [League of Nations]

and new methods of cooperation were established [International Law].

All peoples shared the hope that a new era in international relations had begun [New World Order].

Unhappily, shortly after the close of the World War, power fell into the hands of groups which advocated political and economic nationalism in their most extreme forms... [most likely referring to Italy, Japan and Germany, the three major powers opposing Bolshevism in Europe - for all Europeans]

Knowing these facts as we do, it is none too early to lay down at least some of the principles by which policies must be guided at the conclusion of the war, to press for a broad program of world economic reconstruction and to consider tentative plans for the application of those policies. The main principles, as proven by experience, are few and simple:

1. Extreme nationalism must not again be permitted to express itself in excessive trade restrictions.

2. Nondiscrimination in international commercial relations must be the rule, so that international trade may grow and prosper.

3. Raw-material supplies must be available to all nations without discrimination.

4. International agreements regarding the supply of commodities must be handled as to protect fully the interests of the consuming countries and their people.

5. The institutions and arrangements of international finance must be so set up that they lend aid to the essential enterprises and the continuous development of all countries, and permit payment through processes of trade consonant with the welfare of all countries.

Measures taken to give effect to these principles must be freely open to every nation which desires a peaceful life in a world at peace and is willing to cooperate in maintaining that peace."

That would mean their version of peace of course: total and complete absence of resistance to the plan for World Dominion.

Hull's statement in that last paragraph is loaded. Any nation that refuses to comply with their world economic and trade policies will be caught up in wars, having their natural leaders removed in favor of puppet leaders along with new government structures: like the Bosnian Accord in 1995 of which Richard Holbrooke, then Assistant Secretary of State ordered, "it will be signed, or else!".

What the 'or else' meant was never disclosed to the public. They wrote a new constitution for the people in Bosnia, nearly identical to the Soviet constitution, which is very much like the UN Charter. But then, why would they not concur? The minions of the same group wrote them all.

That the people in Bosnia didn't agree to the agreement meant nothing to the 'nation builders' representing the U.S. Incidentally, the Jew, Holbrooke was a proud protege' of the Jew, Henry Kissinger. Continuing with Cordell Hull: 

"There still are people who do not see that if, when the present conflict ends, we do not have a system of open trade, they will not be able either to buy or to sell except on terms really laid down by the military forces and political authorities of the countries with which they have to deal.

Unless a system of open trade becomes firmly established, there will be chronic political instability and recurrent economic collapse. There will never be peace in any real sense of the term."

Peace only exists for them in their sense of the term.

"In the final reckoning, the problem becomes one of establishing the foundations of an international order in which independent nations cooperate freely with each other for their mutual gain -- of a world order, not new but renewed, which liberates rather than enslaves.

We shall not be able to do this until we have a world free from imminent military danger and clear of malign political intrigue.

This nation is resolved to evade no issues and to face harsh facts. We believe that there can be created a safer and more prosperous world. We have the tools -- the resources, the brains, the hands -- with which to make it such.

But first the tide of force must be turned back. Once that is done, we and other nations can reestablish an open, cooperative, economic life in which trade may increase, economic welfare may grow, civilization may advance, and the peaceful and benevolent instincts of masses of now prostrate people may once more flourish in the really worthwhile ways of life."  

All of that was said sixty-two years ago. The Allies won the war. Germany was crushed along with the threat to the International Economic Order, which has since tightened its stranglehold on the people of the world.

Twenty million German men, women and children died by starvation and murder after the allied victory 'peace' was made. The surviving German people have paid over $100 billion dollars in 'reparations' to Jews in Israel. They are still paying. It seems the reparation agreement signed on behalf of the German people was an open-ended deal to yoke them into perpetuity in a dual state of guilt to the world and servitude to Israel.

'Open and free trade' exists under the NAFTA and GATT/ WTO. . . ah, yes, the people of the world are certainly 'flourishing' aren't they? Tens of millions of jobs have been lost to Americans, while factories continue to close up shop in the U.S. and head to foreign shores. 'China-made' products abound. We must search diligently for made-in-the-U.S.A; and today, many of those U.S. products come from laborers - a vast portion of whom are not criminals in the real sense of the word - in the privatized prison systems.

Is the world free of 'malign political intrigue' today? Obviously not; and sadly, the 'imminent military danger' of which Hull spoke is now the United States and its very expensive stepchild, Israel. Or do we have that backwards? Has the creature become the real seat of power?

The gist of the message behind the political rhetoric in Mr. Hull's speech on the importance of open and free trade in a peaceful world is explained in Protocol No. 5.

"Capital, if it is to cooperate untrammeled, must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade: this is already being put in execution by an unseen hand in all quarters of the world.

This freedom will give political force to those engaged in industry, and that will help to oppress the people." 

Open and free trade ". . . will give political force to those engaged in industry. That will help to oppress the people" in our peaceful world.

Having a look at the goals expected to be achieved by that Second World War, it begins to make sense why FDR kept secret the foreknowledge of the pending attack on Pearl Harbor; the plan rested wholly on their ability to beguile the American people into a spirit of war - again. In fact, there was more than foreknowledge at work; it was fore planning, as has become evident in the so-called terrorist attack on the World Trade Center being used to justify the current 'final conflict'.

Wars in other nations have become so common place today the planners knew it would take an act of 'terrorism' within our nation's borders to execute an all-out war with the blessings of brain-numbed Americans. With the passing of time Americans' passion for this New War has waned. To remedy that vexing situation, George W. enlisted the professional aid of powerful ad agencies for the needed hype.

On a recent (May 2002) panel discussion aired on C-Span, the panelists were lamenting the fact that Americans - other than New Yorkers - have already compartmentalized the World Trade Center tragedy and have resumed their normal daily routines. Panelist, William Kristol, was quoted as saying that in six months the war will be the foremost thought in all Americans' minds. In six months. What gruesome assault is on the planning boards now? We shall see if Mr. Kristol is another modern day prophet.

This next was from our past, over eighty five years ago, and yet, it could have been William Kristol speaking today; or by its open and at least honest hostility, one of the Elders of Zion:

"The task before us will be completed through the use of the military spirit in the citizenry.

The principle of wearing uniforms will enable us to complete the negative missions: only when every member of our cultural circle are in uniform and ready to fight can we regard this task as completed".

The author of that statement was Nahum Goldman, an ardent Zionist, written in his war pamphlet - 'The Spirit of Militarism' - in 1915, published in the Reich in the midst of World War I. [from End Times End Games by Hans Schmidt]

Douglas Reed maintained that WWII was merely an 'Extension' of the World Revolution. We excerpt here from this chapter of his book, Controversy of Zion, confirming the fore-planning involved:

"Thus the story of America's embroilment in the Second War demonstrated the power of the 'foreign group' which had come to dictate in Washington, and gave living reality to the farewell address of George Washington himself:

"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens, the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government".

Washington spoke in 1796, when the Reign of Terror had shown the true nature of the revolution in France and when the presence of the conspiracy's agents in America was first realized.

The published records of the Second War show that the conspiracy had obtained power to dictate major acts of American state policy, the course of military operations and the movement of arms, munitions, supplies and treasure. Its conscious agents were numerous and highly-placed.

A significant resemblance occurs between the manner of America's entry into war in 1898 and 1941. In both cases the provocation necessary to inflame the masses was supplied, and difficult problems of convincing Congress or 'public opinion' were thus eluded.

In 1898 the Maine was 'sunk by a Spanish mine' in Havana harbour, and war followed on the instant; many years later, when the Maine was raised, her plates were found to have been blown out by an inner explosion.

In 1941 the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour 'on a day that will live in infamy' enabled President Roosevelt to sell his country that through a completely unexpected attack it was 'at war'. The later disclosures showed that the government in Washington had long been warned of the impending attack and had not alerted the Pearl Harbour defenders.

In both cases the public masses remained apathetic when these revelations ensued. (They are of continuing relevance in 1956, when another American president [Eisenhower] has publicly sworn that he will 'never be guilty' of sending his country to war 'without Congressional authority', but has added that American troops might have to undertake 'local warlike acts in self-defence', without such parliamentary approval.)

In the First War President Wilson, re-elected on the promise to keep his country out of war, immediately after his re-inauguration declared that 'a state of war exists'.

In the Second War President Roosevelt was re-elected in 1940 on the repeated promise that 'your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars'. His electoral programme, however, included a five-word proviso: 'We will not send our armies, navies or air forces to fight in foreign lands outside the Americas except in case of attack'.

The importance of the proviso was shown on December 7, 1941, when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour. Twelve days earlier, Mr. Henry L. Stimson, the Secretary for War, after a cabinet meeting on November 25, 1941, had noted in his diary,

"The question was how we should manoeuvre them (the Japanese) into the position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves; it was a difficult proposition".

The record now available suggests that the Americans on Hawaii alone were left without knowledge of the imminent onslaught which cost two battleships and two destroyers (apart from many vessels put out of action), 177 aircraft and 4,575 dead, wounded or missing. 

A direct and immediate consequence was also the disaster suffered by the British navy off Malaya, when the battleships Prince of Wales and Renown were sunk with great loss of life.

Political leaders who are ready to obtain their country's entry into war by facilitating an enemy attack on it cannot be depended on to wage it in the national interest.

The American people as a whole still is unaware of the truth of Pearl Harbour, an ominous beginning which led in unbroken line to the ominous end."

The beginning of the end is now. Today! It is the neverendingwar in which the U.S. is engaging the world, along side the push into Palestine by Israel.

Mr. Reed did not mention the machinations behind our entry into WWI which should be included here in order to give credence to the assertion that every war in which American soldiers have been used, has been a plan to further the goals of the World Revolution.

When Europe became embroiled in the first 'great war', it has been written that nine of every ten Americans opposed U.S. intervention. They would not be aroused by all the propaganda of the controlled press and passionate speeches of Zionist lackeys in the government. Neither could the U.S. Congress be persuaded. For this reason, a hostile act had to be committed by the enemy -- namely Germany.

Without going into all the truly ugly details, of which books have been written, suffice it to say that: Woodrow Wilson, Mandel House, J .P. Morgan (a Rothschild agent) and Winston Churchill (First Lord of the Admiralty at the time) conspired together to ensure that the passenger ship, Lusitania -- carrying 1,195  passengers, 195 of which were Americans -- would be sunk by a German U-boat.

Part of the British Cunard line, the Lusitania had been restructured, armored and armed for combat. Along with her unsuspecting passengers, she was known to be carrying tons of ammunition and other war materials from the U.S. to England in violation of the protocols of war by 'neutral' powers.

We use the phrase 'neutral powers' facetiously in this case, because the real history of WWI proves that not only was the war discussed as far back as 1906, it was decided that the U.S. would be brought in on the side of the Allies. However, it is probable that the method whereby the U.S. would be entangled was not formulated until later.

In the case of the Lusitania, the German government had pre-paid for adds to be placed in fifty newspapers, mostly on the east coast, warning Americans not to sail on the Lusitania. Of all the papers, only the Des Moines Register published the warning on the requested date. The U.S. State Department frightened publishers by raising the possibility of liable suites if they published without prior clearance from State Department attorneys.

Following is a transcript of the text of that ad from G. Edward Griffin's book, The Creature From Jekyll Island:

NOTICE!

TRAVELERS intending to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that, in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travelers sailing in the war zone on the ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at their own risk.  

IMPERIAL GERMAN EMBASSY  Washington, D.C. April 22, 1915

Mr. Griffin also explains how the German navy had been goaded into a position of 'shoot first, ask questions later'. On May, 7th, 1915 the Lusitania set sail without protection; her course was charted for a known German submarine nest. As expected, the hit from a single German torpedo caused an explosion so great (from the explosives on board ship) that the Lusitania went down in only 18 minutes, carrying nearly a thousand men, women, children and infants to their death.

Later, at the American Embassy, because he was under the impression that all passengers had survived, Ambassador Page went ahead with a planned dinner, during which the telegrams began arriving detailing the events of the tragedy. Mr. Page read each of them aloud to his guests. It is said that when the full details of the tragedy were known, Mandel House informed all present that the U.S. would enter the war within the month.

Even after the deaths of nearly 100 American citizens, it took almost two years for the press, along with constant pressure from President Wilson, to arouse the people and finally persuade the U.S. Congress to declare war against Germany. Obviously, Americans then were not quite so easily inspired to war as they are today. However, on April 16, 1917 Americans were pressed into war, believing they were fighting for God and country.

To accomplish this feat over a thousand innocent lives were lost, military career men left their offices, William Jennings Bryan resigned as Secretary of State, the Lusitania's Captain Turner became a scapegoat, and in defense of the World Order U.S. soldiers left their families, wives, and children to kill and die. Just as they are doing today.

The influence of the press at that time was a result of the Morgan-Rockefeller scheme in buying up the major newspapers, in order to 'press' them into the service of the Internationalists.

In Griffin's book mentioned above, Griffin explained that:

"When the ship was sunk off the coast of Ireland with 195 Americans aboard, it became the center of a national campaign to generate emotional support for coming into the war."

On page 262 of The Creature From Jekyll Island there is a reproduction of one of the campaign ads designed most effectively to reach into the very depths of one's heart. A painting depicts a young woman at the bottom of the ocean, holding an infant tightly in her arms, her hair and gossamer gown drifting in the current. The painting says it all. The single commanding word, in large, bold letters says simply: ENLIST

Those same unconscionable methods are being used today, to sustain the hurt, anger and desire for revenge of the WTC tragedy, in the minds and hearts of Americans. HBO is just now airing a memorial to the victims of the heinous act of evil, renewing, refreshing, and re-energizing the gamut of emotions that had begun to heal.

We are dealing here with cold, calculating devils who have either lost, or they've never had so much as a glimmer, of either compassion for another human being or remorse for their deeds. If it should happen that any of them would suddenly awaken to the terror they've caused and committed, they would surely lose their minds with relentless grief.

The United States' entry into the Great War filled the needs of both the British and the Zionists. England needed U.S. military power - including American men and boys - and the Zionists wanted the 'Holy Land' for themselves. It is for themselves and their ruthless plan for World Dominion, not for their lesser brethren. In exchange for the Zionists' promise to bring the U.S. into the war, the British government promised a 'homeland' in Palestine for the Jews.

This promise was made via a letter from Arthur James Balfour to Lord Rothschild on November 2, 1917, that became known as the Balfour Declaration (appendix B). Incidentally, the Declaration did not promise a Jewish State for the Jews; it promised a homeland, along with certain and specific conditions, to wit:

". . . it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".

The snag accompanying the promise was the fact that Palestine was not England's to give; at that time Turkey ruled Palestine under a sort of home rule government. For nearly twenty years the Zionists had been wrangling for a homeland for the Jews, and they turned down offers made for other territory. It had to be Palestine!

According to Doug Reed:

"As the first decade of the 20th Century grew older the signs of the coming storms multiplied. In 1903 the British Government had offered Uganda to Zionism and Max Nordau had publicly foretold 'the future world war', in the sequence to which England would procure Palestine for Zionism. In 1905 the Protocols prophetically revealed the destructive orgy of Communism.

Then in 1906 one Mr. Arthur James Balfour, Prime Minister of England, met Dr. Weizmann in a hotel room and was captivated by the notion of presenting Palestine, which was not his to give to 'the Jews". Rabbi Elmer Berger says of that time,

"that group of Jews which committed itself to Zionism . . . entered a peripatetic kind of diplomacy which took it into many chancelleries and parliaments, exploring the labyrinth and devious ways of international politics in a part of the world where political intrigue and secret deals were a byword. Jews began to play the game of 'practical politics'."

It was arranged well ahead of the planned first Great War, that England would declare Turkey its enemy, gain control of Palestine, and hand it over to the Jews. It happened as planned. During the war British leaders beholden to Zionist powers diverted men, weapons and planes from France to Palestine just prior to the German invasion of France, endangering the lives of hundreds of thousands of soldiers, and the possible outcome of the war. . . except they knew the U.S. would come to their rescue.

Why did the Zionists specifically want Palestine?

First, it served to fulfill the mandates of Jehovah that his 'chosen' would be given this territory as their reward for obeying all his bloody statutes. In their arguments to get what they wanted, Zionist leaders claimed that, "the Bible is our mandate". In fact, for the Jews, their mandate is the Torah and the Talmud, not the Bible.

Secondly, the land in that area contains rich natural resources beyond comprehension. According to George W. Armstrong, in his book, The Zionists:

"The value of the minerals of the Dead Sea is estimated at five trillion dollars. This estimate appears to be optimistic but it is supported in part by the report of the Crown Agents of the British Colonies entitled "Production of Minerals From the Waters of the Dead Sea" (page 2).

It is alleged that all copies of this booklet containing this report have been destroyed except those in the British Museum, Colonial Office, and House of Commons.

This official report estimates the minerals, except oil, in 1925 as follows: Magnesium Chloride, 22,000 tons, value 600 billion dollars; Potassium Chloride, 20,000 tons, value 75 billion dollars; other minerals valued at 1,200 billion dollars; or a total of about three trillion dollars, exclusive of oil.

This enormous value staggers the imagination. I am unable to appraise the effect on the human race if the Zionists gain undisputed title to it, or if it should be devoted to public use. "

Mr. Armstrong did not mention the mineral and oil wealth of the Negev area, which was also included in the partitioning process. The Rothschilds were well aware of these facts. The land stolen from the Arab Palestinians by the Zionists is considered veritably the Jewel Box of the world. (Appendix C ).

It boggles the mind to realize the wealth controlled by virtue of those natural resources alone, and to be aware of the fact that Americans have supported Israel to the tune of $10 billion a year, plus, since its very inception. Then there's the over-$100 billion Germans have paid in reparations, plus all the hundreds of millions of dollars bilked out of the lesser brethren for the cause.

To confirm the early pre-planning of that first world war, Norman Dodd, Executive Director of the Reese Congressional Committee that was formed in 1953 to investigate tax exempt foundations, explains that: When he visited the Carnegie Endowment he was told that his request to view their records would be difficult because

"with the ratification by the Senate of the United States of the UN Treaty, our job was finished",

...so therefore, all records were in a warehouse.

(The fact is there exists no 'treaty' with the UN Organization since the Constitution provides for the U.S. to enter into treaties only with other nations. We must keep firmly in mind that the U.S. is merely a dues-paying member of that Organization and owes it no allegiance nor duty to obey its mandates. Other treaties and entangling alliances that are destructive to the peace, safety and wellbeing of Americans can and should be terminated.)

Mr. Dodd was invited to go to the warehouse and view the minutes of past meetings of the trustees of the Carnegie Endowment if he wished. In his testimony before an Illinois Senate Committee in 1978, Mr. Dodd told the state legislators - among other discoveries in the Carnegie meeting minutes - that:

"Now, we are back in the period of 1908, and these minutes reported the following: The Trustees . . . bring up a single question; namely, if it is desirable to alter the life of an entire people, is there any means more efficient than war to gain that end? And they discuss this question. . . and they come up with an answer-- there are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people.

That leads, then, to a question: How do we involve the United States in a war?

This was in 1909. I doubt if there was any question more removed, or any idea more removed from the minds of us, as a people, at that time than war. There were certain of what we call 'intermittent shows' in the Balkans, and I also doubt if very many of us knew, really, where the Balkans was, or their relation or possible effect on us.

. . . oh, before that, the Trustees then answered the question of how to involve us in a war by saying, 'we must control the diplomatic machinery of the United States'; and . . . the answer is 'we must control the State Department'.

Now, at that point, research discloses a relationship between the effort to control the State Department and an entity which the Carnegie Endowment set up – namely, the Council of Learned Societies. And through that entity are cleared all of the appointments – high appointments in the State Department, and they have continued to be cleared that way since then.

Now, finally, we are in a war. Eventually, the war is over, and the Trustees turn their attention, then, to seeing to it that life does not revert in this country to what it was prior to 1914; and they hit upon the idea that in order to prevent that reversion, they must control education in this country. They realized that that is a perfectly tremendous, really stupendous and complex task – much too great for them alone. So they approached the Rockefeller Foundation, with the suggestion that the task be divided between the two of them."

The Council of Learned Societies that Mr. Dodd mentions, undoubtedly became or was replaced by the Council on Foreign Relations which members have dominated the U.S. State Department since before World War II. Think about the alleged 'cause' of that first great war. Where did it begin? The Archduke of Austria was assassinated by a Jew in Sarajevo; Austria declared war. In 1909, five years earlier, the world troublemakers planned it that way.

It has also been written by historical researchers that the reason the war was held off until 1914 was that the same group that orchestrates and executes wars -- the International Zionist Bankers - first wanted the U.S. to pass the Federal Reserve Act so the American people could pay for the costs of the war. It passed. The Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913. The Great War broke out in 1914, as planned. We've paid and paid and paid.

Now, before we leave this very disturbing discussion of betrayal and treason by government 'leaders' there is one, more recent, account that must be told to fix in our minds once and for all the certainty that wars do not ever 'just happen'. If we consider it even briefly, we will realize that the average, sane, human being would rather never be involved, or have their loved ones involved in the horrors of war. That is a given. The following is excerpted from a book titled Body of Secrets by James Bamford.

"According to secret and long-hidden documents obtained for Body of Secrets, the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. In the name of antiCommunism, they proposed launching a secret and bloody war of terrorism against their own country in order to trick the American public into supporting an ill-conceived war they intended to launch against Cuba.

Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere.

People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war."

The name, Lemnitzer, has a familiar ring. A fairly extensive search produced no biography nor further background on Lemnitzer.

"The idea may actually have originated with President Eisenhower in the last days of his administration . . . . He wanted desperately to invade Cuba in the weeks leading up to Kennedy's inauguration; indeed, on January 3 he told Lemnitzer and other aides in his Cabinet Room that he would move against Castro before the inauguration if only the Cubans gave him a really good excuse.

Then, with time growing short, Eisenhower floated an idea. If Castro failed to provide that excuse, perhaps, he said, the United States "could think of manufacturing something that would be generally acceptable." What he was suggesting was a pretext of a bombing, an attack, an act of sabotage carried out secretly against the United States by the United States. Its purpose would be to justify the launching of a war. It was a dangerous suggestion by a desperate president."

If Eisenhower was desperate it would most likely be a desperate attempt to carry out the orders of his benefactors. That he 'floated the plan' is plausible, in view of what we've learned about him, although it would not be possible the idea was his. Presidents who are put in place by the world troublemakers, are not allowed to think or act without the input of their 'advisors'. (Another appropriate word for 'advisor' could be 'handler'.) In his Westpoint yearbook in 1915 Eisenhower was billed as the 'terrible Swedish Jew'.

First let's look at his meteoric rise to power from a Lt. Colonel in 1941 to a full general in 1942. After meeting and enchanting Anna Roosevelt Boettiger (formerly Dall) - FDR's daughter - at a dinner party, Ike was called to Washington for an interview in the White House. It is unknown to us exactly what took place in that interview, however, it appears Dwight David Eisenhower made the most favorable of impressions on president F. D. Roosevelt, for a few weeks later he was promoted to Chief of Staff of the 3rd Infantry Division.

[As an aside: Theodore Roosevelt, 5th cousin to FDR, was a descendant of Claas Martenszen von Rosenvelt (or von Rosenfeld, in the German form).  From The Strange Death of FDR, by Emanuel Josephson. Eleanor was Teddy Roosevelt's niece.]

After his first, other promotions came quickly for Ike, one upon the other:

* March 1941, promoted to Colonel, made Chief of Staff of the whole Ninth Army Corps;

* June 1941, made Chief of Staff of the U.S. Third Army;

* September 1941, promoted to brigadier general;

* February 1942, made Assistant Chief of Staff of the War Plans Division;

* March 1942, promoted to Major General, became head of the Operations Division of the War Department General Staff, when WPD was replaced by the OPD;

* June 1942, given command of the European Theatre of Operations;

* July 1942, promoted to Three-star General.

* February 1943, made Commander in Chief of all the Allied forces in Western Europe.

Bear in mind this man had never been in combat command nor engaged in battle. During the war he had no experience, little influence or power and had been shuffled quickly 'upstairs' so the behind-the-scenes soldiers could conduct their war. They gave him orders, he relayed the orders.

It was after the war that Ike made the difference. He is said to have written in a letter to Mamie, "God, how I hate these German"; his hatred took vent when the allied 'peace' was made. Under the Morgenthau Plan (Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury) details were spelled out to utterly destroy Germany forever and annihilate the German people.

While the German people were not annihilated, the soul and psyche of the people as a whole has born grave injury and oppression.

Later, Eisenhower was seated in the Oval Office by many influential and / or wealthy Jews of the Zionist persuasion. Some of those were Leonard Finder, Bernard Baruch, Oscar Hammerstein, Moss Hart, Richard Rodgers, Arthur Schwartz, Quintin Reynolds, Arthur Loew, William Zeckendorf, Max Kriendler, Jacob Potofsky, Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall and Michael Straight.

It should be coming clearer to our readers by the details of the past, that the current neverendingwar on terror has been promulgated by the same group using the same modus operandi: Create a disaster - this time 'terrorism' on American soil; unfurl the U.S. military flag (better known as the 'American' flag); gear up the God-awful propaganda machine; play patriotic music and battle hymns; sell war bonds to newly created Zionist-Inspired-Patriots, and send young men and women off to kill and die. All of this, mind you, without a declaration of war by the U.S. Congress.

And it should be clear by now that they will stop at nothing to further and fulfill their plan for World Dominion. No act is too heinous. No amount of human suffering and death matters, for you see, for them the end always justifies the means.

"Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit, will emerge the good of an unshakable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism.

The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful." Protocol No.1

One could presume that the 'short-sighted selfishness of U.S. policies after World War One' to which the sponsors of the aforementioned 1942 gathering of churchmen refered, would be the U.S. Congress' refusal to join the League of Nations, formerly dubbed the League to Enforce Peace. The name was changed to conceal its real purpose and the agenda of its architects.

Whose bright idea was the League to Enforce Peace? In The Secret World Government, by Major-General Count Cherep-Spiridovich, we read that Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow, at the Carlsbad Congress on 8-24-1922 boasted:

"The League of Nations is a Jewish idea. We created it after a fight of 25 years".

In a footnote the author explains:

"The League of Nations is entirely run by the Jews: Paul Hymans (Pres. of the Council); Sir J. Eric Drummond (Secr. General); Paul Mantoux (Chief of the most important Political Section) Major Abraham (Assist. Chief, Political Section); Mrs. N. Spiller (Secretary, Political Section), etc. The Jews' valet, Albert Thomas who helped with French millions to enthrone the Judeo-Mongol bolsheviks in Russia, is the Chief of the Labor Section. He receives a fabulous salary . . . "

That same League is now known as the United Nations. Who wields the power of the UN is clearly seen today in the unspeakable atrocities being committed by Israel against the Palestinians. The 'squeaks' of protest emanating from the UN are not unlike the same squeaks in 1956 when Israel attacked Egypt.

The last few chapters of Reed's book detail chronologically the true facts surrounding that attack, as well as the manipulations from many and varied sources who coerced the member nations of the UN in 1948 to vote for the 'partitioning' of Palestine - creating the State of Israel amidst a swirl of intrigue, outright murders, and alleged suicides of any who opposed the partitioning. Neither the opponents' station in life nor rank of office was an impediment to their demise, including Mr. James Forrestal, then Secretary for Defense under Harry Truman.

When the UN recently announced it was sending investigators to the middle east, Israel commanded the UN to 'back off; stay out'. The Zionist- controlled world 'peacekeeping' body obeyed with a genuflect. A few days later the Associated Press radio news reported a revealing statement by Ariel Sharon of Israel's Operation Defensive Shield - the ongoing massacre of Palestinians:

"Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon says the U.S. helped prevent a UN inquiry into a military offensive that was conducted last month in the Jenin refugee camp on the West Bank. Last night at a speech in Washington, Sharon said Israel could have been trapped in a very complicated situation by the UN probe.

Sharon also said the U.S. and Israel are standing together in the fight against terrorism."

Naturally, nothing more has been said about a UN probe, as though it had never been discussed. About the League of Nations, Henry Ford wrote in July, 1920:

"The Jews today are the only people whose special and extraordinary privileges are written into the world's Treaty of Peace."

Excerpts of the League treaty agreement are transcribed in the book from which we have quoted the various Protocols. (appendix D)

Today, Christian churches along with elected officials of the Constitutionally 'sovereign' states in the United States of America bow - in fact grovel - to the United Nations Organization. UN mandates are being implemented by elected officials at the state and very most local levels of government in all States of the union.

That assertion is substantiated by an article featured in the October-December, 1991 issue of the Journal of State Government - a quarterly magazine published especially for state legislators by the Rockefeller founded and funded CSG (Council of State Governments). The excerpted article reads: (emphasis added)

FOREIGN RELATION AT THE STATE LEVEL

"The globalization of state governments is receiving a tremendous amount of publicity at the international, national, state and local levels... Every state legislature has a productive role to play in the globalization phenomenon.

State governments have an important role to play, not only in understanding where they fit in but also in erecting what President George Bush [the Elder] has called the New World Order.

This order -- if implemented properly - will emphasize collective security, international cooperation and a dependence on international law to resolve conflicts, promote economic and social development and create a respect for human rights.

Predictably, state governments - and legislatures in particular - will be pivotal players in this international scenario. We are living in a global environment that offers new challenges, demands and problems.

We must prudently, yet forcefully, seize the opportunity and be constructive players."  by: John 'Eck' Rose, President Pro Tem, Kentucky Senate - 1991 

We must prudently, yet forcefully..." Take just a moment to consider the significance of the term 'enforce peace', as in 'League to Enforce Peace'. How does one enforce without using force? Must we acquiesce then to the oxymoronic, Orwellian maxim that War is Peace? To do that, we must admit to double- mindedness... a form of insanity.

[Aside: Searching the internet for a bio on John 'Eck' Rose led to the Kentucky State Library on line. We weren't able to enter without a library card. However, when Mr. Rose's name came up, in parenthesis we read (see Rosen). Whether his real last name is Rosen - or possibly a family name is unknown. It's possible.]

We have been told that America's New War in which we have been enmeshed to 'make the world safe from terrorism; safe for democracy' will last 'maybe... forever'.

According to part one of a recent Washington Post series on the events of the World Trade Center catastrophe: George Bush informed the people of America at 11:45 a.m. on September 11th, 2001, that 'America has to prepare for a NEW WAR against a new enemy'... terrorism.

They would have us believe then that in less than three hours from the time of the 'attack', the president schemed up the neverendingwar while cruising around in Air Force One. Before the end of September, Bush and his gang were revealing the Zionist plan to begin the final conflict -- WWIII -- with statements such as:

"This is a war and it will not be a short war."

"This will not be over quickly."

"Americans need to be prepared for more sacrifices and more casualties."

"We have a war plan that will work, over whatever period of time it requires."

"There will be many casualties."

It has become pitifully clear to most Americans that George W. is not the sharpest knife in the drawer; therefore, to believe that he dreamed up this present awful killing-spree would require a great stretch of anyone's imagination. Whose plan is it then? On this, the Protocols are quite clear:

"Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught" Protocol No.1

"Remember the French Revolution, to which it was we who gave the name of 'Great': the secrets of its preparations are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands. Protocol No.3

"At the present day we are, as an international force, invincible, because if attacked by some we are supported by other States." Protocol No.3

"But if we give the nations of the world a breathing space the moment we long for is hardly likely ever to arrive."  Protocol No.10

Remember - the Protocols were first published in England in 1906. Nearly a hundred years later, on April 27, 2002 an article in the Arizona Daily Star says it another way, with a statement by Ra'anan Gissen, a senior adviser to Ariel Sharon.

 WWIII Is Coming 'Whether They Like It Or Not' - Top Sharon Aide

"The Terror attacks on September 11 and extreme turmoil in the Middle East point to one thing - World War III, a spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Friday during a visit to Tucson."  

"We've been fighting a war for the past 18 months, which is the harbinger of World War III. The world is going to fight, whether they like it or not. I'm sure". [Gissen stated]

After WWI, the Versailles treaty - of which the measures against Germany guaranteed a second World War - M. Clemenceau boasted that 'we are carrying the war on into the peace'. Yes their version of peace was carried right into WWII, and here we are today in the beginning of their intended final conflict.

As for the Versailles Treaty, for the sake of history, it should be known that according to Captain A.H.M. Ramsey, in his 1952 book The Nameless War:

"All important decisions were taken by the 'Big Four' - Britain, France, Italy and the U.S.A., represented respectively by Mr. Lloyd George, M. Clemenceau, Baron Sonino, and President Wilson.

What is not known is that the secretary of Mr. George was the Jew, Sassoon; of M. Clemenceau the Jew Mandel Rothschild, now known as Mandel; Baron Sonino (Italy) was himself half a Jew; and President Wilson had the Jew, Brandeis. The interpreter was another Jew named Mantoux; and the Military Advisor yet another Jew called Kish.

It is known that Mr. George and others were hazy about geography. Their Jewish secretaries, however, were on the contrary very much on the spot on such matters. These Jews met at 6 p.m. in the evenings and mapped out the decisions for the following day's conference of the 'Big Four'.

The results were disastrous from the point of view of all decent people, who hoped for an honorourable treaty, with terms which, though they might be stringent, would at least be just and thereby secure lasting peace."

As a final result, millions of German people suddenly found themselves living in the newly made Communist-controlled 'countries' of Poland and Czechoslovakia. We wonder how they intend to rearrange the Americas after or during the current neverendingwar?

To that query about their plans for 'the Americas' we found this in the book titled, Fundamental Laws: A Report of the 68th Convocation of the Rose Cross Order, (situated in Quakertown, Pennsylvania). On page 23, the Introduction To The Great Seal by R. Swinburne Clymer, July 6th, 1916, excerpted:

"More than a year ago, Grace K. Morey, the author of the article, "The Great Seal of the United States and Its Mystic Significance", prepared a sketch for a short primer of the Illuminati teachings...

If the student will give serious study to the article on the Seal of the United States, he will find that on the reverse side of the seal which is as yet uncut, there is to be found the Pyramid, but with the capstone as yet not placed, and thus he will see that the Philosophy of the Illuminati is the absolute and undeniable Philosophy upon which these United States are founded as is clearly indicated by... the drawings of the reverse side of the United States seal.

And thus it would appear that the Unseen Hierarchies which shaped the foundation of the great Republic which must some day rule the world, are the same Hierarchies which gave us the Soul Science Philosophy as taught by the Illuminati.

And now let us look into the future, not far, but just beyond the line. We find that scholars condemn the design of the reverse side of the United States Seal, that it has never been cut but has remained hidden as though it were something to be ashamed of.

However, though this appears the truth, it is not the truth. The reason why it has never been cut is because the time is not yet as the cap-stone has not yet been set.

And what is this cap-stone?  My reader, prepare for a shock.

When Atlantis ruled the world, that which is now America was connected with Egypt by what is now Mexico, and in Mexico, in the territory of Yucatan, there is a Pyramid in which the Fire Philosophers worshipped God as Divine Fire and Life in like manner as did the Initiates of Egypt, for the two were then one.

America is not complete, and will not be complete, cannot be complete, until Mexico is again part of America as she was in the long ago, and when Mexico is once again a part of the United States, then will the cap-stone have been set on the Pyramid and the reverse side of the United States seal will be cut.

May it not be long until the Holy Pyramid shall be completed and may it be completed without the shedding of blood. " page 24

May it be completed without the shedding of blood? The shedding of blood is part and parcel of the plan! They are the blood sacrifices to their King Despot of the Blood of Zion! If you doubt it, read in the Old Testament the blood rituals of the Priests of Jehovah. They drenched themselves in blood: on their heads, on their robes, all over the ground around them... to pacify a blood-thirsty deity to which Judeo-Christians, along with the Jews, pay homage today.

For our readers who have not seen the drawing of the above mentioned 'uncut reverse seal' of the U.S., look at the back of the one-dollar bill. The Great Seal is identical to the drawing featured in the book from which we excerpted above.

You will see the cap-stone above the pyramid waiting to be attached. The Latin words "Annuit Coeptis" mean "our enterprise". The Latin words "Novus Ordo Seclorum" mean literally, "new order of the ages" or in the modern translation - New World Order. The Roman Numerals MDCCLXXVI (1776) commemorates not the Declaration of Independence as we would expect, but the founding of the Illuminati on May 1st, 1776.

We carry their symbolic debt notes (slave credits/dollars) around and the more of them we have the wealthier we believe we are. Jesus told us not to store up our treasure on earth, for where our treasure is, there also is our heart. We will take up this issue of 'bogus money' again, later. There is an alternative, after all.

Let us return now to the aforementioned meeting of 375 appointed representatives of 30-some denominations. John Foster Dulles, Chair of that meeting, was a wise choice to further the Zionist plan for World Dominion. Some of Dulles' credentials include:

"The United Nations represents not a final stage in the development of world order, but only a primitive stage. Therefore its primary task is to create the conditions which will make possible a more highly developed organization."

We can see today that those conditions have been created as the World Trade Center tragedy 'made possible the more highly developed organization' in the form of a Coalition of Nations to fight terror. The various nations are presently choosing up sides. And we can bet that, just as in Orwell's 1984, the sides will be shifting constantly to keep the war going. . . maybe forever.

Nearly twenty years after that 1942 Federal Council of Churches proclaimed their vision for the new world order, a General Conference of the Methodist Church was held in Australia on July 17, 1960, at which the attendees adopted a dandy resolution on behalf of all methodists. From The Worlds Trouble Makers by Methodist minister, Bruce H. Brown, who attended that conference we read:

"We deplore the continuance of anti-Semitism anywhere... and call upon all Australians resolutely to combat every manifestation of this evil in our society.

. . We express our deep conviction that any real solution can be achieved only in conformity with the principles of the United Nations Charter."

A copy of that statement - purporting to express the attitude of all the Methodists in Australia and New Zealand - was sent to the Prime Ministers of Australia and South Africa; to the President of the South African Methodist Conference; and to the Moderator of the Dutch Reformed Church.

Today - in Australia, New Zealand, Europe and Canada - people are sitting in prisons for the crime of 'Anti-Semitism' because they dared to even question the veracity of the historical presentation of the so-called Jewish Holocaust during WWII.

Never mind the fact that six million Jews did not live in the whole of Europe at that time.

Never mind that logistically, it would have been impossible to exterminate and cremate or bury six million bodies within the time-frame in which it allegedly occurred.

Never mind that Samuel Untermeyer, in his speech 8-7-1933 from WABC radio declaring a 'holy war' against Germany via a worldwide boycott on all German made goods (transcribed fully the following day in the New York Times) claimed not six million but '600,000 souls must be rescued'. Untermeyer also mentioned that there were Jews who opposed the boycott and accused them of being 'traitors to their race'.

"For the Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell as we can with the aid of our Christian friends, if we have the will to act."  

And never mind the fact that, according to Historian David Irving in his book Nuremberg: The Last Battle, the six-million hoax was apparently hatched during WWI. They evidently decided to save it for the already planned WWII:

"In a 1919 essay by a former governor of New York (Martin Glynn), readers were told that '6 million Jews are dying in a threatened holocaust of human life' as victims of 'the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood'." from Barbarians Inside the Gates, by Donn de Grand Pre'   

Author, Bruce H. Brown, referring to the alleged problems discussed at the 1960 Australian Methodist Conference, asserts:

"It was not explained in the statement that all the disturbing subjects mentioned are products of Jewish activity. Perhaps the authors did not know this. There are some Methodists, however, who do know the facts and must therefore repudiate the statement in its entirety. As one of these I regard the statement as a document professing Christ but serving anti-Christ...

Not any of these things has a natural basis. All are the result of planning and organising. Not any of them is of recent origin. All are products of a mentality of long standing and little variation. They are the outcome of a particular philosophy, behind which is the objective of World Dominion. The people who are seeking World Dominion are known as Jews, and this idea is not a figment of the imagination of some obsessed Gentiles, as will be clearly shown." 

Quoting from a writing by Stephen Ames, Jr:

"The Truth of the matter is that the entire world has been deceived by a handful of people. They have hidden the Truth in order to keep the people passive. Why do you think King George in the fraud known as the Treaty of Peace (1783) declares himself to be -- and this is word for word:

Prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire, & C. and of the United States of America.

If you don't believe it, go to: 8 U.S. Statutes at Large page 80."

It should now be obvious that the so-called Christian churches have long been promoting the political plan for World Dominion as outlined in the Old Testament by the Pharisaical Talmudic Priests - today's Rabbis. The world is to be ruled by the same priesthood... controlled by a few perverted, evil, unconscionable creatures who are NOT implementing a plan laid out by a loving Creator.

Churchmen then preach the 'end times', using as evidence the prevailing, world-wide horror and chaos to which they have become party, and claim it's 'God's plan'. They know, you see, because it's 'in the Book'.

As we observe the tangled web of the strategy behind the planned persecution of the Jews along with the underlying motive for their persecution, we gain some insight into the overall political program for World Dominion which by all indications was laid well before recorded history (or at the least, history which has been kept secret) by a handful of unseen and unknown creatures. The insight offered here is limited by our still limited view. The Protocols refer to a time line at least twice, this first from Protocol No.1 is a repeat:

"Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught."

Protocol No.5 again mentions the time frame:

"For a time perhaps we might be successfully dealt with by a coalition of the goyim of all the world: but from this danger we are secured by the discord existing among them whose roots are so deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up.

We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the goyim, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries."

The seeds of discord have taken root and can never be plucked up. That would depend solely upon the individual - each individual - to decide.  That would mean you, and that would mean me.

'Personal and national reckonings, religious and race hatreds which we have fostered. . . '.  Having noticed this process before having read the Protocols; then, having read the Protocols and seeing the whole scheme laid out was the sole purpose of this paper; that every reader may be aware of the manipulation in order that you may choose, if you will, to begin to reason and express accordingly, from a new place in mind, from a spiritual level, rather than from the purposely induced strife out of which we mostly function.

Whoever or whatever group or force devised this scheme, they are not Jews. They call themselves Jews so their lesser brethren can take the brunt of the results of their deeds. And their lesser brethren play into the scheme perfectly, because they truly believe they have been 'chosen' as a special people by 'their' God, which has imbued in them a sense of superiority over all the 'dumb goyim'. The only way out of the web is to divest ourselves of their religious lies -- all of us, including Judeo-Christians. Simply stop buying and playing into their mind games.

The term 'creatures' was used in reference to the unseen, unknown group or force behind this nasty program, in view of the inhumanity to man we're experiencing as a result of 'the Law' being implemented and enforced throughout America and all nations of the world today. The pity of it all is that it is man who passes, implements, judges and enforces the laws upon and against his follow man. We only know the source of this Law against mankind to be from the Babylonian Talmud, the Holy book of the so-called Jews.

Before 'the Law' was written, from whence its source (the Ancient Priesthood) came remains a mystery... at least for me, for now. The Jewish masses - those born into the religion of Talmudism and referred to as 'the lesser brethren' by Zionist leaders - are a front and a scapegoat for the authors of the Law. It is a deadly law, which intends to fully enslave all people in the world... body, mind and soul. We should be mindful of Jesus' warning to:

"... fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell Matt. 10:28

In the late Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent, Issue of April 30, 1921, Ford transcribed a letter from a Jew, Oscar Levy addressed from the Royal Societies Club, dated July, 1920. In his letter to Mr. George Pitt-Rivers, Oscar Levy said of his race:

"We who have promised to lead you to a new Heaven, we have finally succeeded in leading you into a new Hell..."

It could be said that the Jews are the carriers of the Law, and of its deadly virus of perversion, hatred, war, famine... utter destruction as mandated by Jehovah through Moses, not because they were 'chosen', but because a small tribe - some 3,000 years ago, and the descendants of a large tribe (Khazars) that adopted Talmudism nearly 1,300 years ago - failed to resist the lure of earthly treasure - riches, land, dominion over all people. Few resist the lure today. The plan appeals to the basest instincts in man separate and apart from our spiritual goodness and wholeness as a child of Creator.

That is not to insinuate that the Jews are the sole cause of the woes that have befallen this world and its people. It is true that the Jews have been ruled and controlled by their Rabbis throughout the ages. So have Christians, especially Roman Catholics, been controlled by their religious leaders; and as we shall see, most denominations of the so-called Christian churches today preach the religion of the Jews... Jehovah's Kingdom on Earth.

The primary catalyst which most surely and steadily powers the plan is the intense religious belief by hundreds of millions of people that it is the plan of a loving God. Therefore, both Jews and Christians have eagerly embraced the evil spreading in epidemic proportions over this planet believing it is the sign of their messiah's 'coming'. They are unaware of the fact that they are speaking the apocalyptic devastation into existence. Jesus told us of the power of our words (and thoughts) in Matt. 12:36,37 when he said:

"But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."

As well as the belief in and urgent prayers going out for the fulfillment of this unholy plan, being opposite of all that is Holy, and good and loving, it cannot succeed without the necessary negative energy to drive it forward: that is the energy lent by its minions - regardless of color race or creed - who succumb to the 'rewards' offered (to whom ever is willing to barter his soul in exchange for favors, whatever those favors might be).

The energy that propels this plan is also fed and strengthened and thrives on that which we seemingly so willingly give, unaware of the ramifications to ourselves and its impact on the ultimate outcome of the struggle between good and evil.

"Not me" you say? Yes, you. And me. Every one of us, if we are honest, will admit that it is so. Consider this:

Each time we make a choice to disregard the true LAW of Creator - which is Love - we become witting dupes in the game. That is not to say we consciously invite evil into our lives, although there are many who obviously believe that material possessions, power and influence are worthy of the exchange of their souls.

However, those of us who mistakenly believe that our isolated acts of pettiness, thoughtlessness, carelessness, meanness, lying, cheating, stealing, and so forth, go without effect must consider the power of, and accept the responsibility for our contribution to the powers of darkness. Those isolated and subtle acts - small acts of evil - open the door for larger ones.

The system itself is designed to dehumanize all who partake in it. The first step in the dehumanization process is a loss of compassion.

Many people who work for governments, government agencies, or hold seats of office - whether they be elected or appointed - consistently commit unconscionable acts against their fellow man in the 'name of the law' or 'just doing their job'. It is a given that most of the jobs cannot be done with compassion, and an individual who is compassionate cannot do the jobs... at least not as they're ordered to do.

The law-makers themselves close their eyes to the evil they do every time they pass another law or ordinance without having read and sincerely considered the impact on people's lives, irregardless of the sanctity of life. Their Godless laws have made criminals of people who have neither infringed upon nor injured another party. 'Crimes against the State', often times bear heavy penalties from imprisonment and fines to property forfeiture.

Civil servants are servants of government, not the people. Law Enforcers - once called peace officers - enforce the Godless laws dehumanized law-makers make with brute force, stun guns, handcuffs and high-powered rifles. Just doing their job.

Administrators of Godless laws which destroy people's lives, routinely steal homes and property for taxes or other 'legal' reasons. They kidnap children under some pretext of child abuse, i.e. parents' refusal to vaccinate, administer psychotropic drugs, or who are simply 'accused' of any other of a myriad of legal trespasses, including spanking. The administrators are usually always accompanied by armed law enforcers. Just doing their job.

Aside from the unbearable anguish of the parents, can you imagine the paralyzing fear of children who are snatched up bodily by a stranger? or two or three strangers if a child resists? and carried off to become a ward of the state, placed in a home with total strangers? One mother had her infant stolen immediately after birth, literally pulled away from its mother's breast. It was recently reported that a five year old in Florida is 'missing somewhere in the system'. It took them months to realize they have no knowledge of the child's whereabouts.

Remember what Jesus said about those who would harm children? In Matt.18:6 he said:

"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck and he were drowned in the depth of the sea." 

Teachers - most of whom are victims of mind control themselves as a result of intensive indoctrination in schools and colleges - perpetuate the indoctrination by methods they're taught to use on innocent children.

Parents who have been made aware of the dangers, who have an alternative and willingly hand their children into the hands of the government 'educators' are in dereliction of their duty as parents to protect their children. Failure to protect our children carries the same weight as an act of violence committed on them.  

Most people who knowingly commit and continue to commit acts which violate the true LAW claim they 'have no choice' because they have to keep a job, or follow orders of a superior, or any number of excuses. They go along to get along.

We always have a choice, and that choice needn't always be finding another job. How, then, could we or others do our job without violating God's LAW? Jesus told us how in Matt. 7:12

"Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that man should do to you, do you even so to them."

If enough individuals followed that maxim, the nature of the job itself would be transformed into a good and beneficial and worthwhile purpose. That applies to every situation for all of us, all mankind of all colors and all faiths. We have come to recognize that statement as The Golden Rule: 'Do unto others as you would have others do unto you'. That's what's missing and it is for each and every one of us to ponder what choices we will continue to make, and whether we will continue breaking God's LAW with justification.

However we justify trespass, we will not avoid the resulting effects. That is inescapable, for energy is a cycle that returns to the sender, whether that be our thoughts, words, or deeds; it is a certainty that 'what goes around, comes around'.

So we find that our moments of confrontation - the choices between right and wrong, good and evil - come in the home, in the office, in the street, in all of our relationships where decisions are made on practical human grounds.

Evil is insidious and skillful in its disguise; it doesn't play fair; and it is empowered by a collective lifetime thousands of years old. Evil is everywhere: in self-interest, ambition, greed and perceived need alike, and is almost always cloaked in some less recognizable disguise... even that of simple omission. As Edmond Burke said,

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men do nothing." 

Conversely our thoughts, words and acts of kindness and true compassion -- in other words LOVE -- can literally shine away the darkness, for it is true that darkness is nothing more than the absence of light. It goes without saying of course, that without the light, darkness would be all-encompassing. Of that, Jesus said:

"Ye are the light of the world... Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.

Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven." Matt. 5:14-16

The emphasis on 'perceived needs' was intentional to draw your attention to the fact that in fact our 'needs' are always met if we will remove the blocks to our awareness of that condition. We are created fully, wholly and completely, and abundance in all things is supplied. Our concerns for the future, belief in need and want, fear of lack, creates a perception of lack. Our perception seems real, because it is ours; we made it. When the blocks are removed, there is no want nor 'need'.

Suffice it to say that both Jews and Christians alike, including all sects and devotees of all religions, have been used to bring the plan for World Dominion to its present state of fruition. As we are experiencing just its preliminary effects today we should, at this point, be well aware that it is not a nice plan. It IS a political program for World Dominion cloaked in religion, with promises of peace, love, joy, prosperity right here on earth... for a thousand years anyway. Wasn't it Marx who said that religion is the opiate of the masses?  

In the Oscar Levy letter to Mr. Pitt-Rivers - previously mentioned - Mr. Levy also said:

"Are not they [Jews] the inventors of the Chosen People Myth

And is not this obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation, however small and insignificant it may be?

And then think of the history of nationalism. It started in our time as a reaction against Napoleon;

... Napoleon was the antagonist of the French Revolution;

the French Revolution was the consequence of the German Reformation;

the German Reformation was based upon a crude Christianity;

This kind of Christianity was invented, preached and propagated by the Jews THEREFORE the Jews have made this war!"  [speaking of WWI] 

No, it wasn't 'the Jews' that made that war. It was the Zionist Money Masters - the minions of the priesthood - that made that war. That statement, though, is a perfect example of how hatred has been generated against the Jews. And who made the statement? A self-proclaimed Jew. Knowing human nature as they do, the Ruling Sect flaunt their evil acts in the faces of the goyim (all non-Jews), inciting and goading them to retaliate against the 'lesser brethren'... those who were born into Talmudism.

The Jews are in a unique situation, however, as Steven Jacobson so eloquently pointed out in his introduction to this essay. The only way they can escape their dilemma is to throw off the bondage of the Torah and the Talmud -- combined as their 'Holy Book(s)'. Raised in a Jewish family, Steven 'knew' as a child that he did not belong to that creed. He refused to attend Hebrew school, did experience the cruelty of children who reflect their parents' prejudices, and has moved beyond the mind game, in a quest of spiritual truth and understanding.

As he suggested, there undoubtedly will be some readers who see this this as an 'anti-Semitic' assault on the Jews. Those of us caught in the religious lies are all persecuted, by our own belief systems. The same 'Christian' who chastised me for quoting the Protocols, calling it 'an anti-Semitic piece of fraudulent trash', also accused Steve Jacobson as being "New Age" when he suggested on a Sweet Liberty broadcast that in order to find truth, we must take time to become quiet and turn our attention inward to that place within where truth abides. He suggested that we meditate.

Her 'Christian' view of meditation is 'new age', never mind that the word can be found in the Christian Bible nineteen times; and never mind that Jesus is quoted as saying that, "the Kingdom of God is within you". If that is so, it would follow that the truth will be found there, also.

The Orthodox Jews today who so vociferously protest Zionism, who claim that Zionism does not represent Jewry, and yet who cling to the tenets of the Torah and the Talmud will continue to drive the plan of World Dominion forward, because the plan is contained within the Torah itself. For Judeo-Christians, it can be read in the first five books of the Old Testament. Therefore, unless they divest themselves of the destructive shackles of their 'religion', Jews will continue to be used by the Zionist leaders as the victims of persecution. And they will be guilty as charged by the goyim.

Once again, it is a matter of choice; although to the Jew born into Talmudism along with the belief that he or she is special, 'the chosen' of their god Jehovah - it would most probably not appear as a choice. How many, I wonder, will be willing to give up the lies that bind them to a religion of racism, death and destruction for a false promise of 'dominion over the world'?

In the book from which we've quoted the Protocols - the first half of which is a history of how they came about - the following excerpt and assertions should be seriously contemplated by every Jew and Christian alike. Addressing the power struggle between the Sadducees and Pharisees, on page 88 we read:

The Pharisees, who, although they professed as one of their chief tenets, the utmost contempt of the 'am haretz' or simple people, did not overlook the fact that they needed their mass support for the attainment of their own aim, and they enlisted it by opposing the Sadducean strictness of the Law in many instances. . .

The power of the Sadducees fell with the destruction of the Temple by Titus and thenceforth the Pharisaic element held supremacy among the Jews. Quoting an acknowledged authority on Judaism, Mr. Flavien Brenier, Lt. Gen. Netchvolodow further describes the policy of the sect as follows:

"Before appearing proudly as the expression of Jewish aspirations, The Tradition of the Pharisees had serious difficulties to surmount, the chief of which was the revival of the orthodox faith stimulated in the Jewish people by the Captivity.

To the exiles, bemoaning the fall of the Temple of Jerusalem and begging Jehovah to end the misfortunes of their homeland, the revelation that Jehovah was only a phantom, entailed not only certain defeat, but also their own exposure to perils the last of which would have been the loss of all authority over Israel.

This religion of Man divinised, which they had absorbed at Babylon they conceived solely as applying to the profit of the Jew, the superior and predestined being. The promises of universal dominion. . . that of a material domination to be imposed on the universe by the Jews.

The awaited Messiah was. . . a temporal king, bloody with battle, who would make Israel master of the world and 'drag all peoples under the wheels of his chariot'.

One cannot better define its action in the midst of Jewish society before Jesus Christ, than in comparing it with that of the Freemasons in modern society. A carefully restricted membership tightly bound, imposing on their members the religion of 'the secret', the Pharisees pursued relentlessly their double aim which was:

1. The seizure of political power, by the possession of the great political offices (the influence of which was tremendous in the reconstituted Jewish nation) and the conquest of the Sanhedrin (Jewish parliament.)

2. To modify gradually the conceptions of the people in the direction of their secret doctrine." 

Toynbee referred to the source from whence the plan came as the 'creative minority'. He was not referring to those whose names are familiar to many of us: Rothschild, Warburg, Kuehn, Loeb, Schiff, Frankfurter, Brandeis, Untermeyer, Baruch, Rockefeller and others who have appeared to be in control of the world's social, judicial, educational and economic systems, along with the governments of the nations.

The creative minority to which Toynbee referred are an unknown few who control that group. An interesting comment on that - whether true or not - in a small book titled Handbook For The New Paradigm, it states that:

"Those who think they are in control and planning this scenario are just as controlled as their plan for you."

For at least 3,000 years the Jews - and over the past 2,000 years the Christians - have been programmed by religious leaders to believe that the Jews are God's chosen people.

Christians believe it because it says so in the Old Testament, which was tacked onto the front of the New Testament centuries ago by the 'holy fathers' of the Roman Catholic church - the foundation of the Christian church as we know it today. At that time the Old Testament was given precedence over the New along with equal divine status as the 'word of God'.

The belief was injected into our Christian minds as babes that 'In the end times Jesus will return to reign on earth for a thousand years of PEACE, after which, Satan will once again be released'. For what? To start it all over again? We ingested that belief with our mother's milk and it appears to have become part of our cellular structure.

We were all born into a great lie. Possibly that is what is meant by the Elders in the Protocols: that its root is so firmly implanted it can never be plucked out. If you believe that lie, then you are doomed to live therein. There is no power on this third dimensional plane, nor anywhere in Creation, greater than the power of Creator -- which is within you. There you will find the Will and the Way to impugn the lie.

To realize that the Christian belief -- of God's Kingdom on earth -- follows a perfectly parallel path with the Talmudic political program for World Dominion which has been given to Jews as their religion... to realize that the story is one and the same is startling to say the least. However, according to Moses Mendelssohn, a learned Jew:

"Judaism is not a religion, but a Law religionized."

That 'parallel path' is not intended to clash, conflict, or cross at some junction, but to so slowly and subtly merge that we will all simply open our eyes one day to the awareness that we are on the same path... have always been on the same path, always having had two separate destinations in mind.

2,300 years ago, Plato called it 'The Third Way'... a merging of what has been presented as diametrically opposed concepts. Today, we have Judeo-Christianity.

Jews have been awaiting their messiah for 3,000 years; while Christians have been awaiting the return of their Messiah for 2,000. And the same small group made up the same story for all of us. In his time, Jesus identified that group as the Pharisees, including with the Pharisees as perpetrators of the lie... the Scribes.

Today, the Scribes are known as lawyers, and their function is the same today as it was then. They write the laws, interpret the laws, and have imprisoned millions of innocent people under those laws which have their basis in the Talmud. Once again, the Protocols spelled it out perfectly, as in Protocol No. 9:

"Above the existing laws without substantially altering them, and by merely twisting them into contradictions of interpretations, we have erected something grandiose in the way of results.

These results found expression first in the fact that the interpretations masked the laws: afterwards they entirely hid them from the eyes of the governments owing to the impossibility of making anything out of the tangled web of legislation"

Please! Take note of this! The glaring contradiction in the Laws of the 'would-be- gods' on earth is the fact that man-made laws are changeable, open to interpretation, written so as to create confusion; the LAW of Creator is immutable, changeless, and simple: "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you, for as you sow, that you shall also reap".

Jews should consider this seriously. The mandates of their 'phantom deity' - Jehovah - as taught by the Pharisaic Rabbis, is wide open to interpretation, as evidenced in the sixty-three volumes of their ruminatings -- chewing over the question of whether or not it is permissible to kill a flea or a gnat on the sabbath. The Jews' religion has deprived them of the right to even seek the truth. Jesus taught that we must seek, and yet many Christians believe it is a 'sin' to question anything they're taught by their church leaders.

Brian Kennedy writes in his Freemasonic Destruction of Western Civilization:

"The U.S. legal system enshrined the Talmudic practice of building up 'case law' on fine distinctions, and hairsplitting nuances. Black can be made white or vice-versa, under such a system. It is a made-to-order recipe for tyranny and manipulation by unseen authority...

Of course, this was the intention from the very beginning. Jews have been controlled by their rabbis for two thousand years under the pernicious system."

Thus, hundreds of millions of mind-manipulated Jews and Christians passionately cry:

'Bring it on! Bring on the chaos, perversion, death and destruction! Bring on the vaccines that are killing our children! Bring on the chem-trails leaving their trails of disease and death! Bring on the New World Order. It's in the book! It's God's plan! Bring on the Terminator Seed, Bovine Growth Hormone, irradiated food, genetically engineered non-food! Our messiah is coming!'

And millions march off to WAR killing and dying for the World Order, exuberantly singing, 'Onward Christian Soldiers'. How awful. How pathetic. How sick. And all in the name of 'God'.  

In truth, it is all a whopper of a deadly lie, and if we don't wake up to it - Jew and Christian alike - we'll all end up slaves in a world that, I believe, will be more evil than we could bear to consider. The planned Messiah will be neither that one expectantly awaited by the Jews nor the Judeo-Christians. The Protocols give us a clue as to what to they have 'prepared for the world':

"When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned it is these same hands [the mob] which will sweep away everything that might be a hindrance thereto."  Protocol No. 3.

"Ever since that time [French Revolution] we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favour of that King Despot of the blood of Zion, whom we are preparing for the world." Protocol No. 3.

"However, it is probably all the same to the world who is its sovereign lord, whether the head of Catholicism or our despot of the blood of Zion." Protocol No.4.

Another relevant excerpt which appears to be happening as this is being written relates to the current expose of sexual indulgences by many Catholic priests - sodomizing young boys - who are bringing shame and defamation to the doorsteps of the church. The church, of course, has condoned this by simply sending the sexual criminals to a new place, where their malpractice is unknown, and creating the opportunity for other innocents to be molested and abused. From Protocol No. 17:

When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nation towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place.

The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the patriarch of an international Church.

And all people in all nations across the globe will be living in hell, right here on earth, in a 'kinder, gentler' world, as the Elder Bush claimed. Some insiders tell it like it really is intended to be. Jacques Attali, special advisor to French President Francois Mitterand for a decade, wrote a chilling book which we shall excerpt in more detail later, in which he describes the planned World Order like this:

"Future shock is yesterday. Change is the only constant in a world in upheaval... a new order is being born. In the next millennium, humanity's fate will be shaped by a new set of winners and losers...

Wealthy wanderers will everywhere be confronted by roving masses of poor nomads - boat people on a planetary scale seeking to escape from the destitute periphery, where most of the earth's population will continue to live.

These impoverished migrants will ply the planet, searching for sustenance and shelter...  they will live the life of the walking dead."

If the plan -- now well underway -- succeeds, the only escape from slavery will be extermination in the scheduled planet-depopulation agenda, which is also well underway via vaccines, chemtrails (aerial spraying), poisoned water, genetically modified food, and irradiation of those foods not genetically modified. The Jews of the world will succumb along with all other people of all religions.

Hundreds of millions - perhaps billions - will succumb in this final conflict being promulgated today. . .

UNLESS our minds and hearts are freed of the religious lies we've embraced, believing that this pervasive evil is the Divine Plan of our Loving Father/Creator/ God;

UNLESS we earnestly pray for Divine Guidance from within, where the Kingdom of God abides;

UNLESS enough good men and women do something as a result of that Divine Guidance; and the hating stops; and the Love is renewed.

Douglas Reed gives a thumbnail sketch of the 'verifiable' historical beginnings of this affair in his book, The Controversy of Zion. However, according to the many statements uttered from the mouths of the learned and infamous 'chosen of god' we could deduce that the plan was laid even before 458 BC.

"The true start of this affair occurred on a day in 458 BC... On that day the petty Palestinian tribe of Judah (earlier disowned by the Israelites) produced a racial creed, the disruptive effect of which on subsequent human affairs may have exceeded that of explosives or epidemics. This was the day on which the theory of the master-race was set up as 'the Law'.

The creed born in Judah 2,500 years ago, in the author's opinion, has chiefly brought this about. The process from original cause to present effect can be fairly clearly traced because the period is, in the main, one of verifiable history.

The creed which a fanatical sect produced that day has shown a great power over the minds of men throughout these twenty-five centuries; hence its destructive achievement. Why it was born ... is something that no one can explain. This is among the greatest mysteries of our world...

The impulse which at that remote time set many men searching for a universal, loving God produced this fierce counter-idea of an exclusive, vengeful deity. . .

Today the claim is often made that the religious man, Christian, Muslim or other, must pay respect to Judaism, whatever its errors, on one incontestable ground: it was the first universal religion, so that in a sense all universal religions descend from it. Every Jewish child is taught this.

In truth, the idea of the one-God of all men was known long before the tribe of Judah even took shape, and Judaism was above all else the denial of that idea. . . the Scripture produced in Judah of the Levites asked,

"Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the Gods?"
The sect which attached itself to and mastered the tribe of Judah took this rising concept of 'one-God of all-peoples' and embodied it in its Scripture only to destroy it, and to set up the creed based on its denial. It is denied subtly, but with scorn, and as the creed is based on the theory of the master-race this denial is necessary and inevitable.

A master-race, if there be one, must itself be God."

["Whoever slaps a Jew in the face has struck God himself" Talmud, Hulin 91b]

"The creed which was given force of daily law in Judah in 458 BC was then and still is unique in the world. It rested on the assertion, attributed to the tribal deity (Jehovah), that 'the Israelites' (in fact, the Judahites) were his 'chosen people' who, if they did all his 'statutes and judgments', would be set over all other peoples and be established in a 'promised land'.

Out of this theory, whether by forethought or unforeseen necessity, grew the pendent theories of 'captivity' and 'destruction'. If Jehovah were to be worshipped, as he demanded, at a certain place in a specified land, all his worshippers had to live there.

Obviously all of them could not live there, but if they lived elsewhere, whether by constraint or their own choice, they automatically became 'captives' of 'the stranger', whom they had to 'root out', 'pull down' and 'destroy'. Given this basic tenet of the creed, it made no difference whether the 'captors' were conquerors or friendly hosts; their ordained lot was to be destruction or enslavement..

What happened before 458 BC is largely lore, legend and mythology, as distinct from the period following, the main events of which are known.

Reed explains that in 458 BC the Levitical priests read aloud to the people (Judahites) their first written version of the Law, fresh from the pens of the priests in Babylon, and 'All the people wept when they heard the words of the Law' (Nehemiah 8:9).

Although Deuteronomy (which means 'second law') is the fifth book of the O.T., it was written first, and the other four were written as 'history' leading up to that 'Law'. Reed points out the contradictions in the Old Testament are a result of the priests combining some of the oral tradition with their new racial doctrine as a necessary expedient to render it palatable by the people.

For example, Jehovah tells his very special people to be kind to their neighbors, and then reverses that mandate by the commands to kill, rape, pillage and plunder their 'neighbors'. One particularly outstanding statute is from Deuteronomy 14:20 where Jehovah says: 'Ye shall not eat of any thing that dieth of itself', which sounds like good advice in that the thing had most likely died of disease or at the least, from old age. Jehovah, though continues:

"thou shalt give it unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou mayest sell it unto an alien, for thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God".

Earlier, in Deuteronomy 14:2 the 'specialness' is emphasized:

"For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God, and the Lord hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth."

The frightening reality of all this is that hundreds of millions of people - not alone the Jewish masses, but now the Christians - believe in the divinity of each and every word, interpreted in such a way as to fit the belief-system of choice, along with the 'chosen people' myth. They believe also that the racial, vengeful deity - Jehovah - is our loving Father / Creator of which Jesus spoke, and which is spoken in many places in the New Testament, as in I John, 4:7-8:

Beloved, let us love one another; for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth not, knoweth not God; for God is love.
GOD IS LOVE.

Concluding with Doug Reed: 

Before 458 BC there were in the main only 'oral traditions', the documentary period begins in the two centuries leading up to 458 BC, when Judah had been disavowed by the Israelites. At this stage, when the word-of-mouth tradition became written Scripture, the perversion occurred. The surviving words of the earlier Israelites show that their tradition was a widening one of neighbourliness under a universal God.

This was changed into its opposite by the itinerant priests who segregated the Judahites and established the worship of Jehovah as the god of racialism, hatred and revenge."

At this point it would be appropriate to address other versions of Christianity all of which claim their version to be the only true 'religion' when in fact they are most all offspring of British Israelism which is Zionism. From the Prologue of The Union Jack we read:

The fronts, names, terminology, cliches, etc. may or may not be consistent. They are many times contradictory. But British Israel, like anything else, must have a common denominator or an unchanging foundation upon which to build its deceptions. It is from this basic substance or common element which gives British Israel its life blood and which simultaneously gives us the necessary knowledge to understand it and combat it.
British Israel defined then means a World State (Government) Commonwealth Earthly Kingdom.

To teach the world through Christianity that the mission of the Messiah is to unify the world in a material and political sense is the false hope of Jew-Phariseeism and is as much to their own damnation as it is to that of professing Christians whom they have deceived.

The only difference in the Jew's religion (Kingdom of God on Earth) today and of antiquity is that the Jew's religion today is generally believed to be Christianity. Fundamentalism or Millennialism are fronts for this pseudo-Christianity. They lead one's faith into a carnal naturalism which appeals to the natural man.

British Israel can make a perfect front for patriotism except it must rear its head sooner or later to turn patriotism to treason by twisting it to World Government under the pretense of Bible sanction. Unclad of its Biblical and Christian cloak, British Israel is a world government religion...

So one can say he is a Fundamentalist or a Premillennialist or a Jehovah Witness, etc. but he is essentially and necessarily of the Jew's religion for all of the above require for their substance or faith an earthly kingdom. This is how British Israel can infect and infiltrate everything, adapting itself to any church, organization or name -- always skillfully insinuating and indoctrinating the earthly kingdom message...

Fundamentalist Christianity is a desecrating horror with a seductive appeal based on prophecy. It is the spirit of world-wide carnage which has reached crescendo proportions. It appropriates Christ's kingdom of salvation to a world political state under the veil of Biblical language and expressions. It is power politics operating to control humanity with a world government religion. It [Fundamentalist Christianity] is ZIONISM...

Some call themselves Covenant people. Some say they are Anglo Israel and drop the word British. Some say they are of the Israel Identity, even teaching that they are of certain of the twelve tribes or sub-tribes. To understand British Israel it is NOT necessary to learn a hundred different foolish names or fronts because they can add more daily.

The dogma of the cult is the important thing as we have said. This dogma or religion is the building of a unified humanity in a paradise earth. With this earthly kingdom idea sifted from the mixture of cults we at once see a panoramic view of the whole British Israel system including Mormonism, Jehovah Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventism, Herbert W. Armstrong's Church of God, and most of Protestantism. With this vast network of kingdom religionists, America has become a Jewish nation because the kingdom on earth (millennial reign of Christ) is the Jew's religion.

Let's look at just a few of these religions spun off from British Israel.

Christian (or Israel) Identity: Adherents to this religion have Biblically and historically 'proven' that the Jews aren't Jehovah's 'chosen people'. Instead it is claimed that the white-Anglo-Saxon race is the 'chosen' - the real Israelites - and most of them hate the Jews with a vengeance, advancing the plan of the Ruling Sect by their venomous castigation of all Jews.

If the assertions of Christian Identity adherents were true, it would also be true that they would be the ones who Jehovah commanded to constantly war with any tribe who was 'whoring after other gods', killing, raping, stealing, utterly destroying 'everything that breathes' - including innocent babes - in nearly every town they approached on their journey to the Promised Land. Except they claim America is the 'other Israel'... or something like that.

As well, it would be they who - contrary to Jesus' assertion that "My Kingdom is not of this world" - will have dominion over the earth and all its treasures, while the Kings and the riff-raff of the world grovel at their feet.

My question for the adherents to Christian Identity is: where, any where, in this savage creed, could one find even a remnant of true Christianity? Where is the Love?

Premillennial Dispensationalism: This is another equally oxymoronic term. While adherents to Christian Identity claim they are the 'chosen', Christian Premillennial Dispensationalists claim the Jews are the 'chosen'. Christians are apparently the cross-eyed step children who can be adopted (or grafted) into the Jew's circle by admission of certain religious beliefs. Then we'll all live happily for a thousand years when Jesus comes back. However, every Jew who does not accept Jesus as the Messiah will 'burn in hell', which adds another element to the pot.

Messianic Jews They are still the 'chosen' and having accepted Jesus as the Messiah - while continuing to adhere to the tenets and religious practices of the Talmud - are evidently all set for eternity... not to mention they get Dominion over the earth as promised by Jehovah; and all non-Jews (except the Christians who adopted the religion of the Jews) will serve them, after Jesus - who said his kingdom is NOT of this world - returns to establish his kingdom on earth.

Mormons: The founder of the Mormon religion, Joseph Smith, was a 33rd degree Mason who was ultimately hung for horse theft. The tenets of Mormonism are based on Freemasonry, and Mormons are also special in God's eyes. When they die the men - who have obeyed faithfully the tenets of the church - will themselves become gods of their own Universe. All their wives will rejoin their husband in his creative endeavors.

Jehovahs Witnesses They too have been set apart as special in that only 144,000 souls will make it to Heaven; the 144,000 - all Jehovah Witnesses - have already been chosen. The Witnesses who don't make it to Heaven will live here on earth with Jesus for a thousand years.

The non-Jehovah Witnesses will burn in hell, along with: non-baptized and otherwise sinful Protestant Christians; Catholics who don't attend mass or who commit any number of a myriad of sins (unless a priest presides at the death and forgives the sins, together with enough money paid by friends and family to get the deceased prayed out of purgatory); heretical Mormons, Witnesses, Muslims and of course Jews who didn't claim Jesus as their Messiah.

Incidentally, the earthly remains of Charles Tase Russell, the founder of Jehovah's Witnesses, lie in a cemetery near Pittsburgh. The headstone bearing a photograph of Russell is about ten feet up the hill from a rough-brown stone pyramid. Engraved on one side of the pyramid are the words: "Chas Tase Russell - 34 Holy". Each side of the pyramid sports an open Bible; engraved in a vertical row down the left hand side of each page are the numbers: 123456, 123456, 123456.

As one lifts his gaze from the three sets of sixes down the Bible page engraved on the pyramid, his eyes fix on another representation of the Satanic '666' theme. Adjacent from the pyramid, across the street, is the Greater Pittsburgh Masonic Temple which features three sets of six columns under peaked roofs. Six and Six and Six.  

Thomas S. McCall, Th.D. in his essay Israel: The Center of Divine History, sheds more light on Premillennial Dispensationalism including its importance to the success of the Zionist political program for World Dominion.

Something remarkable, though, was happening about the same time as Zionism was stirring in the hearts and minds of the Jewish people in the 19th century. An increasingly large minority of Christians began to re-discover the New Testament attitude of the early Christians toward Israel.
These Christians came to be known as Pre-millennialists, which refers to the belief that Christ will return to the earth before the Millennium. This will be a period of a thousand years during which Christ will reign on earth with Jerusalem, Israel, as His capital and holy city. They also call themselves Dispensationalists, because they interpret the Scriptures as portraying God as having arranged several dispensations throughout time...
These views became incorporated in a considerable movement in Evangelical Christianity in Europe and America, and became manifested in various gatherings, publications and institutions. Among these were the Keswick and Prophetic Conferences, the Scofield Reference Bible, Moody Bible Institute, the Bible Institute of Los Angeles, and Dallas Theological Seminary.

Most of the mainline Christian denominations did not embrace the Premillennial/ Dispensational position.

Many pastors and churches in most of the various Protestant denominations, though, began to preach and teach these views

The Dispensationalists believed these great truths had been lost through much of the Church age. Few, if any, have noted, though, that Zionism and Dispensationalist Christianity both came on the scene at practically the same time, the latter part of the 19th century!

While there was little direct communication between Zionism and Dispensationalism, it appears that neither would have flourished well without the other.

On the other hand, what would have happened if the efforts of the Zionists had not met with the approving encouragement of the Dispensationalist Christians?  

Most of the pastors and churches teach these views today because the training seminaries use the Scofield Reference Bible. Scofield was a scam artist who served time in prison for bilking the last pennies from his mother-in-law. Samuel Untermeyer took Scofield under his wing and introduced him to some wealthy Jewish friends who funded Scofield's work. The Scofield Reference Bible was published by the Oxford Press.

If you are a Christian, take a look at your Holy (Christian) Bible. The Old is positioned before the New Testament and constitutes seventy-five percent of the entire Christian Bible.  

"That's because the O.T. is the history of the Jews, and Jesus was a Jew". We've all heard that postulation time and again, parroted from the teachings of the so-called Christian ministers/priests/pastors. Christians claim Jesus was a Jew and that Christianity has its roots in Judaism/Talmudism. The Jews' Holy Book, the Talmud, claims Jesus was a bastard born of a whore.

Jesus was not a Jew, in the sense of the meaning of the word 'Jew' as 'a person who adheres to the religious practice called Pharisaism or Talmudism'. At that time in history, there was no religious, racial or national group in Judea known as 'Jews', nor had there ever been prior to that time. Judahites subscribed to the Pharisaical dogma; they were Talmudists. 

When the word 'Jew' was introduced into the English language its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was 'Judean'. However, from the 18th through 20th centuries a well organized and well-financed international 'pressure group' created a 'secondary meaning' for the word 'Jew' among the English- speaking people of the world. This 'secondary meaning' bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation - meaning 'Judean'. The secondary meaning today has practically totally eclipsed the original and correct meaning of the word. (from Facts Are Facts by Ben Freedman)

Basically, it comes down to this: If Jesus was a Judean, it has no bearing on the religion practiced by the Judeans at that time, nor on the given-meaning today, namely that a Jew is:

1) A person who professes the form of religious worship known as 'Judaism';

2) A person who claims to belong to a racial group associated with the ancient Semites;

3) A person directly the descendant of an ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible history; and/or

4) A a person blessed by divine intentional design with certain superior cultural characteristics denied to the other racial, religious or national groups, all rolled into one. 

Jesus was NOT a Jew in that sense of the word, and there is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who regards a 'Jew' as a 'Judean' in the literal sense of the word. We will defer here to the learned Rabbis, in the definition of that religious practice. From Facts are Facts, we read:

"Jesus abhorred and denounced the form of religious worship practiced in Judea in His lifetime and which is known and practiced today under its new name 'Judaism'. That religious belief was then known as 'Pharisaism'.

The Christian clergy learned that in their theological seminary days but they have never made any attempt to make that clear to Christians.

The eminent Rabi Louis Finkelstein, the head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America (often referred to as 'The Vatican of Judaism') in the Foreword to his First Edition of his classic The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith, on page XXI states:
"... Judaism... Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name... the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered...

From Palestine to Babylonia, from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered ...

... demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement..."

(Recall Moses Mendelssohn's words "Judaism is not a religion. Judaism is a law religionized".)

"Rabbi Louis Finkelstein in his great classic quoted from above, traces the origin of the form of religious worship practiced today under the present name 'Judaism', to its origin as 'Pharisaism' in Judea in the time of Jesus.
Rabbi Finkelstein confirms what Rabbi Adolph Moses says in his: Yahvism, and Other Discourses (in collaboration with Rabbi H.G. Enlow), published in 1903 by the Louisville Section of the Council of Jewish Women. Rabbi Adolph Moses, on page 1, states:
"Among the innumerable misfortunes which have befallen... the most fatal in its consequences is the name Judaism . . . worse still, the Jews themselves, who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism . . .

Yet, neither in biblical nor post-biblical, neither in talmudic, nor in much later times, is the term Judaism ever heard. . . To distinguish it from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish philosophers sometimes designate it as the faith or belief of the Jews. . .

It was Flavius Josephus, writing for the instruction of Greeks and Romans, who coined the term Judaism, in order to pit it against Hellenism...

The Christians eagerly seized upon the name...

The Jews themselves, who intensely detested the traitor Josephus, refrained from reading his works. Hence, the term Judaism coined by Josephus remained absolutely unknown to them. It was only in comparatively recent times, after the Jews became familiar with modern Christian literature, that they themselves began to name their religion Judaism"

This statement by the world's two leading authorities on this subject clearly establishes beyond any question or any doubt that 'Judaism' was not the name of any form of religious worship practised in Judea in the time of Jesus.

Religious worship known and practiced today under the name 'Judaism' by 'Jews' throughout the world was known and practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus under the name 'Pharisaism'... "

The form of religious worship known as 'Pharisaism' in Judea in the time of Jesus was based exclusively upon the Talmud. The Talmud today exercises virtual totalitarian dictatorship over the lives of Jews, whether they are aware of that fact or not. . . and Talmudic Law has been incorporated into U.S. and International law (more on that later). 

From The World's Troublemakers read carefully and consider the implications of the following paragraph from the Jewish Encyclopedia. Jews and Judeo-Christians alike, read each word as though it were highlighted, italicized, and underlined.

"This is the continuation of Phariseeism, as acknowledged in the Jewish Encyclopedia under the word 'Pharisee':
Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the teachings of the Pharisees.

The whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past.

Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thoughts of the Jew for all the future.

Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, in his book The Pharisee, confirms this and says:
"The spirit of the ancient Pharisee survived unaltered!"
On this basis, whenever the word 'Jew' is used we should remember that it refers to the Pharisees. This group believes now, as it did then, that it has been specially chosen by its own particular god to exercise dominion over all other groups, and that any means to this end has divine sanction."

From the Library of Congress' Dead Sea Scrolls website we find another assertion that modern Judaism IS Pharisaism; that is... Talmudism:

"... With the destruction of the Temple and the commonwealth in 70 C.E., all that came to an end. Only the Judaism of the Pharisees -- Rabbinic Judaism -- survived."

We Christians have been told that the Bible is the Word-of-God, every jot and tittle, both Old and New Testaments; not a word has been changed and according to the 'word' itself, dire consequences await any who doubt its veracity or who would dare attempt to change a jot or tittle. That's a slick way to keep the masses under control and scare hell out of any who would dare question.

The King James Version seems to be revered as 'the one and only' true written word of God. The two King James versions in our home are copyrighted. How would or could one 'copyright' the Word of God? According to copyright laws, when publishing work written by someone else at least twenty-percent of the material must be different from the original in order to secure a copyright. That 20% gives great leeway for additions, deletions and more subtle changes in a word here, a phrase there.

It has been written in several sources that Sir Francis Bacon was involved in the construction of the 'authorized' King James version of the Bible; that his biographer, William T. Smedley, wrote of the extent of Bacon's 'editing' as follows:

"It will eventually be proved that the whole structure of the Authorized Bible was Francis Bacon's. He was an ardent student not only of the Bible, but also of early manuscripts. St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and writers of theological works, were studied by him with industry."

The first five books of Christendom's Old Testament make up the Torah, which is the foundation of the Babylonian Talmud now comprised of sixty-three volumes. Then there is the extended Talmud which is oral - forbidden to be written - lest the heathen learn its secrets.

Those first five books of the so-called Christian Bible lay out a political program designed to create a World Government controlled by the same Ruling Sect that set the plan in motion before Jesus was born. From several sources we have read excerpts of Rabbi Rabinovich's speech given to a group of Rabbis from around the world in Budapest, in 1952, in which he makes clear the 'goal': (emphasis added)

"The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to increase our efforts and our caution tenfold.

I can safely promise you that before ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a slave.

We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born."

In response to questions regarding the pure authenticity of the Bible, Christian friends have often remarked: "God is all-powerful and would not allow His Word to be tampered with".

On the other hand, Christians have also declared that Lucifer controls the physical plane, this material third-dimensional world. Which way is it then?... because we can't have it both ways. Double mindedness is a form of insanity, and we must be insane in order to hold two absolutely opposing thoughts in our mind believing both to be truth.   

Douglas Reed, in his Controversy of Zion, sheds some light on the question of authenticity of the Old Testament. As an aside, his book title is taken from Isaiah 34. The dust jacket of the original publication bears a photocopy of the page from the Bible, beginning with verse 6:

The sword of the Lord is filled with blood, it is made fat with fatness, and with the blood of lambs and goats, with the fat of the kidneys of rams: for the Lord hath a sacrifice in Boz'rah, and a great slaughter in the land of Id-du-me'-a.

And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls, and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness For it is the day of the LORD'S vengeance, and the year of the recompenses for the controversy of Zion.

Slaughter, blood, destruction, blood, curses, vengeance and more bloody passages abound in the Old Testament. I wonder, where is the love? The 'Dr. Kastein' who Mr. Reed quotes throughout the book is introduced in the first chapter as:

"A most zealous Zionist historian, Dr. Josef Kastein . . . will often be quoted during this narrative because his book, like this one, covers the entire span of the controversy of Zion (save for the last twenty-two years; it was published in 1933).

Dr. Kastein, a fervent Zionist, holds that the Law laid down in the Old Testament must be fulfilled to the letter, but does not pretend to take the version of history seriously, on which this Law is based. In this he differs from Christian polemicists of the 'every word is true' school.

He holds that the Old Testament was in fact a political programme, drafted to meet the conditions of a time, and frequently revised to meet changing conditions."

In view of the fact that Dr. Kastein is a Zionist Jew, Reed's introduction is included here. There is a possibility, slim perhaps, that his work would be given credence by other Jews, and just maybe some Jews and Christians will take heed. Page 49 begins the chapter on:

THE TRANSLATION OF THE LAW

"The most important event (as it proved) of the next four hundred years was the first translation of the Judaic scriptures (later to become known as the Old Testament) into a foreign tongue, Greek. This enabled, and still enables, 'the heathen' to become partially acquainted with the Law that ordained their own enslavement and destruction and the supremacy of Judah.

Save for the translation the nature of literal Judaism would have remained a matter of surmise, whereas the translation made it appear to be one of evidence and proof.

For that reason it is at first sight surprising that the translation was ever made (as tradition says, by seventy-two Jewish scholars at Alexandria between 275 and 150 BC). Dr. Kastein explains that it was undertaken

"with a definite object in view, that of making it comprehensible to the Greeks; this led to the distortion and twisting of words, changes of meaning, and the frequent substitution of general terms and ideas for those that were purely local and national".

Dr. Kastein's words in this instance are carelessly chosen if they were intended to disguise what occurred; a matter is not made 'comprehensible' to others by distorting and twisting it, changing its meaning, and substituting ambiguous terms for precise ones. Moreover, so learned a Judaic scholar must have known what the Jewish Encyclopedia records, that the later Talmud even

"prohibited the teaching to a Gentile of the Torah, anyone so teaching 'deserving death'."

Indeed, the Talmud saw such danger in the acquirement by the heathen of knowledge of the Law that it set up the oral Torah as the last repository of Jehovah's secrets, safe from any Gentile eye.

If the Judaic scriptures were translated into Greek, then, this was not for the benefit of the Greeks (Dr. Kastein wrote for a largely Gentile audience). The reason, almost certainly, was that the Jews themselves needed the translation.

The Judahites had lost their Hebrew tongue in Babylon - thereafter it became a priestly mystery, "one of the secret spiritual bonds which held the Judaists of the Diaspora together", as Dr. Kastein says - and spoke Aramaic. However, the largest single body of Jews was in Alexandria, where Greek became their everyday language; many of them could no longer understand Hebrew and a Greek version of their Law was needed as a basis for the rabbinical interpretations of it.

Above all, the elders could not foresee that centuries later a new religion [Christianity] would arise in the world which would take over their scriptures as part of its own Bible [Old Testament], and thus bring "the Mosaic Law" before the eyes of all mankind. Had that been anticipated, the Greek translation might never have been made.

Nevertheless, the translators were evidently reminded by the priests that their work would bring "the Law" for the first time under Gentile scrutiny; hence the distortions, twistings, changes and substitutions mentioned by Dr. Kastein. An instance of these is apparently given by Deuteronomy 32:31, the translation which has come down to the heathen alludes vaguely to "a foolish nation", whereas the reference in the Hebrew original, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, is to "vile and vicious Gentiles".
What was translated? First, the five books of the Law, the Torah. After the 'New Covenant' had been forcibly imposed on the Jerusalemites by Ezra and Nehemiah, the priesthood in Babylon had given the Torah yet another revision;
"Once again anonymous editors lent their past history, their traditions, laws and customs a meaning entirely in keeping with theocracy and applicable to that system of government...

The form which the Torah then received was the final and conclusive form which was not to be altered by one iota; no single thought, word or letter of it was to be changed". [Dr. Kastein] 

When mortal men repeatedly "lend meaning" to something supposed already to be immutable, and force all spiritual tradition into the framework of their worldly political ambition, what remains cannot be an original revelation of God. What had happened was that the earlier, Israelite tradition had been expunged or cancelled, and in its place the Judaic racial law had assumed "final and conclusive form".
The same method was followed in the compilation of the other books, historical, prophetic or lyrical.

The book of Daniel, for instance, was completed at about this time, that is to say, some four hundred years after the events related in it; small wonder that the anonymous author got all his historical facts wrong. Dr. Kastein is candid about the manner in which these books were produced.

"The editors who put the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings into their final form gathered every fragment" (of the old teachings and traditions) "and creatively interpreted them...

It was impossible always definitely to assign particular words to a particular person, for they had so frequently worked anonymously, and, as the editors were more concerned with the subject matter than with philological exactitude, they were content with stringing the sayings of the prophets together as best they could".

(This method might account for the attribution of the identical "Messianic" prophecy to two prophets, Isaiah 2:2-4 and Micah 4:1-4, and for the numerous repetitions to be found in other books).
The subject matter then, was the important thing, not historical truth, or "philological exactitude", or the word of God.

The subject matter was political nationalism in the most extreme form ever known to man, and conformity with this dogma was the only rule that had to be observed. The way in which these books were compiled, after Judah was cast off by Israel - and the reasons - are clear to any who study their origin.

The resultant product, the growth of five or six hundred years and the work of generations of political priests, was the book which was translated into Greek around 150 BC. After the lifetime of Jesus, it, and the New Testament, was translated into Latin by Saint Jerome, when both
"came to be regarded by the Church as of equal divine authority and as sections of one book" (from a typical modern encyclopedia),

a theological dictum which was formally confirmed by the Council of Trent in the sixteenth century of our era and has been adopted by nearly all Protestant churches, although in this matter they might have found valid reason to protest.

In view of the changes which were made, at the translation, (see Dr. Kastein's words above), none but Judaist scholars could tell today how closely the Old Testament in the Hebrew-Aramaic original compares with the version which has come down, from the first translation into Greek, as one of the two sections of Christendom's Bible.

Clearly substantial changes were made, and quite apart from that there is the "oral Torah", and the Talmudic continuation of the Torah, so that the Gentile world has never known the whole truth of the Judaic Law.

Nevertheless, the essence of it is all in the Old Testament as it has come down to Christendom, and that is a surprising thing. Whatever may have been expunged or modified, the vengeful, tribal deity, the savage creed and the law of destruction and enslavement remain plain for all to ponder.

The fact is that no amount of twisting, distortion, changing or other subterfuge could conceal the nature of the Judaic Law, once it was translated; although glosses were made, the writing beneath remains clear, and this is the best evidence that, when the first translation was authorized, the universal audience it would ultimately reach was not foreseen.

With that translation the Old Testament, as we now call and know it, entered the West, its teaching of racial hatred and destruction only a little muted by the emendations. That was before the story of the West even had truly begun.

By the time the West and Christianity were nineteen and a half centuries old the political leaders there, being much in awe of the central sect of Judaism, had begun to speak with pious awe of the Old Testament, as if it were the better half of the Book by which they professed to live.

Nevertheless it was - as it always had been - the Law of their peoples' [Christians'] destruction and enslavement; and all their deeds, under the servitude which they accepted, led towards that end."

So much for the authenticity of the Old Testament as every-word-the-word-of-God, unless we are willing to elevate the Pharisees and the Scribes to the status of Creator.

As I re-read and ponder what has just been written, my thoughts turn to our reader who is beginning to see through the mist of lies, whether Jew, Christian or any one of the hundreds of other religious persuasions.  

I remember the shock and anger and hurt when I discovered that our Christmas -- the 'birthday' of Jesus -- was celebrated in ancient times as the Saturnalia, the Festival of Lights. It was a drunken orgy, during the Winter Solstice, and the priesthood turned it into a 'religious holiday' for Christians.

Some of you will read this, deny all the evidence and continue on as before. If your desire for truth is deep and strong and unrelenting, you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.

Those words of love and encouragement were meant for all of us - no religious doctrine or dogma or threats of hellfire and damnation. Just truth and love. They are one and the same. We can leave the lies behind us and keep what is real; Love is real. And we shall know the truth. . . 

The commentary about Biblical mythology is not a claim that the entire Old Testament is fiction. Throughout the ages, ancient truths have been hidden in plain sight, scattered among the lies; fiction is entwined with historical events. It is more likely that spiritual as well as historic truth lies hidden in religious and esoteric symbolism -- esoteric meanings for the adepts, exoteric for us, 'the profane'.

Take, for instance, the story of the exodus in the Old Testament. An important story. It is told that Jehovah ordered Moses to rescue the Israelites from their bondage in Egypt. Moses didn't think he could do that because he didn't have the verbal skills of persuasion. Jehovah was a bit miffed with Moses; however, he relented and said that Moses could take Aaron with him to be the spokesperson.

Jehovah said that Moses should tell the Pharoah to 'let my people go'; and then declared that he, Jehovah, was going to 'harden the Pharoah's heart' so the Pharoah would refuse. That way, Jehovah could prove his mighty power by bringing terrible plagues upon the people. All would suffer -- except his 'chosen' Israelites, of course. From Exodus 3:19,20 specifically, this is Jehovah to Moses:

"And I am sure that the king of Egypt will not let you go, no, not by a mighty hand. And I will stretch out my hand, and smite Egypt with all my wonders which I will do in the midst thereof; and after that he will let you go."

In Exodus 7:1,3,5

"And the Lord said unto Moses, See I have made thee a god to Pharoah; and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. . .

And I will harden Pharoah's heart, and multiply my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt.

And the Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord, when I stretch forth mine hand upon Egypt, and bring out the children of Israel from among them."

Jehovah is depicted, then, as a god who must prove himself by causing great pain and suffering on innocent people - the Egyptians - who had nothing to do with the Pharoah's enslavement of his chosen people.

Before they left, Jehovah instructed Moses to tell the 'chosen' to steal all they could carry from the Egyptians: Exodus 3: 21,22:

"And I will give this people favour in the sight of the Egyptians; and it shall come to pass that, when ye go, ye shall not go empty: But every woman shall borrow of her neighbour, and of her that sojourneth in her house, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold, and raiment; and ye shall put them upon your sons, and upon your daughters; and ye shalt spoil the Egyptians."

Could this be the reason why Jews - since 1948 and into the present - have no remorse for the eviction from their homes, along with the unconscionable, unspeakable and endless slaughter of the Palestinian Arabs, who have inhabited that 'promised' land for unknown generations? Jehovah must have changed his mind or exempted his chosen people about the 'killing' and 'stealing' prohibitions, etched in stone upon Mt. Sinai - the Mountain of The Lawgiving. 

As for all his 'wonders with which Jehovah smote Egypt'... they included:

The rivers ran with blood, the fish died and polluted the water so it stank and the Egyptians had no water to drink. Following were plagues of frogs that stank when they died, then lice, and finally flies. None of these bothered the chosen, living in the land of Goshen.

Next, the cattle all died, except for the herds of the chosen. After that, the land was covered with ashes that made boils break out on everybody, even the Pharoah's magicians - but not the chosen.

Then Jehovah sent thunder and hail mingled with fire that ran along the ground and on every living thing except in the land of Goshen, where the chosen lived. The flax and barley and herbs and fruit died. Whatever the hail didn't destroy, the next plague - of locusts - finished off the job.

After that, came three days of darkness, so dark one could feel it. All this time the Pharoah would have released the people, except that Jehovah kept hardening his heart:

"that thou may knowest that there is none like me in all the earth."  ". . . and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth." Exodus 9:14,15.

At last comes the grand finale. He sends a plague that kills the firstborn of all man and beast in Egypt, and the Pharoah, whose son was among the first born who died, let the people go. In Exodus 12: 29,30:

"And it came to pass, that at midnight the Lord smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharoah that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle. . . and there was a great cry in Egypt; for there was not a house where there was not one dead."

Except for the chosen. It appears -- like his acolytes who stop at nothing to accomplish their goals -- Jehovah would go to any length to prove that he was the greatest among the gods. The end always justifies the means.

This example was used to demonstrate how probable historic fact - a world cataclysm - was woven into a fantastic story for religious adherents, who seem to have swallowed it hook, line and sinker. And let's face it, this story in Exodus is the very foundation of two religions that have swept in probably half of the people on the face of this earth: namely Talmudism and Judeo-Christianity (once called just, Christianity).

Immanuel Velikovsky, in his book Worlds In Collision, gives an entire book's worth of credible ancient historic accounts worldwide, of the same type of catastrophes that plagued ancient Egypt at that time period. In other words, it was a world cataclysm, possibly a comet that had entered the solar system and came very close to the earth.

Unless he has made up every account cited, there is a vast amount of evidence to enforce Velikovsky's theory of a cataclysm that caused mountains to melt, new mountains to appear, huge walls of water in the seas (parting of the Red Sea) to literally cover the earth, as the oceans left their beds, plagues, death and destruction on a planetary scale from what his evidence leads him to believe was a comet.

Or could it have been the mysterious Planet X that is said to be nearing the earth in its 3600-year elliptical orbit? We'll leave that one alone for lack of time and space. Velikovsky blames the destruction on a comet based on many 'eye-witness' descriptions of a burning orb, not white but blood red, and the debris rained down on earth as it came close, explaining the rain that was fire, and the 'hail' that was hot.

This has been another learning experience for me, for in the past I have rejected the entire story of the exodus as the work of madmen. Velikovsky attempts to reconstruct the catastrophe from a large number of documents.

Some of his presentation should be given here so our reader can see alternative possibilities to the events outlined in the story of the exodus. About the 'rivers running red' he says:

"One of the first visible signs of this encounter (the comet) was the reddening of the earth's surface by a fine dust of rusty pigment. In sea, lake, and river this pigment gave a bloody colouring to the water. Because of these particles of ferruginous or other soluble pigment, the world turned red.

The Manuscript Quiche of the Mayas tells that in the Western Hemisphere, in the days of a great cataclysm, when the earth quaked and the sun's motion was interrupted, the water in the rivers turned to blood.

Ipuwer, the Egyptian eyewitness. . . wrote his lament on papyrus.

'The river is blood. Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere. . . Men shrink from tasting; human beings thirst after water.'

The Finnish epos of Kalevala describes how, in the days of the cosmic upheaval, the world was sprinkled with red milk.  The Altai Tartars tell of a catastrophe when 'blood turns the whole world red', and a world conflagration follows."

Velikovsky gives many accounts of the hail, rain of fire, etc. About the 'three days of darkness', the accounts make sense, in that in the earth's approach to the body of the comet, there was a disturbance in the rotation of the earth. During that time of darkness: where the darkness lasted for several days, on the other side of the earth are accounts of the sun 'standing still in the sky' and the daylight lasting for as many days.

He mentions the many mastodons that have been found frozen in the ice in northern Siberia, with undigested grass and leaves in their stomachs and between their teeth - plants that only grow in warmer climates - proving they had been frozen instantly by a drastic and sudden change in the temperature.

In one account the sledge-dogs ate the flesh unharmed. It was said that, 'The flesh is fibrous and marbled with fat' and 'looks as fresh as well frozen beef.' Not long ago many of us watched on tv news as one of these creatures was lifted whole out of the ice.

Most relevant, to the story of the exodus and the claim that the Israelites were set apart from the devastation, is that Velikovsky says:

"Numerous rabbinical sources describe the calamity of darkness; the material is collated as follows:
'An exceedingly strong wind endured seven days. All the time the land was shrouded in darkness. . . 'The darkness was of such a nature that it could not be dispelled by artificial means. The light of the fire was either extinguished by the violence of storm, or else it was made invisible and swallowed up in the density of the darkness. . . Nothing could be discerned. . . None was able to speak or to hear, nor could anyone venture to take food, but they laid themselves down. . . their outward senses in a trance. Thus they remained, overwhelmed by the affliction'.

The rabbinical tradition, contradicting the spirit of the Scriptural narrative, states that during the plague of darkness the vast majority of the Israelites perished and that only a small fraction of the original Israelite population of Egypt was spared to leave Egypt. Forty-nine out of every fifty Israelites are said to have perished in this plague.

Velikovsky cites as his source for the above rabbinical revelation: Targum Yerushalmi, Exodus 10:23; Mekhilta d'rabbi Simon ben Jokhai (1905), p. 38. Other sources are from: Josephus, Jewish Antiquities (transl. H. St. J. Thackeray, 1930), Bk, II, xiv.5.

"The vast majority of the Israelites perished. . . forty-nine out of every fifty. . . "

A few excerpts from an entire, heavily footnoted book, cannot do justice to the author's research. To repeat myself: Unless Velikovsky has fabricated all of his sources (which I doubt is the case) I am convinced that the story of Jehovah's 'wondrous workings' on the Egyptians, leaving the captive Israelites intact, is the fabrication, using an actual event in which to wrap the lie.

The Controversy of Zion is one of the most thorough and important books I've read for an overall view of history as it pertains to our present day circumstances. The author has a gift of speaking paragraphs in a sentence, so we have the benefit of reading many books in one.  

However, contrary to Mr. Reed's comment in the above chapter where he suggested that the Law may never have been translated into Greek had the elders anticipated that 'the world would take over their scriptures as part of its own Bible (Old Testament)'... contrary to that suggestion, it would appear that the program is moving along quite well as planned.

If the Old Testament books had not been written, or if they had not been made part of the Christian Bible, Christians today would not be promulgating Zionism (God's Kingdom on Earth), and then where would the plan for World Dominion be?

It was intended - in order that the plan would succeed - that the Jews should suffer throughout the ages in order to instill pity and guilt in all non-Jews, especially Christians; and to persuade monarchies and governments to open their doors to the poor oppressed Jews. (Their 'great power of the purse', as Theodor Herzl called it, was most instrumental of course in persuading monarchs as well as the decision makers in governments.)

The Jews then, along with a built-in sense of superiority - being the chosen - are born into their state of suffering. It is a mind set, part of their religious doctrine that they must suffer for their past 'sins', and be dispersed into foreign lands. Jehovah (through Moses) said so.

On the other hand, the Jews were commanded by Jehovah to destroy their 'captor hosts' during the dispersion, whether their host nation was hostile or friendly. We shall see in Part Two how they were used in that destructive process and why they were ejected from nearly every country in which they were dispersed.

The Ancient Priesthood laid it out and played it out perfectly so billions of people (Jews and Christians) would welcome the present evil, perversion, destruction and bloodshed as the harbinger of the New World Order, believing their messiah will appear.

It is pathetically ironic that the adherents of each religion and their particular denominations proudly believe they are the only ones who will benefit when that happens. They get to live on this earth for a thousand years with their messiah ruling in love and mercy and justice, while all unbelievers will burn  forever in the proverbial 'hell'. How un-loving, selfish and self-centered. How like the murdering and blood thirsty Jehovah.  

Christians who believe they are the only ones who will make it to Heaven and that all others will go to hell, would do well to heed the words of Jesus. Rather than gloating with pride in judging that others lesser than themselves are doomed to eternal, excruciating, hell-fire:

"Love your neighbor as yourself."

Christianity is a religion which teaches today that the Jewish/Talmudic Law is Divine. Religions were made by man to subdue and control the masses of humanity.

It becomes apparent - as the lies are exposed - that the religions were created to be destroyed. I believe the expectation of the priesthood is that when the lies are uncovered billions of Christians and Jews will throw the baby out with the bath water and embrace their 'King Despot of the Blood of Zion' that they are 'preparing for the world'.

It is hoped that as the lies are peeled away and the Spiritual consciousness of bewildered and betrayed masses awakens, they will 'see' and 'hear' and 'know' the simple truths given us by the one called Jesus.

If one takes time to study the teachings of other spiritual teachers, like Prince Sidhartha (the Buddha), Mohammed, Krishna, etc., the basic foundation of all is very similar to the simple truths given by Jesus, such as:

Love your God with all your mind, and heart and soul; love your neighbor as yourself. Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. As you sow, so shall you reap. By their fruits you shall know them. By your words you are justified and by your words you are condemned. With God, all things are possible. Nothing shall be impossible unto you. I and my Father are One; He is in me as I am in you. The kingdom of God is within you. You are the Light of world. The truth shall make you free.  

The word 'religion' comes from the Latin, 'ligio': to bind, to tie. The 're' means just that: to re-bind. It would be safe to say that the above mentioned maxims are not being taught in any of the respective religions today. Throughout history, the Priesthood has gained control of the students' minds, made a 'god' of the teacher, created a religion around that teacher while twisting, distorting and hiding the truth. In time the distortions became 'truth' to the religious adherents, binding them to the priests manipulations which cast the believers into the darkness of ignorance.

All religions have shreds of Truth running through them, and for the most part the Truth has been a closely held secret of adepts and initiates to the Mystery Schools. If, as Jesus said, the "Kingdom of God is within" us - and that his Kingdom "is not of this world"... why then do Christians so eagerly await the coming One World Government? 

Plato said that the 'elite' have always given the masses their religions, cultures and morals. Think about it... did Jesus say he was here to start a new religion? Actually, he is quoted in John 18:37 to Pilate:

"... To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice".

 

We are told that the Romans gave us the name 'Jesus.'  However, according to Dr. Israel Shahak, in his Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97-98, 118, we read:

"The Hebrew form of the name Jesus--Yeshu--was interpreted as an acronym for the curse, 'may his name and memory be wiped out,' which is used as an extreme form of abuse. In fact, anti-zionist Orthodox Jews (such as Neturey Qarta) sometimes refer to Herzl as 'Herzl Jesus' and I have found in religious zionist writings expressions such as "Nasser Jesus" and more recently 'Arafat Jesus." --Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97- 98, 118.

In the case of Jesus' real name, maybe the truth lies somewhere in between. When we wake up to the lies that were promulgated by the 'church' in order to re-gain control of the people under Roman rule; when we realize that the protesters who broke away from Catholicism brought the majority of the lies right into the new Protestant re-ligions along with the Old Testament; when we accept the fact that we were all born into a lie and truly begin to ask, seek and knock the truth will be revealed.

If our reader is offended by the reference to the second coming as a 'myth', I highly recommend Charlie Samples work, The Greatest Hoax. Christians who subscribe to the 'every word the word of God' axiom will find that, according to the scriptures, the apocalypse prophesied in Revelations, and talked about by Jesus took place - as Jesus foretold -in that generation.

If there is a 'coming apocalypse', as described by Velikovsky, and if peoples of ancient civilizations have left behind the accounts of such, it would be safe to assume that the priesthood had knowledge of that when the 'prophecies' were written into the 'Holy Books' of the various religions -- written by the same priesthood.

That same group who orchestrated Jesus death 2,000 years ago is the same group in power today. If he did return the 'mob' would no doubt be stirred up against the 'false prophet' - as he would probably be labeled - and cry out for his death. . . again.

That mob in the U.S. today demands the slaughter of innocent men, women and children in Afghanistan, or anywhere, to avenge the tragic deaths at the WTC allegedly masterminded by a man of whom it was said early on by U.S. Senator Oren Hatch:

"They've [FBI) come to the conclusion that this looks like it may be the signature of Osama bin Laden; that he may be the one behind this".

That's enough for Christians to justify wholesale murder in the name of God. It has become clear that the priesthood's uncanny understanding of human nature uses its knowledge to enslave our minds through the various religions they have given us. They have seduced the world's billions into believing that War is a 'Godly' deed.

In their arrogance the ultimate goal is to capture or imprison our souls. If the maxim is true that 'the mind is the gateway to the soul' we should all ponder that possibility seriously.

Although Christianity was created around the teachings of Jesus as told in the New Testament, the Old Testament does seem to take priority as 'the authority' for the majority of those who call themselves Christians. WHY?

Why do Christians quote so heavily from the Old Testament, skip over the Gospels - including the statements in red print which are presented as direct quotes by Jesus - and quote the allegedly reformed Pharisee, Saul/Paul as the authority?

And how is it that the O.T. is so heavily laden with all the 'begats' from the very beginning of time (the priesthood declared they knew the exact day and time that the world was created) and why is it we know so little about the life of Jesus, who was here only 2,000 years ago?

Think about it. The priestly records of bloodlines were said to have been destroyed in 70 AD when the temple was demolished, and yet in the Old Testament from those six-thousand years ago we are given a rundown on generations of 'begats', including the begotten in incest:

Abraham married his half-sister, which would make Sarah both the mother and aunt of Isaac; Moses' father married his aunt, thus Moses great aunt became his mother. Lot's daughters got pregnant by their father after they got him drunk, so they gave birth to their own brothers... or would that be half brother?

That scenario sounds like an echo of the escapades of the gods and goddesses as told in ancient mythology, doesn't it?

However, when it comes to the life of Jesus we know so little; his birth, the flight to Egypt to escape Herod's wrath, the day in the temple and then a few pages depicting his ministry.

What gives? What did Jesus do while in Egypt? What did he discover? And what did he do during those years before he began his ministry? Are we to believe there are no records to shed light on this mystery? In the last verse of John it was stated,

"And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen"

So, where is it? Why do we know so little about what happened during the time of Jesus' birth, his growing up years, and the 'many other things which Jesus did'? This was recently explained away by a very dear friend: 'it says in the Bible we were given enough to understand'. When asked if what we had been given was enough for her, she said simply and finally, 'yes'.

My question has always been: Why have we been given so little and why do Christians not question, when Jesus himself told us to ask, seek and knock?

Seek ye the truth and the truth shall make you free.

It has been written from many sources that the Catholic church archives holds (and hides) thousands of documents written by the ancients. The Dead Sea Scrolls remained hidden from all but seven theological scholars for over half a century after their discovery. What changes, additions and deletions were made before they were released to the public little piece by pieces?

And what power exists that claims the right to control this critical historical information, considered sacred by many? From several and varied sources we have read that the Vatican, the Rockefeller Institute and Israel, in their turns, have had possession of the Scrolls, held secret from the hundreds of millions of people who hunger and thirst for Truth -- this researcher/seeker/ writer being one of those.

Maybe the answer lies in a Time Magazine article we recently discovered, of January 14, 1991, titled, Ouster of an Anti-Judaist.

It seems the Dead Sea Scrolls are housed in the Palestinian Archeological Museum (also known as the Rockefeller Institute). A Harvard Professor, John Strugnell, who had held the position of chief editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls for several years was fired because of an interview with the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, in which he purportedly called himself an Anti-Judaist, and declared that

"Judaism is a 'horrible' religion with 'racist' origins that in principle should not exist at all."

It might be presumed that after several years work on the Scrolls he would be in a position to know. Strugnell, who denies being anti-Semitic also asserted that:

"The correct answer of Jews to Christianity is to become Christian." 

In today's Orwellian, Judeo-Christian world, that would certainly be akin to jumping out the frying pan and into the fire. Did you notice the position Mr. Strugnell held? Chief Editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls. An editor edits! According to the 1974 Merriam-Webster dictionary, 'edit' is a verb meaning 'to revise and prepare for publication'. 

It is worth repeating that the first five books of the Old Testament in the Christian Bible make up the Torah, which is the foundation of the Babylonian Talmud - the holy book of the Jews.

Those first five books of the Christian Bible lay out the political program for World Dominion, to be governed by the same Ruling Sect that set the plan in motion before Jesus was born, and to be governed solely by Talmudic Law. Rabbi Rabinovich's statement that:

"The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach..."

is referring to the same political program and the same Ruling Sect of which Jesus spoke 2,000 years ago when he opposed the laws made by men rather than Creator and when he told the Pharisees "...Ye are of your father the devil".

Jehovah, the tribal deity presented to the people 3,000 years ago by the itinerate priests, was the 'devil' of which Jesus spoke. To put it another way: According to the Old Testament, the Levitical priests were Pharisees. The Pharisees were the priests of the god, Jehovah. Who, then, would be their 'father', if not Jehovah?

According to the Old Testament, Jehovah himself says he is 'a' god. From Exodus 6:2,3,7

"And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD: And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JE-HO'VAH was I not known to them...

And I will take you to be for a people, and I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God..."

Does that sound like a statement that would be made by the One Creator of all that exists? "I will be to you a God"? What possibly could this mean? That Jehovah is not the God of which Jesus spoke? Our Father in Heaven, who loves us? In Exodus 15:11 we find an interesting inquiry of the Israelites asking Jehovah,

"Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the Gods?"

'Among the Gods', would seem to imply multiple gods, Jehovah being one of the many. Solomon in II Ch. 6:14 praises Jehovah, saying:

"O, LORD God of Israel, there is no God like thee in the heaven, nor in the earth..." 

If Jehovah is the One God/Creator, why do his priests and his chosen people keep comparing him with other gods? Jesus is also quoted, in John, to the Pharisees:

"If God were your Father, ye would love me; for I proceedeth forth and came from God; ... Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar and the father of it."

It would be interesting to discover if Jesus actually used the word 'God', or was his word for Creator mis-translated to once again cause the confusion? It makes it difficult for Christians who have fed from the Pharisaic trough for so long to differentiate the two in their minds; especially difficult in the face of constant admonishments by religious leaders and the Bible itself to not question, yet Jesus told us to ask and seek and knock.

To confirm the statements of the Rabbis, above, regarding the 'religion of the Jews', in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, page 474 we read:

 "The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature"

A guest on the Sweet Liberty broadcast informed us that Jupiter/Jove/Jehovah were one and the same. A search on the internet (using 'Jove' and 'Jehovah') brought astounding results. (All emphasis in these excerpts are added)

The first item on the list was: A Masonic Song - 'A performance of this song in New York City was reported in Gaine's Mercury, July 2, 1781':

[verse 1] "By sacred influence hurl'd, From chaos rose the world, Great will of Jove. Grand architect supreme, Fountains of wisdom stream, Receive our humble theme, Duty and love.

[verse 3] Jehovah we implore Peace to his realms restore . . ."

It was stated that this song was sung to the tune of 'God Save the King', which is the exact tune to which Americans sing 'My country tis of thee; sweet land of liberty...' Oh, my... have we been duped!

Another reference to Jove/Jehovah was titled '666 in Ancient Religions'. The explanation of a group of symbols, signs, and codes stated in part:

"...The Hebrew-Chaldee JHVH (Jehovah forming the crossbar of the H could also be translated JOVE, a minced form of Jehovah and a name of the sun-god Jupiter."

Here are the first two verses of The Universal Prayer, by Alexander Pope, once again using Jove and Jehovah as the same:

"FATHER of all! In every age, In every clime adored, By saint, by savage and by sage, Jehovah, Jove, or Lord!

Thou great First Cause, least understood, Who all my sense confined To know but this, that thou art good, and that myself am blind . . . "

Other information from several varied sources discovered in the search for Jehovah/ Jove/Jupiter and Minerva is excerpted below:

'According to an ancient legend, the first man was made by Zeus. His breastplate was the aegis, his bird was the eagle. In Zeus' honour, the Olympic games are held every four years.

... essentially the same 'inflation' of the leading god happened with Greek and Roman religion: Greek Zeus and Latin Jupiter or Jove.

Dzeus or Deus Pater... in Latin Deus Pater meaning 'God, the Father'.

At the end of, and especially after, the much later 'Babylonian Exile' of the Jews, the Jews. . . inflated a local god of the Palestinian soil, Yahweh, into a Jew-choosing divinity.'

Zeus was the name the Greeks gave the Lord of the World. The same god in Rome was Jupiter or Jove. Jove-Jehovah's symbol was the EAGLE. Is it not interesting that the symbol for the U.S. is the eagle?... and Bush dubbed the neverendingwar on terrorism Operation Noble Eagle - ONE - from the United Nations' slogan "Out of the many - one". In Latin it is : "e pluribus unim", which slogan we find on the 'dollar' bill of the Federal Reserve Bank.

"The Jews have long written the vowel-less Tetragrammaton YHWH (for YaHWeH) with the added Masoretic points of the Hebrew-Phoenician word which they actually pronounced Adonai, meaning 'Lord' which gave rise to the name 'Jehovah'."

"Thus, what was originally a transpersonal universal intelligence underlying and constituting all existence became a very personal Middle Eastern despot who paradoxically also loves you. It was the alpha-male/father raised to infinite magnitude."

" With the goddesses Juno and Minerva, Jupiter formed the triad whose worship was the central cult of the Roman state."

"In the council of the gods that followed the overthrow of his father Saturn, Jupiter (Jove) was crowned Sovereign Lord of all the World and of all the gods."

Jupiter formed the triad - trinity?

Jupiter/Jove had overthrown his father because he felt Saturn to be inadequate to the work - Lucifer?

Jupiter/Jove was crowned Sovereign Lord of all the World, and of all the gods - Jehovah? And the people asked of Jehovah:

"Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the Gods?"

It is fitting here to repeat earlier excerpts from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

"When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned it is these same hands [the mob] which will sweep away everything that might be a hindrance thereto."  Protocol No. 3.

"Ever since that time [French Revolution] we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favour of that King Despot of the blood of Zion, whom we are preparing for the world." Protocol No. 3.

"However, it is probably all the same to the world who is its sovereign lord, whether the head of Catholicism or our despot of the blood of Zion." Protocol No.4.

How would Christians accept the fact - if they realized it - that their churches are teaching Babylonian Talmudism? It is true. The Jewish religion is not Judaism; there is no such religion as Judaism. The Jewish religion is Talmudism, and as it is today, it traces its descent without a break through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Judaism is not a religion, it is a Law, religionized. Wouldn't it be a more accurate term then, rather than Judeo-Christian to call it like it is: Talmudic-Christian?

Those of you who embrace Talmudism and have not studied the great works of the Talmudists might wish to verify the authenticity of claims made by researchers that it does contain the racist (and dangerous) pronouncements asserted by Mr. Strugnell, former editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and many others. That would suppose you have an unabridged version. Rather than deny the claims, do your own research.

According to Benjamin Freedman, the official translation of the Talmud into English was printed in London by the Soncino Press in 1935 in a very limited amount, although thorough researchers say that a few very damning statement have either been omitted or changed. From what we gather, there is enough left intact to make the case.

A small book titled The Talmud Unmasked, by Father I.B. Pranaitis, would be a fruitful place to begin as it will narrow the search for specific passages; however, his book focuses on the Talmudic view of the Goi, and Christians specifically. He does not address the Talmudic fascination with sex and sexual perversions. We will address that in the next section, with quotes from the Talmud.

For Christians who are interested in reading the book and would not have access to the full sixty-three volumes to authenticate the information: some time ago, I had a discussion with a Zionist Jew who has attested to the authenticity of Fr. Pranaitis' quoted excerpts from the Talmud, although he denies that all the books cited are part of the Talmud.

Incidentally, this avowed Zionist Jew just mentioned, maintains that 'a Zionist Jew is merely one who loves his homeland'. He lives in America and makes his living here, and yet his beloved homeland is Israel.

When asked how he felt about the inflated percentage of Jews in Clinton's cabinet (over 50%), given that the percentage of Jews in our population is allegedly only 3%, his response was that 'It makes us proud when one of our own does good'.

If his sense of pride in any Jew who 'does good' -- no matter what evil is committed to attain the position, power or notoriety -- is representative of the average Jew in America, there is a grave conflict of interest here. Most importantly, what they don't seem to realize is that -- as the 'lesser brethren' -- they, too, will become victims of those of theirs who 'do good'. To join the ranks of those who 'did good' would require payment of one's soul in return.

When a Christian American gains political power, and commits acts of treason against his fellow Americans, that person is not held with pride, nor celebrated by other Christian Americans. Why, then, would an American Jew express pride in a fellow Jew's achievements under the same conditions?

Having admitted he hadn't read much of the Talmud, I suggested the Zionist Jew get Father Pranaitis' book on the subject, that allegedly quotes the Talmud word-for-word and sites the sources. Having read it, I was anxious to learn if it was in fact an accurate depiction of the Talmudic writings.

Later we had a conversation by e-mail. An excerpt of the e-mail is pasted below to demonstrate the mental gymnastics... the lengths to which one will go when he is fully entrenched in religious dogma. There is little difference between Jews (in this sense) and Christians in defense of their particular denomination of 'Christianity'. . . except that Christians are not taught to hate Jews, nor avoid them, nor intentionally deceive and cheat them.

J.P.: Have you checked out your Talmud in reference to the Talmud Unmasked? You say you read the book but haven't said you've checked it out and found it to be untrue.
Response: About 80% of the quotes in the "Talmud Unmasked" are from books that, while important Jewish books, are not actually the Talmud which is made up only of the "Mishnah" and the "Gomorrah." I know this because Pranaitis does an excellent job of documenting his sources in the appendix.

Although he confirms quotations from what he claims are books not part of the Talmud, he omitted refering to the other 'twenty-percent' that he evidently accepts as being from the Talmud. That hadn't occurred to me until now. While he verifies the authenticity of Fr. Pranaitis' information, he claims that only the Mishnah and the Gomorrah make up the Talmud. That would omit the Torah, the Sanhedrin, the Midrash, and a few dozen other volumes included in the sixty-three volume set of books referred to as the "Talmud".

Rabbi Jacob Neusner explains it otherwise, in his Rabbinic Judaism. While not citing specific books, he expounds on the depth and breadth of the Talmud.

"That sustained, systematic exposition, through one instance after another, of the right reading of the Torah in both its media comes to Israel [Jews] now as in the past in a single document, The Talmud of Babylonia.
That statement of fact describes the centrality of Talmud in the future curriculum of the Judaic intellect, the priority of the Talmud from the time of its closure in about 600 C.E. to the present time.
For 'Judaism' is Rabbinic Judaism, and the Talmud of Babylonia is the authoritative statement of the Torah that Judaism embodies.

The Talmud is the prism, receiving, refracting all light.

To state the proposition in academic language: into that writing all prior canonical writings emerged; to it, all appeal is directed; upon it, all conclusions ultimately rest. In the language of Torah itself: study of the Torah begins, as a matter of simple, ubiquitous fact, in the Talmud . . .

In all times, places, and writings, other than those rejected as heretical, from then to now, the Talmud formed the starting point and the ending point, the alpha and the omega of truth; . . .
In reading the written Torah itself, the Talmud's exegesis enjoys priority of place. Scripture rightly read reaches Israel in the Talmud (and related writings of Midrash); sound exegesis conforms to the facts of the Talmud. . .
In all decisions of law that express theology in everyday action, the Talmud forms the final statement of the torah, mediating Scripture's rules. Innovation of every kind, whether in the character of the spiritual life or in the practice of the faith in accord with its norms, must find justification in the Talmud. "(p.205)
"That is the power of this Judaism, which for as long time, and for the majority of practitioners of Rabbinic Judaism today, defines the normative, the classical, the authentic Torah: Rabbinic Judaism.

That formulation of the theology of Rabbinic Judaism, which is to say, of the Torah, therefore constitutes the Talmud's representation of the Torah. . . to know the Torah, we have to think in the way in which Torah teaches us to think. No prior document spells out that way, in massive, tedious, repetitive detail, case by case by case, as does the Talmud of Babylonia." (p209)

Those excerpts were taken from Judaism's Strange Gods, by Michael A. Hoffman II. Let us now read a brief sampling of the books of the Talmud, from Fr. Pranaitis' book, which authenticity has been verified by a Zionist Jew. We will begin with Fr. Pranaitis' explanation of the various terms used for Goi (non-Jews), specifically Christians: (Brackets and parentheses are part of the original transcript. Emphasis added is in bold font.)

"As in our languages Christians take their name from Christ, so in the language of the Talmud Christians are called Notsrim, from Jesus the Nazarene. But Christians are also called by the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-Jews:
Abhodah Zarah -- strange worship, idolatry;

Akum -- made up of the initial letters of the words Obhde Kokhabkim U Mazzaloth - worshippers of stars and planets;

Obhde Elilim -- servers of idols;

Minim -- heretics;

Nokhrim -- strangers, foreigners;

Edom -- Edomites 'they are called Edomites who move their fingers 'here and here' (making the sign of the cross);

Amme Haarets -- people of the earth, idiots;

Goi -- Race, or people; a gentile; they call a gentile woman a Goiah. It is mostly applied to non-Jews or idolaters. In Jewish books which treat of Idolatry, worshippers of idols are often called by this single world Goi. For this reason, in more recent editions of the Talmud the use of the word Goi is purposely avoided and other words for non-Jews are substituted;

Apikorosim -- Epicureans. All are called by this name who do not observe God's precepts, as well as all those, even Jews themselves, who express private judgments in matters of faith. How much more, therefore "Christians";

Kuthrim -- Samaritans. But since there are no longer any Samaritans, and since there are many references in recent Jewish books to Samaritans, who can doubt that this does not mean the Christians?

Christians are unclean. The following is given in Biur Hetib, a commentary on the Schulchan Arukh:
"A woman must wash herself again if she sees any unclean thing, such as a dog, an ass, or People of the Earth; a Christian (Akum) a camel, a pig, a horse, and a leper."
In Abhodah Zarah, (22b):
"Why are the Goyim unclean? Because they were not present at Mount Sinai. For when the serpent entered into Eve he infused her with uncleanness. But the Jews were cleansed from this when they stood on Mount Sinai; the Goyim, however, who were not on Mount Sinai were not cleansed."

By their own admission, at least 95% of the Jews today are of Khazarian ancestry. It is doubtful that the descendants of today's Jews 'were present at Mount Sinai'. Not only is the religion itself a creation of the Pharisees and Rabbis, it appears the people of the religion are nearly non-existent. What comes to mind is the statement of Moses Mendelssohn, that Judaism is not a religion, it is a law religionized. Back to Father Pranaitis:

Not like men, but beasts. In Kerithuth (6b p.78) it says:
"The teaching of the Rabbis is: He who pours oil over a Goi, and over dead bodies is freed from punishment. This is true for an animal because it is not a man. But how can it be said that by pouring oil over a Goi one is freed from punishment, since a Goi is also a man? But this is not true, for it is written: Ye are my flock, the flock of my pasture are men. (Ezechiel, XXXIV, 31) You are thus called men, but the Goyim are not called men."
They differ only in form from beasts. Midrasch Talpioth (fol. 225d):
"God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel. But Akum were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved from this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him."
Rabbi Edels, in commenting on Kethuboth (110b) says:
"The Psalmist compares the Akum to the unclean beast in the woods."
Worse Than Animals. Rabbi Schelomo Iarchi (Raschi), famous Jewish commentator, explaining the law of Moses (Deuter. XIV, 21) forbidding the eating of meat of wounded animals, but which must be given to the ‘stranger in thy gates,’ or which, according to Exodus (XXII, 30) is to be thrown to the dogs, has this to say:
".... for he is like a dog. Are we to take the word ‘dog’ here literally? By no means. For the text in speaking of dead bodies says, Or thou mayest sell it to an alien. This applies much more to the meat of wounded animals, for which it is permitted to accept payment. Why therefore does the Scripture say it may be thrown to ‘dogs’? In order to teach you that a dog is to be more respected than the Nokhri."
They propagate like beasts. Sanhedrin (74b) Tosephoth:
"The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like to that of a beast."

Kethuboth (3b):

"The seed of a Goi is worth the same as that of a beast."
Zohar (II, 64b): Rabbi Abba says:
"If only idolaters alone had sexual intercourse, the world would not continue to exist. Hence we are taught that a Jew should not give way to those infamous robbers. For if these propagate in greater number, it will be impossible for us to continue to exist because of them. For they give birth to sucklings the same as dogs."

Although the first five books of the Christian Bible, (O.T.) is the foundation of the Talmud, and lovingly embraced by Christians, here's what the Talmud says of the Gospels:

"Minim -- Heretics. In the Talmud those who possess books called the Gospels are heretics. 'Siphre Debeth Abidan', Books of the House of Perdition. The Talmud in particular speaks of the books of the Gospels. Thus in Schabbath (116a) it says:
"Rabbi Meir calls heretical books 'Aven Gilaion', (volumes of iniquity) because they call them Gospels."
A Jew is forbidden not only to enter a Christian church, but even to go near it, except under certain circumstances. In Iore Dea (142,10) it says:
"It is forbidden to stand in the shadow of a house of idolatry, whether from the inside or the outside, for a distance of four cubits from the front door...
Christians are to be avoided because they are Idolaters. Lest a Jew be the occasion, of sin to the idolatrous Christians . . . In Abhodah Zarah (2a) it says:
"For three days before their idolatrous festivals it is not permitted to buy or sell them anything. It is also forbidden to give or take any help from them, to change any money with them, to pay them back any debts or allow them to pay back debts."
In the Abhodah Zarah, (78c - the Perusch of Maimonides, fol. it says:
"All the festivals of the followers of Jesus are forbidden, and we must conduct ourselves towards them as we would towards idolaters."
Mention is also made of many other things which it is forbidden to sell to Christians, such as: cloth from which priestly vestments and banners may be made; paper and ink which may be used for writing books pertaining to their divine worship. Nowadays, however, Jews trade with Christians, especially on Christian feast days. . . The Talmud can give no reason for this, and in the Abhodah Zarah (2a, Toseph) it says:
"It is difficult to say by what right Jews nowadays trade with the Goyim on their feast days. . . yet every week they celebrate the Day of the Nazarene which has always been forbidden to us."
Bartenora, however, in his commentary on Abhodah Zarah (1,2, fol. 7b) says:
"Since, while we are in captivity we cannot live without trading with them, and we depend upon them for our food and we must fear them, it is only forbidden to trade with them on their feast days. Furthermore, it is permitted nowadays to trade with them even on the actual day of their feasts, because the Rabbis are convinced that they do not worship their idols just because they trade with us. And what is forbidden in this book must be taken as applying directly to idolatry."
A Jew must not go before a Christian Judge. In Choschen Hammischpat (26,1) it says:
"A Jew is not permitted to bring his case before Akum judges, even if the matter is judged by the decisions of Jewish [Talmudic] law, and even if both parties agree to abide by such decisions. He who does so is impious and similar to one who calumniates and blasphemes, and who raises his hand against the Law given us by Moses, our great law-giver."
Since the Goyim minister to Jews like beasts of burden, they belong to a Jew together with his life and all his faculties. From A. Rohl. Die Polem. p.20:
"The life of a Goi and all his physical powers belong to a Jew."
A Jew must always try to deceive Christians. In Zohar (1, 160a) it says:
"Rabbi Jehuda said to him [Rabbi Chezkia]: 'He is to be praised who is able to free himself from the enemies of Israel, and the just are much to be praised who get free from them and fight against them'.

Rabbi Chezkia asked, 'How must we fight against them?'

Rabbi Jehuda said, 'By wise counsel thou shalt war against them' (Proverbs: 24; 6).

By what kind of war? The kind of war that every son of man must fight against his enemies, which Jacob used against Esau -- by deceit and trickery whenever possible. They must be fought against without ceasing, until proper order be restored. Thus it is with satisfaction that I say we should free ourselves from them and rule over them."

In Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth) it says:
"Even the best of the Goyim should be killed."
The Schulchan Arukh, after the words of Iore Dea (158,1), that those of the Akum who do no harm to Jews are not to be killed, namely those who do not wage war against Israel, thus explains the word Milchamah -- war.
"But in time of war the Akum are to be killed, for it is written: The good among the Akum deserve to be killed, etc.' "

Another book that quotes extensively from the Talmud is, ISRAEL - Our Duty - Our Dilemma. The author of this book, Theodore Winston Pike, appears to be a Judeo-Christian.

While he vehemently opposes Zionism, he embraces Judaism of the Bible, quotes heavily from the Talmud, and attempts to separate the two. There is no separation. There can be no separation, because Judaism of the Bible - the first five books of the Old Testament - are the Talmud exemplified. More than that, they are the very foundation of the Talmud, being the Torah.

After spending a few hours reading parts of the book that had earlier been skipped over (from frustration at the mixed message), it was apparent the book contains valuable information. Maybe it is that half-way house between sleeping and awakening.

The author gives his readers a clear picture of the evils of the Zionist plan for World Dominion, reinforcing much of what we have written here. To make his point, he quotes heavily from the Talmud, Kabalah, and Jewish Encyclopedias. He factually portrays the dangers of a planned world takeover by the Zionists, and the perversion and destruction that has resulted from Israel's power today - especially their hold over the U.S. government.

This is all steeped in Old Testament and Pauline scripture, and through it all he maintains that "for the present, while on the international level America must respect diplomatic and geopolitical realities concerning the state of Israel" . He believes that America must, because it's written in the Old Testament.

In addition he says that 'Christians must remain alive to the humanitarian and spiritual needs of Jews', however, the duty does not include active support of the Antichrist system in the Middle East.

He mentions the O.T. prophecies that claimed one day a holy remnant will be led back to Palestine by God, and all Jewry would live there as evangelists to the nations and "servants of the King of Zion".

Mr. Pike has evidently not read the Protocols, that boast of their 'King Despot of the Blood of Zion' that they're preparing for the world. He obviously believes the King of Zion will be Jesus, who said clearly that his kingdom is not of this world.

Admitting that most of the inhabitants of Israel today are not descendants from either Abraham or that 'Holy Land' which they occupy, but are instead of the Khazarian ancestry, he insists that:

"God's spiritual covenant with the ancient patriarchs is still alive in spirit -- still as binding as when God first told Abraham that He would one day save His children."

That is the insanity - double-mindedness - that exists where religious indoctrination takes over. Even though Israel today is evil, we must support it because it was mandated by 'God'. The 'God' that made that covenant with Abraham was Jehovah, the tribal deity fabricated by the Pharisees.

This type of confusion is a result of the mental programming of religious training. It is unfortunate, because if it weren't for the completely scrambled message, Pike's book could have been a wake-up call for many Judeo-Christians, and possibly the Jews themselves.

While reading the quotes from the Talmud relevant to sex and sexual perversion, thoughts of the perversion being promulgated in America today - too many examples to relate in detail here - flooded my mind. It is everywhere: on television programs that youngsters watch, HBO presentations so ghastly that five seconds of viewing leaves one wondering what planet he is on, movies, books, videos, stage plays, and even in what is called 'the arts' today.

Parents who closely monitor their children's entertainment in an effort to protect their innocent and very open minds, and whose children are still in the government indoctrination centers are sending them into the arms of the purveyors of perversion.  

Schools are teaching that homosexuality is a normal, natural way to be, and opening their minds to perversions such as bestiality, 'fisting', etc. In Massachusetts special sessions were presented by homosexuals inducing the children from ages twelve to sixteen to 'try it; you might like it'.

As reported in the Washington Times, at a recent United Nations Child Summit, a UNICEF-funded book was given to delegates from Latin America encouraging children to engage in sexual activities with other minors, homosexuals and animals. The book, which was distributed by the Mexican government with U.N. funding, suggests lesbian sex as an acceptable alternative for girls as a way to avoid pregnancy. A brief excerpt of the book says it best:

"Sexual relations with a partner: Here we should insist there is no ideal or perfect relations between two or several people. . . . the one that gives us the most satisfaction and that which is adopted to our way of being and the style of life we have chosen. This is why we encounter many differences among women. Some women like to have relations with men. And others with another woman."

An accompanying workshop book produced by the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) tells Latin American mothers and teens:

"Situations in which you can obtain sexual pleasure: 1) Masturbation. 2) Sexual relations with a partner - whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. 3) A sexual response that is directed toward inanimate objects, animals, minors, non-consenting persons."

If sex with a non-consenting person isn't rape, all the dictionaries must be rewritten. In fact, they are being rewritten slowly and surely year by year. The Webster's 21st Century 'for school, home and office', 1993 edition has omitted the word 'pederasty', which - for our reader who may be as naive as I in having to look up the definition - means, "practicing anal intercourse, especially with a boy". It was found in a 1960's edition.

If the content of this section seems too 'sensitive' a subject for our reader, know that our once-innocent children are being bombarded with this same type of 'content' wherever they turn, and is acceptable by Talmudic standards, along with bestiality.

Now, having read that, when you read the quotations on sex and sexual perversion from the Talmud, bear in mind that the United Nations was first called the League of Nations, and recall the boast from Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow, at the Carlsbad Congress on 8-24-1922 that:

"The League of Nations is a Jewish idea. We created it after a fight of 25 years".

We will end this section with a relevant excerpt from Protocol No.9:

"In order not to annihilate the institutions of the goyim before it is time we have touched them with craft and delicacy, and have taken hold of the ends of the springs which move their mechanism. These springs lay in a strict but just sense of order; we have replaced them by the chaotic license of liberalism.

We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the corner-stones of a free existence.

We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated."

With that said, we will begin quoting from the Talmud on sex and sexual perversion that will allow us a look into the future, at the world in the New World Order, IF the Zionists succeed in their plan. Sadly, it really isn't 'into the future', for we are experiencing it now. Before you move on, you might want to read the Protocols one more time. It was all laid out very clearly a hundred years ago, wasn't it?

As we have read some of the excerpts from the Talmud we see that its writers - the revered Rabbis - express their loathing for all goyim (or goyim), many times and in many ways. It appears to be Christians who have earned their special attention.

We have discovered that, according to the Talmudic teachings: Goyim are not men but beasts; even the best of the Goyim should be killed; they are unclean idolaters deserving of death; and the Jews are to rule over the world served by the Goyim.

Nonreligious Jews might scoff at the suggestion that these Talmudic Halaka (laws) are in effect today. If it is the same priesthood in control today that control the reins of governments, that control the economy in every nation, that made the laws those many centuries ago, the few Jews who don't believe the Talmudic laws are in effect today count for little.

Nonreligious Jews probably have less influence in the scheme of things than Judeo or Zionist Christians -- as they have taken to calling themselves. The Jews are pawns in the game of the priesthood that has pulled the wool over the eyes of their 'lesser brethren' from the start, through the centuries 'without a break' to the present situation, where we are on the verge of their planned world conflagration.

We are told that the world population of Jews is a fraction of that of Christians, which may be true. However, Jewish population figures are questionable in that the Rabbis object to their people being counted in the census of their 'captive' nation. The fact remains that all their 'terrible power of the purse' could not bring about this world conflagration without the evangelical 'Christian' ministers inducing their insipid flocks of sheep - tens of millions combined in the various denominations - to embrace Israel with all their hearts and to justify whatever Israel does, no matter how many people are massacred in the process, believing it is the fulfillment of a divine covenant.

The Christian Zionists who believe that the millions who will suffer and die in an imminent Third World War is God's plan, and that in the 'end' Jesus will be seated on the throne in Jerusalem... those same Christians also believe that God chose the Jews to be his 'special people'; and ironically they believe that in the end, if the 'chosen ones' do not accept Jesus as the Sovereign Lord of All The World, that very same God will cast his 'chosen' into hell.

On the other hand, the Jews believe that the King will be their messiah - a bloody warlord - come to rescue them from their captivity and gather them all together in their promised land from where they will be waited upon by the goyim who are left alive only for that purpose.

The Elders refer to the long awaited messiah as their 'King Despot of the Blood of Zion', who they are preparing for the world. They give credit for the successful culmination of this event to the 'blind and savage mob' -- that they helped to make blind and savage. To repeat (as a reminder) the exact statement from Protocol No. 3:

"By want and the envy and hatred which it [hunger] engenders we shall move the mobs and with their hands we shall wipe out all those who hinder us on our way.

When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned it is these same hands which will sweep away everything that might be a hindrance thereto."

As for the goyim, the Elders continue their commentary in Protocol No. 3:

"The goyim have lost the habit of thinking unless prompted by the suggestions of our specialists . . . ".

It would be safe to include among their 'specialists' the various and seemingly countless church leaders who keep their flocks in a state of dazed religious fervor, crying out and praying for the 'end'.

Little do the Christian Zionists know that if their wish is granted and Israel becomes the seat of power in the World Government, it could mean the end of them under the Noachide Laws. Of Talmudic origin, the Noachide laws apply only to gentiles. The punishment for breaking a Noachide Law is execution by decapitation. One of the laws prohibits 'idolatry'. Under Talmudic law, all Christians are considered 'idolaters'... remember? We will address the Noachide Laws in more detail later. Our reader should take this seriously, because the ruling priesthood is dead serious.

Do you suppose the King Despot will reveal his evil? He will undoubtedly be presented as a 'savior'; he will love all people; he will express sympathy and empathy at the plight of the world's hungry and homeless masses; he will offer peace and comfort and safety, shelter from the storm; he will spread his ''loving' arms wide beckoning the suffering to come unto him. Many will. . . and the trap will be sprung.

Let us now continue with quoting from the Talmud. Here are a few more random quotes that had not been included in the last section.

Sanhedrin (57a). When a Jew murders a gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

Baba Kamma (37b) The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."

Yebamoth (98a) All gentile children are animals.

Abhodah Zarah (36b) Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

Abhodah Zarah (22a-22b) Gentiles prefer sex with cows.

Gittin (70a) The Rabbis taught: "On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a man should not have sexual intercourse till he has waited long enough to walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him for that time; if he does, his children will be epileptic."

Aside from that inane drivel, their preoccupation with sex boggles the mind, particularly 'unnatural' sex, because in most cases natural connection is forbidden; whereas, so long as it is unnatural connection there is no guilt -- anything goes, including sex with animals. Better to call it like it is: mental illness, spiritual deprivation. Perversion.

That sexual perversion is being promoted today, and to our children, as natural and normal is explained in a news article from MassNews titled, "It's Official: 'Diversity' Includes Sex With Animals'. A few random paragraphs are excerpted below. According to the article, Professor Pete Singer, from Princeton University's 'Center For Human Values' is,

". . . telling the world that sex with animals is fine as long as it doesn't hurt the animal. Therefore, he cautions against sex with chickens because, he says, it always results in the death of the chicken.

Singer bases his argument on the fact that bestiality has always existed in the world, and therefore it must be normal. . . . He cited six pictures over a 2500-year period to show that this is 'normal' behavior. He cites the discredited Alfred Kinsey for the ridiculous statement that over 50% of rural boys in America had sex with animals.

MassNews was one of the first newspapers in the country to report in 1999 that the American Psychological Association had published a study indicating that pedophilia can have a positive influence on a child.

According to the study, the use of 'judgmental terms' such as 'child abuse,' 'molestation' and 'victims' must be eliminated. Instead, we should use neutral, value-free terms like 'adult-child sex.' We should not talk about the 'severity of the abuse,' but instead refer to 'the level of sexual intimacy'.

Much of this 'diversity' was predicted in 1979 by two scholars, Dr. C. Everett Koop and Dr. Francis Schaeffer, who said that adult/child sex would be normalized in the 1990s. This was inevitable, they said, because we no longer had a "Judeo-Christian base." Instead, we had moved to humanism with no fixed standards of values and morality."

'Judeo-Christian base'. There never was one. Calling oneself Judeo Christian is the same as calling oneself white-black, or black-white. Perhaps it is becoming clear that Judaism, which is really Talmudism/Pharisaism is one-hundred-eighty degrees (totally opposite) from what Christianity alleges to be. 'Judaism' is humanism, with standards of values and morality 'fixed' by the Talmudic rabbis. Christianity from the time Constantine got hold of it, defied the teachings of Christ, killing and torturing in the name of 'God'. Both religions - all religions today - were given us by the priesthood to accomplish what is being accomplished in our time.

Although most Christians pay little regard to Jesus' teachings, Jesus condemned the Pharisees as a wicked and adulterous generation. Under the Jews' scriptural law, adultery and unnatural sex are forbidden. The Talmudic Rabbis, though, in their 'gnashing at fleas' disputations found a way around those admonishments. The Pharisees were masters at 'interpreting' the law. Since adultery and homosexual acts were forbidden, they gave new definitions to the act and the actors.

Coitus between a man and a woman - outside of marriage - was considered adultery. However, they gave the word 'man' two definitions. A boy under age nine years and a day is not a man; and a goy is not a man, but a beast. Therefore, adultery is permitted with a man and a minor, with the wife of a minor, or the wife of a goy (a beast, not a man).

Adultery with an adult married Jew, forbidden in that it is not an unnatural connection, is acceptable if the male organ stays relaxed.

"connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum." (Yebamoth 55b)
". . . if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated. . . " (Yeb. 55b)

As well as giving new definitions to the word 'man', the Rabbi's covered their other perverted bases by allowing any sexual act between man, woman child or beast, or any combination thereof, so long as it is not 'in a normal manner'. They reasoned that the prohibitions in their scriptures referred only to normal sex between a man and his wife. Anything outside of that prohibition then, was exempt, because it was outside of the law. Therefore perversion is not only condoned, it is an unspoken encouragement by the very volume and nature of the rabbinical fixation on the subject with its detailed descriptions and nuances of natural versus unnatural acts. In Sanhedrin (55a):

'. . . since sexual intercourse with a woman is a natural thing, guilt should be incurred only for a natural connection, but for nothing else. . . '

Since their scriptures placed the death penalty on anyone having unnatural relations with man or beast, the Pharisees found a way around that, too. They pronounced only a Gentile who had unnatural relations with his wife, as guilty. The senselessness of some of their reasoning abounds throughout the 'great works', as this next from Sanhedrin 58(b)

"If a heathen had an unnatural connection with his wife, he incurs guilt; for it is written, 'and he shall cleave', which excludes unnatural intercourse."

Then, we see that unnatural connection is permitted to the Jew. No violations here. No punishment. Obviously the only restrictions in that regard would depend upon the actor's imagination. Footnote three, Sanhedrin 58(b)

"Raba objected: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen? Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew."

Perverted sex and bestiality were practiced in the temples in ancient times and was evidently acceptable then by the Pharisaical Priests. Dogs were trained for sexual purposes, and harlots were hired to perform the sexual act with the beasts in the temple! It is mentioned in the Old Testament in several places. The phrase, 'wages of a dog' refers to the cost of hiring the dog for the show. 'Dog priests' are mentioned in the Old Testament. The dog priests were homosexual priests who serviced their homosexual brothers.

Bestiality, although condemned if the act is committed in a 'carnal' or normal manner, is acceptable if it is performed by an unnatural connection. A footnote in Sanhedrin 55(a), in reference to bestiality states:

"If a woman allows herself to be made the subject thereof, whether naturally or not, she is guilty. But if a man commits bestiality, he is liable only for a connection in a natural manner, but not otherwise.

The footnote we just read is contradicted in the next excerpt. If the woman who had sex with a beast is permitted to marry a priest, that would suggest women who had sex with a beast were not found guilty. Yebamoth 59(b):

"a woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest."
"It once happened at Haitalu that while a young woman was sweeping the floor a village dog covered her from the rear (a case of unnatural intercourse) and Rabbi [Judah Hanasi] permitted her to marry a priest.

Again, in Yebamoth 59(b), we find the revered rabbis condoned the bestiality in the temple.

"Harlotry is not applicable to bestial intercourse. . . we learned that the hire of a dog and the price of a harlot are permitted."

Regarding child molestation, there seems to be little argument between the Rabbis. They agreed on the minimum and maximum ages at which it is acceptable to molest little boys and little girls. A woman having sex with a young boy, even her own son, before nine years and a day, did so with impunity. The little boys were fair game to men and women.

For instance in just one of the many Talmudic discussions of pederasty, Rabbis Rab and Samuel are deciding the rules about sex with children. Sanhedrin 54(b)

"Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. (2)"

Rab's words are followed in Footnote 2, Sanhedrin 54(b):

"i.e. Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum."

This from another subdivision of the Talmud, the Kethuboth (11b).

"When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [three years old] it is as if one puts the finger into the eye . . . "

Another footnote explains that as "tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years." The Rabbis themselves seem to believe they are immune from reaping what they sow. Hagigah (27a) states that no rabbi can ever go to hell.

Baba Mezia (59b) says that: A rabbi debates God and defeats him. God admits the rabbi won the debate.

Abhodah Zarah (17a) States that there is not a whore in the world that the Talmudic sage Rabbi Eleazar has not had sex with.

From a website out of Jerusalem, Israel, called Mechon Mamre (mechon-mamre.org) in the section titled 'Torah 101', it is stated:

"Judaism is not just a set of beliefs about God, man, and the universe. Judaism is a comprehensive way of life, filled with rules and practices that affect every aspect of life: what you do when you wake up in the morning, what you can and cannot eat, what you can and cannot wear, how to groom yourself, how to conduct business, who you can marry, how to observe the holidays and Sabbaths, and perhaps most important, how to behave towards God, other people, and animals. This set of rules and practices is known as halakhah."

Mechon Mamre is a small group of Torah scholars in Israel who live by the plain and simple meaning of the RaMBaM's [Maimonides] Mishne torah and actively encourage others to do so. The Torah scholars - writers of this site - explain that Judaism is about love and kindness to their neighbors, by 'commandment' of Jehovah, through Moses. When you read the following, remember Moses Mendelsohnn's words that: "Judaism is not a religion, it is a Law, religionized." (emphasis added)

"Many people think of Judaism as the religion of cold, harsh laws, to be contrasted with Christianity, the religion of love and brotherhood. This is an unfair characterization of both Judaism and Jewish law. Laws are at the heart of Judaism, but a large part of Jewish law is about love and brotherhood, the relationship between man and his neighbors. . . . In fact, acts of love and kindness are so much a part of Jewish law that the word "mitzvah" (literally, "commandment") is commonly used to mean any good deed.

'Love and brotherhood, the relationship between man and his neighbors. . . ' Acts of love and kindness are commandments. Yes. According to Maimonides' list of 613 laws which he codified into subject matter, we see No. 26 is indeed a mandate for Jews to love ... other Jews. We've listed just a few to show the blatant racism, long-held hatred of the goyim (especially Christians), and the commands to kill, exterminate, as Jehovah commanded in the Old Testament -- 'utterly destroy everything that breaths'.

No. 26:  To love all human beings who are of the covenant (Leviticus 19,18) (CCA60)
No. 56:  Not to intermarry with Gentiles (Deuteronomy 7,3) (CCN19).

No. 58: To lend to a Gentile at interest (Deuteronomy 23,21) According to tradition, this is mandatory (affirmative). [see No. 171]

No. 156:  Not to eat the flesh of a beast that died of itself (Deuteronomy 14,21) [but may sell it to the stranger...] 

No. 171:  Not to make a loan to an Israelite on interest (Leviticus 25,37)

No. 199:  To keep the Canaanite slave forever (Leviticus 25,46) (affirmative).

No. 311:  Not to refrain from putting a false prophet to death nor to be in fear of him (Deuteronomy 18,22) (negative). [Jesus was considered a 'false prophet'.]

No. 324:  To destroy idolatry and its appurtenances (Deuteronomy 12,2-3) (affirmative).

No. 326:  Not to give up hating the enticer to idolatry (Deuteronomy 13,9) (CCN25). [Jesus was called 'the enticer to idolatry']

No. 354:  Not to settle idolaters in our land (Exodus 23,33) (negative) (CCI26).

No. 355:  To slay the inhabitants of a city that has become idolatrous and burn it (Deuteronomy 13,16-17) [all non-Jews are 'idolaters']

No. 601:  Not to keep alive any individual of the seven Canaanite nations (Deuteronomy 20,16) (negative).

No. 602:  To exterminate the seven Canaanite nations from the Land of Israel (Deuteronomy 20,17)

No. 613:  To destroy the seed of Amalek (Deuteronomy 25,19) (CCA77).

The above commandments are considered unbreakable laws. They would be guilty for loaning to a gentile without charging interest. The 'our land' mentioned ultimately includes every square inch of land on planet earth, as we shall see in the next section. The great pity of it all is that whenever and where ever the Priestly Sect has gained control over monarchies and governments, the morals and ethics of that society as a whole have degenerated. Since they control the world economy today -- in effect, the world has become their playhouse.  

The inculcation begins with the children, mostly unknown by their parents. Values taught and practiced at home are overthrown by the demonstrably effective methods of mind control, including Skinnerian-type operant conditioning (B.F.Skinner) and values clarification in the government schools. Parents have no idea of what is happening because the children are told that their parents 'just wouldn't understand' and 'we don't want to upset our parents, do we?'

Then, at home, unless the parents preview every movie or video their children watch, they are subjected to subtle and not so subtle aberrant behavior. The 'PG' rating seems to give the parents a false sense of safety, and it is doubtful many parents today even pay attention to what their children are watching. When they're away from home what they see and hear is up for grabs.

Parents of adult children and grandchildren today - as a whole - lament the fact that their adult children do not, will not listen to reason, or warnings of the dangers to their children. That is understandable, because those adult children - the parents of today - were the children of yesterday whose minds were being stolen without their parent's knowledge. Grandparents today were raised in a much more innocent era -- innocent at least in comparison to today's permissive and warped climate.

The change was sudden and shocking, beginning in the early to mid-sixties. Along came drugs, the Beatles, the widely promoted Kinsey report, flower children and free sex. We've learned that the drugs were then, and are now, brought in by the CIA and other government agencies. Consider the benefits of drug running to the world's troublemakers:

1) It provides billions of unaccounted dollars for black ops (secret operations) carried out by the global spy network created and controlled by the troublemakers themselves.

2) Drug use lowers or eliminates the moral inhibitions of users; spreads disease and death (sharing needles and illicit sex), and increases crime at all levels, from petty theft to murder by addicts who cannot afford their habit.

3) Laws are passed making the use of drugs, including marijuana, a felony punishable by imprisonment and property seizure... bank accounts, cars, homes and businesses.

4) A WAR against drugs was declared, justifying countless Constitutional violations under war-time conditions (which 'conditions' are unconstitutional in themselves).    

As for the Kinsey Report, it is almost too awful to discuss, and we must, because the Report was elevated -- and remains so -- to the realm of a bonafide scientific study in the 'discovery' of 'normal' human sexuality. It began the sexual revolution that has ascended to the levels we are experiencing today, and Kinsey's statistics are being used in Sex Education programs in the public (government) schools now.

In a letter to Hillary Clinton from educrat Marc Tucker shortly after Clintons' first election to the presidency, November 11, 1992, Tucker says that David Rockefeller was 'radiating happiness'.

"Dear Hillary:

I still cannot believe you won. But utter delight that you did pervades all the circles in which I move. I met last Wednesday in David Rockefeller's office with him, John Sculley, Dave Barram and David Haselkorn. It was a great celebration. Both John and David R. were more expansive than I have ever seen them — literally radiating happiness.

We took a very large leap forward in terms of how to advance the agenda on which you and we have all been working — a practical plan for putting all the major components of the system in place within four years, by the time Bill has to run again."

In fact, in the eighteen-page letter, Tucker said it was the opportunity to institute the,

"entire American system for human resources development, almost all of the current components of which were put in place before World War II."

Our reader should note well that it didn't begin with Bill Clinton, and certainly nothing has changed under George W. Bush, the 'born-again' Skull and Bones Christian. The scheme is evil-slick, and the schemers take their time. The advancement of their plans for our children utilizing the 'educational system' under the Clinton administration was planned, and most of the components were put in place, before World War II. The 'human resources' being developed under the direction of the International Zionists are OUR CHILDREN!!!

The Workforce Development / School to Work laws are an integral part of that plan, emanating from UNESCO. The children are not being educated, they are being trained as 'worker bees' for the corporate workforce. The connection was found in a search on the internet using "UNESCO" and "Workforce Development", as shown in the following excerpt -- just one of many examples we could have used:

"Interagency Consultative Group on Secondary Education and Youth Affairs    UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 26-28 March 2002,

Room VI Summary of Strategy and Development of Activities

1. Briefly describe the main strategies that have been adopted by your Organization/ Agency in the field of secondary education reform and youth affairs since year 2000.

Three strategies standout: First, we have continued to advance the workforce development initiative commenced in 1997 and have seen a gradual deepening and widening of that effort with increasing implications for secondary education, whether formal or informal. Secondly, the workforce initiative has, logically also opened the way for school to work type initiatives . . . "

This plan is being implemented world wide, and state by state in the U.S. either by governors' executive orders or state legislation! In another website, progress in various countries was discussed. Our children are becoming mindless robots, under the very noses of their parents. About our children, Bertrand Russell, human philosopher and UNESCO advisor said:

"It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the state with money and equipment. . .

"When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in control of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen".

Recall the sex book published and circulated by UNESCO at a UN conference on children, promoting homosexuality and bestiality for young girls in order to avoid pregnancy. UNESCO is, for all practical purposes, the global school board from whence the indoctrination and training of our precious children originates.

Marc Tucker claimed that most of the components of the present educational system - the Human Resource Development system - were put in place before World War II. That brings to mind a conference and luncheon at the Bellevue-Stratford hotel, presented by the teacher's union of Pennsylvania shortly after the war's end, on March 1, 1947. A tri-fold pamphlet advertising the conference is titled, Education for One World.

Eight of the eleven individuals on the Committee on Arrangements were: Benjamin Anton, Sarah Derzowitz, Sophie Elfont, Nathan Moskowitz, Max Oran, Minerva Oran, Ray Rubin and Morton Sonnenfield; the Director was Dr. Ira Reid, Professor of Education, New York University. What do those names say to you?

On the pamphlet, under the heading, "What Does The Community Expect From Philadelphia Schools: Problems for Discussion", we read: (emphasis added)

"Preparing children for well-adjusted living"

"Importance of school support for program of Labor"

"Preparing Youth for needs of business and industry"

"Challenge of science in education for one world"

'Well-adjusted living' for the child would be to become a peaceful, obedient and compliant, adult slave. The schools support a program of labor, preparing our children for the needs of business and industry, while educating them for the one-world. A curious person would wonder how or why state legislators could pass laws that reduce our children and their own to 'Human Resources.

When the Pennsylvania Legislative Research Bureau (non-elected bill drafting group of lawyers) was drafting the Workforce Development System and Enhancement Act, a memo that came into our hands demonstrates how the UN mandates become law in the states. Always by deceit. The 'legal opinion' was actually giving suggested language to deceive the reader of the bill who does not question 'legal terms of art' and 'vague' allusions to the intent -- the vision - of the drafters. (emphasis added)

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania  

Date: February 11, 1997                               

Subject: Legal Opinion

To: Jane Pomerantz, Deputy Chief Counsel

From: Sarah C. Yerger, Assistant Counsel

"I have found no legal definition for the term 'legally constituted entity". There are several legal terms of art than can be used when referring to the RWIB's (Regional Workforce Investment Boards), such as executive agency, independent agency and instrumentality.

In order to fulfill the vision of the drafters of this legislation and prevent legal problems involving the interpretation of specific terms of art, I recommend not using any terminology and believe it is best to not "name" the RWIB's. Rather, language should be used which vaguely defines how the drafters want the RWIB's to function, i.e. RWIB's are accountable for workplace development funds and the Commonwealth is not to be held liable."

The February 11, 1997 memo continued in that vein for two pages, suggesting language, rewrites of certain sections of the bill, etc. Recall the date mentioned at the UNESCO meeting:

". . . We have continued to advance the workforce development initiative commenced in 1997

Obviously Governor Ridge wasted no time in obeying the orders of his masters. Good governors get great promotions, as we've noticed. As for the state legislators who passed the bill, of the several hundred in Pennsylvania it is a good bet that not more than five read the bill before voting for it... if that.

That is how unConstitutional 'laws' are made in every state, week in and week out, year in and year out; it is why we have all become unwitting slaves in a controlled economy... a Zionist controlled economy. Careless, thoughtless lawmakers are unimpeded by their constituents too busy and too dumbed down by the controlled media and phony conservative leaders to pay attention.

We should remember that before the UN got its final name it began as the League to Enforce Peace; that was changed to the League of Nations; and finally, during World War II, it became the United Nations. And, once again, whose bright idea was the United Nations? According to Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow, at the Carlsbad Congress on 8-24-1922:

"The League of Nations is a Jewish idea. We created it after a fight of 25 years".

To repeat what has been said several times: the International Zionist's plan for World Dominion is a political program. Mandates from the United Nations are implemented by local and state politicians most of whom haven't a clue; and the engine driving the plan is religion. With their laws, the perversions of the Talmud - 'Jewish' law - is fast becoming a normal, healthy way of being for Americans and the worlds masses.

Also covered at the 1947 conference, under the heading, "What Do Teachers Expect..." the Problems for Discussion include:

"Teachers salaries and living standards"

"Administration responsibility for forceful citywide inter-cultural program"

"The Union teacher works for security and peace. Exposing the enemies of peace and of world-cooperation"

'Teachers salaries and living standards'. In some school districts teachers are allowed to purchase homes in affluent neighborhoods at greatly reduced prices. Their living standards are out-pacing the average worker-bee today, and all they have to do in return is tow the line, follow instructions, target - for 'remediation' - any child who thinks for himself, select out the exceptionally bright for special challenge classes to begin the tearing-down process in order to rebuild them into world citizens.... we could fill a page with the abominations. Just doing their job, to keep their job that destroys the minds and lives of their victim students.

In his letter to Hillary, laying out the Human Resource Development system, Marc Tucker said that:

"Our objective will require a change in the prevailing culture - the attitudes, values, norms, and accepted ways of doing things."

Teachers are to 'expose the enemies of peace and world cooperation'. Those enemies would be the children who don't conform, or parents who at least have the sense to object. Teachers make note of innocent and revealing comments made by the children, and a dossier is built throughout the school years that contains personal information not only about the child, but everyone in the family -- and the extended family. The dossier is intended to follow the child throughout his whole life, from school to work, until death. Do you recall hearing the phrase, 'cradle to grave'? They mean it.

The last group of Problems for Discussion at the Teachers Conference under the heading, "What Does Youth Expect..." are:

"Intercultural relations among students"

"The democratic teacher"

"A curriculum for World Citizenship"

That conference on Education for One world, was held in 1947... fifty-five years ago. How much progress do you think has been made in those fifty-five years? The primary goal has not changed; it has been strengthened because nearly three generations are now locked in its embrace, caught under the spell cast so long ago. That goal is creating the World Citizen, educating the children to an 'International Understanding', and perverting their morals all the while.

If you understand that, you will understand that teachers are molding their students' minds to the attitude that perversion is a 'normal healthy way of being'. Not too long ago - within the past year or so - parents in a Pennsylvania school district successfully replaced the liberal school board members with people who had not fallen for the decadent rhetoric. The schoolboard rewrote their policies that would prohibit the promotion of homosexuality and other injurious programs.

While the parents were celebrating the victory for their children, their own children went on strike, refusing to come to class, accusing the board and their parents of homophobia, intolerance, and prejudice. What shock those parents must have felt to realize their efforts were too little too late. The indoctrination had prevailed.

Recall, from the Protocols, who claim control of the education system, remembering that the Protocols were published nearly a hundred years ago: from Protocol No. 9, recently quoted:

"We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the corner-stones of a free existence.

We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated."

Let us return to Alfred Kinsey, Jewish father of the sexual revolution. Kinsey was a homosexual, a pedophile, and a madman. His staff consisted of like-minded non-professionals who were touted as 'experts', and his subjects polled consisted of the dregs of humanity: psychopaths, rapists, pedophiles, sexual deviants, the mentally retarded, inmates of mental institutions, and criminals of all walks of life.

Kinsey -- possibly a victim from his infancy of the same evil acts he committed -- was a sexual deviant and most of all a monstrous child molester as were those on his staff. Testimony to that fact is chapter 5 of the Report, which could only be described as torture and sexual violation of infants, toddlers and prepubescent children.

Table 34, itemizing the ages of each 'subject' -- male babies aged five months to 14 years -- used in the 'scientific study', also listed the number of infantile orgasms in a given time period, multiple orgasms, and proves beyond even a shadow of doubt that the innocent, helpless, babies were being criminally sexually abused.

To our knowledge, no charges were ever levied either against Kinsey himself or the institution. At this point, that is not surprising is it?... when we understand that the underlying motive is the destruction of an entire nation, socially, morally and spiritually. When morals and spirituality go, so goes the nation. The term 'babies' is used to define all children involved, because in the life span, prepubescent children are yet babes.

As painful as it is to type these following words, or for you - our reader - to read them, I find that unless we are hit smack in the head, in the gut, and in our heart with the gruesome details, the inhumanity of these creatures escapes our senses. It seems to be stored as just more information somewhere in a place where our emotions do not enter.

Here is an extract from chapter five of the Kinsey Report, describing what happened to those babies during the scientific investigation. As you read, consider this crime being committed on one of your children - or a child you love. Infants of 5 months, 11 months, toddlers, all the way up to 14 years. The excerpt is taken from a report by Judith Reisner:

"Extreme tension with violent convulsion: Often involving the sudden heaving and jerking of the whole body. Descriptions supplied by several subjects indicate that the legs often become rigid, with muscles knotted and toes pointed, muscles of abdomen contracted and hard, shoulders and neck stiff and often bent forward, breath held or gasping, eyes staring or tightly closed, hands grasping, mouth distorted, sometimes with tongue protruding; whole body or parts of it spasmodically twitching, sometimes synchronously with throbs or violent jerking of the penis. ... A gradual, and sometimes prolonged build-up to orgasm, which involves still more violent convulsions of the whole body; heavy breathing, groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially among younger children)"

Not one of the monster 'experts' who brought those babies to multiple orgasms has been named a criminal or a terrorist. If the facts upset our reader, consider the life-long scars carried by those baby victims. Many are possibly today's perverts. The Kinsey Report was was touted as the book of facts on normal human sexuality. Those who didn't fit in to the statistics often felt that 'something must be wrong' with them.

When we realize for how many decades the Zionist Jews have been in control of the U.S. government and all its agencies, government schools , the entertainment media - including movies, music, videos, and video games (sex and violence) - along with control of the news media, including first the press, then radio and television... we realize why our culture and values have drastically changed over three generations.

And now we have the Internet, where filth and Satanism abound, protected by the first Article of Amendment to the Constitution - freedom of speech - its great 'defender' being the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), a legal defense organization created by Jews, not to defend Constitutional protections, but to destroy our culture and society -- with the help of the courts.

Aside: About the ACLU - recently the ACLU is being touted for its defense in the "rights to privacy" against Big Brother Government. It is for no other purpose than to gain popularity and induct new members. Here is an excerpt from an essay on the ACLU by William H. McIlhany. Notice from where the ACLU gets large grants of money.

"One reason why some prominent leaders of the ACLU have been so opposed to public and private investigations of subversion must relate to what such an investigation would reveal about the Union itself.

The ACLU was formed out of earlier organizations in 1920 and its Executive Director and moving spirit until 1950 was Roger Baldwin. Before he died at age 97 in 1981, his ideology may have changed, but during the early years of his ACLU tenure there is no doubt where he stood.

In the "Harvard Class Book of 1935, spotlighting Baldwin's class of 1905 on its thirtieth anniversary, he was quoted as saying,

"I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole control by those who produce wealth. Communism is, of course, the goal."

He gave this advice in 1917 to an associate who was forming another group:

"Do steer away from making it look like a Socialist enterprise...We want also to look like patriots in everything we do. We want to get a good lot of flags, talk a good deal about the Constitution and what our forefathers wanted to make of this country, and to show that we are really the folks that really stand for the spirit of our institutions."

It should not be surprising to note that Baldwin was active during the 1930's in quite a few of the Communist Party's United Front organizations - he was an officer of the Garland Fund, for instance - along with other ACLU leaders including Rev. Harry Ward, Rev. John Haynes Holmes, Clarence Darrow, Scott Nearing, Robert Morss Lovett, Arthur Garfield Hayes, Archibald MacLeish, and Oswald Fraenkel.

ACLU leadership also included identified Communist Louis Budenz, Robert Dunn and Corliss Lamont. ACLU activists William Z. Foster and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn would later become leaders of the Communist Party, U.S.A.

Since that time, the ACLU's official left-leaning activism has only steadily increased. Some local affiliates of the Union have always led this crusade, such as the Southern California ACLU which had maintained on its Board identified Communist Party operative Frank Wilkinson.

While the national ACLU has not been characterized as a Communist front by any state or federal investigation since 1938, any doubt about its becoming a 'staunch defender' of individual rights was put to rest in April 1976, when the ACLU National Board formally reinstated Communist Elizabeth Gurley Flynn "posthumously" in its ranks. Despite this partisanship, the ACLU and its affiliated tax-exempt foundation continue to receive substantial yearly support from the Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Field, and other foundations."

On the InterNET, websites such as sweetliberty.org, that are exposing the lies and urging visitors to become involved in their local and state governmental processes are filtered from users' access and labeled 'militant - extremist'. Consider the terminology: InterNET on which we create WEB sites. That verbiage is not coincidental. It is part of the seamless web, in which billions will be caught. The Internet was not created for our use. It was created to further ensnare our minds, thus our souls.

This is not to lay all the blame at the feet of the perpetrators. We all make choices and within each of us is that still small 'voice', if you will, that tells us right from wrong. Mostly we don't listen. It goes without saying that most Jews have not read the Talmud, as many Christians do not read the Bible. They take as 'gospel' truth, what their religious leaders tell them, all the while embracing the ungodly tenets of Talmudism -- both Jews and Zionist Christians.

There are some who vehemently claim that a Jew could never shed the chains of his inheritance because of the genetics: 'It is in their blood'. I personally have two Jewish friends who have done just that. Given we are spiritual beings inhabiting physical bodies, it follows that Spirit is more powerful than genetics. It is now and always has been a matter of choice. However, if the Jew is never informed of the lies that bind, the choice would most likely not become a question. Therein lies the danger

Many Jews do not attend synagogue; however, when the Rabbi or a Jewish periodical tells them to send money for the 'cause' in Israel, they line up and ante up. When they're told to vote for a particular Jew running for office, they tow the Jewish line. That is where the dangerous control mechanism kicks in. It seems to be an instinctive, internal switch that results in the type of mentality experienced with the Zionist Jew mentioned earlier. "It makes us proud when one of our own does good".

Regardless of your acceptance or rejection of this information, we had best be clear -- all of us of all religions -- that the small group behind the scenes who are steering us, leading us, manipulating us toward their plan for World Dominion are dead serious. The Talmud is 'law' to them, because they are of the ruling sect that wrote the law.

As for the equally dangerous Christian Zionists who believe that killing and dying for world order is of divine design, their part in the successful culmination of the plan if it comes to full fruition will bring grief and regret beyond words. In a recent BBC broadcast (follow the link to our audio page, then scroll to the bottom to find the BBC broadcast), the British Washington correspondent claimed there are forty million of those Christian Zionists, adding their energy and religious zeal to the pro-Israel lobby -- cheering the slaughter on to greater and greater heights praying it will end in a world conflagration.

For Christians who claim to be Judeo-Christian, the word 'Christian' should be dropped. The term - Judeo Christian or Christian Zionist -  is truly the epitome of oxymoronic doublespeak. Christianity is simply being merged into Talmudism / Pharisaism. Christianity today IS the religion of the Jews, and Jesus' love has been spurned.

Along with the dissolution of Christianity by way of its being merged with Talmudism, equally ominous is the fact that Constitutional law is quickly being chewed up and spit out as Talmudic law. The 'Law' of the Pharisees.

On January 12, 2000, Stephen Ames, Jr., a guest on the Sweet Liberty broadcast, read to us from a book written by Menachem Elon, Deputy President, Supreme Court of Israel. (Remember the author's name - Menachem Elon. It appears in a news article following, although the newspaper spelled his first name without the 'c' -- 'Menahem'.)

Published by The Jewish Publication Society, Philadelphia Jerusalem 5754 / 1994, Elon's book is titled: JEWISH LAW; HISTORY, SOURCES, PRINCIPLES; Ha-Mishpat Ha-Ivri; Volume 1. On pages 1144-1145 the author is discussing the codification of law in Europe and the U.S. in comparison with codification of Jewish Law. Elon says of Maimonides:

"This quality of Jewish law is axiomatic and beyond dispute. Not even Maimonides, who compiled the greatest and most nearly perfect halakhic code of all, sought to establish his work as the source of halakhic authority... Nor did Maimonides entertain even the slightest idea of introducing any change in the law through his work. He then concluded: [referring to Maimonides introduction to his code book]
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all the customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactments of the Talmudic Sages because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in the Talmud ..."

'Every town and country must . . . give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactments of the Talmudic Sages. . . '  My casual and somewhat sarcastic remark was, "who cares what a former Israeli Supreme Court Justice says. That doesn't affect us." Next day -- as if in direct response to that conversation -- the Newark, New Jersey Star Ledger, 1-13-00, carried two articles on Talmudic law in the U.S. (emphasis added) The first headline boasted:

The Talmud confronts Florida's electric chair

By Amy Ellis Nutt; Star-Ledger Staff:

Evidence of the increased interest in Jewish legal studies at American law schools can be found in the fact that more than three dozen schools now teach the subject; that the American Association of Law School Professors has its own Jewish law section; and that there is now a Jewish law casebook being used as a reference tool in courses on the subject.

But the most profound evidence may well be found right now at the highest level of American Justice. Last month, a brief was filed before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding Florida's use of the electric chair and whether it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution.

What makes this brief unique is that it does not rely on a single tenet of American law, but rather solely on the Talmud.

According to the two lawyers who filed the brief, Nathan Lewin and former Israel Supreme Court Justice Menahem Elon, the Talmud can provide an important way for evaluating the fair implementation of the death penalty.

"What we're saying is that under Jewish law three principles apply", Lewin told the Jerusalem Post. "That you should (execute) as painlessly as possible, as quickly as possible, and with the least mutilation of the body as possible. Those all derive from the principles that were in the Talmud 2,000 years ago". They are consistent, as well, with the Eighth Amendment. . .

"I would consider it a substantial contribution", Lewin said, "if in either a majority or concurring or some opinion, the court says,

'Look, our conclusion that this is cruel and unusual punishment is buttressed, is informed, is supported by the fact that 2,000 years ago the rabbis in the Talmud said it would be impermissible to actually burn somebody at the stake, because that would be a death that would disfigure and would cause pain over an extended period of time'.

"That would engender respect in the world at large for a body of law that we study all the time and believe is divinely inspired and worth our time and attention."

Think about what you've just read! The U.S. Supreme Court accepted a brief based solely on Talmudic Law and which did 'not rely on a single tenet of American law'. Do bear in mind that the U.S. Supreme Court was established to decide cases where the constitutionality of laws come into dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court was created by the states as a branch of the federal government under the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court is not the supreme law of this land, nor are decisions made by Supreme Court justices when those decisions effectively amend the Constitution!

It would be worthwhile to read again (from Doug Reed's book) Dr. Kastein's explanation of how the scribes translated / wrote the Talmud, along with their peculiar interpretations and interpolations:

". . . with a definite object in view, that of making it comprehensible to the Greeks; this led to the distortion and twisting of words, changes of meaning, and the frequent substitution of general terms and ideas for those that were purely local and national".

In essence then, the Talmud is a compilation of the distortions, twisted words, changed meanings, and frequent substitution by the priesthood, of the true Law of Creator. The Talmud, as Jesus charged, is man's law -- an evil and perverted law, as opposed to the immutable, changeless Laws of Creation as Jesus taught . . . to simply do unto others as you would have others do unto you, and that -- in perfect justice -- we are allowed to reap what we sow. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, because the 'knowledge of good and evil' -- knowing right from wrong -- is a knowing within each and every one of us.  

Talmudic law allows and encourages homosexuality, pedophilia, sodomy, and bestiality. Talmudic law commands its adherents to charge usury to all gentiles, while forbidding lending with interest to Talmudists (Jews). In fact, in the Old Testament we find specifically the commandment of Jehovah in Deut. 15: 6 that:

"... and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee".

Talmudic law commands the killing of all gentiles, especially Christians, since they are 'heretics' and 'blasphemers'. Jews who have fallen for the lies of the Talmud, and Christian Zionists who have fallen for the lies of their particular brand of 'Christianity' are truly people of the damned.

It appears that the Talmud prevailed before the U.S. Supreme Court, since Old Sparky has been cast out of use. Mr. Lewin's assertion that the Talmud would not permit burning at the stake because "that would be a death that would disfigure and cause pain over an extended period of time", is a lie. It belies the words and commands of their god, Jehovah, as well as the Talmudic Law itself, as stated in Sanhedrin, 64a:

"He who gives of his seed to Moloch incurs no punishment."

Moloch was an Ammorite god of the Old Testament. He who 'gave his seed' to Moloch did so by throwing his newborn baby into a fire, burning the infant alive - a human sacrifice. The Talmudic sages decreed that the act of burning a live infant as a sacrifice to Moloch incurred no punishment. Another name for Moloch could be Jehovah, as we read in Exodus 13: 1,2:

"And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast; it is mine."

In Ezekiel 20: 25-26, because Jehovah was ticked off when his 'peculiar and special' people had not obeyed all his statutes and judgments, he said:

"Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live;

And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the Lord."

And Jesus said:

"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea." Matt: 18:6

The second article featured in the Star-Ledger on 1-13-2000 is a lengthy discourse on why Talmudic law is being taught in American law colleges. We will excerpt from this one. Above a photo of Rutgers-Camden Talmudic law professor, Steve Friedell, reading the Talmud in his office is the caption:

"A professor finds his calling in teaching Jewish law at Rutgers".

Using the phrase 'Jewish Law' throws the reader off track. There is no such thing as 'Jewish Law'! Jewish law is Talmudic Law. Another small photo gives a close-up shot of a book which caption states:

"Below, Friedell holds a copy of the Talmud".

What is not explained to the readers of the article is that Friedell is holding up only one volume of the 63-volume set. Instead, the Talmud is presented as 'a' book and described as:

"... the 2,000 year old book of Jewish law... a towering collection of writings, 5,422 pages long, without vowels and punctuation."

Another glaringly omitted fact is the existence of the oral law, non-written to ensure that no gentile could ever discover its content. The headline on this second article (emphasis added) reads:

He answers to a higher authority

"Friedell is a professor at Rutgers University Law School-Camden, and is one of just a handful of law school academia in the country specializing in the teaching of Jewish law. For hundreds of years in this country, law students and legal scholars have relied on American casebook law to illuminate the intricacies of our legal system.

But with globalization taking place in every area of life -- from politics to economics to art and entertainment -- law schools are now recognizing the importance of studying non-Anglo-American legal systems and incorporating such courses as Jewish law into their curricula.

. . . If a Talmudist is an expert in the Talmud, he is surely a humble one -- it is a book, says the slightly graying professor, that constantly challenges, constantly encourages debate, and leaves the student always looking for new insights.

. . . In a 1992 article he wrote for the Indiana Law Journal, Friedell quoted a character from Herman Wouk's novel, Inside, Outside:

"Under the opaque Aramaic surface of the Talmud is a magnificent structure of subtle legal brilliancies, all interwoven with legend, mysticism, the color of ancient times, and the cut-and-thrust of powerful minds in sharp clash. I can't get enough of it, and I've been at it for decades."

Clearly Friedell feels likewise.

. . . Rayman Solomon, the dean of Rutgers-Camden Law School is a big supporter of Friedell. "There has been a real renaissance in the study of Jewish law", says Solomon, "and a renewed interest in comparative law in general: Roman law, Greek law, Jewish law.."

. . . Friedell, who says that more than half of his Jewish law classes are composed of non-Jewish students, holds his specialized seminar every other year at the Law School in Camden. When he is not teaching the course in Camden, he is teaching it as an undergraduate course in New Brunswick -- but using Hebrew texts.

. . . Says Friedell: "The Talmud isn't studied for any particular reason, it's studied just as an end in itself. It's a boundless sea. . . And I've just scratched the surface".

So there it is... 'with globalization taking place in every area of life', why should we rely only on the U.S. Constitution as our basis of law? Our option, of course, would be to obey the 'law of nations' via the International Criminal Court, founded on Talmudic Law. The Talmud 'constantly challenges, constantly encourages debate, and leaves the student always looking for new insights'. Those 'new insights' are nothing more than interpretations of vaguely written laws -- vaguely written to invite interpretation, depending upon the circumstances and the individuals concerned.

To illustrate that the interpretation does indeed depend upon the individuals and circumstances involved: In 1979, three Jewish legislators, Elizabeth Holtzman, Joshua Eilberg and William Lehman, heavily supported by major Jewish organizations, successfully lobbied for passage of the 'Holtzman Amendment'. This new law created the OSI (Office of Special Investigations of the Justice Department) to ferret out alleged 'Nazi war criminals' living in the U.S.

Over its twenty-year history, at a cost of $60,000,000, fifty octogenarians have been deported as a result of the mostly-Jewish staffed OSI's 'ferreting'. Two fairly recent example of their activities and double standards were found first in a 11-4-1998 Chicago Sun Times article (excerpted):

"Jewish community leaders applauded an immigration judge's decision to deport (Bronislaw Hajda, 74) who served as a guard in a Nazi labor camp in WWII."

One of the Jews said that, 'a measure of justice is achieved'. So, fifty-three years after the war, a former soldier (who was 21 years old at the time of his alleged 'crime') was deported, forever separated from family, friends, and his home of more than half a century, in spite of the fact that absolutely no crime could be proven against him. On the other side of the coin, just one month later, an Associated Press article that appeared in several major papers on 12-9-1998 stated:

"Warsaw -- Israel has refused to extradite a Jew accused of atrocities against German prisoners in Poland after WWII, the Polish Justice Ministry said yesterday. Solomon Morel, who commanded the Swietochlowice camp for Germans in southern Poland from February to November 1945, allegedly tortured inmates and is considered responsible for at least 1,538 deaths.

Israel refused Poland's request for extradition, saying the statute of limitations had run out".  from: End Times - End Games by Hans Schmidt

Where Jewish revenge is concerned, there is no statute of limitations, even when no crime has been proven against an individual. Yet, when a Jew commits genocide against gentiles, Israel refuses to extradite on grounds that the statute of limitations ran out. The OSI is funded by Americans (98% gentiles according to census figures).

Now comes the International Criminal Court (ICC), as part and parcel of the globalization of law. Not a new idea, the ICC was first dubbed the International Court of Justice less than a year after the U.S. signed Americans up as members of the United Nations Organization, to keep the peace, mind you. As reported in U.S. Department of State Publication 2808, 1947, on page 2 we read:

The Acting United States Representative to the United Nations to the

Secretary General of the United Nations

United States Delegation to the United Nations

August 26, 1946

"EXCELLENCY: I have the honor to transmit herewith, under cover of a note dated August 16, 1946. . . a Declaration by the president of the United States of America [Harry S. Truman] recognizing, on behalf of the United States of America, the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under Article 36 of the Statute of the Court.

My action today in depositing this Declaration, accepting on behalf of the United States the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, is further testimony to the determination of my Government to do all in its power to assure that the United Nations will fulfill the role assigned to it, which is nothing less than the preservation of world peace.

One of the most elemental functions of the United Nations in the preservation of world peace is the development of procedures of pacific settlement. In these procedures, the role and functions of law is clear. We feel that international law is already sufficiently developed to serve as a guide and basis in international relations. We feel further that the best way of assuring its further development, and the only way of enabling it to fulfill its function, is by referring to a responsible international tribunal all disputes properly justiciable by such a tribunal.

We accordingly look forward to a great development of the rule of law in international relations through a broad acceptance of the function of the Court in the spirit of this Charter. Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration. -- Herschel V. Johnson

Harry Truman's declaration on behalf of the United States of America, on August 16, 1946, stated in part the recognition of the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in all legal disputes hereinafter arising concerning the interpretation of a treaty; any question of international law; and the nature or extent of the reparation to be made for the breach of an international obligation.

In March, 1994, the U.S. Congress passed legislation authorizing the implementation of an International Criminal Court. Professor Cherif Bassiouni, of DePaul University in Chicago -- the leading academic proponent of the ICC, who is world-renowned for his expertise on the subject -- had proposed expanding greatly on the list of crimes under ICC jurisdiction, arguing in favor of the "broadest possible jurisdiction of the court".

He proposed such additional international crimes as environmental offenses, insults to a foreign State and disseminating false or distorted information. The same group who created and controls the UN also owns and controls the media, which consistently disseminates false and distorted information. That won't count of course. The list of crimes isn't complete, by the way, and once the UN's Court is fully recognized we can count on the list ever-expanding as the ICC tests its power.

A report by the Congressional Research Service (August 14, 1990 - Revised: March 9, 1993), authored by Daniel Hill Zafren, had this to say about adding to the list of 'International Crimes': (excerpted):

"Summary: While a complex and controversial subject. . . recent world events have supplied a new impetus for serious study and consideration of such a proposal, along with the possibility of increasing categories of war crimes and, perhaps, even enactment of an international criminal code.

Introduction: ". . . two areas of thought have been receiving increased attention. One is the possible formation of an international criminal court. . . and/or the already established international crimes, as well as taking jurisdiction over any additional crimes that may be established by any future international criminal code.

Some arguments in favor of such a proposal: The United Nations International Law Commission has declared that the establishment of a permanent international criminal court is possible, and has suggested a workable structure for it. . .

It would symbolize the supremacy of law. It would be the start of legal respect for, and making more effective, the construction of an international order. . . "

Recall that the United Nations, a.k.a. the League of Nations, a.k.a. the League to Enforce Peace is "a Jewish idea", as Nahum Sokolow stated at the Carlsbad Congress on 8-24-1922.

The International Criminal Court will serve as the 'keeper of peace' for the world, when the priesthood comes into its full power -- if they succeed. (They've been trying for 3,000 years and haven't succeeded yet). According to Theodore Pike's Israel - Our Duty our Dilemma, the final gathering of Jews won't be only in Israel, for they believe that the whole world will be their playground. From pp. 54-55):

"In legal and business matters, the Gentile also found himself beneath equality with the Jew. This - as the Jewish Encyclopedia explains under 'Gentile' p.620 - was because the Gentiles had been 'outlawed' by God from the beginning:
"The passage in Moses' farewell address: 'The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from Mount Paran'. . . indicates that the Almighty offered the Torah to the Gentile nations also, but, since they refused to accept it, He withdrew His 'shining' legal protection from them, and transferred their property rights to Israel, who observed His law.

A passage in Habaakuk is quoted as confirming this claim: 'God came from Teman, and the Holy One from Mount Paran. . . He stood and measured the earth he beheld, and drove asunder [outlawed] the nations.'. . . the Talmud adds that He had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Noachian precepts, and hence He decided to outlaw them [the Gentile nations]". Baba Kama (38a)

So, according to the Talmud, all land is their land. In an article by J. Zane Walley, of the Paragon Foundation titled "A Lightening Bolt of Reality -- The Forced Relocation of Rural Populations", Walley said:

"I followed that thread into the spool and stumbled on a United Nations website, U.N. Protected Areas in the United States. The website contained 129 fine-print pages of U.N. Protected areas in America! 129! Millions upon millions of acres of our country are listed. Those protected areas are regulated by the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). When I compared the U.N protected areas to regions that are under fire from federal regulators and environmental takings that force people from the land, I found they are the same.

In researching the IUCN I found that they are the environmental agency of the United Nations, bringing together 76 states, 111 government agencies, 732 NGOs (non-governmental organizations), 36 affiliates, and some 10,000 scientists and experts from 181 countries. Their membership list of signatory American agencies and NGOs has dumbfounded me.

U.S agencies with IUCN membership and providing funding include: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, U.S. Agency for International Development, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce and Department of State.

Other documents also have severely unnerved me. The United Nations Program of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development produced a how-to manual, The Forced Relocation of Rural Populations, which was distributed in Africa and included the stated mission,

"To foster a more balanced spatial distribution of the population by promoting in an integrated manner equitable and ecologically sustainable development."

Our own government has two publications in print that will raise your hackles: The first, Your Rights and Benefits as a Displaced Person, (Pub. No. FHWA-PD-95-010) states, "Government programs designed to benefit the public often result in acquisition of private property and sometimes in the displacement of people from their residences, businesses, or farms."

The other pamphlet, Acquiring Real Property for Federal and Federal Aid Programs and Projects (Publication No. FHWA-PD-95 -005), spells out how the government can take your land. The U.S Government publications and the U. N. Manual have analogous themes."

For our reader who wants to verify the 'UN Protected Area' program, specifically in the United States, listed by State alphabetically, the direct access URL is:

www.unep-wcmc.org/cgi-bin/pa_un97.p?country=usa%3AUNITED+STATES+OF+AMERICA&list=on

Whose bright ideas do you suppose are the federal, state and local laws, rules, and regulations that have laid claim to hundreds of thousands of square miles of land in these united States? And progressive taxation on private property, so the worker bees lose their homes when the taxes climb beyond their ability to pay? And the tens of thousands of farms lost to the bankers, by hook and by crook?

People (non-lawyers) who have spent years studying law in the U.S. claim there are 6,000,000 laws on the books today. When one takes into account the myriads of ordinances in the thousands of local units of government, combined with state and federal laws, along with bureaucratic rules and regulations that are given force of law, that figure doesn't sound like a stretch.

In our Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the 2001-02 session there are over 600 proposed new laws relating to taxation alone! See what the Protocols say about that:

"From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property.

The tax upon the poor man is a seed of revolution. . .

A tax increasing in a percentage ratio to capital will give a much larger venue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the people."  Protocol No. 20

It would not be wise to dismiss this as lightly as I initially dismissed the quote in Menachem Elon's book on Jewish (Talmudic) Law. Could this 'vast and living work' called the Talmud, be the reason why judges in today's court systems are so flagrantly violating Constitutional law in favor of their 'interpretation' of the law? The answer to that can also be found in the Protocols:

"Under our influence the execution of the laws of the goyim has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere.

In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions judges decide as we dictate to them, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the goyim, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have anything in common with them...

In general, our judges will be elected by us only from among those who thoroughly understand that the part they have to play is to punish and apply laws and not to dream about the manifestations of liberalism at the expense of the educationary scheme of the State, as the goyim in these days imagine it to be."  Protocol No. 15 

Could this be the reason why the laws from both the U.S. Congress and State Legislatures - for that matter from Local Governments too - are written so broadly and vaguely? Of course it is. And under which 'authority' are the laws written? Is that authority the Constitution for the United States of America or the Babylonian Talmud? The answer to that is becoming all too frighteningly clear. 

Who drafts the language for those great numbers of laws, given we know it isn't the legislators themselves? The drafters are the swarms of lawyers (Jesus called them 'scribes') who work for the multitudes of non-governmental organizations and environmentalist groups. And who do you suppose owns the environmentalist movement?

For state and local governments there are (at last count) 56 adjunct organizations created by the Council of State Governments (CSG) mentioned earlier. Proposed state laws are written by the lawyers for these various organizations and heavily lobbied within the halls and offices of government.

To name but a few of these NGOs: National Association of Governors, National Conference of State Legislators, National Association of Counties (affiliated with the state associations, which brag of their 'offices on Capitol Hill in D.C.')... there are associations of Chiefs of Police, Mayors, Township Supervisors, Secretaries of State, Lieutenant Governors, the list is seemingly endless. It could be safely asserted that there is an 'association' for every elected official and appointed bureaucrat.

On the other side of this same coin is the independent ALEC - American Legislative Exchange Council - purportedly established as a 'conservative alternative' to the more liberal NCSL. ALEC was established by Paul Weyrich and became the most powerful lobby in state legislatures during the mid-seventies through the early nineties attempting to dupe the legislators into calling for a Constitutional Convention, in order to finally rid themselves of that pesky instrument (the Constitution for the united States of America). They nearly succeeded.

Before we leave off here we must mention that state legislators today - at least in Pennsylvania - are advised in their various committees by hired Executive Directors. As one researcher was told, their duties are to 'guide and direct the state legislators'.

The Pennsylvania Association of County Commissioners is 'guided and directed' by an executive director who 'works closely with the state legislature in promulgating laws pursuant to the local governments'. The newest fad in Pennsylvania is a bewildering array of Tax Fairness Laws. This brings to mind another statement from the Protocols.

"The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the art of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists...  Protocol No. 2

And how, indeed, are the people to perceive the underlying meaning of things when their representatives give the best of their energies to enjoying themselves?"  Protocol No. 10 

For the sake of continuity at this juncture, let us repeat two earlier quotes; the first from Protocol No. 9:

"Above the existing laws without substantially altering them, and by merely twisting them into contradictions of interpretations, we have erected something grandiose in the way of results.

These results found expression first in the fact that the interpretations masked the laws; afterwards they entirely hid them from the eyes of the governments owing to the impossibility of making anything out of the tangled web of legislation"

And from Brian Kennedy's Freemasonic Destruction of Western Civilization:

"The U.S. legal system enshrined the Talmudic practice of building up 'case law' on fine distinctions, and hairsplitting nuances.  Black can be made white or vice-versa, under such a system. It is a made-to-order recipe for tyranny and manipulation by unseen authority...

Of course, this was the intention from the very beginning. Jews have been controlled by their rabbis for two thousand years under the pernicious system."

Here's what the law students in the U.S. are learning today. A book from Penn State University, written by Benjamin Henszey, Barry Myers and Reed Phalan titled Introduction to Basic Legal Principles states:

"The law can be defined, therefore, as a body of rules for human conduct, enforced by a governing power, as the means by which the control of society is achieved.

The term society includes the neighborhood, town, state, nation and to the extent control among nations is achieved through law, the world.

The rules of law that exist today are the result of a process of gradual evolution over centuries of social progress, a process which continues unabated." 

Is there more than one book of law that has survived throughout centuries and is being used globally, including in the U.S. Supreme Court? The people of said 'book' are scattered to the ends of the earth and are bound to obey the laws contained therein. As we've also learned, the elite among the people of the Talmud are advisors to those who occupy - or they themselves occupy - positions of the highest political, economic and judicial power in this country and across the face of this earth. 

According to a document from Georgetown University titled the "Law of the Shitar" - being Jewish commercial law as early as 1060 AD in Europe - the Uniform Commercial Code is based on that law of the Shitar. With its adoption by all fifty states, the UCC has become national in nature. This explains the harmonization of Americas' laws with other nations, for the UCC is international law.

For its application in the U.S., the UCC was constructed by a group of lawyers from the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws - a permanent standing sub-committee created by the American Bar Association - which claims the UCC is the single most important document since the Constitution. The NCCUSL is also known as the 'Uniform Law Commission'.  

From its history on the ULC website we read that:

"Most significant was the 1940 Conference decision to attack major commercial problems with comprehensive legal solutions -- a decision that set in motion the project to produce the Uniform Commercial Code in partnership with the American Law Institute. The Code took ten years to complete and another 14 years before it was enacted across the country. It remains the signature product of the Conference. . . "

So, one by one, state legislatures adopted the Uniform Commercial Code. Courts of Justice become courts of commerce, and Americans wonder why their 'Constitutional rights' are being trampled in those seemingly foreign courts. We found confirmation regarding the Law of the Shitar in a most unusual source - the Harper Collins' Atlas Of World History. On pages 102 and 103, titled: The Jewish diaspora - AD 70 to 1497 - we read that:

"For over 2000 years the history of the Jews has been a story of external dispersion and internal cohesion.

From about the 6th century... Jews became identified with international and regional trade."

'International and regional trade' is regulated under the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and GATT/WTO (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization). These agreements control commerce between nations.

Recall the speech of Secretary of State, Cordell Hull, in 1941 proclaiming the end of nationalism and the imperialism of industry and free trade to be commenced after the defeat of Germany. Recall the main points agreed upon by the gathering of churchmen in 1942 declaring a world monetary system, open borders, etc.

Some of the people of the Talmud -- not all mentioned previously --  who wielded control of the U.S. Government, therefore its foreign policy since the early 1900s , under Wilson (WWI) and Roosevelt (WWII) are Supreme Court Justices Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter, Samuel Untermeyer, Col. Edward Mandel House, Bernard Baruch, and the whole gang of international bankers.

When international agreements made by the U.S. Congress prove to be nothing more than instruments of destruction to the manufacturing base, the jobs base, and therefore the very economic structure of our society... state legislators have an oath-bound duty to opt out of those agreements.

NAFTA and GATT/WTO are often referred to as 'treaties'. They are not treaties. Both were passed in Congress by a simple majority of both chambers. Treaties are ratified only by the U.S. Senate by two/thirds of those present and consenting.  

As for the Uniform Commercial Code, the same above mentioned World Atlas has this to say, of the Jews:

"Internal and external factors, including the widespread dispersal of Jews both in Islamic lands and throughout Christian Europe, Jewish group solidarity, facility of linguistic communication, and a uniform system of commercial law based on the Talmud accounted for the changes . . ."

'Facility of linguistic communication' - Hebrew school, so no matter where they live or what the language of their host country, they can always communicate.

'Jewish group solidarity' - a nation within nations.

'A uniform system of commercial law based on the Talmud' - the UCC.

Before we leave the Uniform Commercial Code, let us see what the code itself reveals, again, from the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) website:

U.C.C. - ARTICLE 1- GENERAL PROVISIONS

PART 1. SHORT TITLE, CONSTRUCTION, APPLICATION AND SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ACT

-------------------------------------------------------------------

§ 1-102. Purposes; Rules of Construction; Variation by Agreement.

(1) This Act shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies.

'Liberally construed' like the Talmud, to give the courts broad leeway in their interpretations, to promote its underlying purposes and policies? Think about it.

Earlier we quoted from Ted Pike's book, which transcribed a statement from the Jewish Encyclopedia, to wit:

". . . the Talmud adds that He [Jehovah] had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Noachian precepts, and hence He decided to outlaw them [the Gentile nations]'. Baba Kama (38a)

Before we leave the subject of Talmudic Law, we need to take a serious look at the 'seven moral Noachian precepts', also known as the Noahide (or Noachide) Law. . . from the Talmud, for the Goyim only.

The final account on this revelation of Talmudic Law which cannot be ignored is that of the Noahide (or 'Noachide') Laws. Even though the Noahide Laws proceed solely from the Talmud -- not the Old Testament -- they do not pertain to the Jews. They are laws constructed by the Pharisees and made part of their 'holy book', intended to be the foundation of world law for all Gentiles. Gentiles will become Hasidic Gentiles (grafted into, yet not part of, the tribe) or, it is promised, they -- together with their women and children -- will be exterminated 

Being solely a product of the Pharisees -- a figment of their warped imaginations -- one could easily dismiss the Noahide Laws as nonessential, unimportant, and especially not worthy of our concern. To do that, though, would be as ignorant (and dangerous) as my remark about the former Israeli Supreme Court Justice, Menachem Elon, and his quotation from Maimonides' pronouncement that:

"Every town and country must follow all the customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactments of the Talmudic Sages. . . ".

When I quipped "who cares?", little did I know that the U.S. Supreme Court is receiving briefs based solely on the Talmud!!! . . . and that law colleges today are establishing Talmudic Law departments for aspiring young Jew -- as well as non-Jew -- lawyers.

If that doesn't shatter your mind, you aren't getting it!  The U.S. Supreme Court was established under the Constitution for the United States of America, and was ostensibly established solely to hear matters of Constitutionality on the laws promulgated by state and federal legislation!

The ostensible purpose of the Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court is questionable and worthy of mention here, since we are discovering how far-reaching the long arm of the law has become, incorporating Talmudic tenets into the very lowest to the highest courts in this land. . . stretching around the globe to complete its serpentine stranglehold over our very lives.

In fact, the question has been answered, according to Ralph Boryszewski's research - with full documentation in his book, The Constitution That Never Was.  The Judicial section of the Constitution was not completed by the 'founders', leaving the establishment and rules of the courts totally up to the then-sitting U.S. Congress, most of them lawyers. In Article III, Section 1, the Constitution states that:

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

The Constitution was drafted in 1787 behind closed doors with windows nailed shut against any who might wish to hear the historical debates. From May to October -- the hottest months of the year in sultry Philadelphia -- the fifty-five delegates sweated it out in an unventilated room about 40' x 40'. Secrecy was the method by which they framed the Constitution and the American people.

James Madison was the front man in bringing the Con-Con about. When the delegates arrived from their various states they were given instructions to only amend the Articles of Confederation. Madison had the main draft of the intended new constitution ready and awaiting its opportunity to be presented. After some arguing and heated debate, the delegates agreed to form a committee-of-the-whole.

Therein a motion was offered, seconded, and passed. Washington (the cannot-tell-a-lie guy) rapped the gavel and announced that "the Articles of Confederation are hereby dissolved" (or words to that effect).

The question now is: Who was working behind the scenes with Madison to draft the treasonous constitution? It is clear that without the first Ten Articles of Amendment added to that "constitution" we would have been squashed sooner rather than later.

The attempted fraud was foiled with the addition of those Articles of Amendment; usurpation of power at the federal level could NEVER have occurred without the acquiescence of state legislatures, and the damage could be undone today if those state lawmakers (for God's sake!) knew, understood and actually cared about what they and their predecessors have done. Ralph Boryszewski explains how the betrayal was pulled off, pp 138-139:

"When many of the people in the ratifying conventions balked because of the great potential powers of the federal judiciary and because the document did not contain a Bill of Rights, George Washington and other leaders told the people to first approve the constitution and then to submit proposed amendments to the First Congress.
"The First congress accepted Bill of Rights proposals because there was such a persistent organized clamor for them, but they ignored all of the many changes to the Judicial Article proposed by the people from the various ratifying conventions. There was a sinister reason for this -- the Senate was operating behind locked doors just as the Constitutional Convention had previously operated in secrecy.
"Almost two years later on April 7, 1789 Oliver Ellsworth, William Paterson, Caleb Strong, William Few, William Maclay, Paine Wingate and Richard Henry Lee were appointed to a Senate committee to bring in a bill for organizing the judiciary of the United States.

"Of the seven members, the first four were lawyers who had served in the so-called Constitutional Convention. Those four lawyers along with Paine Wingate, an ardent Federalist, dominated the Committee. The bill passed by the Committee and submitted to the Senate and House consisted of thirty-five Sections containing about 8,500 words, which nearly doubled the 4,543 words contained in the Constitution. This wasn't really a bill that could be signed into law; it was really an amendment to the Constitution, which created the Supreme and inferior courts.

"The Act also created the office of Attorney General as well as a U.S. Attorney in each judicial district. The creation of the last two offices was for the purpose of establishing adversarial proceedings in the federal courts. Such proceedings were incapable of being implemented under the existing Constitution because when it was ratified in 1788, the Constitution only provided hearing Courts incapable of conducting adversarial proceedings.

"Why should the American people have to submit to adversarial proceedings under which they would be forced to hire lawyers for their own defense? The adversarial system was terribly abused in the colonies under english rule. . .

"Nineteen Congressmen and Senators, who had previously been members of the Constitutional Convention were serving in the First Congress. Under the leadership of Ellsworth in the Senate and Madison in the House, those former members had agreed many of the constitutional changes made in their plan to create the federal courts would never be approved by the people or the states.

As a diversionary tactic, the Bill of Rights were introduced at about the same time. The Bill of Rights quickly consumed the interest of the people. This gave President Washington the opportunity to quietly sign the First Judiciary Act into law. That Act in reality was a multitude of amendments to the Constitution, as you will be shown." 

The First Judiciary Act of 1789 could be said, then, to have become part and parcel to the Constitution -- like an unconstitutional amendment - for that act did indeed establish the court system to their satisfaction and for their own nefarious purposes. Today the court system does not bring "justice", and as we can plainly see, the myriad laws, rules, regulations, statutes, and the infamous "case-law" is modeled after the Talmud.

We might ask before we leave off here, just why America was founded in the first place, and by whom? It has been asserted that America was founded to bring in the New World Order; when the plan is far enough along, Americans will be brought to their knees and America will be destroyed.

"Destroyed" doesn't necessarily mean the land itself will be devastated, because it appears this beautiful land is being readied as a playground for the elite. They are simply, slowly and surely, destroying the very fabric of our nation -- morals, integrity, honor, love, compassion, along with the economy -- while killing off the young, healthy, white males and females through their neverendingwar on terror.

If this continues, within a generation only the old, infirm and mind-controlled youth will be alive. They will then send the old and infirm 'elsewhere', saving the mind-controlled youth to serve the 'masters'. As a matter of fact -- regarding the mind-controlled youth -- that has been decided and explicitly stated in Protocol No. 15:

"We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order.

"But when we are in power we shall remove every kind of disturbing subject from the course of education and shall make out of the youth obedient children of authority, loving him who rules as the support and hope of peace and quiet."  

Their 'playground' is being prepared by way of environmental and ecological regulations; the Wildlands Project (rewilding America by re-introducing wild animals, poisonous snakes, etc. into areas heretofore abandoned by those species.

In rural Pennsylvania the Game Commission has introduced mountain lions and timber wolves, denying their culpability whenever questioned, allegedly even lying to our state rep, Matt Baker, who claims he's asked.); Rural Cleansing (removing people from the rural areas into the cities by destroying the farmers under insidious and unconstitutional 'trade agreements' (NAFTA/GATT/WTO); creation of watersheds (a back-door approach to regionalization); habitat areas where man may not tread, and so forth.

That is not to say Weapons of Mass Destruction -- including nuclear detonations -- would be out of the question if enough Americans awakened and became actively involved to a point where it appeared the plan was going to falter.

As we know though, the best laid plans of mice and men very often go astray.

Why?

Because with God/Creator, ALL things are possible.

Before we delve into the Noachide Laws, it seems imperative here to take a look into the past, at the early history of the Jews in America, (as told by the Jews themselves) and the beginnings of their power and influence in commerce, education, religion, the press and government, possibly even how and why the Articles of Confederations were discarded in favor of the Constitution.

It is fitting that we should do this, since that past has brought us to our present dilemma. You will read an excerpt of a speech by Woodrow Wilson who claimed that in the 'essence and spirit of our Constitution, the influence of the Hebrew Commonwealth was paramount' because it was "in itself a divine precedent for a pure democracy".

We'll turn to a book titled America and Palestine, published in 1944 by the American Zionist Emergency Council, Prepared and Edited by Reuben Finkh.  In the introduction the author tells of a previous project he undertook for the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA): that of obtaining "written expressions of opinion of the Members of Congress" relating to the Zionist movement. The results were published in 1919 by the the ZOA under the title, The American War Congress and Zionism.

Finkh says that 1919 publication had the effect of "strengthening the influence and of enlarging the scope of Zionism in the U.S.".

In America and Palestine, Finkh boasts that the book reprints written opinions and speeches made by 77 of 96 Senators (86%) and 318 of 435 Representatives (75%) including "the 6 Senators and 10 Representatives whose statements are not included but who are members of the pro-Zionist American Palestine Committee [Jews]", all offering support and encouragement of the Zionist movement [that is, ejecting Palestinians from their homes and the land that was their home for thirteen centuries so the Asiatic Turko-Mongolian Khazars -- who call themselves Jews and 'Semites' -- could move in, lock, stock and (gun) barrel]. Finkh said:

"As a Jew and a Zionist I felt a warming sensation of joy and encouragement as I was scrutinizing and studying these sincere expressions of interest and sympathy by so many non-Jewish Americans."

He claims in Chapter 1 that:

"The list of the distinguished Presidents of the United States who showed an interest in the cause of Jewish National Restoration goes back to John Adams, the second President of this Republic."

Finkh states further that:

"Moreover, sympathy for Zionism in America is not confined to official spheres. With relatively few exceptions, the public press of the country, its pulpit, its educational institutions, its industrial and labor leadership, have generously upheld the rights of the jews to their ancient Homeland."

Notice the labor 'leadership' is mentioned, NOT the laborers themselves. The source of labor unions is traceable right back to the Jews again, i.e. from Jewish Contributions To Civilization, the Jewish Publication Society of America 5706 - 1945, - An Estimate by Joseph Jacobs , we read on page 306 that:

"Socialism was originated by Jews: and today Jews play a leading role in the spread and interpretation. And under the leadership of a Jew, trades unionism has been brought to its highest point of efficiency."

That was written more than 55 years ago. Today we see an even higher 'point of efficiency' by labor leaders, many of them merely minions of their masters. . . useful idiots. America has never before been referred to as "homeland", I cannot but wonder: whose is this homeland the Department of Homeland Security is "securing", and for what nefarious purpose? Continuing with Finkh's statements (be sure to read between the lines):

"When one reflects on the reasons underlying the consistent American manifestation of friendship to the Jewish people's aspirations, one is inevitably led to the conclusion that this attitude cannot be a passing whim dictated by motives of a transitory nature. It may justly be said to constitute a well-defined national policy, the roots of which are discernible in the early history of the settlements in the New World.
"By some curious dispensation of fate the Jews from the beginning have been peculiarly connected with America."

The use of the word 'fate' here is surely an intentional misnomer. The plan for World Dominion has been meticulously plotted throughout the centuries, and it appears that behind the scenes the New World (America) was a carefully planned melting pot of races and cultures to create the vehicle which would bring in the New Age / New World Order / under their "King Despot of the Blood of Zion" (also referred to as the "Pope of the world".)

America had to be a melting pot in order to provide a place for the Jews to hide among the 'minorities'. It was said that in Europe the people of the Nordic race were so distinct from 'foreigners' who entered their countries that there was literally no place for the tribal descendants of the Khazars to hide. As we've said, the 'hate crime' bills being passed today, ostensibly to protect minorities, are in fact slated to put a stop once and for all to any discussion whatsoever of the "Jewish Question".

U.S. Senator, Rick Santorum, (so-called 'Christian-Conservative'; Penn.) was sponsoring a proposed bill this year that would withhold 'government funding' from colleges that spoke negatively -- or even allowed negative comments -- about Israel!!! They become more and more arrogant as their plan gains momentum with the help of stupid, deaf, blind, and unwitting supporters -- the Jewish lesser brethren, Judeo-Christians / Christian Zionists, and elected officials who are bribed, threatened and blackmailed into acquiescence.

Considering the influx into America directly after the successfully orchestrated 'Civil War', of millions of Eastern European Khazarian 'Jews' and the fact that Jews are not counted in the census, we have no idea today what their actual numbers are.  (There is no category either in race or religion for "Jew" on the census questionnaire.)

Further confounding the issue is their propensity to change their names to hide behind a 'gentile' mask until the time is right to come out of the closet. Several of them 'outed' during the Clinton era, including Hillary Rodham Clinton while running for U.S. Senator of New York, who discovered with shock that she was of Jewish heritage. That was around the time that Madeline Albright and General Wesley Clark discovered they were Jews. Clark is currently in the running for Democratic candidate for president, and is from a five-generation line of rabbis.

Maybe, though, the revelations of their heritage were lies. Last evening (the same day the above paragraph was written) while reading The World Conquerers by Louis Marschalko, we found this:

"In the Roman Empire, especially in Rome, the power and influence of this nationalist tribal minority reached quite formidable dimensions. Cicero, the great Roman statesman, during the proceedings of a court action made his address to the court in such a subdued voice that he could only be heard by the judges. He explained the wisdom of acting in such a fashion by stating that Jewish solidarity constituted a force formidable enough to ruin anybody giving evidence against them.
"Throughout diaspora and from early times, the Jews possessed organisations akin to those we now know as masonic. They initiated certain influential Gentiles who were prepared to declare themselves to be half-Jewish and through whom they were able to establish their influence in the highest places in public life."

Returning to America and Israel, R. Finkh explains that the English Puritans who established themselves in the New World were intellectuals "whose luggage consisted of a system ardently Hebraic". They loved the Old Testament; America became "New Canaan" and many of the towns and cities were given Hebrew names such as Salem, Selah, Zion, Jericho, etc.  Many of the Hebrew-loving intellectuals were "distinguished Hebrew scholars", such as Governor Bradford of the Plymouth Colony.

Finkh mentions that "the first book of importance printed in English in America" was "issued in 1640 by the Cambridge Press and consists of an original metrical translation of the Psalms made directly from the Hebrew text by Puritans in the wilderness of New England." He continues:

"When Harvard College was founded in 1636, Hebrew was one of the compulsory subjects and no scholar could be admitted for a degree unless he was able to translate the hebrew original of the Bible into Latin.
"The first graduating class at Harvard, in 1642, offered three theses on Hebrew subjects.

"Yale college, organized in 1701, took as the insignia on its shield the Hebrew words [here the characters were reproduced, translated 'Urim V'thummim'] which still adorn its portals."

A footnote states that the Hebrew characters are "Symbols of the Sacred Oracle which were part of the equipment of the Israelite Chief Priest".  

The Israelite Chief Priest was a Pharisee of which Jesus said: "Ye are of your father the Devil, a liar and a murderer". It appears the early Colonists were already steeped in Talmudism. The question is: why did they called themselves "Christians".

"Jewish Biblical teachings had thus, to a large extent, shaped the development of the self-governing institutions, the introduction of religious freedom, and the evolution of the legal codes of the thirteen original Colonies. Its full force came to the fore in those decisive years of intellectual advancement in America which preceded the War of Independence."

Excerpting from an address by Woodrow Wilson on May 7, 1911, titled "The Bible and Progress", Finkh quotes Wilson:

"Recalling the previous experiences of the colonists in applying the Mosaic Code to the order of their internal lives, it is not to be wondered at that the various passages in the Bible. . . held up before the pioneer Americans the Hebrew Commonwealth as a model government.
"In the spirit and essence of our constitution, the influence of the Hebrew Commonwealth was paramount in that it was not only the highest authority for the principle, 'that rebellion to Tyrants is obedience to God', but also because it was in itself a divine precedent for a pure democracy. . ."

As an aside, for the purpose of using an example of how they gain control: Wilson was entirely controlled by the Talmudic Zionists, beginning with Samuel Untermeyer, who blackmailed Wilson into allowing him (Untermeyer) to choose the next Supreme Court judge when a seat was vacated.

Briefly: it is said that while President of Princeton University, Wilson had an affair with the wife of a colleague. After a divorce from that husband she had remarried and it seems her son-in-law was in need of money. She threatened to sue Wilson for 'breach-of-promise' and apparently had many letters from him during the time of their affair. Untermeyer was instrumental -- both by virtue of his political influence and large donations -- in getting Wilson elected. Wouldn't you know, Untermeyer became 'legal counsel' to Wilson's former paramour.

After helping him get elected to the presidency, Untermeyer approached Wilson with the woman's demands -- $40,000 or she would expose their secret and make the letters public. Wilson didn't have $40,000. Untermeyer 'generously' offered to pay the bribe in return for the right to choose the next U.S. Supreme Court Justice, that being Louis Brandeis -- a Jew. Incidentally, Untermeyer assured Wilson that he would keep the letters so the woman could pose no further threat. Of course, that gave untold powers to the holder of the letters, further empowering the Talmudic influence in government and into the Supreme Court.

We can use our imagination here, go behind the scenes and follow the probable chain of events. Wilson was 'selected' as a presidential candidate because he was a vain and greedy man with a secret past. It was said he was like molding clay in the hands of those who stroked his ego and lavished him with luxurious perks, and to top it off -- they held a hammer over his head by way of the damning 'love letters'. I can take this a step further and imagine Untermeyer going so far as approaching the woman and offering the plan. It would be an unlikely coincidence that she would have gone looking for that particular lawyer, and it's certain Wilson's activities, both past and current, were scrutinized by his benefactors before they decided upon him to fill the office of president.

The plan to choose politicians who have 'skeletons in their closets' is explained in Protocol No. 8:

"For a time, until there will no longer be any risk in entrusting responsible posts in our States to our brother-Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons whose past and reputation are such that between them and the people lies an abyss, persons who, in case of disobedience to our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear -- this in order to make them defend our interests to their last gasp."

Wilson's last gasp was an admission of his guilt. It has been written that on his death bed his lamentation was:

"I have unwittingly destroyed my country."

Returning again to America and Palestine:  Finkh quotes Lyman Abbot, author of Life and Literature of the Ancient Hebrews, 1901:

"It is not necessary here to consider whether those scholars are correct who trace the excellencies of the Roman law back through the Greeks to the Hebrew people.

"It is certain that Alfred the Great found in the Hebrew writings the principles which he made the foundations of the English constitution: that those principles were inculcated and impressed by the Reformers on their followers, with an insistence which made the Reformation a political as well as an ecclesiastical emancipation; and that from the same fountain source the Puritans drew the political ideals. . . which they transplanted across the sea to incorporate in the Constitution of the American Republic.

"If we did but know it, every legislative hall, every court house, every public school room, every Christian church, to say nothing of less visible and tangible manifestations of our national life and temper, are monuments of our indebtedness to this ancient people."

". . . manifestations of our national life", ". . . monuments of our indebtedness to this ancient people" -- the Talmudic Zionist Jews who admit to being atheists. The thought had occurred to me several years ago that the "Reformers" were possibly controlled opposition. It has been written in several books that Calvin's real name was Cohen. Here are a few more excerpts by Finkh that brings the picture into clearer focus regarding the Jewish influence on commerce in the colonies, along with its influence on religion, education, laws and courts:

"The physical connection of the Jews with America began very early. In the case of South and Central America it antedated the landing of the Pilgrim Fathers, although it is nevertheless a matter of record that by the middle of the 17th century Jews were known to have established themselves in the various Colonies of the North. Gradually they made their way to all of the original thirteen Colonies, their leading settlement having been established in Newport, Rhode Island.
"The newly arrived Jews lent labor, skill and enterprise toward the physical and economic upbuilding of the new settlements in America.

Excerpts from C. E. Russell's Hyam Solomon, 1924 as quoted by Finkh state that:

"There can be no doubts now that the Jews were an incalculable asset to the young colonists. . . What was imperatively demanded in those venturing settlements was quick and widening communications. The Jews came with exact knowledge of commerce and the skill and experience to prosecute it.

Pioneer settlers, intent upon clearing forests and struggling with savages, lacked such equipment. In every seaboard town, it was the Jewish element that, with capital and enterprise, with wisdom and daring, forwarded business."

Reuben Finkh further states that the Jews':

". . . were chiefly engaged in inter-colonial and English trade. Some of the Jewish traders of Newport and Philadelphia were among the largest ship owners in America".  

A reasonable question at this point is, again: For whom and for what purpose was America settled by predominately white Europeans?  

It is interesting to notice that the real pioneers who performed the back-breaking labor in settling this American "Homeland" were predominately white Europeans, while the Jews influenced religion, government, laws, education, the press and established themselves in commerce. We can imagine they lived comfortably and in luxury, while the settlers (many of them were paid to leave their homes in Europe) risked their lives sailing across the ocean to an unsettled land to face daily hardships not to mention the ultimate price: physical death.  

Today -- now -- we find ourselves facing the perils of totalitarian oppression as a result of the past two-hundred years of slowly, insidiously-advancing Talmudic law and our related subject at hand: that of the Noahide Laws and how they intend to be forced -- and enforced under threat of decapitation -- upon the Gentile population in America. We have already seen how we've come under control of the Talmudic laws through that U.S. Supreme Court and the laws being promulgated by federal, state and local elected officials.

Be assured that those laws emanate directly from the United Nations, the cloned child of the League of Nations, a.k.a. League to Enforce (their brand of) Peace, which -- as you will recall -- is "a Jewish idea", as Nahum Sokolow stated at the Carlsbad Congress on 8-24-1922.  

Although the power in the U.N. appears to be the U.S. Government, be assured the power is emanating from the criminal government of Israel along with their henchmen who sit in high places in the U.S. The Israeli (Talmudic Zionist Jew) power/control factor of the U.N. has become more obvious and closer to 'home' as we see from the headline of an article in the New York Post, 1-9-02, that reads: "Israeli-backed Firm Buys UN Plaza". More on Israel later. 

Returning to the point that the Talmud has taken precedence over the Constitution: When the U.S. Supreme Court recognizes the Talmudic Law as basis for a legal brief the Talmud has been given precedence OVER the Constitution!!!

THAT is why amoral and demoralizing and destructive pornographic literature, websites, movies and television programs -- not to mention sex 'education' in government schools that teaches our babies homosexuality is normal and healthy, and sex with animals is okay if the animal is clean and you don't hurt the animal -- all are becoming 'legally acceptable' in today's America. Where ever the Talmudists have gained control, the morals of the nation were destroyed before the final destruction occurred.

The Talmud is taking precedence over the Constitution, and as you've seen, the Talmud is a nasty, nasty piece of work.

(For our readers who have internet access, many of the Talmudic quotes in the preceding sections can be verified on the internet at www.come-and-hear.com. Carol Valentine has scanned several tractates (books) from the 1960's non-copyrighted, version of the Soncino Talmud onto the pages. That version is universally accepted and authorized by the Pharisees/Rabbis today.)

When Germany was governed under the Weimar Republic Jews were in control of the government, the courts, the press, education, entertainment, and the economy. My, doesn't that sound familiar? Just as they gained control early on in America.

They devastated the economy, creating the worst depression the country had ever known (just like they're doing today in America and the whole world). Under their control, German society had reached the depths of moral degradation and deprivation. As an example, we'll quote from a chapter in Nesta Webster's Germany and England (1938). You'll think you're reading about America today.

[We have not abandoned the Noahide Laws. This fore and background is being given in hopes our reader will ingest the facts to be presented as though they were the main course of the 'last supper'.]

And before you gasp with shock that Adolf Hitler is not being vilified as has been done for the past sixty years until present, recall the lies that have been uncovered thus far in your reading; lay aside the inculcated belief that "Hitler was the devil incarnate" as I believed all of my life, for we've barely passed out of first grade on our journey out of the lies into which we were born.

Nesta Webster was a respected historian whose books most of us knew nothing about because they are not (and to my knowledge, never were) available in the Zionist-controlled book stores.]

The following excerpts are from Germany and England, Chapter V, titled "Hitler";

     "Before the War [WWI] they [Jews] had again and again expressed all their passionate loyalty to Germany as the one country on which all their hopes were set.
     "For although despised and hated, they were able to make money in a country where, as Hitler says, "gold was a god" to a larger extent than in any other except perhaps the United States.
     "They were also allowed to occupy positions in the learned and professional classes out of all proportion to those held by Germans. Though largely barred by society, they were encouraged by the Hohenzollerns, who had always believed in making use of them, from Frederick the Great with his münzenjude to Wilhelm II with his Rathenau at the end of a private telephone wire.
     "It was thus that during the War so many of the Jews in this country [England] hoped for the final victory of Germany and provided some of her most useful spies and informers. . .
     "But in the main, it was Russia that the Jews -- including those in England -- regarded as their principal enemy, and it was out of hatred for Russia that they sided with Germany against the Allies.
     "After Russia had been brought low and a hideous revenge taken on her by the predominantly Jewish Bolsheviks, and the Kaiser had been got rid of, the Jews started Bolshevising Germany, and having got her almost completely under their control they remained pro-German until the rise of Hitler.
     "It was then that the whole Jewish power was turned against Germany.
     "The Jews had not minded a certain amount of persecution, which after all mainly affected the humbler classes of their race, as long as they were given power in the State. But this is precisely what Hitler took from them, hence largely the cry of persecution.

     "Hitler himself had been slow to adopt an attitude of anti-Semitism.

     "As he relates in Mein Kampf, he was at first revolted by the hostility shown towards the Jews which he encountered in Austria and attributed to their religion:
“As I thought they were persecuted on that account, my aversion to remarks in their disfavour almost grew into abhorrence. . .

"I considered that tone, especially that adopted by the anti-Semitic Press of Vienna, unworthy of cultural traditions of a great nation.”

    "But by degrees he came to the conclusion that “the Jewish religion” was really a misnomer:

“Through his own original being the Jew cannot possess any form of idealism, and therewith belief in the Hereafter is completely foreign to him. One cannot however imagine a religion according to the Aryan conceptions in which the conviction of life after death in some form is lacking.”

     "This statement entirely accords with those made to me by two Jews, quite independently of each other, who assured me with deep regret that the Jews of Western Europe rarely believe in God or the immorality of the soul; their outlook is entirely material.

     "For this reason it is not surprising that -- Karl Marx having declared that 'religion is the opium of the people' -- Jews should, as Hitler further observed, have become the chief propagandists of Marxism: 'that world pestilence'.

     "He saw them, too, as the oppressors of the working-classes and at the same time the agitators who stir them to revolt. He realised 'their glibness' and 'their artfulness in lying' on which Martin Luther in his treatise “Von den Juden and ihren Lügen” (Concerning the Jews and their Lies) had expressed himself with far greater violence some four hundred years earlier.

     "Above all, Hitler saw the fear they are able to inspire in order to drive all rivals or opponents off the field:
“Anyone with intelligence enough to resist the Jewish lure is broken by intimidation, however determined and intelligent he may be.”
     Mein Kampf is really an amazing book when one considers that it was written by a young soldier with little education, most of whose life had been spent in the direst poverty or in the trenches. Hitler writes in no spirit of Jew-baiting but as a bacteriologist calmly examining through his microscope the action of certain noxious bacilli on the human body.
     "He observes the influence exercised by the Jews in the world of art; he sees them as:
“the inspired creators of those hideous inventions for the cinema and the theatre,” of: “those unclean products of artistic life as given to the people.”
“It was pestilence, spiritual pestilence, worse than the Black Death, with which the nation was being inoculated”

"– especially the youth of Germany.

“Anyone who has not lost the capacity for entering into the souls of the young will realize that it must lead to their grave injury.” . . .  

     "In his strictures on pre-Nazi Germany, Hitler is undeniably justified; it was a matter of common knowledge just before and after the War that Berlin became a center of iniquity, its night life worse in some respects than that of Paris; vice of an unspeakable kind was flaunted with impunity, nude midnight orgies took place in the West End of the city – a cult that may in fact be said to have originated in Germany; the Jugendbewegung, chaotic and uncontrolled, encouraged license among the young; filthy and blasphemous books poured forth from the German Press.

     "Whether Hitler is right in attributing all this to the Jews we cannot tell; there are depraved elements of every nation which need no inciting to vice.

     "The fact remains, however, that since Hitler started to purge town life in Germany, pornographic books and pictures have disappeared from the shops, the Youth movements have become clean and healthy, the cult of nudity has been suppressed. And all this has coincided with the expulsion or voluntary departure of a number of Jews from Germany – not of Jews in the mass, since thousands still live there in peace, but without the power to influence the public mind which they formerly enjoyed.

     "Once-Christian England, in welcoming Jewish refugees indiscriminately to her shores, shows surprisingly little concern for the effect some of them may have on the minds and morals of her people, especially on the youth of the country.
     "We cannot help, moreover, noting, since this influx began, the change that has come over our Press; a once decent popular paper has boomed the nudity movement; another, which a few years ago could have been safely placed in the hands of a child, publishes matter exalting immorality and sneering at virtue; cartoons by artists not of British race, vulgar and not in the least funny, designed to create bad blood between classes and nations, are published with impunity.
     "Meanwhile the view of those to whom all these things are hateful, of those who crave to see their country restored to its former greatness as a beacon shedding the light of truth and justice on the world, are denied a hearing.
     "If this is the 'liberty of the Press' enjoyed under 'democracy', I should prefer the censorship of the Dictators.  

Mrs. Webster's final statement there gives one cause to pause. . . and ponder the thought. When this type of contradictory information about Germany under National Socialism first came into the light, it was very confusing to say the least. However, the information has been confirmed by many suppressed authors and expanded upon in personal conversations I have had with people who lived in Germany under Adolf Hitler's rule. He was not the Devil incarnate; on the contrary, his love for Germany and her people was made manifest time and again.

The nagging piece of that puzzle that wouldn't resolve itself was the fact that: "Hitler was a dictator!"

Perhaps the resolution in my mind is merely a justification as to "why" a national leader -- hated by the world for decades and whom I have come to respect over the past several years by reading dozens of suppressed books -- became a dictator, rather than merely a 'president'.

When Adolf Hitler was running for office there were over a hundred political parties in Germany; all of them (according to Hans Schmidt, in his book End Times, End Games) were Communist/Bolshevik front groups. It just happens that the majority of the Russian Communist/Bolsheviks were Jews, so admitted in their own literature and Jewish Encyclopedias.

Agents provocateur from the fledgling Soviet Union infiltrated Germany during the first World War and sabotaged the war effort, going so far as inciting strikes in the munitions plants -- during a war! When we see the power and control they assumed in the Weimar Republic, and the devastation they created, it would seem impossible that a 'president' could keep them out of government offices. A dictator could -- and did -- do just that. He also ejected them from other positions of power and influence. And he ejected the money-lenders from their places of control over the German economy.

It is a matter of history (certainly not history that's taught in schools and universities) that during those years, before Germany was forced into the planned second World War, the nation and the people thrived under National Socialism, in all aspects of their lives.

In her book Mrs. Webster stated that (in 1938) the German government was openly anti-Semitic, and Germany was thriving. At the same time, she said, England was being secretly ruled and destroyed from within by the powerful cabal that had grabbed hold the reins of the British government, the press, education, etc.

[The word itself "anti-Semitism" is a misnomer and should be remembered whenever we read or hear it. The word was brought into usage by the creatures themselves as a powerful tool whenever there was an exerted effort against their power, influence and manipulation. As Douglas Reed writes:

"During the 19th Century (as Dr. Kastein again records), the term 'antisemitism; was born. As 'persecution' could no longer be said to exist some new word had to be found, capable of intimidating Gentiles and terrifying Jews, the second purpose being more important that the first, and 'antisemitism was invented.
"'Abracadabra' might have served as well, for the term 'antisemitism' is patently absurd in relation to people who are demonstrably not Semites and whose Law commands the extirpation of Semites (the Arab peoples of Palestine). Any expression of sympathy with the Semitic Arabs, expelled from their native land by the Zionist intruders in 1948, in time came to be attacked as "antisemitism.
"Presumably the authors of this term desired to keep such words as Jew, Jewish and anti-Jewish out of the public controversy and counted on intimidating the mass-mind by the introduction of an obscurantist word.

"What the dominant sect meant by 'antisemitism' was in fact a combination of lese majesty (offences against the dignity of the sovereign power) and heresy (opposition to the paramount religious doctrine); and by the middle of the present century the mass-mind had to a great extent submitted to this idea. . .

"The word 'antisemitism' was coined at the time when 'men of Jewish race' as Disraeli and Bakunin pointed out, took over the direction of the world-revolution, and the main object of its invention was by intimidation to deter public discussion of that remarkable development; the events of the present century have abundantly proved that, as this book will show.

"In the recent time, a Jewish authority, Mr. Bernard Lazare, offered a definition of 'antisemitism' in a book which bore the word as its title. This definition had nothing whatever to do with the prophet Shem and his tribe, with Semitic blood or speech or stock, or with anything Semitic whatsoever; Mr. lazare related 'antisemitism' entirely to an adverse opinion of the Jewish role in revolution. He wrote:

"This is what must separate the impartial historian from antisemitism. The antisemite says: 'The Jew is the preparer, the machinator, the chief engineer of revolutions'; the impartial historian confines himself to studying the part which the Jew -- considering his spirit, his character, the nature of his philosophy, and his religion -- may have taken in revolutionary processes and movements".
"What Mr. Lazare clearly meant was that nothing more than 'a part' in revolutionary processes might be attributed to Jews, and that a man who said that 'The Jew is the preparer, the machinator, the chief engineer of revolutions' committed les majesty and heresy.
"However, it is substantially what Disraeli said. . . :
"that mighty revolution. . . is developing entirely under the auspices of the Jews",
"the influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle",
"men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them" (i.e., the secret societies).

Before we return to the Noahide Laws, let us see one more confirmation of the devastation wreaked by these bothersome and meddlesome creatures when they gain control in a country. The sorrow and shame of it is that the 'lesser brethren' Jews along with Judeo-Christians have been instrumental in the destructive process due to the intense religious indoctrination of both Christianity and Talmudism upon the minds and souls of the hapless believers. Talmudism and Christianity are opposite ends of the poles, and are now -- in the minds of the masses -- inextricably entwined.

In his book, The Nameless War (1952), Captain A.H.M. Ramsay, a WWI veteran, former member of His Majesty's Scottish Guard and a member of the British Parliament gave a history of just some of the revolutions promulgated by them (they all were). Captain Ramsay was arrested and thrown into the Brixton Prison (without charges or a hearing) during a session of the Parliament, of which he was a member at the time. Why? Because he was attempting to expose the machinations of those meddlesome Jews who were fomenting the unnecessary war, a war that no one wanted, least of all Adolf Hitler. 

We'll excerpt from a chapter on the French Revolution in which he mentions the wickedness, debauchery and amoral atmosphere created in France which led the people to a blood lust and killing frenzy -- just as Nesta Webster related was occurring in Germany before Hitler became Chancellor, and just as is happening today in America.

From: The Nameless War, Chapter Two, "The French Revolution":

     By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.

     Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong secret organization covering the whole of France.

     Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under that again the Blue, or National, Masonry had operated until it was converted over-night into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d'Orleans in 1773. Little did Egalite (d'Orleans) suspect the satanic powers that he was invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were. The name Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were lit by that light.

     By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789, the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret organizations was complete.

     Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well advanced by then also.

     This was the manner of its accomplishment.

     By 1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.

     In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing over his palace, estates, and house (the Palais Royal) to his creditors, with powers to form there a centre of politics, printing, pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres, art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form of every variety of public debauchery.

     In fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property to install a colossal organism for publicity and corruption, which appealed to every lowest instinct in human nature; and deluged the enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and revolutionary output of its printing presses and debating clubs.

As Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood:

"It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city."

     It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the creditors at the Palais royal was one de Laclos, a political adventurer of alien origin, author of Liaisons Dangereuses, and other pornographic works, who was said "to study the politics of love because of his love for politics."

     This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and most unscrupulous nature upon any public characters whom the Jacobins thought likely to stand in their way. This process was known as "L'infamie." [end excerpt]   

Hopefully, the importance of understanding the seriousness of the Noahide Laws is clear by now. When we see that their aims to rule the world under Talmudic Law are already bearing fruit, via the U.S. Supreme Court and the Uniform Commercial Code; when we begin to comprehend the destructive, soul-damning nature of those who would rule over us, we had better sit up and take notice.

The Noahide Laws are part of the Talmud, and remember, the Talmud is the work of the Pharisaical Priesthood, according to which, only the non-Jews (goyim/gentiles) are to be subject under the Noahide Laws, as well as subjected to the punishment imposed for any transgressions under those laws.

We will now get to the meat of the questions at hand: what are the Noahide Laws; who will oversee their implementation; how would they affect the lives of all non-Jews on this planet? According to Louis Marschalko, in The World Conquerers the Noahide Laws spell death for all non-Jews who refuse to submit.  (emphasis is ours):

"Maimonides also admits that Christianity made the world familiar with the Old Testament, i.e. with Torah, but adds that its interpretation was erroneous and that the errors will be evident at the arrival of Jewry's political Messiah who, as leader of Jewry's armed power, will subjugate the non-Jewish nations of the world and will exterminate, together with their women and children, all those who refuse to accept the laws of Noah. (Jewry and Christianity, by Canon Lipot Huber, p. 141)

For many of you, this may be your introduction to the Noahide Laws, to the fact that they do exist and to the fact they are very real. Since these 'laws' have been written for the Gentile world one could reasonably consider that the Gentile world would have been made publicly aware of this fact.

We're discovering, though, that we no longer live in a reasonable nor sane world. In fact, mere words cannot accurately describe the breadth and depth of the darkness permeating this realm. It seems to have soaked into the very fiber of our being: into the minds, the thoughts, the language, the relationships, and most specifically the religious belief systems of the inhabitants of planet earth, as though both the planet and her inhabitants have been smothered by a "creeping crud" (to coin a phrase Steven Jacobson so aptly applied to what others have termed 'the matrix'.

My mind goes back to Jesus' words: "Ye are the light of the world"; and, "the Kingdom of God is within you". That light of the world within us IS the Light of God, the Love of God. Through our love and willingness to 'bear witness unto the truth', our Light so shines that others may 'see'. Darkness is after all merely the absence of light. Let us each choose to be that Light into the darkness.

Let us now look squarely at: the plan, the planners, and the planned genocide for those of us who would dare to resist becoming "Hasidic gentiles", their "Noachide children". These elaborate behind-the-scenes preparations have been made on our (Gentiles) behalf by the ancient Pharisaical/Rabbinical Talmudic priesthood.

According to the Pharisees, the Seven Noahide Laws were given to Adam and Noah before Moses received the first ten commandments, so in the beginning, all mankind was subject under them, although the Old Testament makes no mention whatsoever -- not even close -- to this event.

Then, Moses -- who possibly never existed, at least as the character portrayed by the priesthood in the Old Testament -- received from Jehovah the ten commandments, and subsequently the hundreds of statutes and laws applicable only to the 'chosen people'. Those are the six hundred thirteen statutes codified by Maimonides, as mentioned in a previous section.

The Noachide Laws were virtually unknown to most of us (and remain unknown by the majority of non-Jews) until we became aware of an innocent-appearing resolution passed by the U.S. Congress, signed by president George (Poppy) Bush on March 20, 1991 declaring the Noahide Laws to be the 'bedrock of our civilization' to which the world must return. It turns out that Jimmy Carter was the first president to sign the resolution, and every president since Carter has done the same.

The resolution, ostensibly passed to designate March 26, 1991 as "Education Day, U.S.A.", in fact has nothing whatsoever to do with education! As we shall see, it was in tribute to Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, revered leader of the world-wide Lubavitch movement. The Lubavitchers are dead serious about the establishment and enforcement -- for the goyim -- of these seriously deadly laws. Although Schneerson is now dead, many Jew believe him to be the Messiah and await his return.

Read carefully the words in this resolution. Then, when you discover how deadly serious the movers of this movement are, you might return and read it again. (all emphasis is ours):

Public Law 102-14

102d Congress

March 20, 1991

[H.J. Res 104]

Joint Resolution

To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A."

"Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;
"Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

[Note: Recall that these seven 'laws' are nowhere to be found in the Jew's Bible (Old Testament/Torah), nor in the Christian Bible (New Testament/Gospels); instead they were generated from the Pharisees, and are straight from the Babylonian Talmud - NOT from the 'dawn of civilization'.]

"Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;
"Whereas society is deeply concerned with the weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;
"Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;
"Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;
"Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;
"Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe", this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving", the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and
"Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state;

[Note: "other heads of state" would mean leaders of other nations. It is a possibility that proclamations such as this have been as silently and insidiously adopted by leaders of other nations. The Lubavitch movement IS world-wide, as we shall see.]

"Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that March 25, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as 'Education Day, U.S.A.'.
"The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
"Approved March 20, 1991."

We were never instructed as to how we should appropriately observe and celebrate the rebbe's birthday nor were the Noahide Laws, that became 'Public Law', itemized for us to see. Public laws such as this lay quietly in reserve awaiting the day they can be pulled out, dusted off and implemented to their fullest interpretation -- and beyond. You will see that the Seven Noahide Laws do indeed appear innocent at first reading without examining the full extent of their intended force.

In the July-August 1991 issue of The Gap, a newsletter published by the Noahide movement, Ernest Easterly, Professor of International Law at Southern University Law Center, made the following statement:

"With further recognition by other nations and international courts, the Seven Noahide Laws should become the cornerstone of a truly civilized international legal order."

Please read that again, considering what we've learned to this point; keep it in mind as you read following sections. Now, let's pause here for a moment to review the Old Testament/Torah story of the 'giving of the law' from Mount Sinai:

When Moses returned from the mountain with the stone tablets containing the commandments, he found the chosen people drunk, indulging in sexual orgies, and cavorting around a golden calf they had fashioned by melting the gold they had stolen from their Egyptian neighbors before their exodus. Moses got so mad he broke the tablets and had to go back up to get another set.

Moses wasn't mad about the stealing, he was mad because the chosen people were 'a whoring after other gods'. It's okay that they stole, because in fact as we discovered, Jehovah told them to.  Actually, he taught them that lying is okay, too because he said they should 'borrow jewels of silver and gold, and clothing', then, rather than returning what they borrowed, they should take it with them when they leave Egypt.

If you recall from an earlier section, just prior to the Exodus, Jehovah had told Moses for the umpteenth time that he was going to 'harden the Pharaoh's heart' so the Pharaoh wouldn't let his (Jehovah's) chosen people go. Ostensibly, he hardened the Pharaoh's heart so he could prove his power by calling down horrible plagues on the innocent Egyptians,

"that thou may knowest that there is none like me in all the earth."  ". . . and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth." Exodus 9:14,15.

Jehovah's last evil act -- as written by the Pharisaical Scribes, obviously meant to "shock and awe" the world -- was the heinous plague/curse on the innocent Egyptians, that "the first-born of every household" (except his chosen) had to die so the whole world would know that Jehovah/Jove was Lord of the World. At the same time, remember, he made Moses 'a god' too:

"And the Lord said unto Moses, See I have made thee a god to Pharoah; and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. . . .

Back to the rest of the story, relating to the giving of the laws: when Moses came back the second time with the commandments, the chosen people were very subdued and behaving themselves. Jehovah was pleased with them and told Moses to gather them together because he wanted to speak with them personally. The people were sore afraid to approach their angry god (even though he wasn't angry just then), so they told Moses to talk to god and tell them what god said.

The six hundred thirteen Mosaic Laws were allegedly mandated directly from Jehovah to Moses to the chosen people. They are called the Mosaic Laws, and "Christians" who embrace Christian or Israel Identity firmly believe their ancestors were the ones who received these laws. They believe they (the white man) are the chosen of Jehovah, and that Moses wrote those first five books even though he was dead long before it was ever set into print.

Whenever an Identity Christian (or Israel Identity, or Anglo Israel Christian) is asked to explain to whom Jehovah was referring when he said: "you will loan to nations and borrow from none" they quickly change the subject. They have no answer.

The Pharisees/Rabbis claim that those hundreds of statutes pertain only to the Jews because either 1) the goyim rejected them or 2) because the goyim weren't present when the laws were given, depending on which account one wishes to believe.  So, the Christians and Muslims are out of the loop of the Ten Commandments as well as the six hundred thirteen other laws, right into the noose (or the guillotine) of the Seven Noachide Laws.

According to the Lubavitchers, who earnestly prosylatize for converts, all non-Jews must not only accept and obey the seven Noahide Laws, we must become what they refer to as Hasidic Gentiles; we must embrace the Talmud, study the Torah and obey the sixty-six (thus far) additional laws that have been created within the Seven.

Jews who have wondered why their Messiah has never appeared after all these three-thousand years have passed, are told it is because "the world is not yet ready for him".

When will the world be ready? When all non-Jews of the world have embraced the religion of the Pharisees and are primed to lovingly welcome their 'King Despot of the Blood of Zion' -- the Talmudic Messiah.

Following is a summary of the Seven Noachide Laws (actually there are only six laws, number 7 mandating the establishment of courts to enforce the other six) from the Institute of Judaic-Christian Researcher, Jan. 1992: The Talmud, Sanh. 56a-59b; Yad Melakhim 8:10, 9, 10; Jewish Encyclopedia; Encyclopedia Judaica:

1) Thou shalt not engage in idol worship. (According to the Talmud, all Christian churches are places of idolatry; all non-Jews are idolaters. Wearing a cross, having a picture rendering an artist's likeness of Jesus, speaking the name of Jesus, or anything that smacks of Christianity would be a crime, punishable by death.)  

2) Thou shalt not blaspheme God. (Muslims and Christians are considered blasphemers and idolaters, to be put to death. Atheists are okay for now. It seems Jehovah would prefer we believe in no god, rather than 'whore after other gods')

3) Thou shalt not shed innocent blood of any human nor fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live. (According to the Talmud, this law does not apply to Jews shedding of gentile blood, because 'only Jews are human'. Non-Jews are as beasts.) 

4) Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous or homosexual relations nor commit the act of rape.  (This does not apply to Jews, except with another Jew. It is permissible for the Jew to have sex with a boy Jew under 9 years and 1 day old, though, because he is not considered to be a man until that age; or a girl Jew baby under 3 years of age, because her hyman will grow back.)

5) Thou shalt not steal. (Does not apply to Jews. . . except, they may not steal from another Jew.)

6)  Thou shalt not be cruel to animals.  (Cruelty to animals was earlier defined as 'eating of flesh torn from a live animal'. However, one of the sixty-six sub-laws allows for burnt offerings -- again!)

7) Thou shalt establish laws and courts of law to administer [enforce] these laws, including the death penalty. (The death sentence is the only punishment and that is 'death by decapitation').

Regarding Law number seven, read this  from the Lubavitcher's "Noah's Covenant" website dealing with the Noahide Laws.

"G-d intends for us to live in harmony with each other and with the rest of His creation. In order to ensure that all our efforts are channeled in a positive, constructive direction, He established a set of laws by which we are to live our lives. Unfortunately, there are those that selfishly choose to rebel against G-d and work toward destructive ends.

"Without having a means to enforce the Laws, we would be unable to maintain social order and provide for the good of humanity. Therefore, the existence of courts of justice is necessary to enforce G-d's commandments. . .

"While we are currently unable to establish such courts to enforce the Seven Laws, we can meanwhile accomplish this mitzvah by teaching others of the Laws. Only when people have this knowledge can they act to fulfill their role in G-d's plan for creation."

Don't be fooled by the "while we are currently unable to establish such courts. . ." statement, and be clear that it will be Talmudic judges deciding our fate. As we've already discovered, today's 'courts of justice', including the U.S. Supreme Court, have all but dropped the Constitution in favor of Talmudic law. You will recall the fact that law schools have established special departments to teach aspiring lawyers the nuances of Talmudic law.

More recently an item in the Jerusalem Post - November 9, 2002 - announced that a Jewish law institute was launched in Washington, D.C. In fact, it stated in part that:

"Jewish legal experts have created a new institute that will educate jurists [judges] and others about 2,000 years of Jewish law and promote the application of the teachings to contemporary legal disputes and other modern-day issues.
"The launch of the Washington-based National Institute for Judaic Law was marked Tuesday night with a kosher dinner at the Supreme Court attended by 200 people, including three Supreme Court Justices - Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia.
"US President George W. Bush sent greetings and applauded the institute for promoting an 'understanding of Judaism's rich tradition of legal thought'. Bush wrote:
"As we face new challenges and welcome new opportunities, our society must continue to promote good character and strong values. Through the study and teaching of Jewish law and philosophy you are contributing to a growing culture of service, citizenship, and responsibility in America".

"Continue to promote good character and strong values. . ." Let's see what the Protocols say about that. This first from Protocol No. 9 is a repeat:

"We have got out hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press [media], into the liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the corner-stones of a free existence.

"We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated."

Then, from Protocol No. 14:

"In countries known as progressive and enlightened we have created a senseless, filthy, abominable literature. . .

"Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the goyim, will compose speeches, projects. memoirs, articles, which will be used by us to influence the minds of the goyim, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us."

So much for allegedly promoting "good character and strong values", yes? Back to the article on the National Institute for Judaic Law.

"[U.S. Supreme Court Justice] Scalia, in a letter to the institute's founder, Noson Gurary, wrote that "Jewish law is certainly one of the oldest and most highly developed systems" and explained why the comparative study of legal traditions was beneficial.
"The idea is to make Jewish law more accessible to everyone", said Washington lawyer Alyza Lewin. Both Lewin and her father Nathan Lewin are helping establish the institute. . .
"Last year, Alyza Lewin filed a brief to the Supreme Court based on the Talmud's take on capital punishment when the court was readying to hear a case on the constitutionality of the electric chair."

If the name "Lewin" has lost its familiar ring to your ears, recall that the news report regarding the Talmudic brief presented to the Supreme Court stated that it was Nathan Lewin (not his daughter Alyza) along with Menachem Elon, the former Israeli Supreme Court Justice, who presented the Talmudic brief to the U.S. Supremes.

So now, the capitol of this nation hosts a National Institute for Judaic Law. It is TALMUDIC LAW, folks, not 'Judaic law'. Under that law the judges rule, going way beyond 'interpretation' of the law: today the judges are making law -- legislating -- from the bench. Let us turn once again to the Protocols to be assured that this was all very carefully planned as it is being carried out by 'their' judges:

"While preaching liberalism to the goyim we at the same time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioning submission.
"Under our influence the execution of the laws of the goyim has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere.

"In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions judges decide as we dictate to them, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the goyim, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have anything in common with them -- by newspaper opinion or by other means.

". . . he who wishes to keep his place will have to give blind obedience to deserve it." Protocol No 15  

You must follow this last item from the JHG-USA website closely and with all of your faculties honed, because it sums up the purpose of this entire subject: to drive home the FACT that if the priestly Plan for World Dominion succeeds, Gentiles will be allowed to exist ONLY "to serve and help the Jewish people"!!!

The 'Rebbe' mentioned refers to Menachem Mendel Schneerson and all emphasis is ours. Remember: a Hasidic Gentile is a non-Jew who embraces Talmudism, forsaking Christianity or Islam or any other religious doctrine. . . or else! Else what? Off with your head, that's what!

Jews and Hasidic Gentiles — United to Save America

presents

The Noah's Covenant Web Site

The Rebbe has forcefully insisted that this opportunity is now within our immediate reach:

How Do We Bring the Jews Home?

Ask the Gentiles for Help

by Bryan J. Ellison

"One of the 613 mitzvos commands all Jews to teach the gentile nations their Seven Noachide Laws (Sefer Hamitzvos, positive #3). This is a Torah obligation binding on all men and women over the age of bar or bas mitzvah, without which a Jew's service to Hashem is incomplete.

"Even in the future, the nations will continue to exist, to serve and help the Jewish people. . .

This, then, is our lesson — to increase our activities in the areas where the many will be influenced: Jews, the world, and the nations" (Shabbos Parshas Vayeishev, 21 Kislev, 5745).

"Already in 1977, the Rebbe was emphasizing that part of a Jew's total service is for the purpose of influencing the gentile nations, so that they will be transformed from a source of opposition into a vast reservoir of physical strength to assist Jewish service.

Would that be the forty million "Christian Zionists" who cry "ISRAEL FOREVER!". . . and "ISRAEL, WE LOVE YOU!!", whose churches are now teaching the religion of the Jews? Taking the Seder Meal (Passover) at the Jewish Synagogues? U.S. Soldiers killing and dying in the middle east to increase the territory for Israel? Check out Protocol No. 7:  

"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us then we must offer resistance by a universal war."

Saddam Hussein attempted to create a pan-Arab coalition to defend against Israel, the only nation in the middle east that has stockpiled Weapons of Mass Destruction, including a nuclear arsenal. Iraq is a very close neighbor to Israel, and has now been crushed.  How? by using the goyim as a "vast reservoir of physical strength to assist Jewish service".

This particular protocol continues in that vein, and spells out their plan clearly. They pull no punches:

"The principal factor of success in the political is the secrecy of its undertakings: the word should not agree with the deeds of the diplomat.

That's right! And that is undoubtedly why Jesus said: "by their fruits ye shall know them" Protocol No. 7 continues:

"We must compel the government of the goyim to take action in the direction favoured by our widely-conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly prompted by us through the means of that so-called "Great Power" -- the Press, which, with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands.

"In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of America or China or Japan."

The Protocols in this format were written a hundred years ago. Today the word 'press' would take in all forms of media, for the brain-washing is incorporated into not only the 'news', but also in sitcoms, documentaries, music, novels, movies and most especially the so-called 'churches'. Continuing with the writing from JHG-USA:

"In one letter, the Rebbe showed that when a Jew performs his mitzvos in an open, public manner,

"the effect is sure to be that 'all the nations of the earth will see that the Name of G-d is called upon you, and they will be afraid of you' — afraid to do you any harm,"

and therefore

"the whole world sees it with such clear perception that the 'hands of Esau' not only become impotent to harm the Jewish people, G-d forbid, but will be ready to aid them in every way possible" (20 Kislev, 5738, in Letters by the Lubavitcher Rebbe, vol. I, pp. 185-186).

"When gentile Americans, in exponentially growing numbers, will abandon their churches and their missionary efforts, when they will demand kosher meat (since treif meat in the stores often fails Noachide standards of even min chai), when they will replace their old, pagan holidays with Rosh Hashanah, Sukkos, and Chanukah, when they will finance rabbis to teach them relevant parts of Torah. . .  

[Torah is the Old Testament. . . yes, it is done. Christians worship the Old Testament, skip the Gospels and worship Saul the Pharisee, who's teachings came not even close to Jesus' message]

". . . when they will actively defend the territorial integrity of Eretz Israel  

[Greater Israel - It is being done as this is written: Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Iran . . . one by one they are falling like dead flies under the auspices of the 'guns of America'.]

". . . and proclaim the Rebbe to be Moshiach [Messiah] — then no Jew, anywhere, will retain the slightest desire to remain in golus. Every single Jewish man, woman, and child will run to embrace the Torah, finally revealing their true underlying desire.

"It is not a matter of actually transforming the gentiles so much as merely revealing the changes that have already been accomplished.

"The gentiles themselves have no idea that they are ready, for they have never even heard of the concept of Seven Noachide Laws".

"Not a matter of actually transforming the gentiles, rather revealing the changes that have already been accomplished." It harkens back to the statement allegedly made by General Cornwallis to George Washington, written in Legions of Satan: "In 200 years your churches will be teaching the religion of the Jews".

If you visit scripturesforamerica.org, you'll see a perfect example of how Pastor Pete Peters' faithful followers are being taught the religion of the Jews to the point of being encouraged to celebrate the holidays of the Jews.

His congregation -- "the lost sheep of Israel" -- has been instructed in the observance of the Talmudic Holidays mentioned in the JHG-USA article, although it is not spelled out explicitly; instead Peters urges observance of the Passover and then the other holidays that fall on the '91st days', without mentioning the names of the Holidays themselves (at least we did not find the names mentioned at the web site).

According to his explanation the 91st Days are figured thusly, using March 20th, 2003, the Spring Equinox - 1st day of Abib as the start: Passover is on April 2nd, the 14th day of Abib; from there "There are 13 weeks in the season (12 weeks for the 12 tribes and the 13th week is God's). The 7th day of the 13th week is the 91st Day."

So in 2003, the Anglo Israel 'Christian' 91st Days associated with Talmudic Holidays are as follows:

Passover on April 2nd (Talmudic Passover April 17)  

91st Day, June 19th, (Talmudic Shavuot, celebrates the harvest season in Israel and honors the 'giving of the Torah' - June 6th);

91st Day,  September 18th (Talmudic Rosh Hashanah - New Year - Sept 27th),

91st Day, December 18th (Talmudic Hanukkah - Festival of Lights, celebrates the Macabees' slaughter of their enemies - Dec. 20th) and

91st Day, March 19th (Talmudic Purim -- Most 'fun' Talmudic Holiday, celebrates the slaughter of tens of thousands of Persians according to the book of Esther - March 19th!).

As you can see, for some reason Pastor Peters' date of Passover for the lost sheep of Israel does not coincide with the Talmudic date, so the 91st Days don't fall exactly with the dates of the most important Talmudic Holidays; yet, they fall in the same months, which will make the transition to mandated observance of the Talmudic Holidays easier for the lost sheep of Israel.

Many biblical scholars are now declaring (possibly truthfully) that Jesus was not born on December 25th, but instead was born sometime in the fall, possibly late September or early October, citing scriptural passages about the climate, events and certain plants in bloom that 'prove' Jesus was a fall baby. That's okay, they say, because he was conceived on December 25th, at the winter solstice.

The time of Jesus birth, then, (and Christmas), would coincide with Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur, the beginning of the New Year, and the holiest day of the year for those who call themselves Jews.  My, my; what a 'coincidence'.  

The Lubavitchers plan to eliminate Christmas; however, former 'Christians (Hasidic Gentiles) will still be allowed to string up lights because the then-defunct Christmas holiday coincides chronologically with Hanukkah - the festival of lights; and they can spend, and spend and spend on Hanukkah presents. . . for eight days instead of just one!

The Judeo-Christian churches have also been teaching for some time now that Easter is a Pagan holiday worshipping Ishtar, the fertility goddess (probably true, as the words Easter/Ishtar would suggest), and that Passover is the 'true' holiday all should be celebrating. As we've previously pointed out, the 'Christian' churches -- especially the Catholic church -- are now taking the Seder (Passover) meal either in a Talmudic synagogue, or in their own converted 501(c)3 churches.

Shepherd's Chapel of Gravette, Arkansas has instituted an annual pilgrimage where so-called Christians travel from all over the country to attend the Passover meal. Shepherd's Chapel is world-wide, on their own television channel 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, as well as broadcasting on shortwave.

And. . . as has happened often during the course of putting the material together in this book-intended-to-be-an-article on "Jewish Persecution", it has a tendency to follow its own course. This portion led me into further searches that could fill an entire section.

The transposition of Christianity into Talmudism may have to be addressed further, although first, we're going to complete what we started on the Noachide Laws, which is after all the intended "end result". . . the adherence by all non-Jews, and especially Christians to the law of the Pharisees.

However, since most Christians are already practicing Jews, it might be said that the people of the Muslim faith are now the target enemy of the Priesthood. It looks as though that is in the works too. Lubavitcher Jew, democratic presidential hopeful Joe Lieberman declared On Fox News Sunday (11-30-03) that the world must be convinced that victory in Iraq matters as much to them in the civilized world as it does to the U.S. because:  

"this is a battle to stop al-Qaida (CIA created/controlled), Saddam Hussein and every other enemy of freedom and modernity from turning the beginning of the 21st century into what is truly unbelievable, which would be a global religious war".

The term "enemy of modernity" escapes my comprehension. However, Lieberman's remarks that a global religious war would be 'truly unbelievable' to him is a lie, and it's obvious the elite count on us forgetting their past comments. To refresh our reader's memory, over a year and a half ago, the Arizona Daily Star (4-27-02) reported a statement made by Ra'anan Gissen, a senior advisor to Ariel Sharon: Glissen said:

"We've [Israel] been fighting a war for the past 18 months, which is the harbinger of World War III. The world is going to fight, whether they like it or not. I'm sure".

Would we believe that Joe Lieberman is unaware of the priestly scheme to embroil the world in yet one more war to finalize their Plan for World Dominion, using 'religion' as their catalyst? Here is the final paragraph of the revealing piece from JHG-USA:

"But every Jew, including every shliach of the Rebbe, must immediately invest a portion of his time and efforts in developing a local Noachide congregation. The gentiles need to learn Torah, and to implement it by building new foundations for the family, new schools, new holidays, and all other aspects of the Noachide way of life. In this area, even the slightest efforts of a Jew will soon pay off visibly."

ARE YOU GETTING IT? THE GENTILES HAVE ALREADY LEARNED TORAH! The OLD TESTAMENT IS THE TORAH!! The first five books of the Old Testament make up the Torah, the foundation of the Talmud!

It is certainly "not a matter of actually transforming the gentiles, rather revealing the changes that have already been accomplished"; and who or what has brought this change about? The so-called Christian church, initiated by the Catholic church in the 16th century officially declaring the Old Testament to be part of the 'holy bible', as Maimonides explained:

". . . Christianity made the world familiar with the Old Testament, i.e. with Torah, but adds that its interpretation was erroneous and that the errors will be evident at the arrival of Jewry's political Messiah who, as leader of Jewry's armed power, will subjugate the non-Jewish nations of the world and will exterminate, together with their women and children, all those who refuse to accept the laws of Noah. (Jewry and Christianity, by Canon Lipot Huber, p. 141) 

Yes, I know. That quote is a repeat from the previous section. Maybe it needs to be said, and said, and said again:  They are dead serious here, friends. DEAD serious. According to Maimonides the 'interpretation' of the Old Testament by Christians is erroneous'. Do bear in mind that the Old Testament as given to the goyim is not identical in words to that of the Torah. The O.T. has been whitewashed somewhat so as not to alert 'Christians' to the fact that they, along with all other goyim who refuse to embrace the religion of the Jews, are to be exterminated.

Before this section was finished, we received a report from Carol A. Valentine, on the Noachide Laws, and specifically the Lubavitch movement. Her research far surpasses what has been written here. In the next section we will excerpt directly from her report.

There may be a few repeats of statements from the Talmud we've already discussed. They will be left in for the sake of context in Mrs. Valentine's report.

While reading her thoroughly documented information, recall and bear in mind the outcry by the Communist/Zionist ACLU time and again against anything that smacks of 'religion' in schools, public offices, courts. . . or in any public place that might 'offend' some atheistic person or a Jew. Take a bible to work to read on break and you're likely to join the ranks of the unemployed.

Keep it close in mind while you're discovering how co-mingled the U.S. Government -- president, congress, courts and the U.S. military machine -- have become with the religion of the Talmudists. In fact, they are now in the seats of highest power in governments, courts (including U.S. Supreme), the military and bureaucracies.

Not that it ever would, but. . . what do you think would happen if the U.S. Congress passed a law that intended to 'return the world to Christian principles'? You're right. It wouldn't get to first base. Yet, the legislative (law-making) branch of the U.S. Government has passed a law that asserts the "world" must succumb to the law of the Talmudists! They left out the most important word in that assertion, that is: ". . . the Gentile world" is to succumb to the law of the Talmudists.

As we read Carol Valentine's report, titled "Merry Christmas, and OFF WITH YOUR HEAD!", it becomes clear why the Ten Commandments are being removed from all public places. The Ten Commandments -- along with the 613 codified statutes -- are only for the Jews, NOT for the Gentiles!

Don't be surprised if the time should come when the Ten Commandments are being replaced in public places and especially in the Talmudic courts by the seven Noahide Laws. Jews will not be tried in those Noahide Courts: only the Gentiles who transgress the Pharisaical Noahide Law.

The ACLU, along with the ADL of the B'nai Brith, are the combined force behind the removal of the Ten Commandments, and the phony 'separation of Church and State' slogan. Notice they use (twist) the Constitution when it serves their purpose. As just one example: from KENS 5 and San Antonio Express News, on 7-9-02, a headline reads:

Roddy Stinson: ACLU, ADL and Americans United Eye City-funded Mural

This article related the joint activities of the groups mentioned above, objecting to a tile mural of Mary, mother of Jesus. The item said, in part:

Members of the San Antonio chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union discussed the potential church/state-separation violation . . .

A San Antonio member of the Anti-Defamation League asked officials of the ADL's Southwest Region to investigate the $50,000 expenditure, and a Houston-based ADL official subsequently informed this column that the group was in the process of examining "all the pertinent facts".

Allison Pierce, an "attorney fellow" with Americans United for Separation of Church and State, inquired from the group's D.C. office . . .

The ACLU was founded by Communist Zionist Jews. Carol Valentine's report fills in the missing pieces of this particular puzzle.  Meantime, here's a question to ponder: 'Jews and Hasidic Gentiles United to Save America. . . for whom? Save America for WHOM?!!!  Oh, yes, America is now the 'homeland' isn't it?

 

Christian America Behold your enemy

Talmudism

 

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II

"Questions"

"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7  

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

Raiser of Taxes

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

anti-semitism?

Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

infosam@bellsouth.net