Thanks to Dis Honorable Judge ," Judge Alfred T. Goodwin, another traitor to the American People. 

we now have a Godless pledge to uphold America under ONE God, the Only God, for a would be god, Baal.

The New Noachide Babylonian Talmudic Rabbi Pledge to Baal of the United States of America?

"We collectively pledge allegiance to the god of the "One World Order"  and to the "New Demonic-racy" for which it stands, One World System, under Baal, assimilated into the collective, with limited liberty. But justice for the elite."

10. Under our influence the execution of the laws of the GOYIM has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere. In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions, JUDGES DECIDE AS WE DICTATE TO THEM, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the GOYIM, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have anything in common with them - by newspaper opinion or by other means .... Even senators and the higher administration accept our counsels. The purely brute mind of the GOYIM is incapable of use for analysis and observation, and still more for the foreseeing whither a certain manner of setting a question may tend.

[A Peculiar combination flag]

[The flag of Third Reich]

"I Pledge Allegiance to the flag of King George?

The good Judge Alfred T. Goodwin is only abiding by the New Laws imposed by  President George H. Walker Bush, which will tear down any resemblence of a God Head in this Nation and replace the Lord with the Babylonian Talmudic Laws of Obedient Noachide for the coming announcement of the well established "New World Order, otherwise known as the Talmudic Olam Ha Ba. The current president, George W. Bush, also an elitist and a Skull and Bones member, of the secret society in which he made a covenant with death Babylonian Baal style, will only put up a "Patriotic" Sham fight of empty eloquence in opposition to Puppet Judge Goodwins decision.


Excerpts from the so-called forgeries of the International controversial

"Protocols of the Learned Elders of the Babylonian Talmudic Rabbis of Zion"

some know them as the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"

3. But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negatived by the very laws of creation, for they have established subordination. With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why IT IS INDISPENSABLE FOR US TO UNDERMINE ALL FAITH, TO TEAR OUT OF THE MIND OF THE "GOYIM" THE VERY PRINCIPLE OF GOD-HEAD AND THE SPIRIT, AND TO PUT IN ITS PLACE ARITHMETICAL CALCULATIONS AND MATERIAL NEEDS.

4. In order to give the GOYIM no time to think and take note, their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus, all the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe. But again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the GOYIM, we must put industry on a speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.

1. When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God ( Speaking of the One they accepted in the place of Jesus Christ, the robber, they chose instead) with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People (Divorced people until the Lord comes) and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief.(Jesus Christ) If this gives birth to the atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a warning for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of Moses,(Pharisaic seat of Moses) that, by its stable and thoroughly elaborated system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us. Therein we shall emphasize its mystical right,(Mystical Qabalah of Babylon Talmud) on which, as we shall say, all its educative power is based (Education Day USA, George H. W. Bush) .... Then at every possible opportunity we shall publish articles in which we shall make comparisons between our beneficent rule and those of past ages.(Fables of the Jews) The blessing of tranquillity, though it be a tranquillity forcibly brought about by centuries of agitation,(god of forces, Satan)  will throw into higher relief the benefits to which we shall point.( Benefits: if you are not a Talmudised Noachide you shall be terminated from Olam Ha Ba) The errors of the GOYIM governments will be depicted by us in the most vivid hues. We shall implant such an abhorrence of them that the peoples will prefer tranquillity in a state of serfdom to those rights of vaunted freedom which have tortured humanity and exhausted the very sources of human existence, sources which have been exploited by a mob of rascally adventurers who know not what they do .... USELESS CHANGES OF FORMS OF GOVERNMENT TO WHICH WE INSTIGATED THE "GOYIM" WHEN WE WERE UNDERMINING THEIR STATE STRUCTURES, WILL HAVE SO WEARIED THE PEOPLES BY THAT TIME THAT THEY WILL PREFER TO SUFFER ANYTHING UNDER US RATHER THAN RUN THE RISK OF ENDURING AGAIN ALL THE AGITATIONS AND MISERIES THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH.

WorldCom 'outrageous': Bush The man of Dan.
Yeah right !

ARTICLE 2 OF UNITED NATIONS LAW The Preamble, Article I (Objectives) and Article 2 (Functions), defines the entire concept of the New World Order - eight years before the election of President Bush and 10 months before the election of Ronald Reagan. The foreign Constitution states that the intent of the New World Order is to "direct, control, finance and subsidize all natural and human resources and agro-related, as well as basic industries...through dynamic social and economic changes...with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international economic order." The Preamble creates an oligarchy who will establish "rational and equitable international economic relations". United States currency and coin, used by most standards, would no longer be stabilized nor assured of its value. A new economic standard would be implemented. An example of this type of shifting can be seen in Europe with the establishment of the Euro Dollar, which forced several European nations to devalue their currency. The United Nations Industrial Development Organization does not call for general elections. A total of 45 members are elected to a Board of Directors by the General Assembly. There is no guarantee the larger, more industrial nations will be represented on the Board.


President vows an investigation into telecom's cooked books; Congress to hold hearings.
June 26, 2002: 3:09 PM EDT
By Jake Ulick, CNN/Money Staff Writer

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - President Bush Wednesday promised a full investigation into the accounting problems at WorldCom, vowing to hold accountable those responsible for Corporate America's latest bookkeeping scandal.

Bush spoke in Canada, a day after WorldCom admitted to misstating more than $3.8 billion in financial results, whacking investor confidence, threatening to bring down the nation's No. 2 long-distance company and tarnishing another corporate success story of the 1990s.

Excerpts "Protocols

39. We shall so hedge about our system of accounting that neither the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant will be in a position to divert even the smallest sum from its destination without detection or to direct it in another direction except that which will be once fixed in a definite plan of action.

5. The intensified struggle for superiority and shocks delivered to economic life will create, nay, have already created, disenchanted, cold and heartless communities. Such communities will foster a strong aversion towards the higher political and towards religion. Their only guide is gain, that is Gold, which they will erect into a veritable cult, for the sake of those material delights which it can give. Then will the hour strike when, not for the sake of attaining the good, not even to win wealth, but solely out of hatred towards the privileged, the lower classes of the GOYIM will follow our lead against our rivals for power, the intellectuals of the GOYIM.


6. At the same time we must intensively patronize trade and industry, but, first and foremost, speculation, the part played by which is to provide a counterpoise to industry: the absence of speculative industry will multiply capital in private hands and will serve to restore agriculture by freeing the land from indebtedness to the land banks. What we want is that industry should drain off from the land both labor and capital and by means of speculation transfer into our hands all the money of the world, and thereby throw all the GOYIM into the ranks of the proletariat. Then the GOYIM will bow down before us, if for no other reason but to get the right to exist.

They have been Highly successful at reporting higher earnings creating false and inflated stock prices then by media letting the earning discrepancies be known by the public, the stock prices fall immediately, they earn double the reported manipulated losses. The losers are the investors, employees and the American Families. The winners are the European Elite Jewish Bankers.

The intention they have in preparation for the Olam Ha Ba is to eventually force corporations which they now have under their control, to abide by strict Ethics codes. After all they own America virtually lock stock and barrel. Another move soon by them will be to make the nations Accountants Kestapo agents, reporting discrepancies, mush as their strong arm bankers now do.



Bush: Criminal CEOs need jail

As accounting scandal deepens, president wants tough standards for execs.
June 28, 2002: 3:01 PM EDT

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - President Bush wants corporate leaders who cook the books to go to jail, a White House spokesman said Friday, as the government rolls out measures to restore investor confidence in the wake of the WorldCom scandal.

39. We shall so hedge about our system of accounting that neither the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant will be in a position to divert even the smallest sum from its destination without detection or to direct it in another direction except that which will be once fixed in a definite plan of action.



Pledge Declared Unconstitutional


By David Kravets
Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, June 26, 2002; 2:31 PM

SAN FRANCISCO –– A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion and cannot be recited in schools.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a 1954 act of Congress inserting the phrase "under God" after the words "one nation" in the pledge. 

The court said the phrase violates the so-called Establishment Clause in the Constitution that requires a 

separation of church and state.

HA Ha He He He!

what they meant was seperation of Jesus and "One World Order" to establish Talmudic Babylon Rule.

"A profession that we are a nation 'under God' is identical, for Establishment Clause purposes, to a profession that we are a nation 'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a nation 'under no god,' because none of these professions can be neutral with respect to religion," Judge Alfred T. Goodwin wrote for the three-judge panel.

© 2002 The Associated Press

The Dis Honorable and treasonous righteous Noachide, Judge Alfred T.Goodwin 

'Under Zeus'

"The recitation that ours is a nation 'under God' is not a mere acknowledgment that many Americans believe in a deity. Nor is it merely descriptive of the undeniable historical significance of religion in the founding of the Republic. Rather, the phrase 'one nation under God' in the context of the Pledge is normative. To recite the Pledge is not to describe the United States; instead, it is to swear allegiance to the values for which the flag stands: unity, indivisibility, liberty, justice, and -- since 1954 -- monotheism. The text of the official Pledge, codified in federal law, impermissibly takes a position with respect to the purely religious question of the existence and identity of God. A profession that we are a nation 'under God' is identical, for Establishment Clause purposes, to a profession that we are a nation 'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a nation 'under no god,' because none of these professions can be neutral with respect to religion."

-- Judge Alfred T. Goodwin, majority opinion for himself and Judge Stephen Reinhardt


He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?


There is only One God, Jesus Christ the Lord Over All, but they will take the Lord God out, so that Satan can establish his Olam Ha Ba, the 

New "One World Order"

2. The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down, for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The GOYIM are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales would come into equilibrium. But the pivots - the kings on their thrones - are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible power. This power they owe to the terror which has been breathed into the palaces. As they have no means of getting at their people, into their very midst, the kings on their thrones are no longer able to come to terms with them and so strengthen themselves against seekers after power. We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart.

Judge Talks of Pledge Decision
Wed Jul 3, 2:56 PM ET

By DAVID KRAVETS, Associated Press Writer

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The appeals court judge who declared the Pledge of Allegiance an unconstitutional endorsement of religion says he was following Supreme Court precedents.

Judge Alfred Goodwin said he and concurring Judge Stephen Reinhardt believe the 2-1 decision last week by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ( news - web sites) was consistent with a long line of church-school rulings from the nation's highest court.

Legal scholars disagree on whether that's true. But most say the Supreme Court will overturn the ruling if it gets that far.

The ruling, which came in the case of a Sacramento atheist who doesn't want his daughter subjected to the pledge, has been sharply criticized by President Bush ( news - web sites), members of Congress and religious organizations.

Goodwin said the Constitution's Establishment Clause, which calls for the separation of church and state, has been used by the Supreme Court to bar a host of religious activity in schools — including clergy-led prayers at graduations and student-led prayers at school sporting events.

If you are paying attention you can see right through this diversion, the sham fight of empty eloquence, using their own words. Do you or have you heard any person oppose the Joining of Babylonian Talmudic Judaism of the sons of the synagogues of Satan, his church with the Federal Government of the United States of America? Of course not, because you have been concentrating on the diversion which their controlled media feeds your sleeping minds.


"The strongest cases were what the Supreme Court has been saying about school prayers, including at athletic events," Goodwin said in a telephone interview Monday from his home in Sisters, Ore. "This indicated that the Supreme Court was reading the Establishment Clause rather broadly. We felt we were consistent with those opinions."

Undermining the SOUP-Primed Court's ruling further confusing the shaky constitution, making a constitutional fight when the constitution was absolved in the coup of Georgie W. "Burning Shrub" Bushka. 

Goodwin, appointed to the 9th Circuit by President Nixon in 1971, said Congress added the phrase "under God" to the pledge in 1954 for religious reasons, knowing that many states require school children to recite the pledge.

Reinhardt, appointed by President Carter in 1980, is perhaps the circuit's most liberal judge. In an interview, he defended a decision that has been criticized and noted that "legal experts have been very careful not to say the decision was incorrect."

Some legal scholars, historians and political scientists said they believe the ruling was in line with Supreme Court precedent — though the suspect the high court will overturn the ruling if the full 9th Circuit doesn't.

But of course they will for the Judaic Laws must stand, the Laws enacted by the Chabad Lubavitchers, Noachide Laws of the Babylonian Talmud.

Laurence Tribe, a Harvard constitutional law scholar, said Goodwin didn't take into account other cases that say religious aspects of public life aren't always unconstitutional, including the Supreme Court decision upholding religious invocations before statehouse legislative sessions.

Tribe said the insertion of God into the pledge may have been for religious reasons, but five decades later the phrase "under God" no longer evokes a religious experience. He said the Supreme Court has upheld so-called "blue laws" that prohibit businesses from operating in some states on Sunday, even though the laws originally were designed on the premise that "God rested on Sunday."

"A religious origin for something doesn't always doom it," Tribe said.

Under Goodwin's thinking, he added, the Constitution could not be posted in public classrooms because it refers to 1787, "the year of our Lord."

"The Constitution would be unconstitutional," Tribe said.

But of course it depends upon the definition of what "Is" is, wouldn't it?

Erwin Chemerinsky, a University of Southern California legal scholar, was among the few voices suggesting the Supreme Court would leave the 9th Circuit's ruling intact.

"I don't think it's a sure thing that it's going to be reversed," Chemerinsky said. "I think the case was clearly right under the Establishment Clause."

Goodwin wasn't about to speculate.

10. Liberalism produced Constitutional States, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the GOYIM, namely, Despotism; and A CONSTITUTION, AS YOU WELL KNOW, IS NOTHING ELSE BUT A SCHOOL OF DISCORDS, misunderstandings, quarrels, disagreements, fruitless party agitations, party whims - in a word, a school of everything that serves to destroy the personality of State activity. THE TRIBUNE OF THE "TALKERICS" HAS, NO LESS EFFECTIVELY THAN THE PRESS, CONDEMNED THE RULERS TO INACTIVITY AND IMPOTENCE, and thereby rendered them useless and superfluous, for which reason indeed they have been in many countries deposed. THEN IT WAS THAT THE ERA OF REPUBLICS BECOME POSSIBLE OF REALIZATION; AND THEN IT WAS THAT WE REPLACED THE RULER BY A CARICATURE OF A GOVERNMENT - BY A PRESIDENT, TAKEN FROM THE MOB, FROM THE MIDST OF OUR PUPPET CREATURES, OR SLAVES. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the GOY people, I should rather say, under the GOY peoples.

But the same man of Dan, George W. Bush's Father, George H. Walker Bush made Babylonian Talmudic Judaism The National Religion. All the King's men have seemed to miss this uniting of Federal ONE World Order and Babylonian Baal Worship. The Uniting of Judasim and Federal Law.


And they have indeed Joined Satan and State, Out with the Lord God the Most High and people and in with the new god of the Babylonian Talmudic Jews. The Law is set up. We all become obedient Goy Toys under the Global Dictator to come, their god, that mere man, that Falsechrist who will scatter the power of the saints of God, Temporary he be. The Good Judge Goodwin is just doing what they have told him to do.

So who is brave enough to sue the President of the United States and the Congress and Satan for enacting the Noachide Laws imposed and introduced by one of Satan's finest sons of his synagogue ;Chabad Lubavitch, Rabbi Mendel Menachem Schneerson the so-called Righteous Tzaddik of this generation and Skull and Bones George H. Walker Bush, who both are unblessed, and Schneerson, very dead with worms crawling over his putrid body, unblessed he be?


So now we have established the laws which will behead any person who stands firm for the testimony of Jesus. We have established the Noachide Laws. We have a president which rose during the coup of 2000 and he is now fighting the holy wars for the Babylonian Jews, what they call the wars of Hashem against the enemy of the Babylonian Talmudic sons of the synagogue of Satan. First the Arabs, then the Christians.

Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens

(London, November 7)

FBI agents in the United States probing relatives of Saudi-born terror suspect Osama Bin Laden before September 11 were told to back off soon after George W Bush became president, the BBC has reported.

The BBC's Newsnight current affairs programme on Tuesday said that Bush at one point had a number of connections with Saudi Arabia's prominent Bin Laden family.

It added there was a suspicion that the US strategic interest in Saudi Arabia, which has the world's biggest oil reserve, blunted its inquiries into individuals with suspected terrorist connections -- so long as the US was safe.

Newsnight reported it had seen secret documents from an FBI probe into the September 11 terror attacks that showed that at least two other US-based members of the Bin Laden family are suspected to have links with a possible terrorist organisation.

The programme said it had obtained evidence that the FBI was on the trail of Bin Laden family members living in United States before, as well as after, the terrorist attacks.

Newsnight said Bush made his first million 20 years ago with an oil company partly funded by the chief US representative of Salem Bin Laden, Osama's brother.

Bush also received fees as director of a subsidiary of Carlyle Corporation, a little-known private company which in just a few years since its founding has become one of America's biggest defence contractors, and his father, George Bush Sr, is also a paid advisor, the programme said.

The connection became embarrassing when it was revealed that the Bin Ladens held a stake in Carlyle, sold just after September 11, it added.


What your so-called leader of the new Reichstag, Patriotic Act has seemed to neglect to tell the People.

The Noachide Laws imposed by Congress, 102-14

Chabad-Lubavitch is now an international movement with headquarters in New York. The American Friends of Chabad Lubavitch in Washington, D.C. coordinates activities for Chabad on Capital Hill, lobbies for Chabad causes, and runs study groups and social programs geared towards congressional staffers. In 1991, Chabad-Lubavitch in cooperation with President Bush established the observance of Education Day, USA "to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws."
Public Law 102--14 (H.J. Res. 104): March 20, 1991
Education Day, USA Proclamation
Joint Resolution to designate March 26, 1991 disguised as "Education Day, USA"

Which are no-where in the Holy Word of God, But are imposed by the Babylonian Talmud or Talmud Babli of Satan.

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Legislated Babylonian Talmudic Judaic Morality for obedient little Goy.

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

Known by Babylonian Talmudic Jews.

Better known by the Lord of Host Jesus, whom they rejected.

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

Force by legislation Talmudic Despotism.

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

Just Ignore, Homosexuality, Pedophilia, Murder, Corruption, Pornography, Hollywood filth. And to be a good Goyim you must become a righteous Noachide under Babylonian Talmudic dictatorship.

Whereas the Lubavitch movement (Judaic Babylonian Talmudic Rabbis) has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

( Yes just one Religious Group of Baal, the Mother of Mystery Babylon has made the President of the United States of America as well as all industrialized nations, make the  Noachide Laws of the Great Sanhedrin, the Pharisees of Baal the Federal Statute of the United States of America, Totally disregarding the so-called separation of Church and State. They will play Supreme Court games to keep the truth diverted to sham fights of empty eloquences. False oppositions.

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally (?) respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

Universally respected by the advocates of the New World Order of Satan

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe", this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving", the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as "Education Day. U.S.A.". The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Approved March 20, 1991.

The traitors of Jesus Christ the Lord God the Most High and the freedom of the United States of America, in the name of peace they shall destroy wonderfully.


And they have began their plan to totally discredit Christianity. And many are falling for the fables of the Jews

Protocols of Babylon, the Whore


2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF "GOYIM," and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall act clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.

They are working on The Catholics and the Protestant Churches, who are in Jesus Christ....... NOW !!!

3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place.


Their man god, Moishich ben Satan the son of Satan, Lucifer, the False-Christ

3. The supreme lord who will replace all now existing rulers, dragging in their existence among societies demoralized by us, societies that have denied even the authority of God, from whose midst breads out on all sides the fire of anarchy, must first of all proceed to quench this all-devouring flame. Therefore he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies, though he should drench them with his own blood, that he may resurrect them again in the form of regularly organized troops fighting consciously with every kind of infection that may cover the body of the State with sores.

4. This Chosen One of God is chosen from above to demolish the senseless forces moved by instinct and not reason, by brutishness and humanness. These forces now triumph in manifestations of robbery and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and rights. They have overthrown all forms of social order to erect on the ruins of the throne of the King of the Jews; but their part will be played out the moment he enters into his kingdom. Then it will be necessary to sweep them away from his path, on which must be left no knot, no splinter.

5. Then will it be possible for us to say to the peoples of the world: Give thanks to God (Their god Baal Moshiach )and bow the knee before him who bears on his front the seal  of the predestination of man, to which God himself has led his star that none other but Him might free us from all the before-mentioned forces and evils.

He will be 'O Lucifer, son of the morning

Isaiah 14:12-18

12: How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13: For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds;
I will be like the most High.
15: Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.
16: They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying,
Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
17: That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?
18: All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house.


Do not be deceived, the Great Sanhedrin is alive and well. George H.W. Bush proved this with Public Law, instituted and in honor of Rabbi Mendel  Menachem Schneerson the Zaddik of the Lubavitch Talmudic Religion. Zaddik =redeemer

This law put into effect by Executive Order in the United States of America and ratified by Congress. Noachide Law.

Below President Reagan signs a proclamation honoring the Rebbe for his efforts on behalf of education in general, and disseminating the Universal Noachide Code in particular Left to right: Rabbis Yisroel Deren (Stamford, Connecticut), Moshe Feller (Minnesota), Shlomo Cunin (California), the President, Rabbis Avraham Shemtov
(Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), Shimon Lazaroff (Texas), Yakov Kranz (Virginia).

the President of the United States, has quietly and subversively instituted a new State Ran Religion of Babylonian-ism, without as much as a squeak of Opposition from so-called Churchianity


Public Laws

When a bill is signed into law by the President it is sent to the Office of the Federal Register to be assigned a law number and paginated for the United States Statutes at Large. Afterwards, a List of Public Laws is created, posted online, and then published in the Federal Register. The list includes

The Lists of Public Laws are collections of these entries, arranged by law number.


Ronald Reagan went own to lose his mind, much like Nebuchadnezzar.
Noachide Categories: Remember his wife Nancy consulted spirits of the dead as does Hillary Clinton, But "God Bless Abortionia" 

Noachide Laws of the Babylon Religious System

1. Murder is forbidden: The life of a human being, formed in G-d's image, is sacred.
2. Theft is forbidden. The world is not ours to do as we please.
3. incestuous and adulterous relations are forbidden. Human beings are not sexual objects, nor is pleasure the ultimate goal of life.
4. Eating the flesh of a living animal is forbidden. This teaches us to be sensitive to cruelty to animals. (This was commanded to Noah for the first time along with the permission of eating meat. Genesis 9:1-17. The negative laws were enforced at the Garden of Eden.)
5. Idolatry is forbidden: Man is commanded to believe in the One G-d alone and worship only G-d.

Their god is not the God the Most High Jesus Christ the Lord of Lords and the King of Kings the Alpha and the Omega. They have not the Father, for they have not the son. The Law Fulfilled as according to the Prophets of God. The Lamb, the Everlasting Covenant. The Covenant will be confirmed with many soon, but I assure you it will not be a seven year peace treaty, but the Everlasting Covenant made by the Lord God to his saints.

6. Cursing the name of G-d is forbidden. Besides honoring and respecting G-d, we learn from this precept that our speech must be sanctified, as that is the distinctive sign which separated man from the animals.

Their soon to be god, Moshiach ben Satan. If you reject him and curse him you shall be brought up to their synagogues and be afflicted and slain. If you Bless the Lord of Host, you will indeed curse the son of perdition.

7. Mankind is commanded to establish courts of justice and a just social order to enforce the first six laws and enact any other useful laws or customs.

The U.S. Congress officially recognized the Noachide Laws in legislation which was passed by both  houses. Congress and the President of the United States (then Ronald Reagan) indicated in Public Law  102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization.

Beware of the International Court of Justice, The Sanhedrin !


The doctrines of the Lubavitch Movement are derived from the  Mystical Kabbalah, the source book of Jewish mysticism or Gnosticism. The Encyclopedia of Religion states that the Lubavitch Hasidic interpretation of the Lurianic system of Kabbalah is among those taught in traditional Jewish institutions:

It has been pointed out that the second Noahide Law which prohibits blasphemy will preclude the worship of 

Jesus Christ

who was once accused of this very crime by the Sanhedrin. Moses Maimonides 

(Mammon Eyes )(Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon - 1138­1204), better known as the Rambam, is universally recognized for his preeminence as a Jewish philosopher and thinker. His influence remains unabated until the present time. Maimonides classic work, Mishnah Torah, opens with a section on systematic philosophical theology, derived largely from Aristotelian science and metaphysics.

Maimonides Mishnah Torah, in Chapter 10 of the English Translation, states concerning Jesus Christ:

"It is a mitzvah [religious duty; ARC], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minnim, and apikorsim, and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot." 6.

The Lies of Satan


The followers of "that man," whose name is taken by the Jews to mean "May his name and memory be blotted out," are not otherwise to be regarded than as people whom it would be good to get rid of. They are called Romans and tyrants who hold captive the children of Israel, and by their destruction the Jews would be freed from this Fourth Captivity. Every Jew  is therefore bound to do all he can to destroy that impious kingdom of the Edomites (Rome) which rules the whole world. Since, however, it is not always and everywhere possible to effect this extermination of Christians, the Talmud orders that they should be attacked at least indirectly, namely: by injuring them in every possible way, and by thus lessening their power, help towards their ultimate destruction. Wherever it is possible a Jew should kill Christians, and do so without mercy.


A Jew is commanded to harm Christians wherever he can, both indirectly by not helping them in any way, and also directly by wrecking their plans and projects; neither must he save a Christian who is in danger of death.

Zohar (1, 25b) it says:
"Those who do good to the
Akum . . . will not rise from the dead."
At times it is permitted to do good to Christians, but only in order to help Israel, namely, for the sake of peace and to hide hatred of them. Maimonides in
Hilkhoth Akum (X, 6) says:
"Needy Gentiles may be helped as well as needy Jews, for the sake of peace..."
Iore Dea (148, 12 Hagah) it says:
"Therefore if you enter a town and find them celebrating a feast, you may pretend to rejoice with them in order to hide your hatred. Those, however, who care about the salvation of their souls should keep away from such celebrations. You should make it known that it is a hateful thing to rejoice with them, if you can do so without incurring enmity."

Abhodah Zarah (20, a, Toseph) it says:
"Do not say anything in praise of them, lest it be said: How good that
Goi is!"
In this way they explain the words of
Deuteronomy (VII, 2)... and thou shalt show no mercy unto them [Goim], as cited in the Gemarah. Rabbi S. Iarchi explains this Bible passage as follows:
"Do not pay them any compliments; for it is forbidden to say: how good that
Goi is."
Iore Dea (151, 14) it says:
"No one is allowed to praise them or to say how good an
Akum is. How much less to praise what they do or to recount anything about them which would redound to their glory. If, however, while praising them you intend to give glory to God, namely, because he has created comely creatures, then it is allowed to do so."

Hilkhoth Akum (V, 12) it says:
"It is also forbidden to make mention of the
Akum; for it is written (Exodus XXIII, 13):...and make no mention of other gods."

Iore Dea (146, 15) it says:
"Their idols must be destroyed, or called by contemptuous names."
Ibidem, (147, 5):
"It is permitted to deride idols, and it is forbidden to say to a
Goi: May your God help you, or I hope you will succeed."
Rabbi Bechai, explaining the text of
Deuteronomy about hating idolatry, says:
"The Scripture teached us to hate idols and to call them by ignominious names. Thus, if the name of a church is
Bethgalia - "house of magnificence," it should be called Bethkaria - an insignificant house, a pigs' house, a latrine. For this word, karia, denotes a low-down, slum place."
In numerous places ignominious names are given by the Jews to Christian things. It will not be out of place to list a few of these names which they give to things and persons which are held holy and dear by Christians, as follows:
JESUS is ignominiously called
Jeschu - which means, May his name and memory be blotted out. His proper name in Hebrew is Jeschua, which means Salvation.
Charia - dung, excrement (German Dreck). In Hebrew her proper name is Miriam.
CHRISTIAN SAINTS, the word for which in Hebrew
Kedoschim, are called Kededchim (cinaedos) - feminine men (Fairies). Women saints are called Kedeschoth, whores.
SUNDAY is called the day of calamity.
Nital, denoting extermination.
EASTER is not called by the proper name
Pesach (Passover), but Ketsach, meaning a cutting down; or Kesach, a Gallows.
A CHRISTIAN CHURCH is not called
Beth Hattefillah, House of Prayer, but Beth Hattiflah, a House of Vanity, a House of Evil.
Aavon Gilaion, Books of Iniquity.
CHRISTIAN SACRIFICES are called Dung Offerings. In the Jerusalem Talmud (fol. 13b) the following occurs:
"He who sees them
mezabbelim (excrementing - sacrificing) before their idol, let him say (Exod. XXII, 20): He that sacrificeth unto an idol shall be utterly destroyed."
Rabbi Iarchi (referring to
Num. XXV, 3) teaches that the Gentiles actually honor their God by excrementing before him.
A CHRISTIAN GIRL who works for Jews on their sabbath is called a
Schaw-wesschicksel, Sabbath Dirt.

Hilkohoth Akum (X, 5) it says:
"It is forbidden to give gifts to the
Goim. But it is permitted to give them to a convert who lives among the Jews; for it is said: To the traveller who stops in your cities, give it to him to eat, or sell it to a Gentile, that is sell it, not give it."
Iore Dea (151, 11) it says:
"It is forbidden to give free gifts to the
Akum with whom a Jew may not treat familiarly."
The Talmud, however, allows a Jew to give gifts to Gentiles who are known to himand from whom he has hope of getting something in return.

Iore Dea (334, 43) it says:
"In 24 cases a Jew must be repudiated, namely ...8. Anyone who sells his farm to the
Akum must be sent into exile - unless he undertakes to make up for all the harm that follows as a consequence of having the Akum live near the Jews."

Iore Dea (154, 2) it says:
"It is not permitted to teach any trade to the

Since the
Goim minister to Jews like beasts of burden, they belong to a Jew together with his life and all his faculties:
"The life of a
Goi and all his physical powers belong to a Jew." (A. Rohl. Die Polem. p.20)
It is an axiom of the Rabbis that a Jew may take anything that belongs to Christians for any reason whatsoever, even by fraud; nor can such be called robbery since it is merely taking what belongs to him.

In Babha Bathra (54 b) it says:
"All things pertaining to the
Goim are like a desert; the first person to come along and take them can claim them for his own."

Choschen Hamm. (183, 7) it says:
"If you send a messenger to collect money from an
Akum and the Akum pays too much, the messenger may keep the difference. But if the messenger does not know about it, then you may keep it all yourself."

Choschen Hamm. (266, 1) it says:
"A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the
Akum, for it is written: Return to thy brethren what is lost (Deuter. XXII, 3). For he who returns lost property [to Christians] sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

Babha Kama (113b) it says:
"It is permitted to deceive a
And in
Choschen Hamm. (156, 5 Hagah) it says:
"If a Jew is doing good business with an
Akum it is not allowed to other Jews, in certain places, to come and do business with the same Akum. In other places, however, it is different, where another Jews is allowed to go to the same Akum, lead him on, do business with him and to deceive him and take his money. For the wealth of the Akum is to be regarded as common property and belongs to the first who can get it. There are some, however, who say that this should not be done."
Choschen Hamm. (183, 7 Hagah) it says:
"If a Jew is doing business with an
Akum and a fellow Israelite comes along and defrauds the Akum, either by false measure, weight or number, he must divide his profit with his fellow Israelite, since both had a part in the deal, and also in order to help him along."

Iore Dea (157, 2 Hagah) it says:
"If a Jew is able to deceive them [idolaters] by pretending he is a worshipper of the stars, he may do so."

Abhodah Zarah (54a) it says:;
"It is allowed to take usury from Apostates who fall into idolatry."
And in
Iore Dea (159, 1) it says:
"It is permitted, according to the
Torah, to lend money to an Akum with usury. Some of the Elders, however, deny this except in a case of life and death. Nowadays it is permitted for any reason."


Babha Kama (113a) it says:
"Our teaching is as follows: When a Jew and a
Goi come into court, absolve the Jew, if you can, according to the laws of Israel. If the Goi wins, tell him that is what our laws require. If however, the Jew can be absolved according to the gentile law, absolve him and say it is due to our laws. If this cannot be done proceed callously against the Goim, as Rabbi Ischmael advises. Rabbi Akibha, however, holds that you cannot act fraudulently lest you profane the Name of God, and have a Jew commited for perjury."
A marginal note, however, explains  this qualification of Rabbi Akibha as follows:
"The name of God is not profaned when it is not known by the
Goi that the Jew has lied."
And further on, the
Babha Kama (113b) says:
"The name of God is not profaned when, for example, a Jew lies to a
Goi by saying: 'I gave something to your father, but he is dead; you must return it to me,' as long as the Goi does not know that you are lying."

Kallah (1b, p.18) it says:
"She (the mother of the
mamzer) said to him, 'Swear to me.' And Rabbi Akibha swore with his lips, but in his heart he invalidated his oath."
A similar text is found in
Schabbuoth Hagahoth of Rabbi Ascher (6d):
"If the magistrate of a city compels Jews to swear that they will not escape from the city nor take anything out of it, they may swear falsely by saying to themselves that they will not escape today, nor take anything out of the city today only."

Jews must spare no means in fighting the tyrants who hold them in this Fourth Captivity in order to set themselves free. They must fight Christians with astuteness and do nothing to prevent evil from happening to them: their sick must not be cared for, Christian women in childbirth must not be helped, nor must they be saved when in danger of death.

Zohar (I, 160a) it says:
"Rabbi Jehuda said to him [Rabbi Cezkia]: 'He is to be praised who is able to free himself from the enemies of Israel, and the just are much to be praised who get free from them and fight against them. 'Rabbi Chezkia asked, 'How must we fight against them?' Rabbi Jehuda said,
'By wise counsel thou shalt war against them' (Proverbs, ch. 24, 6). By what  kind of war? The kind of war that every son of man must fight against his enemies, which Jacob used against Esau - by deceit and trickery whenever possible. They must be fought against without ceasing, until proper order be restored. Thus it is with satisfaction that I say we should free ourselves from them and rule over them."

Iore Dea (158, 1) it says:
Akum are not to be cured, even for money, unless it would incur their enmity."

Orach Chaiim (330, 2) it says:
"No help is to be given to an
Akun woman in labor on the sabbath, even in a small way, for the Sabbath must not be violated."

Choschen Hamm. (425, 5) it says:
"If you see a heretic, who does not believe in the
Torah, fall into a well in which there is a ladder, hurry at once and take it away and say to him 'I have to go and take my son down from a roof; I will bring the ladder back to you at once' or something else. The Kuthaei, however, who are not our enemies, who take care of the sheep of the Israelites, are not to be killed directly, but they must not be saved from death."
And in
Iore Dea (158, 1) it says:
Akum who are not enemies of ours must not be killed directly, nevertheless they must not be saved from danger of death. For example, if you see one of them fall into the sea, do not pull him out unless he promises to give you money."
Maimonides, in
Hilkhoth Akum (X, 1) says:
"Do not have pity for them, for it is said (
Deuter. VII, 2): Show no mercy unto them. Therefore, if you see an Akum in difficulty or drowning, do not go to his help. And if he is in danger of death, do not save him from death. But it is not right to kill him by your own hand by shoving them into a well or in some other way, since they are not at war with us."



Lastly, the Talmud commands that Christians are to be killed without mercy. In the Abhodah Zarah (26b) it says:
"Heretics, traitors and apostates are to be thrown into a well and not rescued."
And in
Choschen Hammischpat (388, 10) it says:
"A spy is to be killed, even in our days, wherever he is found. He may be killed even before he confesses. And even if he admits that he only intended to do harm to somebody, and if the harm which he intended is not very great, it is sufficient to have him  condemned to death. He must be warned, however, not to confess to this. But if he impudently says 'No, I will confess it!' then he must be killed, and the sooner the better. If there is no time to warn him, it is not necessary to do so. There are some who say that a traitor is to be put to death only when it is impossible  to get rid of him by mutilating him, that is, by cutting out his tongue or his eyes, but if this can be done he must not be killed, since he is not any worse than others who persecute us."
And in
Choschen Hamm. again (388, 15) it says:
"If it can be proved that someone has betrayed Israel three times, or has given the money of Israelites to the
Akum, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."

Even a Christian who is found studying the Law of Israel merits death. In
Sanhedrin (59a) it says:
"Rabbi Jochanan says: A
Goi who pries into the Law is guilty to death."

Hilkhoth Akum (X, 2) it says:
"These things [supra] are intended for idolaters. But Israelites also, who lapse from their religion and become epicureans, are to be killed, and we must persecute them to the end. For they afflict Israel and turn the people from God."

And in Iore Dea (158, 2 Hagah) it says:
"Renegades who turn to the pleasures of the
Akum, and who become contaminated with them by worshipping stars and planets as they do, are to be killed."
Likewise in
Choschen Hamm. (425, 5) it says:
"Jews who become epicureans, who take to the worship of stars and planets and sin maliciously; also those who eat the flesh of wounded animals, or who dress in vain clothes, deserve the name of epicureans; likewise those who deny the Torah and the Prophets of Israel - the law is that all those should be killed; and those who have the power of life and death should have them killed; and if this cannot be done, they should be led to their death by deceptive methods."

Rabbi Maimonides, in Hilkhoth Teschubhah (III, 8) gives the list of those who are considered as denying the Law:
"There are three classes of people who deny the Law of the Torah: (1) Those who say that the Torah was not given by God, at least one verse or one word of it, and who say that it was all the work of Moses; (2) Those who reject the explanation of the Torah, namely, the Oral Law of the
Mischnah, and do not recognize the authority of the Doctors of the Law, like the followers of Tsadok (Sadducees) and Baithos; (3) Those who say that God changed the Law for another New Law, and that the Torah no longer has any value, although they do not deny that it was given by God, as the Christians and the Turks believe. All of these deny the Law of the Torah."

Zohar (I, 25a) it says:
"The People of the Earth are idolaters, and it has been written about them:
Let them be wiped off the face of the earth. Destroy the memory of the Amalekites. They are with us still in this Fourth Captivity, namely, the Princes [of Rome] . . . who are really Amalakites."

For if they are allowed to live, the hope of the liberation of the Jews is in vain, and their prayers for release from this Fourth Captivity are of no avail. In
Zohar (I, 219B) it says:
"It is certain that our captivity will last until the princes of the gentiles who worship idols are destroyed."
And again in
Zohar (II, 19a) it says:
"Rabbi Jehuda said: Come and see how it is; how the princes have assumed power over Israel and the Israelites make no outcry. But their rejoicing is heard when the prince falls. It is written that: the King of the Egyptians died and soon the children of Israel were released from captivity; they cried out and their voice ascended to God."

They call it the Kingdom of Esau, and of the Edomites, the Kingdom of Pride, the Wicked Kingdom, Impious Rome. The Turkish Empire is called the Kingdom of the Ismaelites which they do not wish to destroy. The Kingdom of Rome, however, must be exterminated, because when corrupt Rome is destroyed, salvation and freedom will come to God's Chosen People.
Rabbi David Kimchi writes as follows in
"What the Prophets foretold about the destruction of Edom in the last days was intended for Rome, as Isaiah explains (ch. 34, 1):
Come near, ye nations, to hear . . . For when Rome is destroyed, Israel shall be redeemed."
Rabbi Abraham also, in his book
Tseror Hammor, section Schoftim, says the same:
"Immediately after Rome is destroyed we shall be redeemed."

Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth) it says:
"Even the best of the
Goim should be killed"
The Schulchan Arukh, after the words of
Iore Dea (158, 1) that those of the Akum who do no harm to Jews are not to be killed, namely those who do not wage war against Israel, thus explains the word Milchamah - war:
"But in time of war the
Akum are to be killed, for it is written: 'The good among the Akum deserve to be killed, etc.'"

Speher Or Israel (177b) it says:
"Take the life of the Kliphoth and kill them, and you will please God the same as one who offers incense to Him."
And in
Ialkut Simoni (245c. n. 772) it says:
"Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God."

Zohar (III, 227b) the Good Pastor says:
"The only sacrifice required is that we remove the unclean from amongst us."
Zhoar (II, 43a), explaining the precept of Moses about the redemption of the first born of an ass by offering a lamb, says:
"The ass means the non-Jew, who is to be redeemed by the offering of a lamb, which is the dispersed sheep of Israel. But if he refuses to be redeemed, then break his skull....They should be taken out of the book of the living, for it is said about them: He who sins against me, I shall take out of the book of life."

Zohar (I, 38b, and 39a) it says:
"In the palaces of the fourth heaven are those who lamented over Sion and Jerusalem, and all those who destroyed idolatrous nations...and those who killed off people who worship idols are clothed in purple garments so that they may be recognized and honored."

Hilhoth Akum (X, 1) it says:
"Do not eat with idolaters, nor permit them to worship their idols; for it is written:
Make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them (Deuter. ch. 7, 2). Either turn away from their idols or kill them."

Ibidem (X, 7):
"In places where Jews are strong, no idolater must be allowed to remain..."

Choschen Hamm. (338, 16) it says:
"All the inhabitants of a city are obliged to contribute to the expense of killing a traitor, even those who have to pay other taxes."

Pesachim (49b) it says:
"Rabbi Eliezer said: It is permitted to cut off the head of an 'idiot' [one of the people of the Earth] on the feast of the Atonement when it falls on the Sabbath. His disciples said to him: Rabbi, you should rather say
to sacrifice. But he replied: By no means, for it is necessary to pray while sacrificing, and there is no need of prayers when you behead someone."

Thus the Jews picture their Messiah and Liberator whom they expect, as a persecutor who will inflict great calamities upon non-Jews. The Talmud lists three great evils which will come upon the world when the Messiah comes. In
Schabbath (118a) it says:
"Whoever eats three meals on the Sabbath shall be saved from the three evils: from the punishments of the Messiah, from the pain of hell and from the war of Magog; for it is written:
Behold, I shall send you Elias the Prophet before the coming of the 'Day' of the Lord, etc.*

"pour out thy anger upon nations that know thee not, and upon the kingdoms which do not invoke thy name; Pour out thy indignation upon them, and let thy wrathful anger take hold of them; Persecute and destroy them in anger from under the heavens of the Lord."

They also pray as follows:
"How long will thy strength remain captive and thy beauty lie under the hand of the oppressor? O God! Show forth thy strength and thy zeal against our enemies; break their strength and let them be confounded..."

And again:
"Cut off the hope of the unjust; let all heretics perish at once; root out, break up and destroy the Proud Kingdom; hasten to make all peoples subject in our days."

* * *

At that very same time, on Good Friday, that "Prince of the Proud Empire" of Rome, the Pope, prays, and orders everyone in the world to pray for all "heretics" and those who are "lost", as follows:
"Let us pray for the perfidious Jews: that the Lord our God may take away the veil from their hearts, that they may acknowledge Jesus Christ our Lord.
"Omnipotent and Eternal God, who does not even exclude Jewish perfidy from thy mercy: hear our prayers which we offer for the blindness of that people, that, having recognized the light of thy truth, which is Christ, they may come out of their darkness, Through Jesus Christ our Lord . . ."


Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian Talmud listed the first six commandments as prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, and robbery and the positive command to establish courts of justice (with all that this implies). After the Flood a seventh commandment, given to Noah, forbade the eating of flesh cut from a living animal (Gen. 9:4). Though the number of laws was later increased to 30 with the addition of prohibitions against castration, sorcery, and other practices, the "seven laws," with minor variations, retained their original status as authoritative commandments and as the source of other laws. As basic statutes safeguarding monotheism and guaranteeing proper ethical conduct in society, these laws provided a legal framework for alien residents in Jewish territory. Maimonides thus regarded anyone who observed these laws as one "assured of a portion in the world to come." Throughout the ages scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept in international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all."

And your President, George W. Bush the Skull and Bonesman, the man of Dan, of the order of Solomon the apostate, the son of a whoremonger who set forth by un-constitutional Executive Order the Laws of the Rabbis and the Good Judge Alfred T. Goodwin have sold the American Christians, out and unto Baal 


Rev. I. B. Pranaitis

Many passages in the Talmudic books treat of the birth, life, death, and teachings of Jesus Christ. He is not always referred to
by the same name, however, but is diversely called "That Man," "A Certain One," "The Carpenter's Son," "The One Who Was Hanged," etc.

1. The real name of Christ in Hebrew is Jeschua Hanotsri - Jesus the Nazarene. He is called Notsri from the city of Nazareth in which he was brought up. Thus in the Talmud Christians also are called Notsrim - Nazarenes.
Since the word Jeschua means "Savior," the name Jesus rarely occurs in the Jewish books. It is almost always abbreviated to Jeschu, which is maliciously taken as if it were composed of the initial letters of the three words Immach SCHemo Vezikro -"May his name and memory be blotted out."

2. In the Babylonian Talmud Christ is called Otho Isch - "That man," i.e. the one who is known to all. In the tract Abhodah Zarah, 6a, we read: "He is called a Christian who follows the false teachings of that man, who taught them to celebrate the feast on the first day of the Sabbath, that is, to worship on the first day after the Sabbath"

3. Elsewhere he is simply called Peloni - "A Certain One." In Chagigah, 4b, we read: "Mary...the mother of a certain one, of whom it is related in Schabbath..." That this Mary is none other than the mother of Jesus will be shown later.

4. Out of contempt, Jesus is also called Naggar bar naggar - "the carpenter son of a carpenter", also Ben charsch etaim -"the son of a wood worker."

5. He is also called Talui - "The one who was hanged." Rabbi Samuel, the son of Mair, in the Hilch. Akum of Maimonides, refers to the fact that it was forbidden to take part in the Christian feats of Christmas and Easter because they were celebrated on account of him who was hanged. And Rabbi Aben Ezra, in a commentary on Genes. also calls him Talui, whose image the Emperor Constantine reproduced on his banner. " the days of Constantine, who made a change of religion and placed the figure of the one who was hanged on his banner."

The Talmud teaches that Jesus Christ was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation; that he had the soul of Esau; that he was a fool, a conjurer, a seducer; that he was crucified, buried in hell and set up as an idol ever since by his followers.

The following is narrated in the Tract Kallah, 1b:
"Once when the Elders were seated at the Gate, two young men passed by, one of whom had his covered, the other with his head bare.Rabbi Eliezer remarked that the one in his bare head was illegitimate, a mamzer. Rabbi Jehoschua said that he was conceived during menstruation, ben niddah. Rabbi Akibah, however, said that he was both. Whereupon the others asked Rabbi Akibah why he dared to contradict his colleagues. He answered that he could prove what he said. He went therefore to the boy's mother whom he saw sitting in the market place selling vegetables and said to her: "My daughter, if you will answer truthfully what I am going to ask you, I promise that you will be saved in the next life." She demanded that he would swear to keep his promise, and Rabbi Akibah did so -but with his lips only, for in his heart he invalidated his oath. Then he said:
"Tell me, what kind of son is this of yours"? To which she replied: "The day I was married I was having menstruation, and because of this my husband left me. But an evil spirit came and sleptwith me and from this intercourse my son was born to me." Thus it was proved that this young man was not only illegitimate but also conceived during the menstruation of his mother.
And when his questioners heard this they declared: "Great indeed was Rabbi Akibah when he corrected his Elders"! And they exclaimed: "Bleddes be the Lord God of Israel who revealed his secret to Rabbi Akibah the son of Joseph"!
That the Jews understand this story to refer to Jesus and his mother, Mary, is clearly demonstrated in their book Toldath Jeschu -  "The Generations of Jesus" - where the birth of our Savior is narrated in almost the same words.
Another story of this kind is narrated in Sanhedrin, 67a:
"Of all who are guilty of death by the Law, he alone is caught by a ruse. How is it done? They light a candle in an inner room and place witnesses in an adjoining room outside where they can see him and hear his voice, but where they cannot be seen
by him. Then the one whom he tried to seduce says to him "Please repeat here privately what you told me before." If the seducer repeats what he said, the others ask him "But how shall we leave our God who is in heaven and serve idols?" If the seducer repents, then all is well. But if he says "This is our duty and it is right for us to do so," then the witnesses outside, who have heard him, bring him before the judge and stone him to death. This is what they did to the son of Stadi in Lud, and they hanged him on the eve of the Passover. Forthis son of Stada was the son of Pandira. For Rabbi Chasda tells us that Pandira was the husband of Stada, his mother, and he lived during the time Paphus the son of Jehuda. But his mother was stada, Mary of Magdala (a ladies' hairdresser) who, as it is said in Pumbadita, deserted her husband."
The meaning of this is that his Mary was called Stada, that is, a prostitute, because, according to what was taught at Pumbadita, she left her husband and commited adultery. This is also recorded in the Jerusalem Talmud and by Maimonides.
That the mention here is of Mary, the mother of Jesus, is verified in the Tract Chagigah, 4b:
"When Rabbi Bibhai was visited once by the Death Angel (the devil), the latter said to his assistant: "Go and bring to me Mary the hairdresser" (that is, kill her). He went and brought Mary the children's hairdresser - in place of the other Mary."
A marginal note explains this passage as follows:
"This story of Mary the Ladies' hairdresser happened under the Second Temple. She was the mother of Peloni, "that man," as he is called in the tract Schabbath." In Schabbath the passage referred to says:
"Rabbi Elizer said to the Elders: "Did not the son Stada practice Egyptian magic by cutting it into his flesh?" They replied: "He was a fool, and we do not pay attention to what fools do. The son of Stada, Pandra's son, etc." as above in Sanhedrin, 67a.
This magic of the son of Stada is explained as follows in the book Beth Jacobh, fol. 127 a:
"The Magi, before they left Egypt, took special care not to put their magic in writing lest other peoples might come to learn it. But he devised a new way by which he inscribed it on his skin, or made cuts in his skin and inserted it there and which, when the wounds healed up, did not show what they meant."
Buxtorf says:
"There is little doubt who this Ben Stada was, or who the Jews understood him to be. Although the Rabbis in their additions to the Talmud try to hide their malice and say that it is not Jesus Christ, their deceit is plainly evident, and many things prove that they wrote and understood all these things about him. In the first place, they also call him the son of Pandira. Jesus the Nazarene is thus called in other passages of the Talmud where express mention is made of Jesus the son of Pandira. St. John Damascene also, in his Genealogy of Christ, mentions Panthera  and the Son of Panthera. "Secondly, this Stada is said to be Mary, and this Mary the mother of Peloni "that certain one," by which without doubt Jesus is meant. For in this way they were accustomed to cover up his name because they were afraid to mention it. If we had copies of the original manuscripts they would certainly prove this. And this also was the name of the mother of Jesus the Nazarene.
"Thirdly, he is called the Seducer of the People. The Gospels testify that Jesus was called this by the Jews, and their writings to this day are proof that they still call him by this name.
"Fourthly, he is called "the one who was hanged," which clearly refers to the crucifixion of Christ, especially since a reference to the time "on the eve of the Passover" is added, which coincides with the time of the crucifixion of Jesus. In Sanhedrin they wrote as follows:
"On the eve of the Passover they hanged Jesus"
"Fifthly, as to what the Jerusalem Talmud says about the two disciples of the Elders who were sent as witnesses to spy on him, and who were afterwards brought forward as witnesses against him: This refers to the two "false witnesses" of whom the Evangelists Matthew and Luke make mention.
"Sixthly, concerning what they say about the son of Stada that he practiced Egyptian magical arts by cutting into his flesh: the same accusation is made against Christ in their hostile book Toldoth Jeschu.
"Lastly, the time corresponds. For it is said that this son of Stada lived in the days of Paphus the son of Jehuda, who was a contemporary of  Rabbi Akibah. Akibah, however, lived at the time of the Ascension of Christ, and for some time after. Mary is also said to have lived under the Second Temple. All this clearly proves that they secretly and blasphemously understand this son of Stada to be Jesus Christ the son of Mary.
"Other circumstances may seem to contradict this. But that is nothing new in Jewish writings and is done on purpose so that Christians may not easily detect their trickery."

2. Furthermore, "In the secret books, which are not permitted to fall easily into the hands of Christians, they say that the soul of Esau came into Christ, that he was therefore evil and that he was Esau himself."

3. By some he is called a FOOL and INSANE
In Schabbath, 104b:
"They, [the Elders] said to him [Eliezer]: "He was a fool, and no one pays attention to fools."

In the infamous book Toldoth Jeschu, our Savior is blasphemed as follows:
"And Jesus said: Did not Isaiah and David, my ancestors, prophesy about me? The Lord said to me, thou art my son, today I have begotten thee, etc. Likewise in another place: The Lord said to my Lord, sit thou at my right hand. Now I ascend to my father who is in heaven and will sit at his right hand, which you will see with your own eyes. But you, Judas, will never reach that high. Then Jesus pronounced the great name of God (IHVH) and continued to do so until a wind came and took him up between earth and sky. Judas also pronounced the name of God and he likewise was taken up by the wind. In this way they both floated around in the air to the amazement of the onlookers. Then Judas, again pronouncing the Divine Nane, took hold of
Jesus and pushed him down to earth. But Jesus tried to do the same to Judas and thus they fought together. And when Judas saw he could not win out over the works of  Jesushe pissed on Jesus, and both thus being unclean they fell to earth; nor could they use the Divine name again until they had washed themselves."
Whether those who believe such devilish lies deserve greater hatred or pity, I cannot say.

In another place in the same book it is related that in the house of the Sanctuary there was a stone which the Patriarch Jacob anointed with oil. On this stone were carved the tetragrammatic letters of the Name (IHVH), and if anyone could learn from them he could destroy the world. They therefore decreed that no one must learn them, and they placed two dogs upon two iron columns before the Sanctuary so that if anyone should learn them the dogs would bark at him coming out and he would forget the letters through fear. Then it is related: "Jesus came and entered, learned the letters and wrote them down on parchment. Then he cut into the flesh of his thigh and inserted them there, and having pronounced the name, the wound healed."

In the Tract Sanhedrin (103a) the words of Psalm XCI, 10: "No plague shall come near thy dwelling," are explained as follows:
"That thou mayest never have a son or a disciple who will salt his food so much that he destroys his taste in public, like Jesus the Nazarene."
To salt one's food too much or to destroy one's taste, is proverbially said of one who corrupts his morals or dishonors himself, or who falls into heresy and idolatry and openly preaches it to others.

In the same book Sanhedrin (107b) we read:
"Mar said: Jesus seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel."

Finally as punishment for his crimes and impiety, he suffered an ignominious death by being hanged on a cross on the eve of the Passover (as we have seen above).

The book Zohar, III, (282), tells us that Jesus died like a beast and was buried in that "dirt heap...where they throw the dead  odies of dogs and asses, and where the sons of Esau [the Christians] and of Ismael [the Turks], also Jesus and Mahommed, uncircumcized and unclean like dead dogs, are buried."

George El. Edzard, in his book Avoda Sara, quotes the following words of the commentator on the Hilkoth Akum (V,3) of
"In many passages of the Talmud mention is made of Jesus the Nazarene and of his disciples, and that the Gentiles believe that there is no other God besides him. In the book Chizzuk Emunah, part I, ch. 36, we read: "The Christians build up an argument from this [Zachary XII, 10] and say: Behold how thew Prophet testified that in future ages the Jews would would lament and weep because they crucified and killed the Messiah who was sent to them; and to prove that he meant Jesus the Nazarene, possessing both the divine and human nature, they quote the words: And they looked upon him whom they transfixed and they wept over him as a mother over her first born child.""
Maimonides attempts to prove how much Christians err in worshipping Jesus in his book Hilkoth Melakhim (IX, 4): "If all the things he did had prospered, if he had rebuilt the Sanctuary in its place, and had gathered together the dispersed tribes of Israel, then he would certainly be the Messiah....But if so far hew has not done so and if he was killed, then it is clear he was not the Messiah whom the Law tells us to expect. He was similar to all the good and upright rulers of the House of David who died, and whom the Holy and Blessed Lord raised up for no other reason but to prove to many, as it is said (in Dan. XI, 35):
And some of them who understand shall fall, to try and to purge them and to make them white, even till the end of time, because the appointed time is not yet. 

Daniel also prophesied about Jesus the Nazarene who thought he was the Christ, and who was put to death by the judgment of the Senate: (Dan. V.14): ...and the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fail.
What could be plainer? For all the Prophets said that the Christ would set Israel free, would bring it salvation, restore its dispersed peoples and confirm their laws. But he was the cause of the destruction of Israel and caused the rest of them to be dispersed and humiliated, so that the Law was changed and the greater part of the world was seduced to worship another God. Truly no one can understand the designs of the Creator, nor are his ways our ways. For all that has been built up by Jesus the Nazarene, and by the Turks who came after him, tend only to prepare the way for the coming of Christ the King, and to prepare the whole world equally for the service of the Lord, as it is said: For then I shall give a clean moth to all peoples that all may call upon the name of the Lord, and bow down in unison before him. How is this being accomplished? Already the whole world is filled with the praise of Christ, the Law and the Commandments, and his praises have spread to far distant lands and to peoples whose hearts and bodies are uncircumcized. These discuss with one another about the Law that was destroyed - some saying that the commandments were once true, but have ceased to exist; others that there is a great mystery about it, that the Messiah-King has come and that their doctrine has revealed it. But when the Christ truly comes and is successful, and is raised up and exalted, then everything will be changed and these things will be shown to be false and vain."

In the Tract Abhodah Zarah, (21a Toseph), we read:
"It is of importance to inquire the reasons why men nowadays even sell  and rent their houses to Gentiles. Some say this is legal because it is said in Tosephta: No one shall rent his house to a gentile either here [in the land of Israel] or elsewhere because it is known that he will bring an idol into it. It is nevertheless allowed to rent them stables, barns and lodging houses, even though it is known that they will bring idols into them. The reason is because a distinction can be made between a place into which an idol will be carried in order to leave it there permanently, and a place where it will not be left permanently, in which case it is allowed. And since the gentiles, among whom we now live, do not bring their idol into their homes to leave it there permanently, but only for a time - while someone is dead in the house or when someone is dying, nor do they even perform any
religious rites there - it is therefore permitted to sell and rent them houses."
Rabbi Ascher, in his Commentary on Abhodah Zarah (83d) speaks not less clearly on this matter: "Today it is permitted to rent houses to Gentiles because they bring their idol into them only for a time, when somebody is sick." And in the same place he says "Today they have a practice of incensing their idol.""
All this, and much more like it, proves beyond a doubt that when the Rabbis speak of the idols of the Gentiles among whom they lived at that time, when no idols were worshipped, they clearly meant the Christian "idol," namely, the image of Christ on the crucifix and the Holy Communion.

In Jewish writings there is no directly corresponding word for the Christian Cross. The cross T on which those condemned to death were crucified, was called Tau by the Phoenicians and the Hebrews, and this name and sign for it was afterwards taken over into the alphabet of the Jews and of the Greeks and the Romans. The Cross honored by the Christians, however, is called by the following names:
1. Tsurath Haattalui - the image who was hanged.
2. Elil - vanity, idol.
3. Tselem - image. Hence the Crusaders in Jewish books are called Tsalmerim (ein Tsalmer)
4. Scheti Veerebh - warp and woof, which is taken from the textile art.
5. Kokhabh - star; on account of the four rays emanating from it.
6. Pesila - a sculpture, a carven idol.
But whenever it is mentioned it is always in the sense of an idol or of something despicable, as can be seen from the following
In Orach Chaiim, 113,8:
"If a Jew when praying should meet a Christian [Akum] carrying a star [a crucifix] in his hand, even if he has come to a place in his prayer where it is necessary to bow down to worship God in his heart, he must not to so lest he should seem to bow down
before an image."
In Iore Dea, 150,2:
"Even if a Jew should get a splinter in his foot in front of an idol, or if he should drop his money before it, he must not stoop down to remove the splinter or to gather his money lest he should seem to adore it. But he should either sit down or turn his back or his side to the idol and then remove the splinter."
But whenever it is not possible for a Jew to turn away like this, the following rule must be observed (in Iore Dea, 3, Hagah):
"It is not permitted to bow down or to remove one's hat before princes or priests who wear a cross on their dress, as is their custom. Care must be taken, however, not to be noticed in failing to do so. For instance, one can throw some coins on the ground and stoop down to pick them up before they pass by. In this way it is permitted to bow down or to remove one's hat before them." A distinction is also made between a cross which is venerated and a cross which is worn around the neck as a souvenir or as an ornament. The former is to be regarded as an idol, but not necessarily the latter. In Iore Dea, 141, 1, Hagah,
it says:
"The image of a cross, before which they bow down, is to be treated as an idol, and it is not to be used until it is destroyed.
However, a 'warp and woof' if hung around the neck as a souvenir is not to be regarded as an idol and can be used."
The sign of the cross made with the hand, by which Christians are wont to bless themselves, is called in Jewish "the moving of the fingers here and there" (hinc et hinc).

The Seducer and Idolator could teach nothing but falsehood and heresy which was irrational and impossible to observe.

In Abhodah Zarah (6a) it says:
"A Nazarene is one who follows the false teachings of that man who taught them to worship on the first day of the Sabbath."

In the same book Abohah Zar. (Ch.I, 17a Toseph) mention is made of the heresy of James. A little further on (27b) we learn that this James was none other than the disciple of Jesus:
"...James Sekhanites, one of the disciples of Jesus, of whom we spoke in chapter 1."
But James taught, not his own doctrine, but that of Jesus.

The author of Nizzachon argues as follows on this point:
"A written law of the Christians is: If a Jew strike you on one cheek, turn the other also to him and do not in any way return the blow.And ch. VI, v. 27 says: Love your enemies; do good to them who hate you; bless them who curse you and pray for those who do you harm; unto him who strikes you on one cheek offer him the other. To him who takes away thy cloak
do not forbid him to take thy coat also, etc. The same is found in Matthew ch. V, v.39. But I have never seen any Christian keep this law, nor did Jesus himself behave as he taught others to do. For we find in John ch XVIII, v22, that when someone struck him on the face, he did not turn the other cheek, but became angry on account of this one stroke and asked "Why do you strike me"? Likewise in the Acts of the Apostles, ch.XXIII, v. 3, we read: that when the High Priest ordered them that stood by to strike him on the mouth, Paul did not turn the other cheek; he cursed him saying "God shall smite thee thou whited wall, etc." This is contrary to their beliefs and destroys the foundation upon which their religion rests, for they boast that the law of Jesus is easy to observe. If Paul himself, who may be called the Dispenser of Jesus, could not preserve the precept of Jesus,
who among the others who believe in him can prove to me that he can do so?"
The author, however, who had the Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles under his hand, could not have failed to understand in what sense Christ commanded his followers to turn the other cheek to him who would strike them, since in another place he commanded his followers to cut off a hand or an arm, and to pluck out an eye if these should scandalize them. No one who has had the least acquaintance with the Holy Scriptures ever thought that these commands should be taken literally . Only deep malice and ignorance of the times in which Jesus lived can explain why the Jews, even to this day, use these passages to detract from the teachings of Jesus Christ.


Rev. I. B. Pranaitis

The Babylonian Talmud on



There are three things to be considered in this chapter:

1. The names by which Christians are called in the Talmud.
2. What kind of people the Talmud pictures Christians to be.
3. What the Talmud says about the religious worship of the Christians.

Article I. - The Names Given to Christians in the Talmud

As in our languages Christians take their name from Christ, so in the language of the Talmud Christians are called Notsrim, from Jesus the Nazarene. But Christians are also called by the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-Jews: Abhodah Zarah, Akum, Obhde Elilim, Minim, Nokhrim, Edom, Amme Haarets, Goim, Apikorosim, Kuthrim.

1. Abhodah Zarah - Strange worship, idolatry. The Talmudic Tract on Idolatry is thus entitled: Obhde Abhodah Zarah - Idol Worshippers. That Abhodah Zarah really means the cult of idols is clear from the Talmud itself: "Let Nimrod come and testify that Abraham was not a server of Abhodah Zarah ." But in these days of Abraham there existed no strange cult either of the Turks or the Nazarenes, but only the worship of the true God and idolatry. In Schabbath (ibid. 82a), it says:
"Rabbi Akibah says: How do we know that Abhodah Zarah, like an unclean woman, contaminates those who subscribe to it?
Because Isaiah says: Thou shalt cast them away like a menstruation cloth; and shalt say unto it, Get thee hence."
In the first part of this verse mention is made of idols made from gold and silver.
The learned Maimonides also clearly demonstrates that the Jews regarded Christians as Abhodah Zarah. In Perusch(78c) he says: "And be it known that Christian people who follow Jesus, although their teachings vary, are all worshippers of idols
(Abhodah Zarah)."

2. Akum - This word is made up of the initial letters of the words Obhde Kokhabkim U Mazzaloth - worshippers of stars and
planets. It was thus that the Jews formerly styled the Gentiles who lacked all knowledge of the true God. Now, however, the word Akum in Jewish books, especially in the Schulkhan Arukh, is applied to Christians. This is evident from numerous
passages: In the Orach Chaiim (113,8) those who use a cross are called Akum. In the Iore Dea (148, 5, 12), those who celebrate the feasts of Christmas and New Year, eight days afterwards, are called worshippers of the stars and planets: "Thus if a gift is sent to the Akum, even in these times, on the eighth day after Christmas, which they call the New Year," etc.

3. Obhde Elilim - Servers of idols. This name has the same meaning as Akum. Non-Jews are frequently called by this name. In the Orach Chaiim, for example (215, 5), it says:
"A blessing should not be pronounced over incense which belongs to the servers of idols."
But at the same time when the Schulkhan Arukh was written there were no worshippers of the stars and planets (Akum); there were no 'servers of idols' among those who lived with the Jews. Thus, for example, the author of the Commentary on the Schulkhan Arukh (entitled Magen Abraham), Rabbi Calissensis who died in Poland in 1775, in note 8, on No. 244 of the Orach Chaiim (where it is allowed to finish a work on the Sabbath with the help of an Akum) says: "Here in our city the question is raised about the price of hiring worshippers of the stars and planets who sweep the public streets when they work on the Sabbath."

4. Minim - Heretics. In the Talmud those who possess books called the Gospels are heretics. Thus in Schabbath (116a) it says: "Rabbi Meir calls the books of the Minim Aven Gilaion [iniquitous volumes] because they call them Gospels."

5. Edom - Edomites. Rabbi Aben Ezra, when he speaksabout the Emperor Constantine who changed his religion and placed the image of him who was hanged on his banner, adds: "Rome therefore is called the Kingdom of the Edomites."
And Rabbi Bechai, in his Kad Hakkemach (fol. 20a, on Isaiah, ch. LXVI, 17) writes:
"They are called Edomites who move their fingers 'here and there'" (who make the sign of the cross).
Likewise Rabbi Bechai, commenting on the words of Isaiah (loc. cit.), "those who eat the flesh of swine" adds: "These are the Edomites." Rabbi Kimchi, however, calls them "Christians." And Rabbi Abarbinel, in his work Maschima Ieschua (36 d) says: "The Nazarenes are Romans, the sons of Edom."

6. Goi - Race, or people. The Jews also call a man a Goi - a gentile; they call a gentile woman a Goiah. Sometimes, but very rarely, Israelites are called by this name. It is mostly applied to non-Jews, or idolators. In Jewish books which treat of Idolatry,
worshippers of idols are often called by this single word Goi. For this reason, in more recent editions of the Talmud the use of the word Goi is purposely avoided and other words for non-Jews are substituted.
It is well known that in the Jewish language, the Jews call Christians among whom they live, Goim. Nor do the Jews deny this.Sometimes in their popular magazines they say that this word means nothing harmful or evil. But the contrary can be seen in their books written in the Hebrew language. For instance, in Choschen Hammischpat (34, 22), the name Goi is used in a depraved sense:
"Traitors and Epicureans and Apostates are worse than Goim"

7. Nokhtrim - strangers, foreigners. This name is used for all who are not Jews, and therefore for Christians.

8. Amme Haarets - People of the earth, idiots. There are some who say that people of other races are not meant by this, but only crude and uneducated people. There are passages, however, which leave no doubt about the matter. In the Holy Scripture, Book of Esra, ch. X, 2, we read: We have sinned against our God, and have taken strange wives [nokhrioth] of the people of the earth. That people of the earth denotes idolators is clear from Zohar, I, 25a: "The People of the earth - Obhde Abhodah Zarah, idolaters.

9. Basar Vedam - Flesh and blood; carnal men who are destined to perdition and who can have no communion with God.
That Christians are flesh and blood, is proved from the prayer book:
"Whoever meets a wise and educated Christian can say: Blessed art thou O Lord, King of the Universe, who dispenseth of thy wisdom to Flesh and Blood," etc.
Likewise in another prayer, in which they ask God soon to restore the kingdom of David and to send Elias and the Messiah,
etc.,  they ask him to take away their poverty so that they will have no need to accept gifts from "flesh and blood," nor to trade with them, nor to seek wages from them.

10. Apikorosim - Epicureans. All are called by this name who do not observe God's precepts, as well as all those, even Jews themselves, who express private judgments in matters of faith. How much more, therefore, Christians!

11. Kuthim - Samaritans. But since there are no longer any Samaritans, and since there are many references in recent Jewish books to Samaritans, who can doubt that this does not mean the Christians?
Furthermore, in this matter of naming those who are not Jews, it is to be particularly noted that Jewish writings apply these names indiscriminately and promiscuously when they speak of the same thing, and almost in the same words. For instance, in the Tract Abhodah Zarah (25b) the word Goi is employed, but in the Schulkhan Arukh (Iore Dea 153, 2) Akum is used.
Kerithuth (6b) uses Goim; Jebhammoth (61a) uses Akum; Abhodah Zar. (2a) uses Obhde Elilim; Thoseph uses Goim
and Obhde Ab., Choschen Ham (Venetian ed.) uses Kuthi; (Slav. ed.) Akum. And many more instances could be quoted.
Maimonides in his book on Idolatry indiscriminately calls all the following idolators: Goim, Akum, Obhde Kokhabhim, Obhde Elilim, etc.

Article II. - What the Talmud Teaches About Christians

In the preceding chapter we saw what the Jews think of the Founder of the Christian religion, and how much they despise his name. This being so, it would not be expected that they would have any better opinion about those who follow Jesus the Nazarene. In fact, nothing more abominable can be imagined than what they have to say about Christians. They say that they are idolaters, the worst kind of people, much worse than the Turks, murderers, fornicators, impure animals, like dirt, unworthy to be called men, beasts in human form, worthy of the name of beasts, cows, asses, pigs, dogs, worse than dogs; that they propagate after the manner of beasts, that they have diabolic origin, that their souls come from the devil and return to the devil in hell after death; and that even the body of a dead Christian is nothing different from that of an animal.

Since Christians follow the teachings of that man, whom the Jews regard as a Seducer and an Idolater, and since they worship him as God, it clearly follows that they merit the name of idolater, in no way different from those among whom the Jews lived before the birth of Christ, and whom they taught should be exterminated by every possible means.

see:  "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Babylonian Talmudic Zionism"

This is best demonstrated by the names they give Christians, and by the unmistakable words of Maimonides which prove that all who bear the name of Christian are idolaters. And anyone who examines Jewish books which speak of the "Worshippers of the Stars and Planets," "Epicureans," "Samaritans," etc., cannot but conclude that these idolaters are none other than Christians.
The Turks are always called "Ismaelites," never idolaters.

Maimonides in Hilkoth Maakhaloth (ch. IX) says:
"It is not permitted to drink the wine of a stranger who becomes a convert, that is, one who accepts the seven precepts of Noah, but is permitted to gain some benefit from it. It is allowed to leave wine alone with him, but not to place it before him. The same is permitted in the case of all gentiles who are not idolaters, such as the Turks [Ismaelites]. A Jew, however, is not permitted to drink their wine, although he may use it to his own advantage."

In Abhodah Zarah (22a) it says:
"A Jew must not associate himself with gentiles because they are given to the shedding of blood."
Likewise in Iore Dea (153, 2): "An Israelite must not associate himself with the Akum [Christians] because they are given to the shedding of blood."
In the Abhodah Zarah (25b) it says: "The Rabbis taught: If a Goi joins an Israelite on the road, he [the Jew] should walk on his right side. Rabbi Ismael, the son of Rabbi Jochanan the nephew of Beruka, says: if he carries a sword, let the Jew walk on his right side. If the Goi carries a stick, the Jew should walk on his left side. If he is climbing a hill or descending a steep incline, the Jew must not go in front with the Goi behind, but the Jew must go behind and the Goi in front, nor must he stoop down in front of him for fear the Goi might
crack his skull. And if he should ask the Jew how far he is going, he should pretend he is going a long way, as Jacob our Father said to the impious Esau: until I come to my Lord in Seir (Gen. XXXIII, 14-17), but it adds: Jacob set out for Sukoth."

In Orach Chaiim (20, 2) it says:
"Do not sell your overcoat (Talith) with the fringes to an Akum, lest he should join up with a Jew on the road and kill him. It is also forbidden to exchange or lend your overcoat with a Gentile, except for a short time and when there is nothing to be feared from him."

In the Abhodah Zarah (15b) it says:
"Animals of the masculine sex must not be left in the barns of the Gentiles with their men, nor animals of the feminine sex with their women; much less must animals of the feminine sex be left with their men and of the masculine sex with their women. Nor must sheep be left to the care of their shepherds; nor must any intercourse be had with them; nor must children be given into their care to learn to read or to learn a trade."
In the same tract a little farther on (22a) it is explained why animals must not be allowed in the barns of Gentiles, and why Jews are not permitted to have sexual intercourse with them:
"Animals must not be allowed to go near the Goim, because they are suspected of having intercourse with them. Nor must women cohabit with them because they are over-sexed."
In fol. 22b of the same book the reason is given why animals especially of the feminine sex must be kept away from their women: "...because when Gentile men come to their neighbors' houses to commit adultery with their wives and do not find them at home, they fornicate with the sheep in the barns instead. And sometimes even when their neighbors' wives are at home, they prefer to fornicate with the animals; for they love the sheep of the Israelites more than their own women."
It is for the same reason that animals are not to be entrusted to Goi shepherds, nor children to their educators.

The Talmud gives two reasons why the Goim are unclean: because they eat unclean things, and because they themselves have not been cleansed (from original sin) on Mount Sinai. In Schabbath, (145b) it says:
"Why are the Goim unclean? Because they eat abominable things and animals that crawl on their belly."
Likewise in Abhodah Zarah, 22b:
"Why are the Goim unclean? Because they were not present at Mount Sinai. For when the serpent entered into Eve he infused her with uncleanness. But the Jews were cleansed from this when they stood on Mount Sinai; the Goim, however, who were not on Mount Sinaim were not cleansed."

"When ten persons are praying together in one place and they say Kaddisch, or Kedoschah, anyone, even though he does not belong there, may respond Amen. There are some, however, who say that no dung or Akum must be present."
In Iore Dea (198, 48) Hagah, it says: "When Jewish women come out of a bath they must take care to meet a friend first, and not something unclean or a Chrsitian.
For if so, a woman, if she wants to keep holy, should go back and bathe again." It is worthy of note that the following list of unclean things is a given in Biur Hetib, a commentary on the  Schulchan Arukh:
"A woman must wash herself again if she sees any unclean things, such as a dog, an ass, or People of the Earth; a Christian (Akum), a camel, a pig, a horse, and a leper.

In Kerithuth (6b p. 78) it says:
"The teaching of the Rabbis is: He who pours oil over a Goi, and over dead bodies is freed from punishment. This is true for an animal because it is not a man. But how can it be said that by pouring oil over a Goi one is freed from punishment, since a Goi is also a man? But this is not true, for it is written: Ye are my flock, the flock of my pasture are men (Ezechiel, XXXIV, 31).
You are thus called men, but the Goim are not called men." In the Tract Makkoth (7b) he is said to be guilty of killing "except when, if intending to kill an animal he kills a man by mistake, or intending to kill a Goi, he kills an Israelite."
In Orach Chaiim (225, 10) it says: "He who sees beautiful creatures, even though it be an Akum or an animal, let him say 'Blessed art thou Our Lord God, King of the Universe, who has placed such things on the earth!'"

In Midrasch Talpioth (fol. 225d) it says:
"God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel. But Akum were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved from this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him."
We can quote here also what is said in Orach Chaiim, 57, 6a: "If pigs are to be pitied when they suffer from disease, because their intestines are similar to ours, how much more should the Akum be pitied when thus affected."

In Zohar, II, (64b) it says:
"...People who worship idols, and who are called cow and ass, as it is written: I have a cow and an ass..."
Rabbi Bechai, in his book Kad Hakkemach, ch. I, beginning with the word Geulah - redemption - referring to Psalm 80, v.13: The boar out of the wood doth waste it, says:
"The letter ain is dropped [suspended] the same as these worshippers are followers of him who was suspended." Buxtorf (Lex.) says: "By wild pig the author here means the Christians who eat pork and, like pigs, have destroyed the vineyard of Israel, the City of Jerusalem, and who believe in the 'suspended' Christ. Else the letter ain is dropped in this word because they, as worshippers of Christ who was hanged, are also dropped." Rabbi Edels, in commenting on Kethuboth (110b) says:
"The Psalmist compares the Akum to the unclean beast in the woods."

Rabbi Schelomo Iarchi (Raschi), famous Jewish commentator, explaining the law of Moses (Deuter. XIV, 21) forbidding the eating of meat of wounded animals, but which must be given to the 'stranger in thy gates,' or which, according to Exodus (XXII, 30) is to be thrown to the dogs, has this to say:
"...for he is like a dog. Are we to take to word 'dog' here literally? By no means. For the text in speaking of dead bodies says, Or thou mayest sell it to an alien. This applies much more to the meat of wounded animals,  for which it is permitted to accept payment. Why therefore does the Scripture say it may be thrown to 'dogs?' In order to teach you that a dog is to be more respected than the Nokhri."

In the Sanhedrin (74b) Tosephoth, it says: "The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like that of a beast."
And in Kethuboth (3b) it says: "The seed of a Goi is worth the same as that of a beast."
Hence it is to be inferred that Christian marriage is not true marriage.
In Kidduschim (68a), it says: "...How do we know this? Rabbi Huna says: You can read: Remain here with the ass, that is, with a people like an ass. Hence it appears that they are not capable of contracting marriage."
And in Eben Haezer (44, 8):
"If a Jew enters into marriage with an Akum (Christian), or with his servant, the marriage is null. For they are not capable of entering into matrimony. Likewise if an Akum or a servant enter into matrimony with a Jew, the marriage is null."
In Zohar (II, 64b) it  says: "Rabbi Abba says: If only idolaters alone had sexual intercourse, the world would not continue to exist. Hence we are taught that a Jew should not give way to those infamous robbers. For if these propagate in greater numbers, it will be impossible for us to continue to exist because of them. For they give birth to sucklings the same as dogs."

In Zohar (I, 28b) we read:
"Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field, etc. (Genes. III, 1.) 'More subtle' that is towards evil; 'than all beasts' that is, the idolatrous people of the earth. For they are the children of the ancient serpent which seduced Eve."
The best argument used by the Jews to prove that Christians are of the race of the devil is the fact that they are uncircumcized.
The foreskin on non-Jews prevents them from being called the children of the Most High God. For by circumcision the name of God - Schaddai - is complete in the flesh of a circumcized Jew. The form of the letter Isch is in his nostrils, the letter Daleth in
his (bent) arm, and ain appears in his sexual organ by circumcision. In non-circumcized gentiles, therefore, such as Christians, there are only two letters, Isch and Daleth, which make the word Sched,

The teaching of the Jews is that God created two natures, one good and the other evil, or one nature with two sides, one clean and the other unclean. From the unclean side, called Keliphah - rind, or scabby crust - the souls of Christians are said to have come. 

In Zohar (I, 131a) it says:
"idolatrous people, however, since they exist, befoul the world, because their souls come out of the unclean side."
And in Emek Hammelech (23d) it says:
"The souls of the impious come from Keliphah, which is death and the shadows of death."
Zohar (I, 46b, 47a) goes to show that this unclean side is the left side, from which the souls of the Christians come:
"And he created every living thing, that is, the Israelites, because they are the children of the Most High God, and their holy souls come out from Him. But where do the souls of the idolatrous gentiles come from? Rabbi Eliezer says: from the left side,
which makes their souls unclean. They are therefore all unclean and they pollute all who come in contact with them."

The Elders teach that Abraham sits at the gate of Gehenna and prevents any circumcized person from entering there; but that all
the uncircumcized go down to hell.
In Rosch Haschanach (17a) it says:
"Heretics and Epicureans and Traitors go down into hell."

The bodies of Christians after death are called by the odious name of Pegarim, which is the word used in Holy Scripture for the
dead bodies of the damned and of animals, but never for the pious dead who are called Metim. Thus the Schulchan Arukh
orders that a dead Christian must be spoken of in the same way as a dead animal.
In Iore Dear (377, 1) it says:
"Condolences must not be offered to anyone on account of the death of his servants or handmaids. All that may be said is 'May
God restore your lost one, the same as we say to a man who has lost a cow or an ass.'"
Nor must Christians be avoided for seven days after they have buried  someone, as the law of Moses commands, since they
are not men; for the burial of an animal does not pollute one.
In Iebhammoth (61a) it says:
"The Nokhrim are not rendered unclean by a burial. For it is said: Ye are my sheep, the sheep of my pasture; ye are men.
You are thus called men, but not the Nokhrim."

Article III. - About Christian Rites and Worship

Since Christians are regarded by the Jews as idolators, all their forms of worship are idolatrous. Their priests are called priests
of Baal; their temples are called houses of lies and idolatry, and everything they contain, such as chalices, statues and books,
are regarded as made for the serving of idols; their prayers, both private and public, are sinful and offensive to God; and their
festivals are called days of evil.

The Talmud speaks of priests, the ministers of Christian worship, as idolatrous and belonging to the god Baal. They are also
called Komarim - Soothsayers; and also Galachim, the shaved, because they shave their heads, particularly the monks.
In Abhodah Zarah (14b) Toseph, it says:
"It is forbidden to sell books of the prophets to the soothsayers, since they may use them for their evil worship in their
idolatrous  temples. Those who do so sin against the law which forbids us to place an obstacle in the way of a blind person. It
is also forbidden to sell them to a Christian who is not shaved, for he is sure to give or sell them to one of them who is shaved."

A place of Christian worship is called (1) Beth Tilfah, a house of vanity and foolishness, in place of Beth Tefilah, a house of
prayer; (2) Beth Abhodha Zarah, a House of Idolatry; (3) Beth Hatturapi Schel Letsim, a house of Evil Laughter. ( So now you understand who pays Rodney Howard Brown and Kenneth Copeland)
In Abhodah Zarah (78) the Perusch of Maimonides, it says:
"Be it known to you that it is beyond a doubt forbidden by law to pass through a Christian city in which there is a house of
vanity, that is, a house of idolatry; much more to live therein. But we today, as punishment for our sins, are subject to them, and
are forced to live in their countries, as it was foretold in Deuteronomy (IV, 28): And there ye shall serve gods, the work of
men's hands, of wood and stone...Thus if it is allowed as predicted to pass around a Christian city, much more so must we
pass around an idolatrous temple; nor is it allowed us even to look inside and above all to enter in."
A Jew is forbidden not only to enter a Christian church, but even to go near it, except under certain circumstances.
In Iore Dea (142, 10) it says:
"It is forbidden to stand in the shadow of a house of idolatry, whether from the inside or the outside, for a distance of four
cubits from the front door. It is not forbidden, however, to stand under the shadows of the back of a church. Nor is the
shadow forbidden us if the church stands in a place where formerly there was public road, which was taken from the
community and the house of idolatry built upon it. For the road is still there. But if the house of idolatry  existed before the road,
it is not permitted to pass before it. There are some who say that it is forbidden to pass there in any case."
Neither is a Jew allowed to listen to, or admire the beautiful music of the churches. In Iore Dea (142, 15) it  says:
"It is forbidden to listen to the music if idolatrous worship, and to examine the statues of their idols; for even by looking at them
one can be influenced by the evil of idolatry. But one can look who does not intend to be so affected."
Likewise a Jew is not allowed to have a house near a church; nor is he allowed to rebuild a house which has been destroyed in
such a place. In Iore Dea (143, 1) it says:
"If a house near an idolatrous temple belonging to the Akum falls down, it must not be rebuilt. A Jew must remove it a certain
distance away if he wishes to rebuild it. But he must fill up the vacant space between his house and the church with bushes and
rubbish so that the space will not be used to extend the idolatrous temple."
Here may be added what a certain Rabbi Kelomimus said about a Christian church (in the book Nizzachon) to the Emperor
Henry III, who gave him permission to speak his opinion freely about the Basilica which he had recently built at Spires:
"After the Emperor Henry III, a very wicked man, had completed the building of that "Abyss," he sent for Rabbi Kelominus and said  to him: "I want to ask you, how does this Basilica which I have built compare with the magnificence of Solomon's
Temple, about which so many volumes have been written?" He replied: 'My Lord, if you will permit me that you will let me go
unharmed, I will tell you the truth about it.' The Emperor answered: 'I give you my word as a lover of the truth and as an
Emperor, that no harm shall come to you.' Then the Jew said: 'If you gathered together all you have spent so far, and added to
it all the silver and gold in your treasury, it would not suffice even to pay the workmen and craftsmen that Solomon employed; for it is written (Chron. II, ch 2): And Solomon told out threescore and ten thousand men to bear burdens, and fourscore
thousand to hew in the mountains, and three thousand and six hundred to oversee them. Eight years were spent in the
building of the Temple, much more than you spent in building this Tehon [Abyss]. And when Solomon had finished his Temple,
see what the Scripture says about it: The priests could not stand to minister by reason of the cloud; for the glory of God
had filled the House of the Lord (Chron. II, Ch. 5, 14). But if someone loaded an ass with putrid garbage and led it into this
abyss of yours, no one would notice the difference!' The Emperor Henry then replied:   'Were it not that I have sworn to let you
go unharmed, I would order your head cut off.'"

Chalises used in the Sacrifice of the mass are spoken of as vessels in which filth is offered up to the idol. Moses Kozzensis, in
Hilkoth Abhodah Zarah (10b) says:
"A Jew who buys Chalises of the Goi, which are broken and thrown away, it is not permitted to sell them again to them,
because their priest of Baal will use them in the worship of the idol."

The Talmud calls the books of the Christians Minim - heretical books - Siphre Debeth Abidan - Books of the House of
Perdition. The Talmud in particular speaks of the books of the Gospels. Thus in Schabbath (116a) Toseph:
"Rabbi Meir calls heretical books Aaven Gilaion (volumes of iniquity) because they call them Gospels."
And Rabbi Jochanan calls these books Aavon Gilaion, evil books. The Schulchan Arukh, Crakow edition, gives this name
as Aven Niktabh al Haggilaion - iniquity written in a book.
Buxtorf says: "In the Arukh there is a note Scheker Niktabh al Gilaion, which means, a lie written in a book."
All the Talmudists agree that the books of the Christians should be destroyed. They differ only as to what should be done with
the names of God contained in them. In Schabbath (116a) it says:
"The Glossaries of our own books and the books of the heretics are not to be saved from the flames, if they should catch fire
on the Sabbath day. Rabbi Jose, however, says: 'On festival days the divine names should be torn out of the books of the Christians and hidden away; what remains must be given to the flames.' But Rabbi Tarphon says: 'In order that I may be
remembered by my children, if those books should ever fall into my hands I would burn them together with the divine names
contained therein. For if one is chased by an assassin, or by a serpent, it would be better to take refuge in a pagan temple than
in one of theirs; because the Christians knowingly resist the truth, whereas the pagans do so unknowingly."

Christian prayers are called, not Tefillah, but Tiflah. They change the point and insert Iod, which makes it read to mean sin,
foolishness and transgression.

Christian festivals, especially Sunday, are called Ion Ed  - day of destruction, perdition, misfortune or calamity. They are also
simply called Iom Notsri - Christian Days. The word Ed rightly interpreted means misfortune or calamity, as appears from the
Gemarah and the Glossaries of Maimonides in Abhodah Zarah (2a):
"The word Edehem means the festivals of the Christians, since it is written (in Deuter. XXXII, 35): the day of their calamity."
Maimonides also says in Abhodah Zarah (78c):
"The words Edehem means the foolishness of their festivlas. It is the name for their despicable feast days which do not merit
the name of Moedim, for they are really vain and evil."
Baretenora also writes:


Lastly, the Talmud commands that Christians are to be killed without mercy. In the Abhodah Zarah (26b) it says:
"Heretics, traitors and apostates are to be thrown into a well and not rescued."
And in Choschen Hammischpat (388, 10) it says:
"A spy is to be killed, even in our days, wherever he is found. He may be killed even before he confesses. And even if
he admits that he only intended to do harm to somebody, and if the harm which he intended is not very great, it is
sufficient to have him  condemned to death. He must be warned, however, not to confess to this. But if he impudently says
'No, I will confess it!' then he must be killed, and the sooner the better. If there is no time to warn him, it is not necessary
to do so. There are some who say that a traitor is to be put to death only when it is impossible  to get rid of him by
mutilating him, that is, by cutting out his tongue or his eyes, but if this can be done he must not be killed, since he is not
any worse than others who persecute us."
And in Choschen Hamm. again (388, 15) it says:
"If it can be proved that someone has betrayed Israel three times, or has given the money of Israelites to the Akum, a way
must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."



The Mishnah is the early Talmud or the forerunner of the Talmud. To the Mishnah the rabbis later added the Gemara (rabbinical commentaries). Together these comprise the Talmud. Scholars will claim that the Talmud is partly a collection of oral traditions given by Moses which had not yet been written down in Jesus' time. However, Christ condemned the traditions of the Mishnah (early Talmud) and the Scribes and Pharisees who taught it, because the Talmud nullifies the teachings of Scripture. The warning of Jesus Christ about the traditions of men that make null and void the Word of God (Mark 7:1-13) is a direct reference to the Mishnah.


 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.


Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

Likewise, the commands found in Genesis 9 and Acts 15 are not the equivalent of the 7 Noahide Laws of the Kabbalist/Lubavitchers, nor does the context in which these commands appear have any correlation to the radical agenda of the movement promoting the Noahide Laws. The information I will be posting on the Kabbalistic movements within Judaism does NOT implicate true orthodox Judaism as a component of the Antichrist religion.  Rather, MYSTERY BABYLON of Revelation 17 will consist of the vast network of Mystery Religions covering the globe, of which many seek to identify with Judaism and Christianity as a covering for their sin.

In the course of this series, it will be seen that the Christian Church has been infiltrated by modern Judaizers who would commit believers to various obligations of their particular system of legalism. For those who would be His disciples, however, Jesus Christ enunciated the two greatest commandments which encompassed all the Law and the Prophets:

"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind... Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thy self." (Matt. 22:37,39) 

Mendel Menachem Schneerson

What is the primary mission for our generation to accomplish

The main avodah of this generation is to go out to the final war of the golus, to conquer and to purify all the gentile countries (such that "and kingship will be Hashem's," Ovadiah 1:21).


The Babylonian Talmudic Jewish Control of America

     The doctrine of the Seven Noahide Commandments brings the Jewish idea of unity to the world. In fact, the very idea of unity in religion originated with Judaism. (worldwide ecumenical movement) Whoever has this concept other than the Jews, got it from the Jews.1 And when we speak of unity, we mean both the unity of God and the unity of mankind. The unity of God means monotheism, and the unity of mankind means a world in which all people come to God in peace and harmony.

"Our" government under Presidents Reagan, Bush and Clinton, has provided, under the euphemism of education (for example, House Joint Resolution 173 and Public Law 102-14), a groundwork for the establishment of Talmudic "courts of justice" to be administered by disciples of Shneur Zalman's Chabad successor, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.

Thus, Alfred T. Goodwin

Mt:23:34: Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

 State Sanctioned Judaism.

Sponsor: Rep Michel, Robert H.(introduced 1/31/1991)
Latest Major Action: 3/20/1991 Became Public Law No: 102-14.
Title: To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".

Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court -- or a court appointed by Jewish authority --that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation 

"not subject to our jurisdiction"

 (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war. (Cf. Hilkhot Melakhim 8:9-10; 10:11. Also cf. Gerald J. Blidstein, "Holy War in Maimonidean Law," in Perspectives on Maimonides [Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991].

These courts are to be convened allegedly under the "Noahide Laws" (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah). The U.S. presidents and Congress urged the adoption of the "Noahide" Laws as interpreted by Chabad-Lubavitch Grand Rabbi Schneerson.

Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has compared this Public law 102-14 to the "first rays of dawn" which "evidence the rising of a still unseen sun." 

(The Coming Babylonian Talmudic god, Re)

The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order immediately preceding the universal reign of the Talmud.

It has to be understood that we are not dealing with the Noah of the Bible when the religion of Judaism refers to "Noahide law," but the Noahide law as understood and interpreted by the absolute system of falsification that constitutes the Talmud.

Under the Talmud's counterfeit Noahide Laws, the worship of Jesus is forbidden under penalty of death, since such worship of Christ is condemned by Judaism as idolatry. Meanwhile various forms of incest are permitted under the Talmudic understanding of the Noahide code. (Enziklopediya Talmudit, note 1, pp. 351-352).

The Talmud also states the penalty for disobedience: "One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation. (Sanh. 57A)"

(Talmud - Sukkah 52a). With the end of free will, the opportunity to earn reward and enhance one's portion in the World to Come will also cease -- forever.

Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

The Jewish people have the unique power of victory, to liberate the world from its current road to complete self-destruction. Since we are now in the last generation of the Jewish exile and the first generation of Moshiach, our actions are guaranteed to produce miraculous success. No longer must we labor without visible achievement, in the face of powerful opposition and persecution, today, even the smallest actions performed within the physical world will yield staggering results far beyond the laws of nature. Actions that would previously have required decades for success can now yield victory within months. But we must act.


Amalek (Christians who oppose) represents the ultimate barrier to the revelation of G-dliness within the physical world. Its descendants have, for thirty-three continuous centuries, carried on their scheming and machinations to rid the world of Jews and Jewish influence. The very presence of Torah in our realm represents an influence that refines and elevates the gentile nations and all physical elements, preparing for the day when Moshiach arrives to lead a purified world. The Amaleki conspire to send the Torah back into the heavens and reduce the world back to the darkest, most primitive state of idolatry and evil.

Torah teaches us that the literal descendants of Amalek have survived to the present day, hidden amongst the gentile nations, and that the passage of time has by no means weakened their hatred or their intent to erase Jewish influence from the world. They have been forced to bide their time, waiting for an opportunity to strike again; only Moshiach will be able to annihilate these wicked people.

Thank you Mr. George H. W. "Burning" Bush for delivering us to our Lord God, the Lord over All, Jesus Christ. May all the minions of Satan suffer the wrath of My Lord and burn for eternity along with Moshiach ben Satan, Lucifer the son of perdition, your god.


Furthermore, all non-Jews would have the legal status of ger toshav ("resident alien," cf. Alan Unterman, Dictionary of Jewish Lore and Legend [London: Thames and Hudson, 1991], p. 148), even in their own land; as for example in occupied Palestine where newly arrived Khazars from Russia have an automatic right to housing and citizenship, while two million Palestinian refugees who either fled or were expelled by the Israelis, are forbidden the right of return.

Resident alien status has been clearly delineated in scholarly articles in leading Jewish publications. For example, Hebrew University Professor Mordechai Nisan, basing his exposition on Maimonides, stated that a non-Jew permitted to reside in a land ruled by Jewish law "must accept paying a tax and suffering the humiliation of servitude."

If Gentiles refuse to live a life of inferiority, then this signals their rebellion and the unavoidable necessity of Jewish warfare against their very presence. [Cf. Mordechai Nisan, Kivunim (official publication of the World Zionist Organization), August, 1984, pp. 151-156].


If the Goyim worship after Jesus Christ the Lord God, I AM they shall be decapitated by the Law of Babylonian Talmudic Judaism imposed by president George H. Walker Bush, Skull and Bonesman in the order of Solomon the Moloch worshipping Apostate and Freemasonry.

Separation of Church and state, or do they truly mean separation of God the Most High and his saints? 


At a symposium ("Is Autonomy for Resident Aliens Feasible?") organized by Israeli Minister of Education Shulamit Aloni, the Israeli Chief Rabbi Shlomo Goren repeated the Talmudic teaching on resident aliens: that Judaism forbids "granting any national rights" to them. He ruled that such "Autonomy is tantamount to a denial of the Jewish religion." (Nadav Shraggai, Ha'aretz, Oct. 14, 1992).

Behold the man of Dan's Homeland Motherland Security World Police Force

Judaism has always been a conquering religion, not for the purpose of converting gentiles to become Jews, but rather with the mission of returning the world to the universal covenant between G-d and Noah. For halachic reasons too numerous and detailed to list here, gentiles today who follow Christianity, Islam, or other religions are not, for the most part, "righteous gentiles" who inherit the World to Come. That status belongs only to those gentiles who carefully observe the Seven Laws of Noah, including following the halachic authority of the oral Torah and the rabbis.

And as the Lubavitcher Rebbe has explained, by transforming the gentiles we can quickly create a vast army of supporters who will help us reveal Moshiach and bring all Jews back to the Torah. Specifically, the Rebbe has emphasized that the "peace process" in Israel will be defeated only through our influence on the gentiles--especially through the campaign to teach the Noachide Laws (see Sichos in English, vol. 16, [19 Kislev 5743]).

2 Thes 2:3-9

3: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

When the great falling away, lo I beheld Satan fall from heaven, when Satan is cast out, woe to the inhabitors of the world, for he, corruption is cast out from Gods incorruptile Kingdom. And that man of sin be revealed, Moshiach the son of Satan, Moshiach ben Dovid, their mere man god, who is no god, but shall be thrown into the pit.

"Our most pressing task, to put it simply, is to launch an international Noachide revolution without delay. The process has already begun, with dozens of tiny Noachide communities having appeared throughout the United States, generally composed of former Christians who have abandoned that religion. The task of organizing the revolution can be divided into two broad stages"

4: Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5: Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6: And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7: For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8: And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

"Simultaneously, we must organize functioning programs and institutions that are prepared to absorb these vast numbers of ex-Christians and immediately involve them in efforts to bring Moshiach. The Noachide communities require schools for their children, modeled after the Jewish yeshiva programs; Torah study groups geared for their specific needs; coordinated celebrations of appropriate Torah holidays; family services for marriage, support for the elderly, and burial; courts of justice, led by rabbinically trained righteous judges, which will function similarly to Jewish batei dinim; and tzedaka programs to assist the needy, to build new Noachide schools, and to support Jewish settlements in Israel and synagogues throughout the diaspora."

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. . Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts (the batei dini of the rabbis) will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha; in the United States,  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Talmudic law.

As the world plunges headlong toward the imminent revelation of Moshiach while the last walls of the exile disintegrate, the number of confused gentiles ready to change is rising exponentially. If the Jewish people immediately begin preparing adequate structures for the Noachide movement, this tide will be channeled directly into a glorious revelation of Truth. But if we allow ourselves to be caught unprepared, this same overwhelming force for social change can, G-d forbid, be diverted to empower Amalek's final assault on holiness. It is not a matter of whether gentile society will explode in the face of the growing crisis; this event is an inevitable, and fast-approaching, reality. We do not want to miss this incredible opportunity to provide light in the final moments of darkness.

The world has reached its ultimate point of decision, and the power to succeed belongs entirely to the Jewish people. We can wait until Moshiach comes on his own, following a world war, or we can bring him through our own actions, as the Lubavitcher Rebbe has stated is our mission. The choice is ours.


Moschiach ben Satan, their king, their god, the son of perdition.

KING OF THE JEWS of the Elders of Babylon Talmudism

9. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming.

George W. Bush announced at his innaguration that the Iron Triangle was complete

10. In the person of the king who with unbending will is master of himself and of humanity all will discern as it were fate with its mysterious ways. None will know what the king wishes to attain by his dispositions, and therefore none will dare to stand across an unknown path.

11. It is understood that the brain reservoir of the king must correspond in capacity to the plan of government it has to contain. It is for this reason that he will ascend the throne not otherwise than after examination of his mind by the aforesaid learned elders.

12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.

13. This terror was indispensable for us till the time comes for both these forces separately to fall under our influence.

14. The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts to the worst and most brutal side of human activity.

15. The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations.

16. Our supreme lord must be of an exemplary irreproachable.

The King Moshiach . . . stands atop the roof of the Holy Temple and announces to Israel, 'Humble ones, the time of your Redemption has arrived'--as has been announced and is being announced lately . . . This announcement is coming from the diaspora .

Every member of our generation has been appointed a shliach to disseminate the Noachide Laws, and prepare the world "to greet Moshiach Tzidkeinu." Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson referring to Moshiach ben Lucifer, their god under their Babylonian Talmud of the whore of Babylon.


The King, Moshiach ben Satan

O' Lucifer the son of the morning

Must have a prophet

The Brisker Rav directs us to the Rambam in Hilchos Sanhedrin 5:1 for additional information. A king can only be appointed by the Great Sanhedrin of seventy one men. The source for this is a Sifri in Parshas Shoftim. In truth, this halacha is found elsewhere in the Rambam himself, Hilchos Melachim 1:3. He states that in addition to the role played by the supreme court in the selection of a king, a prophet is required as well. For example, Yehoshua was designated by Moshe and his bais din. Kings Shaul and Dovid were both crowned by Shmuel Hanavi and his court. The bottom line is, though, that the Great Sanhedrin is needed to appoint a king. Back in the Rambam in Hilchos Sanhedrin 5:1, additional situations are mentioned which necessitate the involvement of the highest court. At the end of this halacha, the Rambam brings one of our psukim to support it. "They will bring every major case to you" (18:22). Remember, the term used here is "hadavar hagadol". Rav Yitzchok Ze'ev Soloveichik proves from here that this is the correct definition of "gadol" - the situations which are inherently major. They go straight to Moshe Rabainu, straight to the supreme court of the Jewish people.

Yes, Moshiach ben Satan, when crowned as the king of the Jews, Temporary and unblessed he be, he must have a prophet. This Prophet will be his prophet unto his father, Satan.

And will he come in his own name, 

Giovanni Batista Ra?

Saturnia-Rome and her god?

Will the whore and her daughter reunite?

Will Jerusalem and the High Priest of Nimrod be joined for the one world religion?

Judaism and Catholicism?

Yes they are still awaiting the prophet Elijah before their Moshiach, But they rejected the cornerstone and the Prophet who announced the Lord God, John the Baptist.

The Talmud relates that when R. Yehoshua b. Levi once asked Elijah the Prophet, "When will Moshiach come?" Elijah answered, "Go ask him. He is sitting among the sickly paupers at the entrance to Rome." R. Yehoshua then went to Moshiach and asked him, "When will you come?" Moshiach answered, "Today." R. Yehoshua later returned to Elijah and complained that Moshiach had lied: "He said he would come today, but he never came." Elijah explained that what Moshiach meant was " if you heed His voice" (Tehillim 95:7).

Now if Elijah will precede Moshiach, how could Moshiach have promised to come "today" - even if "today" means "today if you heed His voice" - since Elijah had not yet come?

Some posit that Elijah will precede Moshiach only if redemption occurs "in its time" (see Time of Redemption), not if is in the category of "I will hasten it" (ibid.). (Pleisi, "Beis Hasofek," ch. 110.)

Now we understand Moshiach's response to R. Yehoshua b. Levi, "today if you heed His voice": Moshiach refers to a redemption of "I will hasten it," which does not require Elijah's coming. We also understand how we can anticipate Moshiach's coming every day -- we anticipate a redemption of "I will hasten it.

And they have elaborately set up a missing seven years of prophecy to divert and deceive all those apostate of the Church of Jesus Christ to believe their would be seven years of peace and a "Secret Rapture" so that not any man would oppose the coming New World Order, the Olam Ha Ba, the false-Christ and his Prophet and the Great Sanhedrin. They shall attempt to establish their vision of their god, but they shall fail miserably, for Jesus Christ Our LOrd and Our God the King of the Jews shall come and in his brightness shall destroy the Moshaich and his false Prophet and all who receive them.

Home Site Index Sanhedrin Questions Temple Gallery
King Solomon's Temple



PATENT LICENSING - An opportunity to recreate the Sanhedrin?

The patent of this particular model of Solomon’s Temple will be exclusively licensed to the Great Sanhedrin without charge. This body of rabbinical elders should be established so that someday when the Islamic Authority of the Temple Mount transfers their power to another Authority they will be the body that exists to accept it.

This Great Senate of Councilors, the Great Sanhedrin was first established by Moses in the wilderness to help him administer the judgements of the Law of God. This body of elders were abolished by Roman Decree in 70 AD in the destruction of the Second Temple by Caesar Titus. This great body of Senators has not existed for nearly 2,000 years. What do the prophets say about the Sanhedrin? (Prophets of Baal) They say that before the next Temple can be built the Sanhedrin will already have been created. Someday a new Temple will be built. Will the Sanhedrin Council rule as a political body? No. The political body already exists. The Sanhedrin might serve strictly as a religious council over matters of worship only on the Temple Mount.

The eventual transfer of Authority of the Temple Mount will occur someday and the Sanhedrin needs to exist so that the power from the Islamic Authority which now Governs the Temple Mount can be transferred to an Israeli Authority, maybe this could be the body to accept the responsibility of the administration of the Temple Mount. Creation and election of the Sanhedrin.

The details of how the Sanhedrin will be chosen is not our concern. These small opinions only serve to open the debate. Maybe to initially create the Sanhedrin there could be; Twenty-five elected at large. Thirty-three elected according to religious affiliation so long as all Jewish bodies have at least two representatives on the council. The Prime Minister could appoint six. The majority of the Knesset could appoint six also. Total would be 71. The total number agrees with Numbers 11:16 & Mishnah San 1:6. Seventy elders plus Aaron equals 71. Vacancies that occur might be appointed from their disciples of the Sages as it occurred in times past.

In addition to the Sanhedrin Council Moses also created the very first Jury system in recorded human history. The people of the congregation of Israel served as Judges of the Law, in the Jury. Regarding final matters it was put to the people. So also maybe the people could choose who should represent them among the proven DNA tribe of Cohen. This religious council could serve as a blended body representing all Hebrew voices within Israel. Their main responsibility would be to administer the Laws of God on the Temple Mount and to oversee the rebuilding of the Temple. Regardless if it is rebuilt in our lifetime or not, it is our wish to transfer the licensing rights of this patent on Solomon’s Temple to the Sanhedrin within our lifetime.

According to the prophets there is a missing week of 7 years that will someday come to pass. Packaged within this week is suppose to be the rebuilding of the Temple according to Daniel. The decisions of the Sanhedrin can determine the exact nature of the worship, which fulfills the old Prophecies. According to the prophets that is; When shall the Temple be built? What type of Temple? Which model? How? Where exactly shall it be located? Where on the Temple Mount? Whether it is this model or not many of the questions posed on this website and other web sites are begging for answers. The unknown value of these patents will only be given to the Jewish people represented by the priestly Elders.

According to the Prophet of Baal there are seven missing years. According to God the Most High there were no missing years. You have been deceived by the fables of the Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Pharisaic Jews and their Leavened Bread.


Strong's Dictionary


neuter of a presumed derivative of a compound of sun - sun 4862 and the base of edraioV - hedraios 1476; a joint session, i.e. (specially), the Jewish Sanhedrin; by analogy, a subordinate tribunal:--council.

Like Sun = Ra their gods = Baal




And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.


And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.


And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,


 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.


And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.


And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:


And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.


Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.


and in Hebrew left to right, the mere man, the number of the Tzaddik, , the final Tzaddik


Behold he, who has the Mark of his name, Moshiach ben Dovid, whose mark is the mark of his name, the star of David, which never was the star of King David, but the sheild of Apostate Solomon who set up freemasonry and whom was the High Priest of the 33rd degree and of Moloch whom he made idols unto. Yes it will indeed be his mark, the star of Moloch which they have made with their hands, the mark of Satan, his star, they worship.


And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.


And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.


And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.


"Great Sanhedrin" 


World Court- International Court of Justice-

International Criminal Court


     If so, what cases fit into the category of "hadavar hakasheh" - difficult ones? Sometimes, a matter is relatively simple; the lower courts should be able to handle it. But things are not always as clear cut as they initially appear. What if a halachic dispute or uncertainty develops among the judges? Such cases must ALSO be brought to the Great Sanhedrin. True, they start out as routine litigation. But the complexities which arise afterward make it necessary to go to the top. This din is established in Parshas Shoftim. "If a matter will be concealed from you (too complicated to settle)...issues of disagreement in your gates, you must rise and go up to the place which Hashem your G-d will choose...." (Devarim 17:8). The pasuk is referring to disputes between halachic authorities of a city, regarding ritual purity, monetary matters, and other relatively simple questions. If such a situation will be unclear, the Torah requires us to take the issue to the Great Sanhedrin. This, says this Brisker Rav, is called "hadavar hakasheh" - a difficult matter. It is not "gadol" - major in its own right, but it did become complicated and confusing - "kasheh".

     In summary, Moshe was the caliber of a Sanhedrin of seventy one judges. Every major case and every difficult case would be brought to him, just as such matters would later be decided upon by the Great Sanhedrin. "Gadol" and "kasheh" are two separate dinim.

          "And I will restore your judges as at first..." (Yeshaya 1:26). May we be zocheh to see a world of justice and tranquility in our days.


World News

July 02, 2002

Congress unites in fear of world 'government'

AMERICA’S conservatives see the creation of the first global criminal court as another step towards a sinister “world government” that threatens US sovereignty.

They denounce the new tribunal as a “kangaroo court” set up by a deeply suspect United Nations. “The White House is bowing to conservatives who have a kneejerk reaction to any international body that has even the most remote authority to tell the United States what to do,The New York Times commented.

But the opposition in this case extends across the political spectrum. Congress has taken the extraordinary step of passing legislation that would authorise military action to free any American taken into custody. “Even Hillary Clinton voted for it,” one congressional aide said. “The idea that it’s some right-wing paranoid fear about the International Criminal Court (ICC) is not true.

No no fear at all, under condition of anonmity they embrace the Great Sanhedrin to enforce the Laws imposed by Congress, 102-14 the Babylonian Talmudic Laws of the not so great Sanhedrin World court of Goyim Noachides.

“In the US political context, the supporters of the ICC are a small minority — one fifth of the Senate. The other four fifths were ready to pile in. The court is seen as an assault on the United States and US sovereignty.”

As the world’s sole remaining superpower, the United States has the same suspicion as 19th-century Britain did of “foreign entanglements”. This longstanding isolationist tendency prevented the United States from joining the League of Nations and has left it deeply sceptical about the UN, which many conservatives see as an ungodly organisation once dominated by communists and now largely controlled by unreliable Europeans.

US negotiators tried and failed to give the UN Security Council control over which cases come before the court, which would have allowed Washington to use its UN veto to block the prosecution of Americans.

As a result, the US was not among the 120 states that endorsed the creation of the court at a 1998 conference in Rome. But President Clinton did eventually sign on as his last act in office so that the United States could remain engaged in negotiations.

Once it became clear that the court would come into existence without the changes sought by Washington, the Bush Administration told the UN it was “unsigning” the Rome Treaty.

William Pace, head of the non-governmental Coalition for the International Criminal Court, said: “What has happened is an international organisation is being established that the United States cannot control through the Security Council. This is the real ideological offence that is being taken. Even though it’s not going to be able to tell the US Government what to do, the fact that US citizens can be subject to international jurisdiction is unacceptable to the United States.”

Because the new tribunal has jurisdiction over crimes that take place on the territory of a state party, American nationals might be brought to justice even though the United States rejects the court.

Freedom of speech, deemed "Hate Crimes?

While the Pentagon worries that American soldiers might be prosecuted for purely political motives — that was the reason given for the vetoing the UN mission in Bosnia — there is an equally compelling fear driving US policy.

But of course they, Bushka is thinking of unsigning the Rome Treaty which establishes the Court, because on the very same day, July 1, 2002, the date which the Court would be full force....

Afghanistan: 'Some 40' civilians killed in bombing

U.S. says gunfire to blame for casualties

July 3, 2002 Posted: 1:13 AM EDT (0513 GMT)

July 3, 2002 Posted: 1:13 AM EDT (0513 GMT)

July 3, 2002 Posted: 1:13 AM EDT (0513 GMT)

Col. James Wu comforts Palako, 6, while assessing the medical needs of the Mir Wais Hospital in Kandahar, Afghanistan, Tuesday.  

KABUL, Afghanistan (CNN) -- About 40 people, all civilians, were killed Monday in an attack by U.S. forces on a central Afghan village, Afghan Foreign Minister Dr. Abdullah said Tuesday. "Some 100" other people were wounded, he said.

July 1, 2002

Abdullah said the dead included 25 family members who were celebrating a wedding in a village in Uruzgan Province.

Casualty figures remain unclear. Wedding party members told reporters about 120 to 130 of the 300 attending the celebration may have been killed, while U.S. defense officials said at least 20 people died in the attack and more than 60 were wounded in the incident.


Sham fight of empty eloquence the same day that two Amerikan Kamikazi pilots disregarded orders and bombed innocent women and children attending a wedding, or did they actually disregard any orders.

Or could it be...possibly, that Mr. Shrub Bush knows that Amerika will indeed be forced to completely agree with the Rome Treaty? A show of empty opposition, a ruse, diversion tricks of Propaganda?

Bush: U.S. personnel will never face global court

July 3, 2002 Posted: 5:39 AM EDT (0939 GMT)

July 3, 2002 Posted: 5:39 AM EDT (0939 GMT)

July 3, 2002 Posted: 5:39 AM EDT (0939 GMT)From Kelly Wallace
CNN Washington Bureau

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin (CNN) -- President Bush, facing criticism from European allies, remained defiant about the United States' refusal to back the new international war crimes court, pledging Tuesday he will never allow American diplomats and soldiers to be dragged before it.

"The International Criminal Court is troubling to the United States," Bush told reporters following a tour at a Milwaukee church. "As the United States works to bring peace around the world, our diplomats and our soldiers could be drug into this court, and that's very troubling -- very troubling to me."

Setting the stage for a major confrontation with European allies, the United States on Sunday vetoed a six-month extension of the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Bosnia. The administration argues that in order for U.S. troops to take part in this and other U.N. peacekeeping missions, American troops must be granted immunity from prosecutions by the new international court.

When the global force of troops are all granted immunity, what then? A total disregard for innocent civilians by the foreign troops placed on Amerikan soil? Will all the countries as Bushka states be granted immunity? What then is the reason for the court? Propaganda....Bushka rallying the people behind him by using a false "Patriotism" argument which he nor his Father nor his grandfather who financially supported Hitler also used.

Bush said Tuesday that his administration would "try to work out the impasse at the United Nations," but he said his team would never sign on to the International Criminal Court.

Too late bud, Clinton the Rhodes scholar and 33rd degreed Freemason of Babylon education has already signed away America.

Ari Fleischer, (talmudic Jew)  the president's spokesman, told reporters traveling aboard Air Force One that the United States wants the same protections for its troops that the other nations that have signed the treaty currently enjoy.

"The president wants a level playing field, because those other nations that are signatories to the ICC and are participating under its purview have negotiated similar immunities for their personnel," Fleischer said.

U.S. allies argue the Bush administration, by rejecting the treaty, is pursuing a unilateralist approach and placing the stability of the Balkans at risk.

So, with this false opposition, knowing full well that the US will be a full ratifying member of this global court, Sanhedrin, what attack will happen and where will it happen on Independence day?

Then the US and the rest will rush into the protection of the not so Great revived Sanhedrin.

This is no prediction, just a simple analysis of the facts of propaganda and understanding Satan's plan, because Jesus clearly warned us before.


The American puppet politicians are not stupid, for they understand the "Protocols" The plan of Satan and his elders. They know the  Talmudic sons of Satan are in full control. They know that the Soviets, the Jews of the Russian Revolution have won. The leaders have hidden this information out of cowardice and the rewards of the spoils which will be shared with them. They have treasonously betrayed America. They must act immediately, before the true patriots of America, the true America awaken, for then they know even their lives will be in jeopardy. But not by the hands of the saints, but of their very own seed.


Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!

One week Later

U.S. Backs Down From Immunity Demand
Wed Jul 10,10:38 PM ET

By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The United States on Wednesday backed off from its demand for permanent immunity for U.S. peacekeepers from the new war crimes tribunal, proposing instead a ban on any investigation of its peacekeepers for a year.


In the face of intense criticism from countries around the world, including close allies, U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte circulated the new proposal to the U.N. Security Council after an open council meeting.

The United States earlier had threatened to end U.N. peacekeeping if it didn't get open-ended immunity for peacekeepers from countries that have not ratified the Rome treaty establishing the court, which came into existence on July 1. The treaty has been signed by 139 countries and ratified by 76, including all 15 members of the European Union 

The United States has been demanding immunity on grounds that other countries could use the new court for frivolous and politically motivated prosecutions of American soldiers. The position has put the Bush administration at odds with its closest allies and the rest of the world.

The new draft U.S. resolution asks the court for a 12-month exemption from investigation or prosecution of peacekeepers and "expresses the intention to renew the request ... for further 12 month periods for as long as may be necessary."

Many Security Council members said the new U.S.-proposed resolution didn't go far enough. Nonetheless, they called the mood positive and said for the first time the United States appeared willing to negotiate.

Britain's U.N. Ambassador Jeremy Greenstock, the current council president, called the U.S. proposal "a fair basis for discussion" and said consultations would continue on Thursday.

At the open council meeting, ambassadors from nearly 40 countries criticized the U.S. demand for immunity, saying it would affect peacekeeping and stability from the Balkans to Africa. Only India offered some sympathy to the U.S. position.

Canada's U.N. Ambassador Paul Heinbecker, who requested the open meeting, warned that the United States was putting the credibility of the Security Council, the legality of international treaties, and the principle that all people are equal and accountable before the law at stake.

Washington last month vetoed a six-month extension of the 1,500-strong U.N. police training mission in Bosnia and a yearlong extension of the authorization for the 18,000-strong NATO -led peacekeeping force — and then gave the missions two reprieves, the latest until July 15.

Its argument of the fear of politically motivated prosecutions was rejected by speakers from the European Union, Latin America, Africa and Asia who countered that the Rome treaty had sufficient safeguards to prevent. First and foremost, the court will step in only when states are unwilling or unable to dispense justice for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

The draft U.S. resolution makes no mention of immunity.

Under the U.S. proposal, any peacekeeper who was exempt from investigation or prosecution for a year could then be investigated and prosecuted if the exemption was not renewed — though no U.N. peacekeeper has ever been charged with a war crime.

"We have for one year a total freedom," said Richard Grenell, spokesman for the U.S. Mission, who said this was sufficient time to bring any American suspect home, thus out of reach of the court.

"What we have been focused on is ensuring that American men and women are not within the reach of the International Criminal Court," he said. "What we have been able to offer today ... (is) that for a period of 12 months they would have that immunity."

But the U.S. draft still raises serious questions for some council members.

The Rome treaty allows the Security Council to request a 12-month deferral of investigation or prosecution by the court on a case-by-case basis.

Diplomats said some council members argued that the U.S. draft would change the statute's intent by giving blanket deferral to peacekeepers.

"It's a very positive attitude on the part of the U.S. to bring a new text which is a step in the right direction," said Mauritius' U.N. Ambassador Jagdish Koonjul, a council member. "I think we are getting closer."

Colombia's U.N. Ambassador Alfonso Valdivieso, also a council member, called the U.S. draft "an improvement" because it was not "in perpetuity."

But both said the blanket deferral for peacekeepers was still an issue.

Yes the Great Sanhedrin, the establishment of the Talmudic court is secure....


5. FOR A TIME PERHAPS WE MIGHT BE SUCCESSFULLY DEALT WITH BY A COALITION OF THE "GOYIM" OF ALL THE WORLD: but from this danger we are secured by the discord existing among them whose roots are so deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up. We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the GOYIM, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries. This is the reason why there is not one State which would anywhere receive support if it were to raise its arm, for every one of them must bear in mind that any agreement against us would be unprofitable to itself. We are too strong - there is no evading our power. THE NATIONS CANNOT COME TO EVEN AN INCONSIDERABLE PRIVATE AGREEMENT WITHOUT OUR SECRETLY HAVING A HAND IN IT.

11. The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in the following: To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. THERE IS NOTHING MORE DANGEROUS THAN PERSONAL INITIATIVE: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the GOYIM communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence. The strain which results from freedom of actions saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments, failures. BY ALL THESE MEANS WE SHALL SO WEAR DOWN THE "GOYIM" THAT THEY WILL BE COMPELLED TO OFFER US INTERNATIONAL POWER OF A NATURE THAT BY ITS POSITION WILL ENABLE US WITHOUT ANY VIOLENCE GRADUALLY TO ABSORB ALL THE STATE FORCES OF THE WORLD AND TO FORM A SUPER-GOVERNMENT (One World Order). In place of the rulers of to-day we shall set up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government Administration.(United Nations) Its hands will reach out in all directions like nippers and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.

 1. The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces - are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.

3. We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.




1. When we at last definitely come into our kingdom by the aid of COUPS D'ETAT prepared everywhere for one and the same day, after definitely acknowledged (and not a little time will pass before that comes about, perhaps even a whole century) we shall make it our task to see that against us such things as plots shall no longer exist. With this purpose we shall slay without mercy all who take arms (in hand) to oppose our coming into our kingdom. Every kind of new institution of anything like a secret society (church of Jesus Christ) will also be punished with death; those of them which are now in existence, are known to us, serve us and have served us, we shall disband and send into exile to continents far removed from Europe.

2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF "GOYIM," and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall act clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.

13. You may say that the GOYIM will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a manoeuvre of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail - the undergrounds, metropolitans, those subterranean corridors which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organizations and archives.


""Communism was designed to subvert the masses" while "Zionism set out to subvert rulers at the top." These twin aims have been largely achieved."   - D. Reed.

"Zionism is 'the worship of a false god'- an 'idolatrous religion.'   - British Historian A. Toynbee"

"The practice of dominant Russia, inside the Soviet Union led to tragic consequences for non-Russian people. Some of them which once, i.e., prior to their enslavement by Tsarist generals, not only constituted one whole as a people but were also independent as states, have today been completely eradicated from the face of the earth and in most inhuman way which could be envied by Hitler himself."
                                      - Tito at the 8th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia, 1952.

"We have the right to demand anything we like from the world. As Jews we do not owe anything to anybody, while the rest of the world owes us a great deal."
                          - Ariel Sharon at a speech to foreign Jewish delegates at a meeting at Gush Etzion.

Arik Sheinerman of Russian/Bolshevik Parents

"The Sanhedrin acknowledged the extinction of the Jewish nation to be an accomplished fact!"
                            - Great Sanhedrin convened in February 1807, called by Napoleon Bonaparte.

"Democracy has degraded statesmen into politicians."    - British Prime Minister Disraeli in Lothair (1870).


Courtesy: Excerpted from The Next World Order by Ahmad Thomson, Copyright © 1994.

Douglas Reed in The Controversy of Zion concludes:


... this only became clear when the [Russian/Bolshevik] revolution of 1917 produced an almost all-Jewish government in Russia; and by that time power [of Ashkenazim] over governments in the West was so great that the nature of this new regime was little discussed, a virtual law of heresy having come into force there.


... This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition).

These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People's Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others.

The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918 - 1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly "Socialist" or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of "opposition" was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton.


It is also clear that this majority continued to be sustained long after the 'Jewish' revolution had toppled Russia's former 'Christian' rulers:


In 1933 the American Jewish journal 'Opinion' stated that Jews occupied almost all important ambassadorial posts and that in White Russia 61 percent of all officials were Jews; it also stated that the Jewish percentage of the population (then given as 158,400,000) was "less than 2 percent". If this was true it meant that Russia at that time contained less than 3,000,000 Jews. In 1933 the 'Jewish Chronicle' stated that one-third of the Jews in Russia had become officials. If this was the case, they plainly formed the new governing class.


Mr. Wilton indicated: "Taken according to numbers of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevist Russia they are nine in ten; if anything the proportion of Jews is still greater." This was plain reporting, and if the report had related to "Ukranians", for instance, instead of "Jews", none would have objected; the mere act of reporting a fact became the ground for secret denunciation because the fact related to Jews.


...That was after the two conspiracies [Balfour Declaration on Palestine for the Jews and Bolshevik revolution], having grown in secrecy side by side, triumphed in the same week of 1917 ... Such was the state of the two-headed conspiracy in Russia when Dr. Weizmann grew to manhood and began to play his part. The word "conspiracy", frequently used here, is not the author's; Dr. Weizmann candidly employs it."

In all this, the majority of Sephardhic Jews - with the notable exception of the wealthy Sephardhic bankers and industrialists played a minor role, or rather they were assigned a minor role, for the reasons that have already been stated. Just as the Israelites "ceased to exist" as far as the Levitical Judahite elite were concerned once they had become the official guardians of the Levitcal Law, so the Sephardhim have been largely ignored ever since Ashkenazi elite assumed control of Talmudic Judaism, and, Douglas Reed points out, their numbers have suddenly and inexplicably dwindled:


The secretive life of Jewry has made the counting of Jewish heads impossible at all periods. This lack of any trustworthy figures of Jewish populations enabled the ruling sect a century ago to begin, and in our day almost to complete, an astonishing biological operation: they have transformed nearly all Jews into Ashkenazim!


At the end of the 18th century the Jews known to the West were the Sephardhim, who inherited at least a tenuous tradition, a frail thread leading back through Spain to Africa, and fading then into a legend of Canaanitish origins. By the middle of the present century these Jews were declared by the elders of Jewry to have become almost extinct! A report presented to the Second World Sephardhic Conference held in New York in 1954 stated that the Jewish world population was 11,763,491; that only 1,744,883 (or 15 per cent) of these Jews were Sephardhim; and that merely 52000 of these Sephardhim lived in Europe (which formerly knew only Sephardhic Jews) and the entire Western Hemisphere.


At that point they threw the "Eastern Jews" into the contest, whose emergence as a separate body of Jews coincided with the start of the world-revolution. Before then the West knew only "Jews", and these were the Sephardhic Jews. Alluding to the period when Disraeli began to speak of Jewish leadership of the revolution, Dr. Kastein says, "From this time onwards it is possible to speak of Western and Eastern Jews." In fact the separate breeds had existed for about a thousand years; what Dr. Kastein means is that the Eastern Jews at that moment emerged as a distinct body, mobilized by the rabbinical government for action against the emancipated Sephardhic Jews of the West and against the West itself.

Up to that time the Western Jews had only been dimly aware of these Eastern Jews, and to the Christian West they were unknown. Their cohesion as a mass, and the energy which had been stored up in them by many centuries of rabbinical absolutism in the ghettoes, was to make them, when they entered the West, the most powerful of all the forces which shaped the events of the 20th Century. They were good material for the purpose; to which they were put. Racially of barbaric Asiatic origins, for centuries they had received a Talmudic training in a regimentation as strict as that of any ancient Oriental despotism.

Given the control of modern media of mass-propaganda and mass-suggestion it is possible to impress on the mind of the multitude these false images of what is happening elsewhere, and under the spell of such false notions to incite them into war itself. During the last century the politicians of the West began habitually to declaim against the persecution of the Jews in Russia, while these Jews, under a rigorous leadership, were being prompted to destroy emancipation by every conceivable means.

The Gentile politicians of the West presented these fictions to their peoples as truth, for they had found that powerful Jews, in all countries, were able to assist parties favoured by them with money, press support and votes; the return they required was support for the cause of the "persecuted" Jews in Russia and for the "return" to Palestine. In effect this meant that politicians who sought these favours had to subordinate national interest to two causes ultimately destructive of all nation-states: the revolution and the ambition to acquire territory for the dominant race. This was the process by means of which, as Disraeli said in Lothair (1870), "democracy has degraded statesmen into politicians". In this way also that state of the mass-mind began to take shape which would not brook any confutation, no matter how fully proven, of the legend of a permanent Jewish persecution and of a disease endemic in Gentile man (an epidemic at that time in Russia called "antisemitism"). When it was dangerous to believe that the world was round, the multitude vocally agreed that it was flat; this condition was reproduced, in respect of Talmudic Judaism's propaganda in the 19th century, with the results which have been seen in this one.


Douglas Reed concludes:

In the event this only became clear when the revolution of 1917 produced an almost all-Jewish government in Russia; and by that time power over governments in the West was so great that the nature of this new regime was little discussed, a virtual law of heresy having come into force there.

In time, and as their numbers increased, the Ashkenazi Jews of America became so influential that in presidential elections, it was the candidate who secured the Jewish vote who secured the presidency.

Dr. Chaim Weizmann's book is the best single fount of information about the twin roots of Communism and Zionism and their convergent purpose. He was present at the birth of Zionism, he became its roving plenipotentiary, he was for forty years the darling of Western courts, presidential offices and cabinet rooms, he became the first president of the Zionist state, and he told the entire tale with astonishing candour. He shows how, in those remote Talmudic communities nearly a hundred years ago, the strategy took shape which in its consequences was to catch up, as in a vortex, all peoples of the West. Americans and Britons, Germans and Frenchmen, Italians, Poles, Scandinavians, Baits, the Balkanic peoples and all others were to be implicated. The life-blood and treasure of the West were to be spent on the promotion of these two complementary purposes like water from a running tap.


The remaining mass of Jews in Russia, (that is, those that lived in the ghettoes under Talmudic rule) were divided into two groups by a vertical line which split households and families, including Dr. Weizmann's own house and family. Both groups were revolutionary; that is to say, they agreed in working for the destruction of Russia. The dissension was solely on the point of Zionism. The Communist-revolutionary group held that full emancipation would be achieved when the world-revolution supplanted the nation-states everywhere. The Zionist-revolutionary group, while agreeing that world-revolution was indispensable to the process, held that full "emancipation" would only be achieved when a Jewish nation was established in a Jewish state.

The ruling sect, looking into the future above the heads of the regimented mass, evidently saw that both groups were essential to the end in view ... From the middle of the last century the story of the revolution is that of Communism and Zionism, directed from one source and working to a convergent aim.

Dr. Weizmann gives an illuminating glimpse of this apparent dissension among the members of a conspiratorial, but divided, Jewish household where the ultimate shape of the high strategy was not seen and the issue between "revolutionary-Communism" and "revolutionary-Zionism" was fiercely argued. He quotes his mother, the Jewish matriarch, as saying contentedly that if the Communist-revolutionary son were proved right she would be happy in Russia, and if the Zionist-revolutionary one were correct, then she would be happy in Palestine. In the outcome both were by their lights proved right; after spending some years in Bolshevized Moscow she went to end her days in Zionised Palestine. That was after the two conspiracies, having grown in secrecy side by side, triumphed in the same week of 1917 ...

Balfour's Zion and the Revolution which was of the Babylonian Talmudic Jews against Christianity. The same is now happening in America. If you refuse, Off with your head. If you hold firm for with your head. Once again they will offer the star of shame of ownership of Moloch, Baal....Satan. Will you accept the Mark?

Furthermore, since many of the Jews were by Christian standards extremely well-educated and very able administrators, it was inevitable that the Christians Soon began to rely on the Jews to teach them what they did not know and to administer their society on their behalf, just as the Jews had been doing for the Muslims....

The Moors [Muslims] remained in Spain for nearly eight hundred years. When the Spanish reconquest, after this long ordeal, was completed in 1492 the Jews, as well as the Moors, were expelled. They had become identified with the invaders' rule and were cast out when it ended, as they had followed it in.

The "centre" of Talmudic government was then transferred to Poland.

The Whore of Babylon, Satans bride, embraces her daughter which she sent out into the world to eventually discredit and scatter the power of the saints. Yes the daughter of that un-holy union, the daughter of the Babylonian High Priest Pontifex Maximus of the order of Nimrod the first man-god whom they worshipped. Make no mistake, the two are one and will soon re-unite as the world religion of which all world religions were spawned. And now, the only obstacle...Those of Jesus Christ, the ONLY GOD and only one God, the great IAM.

April 21, 1994

Leslie Susser

The embrace of Moshiach ben Satan and his prophet

Thirty years ago, when he visited the Holy Land, Pope Paul VI refused to accept any vestige of Israeli statehood. Now Israel and the Vatican are about to establish full diplomatic relations. The transformation is due to one man: Pope John Paul II At the height of his diplomatic troubles after the Hebron massacre, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin turned to the pope. The leader of the Jewish state seeking a boost from the Holy See was unprecedented tacit recognition of the pope's universal moral standing. It also demonstrated the immense leap forward in relations between Israel and the Vatican in recent months. The Pope

Rabin met Pope John Paul II in mid-March in Rome, and asked him to use his moral authority to help get Middle East peace talks back on track after the massacre.(Arik Sheinerman's massacre) A warm communiqu published by the Holy See indicated that the pope was ready to do whatever he could. A papal emissary was despatched to PLO headquarters in Tunis. And in private, the pope told Rabin that he hoped comprehensive peace would be achieved in the Middle East by the year 2000, as Christianity approached the end of its second millennium.

For Israel and the Jews, John Paul II has been a special pope. The first in modern times to have taken a fiercely uncompromising public stand against anti-Semitism, he has been obsessed with improving relations between the Church and the Jews, and between the Vatican and Israel. The Holocaust, he once told a visiting rabbi, was "the great tragedy of our times. We must do all in our power never to let it happen again." And in his groundbreaking 1986 visit to Rome's old synagogue, John Paul referred to Judaism as Christianity's "beloved elder brother."

It was the combination of the pope's personal sympathies and changing geopolitical circumstances especially progress in the Middle East peace process that led to the historic Fundamental Agreement between the Holy See and the State of Israel, signed in Jerusalem last December. Full diplomatic relations, stated a secret appendix, would be established as soon as subcommittees were set up to deal with outstanding problems. With a high-level Vatican delegation due in Jerusalem on April 12 to set up the subcommittees, full Israeli-Vatican ties are now imminent.

Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin, who led the Israeli team in the arduous 18-month-long negotiations with the Vatican, expects the talks on fleshing out the Fundamental Agreement to last at least two years. "Each of the 15 articles has to be worked out now in great detail. And in our talks so far, Vatican negotiators have been very tough, placing great emphasis on subtle nuances we did not think were very important."

For the Vatican, the key to the negotiation has been safeguarding the Church's traditional rights in the Holy Land regarding holy places, Christian pilgrimages, Catholic education, charitable institutions, health care and, most of all, Church property. The Vatican wants to be sure that it is not left out as peace transforms the Holy Land. But translating rights granted the Church by custom into binding legal obligations isn't easy.

For example, how should the state write into law the Church's traditional exemption from taxation and bookkeeping? New laws passed by the Knesset now require all non-profit organizations, including religious institutions, to keep books. And what about profit-making Church properties, like hospices and hotels? "These," Beilin says, "are full-fledged businesses and getting agreement on this will not be easy."

Rabbi David Rosen, director of interfaith relations at the Jerusalem office of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL), and a member of the Israeli negotiating team, says what made the talks over the Fundamental Agreement so intriguing and complex was the meeting round the table of "two textually obsessed traditions." Moreover, Israel and the church came to their negotiations with two completely different views of their respective statuses.

For the Vatican, the negotiations were between two equal entities not just two independent states, but also the leading representatives of "Christianity" and Judaism, with equal religious rights in the Holy Land. Israel, by contrast, insisted that it alone is the secular power in the Holy Land, and that any agreements would have to be "subordinate" to Israeli law. The eventual compromise was that the Fundamental Agreement stood "in harmony with Israeli law." "That took months," says Beilin. "Now we will have to try to define exactly what it means." There may never have been an agreement if Beilin and aide Shlomo Gur had not found a secret channel to the Vatican. In December 1992, six months after the start of the public negotiations by the "permanent bilateral commission," a friend of Gur's put the two Israelis in touch with Father David Jaeger.

The cherubic, 39-year-old Jaeger, now judge president of the Catholic Court in Austin, Texas, is a former Israeli, who, after a strictly Orthodox Jewish upbringing, converted to Catholicism. With his knowledge of Hebrew, Israel and Judaism, he quickly became the Church's main go-between with the Israelis.

Jaeger, Beilin and Gur met at dozens of secret rendezvous in Europe and the United States, and whatever they agreed upon was incorporated into the public negotiations, without the other negotiators ever knowing how agreement on thorny issues in dispute had suddenly been reached. The final draft of the Fundamental Agreement was hammered out at a secret meeting at the Vatican U.N. representative's home in New York in November, approved by the bilateral commission on December 10, and then signed and sealed in Jerusalem on December 30.

The diplomatic agreement between Israel and the Vatican as states set the stage for a public demonstration of Jewish-Christian (Catholic-Babylonian) reconciliation, organized by Rosen. In February, the rabbi convened an international Jewish-Christian conference in Jerusalem, bringing together over 400 Jewish and Christian religious leaders from more than 80 countries. Among them were Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of the Vatican, Italy's Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini (who many predict will be the next pope), and George Carey, the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Not  me I say Giovanni Batista Re will be next, in his own name they will accept him.

France's Chief Rabbi Rene Samuel Sirat, overcome by the historic magnitude of the occasion, told Rosen: "What you have done is very important. You don't know just how important."

Not everyone agreed. The Orthodox religious establishment in Israel stayed away, mainly because of behind-the-scenes pressure from the fiercely anti-Labor government Rabbi Eliezer Schach, who dismissed the conference as "another socialist broadside against the Jewish religion." On the Christian side, Dominican monk Marcel Dubois, a Hebrew University philosophy professor who served as a consultant to the bilateral commission, and who, perhaps better than anyone else, articulates the deeper meanings of Jewish-Christian coexistence, repudiated the conference as too much, too soon, and boycotted it. "It was like a Barnum and Bailey circus," he says, far removed from the essentially private nature of religious experience. And he adds: "When we meet, Jews and Christians, even in the most beautiful communion, there is still an open wound that separates us." Indeed, the historical legacy that divides Christians and Jews is perhaps too wide to be reconciled, despite any diplomatic arrangements. Many Jews see the Church as largely responsible for laying the anti-Semitic foundations for the Holocaust. And not so long ago the Church was still engaged in "the teaching of contempt" for the Jews.

Pope Paul VI's 1964 visit to the Holy Land was insulting to Israel, as the pontiff, unwilling to recognize any vestige of Israeli statehood, agreed only to travel from Jordan to Megiddo and back along a specially prepared road, and addressed a thank you note to "Mr." Zalman Shazar in Tel Aviv, although Shazar's official title was "president" and his residence (and office) was in Jerusalem.

The sea change in relations occurred a year later, in 1965, with the famous Nostra Aetate declaration at the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, which absolved the Jews as a people of deicide for the murder of Jesus. Still it took almost 30 years to get from the statement of doctrine to diplomatic relations.

One reason is that at the same time Nostra Aetate put the Jews in the clear, it also heralded a decentralization of power in the Church. As a consequence, until very recently, opponents of ties with Israel in Rome and especially local Palestinian Christians were able to dictate a cool and distant relationship between the Church and Israel. When the breakthrough Fundamental Agreement was eventually signed, Palestinian Christians protested that it granted Israel a gratuitous prize. The Church, they said, should have waited until the Israeli-PLO peace deal was implemented.

It was only in 1987 that the pope declared that there was no theological obstacle to relations between the Holy See and Israel. Dubois speaks of the crucial importance of Christian recognition of the linear nature of the Judeo-Christian tradition, of Israel as Christianity's closely related forebear. "What we have is a family quarrel. And if before the emphasis was on the word `quarrel,' now the emphasis is on the word `family.'"

But still Dubois concedes there are theological problems that can never be resolved until "the end of days." For example, the Catholic view of history that portrays Judaism as a prologue to Christianity and that regards the Holocaust as part of the working of God's mysterious ways toward redemption. According to this tradition, the "Jews turning away from God" enabled Christianity to be "grafted onto the Pauline olive tree," replacing the Jews as God's chosen people. Only at the end of days, will the Jews be regrafted onto that tree. "On some of our differences," Dubois says, "the only possible response is silence."

Theology aside, the Fundamental Agreement was a triumph for both sides. As Beilin put it at the time it was a "victory for reason, and a victory for the Zionist movement." In its return to the land, Zionism has always craved recognition and legitimacy. In this, the authority and weight of the Church are of no small significance. "After the agreement, we received cables of congratulation from Catholic countries from all over the world," says Beilin.

But, perhaps, even more important is the Church's joining forces with Israel in the fight against anti-Semitism. Article 2 of the Fundamental Agreement states that "the Holy See and the State of Israel are committed to appropriate cooperation in combating all forms of anti-Semitism..." Says Beilin: "It is one thing if we condemn an anti-Semitic incident in, say, Argentina. But it's quite another if the pope does."

The Pope is of Poland and a devout Socialist. A Jewish Pope, for Jewry is no nationality but a religion of Baal of Babylon.

At that point, less than four centuries before our own generation, a significant mystery enters the story of Zion: why was the government set up in Poland? Up to that stage the annals reveal no trace of any large migration of Jews to Poland. The Jews who entered Spain with the Moors came from North Africa and when they left most of them returned thither or went to Egypt, Palestine, Italy, the Greek islands and Turkey. Other colonies had appeared in France, Germany, Holland and England and these were enlarged by the arrival among them of Jews from the Spanish Peninsula. There is no record that any substantial number of Spanish Jews went to Poland, or that any Jewish mass-migration to Poland had occurred at any earlier time.

Your significant mystery has been answered. It is called Mystery Iniquity.

Yet in the 1500's, when the "centre" was set up in Poland, "a Jewish population of millions came into being there", according to Dr. Kastein. But populations of millions do not suddenly "come into being". Dr. Kastein shows himself to be aware that something needs explanation here, and to be reluctant to go into it, for he dismisses the strange thing with the casual remark that the size of this community, of which nothing has previously been heard, "was more due to immigration, apparently from France, Germany and Bohemia, than to any other cause." He does not explain what other cause he might have in mind and, for a diligent scholar, is on this one occasion strangely content with a random surmise.

Esth:8:17: And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.

And when the Guillotines began to fall many in America will become Obedient Noachides, for fear of the Jews of Babylon Talmud

So it is in this case; behind Dr. Kastein's artless conjecture the most important fact in the later story of Zion is concealed. The "centre" of Jewish government was at this time planted among a large community of people who were unknown to the world as Jews and in fact were not Jews in any literal sense. They had no Judahite blood at all (for that matter, Judahite blood must by this time have been almost extinct even among the Jews of Western Europe) and their forefathers had never known Judea, or any soil but that of Tartary.

These people were the Khazars ...

From the moment when "the centre" was transferred to Poland these Asiatics began to move towards, and later to enter the West in the guise of "Jews" and they brought Europe to its greatest crisis. Though their conversion had occurred so long before they were so remote that the world might never have known of them, had not the Talmudic centre been set up among them, so that they came to group themselves around it.

When they became known, as "Eastem Jews", they profited by the confusing effect of the contraction of the word Judahite, or Judean, to "Jew"; none would ever have believed that they were Judahites or Judeans. From the time when they took over the leadership of Jewry the dogma of "the return" to Palestine was preached in the name of people who had no Semitic blood or ancestral link with Palestine whatever!

Revelation 2:9

9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:8-10

8: I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.
9: Behold, I will make them of the
synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
10: Because thou hast kept the
word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.

Will you be dwelling upon the earth, or will you be beheaded for not denying the Name above ALL Names, Jesus Christ the Lord God Almighty?

Thus it is clear that the Ashkenazim were not descended from any of the Hebrews, or from any of the twelve tribes of the Tribe of Israel, and especially not from the tribes of Judah or Levi.

Similarly, as we have already seen, as a result of proselytism, inter-marriage and inter-breeding - partly due in earlier times, to the results of the Middle Eastern practice of having female slaves and concubines from other races and tribes - many of the Sephardhim were no longer of pure Judahite descent:


Even at the start of the 800 years in Spain (from 711 to 1492) the Jews there (the largest single community of Jews) were no longer Judahite or Judeans; not even they could claim to be of the pure line of Judah, or of Palestinian ancestry. Professor Graetz says of them, "The first settlement of Jews in beautiful Hesperia is buried in dim obscurity", and adds that the Jews there "desired to lay claim to high antiquity" for their ancestry, so that they simply asserted that "they had been transported thither after the destruction of the temple by Nebuchadnezzar."

Through many centuries the processes of nature and of man had enforced a mingling. The idea of a people chosen to rule the world over the bodies of fallen heathen appealed to primitive tribes people in many places; the already-circumcized Arab could become a Jew and hardly notice any change; Rabbis in north African deserts and towns were remote from the "centre" and gladly extended their congregations. When the Roman emperors began to persecute "pagan religions" Judaism never fell under a general prohibition, so that many worshippers of Isis, Baal and Adonis, if they did not become Christians, entered the synagogues. The fierce law of tribal segregation could not at that time be enforced in places far from Babylon.

The Jewish Encyclopaedia is explicit: "The Sephardhim are descendants of the Jews who were expelled from Spain and Portugal and who settled in Southern France, Italy, North Africa, Asia Minor, Holland, England, North and South America, Germany, Denmark, Austria and Hungary." Poland is not mentioned; the Talmudic Government went there, but the mass of these Sephardhic Jews distributed themselves in Western Europe; they moved westward, not eastward. The "government" was suddenly separated from the people and the mass began to dissolve.

Thus the Ashkenazi Jews rejoined the Polish Babylonian Pontifex Maximas, from whence came the socialistic Pope John Paul 2

Once again, a virtually independent state was formed within the Polish state, which like so many states before and after showed the greatest benevolence to the nation-within-nations that took shape within its gates. As in the earlier and later cases this in no wise mitigated the hostility of the Talmudic Jews towards it, which was proverbial.

Dr. Kastein gives the picture of this independent Jewish government during the Polish phase. The Talmudists were allowed to draw up "a constitution", and through the 1500's and 1600's the Jews in Poland lived under "an autonomous government". This administered "an iron system of autonomy and an iron religious discipline, which inevitably resulted in the formation of an oligarchic body of administrators and the development of an extreme form of mysticism" (this gives the picture of the training under rigid discipline in close confinement, which produced the Communist and Zionist revolutionaries of our century).

The ghetto was not something inflicted on the Jews by the Gentiles. It was the logical product of the Talmudic Law, and derived directly from the experiment in Babylon. Dr. Kastein describes the Talmud as "the home" which the Jews took everywhere with them. However, for physical life they also needed four walls and a roof. The Talmud itself decreed that the Gentiles were not "neighbours" and that a Jew might not sell landed property adjoining that of a Jew to a Gentile. The express object of such provisions as these was the segregation of Jews from others and their isolation in ghettoes.

And for one moment do not follow the blind pastors who have left the flock of Jesus Christ and believe them when they refute the whoredoms of Jerusalem and the rising of the suns Great Sanhedrin of Satan



Paris, March 2, 1997

The honorable Chief Rabbi of France
Honorable Chief Rabbis and Rabbis
Honorable President of the Central Religious Council
Distinguished Guests,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

At the City Hall of Paris, in the presence of the mayor, my friend Jean Tibéri, you just celebrated the 190th anniversary of the Great Sanhedrin, which saw the Jewish religion take its place among the religions recognized by the State.

In welcoming you here at the Elysée Palace, I wanted to bear witness to the entire Republic's participation in this anniversary.

Our encounter this evening is marked by gratitude, our nation's gratitude for all the contributions--past and present--made by the Jewish community of France. It is marked by friendship, for indeed everybody is aware of the longstanding personal ties that bind me to your community. It is also marked by dialogue and exchange at a time when France, facing the difficulties that arise in periods of transition, is reflecting on its own identity. The history of your community, its successful commitment to serve France and the Republic while remaining true to its values and its faith, is an example that we should ponder together.

On February 9, 1806, the representatives of the Jewish community in France met for the first time at the invitation of Emperor Napoleon I. It was an important date, constituting, in a sense, the birth of your community as an institution.

The Great Sanhedrin, which completed its work a month later, on March 9, marked the final act in the process of the emancipation of the Jews, initiated in 1789. The Declaration of the Rights of Man proclaimed equality. It inaugurated a new era of freedom and tolerance for the Jews of France, and for the other religious minorities on our soil.

But the weight of the past had to be reckoned with. Pierre Emmanuel evokes the Jewish people's "singular destiny," for which, he emphasizes, "it has historically paid a very high price." That is putting it mildly. In this Christian France that gradually grew up around the State, 15 centuries of history were marked by ostracism and prejudice toward Jews. There were restrictions and exceptional measures. Jews were prohibited from exercising a large number of professions. The obligatory and derogatory wearing of distinctive signs, such as the calf's leg imposed by Saint-Louis, was a distant ancestor of the yellow star of horrific memory. There were banishments, often followed by appeals to return, so necessary were Jews to the economic life of the kingdom. There were acts of violence inflicted upon goods and people, including auto-da-fés and burnings at the stake.

After so many trials and acts of incomprehension, the Declaration of the Rights of Man alone was not sufficient, in the minds of the men of the Revolution, to extend full citizenship to the Jews of France. That is why long debates were still necessary. Often passionate, they tended to reveal an ignorance of Jewish faith and culture but were also marked by a revolutionary fervor and generosity that in the end would win the day.

The "liberating" decree of September 27, 1791, finally recognized the citizenship of the Jews of France. It was a great step that aroused deep emotions in the community. A French Jew testifies to this enthusiasm and hope in the columns of a Parisian newspaper, in the words of his age: "France," he writes, "is our Palestine, its mountains are our Zion, its rivers are our Jordan. Freedom has but one tongue and all men know its alphabet. The most subjugated nation will pray for the one that released the slaves from their chains. France is the refuge of the oppressed."

Then the Statue of Isis was sent to Amerika the new home of the Jews

But the victory was not complete. The principles and texts still had to be accepted in fact and in daily life. It was still necessary to vanquish deeply rooted myths, beliefs and fears. For French society, "lulled since childhood with fables from the most distant Middle Ages," a long education process had begun.

Now to re-educate with the fables of the Babylonian Jews the leaven of the Pharisees.

At the same time he convened the Great Sanhedrin, Napoleon I himself expressed a lack of knowledge and mistrust toward the Jews he himself was striving to better understand. Bonaparte was a man of his time, heir to the Enlightenment. Like Rousseau, who proclaimed in L'Emile, "I do not believe I will ever understood the reasons of the Jews until they have a free State, schools and universities where they can talk and discuss without risk. Then we will know what they have to say," Napoleon I wanted to understand the Jewish religion. That is why he convened his "Estates-General" and questioned its representatives.

Napolean went into the Great Temple of Satan the Pyramid Cheops and returned as white as a ghost, when they asked him what he saw he was speechless, though he said they would not believe it even if he told them.

Would the strict observance of the traditions and obligations of the Jewish faith permit obedience to the laws of France? Would it allow Jews to take part in the life of the nation? Would the Jews themselves wish to do so?

Today questions like these, which we find shocking to read, so strongly do they convey a desire for State control over your community, have been answered by the past two centuries. History testifies to the constant commitment of the Jews of our country to serve France and democracy.

Then rob the people blind and to serve themselves from the spoils of the widows and the orphans which they have created.

A commitment that was first and foremost civil, with the activities of the Religious Councils. True to their motto, "Fatherland and Religion," they promoted the use of the French language, enabled young Jews to take part in military service and helped spread patriotic virtues.

Homeland and patriotic responsibilities....sound very familiar.

This civic commitment was fulfilled as soon as the nation was shaken by dramatic events. How much blood was spilled for France in the course of its wars and during the Great War, a sacrifice that would make what later happened during the dark years unimaginable for French Jews.

A commitment that was intellectual, cultural, spiritual. So many creators, thinkers, writers, artists. So many economists, engineers, academics and scholars hailed from your community!

The France that creates, the France that invents, the France that carries its colors proudly, would not be what it is today without the French Jews, who played a major role in building our national heritage. They irrigated our land with the humanism and spirituality that have always been the essence of Judaism.

And finally, a political commitment.

It is no coincidence that over the past two centuries, many of your fellow Jews have been in the forefront of the fight for democracy and the Republic.(Socialism) The Revolution was the first to recognize their dignity as citizens. As it spread throughout Europe, it destroyed ghetto walls. The Jews of France and of the world will not forget this. Particularly those of Central and Eastern Europe who, persecuted at home, would find refuge in our country.

Having borne, throughout history, the weight of oppression and arbitrariness, they realized the incalculable value of liberty and equality. They knew that the Republic meant the possibility for each person to live fully according to his or her faith, convictions and traditions, as long as one accepts and abides by its laws.

Laws that they made

That is why the Jews of France would identify with the Republic. That is why they would draw the hatred and violence of those nostalgic for the old order. That is why, even though the last discriminatory text was stricken from the books in 1846, the anti-Judaism of Christian tradition would merge little by little with a more racial, more political anti-Semitism, often advocated by the enemies of the Republic who were still numerous at the beginning of this century. But the worst was yet to come.

First there was the Dreyfus Affair, which revealed a virulent anti-Semitism that led many Jews, in France and elsewhere, to dream of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Let us not forget, however, that it also revealed the attachment of many French people to our values of liberty, equality and fraternity. There were constant and ever-so-violent attacks by a certain segment of the press and certain milieus. We know there is no such thing as innocent words. The terrible ones pronounced during the period between the two wars foreshadowed the horror yet to come.

That was the worst. Nazism. The Occupation. The dark years.

the sacrifice Which helped to secure Zionism and the occupation of Palestine and global control

Betraying the values, the genius and the mission of France, the French State and the Vichy Government would become accomplices to the unspeakable.

A year and a half ago, I insisted on the official acknowledgment of the French government's responsibility for the arrest, deportation and death of thousands upon thousands of Jews.

This duty to remember must be seen through to the end. We must shed all possible light on the role of Vichy and its representatives.

We must carry out the necessary investigations to find out what became of the property confiscated by the Occupiers and their accomplices. That is the role of the working group whose leadership has just been confided by the prime minister to Jean Matteoli, head of the Economic and Social Council.

Fifty years later, France, an adult nation, must come to terms with all of its history. To build the future, we cannot ignore the past.

There was General de Gaulle and his appeal of June 18. There was the shadow army and its matter-of-course heroism. There were thousands of French people who saved Jews. But there was also indifference, cowardice and active collaboration, the fault of those who were responsible for the State and the mission of defending the values of France and the Republic.

Valiant men and women who helped the innocent victims of the most cowardly scheme that Satan could devise. The Babylonian Talmudic sons of the synagogue of Satan which planned the entire scheme of Hitler in order to bring in their Moshiach of all the world, that false-Christ and the son of Satan.

Evoking this evening the history of the Jewish community in France means first of all accepting the duties of memory and truth.

Yes, Ladies and Gentlemen, the history of your community speaks to all of us. It compels the most extreme vigilance. But it also invites us to feel hope and confidence.

The Jews of France show us that one can be faithful to one's faith, traditions and culture, hand down one's principles and identity, while acknowledging the values of the Republic and passionately loving one's homeland.

Homeland of Socialism, Security

Naturally, I am aware of your community's very strong ties to Israel. I am aware of the hope you attach to the peace process. I am aware of the attention with which you follow the relations between France and the Jewish State, relations marked by trust and friendship. But I am also aware that the French Jews are great republicans and great patriots.

What better reply to all those who believe that identity is based on everybody's being identical? For centuries, Jews have been present on our soil, joined later by others from Eastern Europe or North Africa, French citizens in Algeria since the Crémieux decree. All brought with them their traditions, their sensibility, their history. They have fully contributed to the diversity and richness of France.

The France that we love, that we desire, is not and will never be a mosaic of juxtaposed communities. It is an open, generous nation, but it is inflexible when it comes to its founding values. Among these values is the ideal of integration.

Naturally, the "integrating mechanism," whose outposts are the Republic's schools, sometimes gets jammed. Naturally, social and economic difficulties, the uncertainties that always accompany periods of transition, make things more difficult than they were during the three prosperous decades following the War.

Nevertheless, the principle retains its strength. We must rediscover the paths of integration, something that requires great steadfastness when it comes to illegal immigration.

Nothing could be more dangerous for foreigners legally residing in France or for their children, whose vocation is to be French; nothing could do more harm to our model of integration than a lax, ambiguous attitude that fuels the forces of hatred.

It is important for me to say this to you. I will always stand in the way of racism in all its forms. I will always defend the values I believe in: the dignity of all men, tolerance, generosity. But by the same token, I will always guard against angelism, naiveté and ignorance which, like good intentions, pave the road to the hell of xenophobia.

Make the world fearful of opposition to the synagogues of the Babylonian Talmudic Chabad Mystical Jews who are liars and the sons of the synagogue of Satan their father of lies. The leaven of the Pharisees.

When will the International Court of Criminal Justice deem that I am an enemy against Humanity and kidnap me from my southern home in the United States, blindfolded and treated as a murdered and torture me for my opposition to Moshiach ben Satan, their king?

Let us therefore beware of baseless comparisons, of references to a somber past, references of an unacceptable nature that your community is in a better position to assess than any other. Let us respect the Law. It is the law of democracy and the law of the Republic. Let us not play into the hands of all those who exploit the uncertainties of the future, advocate withdrawal into ourselves, fan the flames of hatred and fear of the Other. Nothing serves them better than weaknesses on our part.

The principles of the Republic are cannot be divided.

the god of forces

Honorable Rabbis, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, you who represent the religious councils of all of France, you who come from the Mainland and from Overseas, you have celebrated an anniversary. By recalling a moment from the past, you have given new life to the History of your community, a history both joyous and painful, fraught with tragedies and greatness. But in doing so, you have asked a question of France. You have enriched our common reflections on what constitutes our identity, and what it is we have resolved to defend. You have addressed to all the French a message of necessity and of hope. I have heard it and I thank you./.

The Sanhedrin is set up, tha laws of Noachide imposed by the Babylonian One World Order, the so-called Olam Ha Ba of the coming Moshiach, that false King of the Jews are established. Any who do not accept the false-Christ, Moshiach ben Satan whom they will call the son of David, but who is the son of perdition, O' Lucifer the son of the morning, will be slain by the laws of the Sanhedrin, decapitation. Any who hold firm for the testimony of the Only one God Jesus Christ the Alpha and the Omega, will be beheaded. and who shall deliver you up to be confined shall also be captive and who so ever shall slay by the sword also shall be slain by the sword. This is the patience of the saints of God. And who are they, they are those who have came out of the Great Tribulation and whose robes have been washed by the blood of the Lamb of God and who have held firm for the testimony of the Only God, the Truth, the Word.




No they are no fools, they well know the plan of destruction against those who oppose them

see the WTC destruction, ponder the setting up of governments, ponder the skimming of billions from the people via speculation, see the congressmen resiging and leaving office by the droves, see the innoculation of disease in our cattle, see the robbing of the properties of the people, see the killing off of our unborn, see the spread of pornography and pedophilia, see the national and global attacks of Christainity, see the Judaising of the Christian Churches, see the apostasy and the unbiblical heresays and the leaven of the Pharisees, see the laws of the Babylonian come full force, they who rejected and continue to reject the only Lord God, Jesus Christ......see them usher in their god, the son of the morning, consider the Holy Word and wonder why you have not been notified regarding these matters from God, then consider your un-beleif, then wonder ....what happened when they ask you where is your God, Jesus now? Remember these things,, when in fear you will acknowledge their god, Moshiach ben Satan or be beheaded for the fear of him who can destroy your soul.

Consider the Truth, for the Truth shall set you free.

Consider the Lord of Lords, Jesus Christ, God and his Father, the Almighty God.




To Home Page button

The Court

The proposed International Criminal Court will be a permanent Court that will investigate and bring to justice individuals, not countries, who commit the most serious crimes of concern to the international community, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity-including widespread murder of civilians, torture and mass rape. The ICC will be a global judicial institution, an international jurisdiction complementing national legal systems.

The Rome Statute entered into force on 1 July 2002.


Thanks Bill Clinton, another 33rd degreed Free Mason of the order of Apostate Solomon and his god Moloch


Did they mention, to uphold the Noachide Laws enacted Globally? So-called United Nations hate crimes of xenophobia and intolerance of the sons of the synagogue of Satan, the Babylonians?

Special guests at the reception on 1 July 2002, co-hosted by the Bureau of the Preparatory Commission for the ICC and the NGO Coalition for the ICC (left-right): William Pace, Mrs. Nane Annan (Jewish), UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, Ambassador Philippe Kirsch, Under Secretary General Hanz Corell and Professor Ben Ferencz

The ICC will function not only as a mechanism for ensuring just recourse under the law, it will also serve as a powerful deterrent to the future Pinochets, Pol Pots and Milosevics of the world. The Court is looked to by its proponents as a means of encouraging national judicial systems to address these crimes, as the Court will intervene only in cases in which a domestic legal system is either unwilling or unable to handle the case.

Pace explained that the 60 ratifications required for the treaty to enter into force were achieved decades earlier than almost anyone predicted when the treaty was adopted in July 1998 in Rome. "Today's momentous achievement can only be understood as a victory of the new diplomacy model of developing international law," he said. "It reflects one of the best examples of what can be achieved through cooperation between governments, international organizations and NGOs."

While the treaty will enter into force and establish the jurisdiction of the Court on 1 July 2002, it is not likely that the Court will begin to hear cases for at least twelve months afterward. During that time key developments in the creation of the Court will be addressed in the final Preparatory Commission of the ICC in July and the first Assembly of States Parties in September of this year. These meetings will finalize processes for the nomination and election of judges and a prosecutor and formalize other critical administrative and procedural issues. The ICC will be located in the Hague, the Netherlands.


According to O.J Graham in his book " The Six Pointed Star" David Ben Gurion wrote:..

The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: The cold war will be a thing of the past. Internal pressure of the constantly growing intelligrntsia in Russia for more freedom and the pressure of the masses for raising their living standards may lead to a gradual democratization of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, the increasing influence of the workers and farmers, and the rising political importance of men of science, may transform the United States into a welfare state with a planned economy. Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the U.S.S.R. as a federated eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (A truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents: This will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents.

Ben Gurion did not say how this would be acheived, but by golly he must have been able to see into the future, either by God the Most High, or understanding of the plan of his god. He of course a Babylonian Talmudic Jew of the synagogue of Satan who rejected the ONLY GOD, Jesus Christ, could not have been shown these exact things which have happened to the T and all i's dotted, by the Lord whom he rejected, Jesus.

The cold war is so-called a thing of the past, the very hot hot war with the powers and the principalities of Darkness the demons from hell is now waging.

The United States is a welfare state, and are they surely planning a controlled economy.

Europe is a federation.

Ruussia is the Russian Federation

The international police force is established, Homeland..Faddherland 4th Reicht.

New World Order Olam Ha Ba a truly One World Order is established

The Babylonian Talmudic Supreme Court, Great (not so great) Sanhedrin International Court of Criminal Justice established

Soon, a shrine, a temple unto their god, Moshiach a shrine.

1. The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces - are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.

Courts of Justice

Human beings are required to establish Law Courts, or Courts of Justice, to maintain the Seven Laws of Noah. It is pointless to call the Seven Laws "laws" if there are no courts to enforce them when necessary. However, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to observe this commandment in the United States of America - for example, the Constitution of the United States, by allowing "freedom of religion," allows idolatrous practices to be the norm. B'nei Noach cannot, under the laws of the land, establish courts that would mete out punishment for transgression of the Seven Noachide Laws. Fortunately, observant B'nei Noach, when facing litigation between themselves over most issues (with the possible
exception being murder/homicide or manslaughter, which is in the jurisdiction of the civil courts of the land), can choose to take their case before a Beis Din, an orthodox Jewish Court, which is halakhically (legally, technically) required to rule in these matters. In this manner, B'nei Noach are observing some of the aspects of this prohibition.

And you thought I was just kidding didn't you?

Oh no, there is no conspiracy, you might blindly think.

The International Criminal Court
Fact sheet 4
Prosecuting crimes against humanity

''[The parties agree to draw up additional instruments] in view of future improvements which science may effect in the armament of troops, in order to maintain the principles which they have established, and to conciliate the necessities of war with the dictates of humanity''.

Declaration Renouncing the Use, in Time of War, of Explosive Projectiles under 400 Grammes Weight (St. Petersburg Declaration), 1868

The concept of ''crimes against humanity'' dates to the middle of the nineteenth century. Although the first list of such crimes was made at the end of the First World War, they were not codified in an international instrument until the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal in 1945. Crimes against humanity as identified in the Nuremberg Charter were recognized as part of international law by the United Nations General Assembly the following year and were included in subsequent international instruments, including the Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. They have now been defined for the first time in an international treaty when the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Statute) was adopted on 17 July 1998.

What distinguishes ordinary crimes from crimes against humanity?
The Statute distinguishes ordinary crimes from crimes against humanity over which the International Criminal Court (ICC) has jurisdiction in three ways.

First, the acts which constitute crimes, such as murder, must have been ''committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack''. However, the word ''attack'' here does not mean a military attack and can include laws and administrative measures such as deportation and forced displacement.

They are not speaking of military terrorism, for the armies of the world are immune from the laws set forth, what they have well planned is they will quell the unrest of the people at the hour of the coup and destroy all opposition against their plan of Satan. Their enemy, those who cherish individualism under the creator.

Second, they must be directed against a civilian population.'' Single, isolated, dispersed or random acts that do not rise to the level of crimes against humanity, cannot be prosecuted as such. The presence of a few soldiers among the civilian population is not sufficient to deprive it of its civilian character.

Third, they must have been committed pursuant to ''a State or organizational policy''. Thus, they can be committed by state agents or by persons acting at their instigation or with their consent or acquiescence, such as death squads. Crimes against humanity can also be committed pursuant to policies of organizations, such as rebel groups, which have no connection with the government.

What acts constitute crimes against humanity?
The Statute defines the following 11 types of acts as being capable of amounting to crimes against humanity:

Does abortion fit in here? Not hardly. Does killing the Goyim fit here? Not hardly the laws of decapitation have already been passed for those who oppose the coming Moshiach ben Satan

Only speaking of the Talmudic Jews and the obedient little bondservants, the so-called righteous Noachides who have accepted the fables of the Jews and the leavened bread of the Pharisees.

Save the pedophiles of Talmud

Scripture is clear, they will all return to their own countries.

Except military tribunal courts which give them exclusive rights to hold anyone for an undetermined time only by the power and the authority of their puppet president.

Except for Arik Sheinerman and Alan Jerk-of- wits who wants so badly to publicly torture the rock throwers in Palestine.

And, but, of course 

it all sounds so wonderful that many will overlook the provision, aimed at protecting the sons of the synagogues of Satan. Hate crimes are soon to be enacted which will make thought a criminal conviction. Does this mean that the Talmudic hatred for Christians are thought crimes? Don't count on it.

Such as the Bushka Military Tribunal?

"When Moshiach comes - may we merit this speedily - and the Temple will be rebuilt, the great Sanhedrin will once again meet in the Chamber of Hewed Stones in the Temple. At that time, peace will reign, and the city of Jerusalem will expand to include all of the Land of Israel!


Have the Wolves in sheeps clothing, of the cemeteries of Babylonian Theological training, always taught you that Jewry was a nationality?

Why have they not told you the truth? That Jewry is a religion developed while in captivity in Assyria? The Religion of Baal, and no nationality. 

Despite violence, West Bank settlements drawing people from around the world
Wed Jul 3, 8:06 PM ET

By GREG MYRE, Associated Press Writer

KARMEI TSUR, West Bank - Just two months ago, Mariano Perez, a Peruvian Indian, was living a quiet life as a construction worker on the Pacific coast of his homeland. He had never been to Israel, spoke no Hebrew, and until late last year, wasn't considered Jewish.

Today, Perez wears a yarmulke, has changed his first name to Mordechai and is on the front lines of the Mideast conflict.

Peruvians like Perez, some of them followers of a Christian sect with Jewish traditions, were formally converted to Judaism by Israeli rabbis last November to qualify for residency under the laws of the Jewish state. About 100 arrived this spring and moved directly into West Bank Jewish settlements, which are pushing hard to increase their numbers while Palestinian militants try to drive them out with persistent shooting attacks.

Perez lives with his wife, Leah, and their four children on this rocky hilltop settlement. They rarely go beyond the barbed wire surrounding the 100-family outpost as the parents undergo a full-immersion course in Hebrew — and the violent realities of the Middle East.

The settlers, with the help of Jewish groups and the Israeli government, are seeking out newcomers wherever they can find them. Despite violence that has led some settlers to leave, the overall settlement population increased about 5 percent last year. That's down a couple of percentage points from recent years, but still amounts to an additional 10,000 people.

Settlements range from Maale Adumim, effectively a suburb of Jerusalem with 25,000 people and its own Burger King, to barren desert outposts where settlers have parked two or three trailers on an empty hill — in some cases without Israeli government permission.

Peace Now, an Israeli group that opposes settlements, says more than 40 unauthorized outposts sprang up after Prime Minister Ariel Sharon  came to power last year. Sharon has been a leading advocate of settlements since Israel began building them on lands captured in the 1967 Mideast War.

Sharon says he won't remove any government-approved settlements at present, and with peace talks collapsed, he faces little domestic pressure to do so. However, 11 of the illegal, makeshift settlements were taken down June 30, and Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer said more would be removed.

The fate of the settlements is an issue that deeply divides Israeli society and is one of the most difficult questions to resolve in any Mideast peace deal.

U.S. President George W. Bush , in a policy speech June 24, demanded the Palestinians make many fundamental reforms, but also said settlement-building must stop.

Most new settlers still come from Israel proper, but recruiting efforts have been stepped up in the past year to attract Jews worldwide.

"The settlers are looking for 'lost Jewish tribes' in India, Brazil, Peru, you name it," said Dror Etkes, who monitors settlements for Peace Now. "They are looking for people willing to make a religious commitment, and who are seeking to improve their lives — as long as they are willing to live in the West Bank."


"Improve" their lives at the expense of the American taxpayer dollars. The same dollars which will have those who hold firm to the testimony of Jesus, beheaded in the near future. As long, of course as these new Jews are willing to put their lives on the line for the Talmudic Zion plan.


The vast majority of immigrants were born Jewish. Perez, 40, and his wife began practicing Judaism several years ago in their coastal town of Trujillo, but by Israel's standards were not considered Jewish until the rabbis came to Peru and formally converted them on Nov. 23.

Overall figures on immigrant settlers are hard to come by. The largest group is from the former Soviet Union, estimated at more than 13,000, and many come from the United States.



And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.

By Ray Novosel

The simple facts are that after the death of Solomon, the Kingdom of Israel was divided into two kingdoms.  The Northern Kingdom - composed of ten (10) tribes, with the capital at Samaria, called "Israel," and the Southern Kingdom - composed of only two (2) tribes (Judah & Benjamin), with the capital at Jerusalem, called "Judah."  Both of these Kingdoms went into Captivity to Babylon within a few short years of each other, due to Israel’s sins of pride and rebellion.  Contrary to what most teach and believe, the following Biblical giants were never "Jews."

q       ABRAHAM - was a Hebrew (racial)

q       ISSAC - was a Hebrew

q       JACOB - was a Hebrew

q       MOSES - was a Levite (tribal)

q        PAUL – was a Benjaminite and BECAME a devout and religious JEW BY CHOICE!

q        JESUS – was/is The Son of God, a strict adherent of His own Law, but never a JEW!


Saul was a racial Israelite, a Roman citizen - born in Tarsus and studied the “Traditions of the Elders/Fathers” (Gal 1:14) under the Pharisee, Gemaliel, in Jerusalem in his youth and became the “golden haired boy” of the controlling Jewish establishment.  At this time, prior to his conversion, Saul was a vicious, Babylonian Talmudic Pharisaic Antichrist that persecuted the followers of “The Way” to their deaths, arresting both men and women and throwing them into prison whenever the opportunity arose.  Paul wrote: "You have heard of my earlier CAREER in Judaism - how furiously I persecuted the Church of God, and made havoc of it; and how in devotion to Judaism I out-stripped many men of may own age among my people, being far more zealous than they for the tradition of my forefathers" (Gal 1:13, 14, Weymouth Translation)

Clearly while in Judaism, Saul persecuted Christians due to his intense hatred for believers, because of his total commitment to the fraternity holding to the “traditions of the fathers.”  Paul at that time, was a Jew BY RELIGION ONLY!

Please carefully read it again, “And profited in the Jews' RELIGION above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.” (Gal 1:14 KJV) 

When Paul became a Christian, HE CEASED BEING A “JEW” as such, simply because Pharisaism (Judaism, Jewry) TOTALLY CONTRADICTED EVERYTHING he now stood for as an Apostle of Christ.

In fact, this very system of religious/cultish legalism called "Jewry" was something of which even Jesus Himself would NOT walk. This is so incredibly important to understand!!!  “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him. (John 7:1)These "Jews" that were determined to KILL Christ were the cozy, religious (freemasonic) establishment of the Scribes and Pharisees that held considerable political power during the time of the brutal Roman occupation of Palestine, where Jesus openly condemned their status-seeking and carnal, ego-centric attitudes.

Despite the occupation, the Babylonian Talmudic Pharisees were given near total autonomy in dealing with all so-called “religious” matters, where after the death of Herod the Great, Judea was reduced to a Roman province under a procurator.  It was under the fifth procurator, Pontius Pilate, that Jesus Christ was crucified, by order of the Pharisees of whom the Sanhedrin were the supreme ruling/decision-making body.  It was these JEWS who ordered the death of Christ.  The “Jews" referred to, meant the high priests, the Sanhedrin, the scribes and the Pharisees, all of whom earned the scorn of our Lord because of the total abuse of their authority.  The religious establishment saw The Lord Jesus as a threat to their power base because he was becoming popular with the people, who had several times sought to make him their king.

Hence the term "Jew" refers to the followers of this Pharisaic system of religionised law based on men’s traditions and upon generations of subjective interpretations of God’s Law/Word that ultimately became "Talmudic Judaism.”  It was and still is, a powerful, influential and liberal religious sect where only a select and privileged few were invited to join.  "Judaism denotes the Jewish faith in its extravagant form of blind attachment to rites and traditions, and national exclusiveness. This must have been prevalent in the time of Christ, because of His constant exposure of their formalism and self-assumption, and because in John's Gospel 'the Jews' is used as synonymous with opposers of Christ and His teachings." (The Popular and Critical Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. II, (1901), p. 999).


When asked the question, "Who is Israel? - Who is a Jew?" the Israeli Government's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) answered thus: 

"The term Israelite is purely Biblical. An Israeli is a citizen of Israel, regardless of religion.  A Jew is a person anywhere in the world born to a Jewish mother, or converted to Judaism, who is thus identified as a member of the Jewish people and religion.” 

Notice here that the Jews themselves clearly imply that the term "Israelite" and "Jew" are separate and distinct and where Jews have no relation whatsoever with the Biblical Noahatic bloodline. In fact, under the heading "A Brief History of the Terms for Jew," in the 1980 Jewish Almanac, is the following incredible admission: 

"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew".


Today, to trace anyone's descent to ancient Palestine would be a genealogical impossibility.  The Jewish racial myth flows from the fact that the words ‘Hebrew,’ ‘Israelite,’ ‘Jew,’ ‘Judaism,’ and the ‘Jewish people’ have been used synonymously to suggest a historic continuity, but this is a gross misuse.  The descriptive name Judaism was never heard by the Hebrews or Israelites; it appears only within modern Christianity.  The English abbreviation, 'Jew,’ is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for 'Judahite' or 'Judean,’ which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, according to Reporting Guidelines for the Australian Press Council, General Press Release No. 49 (issued June 1982) with reference to the word "Race" as applied to Jews. 


 “The Press Council wishes to alert editors to a common mistake.  There is no "Jewish race". Judaism is not a race but a religion. There are Caucasian Jews, Mongolian Jews, Oriental Jews, Semitic Jews and so on - terms defining both racial origin and religion.  The Council asks all editors and sub-editors to watch for this error . . . .”


During Christ’s lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. This very important FACT is supported by sound theology, suppressed historical truth and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves as "Jews". Their ancestors never set-foot anywhere near Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their true "homeland", and were known as Chazars, or Turkish Mongols.  Banned author Douglas Reed, in his superbly researched classic, “Controversy of Zion,” writes:

 "No authority, Judaist or other, would support the claim to blood decent from Judah for the so-called Jews of today."  In fact, the Palestinians would have more claim to the racial description, 'Semite', than any within modern Jewry who are of Eastern-European stock and trace their lineage back to the ancient Asiatic kingdom of the Chazar”. 


Racially, Jesus Christ was a Hebrew of the tribe of Yehudah (Judah), one of the twelve tribes of ISRAEL - Jesus was properly known as either a Samaritan, a Nazarene, or a Galilean, since he lived his entire life, with the exception of the first two years, in an area which was northeast of both Judea and Samaria.  In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described as, or referred to, as a "Jew."  The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the general term ‘Judean’ and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Victorian" signifies any person living in that particular Australian state.  Benjamin Freedman in his suppressed classic: “Facts are Facts,” dealing with this very important issue says:  

"Incontestable historic facts and an abundance of other proofs establish beyond the possibility of any doubt the incredibility of the assertion so often heard today that 'Jesus was a Jew'. Without any fear of contradiction based upon the most competent and best qualified authorities all agree that Jesus Christ was not a so-called or self-styled 'Jew'. They now confirm that during His lifetime Jesus was known as a 'Judean' by His contemporaries and not as a 'Jew' and that Jesus referred to Himself as a 'Judean' and not as a 'Jew'. "Inscribed upon the Cross when Jesus was crucified were the Latin words 'Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum'. Pontius Pilate was the author of that infamous inscription. Latin was Pontius Pilate's mother-tongue. No one will question the fact that Pontius Pilate was well able to accurately express his own ideas in his own mother tongue. The authorities competent to pass upon the correct translation into English of the Latin 'Iesus' Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum' agree that it is 'Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans".


 This still places a racial bloodline importance to what is plainly SPIRITUAL. A modern day "Israelite" has NO CONNECTION WHATSOEVER by blood/race/tradition/culture the ancient hebrew Israelites, and , the Son of man might have been flesh and blood but Jesus the GOD/SON was not nor did not come as a MAN, but as a "GOD"(Isa.47:3). One is purely physical, the other spiritual and the twain DO NOT MEET and it gets disturbing when I keep hearing this "tribe", "hebrew" and Jesus was talk. It all depends on what "Jesus" you want to look at. I always get a little ansi when I hear ranted "Jesus was a Jew" and the emphasis placed on that racial subline. 

Jason Guenther

The World Ha! Ha! Moshiach ben Satan Organization of the Olam Ha Ba Ha! Ha!

The World Zionist Organization, part of the larger Jewish Agency, launched a program last year to boost immigration, and it welcomes and assists those seeking to live in the settlements, agency chairman Sallai Meridor said.

Rows of recently built houses with their distinctive red-tiled roofs stand empty in some settlements in the most volatile areas. But the conflict has also inspired a number of Jews to immigrate out of solidarity with Israel.

"Some Jews feel this is the time to share their destiny with Israel," said Sarah Weinreb, who heads a recently established recruitment program at Gush Etzion, a large settlement bloc south of Jerusalem, which includes Karmei Tsur.

Weinreb has helped bring 120 families to Gush Etzion in the past three months, and is expecting 50 more. They come from the United States, Britain, South Africa and Canada.

On her recent trip to South Africa, she said, potential immigrants "asked me 5,000 questions. They asked about job prospects, and whether they could bring their dog, but they weren't asking about security."

"If they had asked, I would have told them: 'I can't promise anything. We hope for the best,'" she said.

Weinreb says many immigrants prefer the settlements over cities like Tel Aviv and Jerusalem because they are small, close-knit communities with strong support networks.

Arriving in Karmei Tsur, the Peruvian families moved immediately into furnished trailers with food-filled refrigerators. For the first six months, the parents receive language lessons, and then get help finding jobs. The children receive extra tutoring at school. The settlement already includes immigrants from Brazil, Argentina, Ethiopia, Britain and Spain.

The incentives support a policy many foreign governments consider illegal because the settlements are on war-won land.

Palestinians see their placement as a strategic effort to dice up the West Bank and foreclose any chance of it becoming a Palestinian state. It galls them to see newcomers from Russia or Peru moving in, while Palestinians dispossessed in the 1948 war that followed Israeli statehood live in refugee camps.

"No settler is welcome on our land," said Ahmed Abdel Rahman, the Palestinian Cabinet secretary. "We have the full right to resist the settlers' existence in our land, because it is a part of the occupation, and an obstacle in the way of a Palestinian state."

Despite an economic downturn in Israel, settlers have largely been spared government spending cuts. Their subsidies include cheap land and mortgages, low-cost schooling and tax breaks.

Some secular settlers say the financial breaks were the main attraction. But most are deeply religious, and believe this is their biblical Promised Land. Some say they would use force to resist eviction, even if it was part of a peace deal.

Some see settlements as a way of guaranteeing Israel won't return to its narrow, vulnerable pre-1967 borders. Others say they are a drain on the military because soldiers must be placed in harm's way to defend them.

Some maintain that settlements are a sacred tenet of Zionism. Others point out that after Israel made peace with Egypt in 1979, it uprooted its settlements in the Sinai Peninsula.

Until a few weeks ago, Shlomo Mor, a 55-year-old retired army colonel, and his son, Aviad, 23, were the only residents on a mountain between two settlements at the southern tip of the West Bank, with two Israeli army soldiers to guard them.

Now Aviad's girlfriend and an old school friend have moved in, and his father has brought in a ranch hand to help tend his 100 sheep. The settlement doesn't even have a name, but it does have government approval.

"I like being alone in the mountains," said Mor. "I like the quiet. I like the night and the stars."

Many Karmei Tsur settlers commute to nearby Jerusalem by day, traveling a road thick with Israeli military checkpoints that guard against attacks. Palestinian villages, with minarets rising from mosques, dominate the hillsides.

But in the enclosed world of the settlement, among the cookie-cutter houses and leafy gardens, the atmosphere is relaxed. On a cloudless summer day, the playground is filled with the sounds of shouting children and barking dogs. It could be most any suburban community, but for the men with pistols tucked in their waistbands, automatic rifles slung over their shoulders, or both.

"We knew about the troubles here, and we were told we would be living next to Arabs," said Perez. "We have a synagogue to pray. The people here care for us. We are very grateful for this opportunity."

When will your community be occupied?


The not so Great Sanhedrin will be fully revived, July 1, 2002 then soon after Heads will begin to roll. Any who opposes will be terminated from the coming Olam Ha Ba of Lucifer. They will enforce the Babylonian Talmudic Laws of Satans obedient not so righteous Goy toys, Noachides.


 So, you see, unless you are blind or so full of Biblical unbelief, even a complete embicile can see that the so-called prophets and learned cemetery trained Bible scholars are as far off in their search for a so-called anti-Christ and false Prophet, as the other end of the Universe from earth.



Revelation 13:11-18

     11: And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.

Moshiach ben Satan's false prophet of the hidden chamber of the Hewn Stone of the Great Sanhedrin, International Court of Justice.

Giovanni Batista RE?

12: And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
13: And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
14: And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
15: And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
16: And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

Star of Moloch, the six pointed star, his star, Moschiach ben David

17: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18: Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

The number of the final tzaddik, the king of the Jews, behold false Christ


16. Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.

27. Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men, whom we wanted, we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man; and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyze initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities.


1. The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces - are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.

2. We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form the principal subject of the teaching given to the Jews. Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and - THE MAIN THING - MILLIONAIRES, BECAUSE IN SUBSTANCE EVERYTHING WILL BE SETTLED BY THE QUESTION OF FIGURES.


Texe Marrs

There is no doubt that vaccines have miraculously been used to save tens of millions of human lives and to prevent horrible forms of human suffering from diseases. The polio and smallpox vaccines are only two examples of life-giving vaccines.

But the same medical achievement that saves lives, in the hands of evil men, may be used to abuse and harm.

Babylonian Talmudic Chabad Lubavitchers Illuminati Establishes Vaccine Task Force

(Illuminati = Babylonian Talmudic Jews and the sons of the synagogues of Satan)

I am giving you the identities of the so-called ruse of diversion with an invisible force called Illuminati, for they are revealed and identified.

Chabad Lubavitch Ashke-nazi Babylonian Talmudic Mystical whoremongerers of Satan

The Illuminati's most pre-eminent leaders have recently taken a keen interest in the field of vaccines. They have established a special task force to oversee the administration of vaccines to children and adults throughout the world, called the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI).

The first meeting of this eerie and ominous GAVI task force was held in Davos, Switzerland, in 2000. Its members include Microsoft's Bill and Melinda Gates, the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO), the Rockefeller Foundation, and the World Bank. The national governments of Russia and the U.S.A. are also involved. Bill Gates, for now, seems to be the principal force behind the work of GAVI.

Microsoft founder, Bill Gates, reputed to be the world's richest man, is helping to fund the United Nations vaccine programs. Gates, a secular Jew, has said he does not believe in God. He regularly attends former Communist party boss Mikhail Gorbachev's annual State of the World Forum held at the former Presidio Army base in California

Gates, whose Microsoft is at the forefront of developing new nanotransistor technology, says he has 24 billion dollars of his own money to give away. A lot of this money is going to go toward the development of new vaccines, which the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) will administer by injections of the world's poor.

Secret Vaccine Ingredient Kills Unborn Babies

Gates, said to be the richest man on earth, and his wife, Melinda, are also known to support Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion and global depopulation causes. According to reliable sources, some of the new vaccines being developed by the United Nations (WHO) with Gates' money secretly contain poisonous chemicals—chemicals which act to kill unborn babies inside the mothers' womb.

In 1999, the American Life League was horrified to discover that UN vaccines were being used as hidden depopulation "bombs." The pro-life group went straight to Bill Gates with its discovery and confronted him, as the following news report indicates:


Gates-Sponsored Vaccine Program a Depopulation Measure?

Washington, Dec. 14 (—The American Life League, a pro-life organization, confronted software mogul Bill Gates last week, telling him that a World Health Organization (WHO) tetanus vaccination program undertaken with Gates' sponsorship bears striking resemblance to a similar WHO program which was exposed as a measure to involuntarily sterilize young women in the Philippines. Gates has donated $26 million to a WHO tetanus program in several developing countries.


In its press release, the American Life League notes that a previous tetanus program, conducted in the Philippines in 1995, aroused suspicion from Catholic health workers since it involved only women in their child-bearing years, an oddity since tetanus effects men and women, old and young alike. An investigation revealed that the women were given the tetanus vaccine combined with a chemical called Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (HCG) to create an anti-pregnancy agent. The BBC, in conjunction with the Philippine Department of Health and the Philippine Medical Association, reported that many Filipino women suffered spontaneous abortions due to the vaccine, which creates an immune response to pregnancy in the mother's body.

"The current Gates funded program, involving the WHO in several developing countries, is once again aimed only at women in their child-bearing years. This is the world of population elimination," said the American Life League. "Most likely, Gates believes his funds are helping sick women and children, but in reality they're creating unimaginable suffering."


Pledge Part II

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II


"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws


Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2